Golden Age Of Welsh, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 95.4 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-07-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to resident who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 (#16) out of 5 (#15, #16, #22, #40, and #44) sampled residents receiving pain medication. The facility failed to: 1. provide pain medication upon complaints of pain nor offer non-pharmacologic interventions; and 2. follow up with the physician and/or pharmacy after the physician reported he was sending a pain medication order to the pharmacy. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for Resident #16 beginning on 07/14/2024 at 10:02 a.m. when the resident reported she was in pain was not provided any medication nor offered non-pharmacological interventions for pain relief. On 07/15/2024, S6LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) called S15DR to report the resident's pain and stated that he would send something…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy and procedure reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent cross contamination and the likelihood of foodborne illnesses;2. Store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety; and3. Wear an appropriate hair restraint. This had the potential to effect the 85 residents who ate meals prepared from the facility's kitchen in a census of 86 residents. Findings:Review of the facility's policy, Sanitization, with a last review date of 03/24/2025, revealed the following in part: Policy Statement: The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. 2. All utensils, counters, shelves and equipment shall be kept clean, maintained in good repair and shall be free from breaks, corrosions, open seams, cracks and chipped areas that may affect their use or proper cleaning. Seals, hinges and fasteners will be kept in good repair. Review of the facility's policy, Date Marking for Food Safety, with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure individual financial records were provided to the resident through quarterly statements for 1 (Resident #67) out of 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #67) residents investigated for personal funds.Findings:A review of facility's policy titled, Resident Personal Funds, with an implemented date of 01/28/2025, indicated the following: Accounting and Records, 3. The individual financial record must be available to the residents through quarterly statements.A review of Resident #67's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition.A review of Resident #67's admission Record under Contacts section revealed Resident #67's name, contact type: Responsible Party (RP), and relationship: self.On 07/30/2025 at 10:56 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #67. Resident #67 stated she did not receive quarterly statements for her personal funds account.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services that met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure medications were administered in the appropriate time frame for 1 (#22) resident out of a final sample of 44 residents. Findings:A review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration with a last review date of 02/28/2025, read in part: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. The policy also indicated general guidelines, Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time.A review of Resident #22's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, Major Depressive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Insomnia, Hyperlipidemia, and Essential (Primary) Hypertension.A review of Resident #22's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accurate administering of a medication for 1 (#17) out of 4 (#17, #38, #68, #71) residents observed during the administration of medications. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration with an implementation date of 02/28/2025 read in part: . 10.) Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed: a. right resident b. right drug c. right dosage d. right route e. right time f. right documentation. Review of Resident #17's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed an admission date of 08/31/2020 with diagnoses that included in part, Hypertensive Retinopathy Right Eye.Review of Resident #17's current Physician's Orders for July 2025 revealed an order for Prolensa Ophthalmic Solution (eye drop) instill 1 drop in the right eye one time a day for Hypertensive Retinopathy. On 07/29/2025 at 7:25 a.m., an observation was made of S8LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) during medication administration. S8LPN was observed administering Resident #17's Prolensa eye…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident rights by not acting promptly upon resident grievances received during monthly resident council meetings and failed to demonstrate the facility's response for such grievances. Findings: On 07/17/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Resident and Family Grievances with a last reviewed date of 01/2024 read in part, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 8. Grievances may be voiced in following forums: . d. complaint during resident or family council meetings . 10. Procedure: . d. The grievance official will take steps to resolve the grievance, and report information about the grievance, and those actions on the grievance form . e. The grievance official, or designee, will keep the resident appropriately appraised of progress towards resolution of the grievances . A review of the Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status by failing to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for medications received for 1 (#44) of 38 residents reviewed in the initial pool. Findings: Review of Resident #44's electronic health record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Morbid Obesity, Bipolar Disorder, and Spondylosis with Radiculopathy. A review of the Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/31/2023 for Resident #44 revealed, Section N: Medications received failed to include opioid use. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2024 revealed the resident received an opioid for the entire month. On 07/17/2024 at 10:00 a.m., a concurrent record review and interview was conducted with S14RN (Registered Nurse). S14RN reviewed Resident #44's May 2024 MAR and confirmed she received an opioid for the whole month of May 2024. S14RN then viewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 1 ( #10) of 4 (#10, #54, #63, #61) residents investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 38 residents. Findings: Resident #10 Review of Resident #10's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. Further review of Resident #10's records revealed no evidence that a new review or a Level II PASRR had been submitted to the appropriate state-designated authority with those psychiatric diagnoses identified on the request. On 07/16/2024 at 8:29 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3RDON. She reviewed Resident #10's Level I Pre-admission screening with completed date of 02/28/2023. S3RDON confirmed Section III #1 was answered with no diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan for 1 (#33) out of 38 final sampled residents by failing to update the care plan to reflect the resident's code status. Findings: On [DATE], a review of the facility's policy titled, Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives with a last reviewed date of 01/2024 read in part, Policy: It is policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refused and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment to formulate an advance directive . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 7. During the care planning process, the facility will identify, clarify, and review with the resident or legal representative whether they desire to make any changes related to any advance directives. 8. Decisions regarding advance directives and treatment will be periodically reviewed as part of the comprehensive care planning process . 9. Any decisions making regarding the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to properly store respiratory equipment for 2 (#18 and #75) out of 2 (#18 and #75) residents investigated for respiratory care. Findings: On 07/17/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration with a last reviewed date of 01/2024 read in part . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 8. Oxygen tubing is to be bagged at bedside when not is use . 10. Types of delivery systems included: . e. Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) Mask . g. Aerosol Generating Device . Resident #18 Review of Resident #18's health record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Heart Failure, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, and Respiratory Failure. Review of Resident #18's most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicating her cognition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection. The facility failed to ensure S8CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and S9CNA wore proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) while proving care for 1 (#33) out of 2 (#29 and #33) sampled residents reviewed for peg tube care. Findings: On 07/17/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a last reviewed date of 04/01/2024 read in part, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms. Definitions: Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-dry resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$43,368 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $43,368 — penalty dated 2024-07-17
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-09 for 22 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA