Carroll Health and Rehab LLC
307 N Castleman St, Oak Grove, LA 71263 · For profit - Individual · 120 certified beds · (318) 428-3249 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $37,884 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-28)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.5% | 17.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.4% | 5.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 1.2% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.5% | 2.3% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.0% | 3.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.7% | 17.9% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.8% | 23.2% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.2% | 94.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 14.1% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.8% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 45.2% | 22.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.8% | 3.1% | 1.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 59.0% | 76.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.33 | 2.56 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 5.14 | 2.74 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.9%CMS range 45.2–68.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.2%CMS range 9.5–18.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 5.5–13.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.21 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 75.9 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY I. Based on observation, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to have an adequate system in place to ensure residents at risk for elopement are supervised to prevent elopement from the facility for 1 (#73) of 3 (#8, #72, and #73) residents reviewed for elopement. The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #73 on 07/21/2025. Resident #73 was last observed on 07/21/2025 at 9:51 p.m. Resident #73 was picked up by police on 07/22/2025 at 6:28 a.m. after being notified of Resident #73 pacing on the four-lane highway approximately 0.9 miles from the facility. The police returned Resident #73 to the facility on [DATE] at 6:52 a.m. without injury. Resident #73 exited the building through a window in his room. The deficient practice had the likelihood to cause more than minimal harm to any residents residing in the facility at risk for elopement. S1Manager and S3Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 07/24/2025 at 7:54 p.m.The Immediate Jeopardy was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-07-28 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled its resources to be used effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #73) of 3 (#8, #72 and #73) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. S3Director of Nursing (DON) failed to 1) notify staff that Resident #73 was assessed to be at risk for elopement and 2) initiate the interim care plan with appropriate interventions to prevent elopement after S3DON assessed Resident #73 to be at risk for elopement.The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #73 on 07/21/2025. Resident #73 was last observed on 07/21/2025 at 9:51 p.m. Resident #73 was picked up by police on 07/22/2025 at 6:28 a.m. after being notified of Resident #73 pacing on the four lane highway approximately 0.9 miles from the facility. The police returned Resident #73 to the facility on [DATE] at 6:52 a.m. without injury. Resident #73…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services. The facility had: 1) excessively low weekend staff during Fiscal Year Quarter 2 2025 dated 01/01/2025 to 03/31/2025 and 2) insufficient staff on: 06/08/2025, 06/14/2025, 06/22/2025, and 06/28/2025.Findings:Review of the facility's Payroll-Based Journal (PB&J) Staffing Report revealed the facility triggered excessively low weekend staff for Fiscal Year Quarter 2 2025 dated 01/01/2025 to 03/31/2025.Review of the facility's January 2025 weekend personnel staffing pattern revealed insufficient staff for the following dates: 01/04/2025, 01/05/2025, 01/11/2025, 01/12/2025, 01/18/2025, 01/19/2025, 01/25/2025, and 01/26/2025.Review of the facility's February 2025 weekend personnel staffing pattern revealed insufficient staff for the following dates: 02/01/2025, 02/02/2025, 02/08/2025, 02/09/2025, 02/15/2025, 02/16/2025, 02/22/2025, and 02/23/2025. Review of the facility's March 2025 weekend personnel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-28 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that individual financial records are available to the resident through quarterly statements for 1 (#6) of 1 (#6) residents reviewed for personal funds out of a total sample of 37 residents. Findings:Review of the facility's Resident Funds policy (undated) revealed in part:Purpose: Ensure than an individual record is established for each resident on which only those transactions involving his/her personal funds are recorded and maintained. Procedure:3. The individual financial record must be available to the resident through quarterly statements and upon request. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14 which indicated that the resident is cognitively intact.On 07/23/2025 at 1:30 p.m., a phone interview with S5Business Office Manager (BOM) related to the management of resident finances was conducted. During the interview, S5BOM was asked to confirm the delivery method of quarterly statements. S5BOM stated that quarterly statements are mailed by way of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 4 (#1, #2, #22, #43) of 6 (#1, #2, #6, #22, #40, #43) sampled residents reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility failed to ensure that residents' wheelchairs were maintained in good repair.Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acquired absence of left leg below knee, Type 2 diabetes, and epilepsy. Further review revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 used a wheelchair for ambulation and required supervision/touch assistance for most activities of daily living. On 07/21/2025 at 9:50 a.m., Resident #1 was in his wheelchair in the hall. An observation of his wheelchair revealed the left wheelchair arm padding was cracked and needed to be repaired. Further observation revealed the wheelchair wheels had a build-up of dirt and grime. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-28 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to 1) ensure a physician's order for bed rails was obtained for residents, 2) assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to the installation of bed rails, and 3) ensure care plans reflected the use of bed rails for 4 (#2, #6, #50, #65) of 4 residents reviewed for bedrails. Findings: Review of the undated facility policy for Bedrails revealed the following, in part: 1.) Assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bedrails prior to installation and ensure that the bed's dimensions are appropriate for the resident's size and weight. The facility will assess the resident's need for bedrails and all factors involved, including alternatives. Alternatives to bedrails will always be attempted before consideration of bedrail application. Documentation in the resident's record will reflect this assessment and related information, including how the alternatives failed to meet the resident’s assessed needs. What assessed medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation of medication administration, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not 5% or greater. The facility had a 19.35% medication error rate with 6 medication errors for 2 (#26, #29) of 5 (#26, #29, #46, #49, #57) residents observed for medication administration. The facility had 6 medication administration errors out of 31 opportunities. The facility's current census was 65 residents. Findings:Review of the facility's Administering Medications Policy revised December 2012 revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed.Policy Interpretations and Implementation: 3. Medications must be administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time frame. Resident #26 An interview with S10Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 07/23/2025 at 10:15 a.m., revealed she had not started to give medications for the residents on her hall, which was the hall where resident #26 resided. On 07/23/2025 at 10:40 a.m., an observation during medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-28 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies. Findings:Review of the facility assessment revealed the last facility assessment was done on 06/25/2024. On 07/23/2025 at 9:40 a.m. interview with S3Director of Nursing (DON), S2Corporate Registered Nurse (RN) and S1Manager confirmed the last facility assessment was noted on 06/25/2024.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be free from chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms by having residents with orders for psychotropic medications greater than 14 days for 2 (#5 and #23) of 5 (#1, #5, #6, #12 and #23) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Resident #5 Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 06/13/2025. Resident #5 had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated Resident #5 was cognitively intact for daily decision making. Review of the July 2025 physician’s orders revealed an order for Klonopin 1 milligram (mg) to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (#40) of 1 resident reviewed for contractures and 2 (#72, #73) of 3 (#8, #72, #73) residents reviewed for elopement. Findings: Resident 73 Review of the record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 07/15/2025 with diagnoses of vascular dementia, hemiplegia, cerebrovascular accident, heart failure, and mild cognitive impairment. Review of the Medicare 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, which indicated severe cognitive impairment for daily decision making. Review of the Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 07/15/2025 revealed Resident #73 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 (#11) of 3 (#11, #47, #50) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.Findings:Review of the facility`s policy (undated) related to Skin and Wound Management revealed the following in part: Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol Assessment and Recognition 1. The nursing staff and practitioner will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure ulcers; for example, immobility, recent weight loss, and a history of pressure ulcer(s). Record review revealed Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, epilepsy, abnormal posture, melanoma of scalp, and age related disability. Record review of Resident #11's skin assessment using the Braden Score System dated 06/27/2025 revealed a score of 18 which indicated he was at risk for developing pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 (#75) of 2 (#4 & #75) residents reviewed for urinary catheter. Findings:Review of the facility's Urinary Catheter Care Policy dated September 2014 revealed in part:Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections.Infection Control2.b. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Review of the record for Resident #75 revealed an admission dated of 01/08/2019 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, heart disease, urinary retention, and dementia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated that Resident #75 had moderate cognitive impairment for daily decision making. On 07/21/2025 at 11:40 a.m. and 07/22/2025 at 9:05 a.m., observations of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications by failing to monitor lab results for a resident receiving anti-seizure medication for 1 (#12) of 5 (#1, #5, #6, #12, #23) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings: Review of the record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, initial encounter; other seizures; altered mental status and encephalopathy.On 07/22/2025 at 10:00 a.m., a review of Resident #12's current care plan revealed the facility should obtain lab/diagnostic work as ordered and report results to physician.On 07/22/2025 at 10:15 a.m., a review of Resident #12's active physician orders revealed an order for Valproic Acid oral solution 15 milliliters (ml) by mouth every morning ordered 04/10/2025 and Valproic Acid oral solution 20 ml by mouth every evening for seizures ordered 04/09/2025.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to properly store the ice scoop utilized in serving ice to residents in a sanitary manner.Findings: On 07/21/2025 at 8:15 a.m., an observation of the facility's kitchen revealed that an ice scoop was being stored inside an ice chest that contained ice for resident use.On 07/21/2025 at 8:22 a.m., an observation with S8Dietary Supervisor confirmed the ice scoop was being stored in the ice chest containing resident ice.On 07/23/2025 at 11:45 a.m., S3Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of dietary staff storing an ice scoop in the ice chest for resident use.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee met at least quarterly with all required members present.Findings: Review of the QAA committee meetings revealed quarterly meetings with required staff present were recorded on 08/08/2024, 11/21/2024, and 04/24/2025. On 07/23/2025 at 4:20 p.m., an interview/observation with S2Corporate Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed records of the quarterly meetings with required staff present were recorded on 08/08/2024, 11/21/2024, and 04/24/2025. On 07/23/2025 at 4:20 p.m., an interview with S3Director of Nursing confirmed four quarterly QAA committee meetings with all required staff present had not been completed in the past year.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment by failing to ensure that Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented as ordered for 1 (#47) of 3 (#11, #47, #50) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.Findings:Review of the undated EBP policy revealed, in part:Purpose: Prevent the spread of novel or targeted multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs)EBP expand the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) beyond situations in which exposure to blood and body fluids is anticipated and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing.EBP apply to:Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (i.e., central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator) regardless of MDRO colonization status. On 07/21/2025 at 9:36 a.m. and 07/22/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to provide in-services, at least 12 hours in a year, sufficient to ensure the continued competence of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) for 3 (S12CNA, S14CNA, S15CNA) of 5 (S11CNA, S12CNA, S13CNA, S14CNA, S15CNA) CNAs reviewed for in-service training. Findings:Review of the personnel record for S12CNA revealed a hire date of 07/02/2021. Further review of the personnel file revealed no documented evidence of 12 hours of annual training. Review of the personnel record for S14CNA revealed a hire date of 04/19/2023. Further review of the personnel file revealed no documented evidence of 12 hours of annual training. Review of the personnel record for S15CNA revealed a hire date of 05/30/2012. Further review of the personnel file revealed no documented evidence of 12 hours of annual training. On 07/22/2025 at 4:40 p.m., an interview with S3Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the required annual in-service training had not been provided to S12CNA, S14CNA and S15CNA.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 (#2, #5, #6, and #7) of 4 residents reviewed for infection control. S7Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) failed to clean the whirlpool according to manufacturer's guidelines. Residents #2, #5, #6, and #7 received whirlpool baths three times a week while having open wounds to their body. Residents #2, #5, #6 and #7 were currently receiving antibiotics related to wound infections. Findings: Review of the whirlpool manufacturer`s guidelines for cleaning whirlpool revealed the following in part: Clean and disinfect the tub and swivel lift after every bath with cleaner/disinfectant. 1. Raise the swivel lift completely and rotate or swing the chair back into the tub. 2. Close and lock the door. 3. Press the tub fill button and turn the temperature control knob all the way to the left to its warmest level to heat the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a sanitary environment and to help prevent cross contamination for 1 (#1) of 1 (#1) residents observed for wound care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the Wound Care Nurse (WCN) contaminating a cream used to treat a resident's burn and by storing a contaminated bottle of Dermal Wound Cleanser (DWC) inside of the wound care cart. Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included in part, acquired absence of right leg below knee, Type 1 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease. Review of the medical record revealed a physician's order dated 01/11/2025 for Silvadene External Cream 1% (Silver Sulfadiazine) apply to right thigh topically one time a day related to patient's other non-compliance with medication regimen; Burn to right thigh-apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to immediately consult the resident's physician when a resident had a change in condition or started a new treatment for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #3, and #4) residents reviewed for accidents. The deficient practice was evidenced by the nurse failing to notify the physician in a timely manner after she observed blisters on resident #1's skin. Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included in part, acquired absence of right leg below knee, Type 1 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease. Review of the significant change in status assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #10 had a brief interview for mental status score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact with his daily decision making skills. Further review of the assessment revealed that resident #1 was independent with his ability to eat. Review of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (#7) of 1 (#7) residents observed smoking in an unsafe manner. The deficient practice was evidenced by resident #7 tossing his lit cigarette butt on the concrete when left unsupervised outside in the smoking area. Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and nicotine dependence. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed that resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 05 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment with his daily decision making skills. Review of the care plan revealed that resident #7 was a smoker. Further review revealed the approaches included that resident #7 required supervision while smoking. On 01/28/2025 at approximately 12:18 p.m., an observation revealed resident #7 smoking a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure policies were being followed for 1 (#10) of 7 (#5, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, and #12) residents reviewed for smoking. The deficient practice was evidenced by the facility not having documented evidence of a Safe Smoking Evaluation completed quarterly for resident #7. Findings: Smoking/Tobacco Usage Waiver Smoking Policy (Undated): Review of the policy revealed it is the policy of the nursing facility to enforce a smoke-free environment within the facility for both residents and staff to ensure the rights, safety, and well-being of all residents and staff. Review of the smoking procedure included, but was not limited to: Residents who smoke will be assessed on admission, quarterly, and when there is a significant change in the resident's ability to handle their smoking products. Findings: Review of the medical record revealed that resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the physician's progress notes dated 12/07/2024 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff by having environmental concerns throughout the inside and outside of the building. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 51 residents that resided in the building. Findings: On 11/04/2024 at 8:45 a.m. observation of the kitchen revealed the ceiling contained acoustic suspended tiles. The ceiling tiles were observed to have old water stains, the tiles by the ceiling vents were sagging, and 2 holes in the ceiling approximately 4 inches by 4 inches were observed. On 11/12/2024 at 11:40 a.m., an interview with S5Dietary Manager confirmed the ceiling tiles in the kitchen were stained with water damage, sagging, had 2 holes in the ceiling, and the ceiling needed to be repaired. On 11/4/2024 at 2:30 p.m. observation of the hallway floors throughout the facility revealed the floors had a buildup of dirt and grime and needed to be cleaned. On 11/04/2024 at 4:00 p.m. S1Administrator was notified of the hallway floors throughout…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff were able to demonstrate competencies and skills necessary to care for residents needs for 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #6) of 4 residents. The facility failed to have documentation of wound care, tracheostomy care, and medication administration. Findings: Review of Medication Administration General Guidelines policy and procedure dated 07/2024 revealed the following, in part: Procedure: 9. Only licensed or legally authorized personnel who prepare a medication may administer it. This individual records the administration on the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR)/electronic MAR or Treatment Administration Record (TAR)/electronic TAR after the medication is given. At the end of each medication pass, the person administering the medications reviews the MAR/TAR to ascertain that all necessary doses were administered and all administered doses were documented. In no case should the individual who administered the medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 (#5) of 3 (#1, #5 and #8) residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to complete an Accident and Incident Report per the facility's policy and the facility failed to perform a thorough investigation after resident #1 was found to have illegal drugs in his possession. Findings: Review of the facility's Accident and Incident Documentation and Investigation Resident Incident policy undated revealed: Policy: Accidents and/or incidents involving resident care will be investigated and documented on the Risk Assessment section of Point Click Care (PCC) system. An incident is defined as an occurrence which is not consistent with the routine operation of the facility or the routine care of a particular resident. Accidents and incidents will be analyzed for trends or patterns to enable the facility to enhance preventive measures to reduce the occurrence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, and #6) residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy dated 04/01/2024 revealed Definition and Scope Enhanced Barrier Precautions are infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Example of Use EBP involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices) Review of resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/28/2024 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, abdominal pain, severe sepsis, bacterial peritonitis, abscess of vulva, peripheral vascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident with wounds or history of wounds received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, to prevent infection, and to prevent wounds for 3 (#1, #2, and #3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure weekly skin assessments were performed. Findings: Review of the provider's policy entitled Preventive Skin Care with a revision date of 07/2024 revealed in part: That it is the practice of this facility to provide routine preventive skin care. This policy will serve as a guide to facility staff with regard to clinically acceptable techniques to be applied for skin care prevention. Procedures include: complete a weekly skin evaluation on all residents; evaluate interventions that may be implemented based upon the resident's Risk Evaluation and develop an individualized care plan for preventive skin care based upon evaluation. Review of the provider's policy entitled Weekly Skin Audit dated 07/2024 revealed in-part: a skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal and mental abuse for 1 (#4) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy dated 07/2024 revealed in-part: Policy: The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardian, surrogates, friends, or any other individual. Definitions: a) Abuse: Willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. This includes the depravation by an individual, including a caretaker of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental and psychological well-being. Abuse may be resident-to-resident, staff-to- resident, family-to-resident, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the provider failed to: 1) ensure an alleged violation involving verbal and mental abuse witnessed by staff was reported immediately to the Administrator and Director of Nursing and 2) ensure all allegations of verbal abuse/mental abuse were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to State Survey Agency in accordance with State Laws for 1 (#4) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's current Abuse Prevention Policy dated 7/2024 revealed in-part: Policy: The Facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardian, surrogates, friends, or any other individual. Definitions: a) Abuse: Willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0836 — patternEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to be incompliance with all applicable Federal, State, and Local Laws, regulations, and codes by S1Administrator response time from residence to facility being over one hour. Findings: During an interview on 09/10/2024 at 10:35 a.m., S1Administrator revealed she lived 1.5 hours away from the facility. Review of S1Administrator's employee file revealed her residence listed was at least a 1.5 hour drive to the facility. During an interview on 09/17/2024 at 1:30 p.m., S1Administrator confirmed that her response time from her residence to the facility was over one hour.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of needs for 5 (#15, #17, #18, #26, #29 and #43) of 5 sampled residents and had the potential to affect all 44 residents that reside in the facility. Findings: Resident #17 Record review revealed resident #17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated no cognitive impairment. On 06/24/2024 at 9:15 a.m., an interview with resident #17 revealed sometimes the facility runs out of wipes when they are providing care. Resident #26 Record review revealed resident #26's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. On 06/24/2024 at 9:43 a.m., an interview with resident #26 revealed sometimes the facility does not have enough wipes to provide care. Resident #29 Record review revealed resident #29 was admitted on [DATE]. Further review revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The deficient practice affected 9 (#8, #11, #15, #17, #23, #26, #27, #29 & #49) of 9 sampled residents and had the potential to affect all 44 residents that resided in the facility. Findings: On 06/24/2024 at 9:15 a.m., 06/25/2024 at 9:28 a.m., and 06/26/2024 at 8:46 a.m., observations of resident #17's bathroom revealed a black substance in the toilet. On 06/24/2024 at 9:37 a.m., 06/25/2024 at 9:30 a.m., and 06/26/2024 at 8:50 a.m., observations of resident #23's bathroom revealed a black substance in the toilet and a foul odor noted. On 06/24/2024 at 9:43 a.m., 06/25/2024 at 9:32 a.m., and 06/26/24 at 8:55 a.m., observations of resident #26's bathroom revealed a black substance in the toilet. On 06/24/2024 at 10:30 a.m., an observation of resident #29's room revealed there was a urine odor noted. Further observation on 06/25/2024 at 12:35 p.m. revealed resident #29's door had spills and splatters on it and dirt and grime was on the closet drawers and around…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act within 24 hours to the stage agency and one or more law enforcement entities for 1 (#34) of 1 (#34) residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. Findings: Review of the facilities Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure (policy was not dated) revealed in-part: Misappropriation of Resident Property: The deliberate misplacement, exploitations, or wrongful temporary or permanent use of a resident's personal belongings or money without the resident's consent. Suspected or substantiated cases of resident abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment shall be thoroughly investigated, documented, and reported to the physician, families, and/or representative, and as required by state guidelines. In addition, the facility will follow Section 1150B of the Social Security Act's time limits for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations of misappropriation of resident property are thoroughly investigated in a timely manner for 1 (#34) of 1 (#34) resident reviewed for personal property. Findings: Review of the facilities undated Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure revealed in-part: Policy: The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual. Definitions: Misappropriation of Resident Property: The deliberate misplacement, exploitations, or wrongful temporary or permanent use of a resident's personal belongings or money without the resident's consent. Investigation: The facility will initiate at the time of any finding of potential abuse or neglect an investigation to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming, and personal hygiene for 3 (#6, #17 #23) of 4 (#6, #11, #17, #23) sampled residents for Activities of Daily Living as evidenced by, 1) failing to ensure resident's clothing was clean and free of food debris and 2) failing to ensure resident's fingernails and toenails were trimmed and clean. Findings: Resident #6 Review of the record for resident #6 revealed a date of admission of 07/23/2015 with following diagnoses: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, cerebral disease, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed resident #6 had a brief interview for mental status score of 2. A score of 00-07 indicated that resident #6 was severely impaired with daily decision making skills. Review of functional abilities and goals for eating revealed setup or clean-up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for 5 (S20Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), S21CNA, S22CNA, S23CNA, and S24CNA) personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of the personnel record for S20CNA revealed a hire date of 03/26/2024. Further review of the personnel record revealed no documented evidence of skills checks or competency evaluations for S20CNA. Review of the personnel record for S21CNA revealed a hire date of 07/02/2021. Further review of the personnel record revealed no documented evidence of skills checks or competency evaluations for S21CNA. Review of the personnel record for S22CNA revealed a hire date of 07/28/2023. Further review of the personnel record revealed no documented evidence of skills checks or competency evaluations for S22CNA. Review of the personnel record for S23CNA revealed a hire date of 10/05/2023. Further review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation of the medication pass, review of physician orders and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it is free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater by having 4 errors out of 33 opportunities for a medication error rate of 12.12%. (Residents #41, #13) Findings: Resident 41 Observation of the medication pass for resident #41 on 06/25/2024 at 8:27 a.m. revealed that S15Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered 6 oral medications and 1 eye medication. Review of the June 2024 physician orders for resident #41 revealed the high blood pressure medication Losartan 25 milligrams (mg) administer 1 tablet every day by mouth at 9:00 a.m. Observation of the medication pass revealed Losartan 25 mg was not observed to be administered to resident #41. Interview with S10Registered Nurse (RN) on 06/26/2024 at 11:00 a.m. confirmed that the medication Losartan 25mg, 1 tablet every day should have been administered to resident #41. Observation of the medication pass for resident #41 on 06/25/2024 at 8:27 a.m. revealed that the eye medication, Carboxymethyl Cellulose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure food was defrosted properly. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 44 residents who received meals served from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility Policy for Safely Thawing Food (no date noted) revealed in part: How to Thaw Food Safely: 3). Thawing in cold water - fill a bowl with cold water and leave the tap water running over the food as it thaws. This does require a lot of water, but it will keep the surface temperature of your food from growing bacteria too rapidly. If you can, keep your food in its original container or in a plastic bag to protect your kitchen sink and counter from germs. On 6/25/2024 at 6:50 a.m. during a follow-up visit to the kitchen, an observation revealed a large amount of chicken breasts submerged in water in the kitchen sink and there was no running cold water noted. Further observation revealed the chicken breasts were not placed in a container in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) record and interview, the facility failed to have documented evidence of having a QAA meeting at least quarterly for the year 2024. Findings: Review of the QAA binder revealed no documented evidence of the facility having a QAA meeting for the first quarter of 2024 to address facility issues. On 06/26/2024 at 5:50 p.m., an interview with S1Administrator confirmed there was no documented evidence of a QAA meeting for the first quarter of 2024.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review and interviews the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for enhanced barrier precautions for 5 (#24, #25, #26, #45, #255) of 5 (#24, #25, #26, #45, #255) residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: Review of the provider's undated Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy revealed the following in-part: Policy: Enhanced Barrier Precautions are indicated for residents with infections or colonization with a Center for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention -targeted Multi Drug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO) when contact precautions do not apply or for residents with wounds and/or indwelling medical devices without secretions/excretions that are unable to be covered/contained & are not known to be infected/colonized with any MDRO during high-contact resident care activities as these residents are at an increased risk of being infected. Definition: 1. Enhanced Barrier Precautions are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of MDROs in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of the facility's Infection Control Records, the facility failed to designate an individual/individuals as the Infection Preventionist, who is responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program. Findings: Review of the facility's Infection Control Records revealed there was no documented evidence that the facility had designated a staff member as the Infection Control Preventionist. On 06/25/2024 at 1:10 p.m., an interview with S1Administrator confirmed they do not currently have a staff member designated as the Infection Preventionist for the facility.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure residents had a pest free environment. The deficient practice affected 11 (#9, #11, #15, #18, #24, #27, #29, #33, #43, #47, and #49) of 11 sampled residents and had the potential to affect all 44 residents that resided in the facility. Findings: Review of the Pest Control Policy dated May 2008 revealed the following, in part: 1. This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Observation of the hall where residents #11, #27, #29, and #49 reside on 06/24/2024 at 11:00 a.m. with S1Administrator revealed flies in the hallway. Interview with S1Administrator at this time revealed the facility has a problem with flies. Observations on 06/25/2024 at 8:25 a.m. and 06/26/2024 at 1:40 p.m. of the hall where residents #11, #27, #29, and #49 reside revealed flies in the hallway. Observation on 06/24/2024 at 10:30 a.m. of resident #29's room revealed a urine smell in the room and multiple flies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to provide in-service training for nurse aides to ensure competency for 5 (S20CNA, S21CNA, S22CNA, S23CNA, and S24CNA) of 5 personnel records reviewed. The facility failed to ensure: 1.) S20CNA, S21CNA, S22CNA, and S23CNA received training in resident abuse, 2) S20CNA, S23CNA, and S24CNA received training in dementia management and 3) S21CNA and S24CNA who were employed greater than one year received 12 hours of inservice training yearly. Findings: Review of the personnel record for S20CNA revealed a hire date of 03/26/2024. Further review of the record revealed no documented evidence of dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training. Review of the personnel record for S21CNA revealed a hire date of 07/06/2021. Further review of the record revealed no documented evidence of 12 hours per year of in-service training to include resident abuse prevention training. Review of the personnel record for S22CNA revealed a hire date of 07/28/2023. Further review of the record revealed no documented evidence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to complete and transmit a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days after the resident was discharged from the facility for 3 (#10, #31 and #40) of 3 residents reviewed for assessments. Findings: Review of the medical record for resident #10 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 03/24/2024. Review of the medical record for resident #31 revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 03/01/2024. Review of the medical record for resident #40 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 01/13/2024. On 06/25/2024 at 2:45 p.m., interview with S5Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator confirmed the discharge MDS assessments were not performed and transmitted in a timely manner for residents #10, #31 and #40.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who received respiratory care are provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 (#20 & #34) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure: 1.) resident #20 was administered oxygen via nasal cannula per the physician orders and 2.) resident #34's nebulizer mask and tubing was stored in a plastic bag when not in use. Findings: Review of the record for resident #20 revealed an admit date of 11/27/2023 with the following diagnoses: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation and vascular dementia. Review of the June 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for resident #20 revealed an order for continuous oxygen (O2) therapy at the following rate: oxygen at 2 liters/minute continuous by nasal cannula. Review of the undated policy for oxygen therapy revealed in part that oxygen is administered to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0729 — isolatedVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure the State Adverse Actions Website checks were completed for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) initially upon hire and monthly thereafter for 5 (S20CNA, S21CNA, S22CNA, S23CNA and S24CNA), and the facility also failed to ensure the CNA registry was verified upon hire for 1 (S20CNA) for 5 (S20CNA, S21CNA, S22CNA, S23CNA, and S24CNA) personnel files reviewed. Findings: Review of S20CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 03/26/2024. Further review of S20CNA's personnel file revealed there was no documented evidence of a State Adverse Actions check for S20CNA upon hire or monthly thereafter. There was no documented evidence of the CNA registry check obtained upon hire for S20CNA. Review of S21CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 07/02/2021. Further review of S21CNA's personnel file revealed there was no documented evidence of a State Adverse Actions check for S21CNA upon hire or monthly thereafter. Review of S22CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 07/28/2023. Further review of S22CNA's personnel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (#31) of 1 (#31) resident reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to notify the Registered Dietician regarding a resident's significant weight loss. Findings: Review of resident #31's medical record revealed diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, severe dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, and delusional disorder. Review of resident #31's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] Quarterly Minimum Data Set revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 0, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed she was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living with 1-2 person assistance. She was also totally dependent on staff with 1 person assistance for eating. Review of resident #31's Malnutrition Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was assessed to be at a high risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 2 (#14 and #17) of 6 (#10, 14, 17, 21, 22 and 31) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to obtain lab work for residents #14 and #17 as ordered by the physician. Findings: Resident #17 Review of the medical record for resident #17 revealed an admission date of 03/02/2020 with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, venous insufficiency, hypokalemia, heart disease, edema, magnesium deficiency, obesity, hyperlipidemia, and anxiety. Review of the physician orders dated 09/14/2021 revealed an order to obtain a Complete Blood Count (CBC) and chem 14 every 6 months in May and November. Review of the nurses notes dated 05/16/2023 revealed the nurse attempted to draw labs times two attempts and unable. The Nurse Practitioner was notified and an order was obtained to draw the labs on 05/18/2023. Review of the lab results or nurses noted revealed no documented evidence of the CBC or chem 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-26 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) record and interview the facility failed to have documented evidence of having QAA meeting as least quarterly for the year 2023. Findings: Review of the QAA binder revealed no documented evidence of the facility having a QAA meeting for the first quarter of 2023 to address facility issues. On 07/26/2023 at 11:45 a.m., interview with S3Corporate Nurse revealed the facility did not have documented evidence of QAA meetings done quarterly.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$37,884 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $37,884 — penalty dated 2025-07-28
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-26 for 6 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOODLE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 12/22/2022 |
| MUSHELL, SHLOMO | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 07/07/2025 |
| FARRAR, BRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/21/2025 |
| BSD ELM TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/07/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $504K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in LA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195423. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.