Guest House Nursing and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 161 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 105.3 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure each resident received the care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 (#1, #2) of 3 sampled residents. The facility failed to assess, monitor, and document edema in accordance with the physician's orders and/or the comprehensive plan of care.Findings: Resident #1Review of resident #1's records revealed diagnoses that include edema, permanent atrial fibrillation, chronic right heart failure, hypertension, restless legs syndrome, disorder of peripheral nervous system and diabetes.Review of resident #1's Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 04/17/2026 for Lasix oral tablet 20 mg (milligrams). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for edema.Review resident #1's Comprehensive Plan of Care revealed resident has diagnosis of chronic kidney disease Stage II- risk for excess fluid volume, decreased urine output, and sodium retention. Monitor for generalized edema.Review of resident #1's April 2026 MAR (medication administration record) failed to reveal documentation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 2 (#38, #100,) of 2 (#38, #100) sampled residents reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility failed to ensure that residents' wheelchairs were maintained in good repair.Findings:Resident #38 Review of Resident #38's record revealed an admit date of 01/04/2023 with diagnoses including chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, left knee primary osteoarthritis and chronic kidney disease. Further review of records revealed a quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #38 utilized a wheelchair for mobility and required moderate assistance with transferring.On 07/28/2025 at 9:53 a.m. and 07/29/2025 at 8:50 a.m., observations of Resident #38's wheelchair revealed the wheelchair arm padding to be cracked and torn.On 07/29/2025 at 9:50 a.m., an observation conducted with S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Resident #38's wheelchair armrest…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation of personal property for 1 (#11) of 1 resident reviewed for personal funds. Findings:Review of the facility's undated Abuse and Neglect Prohibition policy revealed the following in part:Fundamental Information:Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent.Review of Resident #11's record revealed an admission date of 02/27/2025 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic cough, unsheltered homelessness, seizures, personal history of transient ischemic attack, cerebral infarction without residual deficits, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, pulmonary fibrosis, chronic kidney disease, other mixed anxiety disorders, and major depressive disorder.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience for 1 (#16) of 1 residents reviewed for restraints. The facility failed to have documented evidence of releasing the lap tray every two hours for range of motion. Findings:Use of Restraint Policy dated April 2017Policy Interpretation and ImplementationPhysical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body.The definition of restraint is based on the functional status of the resident and not the device. If the resident cannot remove a device in the same manner in which staff applied it given the resident's physical condition, and this restricts his/her typical ability to change position or place, that device is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an allegation of misappropriation of property/exploitation for 1 (#7) of 1 resident reviewed for personal funds.Findings:Review of the facility's undated Abuse and Neglect Prohibition revealed the following in part:Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of property. Fundamental Information:Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent.Investigation:1. The facility will conduct an investigation of any alleged abuse/neglect or misappropriation of resident property in accordance with state law.Review of Resident #11's record revealed an admission date of 02/27/2025 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic cough, unsheltered homelessness, other seizures,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify the state-designated mental health disability authority promptly for a review when a resident with Mental Disorders or Intellectual Disorders experienced a change in mental or physical status for 1 (#7) of 2 (#7 and #8) residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR).Findings: Review of Resident #7's record revealed an admission date of 06/24/2025 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia mild with mood disturbance, bipolar disorder current episode depressed mild or moderate severity unspecified, panic disorder, insomnia due to other mental disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder acute, hypertension, tachycardia, hypothyroidism, personal history of other mental and behavioral disorders. Further review of the record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility from an inpatient psych facility.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (#89) of 2 (#63 & #89) sampled residents reviewed for mood/behavior. Findings: Review of the medical record for Resident #89 revealed an admission date of 10/21/2018 with diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, breast cancer, edema, transient ischemic attack, dementia, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively aware and able to make daily decisions. Further review revealed Resident #89 needed maximal assistance with all activities of daily living. Review of section I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was as free of accident hazards as is possible by failing to ensure an appropriate intervention was attempted for 1 (#71) of 8 (#2, #4, #9, #10, #18, #36, #71, #89) residents reviewed for accidents.Findings:Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 01/14/2025 with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, displaced fracture of middle phalanx of left middle finger, repeated falls, history of transient ischemic attack, and hypertension.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which indicated severe cognitive impairment with daily decision making. Resident #71 required substantial/maximal assistance with sit to lying, lying to sitting, and chair/bed-to-chair transfer. Additionally, the April MDS assessment documented the resident as always continent of bowel and bladder. Review of the in-service training…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (#61) of 1 (#61) residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure there was signage indicating oxygen in use was posted outside the entrance of Resident #61's room. Findings:Review of the facilities Oxygen Administration policy, revised date of October 2010, revealed in-part: Place an Oxygen in Use sign on the outside of the room entrance door.On 07/29/2025 at 07:52 a.m. an observation of Resident #61 revealed she was receiving oxygen at 4 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (NC). Further observation revealed there was no signage posted outside Resident #61's room indicating no smoking oxygen in use. Record review revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications by failing to monitor for any active bleeding or bruising for a resident who received an anticoagulant for 1 (#1) 3 (#1, #61, #71) reviewed for general concerns.Findings:Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 06/25/2025 with diagnoses that included acute on chronic congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary edema, atrial fibrillation and hypertension.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated that Resident #1 was cognitively intact with daily decision making. The MDS indicated that the resident received an anticoagulant which is a high risk medication.Review of the current plan of care documented the resident's risk for abnormal bleeding related to anticoagulant therapy. The plan of care also indicated that Resident #71 should be monitored…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA