Village Health Care at The Glen

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 185 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 100.1 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.19 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.91 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-03-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, surveillance video review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse and psychosocial harm by staff for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. The actual harm resulted for Resident #1, who was cognitively impaired, on 01/09/2026 at approximately 7:58 a.m. when S4 CNA was observed on surveillance video physically abusing Resident #1. S4 CNA was observed to forcibly lift Resident #1 from a sitting to standing position three times by gripping Resident #1's left upper arm while yelling at Resident #1 Get up! resulting in multiple areas of bright purple purpura (bruising) to posterior left upper arm. S4 CNA further picked up Resident #1 by her underarms and S4 CNA dropped Resident #1 in wheelchair at the time of transfer. Because this type of inappropriate, unwanted physical abuse and being yelled at would reasonably cause anyone to have psychosocial harm, it can be determined that the reasonable person in Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status by failing to ensure weights were obtained monthly for 2 (#2, #9) of 3 (#2, #3, #9) residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings:Review of undated Policy titled Weighing and Measuring the Resident revealed:PurposeThe purposes of this procedure are to determine the resident's weight and height, to provide a baseline and an ongoing record of the resident's body weight as an indicator of the nutritional status and medical condition of the resident, and to provide a baseline height in order to determine the ideal weight of the resident.Preparation1. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident.4. Weight is usually measured upon admission and monthly during the resident's stay. (Note: Weight is measured in pounds [16 ounces=1 pound]) .DocumentationThe following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record:1. The date and time the procedure was performed.3. The height and weight of the resident.6. If the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required respiratory care received the care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (#4) of 3 (#4, #61, #80) residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's oxygen tubing was changed weekly, nebulizer tubing was dated, and nebulizer mouthpiece was stored properly when not in use. Findings:Review of undated policy titled Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) - Prevention of Infection revealed:PurposeThe purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment, including ventilators, among residents and staff.Preparation1. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special circumstances or precautions related to the resident.Infection Control Considerations Related to Oxygen Administration .7. Change the oxygen cannulae and tubing every seven (7) days, or as needed.8. Keep the oxygen cannulae and tubing used prn (as needed) in a plastic bag when not in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident's medical records reflected the resident's advance directive wishes for 1 (#92) of 1 resident reviewed for advance directives. The facility failed to ensure resident #92's medical records were consistent with the resident's wishes. Findings:Review of resident #92's records revealed an admit date to this facility 05/05/2026.Review of resident #92's records revealed diagnoses that include unspecified fracture of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, unspecified pain, muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, and unspecified heart failure.Review of resident #92's Physician Orders revealed an order dated 05/05/2026 for a Full Code.Review of resident #92's Face Sheet revealed the Advance Directive section indicated Full Code.Review of resident #92's records with S7 LPN (license practical nurse) revealed resident #92 as a Full Code.Review of the resident #92's records on 06/24/2026 at 2:30 p.m. with S3 ADON (assistant director of nursing) revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the provider failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for each resident as evidenced by failing to implement care plan intervention for falls for 1 (#1) Resident out of 3 residents reviewed for falls.Findings: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/03/2025 to the facility. Further review of Resident #1's medical record revealed diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, other lack of coordination, Alzheimer's disease, and muscle weakness.Review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan revealed Resident #1 was a fall risk with approach dated 10/22/2025 fall mat to each side of bed when in bed.An observation on 03/09/2026 at 8:27 a.m. revealed Resident #1 was resting in bed with eyes closed. Further observation failed to reveal a fall mat in place to both sided of the bed.An observation on 03/09/2026 at 2:20 p.m. in Resident #1's room with S5 CNA failed to reveal fall mats in place in Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free of accident hazards by failing to ensure a resident's room floor maintained non-skid traction for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Findings: Review of the facility's Falls and Fall Risk, Managing policy dated March 2018 revealed in part: Policy Statement: Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling.Policy Interpretation and Implementation:DefinitionAccording to the MDS, a fall is defined as:Unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor or other lower level, but not as a result of an overwhelming external force (e.g., a resident pushes another resident). An episode where a resident lost his/her balance and would have fallen, if not for another person or if he or she had not caught…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience for 3 (#30, #52, and #78) of 5 (#9, #30, #41, #52, and #78) residents reviewed for restraints. The facility failed to ensure: 1) Consent was obtained for the use of a gerichair with lap tray for Resident #30; 2) The facility failed to have documented evidence of monitoring of resident condition when lap trays were in use for Resident #30 and Resident #78; 3) Resident care plans were developed with problems and approaches related to the use of a gerichair with lap tray for Resident #30 and Resident #78 and; 4) Quarterly restraint assessments were conducted for the use of bed and chair alarms for Resident #52. Findings: Review of the facility's Physical Restraints policy dated reviewed/revised July 2024 revealed in part: Policy and Purpose: The facility is committed to maintaining a restraint-free environment. Physical restraints will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving a psychotropic medication had a Gradual Dose Review (GDR) attempted for 1 (#30) of 5 (#4, #5, #30, #51, #77) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of Resident #30's medical records revealed an admit date of 12/21/2021 with the following diagnoses, including in part: Alzheimer's disease with late onset, wandering in diseases classified elsewhere, depression unspecified, unspecified dementia moderate with mood disturbance, MDD (major depressive disorder) recurrent in partial remission, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #30's Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 10/19/2023 for Trazadone 50mg (milligram) tablet by mouth at bedtime for MDD. Review of Resident #30's GDR dated 11/24/2024 failed to reveal Trazadone 50mg was reviewed for an attempted GDR and a rationale was provided for continuing psychoactive medication at current dose by the Physician/Nurse Practitioner. During an interview on 05/14/2025 at 2:15 p.m. S2 DON (Director of Nursing)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement resident's comprehensive person-centered care plans by: 1. The facility failed to develop a care plan with a focus and appropriate approaches on bed rails/side rails for 2 (#9, #41) of 5 (#9, #30, #41, #52, #78) residents reviewed for restraints. 2. The facility failed to implement 1 (#24) of 3 (#19, #24, #90) residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to ensure Resident #24 was weighed weekly as per the physician order. Findings: Resident #9 Review of Resident #9's May 2025 physician orders dated 09/17/2024 revealed 1/3 length assist rail up times one on left when in bed to facilitate bed mobility. Review of Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Sets) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview on Mental Status) of 12 out of 15 indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #9's care plan failed to reveal a care plan had been developed with a focus and appropriate approaches for use of bed rails/side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing for 1 (#6) of 2 (#6, #24) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to identify, assess, and treat pressure wounds for Resident #6. Findings: Review of Resident #6's medical records revealed an admit date of 10/02/2020 with the following diagnoses, including in part: moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle wasting and atrophy multiple sites, Alzheimer's disease unspecified, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder unspecified and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #6's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed problems and approaches for: at increased risk for pressure ulcer - investigate causes of injury/bruise/skin tear, treatment as ordered .has fragile skin with history of prone to bruising and/or skin tear - assess new areas for size and injury .Further review failed to reveal current wounds on right foot and right heel with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 1 (#72) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #72's nebulizer mask and tubing were labeled, dated and stored properly when not in use, and failed to develop a care plan for respiratory treatments with appropriate approaches. Findings: Review of Facility's Policy on Administering Medications through a small volume (handheld) nebulizer with a revision date October 2010 revealed: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to safely and aseptically administer aerosolized particles of medication into the resident's airway. Preparation: 2. Review the resident's care plan, current orders, and diagnoses to determine resident needs. Steps in Procedure: 29. when equipment is completely dry, store in a plastic bag with the resident's name and the date on it. 30. Change equipment and tubing every seven days, or according to facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,735 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,735 — penalty dated 2026-03-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $603K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA