The Ellington

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 32.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 108.6 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.81 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions and provide adequate supervision to ensure a cognitively impaired resident, who had a history of wandering did not elope for 1 (Resident #1) out of 3 sampled resident (Resident #1, #2, and #3). This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 08/23/2024 at 6:51 p.m. when Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident, was unsupervised and eloped from the facility. On 08/23/2024 beginning at 5:10 p.m., Resident #1 was observed by multiple staff members repeatedly attempting to open several doors throughout the facility before exiting the facility's front entrance door undetected by staff at 6:51 p.m. On 08/23/2024 at 7:03 p.m., the facility received a call from a citizen that observed the resident in a residential area approximately 300 feet away from the facility. Resident #1 was brought back to the facility by staff at 7:10 p.m. Resident #1 was transferred to another facility with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accidents hazards during a chair to bed transfer for 1 (#1) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #R1) sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for Resident #1 on 03/25/2024 at 5:37 p.m. when S5CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) transferred the resident from chair to bed without assistance of another person and without the use of a mechanical lifter as required by his plan of care. On 03/26/2024 at 10:30 a.m., S3ADONWC observed Resident #1's right lower leg as discolored and painful upon movement. X-ray of the resident's right lower leg, dated 03/26/2024, revealed a tibia (shin bone) fracture. On 03/29/2024 at 11:26 a.m., S9MD (Medical Doctor) observed swelling and discoloration to the resident's left lower leg and ordered an x-ray. X-ray of the resident's left lower leg, dated 03/29/2024, revealed a fracture of the distal tibial metaphysis (lower part of the shin bone). Resident #1 was on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify the state's Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of a discharge for 1 (#123) of 1 (#123) residents reviewed for discharge requirements out of a total sample of 41 residents.Findings:Review of Resident #123's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 06/12/2025, with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic atrial fibrillation. Further review of Resident #123's EMR revealed a discharge summary with a discharge date of 06/23/2025. Continued review of Resident #123's EMR revealed no evidence the State's Long-Term Care Ombudsman had been notified in writing of Resident #123's discharge from the facility on 06/23/2025.On 08/05/2025 at 4:22 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON (Director of Nursing). S1DON stated the Ombudsman had not been notified of the resident's discharge as this is something they do not do.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the status of 2 (Resident #5 and #55) of 41 sampled residents.Resident #5Review of Resident #5's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, major depressive disorder, shortness of breath, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. Review of Resident #5's current physician's orders revealed an order dated 03/08/2025 that read in part, Hydrochlorothiazide (diuretic) oral tablet 25 mg (milligrams) Give 25 by mouth one time a day.Review of Resident #5's MAR (medication administration record) for June 2025 revealed she had been administered Hydrochlorothiazide 25mg for the entire month as ordered.Review of Resident #5's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 06/19/2025 revealed in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement a person centered care plan by failing to ensure physician orders were followed for heel protectors for 1 (Resident #55) of 41 sampled residents. Review of Resident #55's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, anxiety disorder, unspecified and dermatitis.Review of Resident #55's current physician's orders revealed an order dated 01/09/2025 that read in part, Apply heel protectors every morning while patient is in bed every day shift.Review of Resident #55's care plan with a focus that read in part, Resident has potential for alteration in skin integrity related to impaired mobility and history of pressure ulcers. Heel protectors when in bed was listed as an intervention for this focus with a date initiated on 05/07/2025.On 08/05/2025 at 09:16…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for 1 (#80) of 2 (#9, #80) residents investigated for dialysis out of a sample of 41 residents. Finding: Record review revealed Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis not limited to end stage renal disease, hemodialysis, obstructive sleep apnea, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease. Record review of Resident #80 physician orders dated 02/01/2025 read in part, provide foley (urinary catheter) care every shift and change bag and tubing every month. Record output and the end of every shift. Start date of order read 01/02/2025and was discontinued on 02/02/2025. Record review of Resident #80's care plan read in part, C.N.A. (Certified Nursing Asistant) and LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) monitor intake and output for Resident #80. Start date was listed as 12/31/2024. On 08/06/2025 at 12:30 p.m., S7LPN confirmed during an interview that she does not monitor intake and output on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nursing services were provided to meet standards of quality as evidenced by failing to ensure nurses conducted a fall risk assessment after each time a resident had a fall, and accurately assessed a resident's fall risk status for 1 (#3) out of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) resident's investigated for falls. Findings: Review of the facility's Fall Assessment and Prevention policy (no date) revealed in part . Purpose: To ensure the safety of the resident residing in the facility. Procedure: 1. Resident will be assessed using the Fall Risk Assessment Form upon admission, re-admission, at the time of the MDS/Care Plan review, and prn (as needed) .4. If a resident has a fall the Fall Assessment Form should be completed. 5. Attempt should be made to determine the cause of the fall document findings. Review of Resident #3's records revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included in part, Age-related Osteoporosis without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents received all care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice as evidenced by nurses failing to assess the resident after receiving reports of bruising, swelling, and pain to the resident's right leg for 1 (#4) out of 4 (#1, #2 #3, #4) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #4's electronic clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Cerebrovascular Disease, Aphasia, and Displaced Oblique Fracture of Shaft of Right Femur (10/30/2024). Review of the resident's annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 08/06/2024 revealed the resident was coded 3 for being severely impaired for cognition. The resident was coded requiring extensive assistance with 2 plus person assist for bed mobility, and coded requiring total dependence with 2 plus person assist for transfers. Review of the resident's nurse's note dated 10/23/2024 at 9:48 a.m. revealed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's remained free from accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) investigated for falls. The facility failed to ensure: 1. night staff got resident out of bed during last rounds, and 2. the resident's wheel chair alarm was properly working. Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but not limited to Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety, Repeated Falls, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Unsteadiness on Feet. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 05/29/2024 revealed he had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 05, indicating he had severe cognitive impairment. Section GG Functional Abilities and Goals revealed he used a walker and required supervision for toilet transfer, sit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain and clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by failing to ensure clean bed linen was provided to 1 (#46) out of 2 (#24 and #46) residents investigated for homelike environment. Findings: On 06/26/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Bed Making - Unoccupied Bed with a last reviewed date of 04/29/2024 read in part . Purpose: To provide a clean and comfortable bed for the residents . Essential Points . Change any soiled or dirty linen . Review of Resident #46's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Lack of Coordination, and Spondylosis without Myelopathy. On 06/24/2024 at 12:15 p.m. an observation was made of Resident #46's room. Resident #46 was sitting in his wheelchair. The bed was observed not made and the resident's pillow case revealed a medium size yellow stain, and multiple areas of small light brown stains on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order and care plan for 1 (#95) of 40 sampled residents by failing to ensure the resident's TED (Thrombo-Embolic Deterrent) hoses were applied as ordered. Findings: Resident #95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Essential Primary Hypertension, and Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation. A review of quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 04/26/2024, revealed Resident #95 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, indicating her cognition was intact. A review of Resident #95's physician orders revealed an order written on 03/01/2024 to apply TED hose in the AM (morning) and remove at night. A review of Resident #95's June 2024 care plan revealed she had Hypertension r/t (related to) dx (diagnosis) of Essential Primary Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation with a goal to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was stored appropriately when not in use for 1 (Resident #97) out of 2 (Resident #83, Resident #97) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings: Review of Resident #97's electronic health record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Atrial Fibrillation, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery, and COVID-19. Review of Resident #97's June 2024 physician's orders revealed an order dated 04/08/2024 for O2 (oxygen) at 2L/MIN/NC (liters per minute per Nasal Cannula) PRN (as needed) to relieve hypoxia. Review of Resident #97's care plan read in part .Resident has oxygen therapy as needed for SOB (shortness of breath). Interventions included: Oxygen Settings: 02 at 2L per nasal cannula as needed. On 06/24/2024 at 12:04 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #97's room. An oxygen concentrator was observed near the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$29,007 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $20,313 — penalty dated 2024-09-04
• $8,694 — penalty dated 2024-04-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $36K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA