No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ferncrest Manor Living Center

14500 Haynes Blvd., New Orleans, LA 70128 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 200 certified beds · (504) 246-1426 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$282,413 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $282,413 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-26)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
5991 Bullard Ave Ste B · (504) 244-0511 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6000 Bullard Ave · (504) 434-6269 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7050 Bullard Ave · (504) 241-3323 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Nature Center Dr · (504) 658-3000 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
13123 I-10 Service Rd · (504) 246-5121

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.6%17.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.4%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.4%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%2.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.2%17.9%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.9%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.3%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.0%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.7%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.0%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.3%3.1%1.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine16.7%76.3%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.522.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.822.741.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. Inspectors cited this home for failing to submit its staffing data to CMS (F0851) — see the citation below; CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-20)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff provided basic life support, including Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation(CPR) per the facility's policy and procedure, to a resident requiring emergency care according to the resident's advance directive and physician's order for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) sampled residents. On [DATE], at approximately 11:48 p.m., an Immediate Jeopardy occurred for Resident #1 when the resident, who was a full code, did not receive CPR upon being found pulseless, breathless, and unresponsive. Review of Resident #1's Power of Attorney's (POA) video camera footage of Resident #1's room on [DATE] from 11:48 p.m. through [DATE] at 12:03 a.m. revealed S4RespiratoryTherapist (RT) and S5RegisteredNurse(RN) were present in Resident #1's room throughout his medical emergency and chest compressions were not initiated until [DATE] at 12:03 a.m. Resident #1 was transported to the hospital and was admitted . Hospital records,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, facility document reviews, and facility policy reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from staff physical and verbal abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm on 11/19/2024when Resident #1 was physically abused by S2Maintenance and sustained injuries to his right face and left hand, which resulted in pain. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, last revised on 07/25/2023 revealed, in part, residents have the right to be free from verbal, mental, and physical abuse. Review of Resident #1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #1 had diagnoses, which included, blindness to both eyes and a conduct disorder (a behavioral and emotional disorder that presented as repetitive, disruptive and violent behavior). Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program.Findings:Review of the facility's Pest and Insect Control Policy & Procedure revised August 2025 revealed, in part, an effective, regular basic pest control program was maintained so the facility may be free of pests and rodents. Further review revealed the following:All garbage and refuse was to be disposed of properly. The garbage storage area was to be maintained in a sanitary condition to prevent harborage and feeding of pests. Garbage containers are covered when removed from the kitchen area to the disposal area. All garbage should be brought out after every meal. The waste disposal company was responsible for dumpster pick up. Pest control contractors were to come to the facility once a month. If needed, the contractor would come to the facility more frequently or in an emergency. Maintenance employees were to check for pests, rodents and insects during walk throughs, and bug light trap pads should be changed every Tuesday. When there was a report of any type…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide silverware at meal service.Findings:Observation on 05/19/2026 at 11:28AM revealed 15 unidentified residents ate lunch in the dining room. Further observation revealed the 15 residents were provided with disposable cutlery.On 05/19/2026 at 10:30AM a Resident Council meeting was held with Resident #11, Resident #27, Resident #55, Resident #89, and Resident #136.In an interview on 05/19/2026 at 10:57AM, Resident #11 indicated they were almost always provided disposable cutlery for meal service.In an interview on 05/19/2026 at 10:58AM, Resident #136 indicated they were almost always provided disposable cutlery for meal service.In an interview on 05/19/2026 at 10:58AM, Resident #11 indicated he did not like to use a disposable knife during meals. Resident #11 further indicated it was difficult to cut food with a disposable knife.In an interview on 05/19/2026 at 11:00AM, Resident #136 indicated she did not care to use disposable cutlery for meals. Resident #136 indicated there have been times when the disposable fork had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a system to accurately reconcile controlled substances for 4 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c, Medication Cart d) of 4 sampled medication carts reviewed for controlled substance documentation requirements. Findings:Review of the facility's Controlled Substances policy and procedure, dated 09/01/1994, and revised on 06/11/2025, revealed, in part, controlled medications were counted at the end of each shift. Further review revealed the nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty determined the count together. Review of the facility's May 2026 Medication Cart a Narcotic Nurse Sign Off Log revealed, in part, there was no signature that indicated the off going nurse had reconciled Medication Cart a's controlled substances with the oncoming nurse on:- 05/06/2026 for the 7:00PM to 7:00AM shift; - 05/10/2026 for the 7:00AM to 7:00PM shift; and,- 05/12/2026 for the 7:00AM to 7:00PM shift.Further review revealed there was no signature that indicated the oncoming nurse had reconciled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to:1. Ensure insulin (a medication that lowers blood glucose) multi-dose flex pens were dated when opened and/or removed from refrigerated storage or discarded as required (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c, Medication Cart d); and,2. Ensure opened, unpackaged, and/or unlabeled medication was not stored inside a medication cart (Medication Cart a).This deficient practice was identified for 4 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c, Medication Cart d) of 4 sampled medication carts observed for medication storage requirements. Findings:1.Review of the facility's Administering Medications policy and procedure, dated [DATE] and revised on [DATE], revealed, in part, when opening a multi dose container, the date the medication was opened should be recorded on the container. Review of the facility's Insulin Pen Administration policy and procedure, dated [DATE] and revised on [DATE], revealed, in part,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to:1. Ensure staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while performing care for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (Resident #4, Resident #37); and,2. Ensure staff completed hand hygiene and wore proper PPE during the administration of an injection (Resident #131).This deficient practice was identified for 3 (Resident #4, Resident #37, Resident #131) of 6 sampled residents observed for infection control practices. Findings:Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy and procedure, dated 04/01/2024 and revised on 05/05/2025, revealed, in part, EBP was utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms to residents. Further review revealed EBPs employed targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions did not otherwise apply. Further review revealed examples of high contact resident care activities which required the use of gown and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' tube feeding pumps were clean and sanitary for 3 (Resident #4, Resident #35, Resident #106) of 33 sampled residents reviewed for environmental concerns during the initial pool observations. Findings: Review of the facility's Homelike Environment policy and procedure, dated [DATE] and revised on [DATE], revealed, in part, residents were provided with a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Further review revealed the facility staff maximized to the extent possible, a clean, sanitary and orderly environment. Resident #4 Observation on [DATE] at 1:20PM revealed the base of Resident #4's tube feeding pole and the surrounding floor was covered with an unidentified dried tan substance. Further observation revealed an unidentified dried sticky tan substance was present on the side and top of Resident #4's tube feeding pump. Observation on [DATE] at 10:40AM revealed numerous spots, varying in size, of an unidentified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-20 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure certified nursing assistants (CNAs) were provided Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training for 5 (S13CNA, S14CNA, S15CNA, S16CNA, S17CNA) of 5 sampled CNAs reviewed for QAPI training requirements.Findings:Review of facility's training policy and procedure, with a revision date of 05/05/2025, revealed, in part, upon hire and prior to performing any functions of their position, each new employee and volunteer will be trained and oriented in accordance with state and federal regulations, as well as company policy and procedure. Review of S13CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, S13CNA had a hire date of 01/12/2026. Further review revealed no documented evidence S13CNA had received QAPI training, as required. Review of S14CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, S14CNA had a hire date of 02/25/2026. Further review revealed no documented evidence S14CNA had received QAPI training, as required. Review of S15CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, S15CNA had a hire date of 09/30/2025. Further review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide privacy for a resident during incontinence care for 2 (Resident #4, Resident #95) of 2 sampled residents observed during incontinence care. Findings:Review of the facility's undated Resident Rights policy and procedure revealed, in part, employees should treat all residents with respect and dignity. Further review revealed all residents had the right to privacy and confidentiality. Resident #4Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/16/2026 revealed, in part, Resident #4 did not have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score completed due to Resident #4 not being able to be understood or understand others. Further review revealed Resident #4 was dependent on staff assistance for toileting hygiene. Observation on 05/18/2026 at 9:42AM revealed S18Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and S19CNA entered Resident #4's room to perform incontinence care while Resident #4's roommate, Resident #95, remained in the room. Further observation revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure fall risk assessments were completed and new individualized fall prevention interventions were implemented to prevent future falls for 3 (Resident #108, Resident #112, Resident #142) of 3 sampled residents investigated for falls. Findings: Review of the facility's Resident Incident/Accident/Falls policy and procedure, dated 09/01/1994 and revised on 05/13/2025, revealed, in part, if falling occurred despite initial interventions, staff would implement additional or different interventions, or indicate why the current approach remained relevant. Further review revealed the nursing supervisor on duty at the time should compete an incident report for resident falls no later than 24 hours after the fall occurred. Further review revealed when a resident fell, a falls risk assessment and the appropriate interventions taken to prevent future falls would be recorded in the resident's medical record. Review of the facility's Fall Risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who received psychotropic medications were monitored for potential adverse consequences associated with the use of psychotropic medications for 3 (Resident #10, Resident #115, Resident #149) of 5 sampled residents investigated for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of the facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy and procedure, dated 09/01/1994 and revised on 05/13/2025, revealed, in part, psychotropic medications were any medication that affected brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior. Further review revealed the following medications were considered psychotropic medications and were subject to monitoring: antipsychotics, antidepressants and antianxiety medications. Further review revealed psychotropic medication management involved the adequate monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences. Further review revealed residents receiving psychotropic medications were monitored for side effects and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a resident's wheelchair in a safe working condition for 1 (Resident #91) of 5 residents reviewed for environment.Findings:Review of Resident #91's records revealed, in part, an admit date of 05/19/2025. Review of Resident #91's diagnoses revealed, in part, Resident #91 was diagnosed with lack of coordination, morbid (severe) obesity, right heart failure, and shortness of breath. Review of Resident #91's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/23/2026 revealed, in part, Resident #91 required the use of a manual wheelchair. In an interview on 05/18/2026 at 9:00AM, Resident #91 indicated his wheelchair tires were extremely damaged with the rubber peeling off of the wheels. Resident #91 further indicated due to the damaged wheels on his wheelchair, the wheels on the wheelchair did not properly lock.Observation on 05/19/2026 at 12:00PM revealed Resident #91's wheelchair had multiple areas of rubber missing off the wheelchair's wheels. In an interview on 05/19/2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A resident was positioned as ordered while receiving enteral feedings (a type of liquid nutritional supplement that is typically given through a tube directly inserted into the stomach) (Resident #2); 2. An enteral feeding administration set (tubing used to administer a resident's enteral feeding) for a resident's enteral feeding was changed every 24 hours per the facility policy and physician's order (Resident #2); and, 3. Only qualified staff placed a resident's enteral feeding on hold and/or restarted a resident's enteral feeding (Resident #R4). This deficient practice was identified for 2 (Resident #2, Resident #R4) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #R4) residents reviewed for enteral feeding maintenance. Findings: Review of the facility's Enteral Feedings-Safety Precautions, last revised on 10/01/2024 revealed, in part, Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and Registered Nurses (RNs) were the personnel responsible for preparing, storing, and administering enteral feedings. Further review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate records for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for accurate documentation. Findings: Review of the facility's Charting and Documentation policy, last revised on 10/01/2024, revealed, in part, all services provided to a resident shall be documented in the resident's medical record. Review of Resident #2's June 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an active order dated 01/22/2025 for staff to check the residual amount of Resident #2's enteral feeding (a type of liquid nutritional supplement that is typically given through a tube directly inserted into the stomach) every 4 hours at 12:00AM, 4:00AM, 8:00AM, 12:00PM, 4:00PM, and 8:00PM. Further review revealed an active order dated 05/22/2025 for staff to administer Jevity 1.5 (an enteral feeding) to Resident #2 at a rate of 40 milliliters/hour (ml/hr) continuously. Further review revealed an additional active order dated 05/26/2025 for staff to administer Jevity 1.5 at a rate of 20 ml/hr…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's privacy during incontinence care for 1 (Resident #R4) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #R4) residents observed for residents' rights. Findings: Observation on 06/24/2025 at 9:43AM revealed S3Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was providing incontinence care to Resident #R4 and did not announce that she was providing care to Resident #R4 when the surveyor knocked on the door to Resident #R4's room before entering. Further observation revealed Resident #R4's limbs and incontinence brief could be visualized from the doorway of Resident #R4's room. Further observation revealed that the privacy curtain in Resident #R4's room was not drawn to obstruct visualization of Resident #R4 from Resident #2 (Resident #R4's roommate) while S3CNA provided incontinence care to Resident #R4. In an interview on 06/24/2025 at 11:23AM, S2Dirctor of Nursing (DON) indicated S3CNA should have pulled Resident #R4's privacy curtain and/or provided privacy to Resident #R4 when she provided incontinence care to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure: 1. The facility's dining room was kept in a clean/sanitary manner; and, 2. The facility's hallways were kept in a clean/sanitary manner and in good repair for 3 (Hallway a, Hallway b, Hallway c) of 3 (Hallway a, Hallway b, Hallway c) hallways observed for physical environment. Findings: Review of the facility's Maintenance Service policy and procedure, with a revision date of 05/2024 revealed, in part, the functions of the facility's maintenance personnel included maintaining the building in good repair. Review of the facility's Environmental Services policy and procedure, with a revision date of 05/2024 revealed, in part, floors shall be maintained in clean, safe and sanitary manner. 1. Observation of the dining room on 05/27/2025 at 11:30AM revealed the following: - 16 windows had a total of 85 dead insects, between them, on the window sills; - five of the output air vents, on the ceiling above the area where the dining room tables were, had an unknown light gray substance surrounding them; and -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was transmitted within the required timeframe after completion for 1 (Resident #69) of 1 (Resident #69) sampled resident reviewed for assessment transmission. Findings: Review of Resident #69's annual MDS Assessment Section Z - Assessment Administration revealed, in part, Resident #69's annual MDS Assessment was completed and electronically signed by the Registered Nurse (RN) Assessment Coordinator on 04/17/2025. Review of the Final Validation Report dated 05/29/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #69's annual MDS Assessment was not submitted to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) database until 05/29/2025. In an interview on 05/29/2025 at 8:24AM, S11Registered Nurse (RN) indicated Resident #69's annual MDS Assessment was completed on 04/17/2025 but was not transmitted until 05/29/2025. S11RN further indicated that the assessment should have been transmitted within 7 days of the completion date but was not as required.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a system to accurately reconcile controlled substances for 6 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c, Medication Cart d, Medication Cart e, Medication Cart f) of 6 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c, Medication Cart d, Medication Cart e, Medication Cart f) medication carts reviewed for the reconciliation documentation of controlled substances. Findings: Review of the facility's May 2025 Medication Cart a Narcotic Nurse Sign on/off log revealed, in part, there was no signature that indicated the off going nurse had reconciled Medication Cart a's controlled substances with the oncoming nurse on: - 05/01/2025 for the 7:00PM to 7:00AM shift; and, - 05/22/2025 for the 7:00AM to 7:00PM shift. Further review revealed there was no signature that indicated the oncoming nurse had reconciled Medication Cart a's controlled substances with the off going nurse on 05/01/2025 for the 7:00PM to 7:00AM shift. Further review on 05/29/2025 at 1:57PM revealed S13Licensed Practical Nurse's (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a nurse secured medications when unatteneded for 1 (Medication Cart b) of 6 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c, Medication Cart d, Medication Cart e, Medication Cart f) medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings: Observation on 05/27/2025 at 12:22PM, revealed Medication Cart b was left unlocked and unattended. Further observation revealed the following medications were present on the top of Medication Cart b and unsecured: 55 tablets of metoprolol tartrate (a medication used to treat high blood pressure and chest pain) 25 milligrams (mg) and two vials of Zosyn (a medication used to treat infections) 4.5 grams. Further observation revealed S16Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (the nurse responsible for Medication Cart b) was sitting at the nursing desk with her back turned to Medication Cart b. Further observation revealed Medication Cart b was left unattended by S16 LPN for 10 minutes. In an interview on 05/27/2025 at 12:33PM, S16LPN acknowledged she should not have the above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. ensure food stored in the facility's walk in cooler was properly dated and labeled, 2. ensure the dishwasher temperature and sanitizer log was properly maintained. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's policy for Food Receiving and Storage, with a revision date of 05/2024 revealed, in part, refrigerated foods are covered, labeled, and dated. An initial kitchen observation on 05/27/2025 at 8:25AM revealed the following: - 1 container of cooked carrots in a container covered with saran wrap not dated, - 1 container of barbeque sauce covered with saran wrap not dated and, - 14 styrofoam containers of chicken noodle soup were not dated In an interview on 05/27/2025 at 8:28AM, S7Dietary Manager confirmed the above mentioned containers of food should have been labeled and dated but were not. 2. Review of the facility's policy titled Dishwashing Machine Use, with a revision date of 10/01/2024 revealed, in part, a supervisor will check the dishwashing machine for proper concentrations of sanitizer solution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the Quality Assurance and Assessment (QAA) committee met at least quarterly; and 2. Ensure the designated Infection Preventionist participated in the quarterly QAA meeting. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's QAA meeting sign-in sheet revealed the most recent QAA committee meeting was held on 04/09/2025. Further review revealed the prior QAA committee meeting was held on 10/09/2024. There was no documentation of a QAA meeting being conducted during the 1st quarter of 2025 (January-March) and the facility did not present any documented evidence a QAA meeting was held for the period of Jan-[DATE]. 2. Review of the Quarterly QAA meeting minutes dated 04/09/2025 revealed the Infection Preventionist (IP) was not documented on the sign-in sheet as being in attendance at the meeting. In an interview on 05/28/2025 at 3:01PM, S3Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the Infection Preventionist did not attend the 04/09/2025 QAA meeting. S3DON further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and records reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Store clean mop heads in the clean linen area of the facility's laundry room; 2. Store clean linen in a sanitary manner; and, 3. Ensure residents' suction canisters were changed on the scheduled change date for 2 (Resident #62, Resident #82) of 2 (Resident #62, Resident #82) sampled residents reviewed for infection control. Findings: 1. Observation on 05/27/2025 at 10:00AM revealed, the facility's clean mop heads were stored in an open container next to an open container of dirty mop heads, and adjacent to containers of dirty laundry in the facility's contaminated laundry area. In an interview on 05/27/2025 at 10:01AM, S9Housekeeper indicated the mop heads stored in the above mentioned open container in the facility's contaminated laundry area were clean and ready to be used. In an interview on 05/27/2025 at 10:03AM, S10Housekeeper indicated the clean mop heads were normally stored in the above mentioned open container next to the dirty mop heads in the facility's contaminated laundry area. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 2 (Resident #24, Resident #101) of 3 (Resident #24, Resident #64, Resident #101) sampled residents investigated for accommodation of needs. Findings: Review of the facility's Answering the Call Light policy dated 04/01/2021 with revised date of 10/01/2024 revealed, in part, it is the policy of the facility to ensure that the call light is accessible to the resident when in bed, from the toilet, from the shower or bathing facility and from the floor. Resident #24 Review of Resident #24's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/28/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #24 required substantial and/or maximal assistance for self-care from staff, partial/ moderate assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) from staff and was dependent on staff for transfers. Observation on 05/28/2025 at 11:55AM revealed Resident #24 was lying in bed. Further observation revealed Resident #24's call light was on the floor, at the head of the bed, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment reflected the resident's accurate discharge status for 1 (Resident #111 ) of 3 (Resident #109, Resident #110, Resident #111 ) sampled residents investigated for closed records. Findings: Review of Resident #111's Discharge MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/12/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #111 was discharged to a short term general hospital. Review of Resident #111 progress note dated 3/12/2025 revealed Resident #111 had a planned discharge to home. In an interview on 05/29/2025 at 11:26AM, S11Registered Nurse (RN), MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #111's discharge MDS with ARD of 03/12/2025 indicated Resident #11 was discharged to a short term general hospital and was incorrect. S11RN, MDS Coordinator indicated Resident #111 was discharged to home.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to administer a medication per a physician's orders for 1 (Resident #91) of 5 (Resident #2, Resident #29, Resident #91, Resident #101, Resident #162) residents reviewed for unnecessary medication review. Findings: Review of the scope of Practice of Practical Nursing defined in Section 961 of Chapter 11, Louisiana Revised Statues revealed the licensed practical nurse must practice under the direction of, in part, a licensed physician. Review of Resident #91's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #91 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included, cerebrovascular vasospasm and vasoconstriction; diabetes mellitus; essential (primary) hypertension; malignant melanoma of skin of breast; anxiety disorder, unspecified; morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories; and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #91's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/13/2025 revealed, in part,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record reviews, the provider failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked at least 8 hours for 1 (04/19/2025) of 22 (04/19/2025, 04/20/2025, 04/26/2025, 04/27/2025, 05/03/2025, 05/04/2025, 05/10/2025, 05/11/2025, 05/12/2025, 05/13/2025, 05/14/2025, 05/15/2025, 05/16/2025, 05/17/2025, 05/18/2025, 05/19/2025, 05/20/2025, 05/21/2025, 05/22/2025, 05/23/2025, 05/24/2025, 05/25/2025) days reviewed for staffing requirements. Findings: Review of the facility's weekend Nursing/Ancillary Personnel Staffing Pattern Reporting Form, dated 04/19/2025 through 05/252/2025, signed as complete and accurate by S1Administrator on 05/27/2025 revealed, in part, one RN worked on 04/19/2025. Review of the facility's time sheets dated 04/19/2025 revealed, in part, S2Direcor of Nursing (DON) was the only RN with a time clock entry for 04/19/2025. Further review revealed, S2DON clocked in at 9:01AM and clocked out on 11:13AM. In an interview on 05/29/2025 at 10:45AM, S2DON confirmed she was the only RN that worked on 04/19/2025. S2DON further indicated she was unable to provide any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment included specific nursing staffing needs for day, night, and weekend shifts. Findings: Review of the facility's facility assessment, last updated on 05/07/2025 revealed, in part, there was no documented evidence the facility assessment included specific staffing needs of its resident population for Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) for day, night, and weekend shifts. In an interview on 05/29/2025 at 11:00AM, S1Administrator was presented with the above mentioned findings and could offer no explanation as to why the facility assessment did not include specific LPN and CNA staffing needs for day, night, and weekend shifts.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-26 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff members received behavioral health training for 5 (S2Maintenance, S3Smoking Aide, S4Social Worker, S6Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA], and S7CNA) of 5 personnel records reviewed for required trainings. Findings Included: Review of the Facility's assessment dated [DATE] revealed, in part, the facility had 58 residents with Psychiatric Diagnoses and 14 residents required behavior management. Review of S2Maintenance's personnel record revealed, in part, no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence, S2Maintenance received behavioral health training. Review of S3Smoking Aide's personnel record revealed, in part, no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence, S3Smoking Aide received behavioral health training. Review of S4Social Worker's personnel record revealed, in part, no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, facility document reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported to the Louisiana Department of Health no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents investigated for abuse. Findings Included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Reporting, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property, last revised on 07/25/2023 revealed, in part, the Director of Nursing, the Assistant Administrator, and/or the Administrator shall immediately notify the designated representatives through the State Incident Management System (SIMS) within 2 hours if an allegation involved physical abuse or resulted in bodily harm or injury. Review of the provider's investigative report for physical abuse dated 11/21/2024 revealed, in part, S1Administrator received a report an altercation between S2Maintenance and Resident #1 had occurred outside in the smoking area. Further review revealed S2Maintenance stood up over Resident #1, who was sitting in a wheelchair, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate respiratory staff were available to provide respiratory care and services as ordered for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy and procedure titled, Ventilator Assessment / Monitoring, revealed, in part, complete physical and mechanical assessments should be made on the first ventilator round of both the resident and the ventilator. Further review revealed ventilator rounding was every 4 hours. Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed, in part, the facility's Technology Dependent Unit (TDU) staff needs required 2 respiratory therapists (RT) per shift. Further review revealed, minimum staffing requirements included 2 RTs twenty-four hours a day, every day. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 09/05/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Nurse Staffing Agency (NSA) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were trained on tracheostomy (a surgical opening in the neck to allow air to enter the lungs) and ventilator (a machine that moves air in and out of a person's lungs) safety prior to being assigned to the facility's Technology Dependent Unit (TDU) (unit at the facility that houses the tracheostomy and ventilator residents) for 2 (S6CNA and S7CNA) of 2 (S6CNA and S7CNA) NSA CNAs sampled for tracheostomy and ventilator competency. Findings: Review of the facility's nursing staff in-service records dated 02/22/2024 through 09/17/2024 revealed, in part, no documented evidence, and the facility could not provide any documented evidence, S6CNA and/or S7CNA were in-serviced on tracheostomy and ventilator safety. Review of the facility's staff assignment log dated 08/31/2024 revealed, in part, S6CNA and S7CNA were assigned to the [NAME] unit (TDU) during the 7:00 p.m - 7:00 a.m. shift. Review of S6CNA's NSA record revealed, in part, no documented evidence,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication was available for use and administered as ordered for 1 (Resident #6) of 1 (Resident #6) sampled residents reviewed for infection control. Findings: Review of Resident #6's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Gastrostomy status. Further review revealed, Resident #6 returned to the facility on [DATE] after an emergency room visit with a diagnosis of Contact Dermatitis. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/12/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #6's Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) was a 99 which indicated Resident #6 was rarely understood and unable to complete the interview. Review of the Resident #6's After Visit Summary dated 05/07/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #6 was discharged from the hospital with an order for Cephalexin (a medication used to treat infections) 250…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to: 1.) Ensure enhanced barrier precautions were implemented for a resident with an indwelling device or wound for 5 (Resident #6, Resident #51, Resident #111, Resident #474 and Resident #475) of 5 (Resident #6, Resident #51, Resident #111, Resident #474 and Resident #475) residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions; 2.) Ensure resident care items were identified and contained. 3.) Ensure nursing staff removed their gloves and completed hand hygiene while performing gastrostomy dressing changes for 1 (S10Registered Nurse (RN) of 1 (S10RN) RNs and 1 (S17Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)) of 1 (S17LPN) LPNs observed for gastrostomy tube dressing changes; and, 4.) Ensure the wound care nurse properly contained and disposed of a residents visibly soiled dressing for 1 (S9Wound Care Nurse/ Licensed Practical Nurse (WCLPN) of 1 (S9Wound Care Nurse/ Licensed Practical Nurse (WCLPN) nurses observed for wound care. Findings: Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to: 1.) Ensure a careplan with measureable interventions was developed for a resident receiving oral antibiotics and wound care for contact dermatitis for 1 (Resident #6) of 4 (Resident #6, Resident #51, Resident #474, and Resident #475) sampled residents reviewed for infection control; 2.) Ensure a careplan with measureable interventions was developed for a resident receiving hospice services for 1 (Resident #474) of 2 (Resident #12 and Resident #474) sampled residents reviewed for hospice services; and, 3.) Ensure a careplan with measureable interventions was developed for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 (Resident #474) of 2 (Resident #92 and Resident #474) sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheters. Findings: Resident #6 Review of Resident #6's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Gastrostomy status (a surgical inserted tube in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to have a resident with clean and trimmed fingernails for 1 (Resident #74) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living care (Resident #50 and Resident #74) in a total sample of 41 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #74's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed, in part, Resident #74 was assessed as having a brief interview for mental status score as a 5 which indicated Resident #74 was severely impaired. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #74 required substantial/maximal assistance for shower/bathing. Observation on 05/13/2024 at 10:15 a.m., revealed Resident #74's fingernails had an unknown black substance below his fingernails and some fingernails were approximately 3/16 inches long or longer. Observation on 05/14/2024 at 11:11 p.m., revealed Resident #74's fingernails had an unknown black substance below his fingernails and some fingernails were approximately 3/16 inches long or longer. In an interview on 05/13/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter (a tube that is passed through the lower abdominal wall directly into the bladder to drain urine) was secure to prevent pulling for 1 (Resident #475) of 4 (Resident #6, Resident #51, Resident #474, and Resident #475) sampled residents reviewed for infection control. Findings: Review of Resident #475's electronic medical record revealed, in part, Resident #475 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #475's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/29/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #475 was dependent on staff for toileting. Review of Resident #475's May 2024 Physicians Orders revealed, in part an order dated 02/26/2024 for staff to assure a securement device such as a Stat Lock (a device used to secure an indwelling urinary catheter to a residents lower extremity) with Resident #475's indwelling urinary catheter was in place to her lower extremity every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a residents gastrostomy tube (a tube inserted directly into the abdomen to provide nutrition) site was cleaned as ordered by the physician for 2 (Resident #1 and R5) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and R5) residents reviewed for gastrostomy site care. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/28/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a gastrostomy tube. Review of Resident #1's April 2024 physician's orders, in part, revealed an order with a start date of 03/10/2024 for cleanse gastrostomy site with wound cleanser, pat dry and cover with drain sponge every day and as needed. Review of Resident #1's Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) revealed, in part, Resident #1' did not receive gastrostomy site care on 03/11/2024, 03/13/2024, 03/15/2024, 03/17/2024, 03/19/2024, 03/21/2024, 03/23/2024, 03/25/2024, 03/27/2024, 03/29/2024, 03/31/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was free from pests as evidence by: 1. Maggots were identified in a residents gastrostomy tube (a tube that is inserted into a person's stomach to provide nutrition) site; 2. A fly was observed on the gastrostomy tube of 1 (Resident #3) of 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) residents observed for gastrostomy tube site care; 3. A fly was observed in the facility's kitchen; 4. Flies were observed in the facility's dining room; and, 5. Flies were observed on a residents bed linens for 1 (R4) of 3 (Resident #2, Resident #3, and R4) resident rooms observed for pests. Findings: Review of the facility's Root Cause Analysis Template dated 04/24/2024 revealed, in part, the description of event was a resident's gastrostomy tube site was found to have maggots. Further review revealed there were flies in the building. 1. Review of Resident #1's nurse note dated 04/19/2024 at 9:36 p.m. revealed, in part, S3Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete and accurate for residents' activities of daily living (ADLs) and residents' 2 hour rounding for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses of cerebrovascular vasospasm and vasoconstriction (a narrowing of the arteries in the brain), unspecified convulsions (a medical condition where the body muscles contract and relax rapidly and repeatedly), and altered mental status. Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed Resident #1 was care planned to have an ADL deficit related to a cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and required intervention from staff to provide assistance with ADLs. Review of Resident #1's nurse's note dated 12/20/2023 at 7:42 a.m. revealed Resident #1 was transferred out of the facility to the hospital. Review of Resident #1's November 2023 ADL…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-12 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit payroll information for direct care staffing as required. Findings: Review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report [NAME] Report 1705D Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 4 2023 (July 1 - September 30) revealed, in part, the facility failed to submit staffing data for Quarter 4. In an interview on 01/09/2024 at 3:30 p.m., S20Human Resources stated she was unable to produce documented evidence the facility had submitted the PBJ Staffing Data for FY Quarter 4 2023 (July 1 - September 30). In an interview on 01/12/2024 at 2:50 p.m., S1Administrator stated the facility's PBJ Staffing Data was not submitted for FY Quarter 4 2023.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 12 controlled drugs were accurately reconciled for 1 (Medication Cart y) of 2 (Medication Cart x and Medication Cart y,) medication carts observed for controlled drug reconciliation. Findings: Review of the facility's Controlled Substances Policy and Procedure revealed, in part, when a controlled substance was administered, the nurse administering the medication was responsible for recording: the name of the resident receiving the medication; the name, strength and dose of the medication; the time of the medication was administered; the method in which the medication was administered, the quantity of medication remaining; and the signature of the nurse administering the medication. Observation on 01/10/2024 at 5:58 a.m. of Medication Cart y revealed the following: - Resident #3's controlled medication cards had 2 tablets of Lacosamide (a controlled medication used to prevent and control seizures) 200 milligram (mg) and 49 tablets of Phenobarbital (a medication used to prevent and treat seizures)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not 5% or greater by having a medication error rate of 14.8%. This deficient practice was identified for 1 [S6Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)] of 3 nurses (S6LPN, S7LPN, and S8Registered Nurse) who were observed during medication administration. Findings: Observation on 01/10/2024 at 10:05 a.m. revealed S6LPN administered Cetirizine (medication used to treat allergies) 10 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet per gastric tube, Sennosides (medication used to treat constipation) 8.6 mg 2 tablets per gastric tube, Iron 325 mg 1 tablet per gastric tube, and Refresh Lacri-Lube (medication used for dry, irritated eyes) 56.8-42.5% ointment 1 application to both eyes to Resident #3. Review of Resident #3's current physician orders revealed, in part, an order with a start date of 12/17/2023 for Loratadine (medication used to treat allergies) 10 mg via gastric tube daily. Further review revealed, an order with a start date of 01/05/2024 for Senna- S (medication used to treat constipation) 8.6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0826 — pattern
    Provide specialized rehabilitative services by qualified personnel, when ordered for a resident by a doctor.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to ensure Respiratory Therapist staff had completed annual respiratory therapy competencies completed for 10 (S9Respiratory Therapist, S10Respiratory Therapist, S11Respiratory Therapist, S12Respiratory Therapist, S13Respiratory Therapist, S14Respiratory Therapist, S15Respiratory Therapist, S16Respiratory Therapist, S17Respiratory Therapist, S18Respiratory Therapist) of 11 (S4Respiratory Therapist, S9Respiratory Therapist, S10Respiratory Therapist, S11Respiratory Therapist, S12Respiratory Therapist, S13Respiratory Therapist, S14Respiratory Therapist, S15Respiratory Therapist, S16Respiratory Therapist, S17Respiratory Therapist, S18Respiratory Therapist) Respiratory Therapist files reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's training and competency records revealed, S9Respiratory Therapist had annual respiratory therapy competencies completed on 12/11/2022. There was no documented evidence and the facility did not present any documented evidence that respiratory therapy competencies was completed for the year 2023. Review of the facility's training and competency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative/power of attorney(POA) was immediately notified of a significant change in his medical condition for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Notification of Changes policy, revealed, in part, a notification of change included a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychological status, such as deterioration in health, mental, or psychological status, in life-threatening conditions or clinical conditions. Review of Resident #1's Power of Attorney's (POA) video camera footage of Resident #1's room on [DATE] from approximately 11:48 p.m. through [DATE] at approximately 12:03 a.m. revealed, in part, Resident #1 lying supine with his tracheostomy (a device surgically inserted into the trachea to allow air to fill the lungs) lying on Resident #1's right side on top of his blanket. S4RT entered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident remained free from neglect by failing to ensure staff made rounds/checked on a resident every two hours for a resident who was cognitively impaired, had an active tracheostomy status diagnosis, and who was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Reporting Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property Policy, revised March 2023, revealed, in part, all residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property as well as the fear of being abused or neglected. Further review revealed, in part, the Director of Nursing, Assistant Administrator, or Administrator should immediately notify the State Survey Agency within 2 hours after the allegation. Review of the facility's Reinsertion of Tracheostomy Tube policy revealed, in part, the respiratory care staff would be held responsible and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect timely to the State Survey Agency and Certification Agency as required for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Reporting Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property Policy, revised March 2023, revealed, in part, all residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property as well as the fear of being abused or neglected. Further review revealed, in part, the Director of Nursing, Assistant Administrator, or Administrator should immediately notify the State Survey Agency within 2 hours after the allegation. Review of Resident #1's Power of Attorney's (POA) video camera footage of Resident #1's room revealed on 12/15/2023 at 7:43 p.m., S4RT exited Resident #1's room and did not return until 11:48 p.m., at which time S4RT discovered Resident #1 with his tracheostomy tube removed and to be pulseless and breathless. In an interview on 01/12/2024 at 4:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure tube feedings were administered as ordered for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5 ) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #3's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 12/07/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #3's was severely impaired and dependent on staff with eating. Review of Resident #3's January 2024 physician orders revealed, in part, an order with a start date of 11/30/2023 for Jevity 1.2 calorie (cal) (a tube feeding formula that provides complete and balanced nutrition) at 70 milliliters (ml)/hour (hr). Observation on 01/10/2024 at 10:06 a.m. revealed Resident #3 was receiving Jevity 1.5 cal tube feeding at 70 ml/hr via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) In an interview on 01/10/2024 at 10:23 a.m., S6Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated Resident #3 was receiving Jevity 1.5 cal tube feeding at 70ml/hr. Observation on 01/10/2024 at 1:10 p.m. revealed Resident #3 was receiving Jevity 1.5 cal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to: 1) Ensure an order was obtained and/or clarified if a compression device to a resident's legs was to be applied or not with a resident's physician (Resident #3); 2) Ensure nursing staff monitored and/or assessed a resident's compression device (Resident #3); and, 3) Ensure a physician's order for a medication was implemented in a timely manner (Resident #3). This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings: Review of Resident #3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/07/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #2 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated Resident #3's cognition was intact. Further review revealed, in part, Resident #3 had a diagnosis of lymphedema (swelling caused by circulatory blockage), end stage renal disease (ESRD), and dependent on renal dialysis. 1. Review of Resident #3's care plan revealed, in part,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician orders for medication administration was coordinated with a resident's dialysis schedule and the resident's physician (Resident #2). This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for dialysis. Findings: Review of Resident #2's October 2023 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, Resident #2 was to receive dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday due to end stage renal disease. Review of Resident #2's August 2023 through October 03, 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed, in part, the following medications were not administered at 9:00 a.m. because Resident #2 was unavailable and/or at dialysis on the following dates: 1) Allopurinol (a medication used to treat pain and inflammatory disease) 100 milligram (mg) 1 tablet once a day on: 08/03/2023, 08/07/2023, 08/19/2023, 08/26/2023, 09/02/2023, 09/09/2023, 09/16/2023, 09/23/2023, and 10/03/2023; 2) Aspirin (a medication used to prevent heart attacks and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to: 1) Ensure a resident received a therapeutic diet as ordered for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) sampled residents reviewed for weight loss; 2) Ensure a resident's meal intake was documented for each meal for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) sampled residents reviewed for weight loss; 3) Ensure a resident's dietary recommendation was implemented for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) sampled residents reviewed for weight loss; and, 4) Ensure a resident's weight was monitored weekly per physician orders for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) sampled residents reviewed for weight loss. Findings: Resident #1 Review of the facility's Weight and Height Measurement policy revealed, in part, staff are to obtain an accurate weight of each resident to assess nutritional and hydration status and to identify a significant change in condition. Further review revealed residents are to be weighed on admission and monthly unless otherwise ordered by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$282,413 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $50,948 — penalty dated 2024-11-26
  • $231,465 — penalty dated 2024-01-12
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-09 for 60 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NUNEZ, LEXISIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST45%since 01/12/2016
SCHWAB, LACEYIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/12/2016
BOHNE, KIMBERLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/12/2016
MYERS, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/12/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$769K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 95%Medicare 2%Other / private 4%

About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $769K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$280per resident / day
operating cost
$8,526per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$237per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195214. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next