No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Courtyard Of Natchitoches

708 Keyser Avenue, Natchitoches, LA 71457 · Government - Hospital district · 112 certified beds · (318) 214-4361 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (318) 214-4361 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (20% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
647 Bienville Cir · (318) 238-5990 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
601 Keyser Ave · (318) 214-5777 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
852 Keyser Ave · (318) 327-8654 · Call to confirm hours
Park
701 E 5th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
461 Jean Marie St · (318) 354-1158

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.2%17.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.7%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.6%2.1%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.9%17.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.6%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.3%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%5.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.5%15.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table32.9%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%3.1%1.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.6%76.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.8%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.5%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.912.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.512.741.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.8%CMS range 35.7–59.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 8.2–17.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting85.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.2–13.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.86
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
19.8%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 85.2 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.86 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-07)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan was reviewed and revised for 1 (#1) of 3 (#2, #3) sampled resident's care plans reviewed. The facility had a total census of 86 according to the Daily Census provided by the facility administrator.Findings:Review of Resident #1's electronic record revealed an admit date of 10/08/2025 with diagnoses including Pulmonary Embolus, Anorexia, Hypertension, Urinary Tract Infection, and Unspecified Dementia. On 03/17/2026 a new diagnosis was added for Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, unstageable.Review of Resident #1's hospice record revealed that a visit was conducted by hospice and a new wound to the sacrum was found. S1 Facility Nurse was present at the time and was made aware of a new wound order for Dakin's gauze to the wound bed.Review of Resident #1's handwritten Physician's Telephone Orders revealed in part:03/14/2026 at 12:30 p.m. Dakin's gauze to wound bed-sacrum written by the hospice nurse.03/16/2026, 4:50 p.m. Turn and reposition side to side only every 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for 1 (#1) of 3 (#2, #3) residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcer/Injury. The facility had a total census of 86 according to the Daily Census provided by the facility administrator.Findings:Review of Resident #1's electronic record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Pulmonary Embolus, Anorexia, Hypertension, UTI (Urinary Tract Infection), and Unspecified Dementia. On 03/17/2026 a new diagnosis was added for Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, unstageable.Review of Resident #1's hospice record revealed that a visit was conducted by hospice and a new wound to the sacrum was found on 03/14/2026. S1 Facility Nurse was present at the time and was made aware of a new wound order for Dakin's gauze to the wound bed.Review of Resident #1's handwritten Physician's Telephone Orders revealed in part:03/14/2026 at 12:30 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure refrigerated food items were covered, labeled, and stored with an open and discard date after opening. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 87 residents that received meals served from the facility's kitchen.Findings: On 01/05/2026 at 8:50 a.m. observations of the facility kitchen accompanied by S14 Dietary, revealed the following:An unsealed, unlabeled package of smoked ham lunch meat;An unsealed bag of lettuce with brown discoloration, and the label on the lettuce was illegible due to moisture;Unpackaged, undated, loose cheese slices; andAn unpackaged, unlabeled block of cheese labeled with a discard date of 01/04/2026.Interview on 01/05/2026 at 08:55 a.m. with S14 Dietary confirmed the above findings. S14 Dietary confirmed that all food stored in the cooler should have been labeled and dated in sealed packages, but were not. S14 Dietary confirmed the expired cheese should have been discarded, but was not.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide education to the resident or resident representative and obtain consent from a resident's responsible party prior to administering the influenza vaccination for 1 (Resident #98) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for influenza vaccines.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pneumonia/Influenza Vaccinations with a revision date of 01/2025 revealed in part.Policy: In keeping with the policies of a hospital as a whole, the facility has adopted the following protocol regarding Pneumonia and Influenza vaccinations. 1. Contact Resident and Family and explain importance of vaccinations. 2. Obtain signed consent from resident and/or family. Review of Resident #98's clinical record revealed an admission date of 04/15/2015 with a re-entry date of 09/04/2025 with diagnoses that included in part.Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 5; End Stage Renal Disease; Pneumonia, Schizophrenia; and Bipolar Disorder. Further review revealed Resident #98's Responsible Party was listed as her Health Care Proxy. Review of Resident #98's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team assessed and determined if a resident was clinically appropriate for self-administration of medication for 1 resident of 1 (Resident #48) sampled residents. Total sample size was 28. Findings: Review of a facility policy titled Resident Self-Administration of Medications with a review date of 02/2025 revealed in part.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 3. If the resident desires to self-administer medications, an assessment is conducted by the interdisciplinary team of the resident's cognitive, physical, and visual ability to carry out this responsibility. 4. The results of the interdisciplinary team assessment are recorded on the Self-Administration Assessment form, which is placed in the resident's medical record. Review of Resident #48's Clinical Record revealed an admit date of 05/12/2025 with diagnoses which included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Primary Insomnia, Depression, and Nicotine Dependence. Review of Resident #48's Quarterly MDS with an ARD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences. The facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #54) of 28 sampled residents was provided a wheelchair appropriate for her size. Findings: Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/26/2024 with diagnoses that included in part.Edema, Quadriplegia Unspecified, Acute Pain, Muscle Spasm, Central Cord Syndrome At Unspecified Level Of Cervical Spinal Cord, and Seizures.Review of Resident #54's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/22/2025 revealed she had a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS revealed Resident #54 had bilateral upper and lower extremity impairments, and used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS revealed Resident #54 required set up or clean up assistance with eating, and was dependent for 2 person assistance with personal hygiene, transfers and toileting.Review of Resident #54's care plan with a Target Date of 01/21/2026 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications by failing to have a documented medical condition and by failing to monitor for side effects and behaviors of psychotropic medications for 1 (Resident #8) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings: Review of a facility policy titled Antipsychotic Drug Use with a revision date of 02/02/2017, revealed in part.Policy: Residents of our facility will not receive unnecessary anti-psychotic drugs.Procedure: Behaviors for which anti-psychotics drugs should not be used include: Insomnia.Review of Resident #8's medical chart revealed an admission date of 07/24/2025 with diagnoses that included in part.Other Unspecified Anxiety Disorder, Insomnia, and Blindness of Both Eyes.Review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/15/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #8 had received an Anti-psychotic with no indication noted.Review of Resident #8's care plan with a Target Date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a newly diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 1 (Resident #11) of 3 residents investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 28 residents.Review of facility policy titled Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program with review date of 01/2025 read in part. This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure the individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. 6. The Social Services Director shall be responsible of keeping track of each residents PASARR screening status, and referring to the appropriate authority. 8. Any level II resident who experiences a significant change in status will be referred promptly to the state mental health or intellectual disability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide care and services that met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure physician's diet orders were followed for 1 (Resident #48) of 1 sampled residents. Total sample size was 28. Findings: Review of Resident #48's Clinical Record revealed an admit date of 05/12/2025 with diagnoses which included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Primary Insomnia, Depression, and Nicotine Dependence. Review of Resident #48's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/19/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #65 was independent for bed mobility, transfers, eating, and toileting. Review of Resident #48's 01/2026 Physician Orders revealed the following, in part:10/22/2025-Regular diet, Regular texture, Regular/Thin consistency-Single cup sips only no straws, no dry or particulate food (bread, rice, etc) for having swallowing problems Review of Resident #48's Care Plan read in part: The resident has Aspiration *NO straws, bread, or rice* (initiated 10/24/2025). Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in a secure manner by failing to ensure medications were not left at the bedside for 1 (Resident #48) resident of 28 sampled residents.Findings: Review of Resident #48's Clinical Record revealed an admit date of 05/12/2025 with diagnoses which included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Primary Insomnia, Depression, and Nicotine Dependence. Review of Resident #48's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/19/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #65 was independent for bed mobility, transfers, eating, and toileting. Further review of the medical record revealed there were no physician's orders to allow Resident #48 to store any medications in the room at the bedside. In an interview and observation on 01/05/2026 at 11:09 a.m. revealed Diclofenac Arthritis Cream placed on Resident #48's bedside table. Resident #48 stated she was running low on this cream and needed some more. In an interview and observation on 01/07/2026 at 11:13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor and accommodate food preferences for 2 (Resident #5 and Resident #29) of the 7 residents reviewed for dining. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 87 residents who consumed meals from the kitchen.Review of facility policy titled Promoting/Maintaining Resident Self-Determination dated 04/2025 read in part. It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights by facilitating resident self-determination through support of resident choice. The facility will ensure that each resident has the opportunity to exercise his/her autonomy regarding those things that are important in his/her life such as interest and preferences. 9. The facility will accommodate the resident preferences to the extent possible and as agreed upon by the resident sponsor and physician. Resident #5Review of Resident #5's electronic medical record revealed an initial admission date of 06/09/2016 with diagnoses that included, in part, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, Anxiety Disorder, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of medical records for 1 (Resident R5) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident R5) sampled residents.Review of the facility's policy entitled Sanctions for (facility name) to Comply to HIPAA Privacy Standards revised 06/2016 revealed, in part.all workforce members are required to adhere to the HIPPA Privacy Standards and prevent unauthorized disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI). Workforce members will protect health information from unauthorized disclosure. Leaving PHI in public areas is a violation of HIPPA Privacy Standards.Observation of Hall B on 09/16/2025 at 8:55 a.m. revealed Cart X was unattended, with the electronic medical record (EMR) screen open and Resident R5's PHI visible. The surveyor remained with Cart X until a staff member approached Cart X. The staff member identified herself as S7LPN.Interview with S7LPN on 09/16/2025 at 8:57 a.m. revealed she left Cart X unattended on Hall B, with Resident R5's PHI visible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure Cart X was locked and medications were stored in a safe and secure manner.Review of the facility's policy entitled Medication Storage revised 03/2025 revealed, in part.It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored to ensure security. All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments. During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart.Observation of Hall B on 09/16/2025 at 8:55 a.m. revealed Cart X was unattended, and unlocked, with 3 of 8 drawers pulled open. This surveyor remained with Cart X until a staff member approached Cart X. The staff member identified herself as S7LPN.Interview with S7LPN on 09/16/2025 at 8:57 a.m. revealed Cart X was unattended and unlocked on Hall B, with 3 drawers pulled open. S7LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. The facility failed to ensure documentation on the Medication Administration Report (MAR) was accurate for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #4) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident R5) sampled residents. Review of the facility's policy entitled Administration of Medicines revised 03/2025 revealed, in part.the facility is to maintain a record of all medications administered. Staff is to time and initial each medication on the MAR after the medication is given.Review of the facility's policy entitled Medication Administration Electronic Documentation revised 03/2025 revealed, in part.Every resident has an electronic Medication Administration Record (E-MAR) for the purpose of proper administration and recording of all medications. The E-MAR is a permanent, legal document and is a part of the Electronic Health Record. Resident #2Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an initial admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation of property/funds for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for misappropriation. The facility failed to prevent misappropriation of Resident #1's funds by S7 Rehab Tech. Findings: Review of a facility policy on 06/09/2025 at 9:18 a.m. titled, Abuse Protection and Prevention Program with a revision date of 02/2013 revealed the following in part .Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect and misappropriation of resident property. Misappropriation of property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed a re-entry admission date of 05/07/2024, with diagnoses that included in part . Fusion of Spine of the Cervical Region, Seizures, Quadriplegia, and Depression. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/23/2025 revealed a BIMS score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an investigation of an allegation of misappropriation of resident property/funds was thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for misappropriation. Findings: Review of a facility policy on 06/09/2025 at 9:18 a.m. titled, Abuse Protection and Prevention Program with a revision date of 02/2013 revealed the following in part . Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect and misappropriation of resident property. D. Timely and thorough investigations of all reports and allegations of abuse. Misappropriation of property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. 10. Upon receiving information concerning a report of abuse, the director of nursing will designate an associate to monitor the resident's emotions concerning the incident as well as the resident's reactions to his/her involvement in the investigation to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience for 2 (#1, #3) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for restraints. The facility failed to ensure: 1. A physician's order was obtained, a consent was signed and a risk assessment was completed for a Geri-chair for Resident #1, 2. A physician's order was obtained, a consent was signed and a risk assessment was completed for a pommel cushion for Resident #3, and 3. A restraint policy was developed. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedures failed to reveal a policy for restraints and bed rails. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical records revealed an admit date of 01/16/2025 with the following diagnoses, including in part: infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee prosthesis/subsequent encounter, chronic kidney disease stage 2 (mild), and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to: 1) ensure residents had a physician's order for side rails, 2) obtain informed consent from the resident or resident's representative for side rail use, and/or 3) assess residents for the risk of entrapment from bed rails and 4) ensure a policy was developed for the use of bed rails prior to the installation of bed rails for 3 (#1, #2, #3) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for bed rails. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedures failed to reveal a policy for bed rails. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical records revealed an admit date of 01/16/2025 with the following diagnoses, including in part: infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee prosthesis/subsequent encounter, chronic kidney disease stage 2 (mild), and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#1) out of 2 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Findings: Review of Facility's Wound Care Documentation (reviewed 01/2025) revealed: .Wound documentation on all other existing and/or new wounds will be made once a week in the resident care notes. Review of Facility's Staging of Pressure Wounds (revised 03/2013 and reviewed 02/2025) revealed: Purpose: To manage impaired skin integrity as it relates to pressure ulcers. Policy: II. Status and condition of pressure ulcers should be assessed upon admission, if pressure ulcer noted, weekly assessment by treatment nurse. Location, stage, type of wound, width, length, depth, exudate, odor, presence of necrotic or granulation tissue, and condition of surrounding skin should be documented. VIII. Chart in patient's record, weekly. Review of Facility's Wound Care Procedure for Major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all medical records regarding the resident's code status consistently reflected the resident's current wishes for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Medical Directives with a review date of 01/2024 read in part: Section II. General: 3) Documentation that addresses advance directives must be placed in the patient's medical record; 6) The physician must inform the patient . and seek agreement on a mutually acceptable plan of care. Section III. A.) At the time of admission via the admitting department or the emergency department, the patient and/or significant other will be: 2) Asked by the hospital personnel if he/she has an AMD (Advanced Medical Directive) . this response will be documented in the medical record . Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/21/2024, with diagnoses that included in part . Cerebral Infarction, Urinary Tract Infection, Dysphagia, Aphasia, Essential (Primary)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's change in condition was immediately reported for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, & #3) sampled residents, as evidenced by S4CNA and S5CNA failing to timely notify the nurse when Resident #1's leg made an audible popping sound while being repositioned by staff. Findings: On 12/03/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Accidents and Incidents last reviewed on 01/2024 revealed in part .Any employee witnessing an accident or incident involving a resident, employee, or visitor, must report such occurrence to the charge nurse as soon as possible regardless of how minor it may be, to include the following: a. Any resident fall, accident or injury . e. Any other unusual or unexpected event involving a resident. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/10/2017 with diagnoses that included: Displaced Spiral Fracture of Shaft of Left Femur, Atrial Fibrillation, Unspecified Dementia, and Osteoporosis. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to use a mechanical lift, as determined necessary by the resident's person centered plan of care, during a transfer from bed to wheelchair for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. Findings: On 12/03/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Proper Transferring of Non-Weight Bearing Residents last reviewed on 01/2024 revealed in part . In order to properly transfer any non-weight bearing resident (example: from bed to chair, chair to bed, or to whirlpool, etc.) a lift is to be utilized. As a matter of precaution, two people are required in order to safely move the resident. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/10/2017 with diagnoses that include Displaced Spiral Fracture of Shaft of Left Femur, Atrial Fibrillation, Unspecified Dementia, and Osteoporosis. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/04/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to keep the residents' equipment in good repair. The facility failed to repair wheelchair arm rest cushions for 5 (#19, #40, #47, #49, #67) out of 44 total sampled residents. Findings: Observation of Resident #19 sitting in wheelchair on 09/23/2024 at 10:15 a.m. revealed both wheelchair arm cushions were peeling and in disrepair. Observation of Resident #40 on 09/23/2024 at 11:36 a.m. revealed the resident's wheelchair arm cushions in disrepair. Resident # 40's son stated the wheelchair had been like that for about 6-8 months. Observation of Resident #49's wheelchair on 09/23/2024 at 11:38 a.m. revealed Resident #49's arm chair cushions in disrepair. Observation of Resident #47 on 09/23/2024 at 12:06 p.m. sitting in wheelchair revealed Resident #47's arm cushions of wheelchair in disrepair. Observation of Resident #67's wheelchair on 09/23/2024 at 12:15 p.m. revealed a crack in one arm of Resident # 47's wheelchair cushion. Environmental rounds observed with S2 DON on 09/25/2024 at 2:45 p.m. revealed Residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines. The facility failed to follow the menu in regard to portion size to ensure nutritional adequacy of the meal for 10 ( #10, #25, #34, #41, #51, #52, #78, #85, #92, and #295) out of 13 (#2, #10, #25, #34, #35, #41, #50, #51, #52, #78, #85, #92, and #295) residents who received pureed meals served by the facility kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's approved Patient Menu revealed the facility was on week 4, cycle day 23. Lunch menu consisted of: Chicken Spaghetti, [NAME] Beans, Pineapple Tidbits, Honey Wheat Roll, and Unsweetened Iced Tea. Serving size for pureed meal read as follows: Pureed Chicken Spaghetti- ¾ cup (6oz) Ladle/Spoodle. Pureed [NAME] Beans- ½ cup (4oz) Ladle/Spoodle. Pureed Peaches- ½ cup (4oz) Ladle/Spoodle. Observation on 09/23/2024 at 10:45 a.m. of the lunch meal service revealed S7 Kitchen Lead obtained 4oz Ladles/Scoops to serve meal food items. Interview at time of observation with S7 Kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to a resident or his/her responsible party prior to the discontinuation of Medicare Part A services for 3 (#33, #44, & #197) of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. Findings: Review of the SNF Beneficiary Review forms completed by the facility for Residents #33, #44, and #197 revealed a NOMNC, Form CMS-10123 was not issued prior to their discharge from Medicare Part A services. In an interview at 9:34 a.m. on 09/24/2024, S4 SW (Social Worker) stated she did not issue a NOMNC/Form CMS-10123 to Residents #33, #44, and #197 prior to their discharge from Part A services. S4 SW confirmed the three residents all had benefit days remaining. S4 SW stated she was not aware the NOMNC/Form CMS-10123 needed to be issued to them.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to develop the resident's comprehensive plan of care for 1 (#37) of 44 sampled residents by failing to develop a Hospice Care Plan for Resident #37. Findings: Review of Resident #37's clinical record revealed an admit date of 09/13/2016, with a Hospice admit date of: 07/22/2024. Resident #37's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of unspecified lower limb, end stage renal disease, heart disease; cerebral infarction; dependence on renal dialysis; age-related physical debility; hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting unspecified side. Review of Resident #37's Significant Change MDS with an ARD of 07/31/2024, revealed a BIMS score that was not assessed because the resident was rarely or never understood. Resident #37 had impairment on both sides for lower and upper extremities; used a wheelchair. Resident #37 was dependent for eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene; showering/ bathing, upper body and lower body dressing and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #37's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to revise the care plan to include new fall interventions after a resident fell attempting to get in bed for 1 (#54) of 3 (#13, #54 and #59) resident's care plans reviewed. Findings: Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #54 had diagnoses that included in part . Dizziness and Giddiness, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Acute Exacerbation, Chronic Kidney Disease, Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease, and Pain. Review of Resident #54's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 08/21/2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #54 used a wheelchair for mobility. Review of Resident #54's current comprehensive care plan with a target date of 11/13/2024, revealed Resident #54 is at moderate risk for falls related to gait and/or balance problems. The care plan included in part .Last fall 1/31/24 without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards of practice for 1 (#28) of 44 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure physician's orders for Resident #28 were followed. Findings: Review of resident #28's medical record revealed an admit date of 12/20/2022 with diagnoses that included in part .Osteoporosis, Unspecified Fracture of Right Wrist and Hand, Anemia, and Pain. Review of Resident #28's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/26/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #28's Progress note dated 09/20/2024 by S16 MD revealed in part . Assessment Plan: 1. Back pain/Osteoarthritis: Patient wants to try to increase Duloxetine (Cymbalta) to help with pains. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed a telephone order dated 09/20/2024 which read: Change Duloxetine to 60mg daily. The order was signed by S16 MD and S15 LPN on 09/20/2024. Review of Resident #28's MAR for September 2024 revealed the resident was not receiving Duloxetine 60 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 2 (#11, #195) of 5 (#2, #11, #37, #77, & #195) residents reviewed for nutrition by failing to follow or implement registered dietitian's recommendations. Findings: Resident #11 Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admit date of 08/19/2022 with diagnoses that included .Chronic kidney disease, Stage 3, COPD, Chronic Non-pressure Ulcers of Lower Legs and Left Foot and Heart Failure. Review of Resident #11's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/02/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 6, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #11 required set up assistance with eating. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was care planned for a heart healthy, regular texture diet. Interventions included: Refer to Dietician as needed, provide diet as ordered, and monitor and record weight per orders and/or policy. Review of Resident #11's progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency in skills necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through observation of delayed call light response for 1 (#67) of 44 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure timely call light response for Resident #67. Findings: Review of Resident #67's clinical record revealed an admit date of 06/20/2024, with diagnoses which included weakness, Dementia in other diseases; Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms; urinary tract infection; and anemia. Review of Resident #67's Significant Change MDS with an ARD date of 07/22/2024, revealed a BIMS score of 10; moderately impaired. Resident #67 uses a walker and wheelchair. Resident #67 required setup or clean up assistance with eating; Supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene; substantial/maximal assist with toileting hygiene, shower/bathing; and partial moderate assist with personal hygiene. Resident #67 required Partial/Moderate assist with chair/bed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor and accommodate resident food allergies, intolerances, and preferences by failing to ensure 1 Resident (#2) was not provided a supplement with milk containing products. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 94 Residents that resided at the facility. Findings: Record Review of Resident #2's electronic medical record revealed an admit date of 04/03/2024. Resident #2 had diagnoses that included in part . Cough, Unspecified Bacterial Pneumonia, Dysphagia, Contracture of Muscle-Unspecified Site, and Cerebral Palsy. Record Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 06/19/2024 revealed Resident had impaired memory and severely impaired cognitive skills. Resident #2 was dependent on staff for all ADL's. Record Review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan with initiated date of 07/09/2024 revealed in part . Food intolerance. Lactose/Dairy products with intervention of: provide nondairy alternatives. Record Review of Resident #2's Current Physician Orders revealed in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure refrigerated food items were covered, labeled, and stored with an open date after opening. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 92 Residents that received meals served in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled Food Storage dated 01/2024 read in part . Food is stored immediately after receipt and maintained in a manner that prevents damage, spoilage, infestation, and bacterial contamination. Observation of kitchen on 09/23/2024 at 8:45 a.m. accompanied by S7 Kitchen Lead revealed there was an open block of cheese on the refrigerator shelf that was uncovered, open to air, and undated, and a cup of oranges that was uncovered, open to air, and undated. Interview on 09/24/2024 at the time of the observations accompanied by S7 Kitchen Lead, confirmed the above findings. S7 Kitchen Lead confirmed all opened food items should be covered and dated, but had not been.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care, for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, & #3) sampled residents reviewed for hydration and nutrition. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident #1 received nutritional supplements as ordered; 2. Ensure the RD's (Registered Dietician) dietary recommendation to increase Resident #1's calories and protein through a nutritional supplement was implemented; and 3. Ensure Resident #1's meal intake was documented for each meal, as care planned. Findings: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 12/29/2008, with diagnoses that included in part .Cerebral Palsy, Unspecified Bacterial Pneumonia, Dysphagia, Contracture of muscle, Altered Mental Status, Convulsions, Dehydration, Weight Loss, and Pain. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/31/2024, revealed a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out ADLs received the necessary services to maintain good oral hygiene for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, & #3) sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. Findings: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 12/29/2008 with diagnoses that included in part .Cerebral Palsy, Unspecified Bacterial Pneumonia, Dysphagia, Contracture of Muscle, Altered Mental Status, Convulsions, and Pain. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/31/2024 revealed a BIMS was not conducted because the resident was rarely or never understood. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 required extensive assistance by two persons with bed mobility and transferring and was totally dependent on one person with eating and toilet use. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 was dependent with oral hygiene, the helper does all of the effort, and the resident does none of the effort to complete the activity. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by staff for 2 (#2, #4) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, & #4) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Reporting Protocol revealed in part . Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting harm or pain or mental anguish, or deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods, or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Identification, Protection, and Reporting revealed in part . 5. b. Verbal abuse is defined as any use of oral, written or gestured language that includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, to describe residents, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admit date of 05/06/2022 with diagnoses that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility failed to ensure that resident calls for help were answered timely, and that the need was met when a resident called for help. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 97 residents residing in the facility. Findings: An interview on 08/14/2023 at 9:55 a.m. with Resident #90 revealed she had to wait for over an hour at times for help after using the call bell. Resident #90 stated weekend staff call in often and she felt the facility is short staffed at times. Resident #90 stated she had notified management about the call light issues in the past. A review of Resident #90's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    FACILITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored under proper temperature controls for 2 (Medication Refrigerator A, Medication Refrigerator B) of 2 medication refrigerators observed out of a total of 3 medication refrigerators. Findings: In an observation on 08/16/2023 at 7:45 a.m. of Medication Refrigerator A with S4 RN Charge Nurse revealed the refrigerator contained resident medications. Observation of Medication Refrigerator A's temperature log at that time revealed the temperatures were not monitored for 7 days in August of 2023. In an interview at that time, S4 RN Charge Nurse stated the night nurses are supposed to monitor the refrigerator temperatures each night and confirmed they had not. In an observation on 08/16/2023 at 7:50 a.m. of Medication Refrigerator B with S4 RN Charge Nurse revealed the refrigerator contained multiple resident medications. Observation and interview with S4 RN Charge Nurse at that time of Medication Refrigerator B's temperature log revealed the temperatures were not monitored for 7 days in August…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to formulate an advanced directive was properly reflected in the resident's record for 2 (#19, #57) of 3 (#19, #52,#57) residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility failed to ensure all records regarding code status consistently reflected the resident's wishes. Findings: Resident #19 Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admit date of [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Chronic Venous Hypertension, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Myopathy, and Essential Hypertension. Review of Resident #19's 08/2023 Physician's orders revealed an order dated [DATE] read Do Not Resuscitate. Review of Resident #19's Face Sheet listed a resuscitation status of Full Code- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). Review of Resident #19's headboard on the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed a resuscitation status of CPR. An Interview on [DATE] at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician timely when there was a change in the resident's physical condition after a recent fall, for 1 (#12) of 4 (#12, #18, #33, #93) residents reviewed for accidents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Notification of Physician/Family revealed in part . Courtyard of Natchitoches will in effect notify the resident's physician/resident's legal representative when the following occurs: 1. An accident involving the resident which results in injury and has the potential for requiring physician intervention. 2. A significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admit date of 04/27/2022, with diagnoses that included in part . Abnormal weight loss, Fracture of shaft of left femur, Anxiety disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #12's Annual MDS with an ARD of 06/07/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 0, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to document and resolve grievances for 1 (#84) of 1 resident reviewed for grievances. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Filing Grievances/Complaints revealed in part . Our facility will assist residents, their representatives (sponsors); other interested family members, or resident advocates in filing grievances or complaints when such requests are made. 1. Any resident, his/her representative (sponsor), family member, or appointed advocate may file a grievance or complaint concerning treatment, medical care, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, etc., without fear of threat or reprisal in any form. 2. . 3. Grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally or in writing. A grievance log will be kept in the office of the Director of Nursing and all grievances will be recorded in this log. A brief notation of the intervention and the follow-up will also be recorded. 4. The Administrator and the Director of Nursing have the responsibility of grievance and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services that met professional standards of quality, by failing to promptly assess a resident after she fell and hit her head, for 1 resident (#18) in a total sample of 25 residents. Findings: The Facility's Policy titled Fall Policy/Risk Assessment read in part .Post-fall management: (2) the nurse will notify the physician promptly and note and implement diagnostic or treatment interventions ordered. Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Tremor unspecified, Repeated Falls, Pain in left foot, Chronic Migraine, Retention of Urine, Pain in the right shoulder and Subdural Hematoma. Review of Resident #18's DPE MDS with an ARD of 07/25/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 14 (indicating intact cognition). The MDS revealed Resident #18 was coded as requiring one person physical assistance for transfers, personal hygiene and bed mobility; and extensive assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the Facility failed to ensure that Residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. The Facility failed to provide trimmed fingernails to dependent Residents for 1 (Resident #67) of 5 (Resident #67, Resident #1, Resident #39, Resident #21 and Resident #84) Residents sampled for ADL's. Total sample size was 24. Findings: Review of Resident #67's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/02/2021 with diagnoses which included: Parkinson's Disease, Dementia and repeated falls. Review of Resident #67's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 07/26/2023 revealed Resident #67 had a BIMS score of 11 (indicating moderately impaired cognition), required one person physical assistance for bathing and one person extensive assistance for personal hygiene. Review of Resident #67's care plan with a review date of 10/26/2023 revealed a need for grooming and personal hygiene and the need for staff to assist with approaches to monitor and clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 1 (Resident #63) of 1 Residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #63's respiratory equipment was properly changed, labeled and stored. Total sample size was 24. Findings: Facility's Policy on Oxygen Administration read in part . change nebulizer tubing and delivery device on a weekly basis. Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed a diagnoses of Shortness of Breath and Resident #63 received Budesonide 0.25 MG/2 ML suspension one vial per nebulizer two times a day (breathing treatment). Observation and interview on 08/14/2023 at 9:30 a.m. revealed a nebulizer mouth piece lying in Resident #63's bedside drawer in a cup, uncovered and undated. Resident #63 stated she used the nebulizer daily. Observation on 08/15/2023 at 8:25 a.m. revealed a nebulizer mouth piece lying in Resident #63's bedside drawer in a cup, uncovered and undated. Observation and interview on 08/15/2023 at 9:50 a.m. accompanied by S3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who use psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions for 1 (#12) of 5 (#12, #18, #47, #84, #93) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admit date of 04/27/2022 with diagnoses that included in part .Abnormal weight loss, Fracture of shaft of left femur, Anxiety disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #12's physician' orders revealed the following: 08/10/2023: Norco 5-325 mg tablet, one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed 07/12/2023: Paroxetine HCL 40 mg by mouth every day 07/12/2023: Quetiapine Fumarate 25 mg by mouth daily 07/12/2023: Quetiapine Fumarate 50 mg by mouth at bedtime 07/12/2023: Trazodone 50 mg by mouth every night at bedtime 07/12/2023: Buspar 10 mg by mouth three times a day Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed the resident was care planned for the use of psychotropic drugs. Review of the care plan revealed interventions that included pharmacy consultant to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free of significant medication errors for 1 (#86) of 4 residents observed during medication administration pass. The facility failed to ensure medication administered to Resident #86 was the correct medication as ordered by the physician. The facility had a total census of 97 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Administration of Medicines revealed in part . Procedure: B. Administration of medication (5 rights) 1. Check physician's order for medication name, dosage, route, and frequency or time ordered. 2. Check medication label on unit dose pack or medication box for correct name and dosage. 3. Check MAR for time last dose given. 4. Identify patient before administering medication. During an observation of medication administration pass on 08/15/2023 at 8:00 a.m., S5 LPN administered Abiraterone (a hormone based chemotherapy used to treat prostate cancer) 250mg by mouth to Resident #86. Review of Resident #86's medical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CORKERN, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2021
HALM, WAYNEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/27/2024
INGRAM, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2021
JONES, VALENCIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/15/2022
LUSTER, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2021
MOFFETT, HENRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/28/2024
NEWTON, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2021
SOILEAU, DAMIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195213. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next