St Jude's Health & Wellness Center
450A S CLaiborne Ave, Fl 6, New Orleans, LA 70112 · Non profit - Other · 116 certified beds · (504) 895-3953 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $389,089 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-23)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.2% | 17.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 5.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.1% | 1.2% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.7% | 2.3% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.5% | 17.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.0% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.3% | 94.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.9% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.5% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 14.3% | 3.1% | 1.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 31.8% | 76.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 34.4% | 28.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.9% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.17 | 2.56 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.55 | 2.74 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 70.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.6%CMS range 21.7–49.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 6.7–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 70.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 4.3–14.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.21 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 77.0 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse by a staff member for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents investigated for abuse.The deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for Resident #1 on 02/17/2026 at approximately 4:00PM, when S4Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) physically and verbally abused Resident #1 by hitting him repeatedly on his face, head, and shoulders with a closed fist, by putting her knee on Resident #1's neck, by grasping Resident #1's shirt and attempting to drag Resident #1 across the floor, and by yelling at Resident #1, b*h, don't hit me and b*h, I'm tired of you. The immediate jeopardy situation continued on 02/17/2026 when S4LPN stated to S5Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and S6CNA, in front of Resident #1, leave that b*h on the floor, don't help him up. The above mentioned physical and verbal abuse was witnessed by S5CNA, S6CNA, and Resident #2. The immediate jeopardy situation remained present on 02/17/2025 when S5CNA and S6CNA left Floor b…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure witnessed physical and verbal abuse was reported to the facility's administrator/designee and the state agency within 2 hours for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents investigated for abuse.The deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for Resident #1 on 02/17/2026 at approximately 4:00PM, when S4Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) physically and verbally abused Resident #1 by hitting him repeatedly on his face, head, and shoulders with a closed fist, by putting her knee on Resident #1's neck, by grasping Resident #1's shirt and attempting to drag Resident #1 across the floor, and by yelling at Resident #1, b*h, don't hit me and b*h, I'm tired of you. The immediate jeopardy situation continued on 02/17/2026 when S4LPN stated to S5Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and S6CNA, in front of Resident #1, leave that b*h on the floor, don't help him up. The above mentioned physical and verbal abuse was witnessed by S5CNA, S6CNA, and Resident #2. The immediate jeopardy situation remained present on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-03-13 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services in a timely manner per physician's orders for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for pharmaceutical services. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 02/04/2025 when Resident #1's valproic acid level (a blood test to measure the amount of valproic acid in the blood) was not drawn after being ordered by Resident #1's nurse practitioner on 01/29/2025. On 02/17/2025, Resident #1 was observed by the facility to be lethargic and was transferred to the hospital. Resident #1 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 02/19/2025 with a diagnosis of valproic acid toxicity (an excessive accumulation of valproic acid in the body which can lead to coma or death). S1Chief Operating Officer (COO) and S2Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 03/12/2025 at 6:50PM. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 03/13/2025 at 4:30PM, after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility's administrative staff failed to use its resources efficiently and effectively to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents by failing to oversee the effective implementation of physician laboratory orders for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for pharmaceutical services. This lack of administrative oversite resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 02/04/2025 when Resident #1's valproic acid level (a blood test to measure the amount of valproic acid in the blood) was not drawn after being ordered by Resident #1's nurse practitioner on 01/29/2025. On 02/17/2025, Resident #1 was observed by the facility to be lethargic and was transferred to the hospital. Resident #1 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 02/19/2025 with a diagnosis of valproic acid toxicity (an excessive accumulation of valproic acid in the body which can lead to coma or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-04-08 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespreadEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff working as nurse aides met minimum state-approved competency and training requirements for 8 (S4Direct Service Worker [DSW], S5DSW, S6DSW, S7DSW, S8DSW, S11DSW, S12DSW, and S15Front Desk Receptionist [FDR]) of 13 (S3DSW, S4DSW, S5DSW, S6DSW, S7DSW, S8DSW, S9DSW, S10DSW, S11DSW, S12DSW, S13Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA], S14CNA, and S15FDR) personnel files reviewed. On [DATE], at approximately 7:17 a.m., an Immediate Jeopardy occurred when the facility allowed S4DSW, S11DSW, and S12DSW to work independently with residents as nurse aides without having met the minimum state-approved competency and training requirements. Review of the facility's CNA Break and Lunch Schedule Sheets revealed, in part on [DATE] through [DATE], S4DSW, S5DSW, S6DSW, S7DSW, S8DSW, S11DSW, S12DSW, and S15FDR were assigned to work independently as nurse aides to provide direct care to residents without having met the minimum state-approved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently by failing to ensure staff working as nurse aides met minimum state-approved competency and training requirements for 8 (S4DSW, S5DSW, S6DSW, S7DSW, S8DSW, S11DSW, S12DSW, and S15FDR) of 13 (S3DSW, S4DSW, S5DSW, S6DSW, S7DSW, S8DSW, S9DSW, S10DSW, S11DSW, S12DSW, S13CNA, S14CNA, and S15FDR) personnel files reviewed. This lack of administrative oversight resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 02/09/2024, at approximately 7:17 a.m., when the facility's administration allowed S4DSW, S11DSW, and S12DSW to work independently as nurse aides without having met the minimum state-approved competency and training requirements. Review of the facility's CNA Break and Lunch Schedule Sheets revealed, in part for the time period of 02/09/2024 through 03/30/2024 revealed, in part, S4DSW, S5DSW, S6DSW, S7DSW, S8DSW, S11DSW, S12DSW, and S15Front Desk Receptionist were assigned to work independently as nurse aides to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to deliver care per professional standards by failing to ensure a resident's medication order was clarified by the physician for 1 (Resident #R7) of 3 sampled residents investigated for pharmacy services. Findings:Review of the February 2026 Louisiana Administrative Code, Title 46, Part XLVII S3915. Standard Number 7: Professional Performance revealed, in part, the Registered Nurse (RN) demonstrates the following professional nursing practice behaviors. The RN clarifies any order or treatment regimen believed to be inaccurate, or contraindicated by consulting with the appropriate licensed practitioner and by notifying the ordering practitioner when the registered nurse makes the decisions not to administer the medication or treatment. Review of the facility's RN job description revealed, in part, the RN was responsible for providing and supervising quality nursing care to residents in accordance with facility policies, state and federal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's responsible party (RP) was invited to, attended, and/or participated in a care plan meeting for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care planning requirements. Findings:Review of the facility's Care Plan policy and procedure, with a revision date of 04/22/2009, revealed, in part, the resident's RP should be invited to attend the plan of care conference at least one week in advance of the tentatively scheduled date. Further review revealed the interdisciplinary team would meet with the resident and the resident's RP to develop quantifiable objectives for the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis, in part, of vascular dementia. Review of Resident #2's admission packet, dated 04/16/2026, revealed, in part, Resident #2 was incapable of making medical decisions.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0575 — isolatedPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent state agencies and/or advocacy groups, and/or a statement as to how a resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal nursing facility regulation, including but not limited to resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property in the facility, and non-compliance with the advanced directives requirements and requests for information regarding returning to the community. Findings:Observation of all the facility's resident common areas on 06/22/2026 at 10:30AM, revealed no postings of the names, addresses and telephone numbers of all pertinent state agencies and advocacy groups, and/or no postings regarding the process as to how and/or when a resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency. Observation of all the facility's resident common areas on 06/24/2026 at 1:15PM, revealed no postings of the names, addresses and telephone numbers of all pertinent state…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed ensure a notice that the availability of all reports related to all annual and complaint surveys from the past 3 years and any plans of corrections (POC) in effect were available for review upon request was posted in a prominent and accessible area. Findings:Observation on 06/22/2026 at 10:30AM of the facility's common areas revealed no notices posted that any reports related to all annual and complaint surveys from the past 3 years and any POC in effect were available for review upon request. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/20/2026 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 06/23/2026 at 9:15AM, Resident #1 indicated the facility did not have the above mentioned notice posted in a prominent location for all residents and families to view. In an interview on 06/23/2026 at 11:20AM, Resident #2's responsible party (RP) indicated the facility did not have the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure insulin (a medication that lowers blood glucose) multi-dose flex pens were dated when opened and/or removed from refrigerated storage or discarded as required for 1 (Medication Cart a) of 3 sampled medication carts observed for medication storage requirements. Findings:Review of the facility's Insulin policy and procedure, with a revision date of [DATE], revealed, in part, insulin must be refrigerated until needed, and open insulin must be dated the day it is opened. Further review revealed the life span for insulin is only 28 days from the time it is opened. Further review revealed after 28 days, the unused portion must be discarded. Review of the facility's undated Liberalized Medication policy and procedure revealed, in part, when opening a multi dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. Observation on [DATE] at 7:55AM of Medication Cart a revealed the following:-Resident #3's opened insulin Novolog (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication administration and order completion were accurately documented for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 sampled residents investigated for accurate medical record documentation. Findings:Review of the facility's undated Liberalized Medication policy and procedure revealed, in part, the individual administering the medication should document the administration in the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) after giving each medication. Review of the facility's undated Director of Nursing (DON) job description revealed, in part, responsibilities included monitoring clinical documentation for accuracy, completeness, and regulatory compliance. On 06/24/2026 at 11:00AM, S2DON was presented with a request for all 06/19/2026 medication administration records and progress notes for Resident #2. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to smoke for 1 (Resident #6) of 1 sampled resident investigated for smoking. Findings:Review of the facility's Resident Smoking and Tobacco Use Policy, with an effective date of 08/01/2025, revealed, in part, residents had the right to smoke. Further review revealed residents who were cognitively impaired or had mobility limitations may only smoke under staff supervision. Further review revealed the facility's staff were responsible for monitoring compliance with this policy. Review of Resident #6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set with and Assessment Reference Date of 12/26/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated Resident #6 was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's undated list of smokers revealed, in part, Resident #6 was listed as an unsafe smoker. In an interview on 01/22/2026 at 10:31AM, Resident #6 indicated he was no allowed to go outside to smoke at night because he was not on the list to go out to smoke after 7:00PM. In a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents, with a newly evident serious mental disorder, were referred to the appropriate state agency for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II evaluation for 2 (Resident #21, Resident #49) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings: On 01/22/2026 at 2:30PM, S15Social Services Director was presented with a request for Resident #21's and Resident #49's Level II PASARR evaluation. On 01/23/2026 at 8:30AM, S15Social Services Director was presented with a request for Resident #21's and Resident #49's Level II PASARR evaluation. Resident #21 Review of Resident #21's face sheet revealed, in part, Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #21 was diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) on 01/13/2026. Review of Resident #21's record revealed no evidence a PASARR Level II evaluation was completed for Resident #21. In an interview on 01/23/2026 at 10:07AM, S15Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review a resident's care plan quarterly for 1 (Resident #6) of 18 sampled resident's care plans reviewed. Findings:Review of the facility's Care Plan policy, last revised on 04/22/2009, revealed, in part, the facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT) will reassess the resident no less than once every 3 months, and as needed, and revise the resident's plan of care together with the resident and/or the residents responsibly party. Review of Resident #6's electronic medical record revealed, in part, Resident #6's last quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed on 12/26/2025. Review of Resident #6's progress notes revealed no care plan meeting was held with Resident #6, Resident #6's representative, and/or any of the facility's IDT to review Resident #6's care plan since 07/16/2025. In an interview on 01/23/2026 at 10:02AM, S15Social Services Director (SSD) indicated Resident #6's last care plan meeting was on 07/16/2025. S15SSD further indicated a care plan meeting should have occurred since that date, because care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure only authorized personnel had access to medications for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 sampled residents observed with medications at the bedside. Findings:Review of the facility's undated Storage of Medications policy revealed, in part, medications were to be stored in locked compartments and in the packaging in which they were received. Further review revealed, only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications should have access to medications. Review of Resident #47's Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/29/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9, which indicated Resident #47 was moderately cognitively impaired. Observation of Resident #47's room on 01/21/2026 at 12:40PM revealed a white pill was on the ground split in two along with a medication cup that had Resident #47's name written on it. Further observation revealed a second medication cup, labeled with Resident #47's name and present on Resident #47's beside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was served a diet that met the resident's special dietary needs for 1 (Resident #9) of 1 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings:Review of the facility's undated Nutrition policy and procedure revealed, in part, all physician ordered diets shall be implemented promptly upon receipt, and the dietary department shall prepare and serve meals which meet the ordered diet and nutritional requirements. Review of Resident #9's record revealed diagnosis of, in part, stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease (condition in which the resident's kidneys were damaged and were unable to filter out toxins). Review of Resident #9's January 2026 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, Resident #9 was to be provided a renal diet. Review of Resident #9's Meal Ticket dated 01/21/2026 revealed Resident #9 was to receive a renal diet with no potatoes. Observation on 01/21/2026 at 1:05PM revealed Resident #9 was served cubed potatoes. In an interview on 01/21/2026 at 1:06PM, S16Licensed Practical Nurse indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff completed hand hygiene while performing incontinence care for 1 (Resident #63) of 1 sampled residents observed for incontinence care. Findings:Review of the facility's undated Standard Precautions policy and procedure revealed, in part, hand hygiene must be performed immediately after contact with any resident item that may be contaminated. Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s October 2022 Guidelines for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings revealed, in part, staff should decontaminate their hands if moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during patient care. Observation on 01/21/2026 at 11:39AM revealed S17Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and S18CNA entered Resident #63's room to perform incontinence care. S17CNA and S18CNA removed Resident #63's soiled diaper and wiped Resident #63's buttocks and perineal area. S17CNA and S18CNA then placed a clean diaper on Resident #63, rolled Resident #63, placed a clean draw sheet under Resident #63,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the pneumococcal (an infection caused by streptococcus pneumonia bacteria) and influenza (a respiratory infection caused by a virus) vaccines were administered for 1 (Resident #60) of 5 sampled residents investigated for immunizations. Findings:Review of the facility's undated Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccine policy and procedure revealed, in part, residents should be vaccinated against the pneumococcal disease and influenza virus unless the vaccination was medically contraindicated or the resident and/or legal representative refused the vaccination. Review of Resident #60's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/07/2026 revealed, in part, Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10, which indicated Resident #60's cognition was moderately impaired. Review of Resident #60's Pneumonia Vaccine Consent Form revealed, in part, Resident #60's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse for 1 (Resident #4) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) sampled residents investigated for resident abuse. Findings:Review of the facility's undated Abuse Recognition, Reporting, and Investigation policy revealed, in part, the facility was to protect residents from any physical and mental mistreatment and to not permit residents to be subjected to abuse by anyone, including other residents. Further review revealed physical abuse was defined as hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Review of the facility's Statewide Incident Management System Report investigation entered on 09/17/2025 that occurred on 09/10/2025 at 9:35AM revealed, in part, Resident #2 walked into the day room and hit Resident #4 in the face. Further review revealed the altercation was witnessed by 2 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) (S2CNA and S3CNA), and resident to resident abuse was substantiated.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment reflected the resident's accurate cognitive status for 1 (Resident #1) of 9 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9) sampled residents investigated for accuracy of assessments. Findings:Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/20/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #1 was comatose. Review of Resident #1's nurse progress note dated 8/20/2025 at 11:23AM revealed, in part, Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person, place and time and was able to make her needs known. Review of Resident #1's nurse progress note dated 8/20/2025 at 9:59PM revealed, in part, Resident #1 was able to express her needs and could self-feed. Further review revealed, Resident #1 was mobile via wheelchair and was able to swallow medications whole. Review of Resident #1's nurse progress note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1.) maintenance services placed an outlet cover over a wall socket in a resident's room (Resident #1); and, 2.) housekeeping services cleaned an unknown brown substance off of a resident's floor (Resident #1). This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for environment. Findings: Observation of Resident #1's room on 03/10/2025 at 6:42AM revealed the outlet cover over a wall socket near the foot of Resident #1's bed did not have a wall covering. Observation further revealed an unknown brown substance about an inch long was seen on the side of Resident #1's bed on the floor. Observation on 03/12/2025 at 9:40AM of Resident #1's room revealed the outlet cover over a wall socket near the foot of Resident #1's bed did not have a wall covering. Observation further revealed an unknown brown substance about an inch long was seen on the side of Resident #1's bed on the floor. In an interview on 03/12/2025 at 11:50AM, S1Chief Operation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide incontinence care for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings: Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set with an assessment reference date of 01/24/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan revealed, in part, Resident #1 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Further review revealed an intervention included to check Resident #1 every 2 hours as required for incontinence. Observation on 03/10/2025 at 6:32AM revealed S4Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and S5CNA pulled back the sheets to provide incontinence care to Resident #1. Resident #1 had a bowel movement leaking from the adult brief onto her abdomen, incontinent pad, and bed sheets. The bowel movement was wet in the center and dry around the edges. In an interview on 03/10/2025 at 6:40, S4CNA indicated the last time she checked on Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized the correct personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care to a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 (Resident #10) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #10) residents observed during incontinence care. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy and Procedure revealed, in part, gowns and gloves should be worn when emptying a urinary catheter. Observation on 03/10/2025 at 5:18AM revealed an EBP sign on the outside of Resident #10's door. Observation further revealed S5Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered Resident #10's room without a gown and proceeded to empty Resident #10's urinary catheter into a graduated cylinder. In an interview on 03/10/2025 at 5:23AM, S5CNA indicated she did not use a gown when emptying urinary catheters and further indicated she did not know that she needed to. In an interview on 03/10/2025 at 10:25AM, S2Director of Nursing (DON) indicated gowns should be worn when emptying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — patternHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to allow residents unrestricted visitation. Findings: Review of the facility's undated visitation policy and procedure, revealed, in part, residents and families are encouraged to have visitors between the hours of 8:00AM and 8:00PM. Further review revealed exceptions to these hours must be cleared by the Administrator and/or Director of Nursing. There was no documented evidence, and the facility was unable to present any documented evidence, the limitations placed on the residents' right to visitation was based on a clinical or safety concern. In an interview on 01/28/2025 at 10:10AM, Resident #37 indicated residents were not allowed to have visitors after 8:00PM. In an interview on 01/29/2025 at 11:00AM, S7Receptionist indicated the facility's visiting hours were from 8:00AM to 8:00PM. S7Receptionist further indicated residents are not allowed visitors before 8:00AM or after 8:00PM. In an interview on 01/29/2025 at 3:40PM, S8Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)/Receptionist confirmed visitors were not allowed to enter the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A resident's dialysis access site was assessed and vital signs were obtained upon the resident's return from dialysis (Resident #32); and, 2. The facility communicated with a resident's dialysis center regarding the residents condition (Resident #32) This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #32) of 1 (Resident #32) sampled residents reviewed for dialysis. Findings: Review of Resident #32's January 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 12/11/2024 for Resident #32 to attend dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday, and to obtain post dialysis vital signs of blood pressure, pulse, respirations, and temperature. Review of Resident #32's dialysis communication sheets revealed, in part: -No documented evidence the facility communicated with the dialysis center on 12/03/2024; -No documented evidence Resident #32's dialysis access site was assessed or Resident #32's vital signs were obtained after he returned from dialysis on 12/05/2024; -No documented evidence the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and observation, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Opened insulin pens were labeled with the date the pen was opened; and, 2. Expired insulin pens were not available for resident use. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Medication Cart a) of 2 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b) medication carts reviewed for the storage of medications. Findings: Observation of Medication Cart a on [DATE] at 12:44PM revealed: -Resident #10's open Humulin R insulin pen (a medication used to lower blood sugar) had an opened date of [DATE]; -Resident #36's open Humulin R insulin pen had an opened date of [DATE]; -Resident #36's open Lantus insulin pen (a long acting medication used to lower blood sugar) had an opened date of [DATE]; -Resident #40's open Novolog insulin pen (a medication used to lower blood sugar) had an opened date of [DATE]; and, -Resident #40's open Humulin 70/30 vial (a medication used to lower blood sugar) was not dated with an opened date. In an interview on [DATE] at 12:46PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a resident's right to make choices regarding smoking for 1 (Resident #32) of 3 (Resident #26, Resident #32, Resident #45) sampled residents reviewed for smoking. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Resident Rights policy and procedure revealed, in part, residents should be encouraged to exercise their rights as a resident and citizen, and be treated courteously, fairly, and with the fullest measure of dignity. Further review revealed residents had the right to use tobacco in accordance with applicable policies, rules, and laws. Review of the facility's undated Smoking policy and procedure, revealed, in part, residents were allowed to smoke only in the designated smoking areas located outside the building. Further review revealed no documented evidence of a set time for smoking hours. There was no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence the facility and residents had any agreed upon facility rules restricting a resident's right to smoke. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status documented in the resident's medical record was consistent with the resident's wishes for 1 (Resident #81) of 25 (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #8, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #15, Resident #24, Resident #26, Resident #31, Resident #32, Resident #33, Resident #38, Resident #45, Resident #51, Resident #55, Resident #56, Resident #59, Resident #61, Resident #70, Resident #73, Resident #75, Resident #76, Resident #78, Resident #81) sampled residents included in the initial pool. Findings: Review of Resident #81's chart/medical record revealed a notification signed and dated on [DATE] which indicated Resident #81's wished to be a Full Code (which indicated in the event she no pulse or no breath, medical interventions would take place). Review of Resident #81's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #81's code status was Do Not Resuscitate ([DNR] code status that instructed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN), Form Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-10055 and/or the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) Form (CMS-10123) notices were given, explained, and/or signed by residents prior to the discontinuation of Medicare Part A services (short term skilled nursing care and/or rehabilitation) for 3 (Resident #62, Resident #68, Resident #234) of 3 (Resident #62, Resident #68, Resident #234) sampled residents reviewed for termination of Medicare Part A services. Findings: Resident #62 Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #62's Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, Form CMS-20052, completed by the facility, revealed, in part, Resident #62's last day of Medicare Part A Services was on 07/29/2024. Review of Resident #62's NOMNC Form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to conduct an accurate comprehensive assessment for 2 (Resident #61, Resident #75) of 2 (Resident #61, Resident #75) sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive dental status assessment. Findings: Resident #61 Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #61's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/27/2024 revealed, in part, A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed Resident #61 was assessed to have no oral and dental issues identified. Observation on 01/27/2025 at 11:12AM revealed Resident #61 had several upper and lower teeth missing. In an interview on 01/27/2025 at 11:15AM, Resident #61 indicated he was missing teeth when he was admitted to the facility. In an interview on 01/30/2025 at 1:30PM, S1Administrator could offer no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide documentation of a resident's Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 1 (Resident #8) of 3 (Resident #8, Resident #59, Resident #70) sampled residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #8 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder and Unspecified Dementia on 02/15/2022. Review of Resident #8's Form 142 revealed Resident #8 was approved by the Office of Behavioral Health Level II Appointing Authority for admission for the time period of 11/08/2024 through 11/07/2025. There was no documented evidence and the facility was unable to present any documented evidence, that the facility had received, reviewed and/or maintained Resident #8's Level II PASARR which was completed by the Office of Behavioral Health. In an interview on 01/30/2025 at 1:45PM, S3SocialServices acknowledged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure safe smoking interventions were carried out for a resident identified by the facility as being an unsafe smoker for 1 (Resident #45) of 3 (Resident #26, Resident #32, Resident #45) sampled residents reviewed for safe smoking. Findings: Review of the facility's Unsafe Smoker List revealed, in part, Resident #45 was listed as being an unsafe smoker. Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, in part, of vascular dementia, tremors, and epilepsy. Review of Resident #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/18/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #45 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 which revealed Resident #45 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #45's Care Plan with a start date of 12/04/2025 and a review date of 04/01/2025 revealed, in part, a care plan for unsafe smoking with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's psychotropic medication was not ordered on an as needed basis for greater than 14 days for 1 (Resident #55) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #15, Resident #33, Resident #55, Resident #70) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of Resident #55's January 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 09/28/2024 for Resident #55 to be administered 1 tablet of Lorazepam (a psychotropic medication used to treat anxiety) 0.5 milligrams (mg) every eight hours as needed. There was no documented evidence, and the provider did not present any documented evidence, Resident #55's physician gave a clinical rational for continuation, or provided a duration of Resident #55's order dated 09/28/2024 to administer Resident #55 1 tablet of Lorazepam 0.5 mg every eight hours as needed. In an interview on 01/30/2025 at 1:00PM, S2Director of Nursing indicated the facility should have clarified a duration and clarified the physician's rational for the continuation of Resident #55's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician was notified laboratory tests were not completed as ordered for 1 (Resident #55) of 1 (Resident #55) sampled resident reviewed for laboratory services. Findings: Review of Resident #55's pharmaceutical consultant report dated 12/10/2024 revealed, in part, a recommendation for a Complete Blood Count ([CBC] a commonly ordered blood test that measured several blood components to evaluate a person's overall health and detect a wide range of disorders) to be completed on Resident #55 every 6 months. Review of Resident #55's January 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 01/03/2025 to complete a CBC for Resident #55 every 6 months beginning 01/07/2025. Review of Resident #55's chart/medical record and Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence, a CBC was completed in January 2025 as ordered for Resident #55. Review of Resident #55's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received dental services for 2 (Resident #61, Resident #75) of 2 (Resident #61, Resident #75) sampled residents reviewed for dental services. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Dentist policy and procedure revealed, in part, the facility will ensure residents are seen by the dentist as needed. Further review revealed the facility will assure the dental needs of the resident were met. Resident #61 Observation on 01/27/2025 at 11:12AM revealed Resident #61 was missing several upper and lower teeth. In an interview on 01/27/2025 at 11:15AM, Resident #61 indicated he wanted to see the dentist. Resident #61 further indicated he did not have dentures, but wanted them. Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed there was no documented evidence, and the provider could not provide any documented evidence, Resident #61 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility's dumpster was maintained in a sanitary manner. Findings: Observation on 01/28/2025 at 10:35AM revealed the facility's dumpster was missing a lid and open to air. Further observation revealed loose trash was on the ground around the dumpster. Observation on 01/28/2025 at 12:40PM revealed the facility's dumpster was missing a lid and open to air. Further observation revealed loose trash was on the ground around the dumpster. In an interview on 01/28/2025 at 12:48PM, S4Dietary Manager indicated she was aware the dumpster's right side lid was missing, and it should not have been. In an interview on 01/30/2025 at 11:46AM, S1Administrator indicated the facility's dumpster's right side lid was missing, and the trash should have been contained. S1Administrator further indicated the facility's dumpster and the area around the dumpster was not maintained in a sanitary manner, and it should have been.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment included active involvement from direct care staff, residents, and residents' representatives in its development. Findings: Review of the facility's facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed, in part, there was no documented evidence direct care staff including a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) were involved in the development of the facility's facility assessment. Further review revealed there was no documented evidence a resident and/or a resident representative was involved in the development of the facility's facility assessment. In an interview on 01/30/2025 at 1:00PM, S1Administrator confirmed the facility could not present any documented evidence direct care staff, residents, and residents' representatives were involved in the development of the facility's facility assessment dated [DATE].
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer the pneumococcal (a bacterial infection caused by Streptococcus pneumonia bacterial) vaccine for 2 (Resident #43, Resident #81) of 5 (Resident #30, Resident #43, Resident #77, Resident #80, Resident #81) sampled residents investigated for pneumococcal vaccines. Findings: Resident #43 Review of Resident #43's vaccine consent form revealed Resident #43 signed a consent to receive the pneumococcal vaccine on 04/05/2024. There was no documented evidence and the facility did not present documented evidence the pneumococcal vaccine was medically contraindicated for Resident #43 or that the pneumococcal vaccine was administered to Resident #43 as per the consent signed on 04/05/2024. In an interview on 1/30/2025 at 9:16AM, S1Administrator confirmed the consent for the pneumococcal vaccine was signed for Resident #43, but there was no documented evidence the pneumococcal vaccine was medically contraindicated for Resident #43 or administered to Resident #43. Resident #81 Review of Resident #81's vaccine consent form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) vaccine was administered for 1 (Resident #81) of 5 (Resident #30, Resident #43, Resident #70, Resident #80, Resident #81) sampled residents investigated for COVID-19 vaccines. Findings: Review of Resident #81's vaccine consent revealed Resident #81's responsible party signed a consent for Resident #81 to receive the COVID-19 vaccine on 10/11/2024. There was no documented evidence and the facility did not present documented evidence the COVID-19 vaccine was medically contraindicated for Resident #81 or that the COVID-19 vaccine was administered as per the consent signed on 10/11/2024. In an interview on 01/30/2025 at 9:15AM, S1Administrator confirmed the consent for the COVID-19 vaccine was signed by Resident #81's responsible party, but there was no documented evidence the COVID-19 vaccine was medically contraindicated or administered to Resident #81.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure new individualized fall prevention interventions were implemented and/or reviewed for effectiveness to prevent future falls for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Findings included: Review of the facility's undated Fall Prevention Program policy and procedure revealed, in part, the facility will protect residents from injury from falls. Further review revealed, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) coordinator will update interventions on the resident's fall care plan with any new occurrence of falls. Review of the facility's undated Post-Falls Protocol policy and procedure revealed, in part, the unit nurse will assess the resident from head to toe and document that assessment along with circumstances of the fall in the resident's chart. Further review revealed, one new fall intervention shall be implemented for the resident, documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for a sanitary environment. Findings included: Review of facility's Bathroom Policy with revision date of April 2006, revealed, in part, bathrooms should be cleaned daily and daily cleaning included cleaning walls, wash basins, commodes and floors Resident #1 Observation on 11/21/2023 at 12:36PM, revealed Resident #1's room had a brown smear noted on the wall above the trash can. Observation on 11/21/2024 at 4:20PM, revealed Resident #1's room had a brown smear noted on the wall above the trash can. In an interview on 11/21/2024 at 4:22PM, S1Administrator confirmed the brown substance on the wall above the trash can in Resident #1's room. S1Administrator further indicated the substance should not be on the wall above the trash can. Resident #2 Observation on 11/25/2024 at 8:40AM, revealed an isolation cart at Resident #2's room door. Further observation revealed the isolation cart was visibly dirty with a brown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an allegation of neglect related to an injury of unknown origin for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention policy dated 2002 revealed, in part, a full investigation will include any other witness who was in the area, and written and signed statements will be obtained. Further review revealed all records of the investigation will be kept on file. Review of the facility's initiated incident report dated 07/09/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a dislocation of the left hip which was discovered on 07/09/2024 at 8:20 a.m. Further review revealed Resident #1 was unable to voice how the injury occurred, and no falls involving Resident #1 were reported. The above mentioned incident report also revealed on 07/08/2024, S7Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) put resident #1 to bed at approximately 6:15 p.m. in a supine position with an abductor cushion (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan: 1. Was revised to include a decline in a resident's activities of daily living [ADLs] (Resident #1); and, 2. Was revised after a resident sustained a fall(s) (Resident #1). This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an ARD of 06/11/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 which indicated severely impaired cognition. Further review revealed Resident #1 was dependent on staff for transfers and functional mobility, and had one fall which resulted in a major injury since his previous assessment. Review of Resident #1's Incident Report dated 05/29/2024 revealed Resident #1 had a witness fall from his wheelchair in the dining/day room resulting in a left hip fracture. Review of Resident #1's Incident Report dated 07/20/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, observation, and interviews, the facility failed failed to ensure staff was available at all times to provide care and services to meet the resident's needs by failing to ensure staff was not sleeping while on duty. This deficient practice was identified for 1 staff member S6Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) observed for 1 of 3 days during the survey. Findings: Review of facility's Employee Code of Conduct revealed, in part, sleeping while on duty was a violation that would constitute cause for immediate termination. Review of S6CNA's personnel record revealed, in part, S6CNA signed the Employee Code of Conduct on 07/08/2024 which indicated he understood and would abide by the rules of conduct while on or off duty on the facility premises. Review of facility's Daily Nursing Staff Schedule dated 07/29/2024 revealed, in part, S6CNA was assigned to provide services to residents on the day shift from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on floor x. Further review revealed S6CNA was assigned to provide care and services to 7 residents during this time frame. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments were transmitted and accepted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within 14 days of the resident assessment being completed for 4 (Resident #12, Resident #52, Resident #62, and Resident #278) of 4 (Resident #12, Resident #52, Resident #62, and Resident #278) sampled residents reviewed for Resident Assessment. Findings: Resident #12 Review of Resident #12's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/08/2023 revealed, in part, a completion date of 11/27/2023. Review of the facility's Final Validation Report for Resident #12's MDS with an ARD of 11/08/2023 revealed the MDS was rejected. There was no documented evidence and the facility presented no documented evidence the facility had transmitted an approvable MDS for Resident #12's ARD of 11/08/2023 from completion of the MDS on 11/27/2023 until the start of the survey on 02/05/2024. Resident #52 Review of Resident #52's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/08/2023 revealed, in part, a completion date of 11/22/2023.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure water accessible to residents did not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit for 9 (Bathroom A, Bathroom B, Bathroom D, Bathroom E, Bathroom F, Bathroom H, Bathroom I, Bathroom J, and Bathroom L) of 12 (Bathroom A, Bathroom B, Bathroom C, Bathroom D, Bathroom E, Bathroom F, Bathroom G, Bathroom H, Bathroom I, Bathroom J, Bathroom K, and Bathroom L) bathrooms observed for water temperature. Findings: Observations on 02/05/2024 between 10:10 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. of resident rooms on Hall W and Hall X revealed bathroom sink water temperatures were hot to touch, and surveyors were unable to maintain their hand in the flow of water for more than 5 seconds due to high temperature. In an interview on 02/05/2024 at 12:20 p.m., S6Facilities Manager stated he thought the maximum safe temperature was 120 degrees Fahrenheit, but was not sure. Observations on 02/05/2024 between 1:10 p.m. and 1:25 p.m. revealed S6Facilities Manager obtained water temperatures (in degrees Fahrenheit) as followed: 1:10 p.m. 123.3 degrees in Bathroom A; 1:11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) had completed annual competencies as required for 3 (S17CNA, S23CNA, S24CNA) of 5 (S9CNASuperviosr, S17CNA, S23CNA, S24CNA, and S27CNA) CNAs personnel records reviewed for competencies. Findings: Review of S17CNA's personnel file revealed, the last annual competency documented was 07/28/2022. Further review revealed no documented evidence and the facility presented no documented evidence of the facility had completed competencies on S17CNA since the CNA was re-hired on 12/19/2022. Review of S23CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, a hire date of 10/17/2019 with a re-hire date of 09/19/2023. Further review revealed, the last competency documented was 02/14/2022. Review of S24CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, a hire date of 06/11/2023 with a re-hire date of 12/15/2023. Review revealed, S24CNA's competency was without a completion date and an overall evaluation of S24CNA's competency of skills to be provided to residents. In an interview on 02/07/2023 at 1:00 p.m., S13Human…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review for every certified nurse aide (CNA) at least once every 12 months for 1 (S17CNA) of 5 (S9CNASupervisor, S17CNA, S23CNA, S24CNA, and S27CNA) CNA personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of S17CNA's personnel record revealed, in part, a hire date of 11/06/2020 with a re-hire date of 12/19/2022. Further review revealed no documented evidence and the facility presented no documented evidence the facility had completed an annual performance review for S17CNA since the CNA was re-hired on 12/19/2022. In an interview on 02/08/2024 at 3:26 p.m., S1Administrator confirmed S17CNA did not have an annual performance review completed in the last 12 months. There was no documented evidence and the facility did not present any documented evidence of an annual performance review being completed for S17CNA.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff performed hand hygiene during dining observation for 3 (Hall W, Hall X, and Hall Z) of 4 (Hall W, Hall X, Hall Y, and Hall Z) sampled halls observed during dining observations; 2. Ensure the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) removed their gloves and completed hand hygiene during incontinence care for 1 (S9CNA Supervisor) of 1 staff observed during incontinence care; and, 3. Ensure a system of surveillance was in place for water management to prevent Legionella. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy and most recently reviewed on 02/08/2024 revealed, in part, staff should perform hand hygiene before and after direct contact with residents, before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care, and before and after assisting a resident with meals. Review of the facility's policy and procedure title, Employee Education on Performing Hand Hygiene most recently reviewed on 02/08/2024 revealed, in part, hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop policies and procedures to investigate injuries of unknown origin for 1 (Resident #42) of 1 (Resident #42) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Resident Abuse, and Abuse Recognition, Reporting, and Investigation policies and procedures revealed no documented evidence and the facility presented no documented evidence of the facility having developed policies and procedures on how to identify, investigate, and reporting requirements for injuries of unknown origin. In an interview on 02/08/2024 at 2:29 p.m., S1Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy and procedure on how to identify, investigate, and reporting requirements for injuries of unknown origin.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report a bruise with an unknown origin within 2 hours of the bruise having been identified for 1 (Resident #42) of 1 (Resident #42) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of Resident #42's Nurse's Notes dated 01/30/2024 revealed Resident #42 was noted to have a bruise under Resident #42's right breast. Further review revealed no documented assessment of the bruise nor any documented evidence of a potential cause for the bruise under Resident #42's right breast. Review of Resident #42's Wound Care Notes dated 01/30/2024 revealed no documented evidence of an assessment of the bruise under Resident #42's right breast or potential cause of the bruise. In an interview on 02/06/2024 at 1:54 p.m., S35Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated on 01/30/2024 she noted a bruise under Resident #42's right breast which was approximately the size of a nickel and was purple in color. S35LPN further stated the staff prior to my shift had not reported any new skin conditions and/or bruising. S35LPN stated she reported Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have evidence that injuries of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #42) of 1 (Resident #42) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of Resident #42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/20/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 (score of 0-7 indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment). Further review revealed Resident #42 had altered level of consciousness with behavioral fluctuations. Review of Resident #42's nurse's notes dated 01/30/2024 at 6:25 a.m. revealed Resident #42 was noted to have scratches to her chest, scratches to her abdomen, and a bruise underneath her right breast. Further review revealed the nurse asked the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) what happened, and the CNA replied Resident #42 was being combative. Review revealed the nurse then asked the CNA what happened to Resident #42's arm, chest, abdomen and right breast and the CNA stated the scratches to Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Louisiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (LaPost) was placed on residents records per the care plan for 2 (Resident #42 and Resident #63) of 2 (Resident #42 and Resident #63) sampled residents reviewed for Advanced Directives; and 2. A Resident with a significant weight loss was care planned for nutritional interventions for 1 (Resident #18) of 2 (Resident #18 and Resident #36) sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings: 1. Resident #42 Review of Resident #42's record revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, in part, cerebral vascular accident (CVA). Further review revealed there was no documented evidence of advanced directives. Review of Resident #42's Physician Progress Notes dated [DATE] revealed, in part, Resident #42 was a full code (Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was to be initiated if found without breathing or a pulse). Review of Resident #42's Care Plan with a goal date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain the resident's most recent plan of care, certification of terminal illness, and documentation of services provided for 1 (Resident #26) of 1 (Resident #26) sampled residents reviewed for hospice. Findings: Review of the facility's contract with the local hospice agency revealed, in part, the hospice agency shall develop the plan of care specifying information pertinent to the resident's treatment. The plan will be reviewed by the hospice agency on a minimum of every two weeks and updated as necessary by the hospice agency. Review of Resident #26's hospice binder revealed Resident #26 was admitted to hospice on 01/19/2024. Further review of Resident #26's hospice binder revealed no documented evidence of Resident #26's certification of terminal illness, hospice plan of care, nor any documents for services provided. In an interview on 02/07/2024 at 4:00 p.m., S33Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated she was aware Resident #26 was receiving hospice services, however S33LPN was not aware of all the hospice disciplines…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all complaint surveys since the last annual survey were available for resident review. Findings: In an interview on 02/06/2024 at 9:26 a.m., Resident #15 stated the state survey results located at the front entrance did not contain the most current survey results and she had to request to see the last complaint survey. Resident #15 further stated the last survey she had seen was from 2022. Observation on 02/06/2024 at 10:10 a.m. in the front entrance revealed a dark blue binder, labeled survey results binder, on the bottom shelf of the table. Review of the survey results binder revealed the last survey posted in the binder was dated 03/16/2023. Further review revealed no documented evidence and the facility presented no documented evidence of the survey results from the 07/12/2023 complaint survey having been available for review. In an interview on 02/06/2024 10:30 a.m., S1Administrator confirmed the binder mentioned above was the survey results binder for the residents to access. S1Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$389,089 in federal fines across 6 penalties.
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2026-01-23
- $320,520 — penalty dated 2025-01-30
- $8,811 — penalty dated 2024-02-08
- $8,811 — penalty dated 2024-02-08
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-02-08
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-02-08
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST. MARGARET'S FOUNDATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/11/2015 |
| STANSBERRY, LAWRENCE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/11/2015 |
| BROUSSARD, COURTNEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/22/2020 |
| DION, MARIANNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/07/2019 |
| MYERS, DAVID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/19/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $555K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in LA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195517. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.