The Oaks

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 62.8 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-11-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal abuse and mental abuse for 2 (#3 and #5) of 4 (#1, #2, #3 and #5) residents reviewed for abuse; evidenced by resident #4 used sexually inappropriate language and gestures toward resident #3 and resident #5. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for resident #5, who had moderate cognitive impairment, on 10/18/2023 at 1:15 p.m. when resident #4 made an inappropriate sexual comment and gesture to resident #5. This resulted in resident #5 becoming upset and crying. Resident #5 was assisted to her room and was consoled by staff. While being consoled by staff, Resident #5 remained upset and cried for approximatley10 minutes. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for resident #3, who was cognitively intact, on 11/22/2023 at approximately 2:50 p.m. when resident #4 made an inappropriate sexual comment and gesture to resident #3. This resulted in resident #3 feeling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Abbreviations:BIMS- Brief Interview for Mental StatusMDS- Minimum Data SetRP- Responsible PartySSD- Social Services DirectorDON- Director of NursingBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered plan of care by not inviting the resident and/or responsible party to quarterly care plan meetings for 3 (#1, #2, and #3) of 4 sampled residents reviewed.Findings:Resident #1Review of Resident #1's record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified atrial fibrillation, unspecified fractures of ribs right side, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, stroke, hypertension, and age related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture.Review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of the record revealed Resident #1 expired at the hospital on [DATE]. Further review of the record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of injuries of unknown source with serious bodily injury was reported immediately, or within 2 hours of the allegation to the Administrator for 1 (#1) of 4 sampled residents.Findings:Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating Policy and Procedure, revision date [DATE], revealed the following, in part:Policy StatementAll reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported.Policy Interpretation and ImplementationReporting Allegations to the Administrator and Authorities1. If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the risks, benefits and side effects of psychotropic medications for 6 (#19, #38, #25, #30, #43, #5) of 6 (#19, #38, #25, #30, #43, #5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Resident #38 Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed she had an admission date of 03/01/2024 with diagnoses which included anxiety and depression. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #38 received the psychotropic medications Alprazolam 0.25 milligrams (mg) daily and Olanzapine 5 mg daily for the treatment of anxiety and Sertraline 50 mg daily for the treatment of depression. Review of the medical record revealed there was no documentation of a consent for the psychotropic medications. Resident #25 Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis which included depression. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #25 received Trintellix 20 mg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #5: Review of the medical record for sampled Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 02/12/2025. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included shortness of breath, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, anxiety and depression. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the Resident had intact cognition for daily decision making. Review of the June 2025 physician's orders dated 02/12/2025 revealed an order for Alprazolam (Xanax) 0.5 mg to be given every 8 hours as needed for anxiety. Review of the June 2025 MAR revealed Resident #5 received Xanax 0.5 mg prn on 06/07/2025. Review of the April 2025 and May 2025 Consultant Pharmacist DRR revealed the following recommendation for Xanax .5 mg every 8 hours prn: provide specific duration/stop date for the prn psychotropic medication due to the medication is limited to 14 days and requires the prescriber to evaluate the Resident. Further review revealed there was no documentation the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents were in place for 1 (#23) of 5 (#5, #11, #14, #23, #30) residents investigated for accidents. The failed practice was evidenced by Resident #23 being identified as an unsafe smoker, she was observed smoking without a smoking apron, and was observed having smoking articles in her possession without direct supervision. Findings: Review of the facility`s Smoking Policy, with a revision date of June 2024, revealed in part the following: 4. All unsafe smoking residents shall wear a smoking apron while smoking in the designated smoking area. 15. Smoking articles for residents without independent smoking privileges: a. Residents without independent smoking privileges may not have or keep any types of smoking articles except when they are under direct supervision. Record review revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson`s…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0882 — pattern
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist, who was responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program, had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings: Review of the facility's Infection Control Records revealed there was no documented evidence the Infection Preventionist, S5Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. On 06/10/2025 at 9:50 a.m. an interview with S5LPN revealed she did not have any specialized training in infection prevention. On 06/10/2025 at 1:10 p.m. an interview with S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility did not have a nurse that had received specialized training in infection prevention.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #1 Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 03/11/2008 with a diagnosis of spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 which indicated that Resident #15 was cognitively intact. Additionally, the MDS documented that Resident #15 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. On 06/09/2025 at 9:00 a.m. and 4:50 p.m. revealed Resident #1 was observed in her customized wheelchair with her legs dangling with no support noted to her lower extremities. On 06/10/2025 at 10:10 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. revealed Resident #1 was observed in her customized wheelchair with her legs dangling with no support noted to her lower extremities. Review of the current plan of care revealed no documentation related to Resident #1's non-compliance with the use of the wheelchair leg rests. On 06/11/2025 at 11:10 a.m., an interview with S2DON was conducted. S2DON was informed that Resident #1's non-compliance with the use of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it had sufficient nursing staff with appropriate competencies and skills to provide nursing services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident by having staff fail to follow physician orders for 1 (#38) of 6 (#19, #38, #25, #30, #43, #5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The failed practice was also evidenced by staff not implementing physician orders in a timely manner for 1 (#23) of 1 (#23) residents investigated for the use of antibiotics. Findings: Resident #38 Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes. Review of the June 2025 physician orders revealed a finger stick blood sugar (FSBS) check was to be performed 4 times daily and the physician was to be notified if a blood sugar was greater than 301. Review of the blood sugar monitoring revealed the following blood sugar results of 301 or greater. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs by failing to obtain laboratory examinations as ordered by the physician for 1 (#43) of 6 (#19, #38, #25, #30, #43, #5) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Resident #43 Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed he had an admission date of 04/02/2025 with diagnoses which included diabetes, depression, gastroenteritis and colitis. Review of the physician orders revealed the resident received Lexapro 10 milligrams (mg) daily, Lipitor 40 mg daily, and Novolog insulin three times daily and as needed based on blood sugar levels. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 05/03/2025 for the following lab work: Lipids to be drawn annually; Complete Metabolic Panel (CMP) and Complete Blood Count (CBC) to be drawn every 6 months; and a Hemoglobin A1C to be obtained every 3 months. Further review revealed a physician order dated 04/30/2025 to obtain a CBC, CMP, and Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) level.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 (#3) of 3 (#3, #30, and #60) residents investigated for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to prevent pressure ulcers from developing as evidenced by resident #3 having six unidentified pressure ulcers. Findings: Record review revealed resident#3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), cerebral infarction without residual deficits, severe vascular dementia, primary open-angle glaucoma, cerebral palsy and a Stage 4 pressure ulcer of the right hip. During wound care on 06/12/2024 at 8:45 a.m. with S5Wound Care Nurse (WCN) and S6WCN, a visual inspection of resident #3's right feet revealed one deep tissue injury to the posterior area of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$27,005 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $27,005 — penalty dated 2023-11-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $747K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA