No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mary Goss Nursing Home

3300 White Street, Monroe, LA 71203 · For profit - Corporation · 91 certified beds · (318) 323-9013 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$66,075 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $66,075 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-25)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
3116 Kilpatrick Blvd · (318) 410-9898 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2913 Desiard St · (318) 654-8756 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3001 Renwick St · (318) 323-1170 · Call to confirm hours
Park
University of, Bayou Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.6%17.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder5.6%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection10.0%2.1%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.5%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.7%17.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.4%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.7%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.2%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.3%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.3%22.7%17.1%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.082.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.582.741.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.321.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.29
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
49.0%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 44.3 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-27)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for 1 (#1) of 1 (#1) residents identified at high risk for elopement. The facility failed to ensure all exit doors were secured to prevent residents at risk for elopement from exiting the facility unsupervised and failed to provide continued monitoring after resident #1 was returned to the facility. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 03/15/2024 at 3:30 p.m. when resident #1 (a cognitively impaired resident identified as an elopement risk) was found a 1/2 block away from the facility. Resident #1 was located 10 minutes after he eloped on 03/15/2024 through an unsecured door and was returned to the facility at 3:45 p.m. Resident #1 was located at 3:40 p.m., by a staff member and found in a ditch, sitting in water, and had a laceration to his left eye and bruise to his left shoulder. Resident #1 was returned to the facility by S7 CNA (Certified Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-25 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently by failing to have an adequate system in place to ensure 1(#1) of 1 ((#1) residents who was at high risk for elopement was adequately supervised to prevent Resident #1 from eloping from the facility. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 03/15/2024 at 3:30 p.m. when resident #1 (a cognitively impaired resident identified as an elopement risk) was found a 1/2 block away from the facility. Resident #1 was located 10 minutes after he eloped on 03/15/2024 through an unsecured door and was returned to the facility at 3:45 p.m. Resident #1 was located at 3:40 p.m., by a staff member and was found in a ditch, sitting in water, and had a laceration to his left eye and bruise to his left shoulder. Resident #1 was returned to the facility by S7 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and S1Administrator in the nursing home van and then the resident was sent for evaluation to the local hospital by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an RN (Registered Nurse) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 4 days within the Fiscal Year, Quarter 2 2025 (January 1-March 31). Findings:Review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for FY Quarter 2 2025 (January 1-March 31) revealed there were no consecutive 8 hours of RN coverage for 3 days within the quarter. Review of the RN time cards revealed on 02/01/2025 and 02/02/2025, the RN did not work 8 consecutive hours within the 24 hour period. Further review of the RN time cards revealed no RN worked on 03/05/2025. During an interview on 08/27/2025 at 1:00 p.m. with S1Administrator, he reported he was responsible for completing the PBJ staffing report. S1Administratior reviewed the PBJ for FY Quarter 2 2025 (January 1-March 31). S1Administrator confirmed there was not 8 hours of consecutive RN coverage for 02/01/2025 and 02/02/2025 and no RN worked in the facility on 03/05/2025.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide form CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) 10123- Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) as required for 1 (#31) of 3 (#2, #11 and #31) residents reviewed for SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) Beneficiary Notification. The facility had a census of 37 residents. Findings: A review of Resident #31's SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form revealed the facility initiated the resident's discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted. Resident #31 was discharged from Medicare Part A services on 7/31/2025. Further review of Resident #31's record failed to reveal a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form was provided to the resident. On 08/27/2025 at 10:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2Director of Nursing (DON). S2DON confirmed she was responsible for providing the Beneficiary Notifications (NOMNC forms) to the residents. S2DON stated Resident #31's discharge from therapy was facility initiated and the resident also had skilled benefit days remaining at the time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience for 1 (#44) of 1 (#44) residents reviewed for restraints. The facility failed to 1) obtain a consent, 2) have a physician's order and 3) failed to assess the resident prior to placing the resident in a restraint. Findings:Review of the facility's policy for the Use of Restraints dated April 2017 revealed the following in part:Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptoms and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls.When the use of restraints is indicated, the least restrictive alternative will be used for the least amount of time necessary, and the ongoing re-evaluation for the need for restraints will be documented.Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 (#39) of 2 (#15, #39) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to provide a low air loss mattress for resident #39. Findings:Resident #39Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 05/30/2025 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, and hypertension.Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was unable to be obtained and indicated the resident is severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. Per the MDS, the resident required substantial/maximal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide thickened liquids as ordered by the physician for 1(#18) of 3 (#1, #4, & #18) residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed an initial admit date of 08/20/2018 and a readmit date of 12/19/2023. Further review revealed a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated a yes response for C. Mechanically altered diet-require change in texture of food or liquids (e.g., pureed food, thickened liquids). Further review of the MDS revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which indicated moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Review of the August 2025 physician orders revealed an order for honey/moderately thick consistency liquids. Review of Resident #18's most recent care plan with a review date of 08/14/2025 revealed the resident had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were practiced to provide a safe, sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 1 (#22) of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to store and dispose of suctioning equipment appropriately for Resident #22. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy for Suctioning the Upper Airway (nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal suctioning) revealed the following, in part: General Guidelines: 5. Oropharyngeal suctioning is performed using aseptic technique. Equipment and Supplies6. Curve-tipped #10 to #16 French catheter; with suction control port or adapter (nasopharyngeal) or Yankauer or opened tipped catheter (if oral secretions are thick and copious.) After Suctioning4. Discard water or saline in commode. Dispose of cup in designated receptacle.5. Empty and rinse collection container if necessary or as indicated by facility protocol. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #22 had an initial admission date of 02/15/2017…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 (#1) of 2 (#1 and #2) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. Findings: Review of the Wandering and Elopement and Implementation dated 03/22/2024 revealed the following: Policy Statement: The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement or other safety issues utilizing the Elopement Risk Form, the resident's care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. Review of the medical record revealed resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included myocardial infarction, alcoholic cardiomyopathy, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, acute kidney failure, Stage 3, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Council Meeting minutes and interviews, the facility failed to organize resident group meetings in the facility monthly. Findings: An interview on 07/15/2024 at 2:55 p.m. with resident # 4 revealed the resident council has not had meetings in the last couple of months. Review of the Resident Council Meeting minutes revealed no documentation of resident council meeting minutes since 04/17/2024. An interview on 07/15/2024 at 3:05 p.m. with S15Activity Director confirmed the resident council has not had a meeting since 04/17/2024. An interview on 07/15/2024 at 3:40 p.m. with S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the resident council has not had a meeting since 04/17/2024, and should be done monthly.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to be free from any physical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 2 (31# and #136) of 3 (#27, #31, and #136) residents investigated for restraints. The facility failed to ensure 1) a pre-restraining assessments was completed and the residents' pelvic restraints were identified on their care plans (#31, #136), and 2) that staff properly applied, monitored, and released a pelvic restraint (#136). Findings: Review of the facility's current Restraint Policies and Procedures, Restraint Alternatives, (no date noted) revealed the policies and procedures failed to include guidelines regarding pre-restraint assessments, obtaining consents for restraints, initiating the use of restraints, proper use of restraints, and monitoring restraint use. Resident #31 Review of the record for resident #31 revealed an admission of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to conduct comprehensive assessments including 1) a smoking assessment for 1 (#15) of 1 (#15) resident reviewed for smoking, and 2) a pre-restraint assessment for 1 (#136) of 3 (# 27, #31, and #136) residents investigated for restraints. Findings: Resident #15 Review of the facility Smoking Policy revised 10/2023 revealed the following in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 9. A resident's ability to smoke safely is re-evaluated quarterly, upon a significant change (physical or cognitive) and as determined by the staff. Review of resident #15's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia, anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and dementia. Review of resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 00 which indicated he had severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed he required limited/ 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental, and psychosocial needs. The facilitly failed to ensure 1) residents' care plan were developed for restraints and interventions for pelvic restraints (#31, #136); and 2) residents' care plan was not implemented regarding monitoring for bleeding (#24). Resident #31 Review of the record for resident #31 revealed date of admission on [DATE] with following diagnoses: alcoholic cardiomyopathy, urinary tract infection, metabolic encephalopathy, syphilis,and heart failure. Review of the Annual MDS (Minimal Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #31 was assessed to be severely cognitively impaired and was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Further review of the MDS for resident #31 dated 05/20/2024 revealed the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents' care plans were revised to meet the residents' needs, by failing to ensure the resident's care plan was revised to include all new fall interventions in a timely manner for 2 (#2, and #24) of 4 (#2, #7, #24, and #31) residents reviewed for falls. Findings: Resident #2 Review of the record for resident #2 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, paranoid schizophrenia, spinal stenosis, muscle wasting and atrophy, age-related cognitive decline, hallucinations, generalized anxiety disorder, and osteoporosis. Review of resident #2's 07/05/2024 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, which indicated resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed she required limited to extensive assistance for most activities of daily living. Review of the facility incident report dated 6/20/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 2 (#2, #31) of 4 (#2, #7, #24, and #31) residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure: 1) a thorough investigation was conducted for a resident's falls, staff placed a resident's fall mat in proper place, the resident's care plan was revised to include all new fall interventions in a timely manner, and the fall interventions were appropriate for the type of incident that occurred (#2); and 2) an investigation was conducted for an injury of unknown origin (#31). Findings: Resident #2 Review of the facility policy Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting revised July 2017 revealed the following in part: Policy Statement: All accidents or incidents involving residents occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the administrator. Review of the record for resident #2 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff are able to demonstrate competency in skills necessary to care for resident needs for 3 (#236, #27, and #186) of 3 (#236, #27, and #186) residents records reviewed. The facility failed by 1) not having documentation of sites for administration of insulin and by having omitted medications for resident #236, 2) not having a fall mat and bed alarm in place for resident #27 as ordered by the physician, and 3) not having documentation of accucheck results for resident #186 as ordered by the physician. Findings: Review of the Administering Medication Policy and Procedure revised April 2019, revealed in part 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frames 22. The individual administering the medication initials the resident's MAR on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones. 23. As required or indicated for a medication, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0729 — pattern
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the personnel records, the facility failed to ensure the State Adverse Actions Website checks were completed for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) monthly for 6 (S10CNA, S11CNA, S12CNA, S17CNA, S18CNA, and S19CNA) of 6 (S10CNA, S11CNA, S12CNA, S17CNA, S18CNA, and S19CNA) personnel files reviewed. Findings: Review of S10CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 09/08/2022. Review revealed there was documentation of a State Adverse Actions check on 04/23/2024. Further review revealed there was no documentation of a State Adverse Actions check after the date of 04/23/2024 through the present date of 07/17/2024. Review of S11CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 12/06/1994. Review revealed there was documentation of a State Adverse Actions check on 04/23/2024. Further review revealed there was no documentation of a State Adverse Actions check after the date of 04/23/2024 through the present date of 07/17/2024. Review of S12CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 06/14/2010. Review revealed there was documentation of a State Adverse Actions check on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of the policy, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals are stored in locked compartments by having an open medication cart, unlocked and drawers open with medications in direct view and staff not present. The medication cart was in a place where residents and unauthorized staff could access the medication cart. Findings: Review of facility's policy and procedure for Administering Medications (revised April 2019) revealed the following: During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide. The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering medications, and all outward sides must be inaccessible to residents or others passing by. Observation on 07/17/2024 at 7:08 a.m. revealed the medication cart for hall A was located in the hallway. Further observation revealed the cart was unlocked, and drawers were opened with medications in direct view. No nurse or staff members were present on the hallway at that time. Resident #306 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidence by, 1) having dirty serving trays on a rolling cart, 2) having a grime build up on the kitchen cabinets, shelves, and window ledge, 3) storing an expired nutritional supplement in the refrigerator, and 4) storing food items that belonged to an employee in the storage room and available for resident use. Findings: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 07/15/2024 at 8:10 a.m., an observation revealed a rolling cart located near the steam table. Further observation revealed there were six serving (meal) trays that had old dried food particles on the trays. Further observations revealed there were large amounts of thick, black grime build up on shelves that were located in the bottom and top cabinets throughout the kitchen. The dirty shelves had various cooking pots, pans, and /or eating utensils stored on them. After the initial tour of the kitchen was completed, a tour of the outside storage room revealed one,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of the facility's Infection Control Records, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist, who is responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program, had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings: Review of the facility's Infection Control Records revealed there was no documented evidence the Infection Preventionist, S3Licensed Practical Nurse/Minimum Data Set (LPN/MDS), had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. An interview with S3Licensed Practical Nurse/Minimum Data Set (LPN/MDS) on 7/16/2024 at 1:30 p.m. revealed she had not completed the Infection Preventionist Training. An interview with S2Director of Nursing on 7/17/2024 at 3:10 p.m. confirmed S3LPN/MDS had not completed the Infection Preventionist Training.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical equipment in safe operating condition by having shavings on the manual can opener. Findings: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 07/15/2024 at 8:10 a.m., an observation revealed a large can opener with a buildup of metal shavings on the blade. Further observation revealed S16Dietary [NAME] began opening a large can of canned sweet green peas, for the lunch service. She was notified of the buildup of the metal shavings and confirmed that the can opener blade needed to be cleaned. On 07/15/2024 at approximately 8:45 a.m., S1Administrator was notified of the above findings.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the personnel records and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all required in-service training for Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) included dementia management training for 6 (S10CNA, S11CNA, S12CNA, S17CNA, S18CNA and S19CNA) of 6 (S10CNA, S11CNA, S12CNA, S17CNA, S18CNA, and S19CNA) personnel files reviewed. Findings: Review of S10CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 09/08/2022. Further review revealed there was no documentation of dementia care management training. Review of S11CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 12/06/1994. Further review revealed there was no documentation of dementia care management training. Review of S12CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 06/14/2010. Further review revealed there was no documentation of dementia care management training. Review of S17CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 03/25/2024. Further review revealed there was no documentation of dementia care management training. Review of S18CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 02/08/2024. Further review revealed there was no documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all medical records regarding the resident's code status consistently reflected the resident's wishes for 1 (#2) of 16 residents reviewed in the initial pool screening for advanced directives. Findings: Review of the facility Advance Directive Policy and Procedure revised [DATE] revealed in part: 4. The plan of care for each resident is consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advance directive. 8. Changes or revocations of a directive must be submitted in writing to the administrator. The administrator may require new documents if changes are extensive. The interdisciplinary team will be informed of changes and/or revocations so that appropriate changes can be made in the resident medical record and care plan. Review of resident #2's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, and age-related cognitive decline. Review of resident #2's Annual Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to immediately notify the physician when a resident had a change in condition for 1 (#186) of 1 (#186) residents reviewed for notification of change by, failing to immediately notify the physician when resident #186's accucheck result was greater than 400 milligrams/deciliter. Findings: Review of resident #186's medical record revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy. Review of the July 2024 physician's orders revealed an order dated 07/08/2024 for resident #186 to have Novolog 100 units/milliliter; give 8 units if accucheck greater than 240 and obtain accuchecks twice a day. Review of the care plans revealed a problem onset: 04/05/2022, altered blood sugars due to diabetes. Further review revealed the documented approaches included accuchecks per physician orders, accuchecks twice a day and to notify the physician if glucose is less than 60 or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by staff when staff used profanity and threatening language towards the resident. The incident involved 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's current abuse policy and procedures revealed in part, the following: it is the policy of the facility to assure that its residents are free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse and the misappropriation of property. Verbal aggressive behavior; such as screaming, cursing, bossing around/demanding, insulting to race or ethnic group, intimidation. Following are examples of abuse or neglect by nurse aides: Threatening a resident with harm; yelling at or making fun of a resident. Purpose: to identify any act of abuse in our facility and to assure that it is dealt with in a timely and proper manner. Procedure: any type of abusive act is to be report to the Administrator or the DON (Director of Nursing). If the Administrator or DON is not available, it is to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and incidents for 2 (#1 and #2) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents reviewed for incidents and accidents. The facility failed to ensure resident #1 and #2 received increased supervision after an altercation with each other. Findings: Resident #1 Review of the record for resident #1 revealed an admission date of 02/03/2022 with diagnoses including neuralgia and neuritis, morbid obesity, edema, cerebral infarction due to thrombus of left middle vertebral artery, hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side, and major depressive disorder Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed resident #1 has a history of behavioral symptoms. Review of resident #1's care plan dated 10/22/2023 revealed resident had episodes of verbal and physical abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement the plan of care and follow policy and procedures related to resident refusal of medication. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff reported resident refusal of treatment to their supervisor, director of nurses, physician, or responsible party for 1 (#14) of 23 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the Refusal of Treatment Policy and Procedure revealed in part the following: -when resident refuses a medication, the refusal is to be immediately reported to the witnessing employee's supervisor and the exact refusal documented in the resident's clinical record; and -the physician will be notified as per pharmacy policies and procedures upon refusal of medication, and nurse will inform the DON, Medical Doctor, and responsible party as necessary. Review of the record for resident #14 revealed a readmit date of 10/21/2022 with diagnoses including human immunodeficiency virus, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set for resident #14 revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the pharmacist failed to identify irregularities to the attending physician and the facility's medical director and director of nursing for 2 (#14, #40) of 7 (#6,#9,#11,#14,#18,#34,#40) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and insulin administration. Findings: Resident #14 Review of the record for resident #14 revealed a readmit date of 10/21/2022 with diagnoses including human immunodeficiency virus, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the September 2023 (current) Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 10/21/2022 for Lantus Solostar Pen 100 units/3milliliters- give 22 units into skin nightly (9PM). Review of the August 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed no documentation of Lantus (insulin) Solostar Pen 100 units/milliliters 22 units into skin nightly from 08/01/2023 through 08/29/2023. Review of the Pharmacy Consultant Review dated 08/29/2023 revealed pharmacist reviewed resident #14's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring was recorded for 1(#40) of 5(#9,#11,#18,#34,#40) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. On 09/19/23 at 02:01 p.m., Resident # 40 was observed in his room. Socks and shoes were on both of Resident # 40`s feet. Resident #40 was not sure if his feet had swelling. Record review revealed Resident # 40 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included alcoholic cardiomyopathy, respiratory failure, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease, anemia, alcohol abuse, and syphilis. Review of the most recent minimum data set minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed in section C -Cognitive Status- a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score could not be obtained due to memory problems and his cognitive skills related to daily decision making was moderately impaired. Review of active orders for September and August 2023 included an order for Lasix 40 milligrams (mg) by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation of the medication pass, review of current physician orders, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that it is free from medication error rate of five percent or greater by committing 5 errors out 29 opportunities for an error rate of 17.24%. Findings: Observation of the medication pass on 09/19/2023 at 9:40 a.m. for resident #11 revealed the following medication errors. 1. Arthrotec, (non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory medication) 50mg (milligrams), 1 tablet per Peg Tube (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy) twice daily. This medication was not administered. Review of the September 2023 physician orders for resident #11 revealed an order for Arthrotec 50mg, 1 tablet per PT (Peg Tube) twice daily. Interview on 09/19/2023 at 2:55 p.m. with S6LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed that she did not administer the medication Arthrotec to resident #11. 2. Liquid Protein, 30 cc (cubic centimeter) per Peg Tube twice daily. This supplement was not administered. Review of the September 2023 physician orders for resident #11 revealed an order for Liquid Protein, 30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of the dietary menu, and interviews, the facility to ensure the menu was followed for 6 (#4, #8, #9, #19, #27, and #38) of 6 (#4, #8, #9, #19, #27, and #38) residents who were ordered a pureed diet and received their meals from the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure that mustard greens and cornbread were pureed, available, and offered to the residents with orders for a pureed diet and who received their meals from the kitchen during the lunch service. Findings: Review of the physician orders list revealed residents #4, #8, #9, #19, #27, and #28 were ordered pureed diets. Further review revealed there was no evidence of a reason why the residents should not have pureed mustard greens and pureed cornbread. Review of the dietary menu dated 09/18/2023 revealed the lunch service was to consist of chili beans, creamed potatoes, oven roasted chicken, mixed vegetables, mustard greens, cornbread, and cake. On 09/18/2023 at 11:45 a.m., observation during the lunch service revealed there was no pureed mustard greens and pureed cornbread on the steam table and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute in a sanitary manner. The facility failed to: 1) ensure that foods including ice for resident consumption was stored a refrigerator, deep freezer, and /or ice machine; 2) ensure foods stored in the refrigerator and deep freezer were properly sealed and not exposed to air; 3) ensure the kitchen cabinet doors were cleaned; and, 4) ensure that foods brought into the facility by visitors were not stored inside of the kichen deep freezer. According to review of the Physician Orders List provided by S3Dietary Manager, there was a total of 36 residents that received a meal from the kitchen and could be affected by the above mentioned failed practice. Findings: On 09/18/2023 at 8:20 a.m., observations during the initial tour with S3Dietary Manager, revealed there was old spillage, splatters, and a build-up of grime on the cabinet doors that were located next to the dishwashing machine. One large manual can opener was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-20 · tag F0851 — pattern
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to electronically submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll, to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as required. Findings: Review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Report for FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 3 2023 (April 1-June 30) revealed triggers for the following: Failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours/day. Review of the time and work schedules revealed there were temporary (Temp) workers noted as Licensed Practical Nurses, worked on the dates of 04/01/2023, 04/02/2023, 04/08/2023, 04/09/2023, and 05/06/2023. The dates worked were confirmed by review of the worker's time sheets. On 09/19/2023 at 4:00 p.m., interview with S1Administrator revealed that he (S1Administrator) was responsible for submitting the facility's PBJ information for the nursing staff which included the temporary (Temp) workers for the FY Quarter 3 2023 in April 2023 and May 2023. S1Administrator confirmed he had not included the temporary nursing staff when he submitted the PBJ information for FY…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the personnel records, training records, and interviews, the facility failed to provide the required in-service training for nurse aides that included dementia management training for 6 (S7CNA, S8CNA, S9CNA, S10CNA, S11CNA, and S12CNA) of 6 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) (S7CNA, S8CNA, S9CNA, S10CNA, S11CNA, and S12CNA) reviewed for dementia care training. Findings: Review of the personnel records revealed the following: S8CNA's date of hire: 07/27/2023; S9CNA's date of hire: 05/30/2023; S10CNA's date of hire: 08/22/2016; S11CNA's date of hire: 09/08/2023; and, S12 CNAs date of hire: 06/10/2022. Review of the personnel and training records revealed there was no documented evidence of S8CNA, S9CNA, S10CNA, S11CNA, and S12CNA being provided with dementia management training. On 09/20/2023 at 2:10 p.m. S1Administrator reported that he was responsible for providing dementia care management training to the CNA staff. He confirmed the last time he had provided S8CNA, S9CNA, S10CNA, S11CNA, and S12CNA with dementia management training was December 2021. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$66,075 in federal fines across 7 penalties.

  • $38,805 — penalty dated 2024-03-25
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DAVIS, EDDYEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 07/01/2003
DAVIS, FAITH MARIEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 07/01/2003
HOWELL, MICHELLEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 07/01/2003
WILSON, ANTHONYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL13%since 07/01/2003

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 93%Medicare 5%Other / private 1%

About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$265per resident / day
operating cost
$8,059per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$238per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195596. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next