Tri-Community Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 48.7 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 59 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program. The facility failed to: 1. Analyze the cause of resident's repeat facility acquired infections; and2. Follow its system for identifying potential infections The facility's census was 45 residents.Findings: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program with a revision date of 04/28/2025 read in part, The facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program.to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections.1. The designated Infection Preventionist (IP) is responsible for oversight of the program.and surveillance.and investigations of exposures of infectious diseases.3. Surveillance: a. A system of surveillance is utilized for prevention, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents.b. The infection Preventionist serve as the leader…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of the facility's Resident Personal Funds policy, the facility failed to provide quarterly personal funds statements for 1 (#12) out of 1 (#12) resident investigated for personal funds.Findings:An interview was conducted on 03/23/2026 at 09:24 a.m. with Resident #12. Resident #12 stated he had not received a quarterly statement for several months. On 03/23/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled Resident Personal Funds with no date revealed in part, Accounting and Records .3. The individual financial record must be available to the resident through quarterly statements and upon request .An interview was conducted on 03/24/2026 at 12:45 p.m. with S10PFS. She stated that she was responsible for providing quarterly personal funds statements to the residents with a personal funds account. S10PFS stated had been out of the facility from January 2025 to September 2025 and confirmed that Resident #12 had not received quarterly statements during that time.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) was completed accurately for 2 (#32, #44) out of 25 sampled residents. Findings:Review of Resident #32's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was coded for taking anticoagulants. Review of Resident #32's physician's orders for March 2026 revealed there was no order noted for an anticoagulant (a drug that inhibit clotting factors in the blood to prevent stable blood clots). Review of Resident #44's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was coded for taking anticoagulants. Review of Resident 44's physician's orders for March 2026 revealed there was no order noted for an anticoagulant. On 03/24/2026 at 8:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4MDSIP and S5MDS. They both reviewed the resident's electronic clinical record. S4MDSIP stated the residents were on Plavix and that was the anticoagulant. S5MDS corrected her and stated that Plavix was an antiplatelet medication. Both then…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 (#13, #15, #35) of 4 residents reviewed for ADL care.Findings: Record review of the facility's policy with a revision date of 04/28/2025, titled, Nail Care read in part, Provide guidelines for the provision of care to a resident's nails for good grooming and health.3. Routine cleaning and inspection of nails will be provided during ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care on an ongoing basis.6. Procedure: c. gently clean underneath nails with orange stick. Resident #13 Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia, delusional disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus and anxiety. Her MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 02/03/2026 indicated her BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was 7, meaning her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to have a policy/process in place to ensure that collected specimens were sent to the lab for processing in a timely manner to prevent delay of care for 1 (Resident #11) of 25 sampled residents.Findings:Review of Resident #11's electronic record revealed she was admitted to the facility on absence epileptic syndrome, intractable without status epilepticus; major depressive disorder, recurrent; and iron deficiency anemia. Review of Section H of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that she was always incontinent of urine and bowel.Review of Resident #11 progress notes revealed the following entries:11/20/2025 at 5:24 p.m. by S9LPN revealed the resident was exhibiting signs and symptoms of confusion and S8MD was notified and a new order noted for UA (urinary analysis) and C&S (culture and sensitivity). 11/21/2025 at 5:09 a.m. by S7LPN revealed she attempted urine collection and the resident was incontinent of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals remained locked in stored compartments as evidenced by medication left unattended on top of a medication cart. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure for Medication Storage that was not dated revealed, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines 1. General Guidelines: a. All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) under proper temperature controls. c. During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the Medication storage area/cart.On 03/24/2026 at 11:08 a.m. during the medication pass, S9LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed leaving medication blister packets of Baclofen and Hydralazine on top of the medication cart that was in the hall next to Resident #26's room. S9LPN was then observed entering Resident #26's room to administer medications. The medication cart was not in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from financial exploitation for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. The facility's census was 49.Findings:On 08/05/2025, a review of the facility's undated policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, read in part: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.Review of Resident #1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed an admission date of 05/31/2023, with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side; alcohol use, unspecified with withdrawal with perpetual disturbance; and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #1's last quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed he had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 14, indicating his cognition was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit accurate payroll information for direct care staffing as required. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 51 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year 2024, Quarter 1 (October 1- December 31) revealed the following: -One star staffing rating, triggered. -Excessively low weekend staffing, this metric is suppressed for this facility and quarter. -Failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours/day, triggered. On 02/26/2025 at 9:22 AM, an interview was conducted with S1ADM (Administrator). She stated she reviewed her entries to PBJ for Quarter 1, and realized she had two licensed practical nurses coded as a regular staff member versus a licensed practical nurse that was providing direct care to the residents. S1ADM confirmed she did not submit accurate payroll information to PBJ.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to supervise and monitor assistive devices to prevent accidents. This occurred in 1 (#35) out of 1 (#35) residents who were investigated for Accidents out of 19 sampled residents. Findings: Record review of the facility policy titled Resident Alarms and dated 12/31/2024 read in part, Alarms are to be utilize in accordance with the resident's needs .to maintain highest .level of well-being .when movement is detected .The use of alarms does not eliminate the need for adequate supervision of the resident .Each resident shall be assessed for fall .and periodically thereafter as part of the comprehensive assessment process .When alarms are used .monitoring shall be provided .to .verify alarms are working properly. Review of Resident #35's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were in part, Bipolar, Major Depression, Seizures, Paralytic Syndrome, Anoxic brain damage, Cerebral Vascular Disease, and Hemiplegia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient services, treatment and care according to standards of professional practice for 1 (#48) of 4 (#16, #17, #32 and #48) residents that were reviewed for urinary catheter or UTI (urinary tract infection). The facility failed to ensure Resident #48's urinary catheter drainage bag was secured properly off of the floor. Findings: On 02/26/2025 a review of the facility's policy with a review date of 12/31/2024 titled Catheter Care read in part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder and retention of urine. Review of Resident #48's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 01/21/2025 revealed in Section…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $222K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA