John A. Stassi II Community Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 80.4 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene procedures were implemented by staff for 4 (Resident #19, Resident #22, Resident #58, Resident #82) of 9 sampled residents investigated for infection control.Findings:Review of the facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene Policy dated August 2015 revealed, in part, staff were to perform hand hygiene after contact with objects in the immediate vicinity of the resident. Observation on 12/01/2025 at 10:45AM revealed S5Certified Nursing Assistant was passing ice to the residents. Further observation revealed S5Certified Nursing Assistant did not perform hand hygiene between passing ice to Resident #58 and passing ice to Resident #22 in their shared room, Room a. Further observation revealed S5Certified Nursing Assistant did not perform hand hygiene after leaving Room a, before passing ice to the residents in Room b. Observation on 12/01/2025 at 10:50AM revealed S5Certified Nursing Assistant did not perform hand hygiene between passing ice to Resident #82 and passing ice to Resident #19 in their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a comprehensive care plan which addressed the need for staff assistance with showers/baths which included measurable objectives and timeframes for 1 (Resident #10) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings:Review of Resident #10's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 09/16/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #10 required substantial/maximal assistance from staff with showers/baths. Review of Resident #10's care plan revealed, in part, Resident #10 had a self-care deficit related to weakness. Further review revealed Resident #10's care plan did not address Resident #10's frequency and/or need for substantial/maximal assistance from staff with showers/baths. On 12/03/2025 at 3:52PM, S2Assistant Director of Nursing was informed of the above findings, and the surveyor presented S2Assistant Director of Nursing with the opportunity to present any additional evidence to dispute the above mentioned deficient practice. In an interview on 12/03/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received assistance with showers/baths for 1 (Resident #10) of 4 sampled residents investigated for assistance with activities of daily living. Findings:Review of Resident #10's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 09/16/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #10 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14 which indicated she was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #10 required substantial/maximal assistance from staff with showers/baths. Review of Resident #10's care plan revealed, in part, Resident #10 had a self-care deficit related to weakness. In an interview on 12/01/2025 at 10:51AM, Resident #10 indicated her bath schedule was Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. Resident #10 further indicated she did not received a shower on Friday, 11/28/2025 per her bath schedule. Resident #10 further indicated she did not receive a shower/bath until Monday, 12/01/2025. Review of Resident #10's Care Task log dated 11/04/2025 through 12/02/2025 revealed, in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to administer pressure ulcer care as prescribed for 1 (Resident #5) of 3 sampled residents investigated for pressure ulcers. Findings:Review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/03/2025 revealed, in part, a diagnosis of pressure ulcer stage 3. Review of Resident #5's facility contracted wound care progress note dated 11/10/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #5 had one pressure ulcer located on the sacrum and one pressure ulcer located on the buttocks. Review of Resident #5's skin and wound evaluations for November and December 2025 revealed an evaluation of Resident #5's sacral pressure ulcer dated 11/24/25. Further review revealed no documented evidence of a skin and wound evaluation for Resident #5's buttock pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #5's November and December 2025 electronic treatment administration record revealed the only evidence of orders for pressure ulcer care was for Resident #5's sacral pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #5's December 2025 Physician Orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for oxygen administration. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #84) of 1 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care.Findings:Review of the facility's undated Oxygen Administration policy and procedure revealed, in part, staff should verify that there is a physician's order prior to oxygen administration. Further review revealed the nurse was to review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration.Review of Resident #84's December 2025 physician orders revealed, in part, an order dated 11/05/2025 For Resident #84 to be administered oxygen at 4 liters per minute per nasal cannula (oxygen administered per the nose) every shift. Resident #84 oxygen every shift at 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula.Observation on 12/01/2025 at 11:07AM revealed Resident #84 was receiving continuous oxygen at 2.5 liters per minute via oxygen concentrator.In an interview on 12/02/2025 at 2:15PM with S6Licensed Practical Nurse indicated Resident #84 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dietary employee (S8Dietary Manager) wore a beard restraint during the handling and preparation of food for 1 (S8Dietary Manager) of 4 dietary personnel observed during kitchen observations. Findings: Review of the Food and Drug Administration 2022 Food Code Chapter 22, revealed, in part, food employees should wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covered body hair, which are designed and worn to effectively keep hair from contacting exposed food. Observation on 12/02/25 at 12:25PM revealed S8Dietary Manager had facial hair on his lip and chin. Further observation revealed S8Dietary Manager was standing in a food preparation area in the kitchen while exposed food was present without a beard restraint. Observation on 12/03/2025 at 2:10PM revealed S8Dietary Manager had facial hair on his lip and chin. Further observation revealed S8Dietary Manager was standing in a food preparation area in the kitchen while exposed food was present without a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to: 1. ensure opened food products stored in the kitchen were sealed and/or labeled with the date the product was opened; 2. ensure food was prepared in a sanitary manner; and, 3. ensure facility's ice machine was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. 1. Review of the facility's Food Receiving and Storage policy and procedure with a revision date of 10/2017, revealed, in part, all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled, and dated. Observation of the facility's reach in cooler on 10/28/2024 at 8:58 a.m. revealed an opened package of cooked sliced meat in an unsealed bag with no product label or opened date written on the bag. In an interview on 10/28/2024 at 8:59 a.m., S4Food Service Manager (FSM) indicated the unlabeled package of sliced meat was ham and confirmed it was not labeled or dated and should have been. Observation of a storage cart in the kitchen preparation area on 10/28/2024 at 9:00 a.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff performed proper hand hygiene while performing wound care for 1 (Resident #47) of 4 (Resident #19, Resident #29, Resident #47, and Resident #68) residents observed for wound care; 2. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) completed hand hygiene during incontinence care for 1 (Resident #19) of 1 (Resident #19) sampled residents reviewed for incontinence care; and, 3.Staff identified and decontaminated a blood spill in a timely manner per facility's policy. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene with a revision date of 8/2015 revealed, in part, hand hygiene is considered the primary means to prevent the spread of infection. Further review revealed, in part, hand hygiene is to be performed before handling clean or soiled dressing and/or gauze pads and after handling used dressings. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Wound Care with a revision date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident's pressure ulcer treatment plan was carried out in accordance with physician's orders for 1 (Resident #19) of 4 (Resident #19, Resident #29, Resident #47, and Resident #68) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. Findings: Review of the facility's Wound Care policy and procedure dated 01/19/2022 revealed, in part, pressure relieving devices and repositioning schedules should be adhered to as part of the resident's wound plan of care. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, in part, of Alzheimer's Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Vitamin Deficiency, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #19's October 2024 physician orders revealed, in part, an order dated 07/31/2024 for heel boots to bilateral extremities (BLE) while in bed. Review of Resident #19's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications were stored in a secured manner for 1 (Resident #27) of 1 (Resident #27) sampled residents reviewed for medication storage. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Storage of Medications policy and procedure revealed, in part, the facility was to store all drugs and biologicals in a safe and secure manner. Further review revealed drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in locked compartments. Review of Resident #27's October 2024 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order for Pro-Stat (a liquid protein supplement) give 1 time per day, and an order for Multivitamin-Minerals (a combination of vitamins and minerals used to treat vitamin deficiency) give 1 tablet two times per day for wound healing. Observation on 10/28/2024 at 9:43 a.m. revealed an unsecured and unattended bottle of Centrum Silver Men 50+ Multivitamin/Multimineral Supplement and Pro-Stat Concentrated Liquid Protein 15 grams (g) per fluid ounce on Resident #27's bedside table. In an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $623K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA