No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Progressive Care Center

2550 Kings Hwy, Shreveport, LA 71103 · Non profit - Corporation · 48 certified beds · (318) 212-8200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (318) 212-8200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2551 Greenwood Rd · (318) 635-9855 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2551 Greenwood Rd · (318) 631-2005 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2709 Midway St · (318) 631-1867 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2900 Hearne Ave · (318) 212-0220 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased53.3%17.8%15.4%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder5.4%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.1%2.1%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.5%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.3%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.1%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%5.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.5%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.4%22.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%3.1%1.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.1%76.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.8%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.8%14.8%12.0%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 120 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
24.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
2.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
1.32hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.92hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 24.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 2.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 100% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.5%CMS range 43.2–59.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 8.9–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge24.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge29.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge16.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified85.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting70.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization11.5%CMS range 8.0–15.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.93
RN hours/ resident / day
3.34
LPN hours/ resident / day
4.27
Aide hours/ resident / day
8.54
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.97
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 31.9 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 8.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.27 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 7.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 8.97 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.97 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-01)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-11 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to accurately identify each resident's fall risk status by failing to complete the Fall Risk Assessment for 3 (#1, #2, and #3) of 3 total sampled residents.Findings:Review of the facility's Fall Risk Assessment Policy and Procedure with a review date of 04/01/2026 revealed in part: Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide an environment that is free from accident hazards over which the facility has control, and provides supervision and assistive devices to each resident to prevent avoidable accidents. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The risk assessment will be completed by the nurse or designee upon admission, quarterly, or when a significant change is identified. 2. The risk assessment will contain the following components:a. Identify environmental hazards and individual risks, including the need for supervision.b. Evaluate and analyze hazards and risks. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure 1 (#69) of 1 resident reviewed for wound care received treatment.Findings: Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/20/2026 and diagnoses including status post BKA of right lower extremity and status post trans metatarsal [toe] amputation of left foot. Further review of Resident #69's medical record revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. During an interview on 03/31/2026 at 2:37 p.m. Resident #69 reported surgical dressings on right BKA surgical site and left toe surgical site were not changed for 5 days until 03/25/2026.Review of Resident #69's physician's orders revealed a start date of 03/25/2026 for:-Wound care, surgical: right below knee amputation site (20 staples) clean with wound cleanser, pat dry, wrap in rolled gauze and secure with ace wrapping daily until resolved;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program and ensure staff practices were consistent with current infection control principles and practices to prevent infection by:1) failing to ensure staff wash and/or sanitize their hands prior to and in between resident care and medication administration for 2 (#59, #74) of 6 residents observed for medication administration;2) failing to sanitize glucometer machine after use for 1(#59) of 1 resident observed for blood glucose monitoring.Findings: Review of facility policy (no name or date) received 03/31/2026, withPurpose: It is the policy of Progressive Care Center that PCC considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections.Procedure:6. In most situations, the preferred method of hand hygiene is with soap & water. If hands are not visibly soiled, use an alcohol-based hand rub containing 60-95% ethanol or isopropanol for all the following situations:d. Before preparing or handling medications;j. After removing gloves7. Hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 (#60) of 2 resident records reviewed for ADL care.Findings: Review of the facility's Care of Fingernails/Toenails policy revised 10/23/2025 revealed:Nail care includes needed cleaning and regular trimming. Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/08/2026 and diagnoses including lung cancer, gout, and atrial fibrillation. Further review of Resident #60's medical record revealed a BIMS score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. An observation on 03/30/2026 at 11:04 a.m. revealed Resident #60 had long fingernails past the fingertips on both hands with brown substance under fingernails. During an interview on 03/30/2026 at 11:04 a.m. Resident #60 reported feeling unhappy with long fingernails. Resident #60 further reported food gets stuck underneath nails and would like fingernails trimmed.An observation on 03/31/2026 at 8:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services consistent with professional standards of practice were implemented for 1 of 1 resident (# 19) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's dialysis access site was assessed and monitored every shift. Findings: Review of the facility's Monitor Dialysis Site policy dated 12/15/2023 revealed in part: I. The nurse will ensure that the dialysis access site (e.g. [exempli gratia for example] AV [Arteriovenous] shunt or graft) is checked every shift. The nurse will check for a bruit and palpating for a thrill . II. The site will also be monitored every shift for signs and symptoms of infection . Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admit date of 06/15/2017 with a re-admission on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but not limited to, end stage renal disease, chronic kidney disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #19's current physician's orders revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure, prior to installation and use of bed rails, residents were assessed for the risk of entrapment, a consent was obtained from the resident or resident's representative, and residents had a physician order and care plan for use of bed rails for 7 (#7, #26, #27, #28. #148, #149, #196) out of 7 (#7, #26, #27, #28. #148, #149, #196) residents reviewed for bed rails. Findings: Review of the facility's Proper use of Side Rails dated 08/28/2017 (approved on 09/14/2017) revealed in part: Purpose: It is the policy of _____ that _____ utilize these guidelines to ensure the safe use of side rails as resident mobility aids and to prohibit the use of side rails as restraints unless necessary to treat a resident's medical symptoms. Procedure: Physical restrains are defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 (#148) of 5 (#11, #32, #36, #148, #149) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to monitor Resident #148 for bleeding while receiving an anticoagulant and for behaviors and side effects while receiving an antidepressant. Findings: Review of Resident #148's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/18/2025 with diagnoses that included, in part, depression, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, heart failure unspecified, and presence of cardiac pacemaker. Review of Resident #148's physician orders revealed a 02/18/2025 order for Eliquis 2.5mg (milligram) tablet - give one tablet by mouth twice a day and 02/18/2025 order for Celexa 10mg tablet - give one tablet by mouth at bedtime. Review of February 2025 MAR (Medication Administration Record) failed to reveal monitoring for bleeding had been conducted with 8:00 a.m. dose of Eliquis on 02/21/2025, 02/22/2025, and 02/24/2025 and the 8:00 p.m. dose of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 2 (Resident #32 and #149) residents out of a total sample of 20 residents. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were in place for Resident #32 and Resident #149; 2. Staff donned with proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when performing high-contact resident care for Resident #149. Findings: Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy and Procedure dated 03/25/2024 revealed in part: Policy: It is the policy of ____________ to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO). Definitions: Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employ targeted gown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse by staff for 1 (#1) resident out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Policy (undated) revealed the following: It is the policy of the facility to ensure residents have the right to be free from abuse. It is the responsibility of the employees, facility consultants, attending physicians, family members, visitors, etc., to promptly report any incident or suspected incident of neglect or resident abuse, including injuries of unknown origin, and theft or misappropriation of resident property to facility management. Procedure: IV. Comprehensive policies and procedures have been developed to aid in preventing abuse, neglect or mistreatment of our residents. The facility's abuse prevention program at a minimum includes: G. The implementation of changes to prevent future occurrences of abuse. IX. To assist one in recognizing incidents of abuse, the following definitions of abuse are provided: B. Verbal abuse is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents who receive a whirlpool bath. Findings: Review on 05/06/2024 of facility's current undated policy titled Giving the Resident a Shower/Whirlpool Policy and Procedure revealed in part: Be sure that the bath area is at a comfortable temperature for the resident. Stay with the resident throughout the bath/whirlpool. Never leave the resident unattended in the tub or shower. Use the emergency call signal to summon assistance, if needed. Review of the facility's Incident Report with occurrence date of 04/12/2024 revealed in part, Resident #1 was left alone in the whirlpool room. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to: acquired absence of left leg below the knee, type 2 diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, and hypertensive heart disease. Review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered plan of care for 2 residents (#36, #5) out of 14 residents investigated for plan of care. The facility failed to: 1. Develop and implement a plan of care for Resident #36's indwelling catheter. 2. Implement administration of Resident #5's medication as ordered by the physician. Findings: 1. Resident #36 An observation on 02/05/2024 at 8:15 a.m. revealed Resident #36's indwelling catheter bag hanging on Resident #36's bed and draining dark amber urine in catheter bag. Review of Resident #36's nurses notes revealed on 02/05/2024 Resident #36's indwelling catheter was patent and draining dark amber urine. Review of Resident #36's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the following diagnoses in part: Heart failure, urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis of liver, chronic kidney disease stage 3. Review of Resident #36's physician orders failed to reveal an order for an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure an RN (Registered Nurse) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days a week, for 4 days within FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 4 2023 (July 1- September 30). Findings: Review of the facility's PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for FY Quarter 4 2023 (July 1- September 30) revealed there were no RN hours for four or more days within the quarter. Further review revealed no RN hours for the dates of 07/24/2023, 07/25/2023, 08/07/2023, and 08/08/2023. During an interview on 02/06/2024 at 1:10 p.m. S1 Administrator reported she was responsible for completing the PBJ staffing report. S1 Administrator reviewed the PBJ for FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 4 2023 (July 1- September 30) and reported during that time period the facility only had one RN. S1 Administrator confirmed there was not RN coverage for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 07/24/2023, 07/25/2023, 08/07/2023, and 08/08/2023 and there should have been.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure grievances or complaints were addressed and investigated. The facility failed to follow their policy by ensuring a resident can file a grievance or complaint without fear of threats or reprisal. The facility had a total census of 42 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Grievance/Complaint policy reveal in part the following: Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to assist its residents, or person on behalf of the resident, in filing grievances or complaints when such requests are made. The following procedure outlines the steps needed to accomplish this task. Procedure: Any resident, his or her representative, family member or appointed advocate, may file grievance or complaint concerning treatment, medical care, behavior of other residents, staff members, missing property, etc., without fear of threat or reprisal. Staff member will delegate the responsibility of the grievance and/or complaint investigation to the department staff member who is best able to carry out the investigation and report the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WILLIS KNIGHTON MEDICAL CENTER, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 07/01/2007
CRUMP, DEBRAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/28/2025
BLANCHARD, PIERREIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/1983
BRYSON, EUGENEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/27/2014
ELROD, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/1981
FARIS, DANIELLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2023
HUGHES, FRANKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/1996
LASSEIGNE, RAYMONDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/28/2021
PUGH, LAMARIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/14/2021
SALE, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/28/2014
SIMPKINS, ELAINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/02/2015
COBB, JASONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2023
CRAWFORD, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/09/2019
FIELDER, JERRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/28/2017
GAVIN, PEGGYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2018
OLDS, DEBORAHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/21/2023
WARD, MARY JANEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2024
NICHOLLS, TIMOTHYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/19/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-23.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 15%Other / private 30%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$533per resident / day
operating cost
$16,202per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$433per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195136. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next