Onyx Care of Winnfield
915 1St Street, Winnfield, LA 71483 · For profit - Partnership · 124 certified beds · (318) 628-3533 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.9% | 17.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 5.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 1.2% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.4% | 2.3% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 8.4% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.7% | 3.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.8% | 17.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.3% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 94.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 13.6% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.3% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 35.8% | 22.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.1% | 3.1% | 1.4% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 76.3% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.5% | 28.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 26.3% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.39 | 2.56 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.81 | 2.74 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.3%CMS range 8.9–20.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 3.7–14.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.21 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 72.3 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure the following:Resident room and living space were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner,Droplet precautions signage was posted for Resident #1,Shower rooms were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner,Proper staff training of chemicals used for cleaning and disinfection of environment,Proper staff training of handling soiled linen and waste,Necessary staff had access to chemicals used for cleaning and disinfection of environment, andImplement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident #76.This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The total resident census was 71.Findings:Record review of an undated facility policy on 01/14/2026 at 2:02 p.m. titled Droplet Precautions read in part. Contact Precautions are a transmission based…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of needs by failing to ensure a properly-fitting helmet was provided for 1 (Resident #25) of 42 sampled residents. Resident #25 Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admit date of 01/23/2025 with diagnoses that included: Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury, Schizoaffective Disorder and Hypertension Review of Resident #25's Review of Resident #25's Care plan with review date of 02/04/2026 read in part.Resident #25 is at risk for injuries/falls. Ensure a protective helmet is worn when out of bed. Encourage use due to poor memory. Review of Resident #25's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 10/13/2025 revealed a BIMS of 06, indicating severe cognitive impairment. An observation on 01/12/2026 at 10:08 a.m. Resident #25 is observed sitting up in a chair in his room without a helmet. Resident #25's helmet is observed in a bag at the foot of the bed. Resident #25 stated that he does not really wear it anymore. An observation 01/14/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:Review of facility policy titled, Notification of Change in a Resident's Status with a revision date of 11/2017 revealed in part. The attending physician/physician extender (Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant, or Clinical Nurse Specialist) and the resident representative will be notified of a change in the resident's condition, per standards of practice and Federal and/or State Regulations. Responsibility: All Nursing Personnel. Guideline for notification of physician/ responsible party (not all inclusive). d. Any accident or incident (per Federal and State regulation).Review of Resident #52's electronic health record revealed an admission date of 12/23/2024, with diagnoses that included, in part. Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, Bipolar Disorder, Current Episode Mixed severe with Psychotic features, Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder, Unspecified Dementia with other Behavioral Disturbance, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Review of Resident #52's Annual MDS with an ARD of 12/11/2025 revealed Resident #52 had a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the SNF ABN Form CMS-10055 (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage Form CMS-10055) was provided to the resident and/or the resident's responsible party prior to the discontinuation of Medicare Part A services for 1 (Resident #31) of 1 resident reviewed for Beneficiary Notification who required the notification.Review of Resident #31's SNF Beneficiary Notification Review revealed Resident #31 was discharged from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted. Further review revealed a SNF ABN Form CMS-10055 was not provided to the resident or their RP prior to discharge from the service.Interview with S9MDS on 01/14/2026 at 1:30 p.m. confirmed Resident #31 remained in the facility after being discharged from skilled services with benefit day remaining. S9MDS confirmed she did not send the SNF ABN Form CMS-10055 to Resident #31 or their RP, but should have.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of medical records for 3 (Resident #23, Resident #45, and Resident #66) of 42 sampled residents.Resident #23 On 01/12/2026 at 9:20 a.m., observation of the facility outside dumpster area with S10Dietary revealed 3 medication blister packs on the ground with patient labels still fully intact. 1 of the 3 blister packs observed had Resident #23's name present and was labeled as Divalproex 125 milligram (mg) capsule. Resident #45 On 01/12/2026 at 9:20 a.m., observation of the facility outside dumpster area with S10Dietary revealed 3 empty medication blister packs on the ground with patient labels still fully intact. 2 of the 3 medication blister packs observed had Resident #45's name present and labeled as medications Naltrexone 50mg Tablet and Amlodipine 10mg tablet. On 01/12/2026 at 09:22 a.m. S10 Dietary confirmed empty medication blister packs with Resident #23's and Resident #45's patient information present on them were lying outside the dumpster area and should not have been. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for 1 (#76) out of 3 residents sampled for environment. Observation of Resident #76's room on 01/12/2026 at 9:51 a.m. revealed the privacy curtain was visibly soiled with multiple black and brownish-orange stains.Observation of Resident #76's room on 01/12/2026 at 4:01 p.m. revealed the privacy curtain was visibly soiled with multiple black and brownish-orange stains.Interview with S15RN on 01/13/2026 at 9:12 a.m. revealed the facility did not have a general housekeeping policy.Observation of Resident #76's room on 01/13/2026 at 10:00 a.m. accompanied by S1ADM confirmed the privacy curtain was visibly soiled with multiple black and brownish-orange stains. S1ADM revealed she was unaware of the facility's policy regarding soiled privacy curtains.Interview with S6HK on 01/13/2026 at 10:30 a.m. revealed privacy curtains were removed if visibly soiled, and replaced with a clean privacy curtain.Interview with S15RN on 01/13/2026 at 11:46 a.m. revealed the facility did not have a policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out ADLS (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 2 ( #57 and #58) of 3 (#6, #57, and #58) residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure:Resident #57 was provided nail care and was shaved; and Resident #58 was provided a bath on scheduled bath days. Findings:Review of the facility's policy dated 10/2009 titled Fingernails/Toenails Care read in part.Policy: The purpose of this procedure is to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. 3. Nail care includes daily cleanings and regular trimming. Review of the facility's policy dated 08/2011 titled Shaving- Male and Female read in part.Policy: Residents will be free of facial hair- both male and female. If the resident is alert and oriented and request not to be shaved, this will be noted in the care plan. Resident #57 Review of Resident #57's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 2 (#9 and #76) of 3 (#9, #52, and #76) residents reviewed for nutrition by:Failure to implement registered dietitian's recommendations for Resident #9; and Failure to provide tube feeding as ordered for Resident #76. Findings:Resident #9 Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed and admit to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Schizoaffective Disorder, Unspecified Dementia, Bipolar Disorder, Paranoid Schizophrenia, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident #9's Annual MDS with an ARD of 12/17/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 99, which indicated the assessment could not be completed. Resident #9 requires set up assistance with eating. Review of Resident #9's Care plan with a review dated 12/15/2025 read in part.Resident #9 needs to maintain adequate nutrition and hydration. Monitor weights, assess and address any significant weight changes. Document and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 1 (Resident #76) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure:Oxygen was administered at the prescribed flow rate; andRespiratory equipment was appropriately labeled. Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Therapy revised 08/2014, revealed, in part.Oxygen therapy is to be provided under the direction of a written physician's order. Change tubing weekly. Date tube when changed (weekly).Review of Resident #76's EMR revealed an admission date of 08/21/2025 with diagnosis including COPD, Shortness of Breath, Diabetes, Dysphagia, Heart Failure, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis, and Hypotension of Hemodialysis.Review of Resident #76's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 11/27/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #76 required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, turning, position changes, and transfers.Review of Resident #76's Provider's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly in accordance with currently accepted professional principles by failing to ensure that expired medications were not available for use/administration to residents. Findings: Record Review of an undated facility policy on 01/14/2026 at 1:52 p.m. titled Medication Storage read in part. All drugs, treatments, and biologicals must be stored securely and following the manufactures labeled recommendations, or per facility policy. The following medications must be removed from stock and disposed of properly on a continuing basis: Outdated, Contaminated, recalled, deteriorated, unlabeled medications, or those with soiled or broken/cracked containers. Observation on 01/13/2026 at 11:31 a.m. of Room A medication storage room with S13LPN revealed the following:(3) E-kits (Emergency Medication Containers) were unlocked with expired medications within the kits. Record Review of the E-Kits directions for use read in part. Remove red plastic lock from front of box, remove needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly obtain and notify the NP (Nurse Practitioner) of ordered lab results for 1 (Resident #58) of 42 Sampled Residents. Findings:Record Review of an undated facility policy on 01/14/2026 at 2:22 p.m. titled Laboratory Tests read in part. Lab tests are completed as ordered by the physician. The licensed nurse, or designee, will indicate when lab results are returned to the facility on the lab scheduling/tracking form. The physician or physician extender will be promptly notified of abnormal results according to facility policy. Review of Resident #58's Electronic Health Record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #58 had diagnoses that included in part. Generalized Muscle Weakness, Personal History of Pulmonary Embolism, Unspecified Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction, and Dysphagia. Review of Resident #58's admission MDS with an ARD date of 01/28/2026 revealed in part . Resident# 58 had BIMS of 06 and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 68 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure:1. Food items in the refrigerators and freezers were labeled, dated, and stored in a sanitary manner; and 2. Dry Food items were labeled with an open date and stored in a sealed container.On 01/12/2026 at 8:55 a.m., observation of the kitchen walk-in refrigerator revealed 1 bag of green onions opened and undated, 1 bag of shredded lettuce opened and undated, and 1 Activia yogurt opened with yogurt present on the packaging. On 01/12/2026 at 08:55 a.m., S10Dietary confirmed 1 bag of green onion and 1 bag of shredded lettuce should have been sealed and labeled with an open date, but were not. S10Dietary confirmed that the 1 Activia yogurt should not have been present in the refrigerator, which was opened and should have been discarded, but was not. On 01/12/2026 at 9:03 a.m., the kitchen walk-in freezer was observed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were properly disposed of. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 71 residents at the facility.Review of facility undated policy titled Garbage and Rubbish Disposal read in part. Garbage and rubbish will be disposed of to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen does not encourage infest or rodents. All outside dumpsters will be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. Outdoor trash receptacles will be kept covered, and the surrounding area kept free of litter.On 01/12/2026 at 9:16 a.m., observation of the facility's outdoor dumpster area revealed a moderate amount of empty boxes outside of the dumpster area, a moderate amount of litter outside of the dumpster area, and the dumpster door was open.In an interview on 01/12/2026 at 9:16 a.m., S10Dietary confirmed that the facility dumpster area was unkempt, with a moderate amount of empty boxes and litter surrounding it, and that this should not have been. S10Dietary confirmed the dumpster door should have been closed, and it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #2) out of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents.Findings:Review of Resident #2's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed an initial admission date of 12/23/2024 and diagnoses that included in part, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar type, Type 2 Diabetes, Hypertensive Heart Disease without heart failure, Anxiety, History of falling, and Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with agitation. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 09/22/2025 indicated Resident #2 was dependent on staff for assistance with eating, mobility, transfers, and personal hygiene. Resident #2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 4, which indicates severe cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #2's Care Plan dated as initiated 09/19/2025 included but is not limited to, At risk for falls.resident to be up in dining room for all meals.On 12/01/2025 at 12:15 p.m., Resident #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge was documented in the resident's medical record for 2 (Resident #1, Resident #R1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #R1, and Resident #R2) residents reviewed for discharge. The facility failed to:1. Ensure documentation in the medical record included the basis for discharge for Resident #1 and Resident #R1;2. Ensure documentation in the medical record included that written discharge instructions were given to and discussed with the Resident/Responsible Party for Resident #1 and Resident #R1; and3. Ensure documentation in the medical record included discharge planning that addressed caregiver support and referrals to local contact agencies for Resident #1.Findings:On 09/03/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled Discharge Plan/Summary last revised 04/2025 revealed in part.6. If the resident is discharging to a private home, social work should meet with the person accepting responsibility for the resident. Referrals needed should be made to home health, DHS, or others based upon the needs of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a discharge summary that included the required information for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #R1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #R1, and Resident #R2) residents reviewed for discharge. The discharge summaries for Resident #1 and Resident #R1 failed to include:1. A recapitulation of the residents' stay that included diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology, and consultation results;2. A final summary of the residents' status at the time of the discharge; and3. Reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the residents' post-discharge medications (both prescribed and over-the-counter).Findings:On 09/03/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge Plan/Summary last revised 04/2025 revealed in part.12. The Discharge Summary form should be completed with care needs identified and documented as appropriate.14. Guidelines for completion of the Discharge Summary: Nursing: Identifies continuing nursing needs. Specifies level of nursing care needed. Verifies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents sampled with behavioral health diagnoses by failing to: 1. Develop and implement a person-centered plan of care that addressed Resident #1's history of Substance Use/Abuse; 2. Ensure concerns identified in the provider's progress notes regarding drug diversion were addressed; and 3. Perform monthly UDS as ordered. Findings: Review of the facility's policy entitled Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plans, revised 01/2025, revealed, in part .each resident will have a person-centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care. A resident-centered goal is to be developed for each problem. Staff approaches are to be developed for each problem. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/17/2025 with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the admission and Quarterly MDS assessments accurately reflected a resident's status for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy entitled MDS Assessment, revised 06/2023, revealed, in part .these assessments provide information on the resident's condition and facilitate development of an individualized plan of care. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/17/2025 with admission diagnoses which included, in part .Adverse Effect of Methamphetamines, Cannabis Abuse with Intoxication, Suicidal Ideations, History of Suicidal Behavior, PTSD, GAD, Bipolar Disorder, and MDD. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 04/22/2025 revealed, in part .a BIMS Score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #1 did not have PTSD. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #1's history of suicidal behaviors, suicidal ideations, and substance use/abuse were not listed. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS with ARD of 01/24/2025 revealed, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that met professional standards of quality care for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy entitled Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plans, revised 01/2025, revealed, in part .a baseline care plan is the initial plan of care to be used upon admission, until the comprehensive care plan is completed. The baseline care plan is to be developed within 48 hours. A resident-centered goal is to be developed for each problem. Staff approaches are to be developed for each problem. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/17/2025 with diagnoses including, in part .Adverse Effect of Methamphetamines, Cannabis Abuse with Intoxication, Suicidal Ideations, History of Suicidal Behavior, PTSD, GAD, Bipolar Disorder, and MDD. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 did not have a baseline care plan. Interview with S2DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy entitled Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plans, revised 01/2025, revealed, in part .each resident will have a person-centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care. A resident-centered goal is to be developed for each problem. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/17/2025 with diagnoses including, in part .Adverse Effect of Methamphetamines, Cannabis Abuse with Intoxication, Suicidal Ideations, History of Suicidal Behavior, PTSD, GAD, Bipolar Disorder, and MDD. Review of Resident #1's comprehensive care planned revealed Resident #1 was not care-planned for Suicidal Ideations, History of Suicidal Behavior, PTSD, or Substance Use/Abuse. Interview with S1ADM on 06/12/2025 at 12:50 p.m. confirmed Resident #1 was not care-planned for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mental health services as dictated by accepted standards of quality for a resident admitted with multiple mental health diagnoses for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 sampled residents. The facility failed to: 1. Provide a timely referral for mental health services, and 2. Ensure mental health services were provided on a continual basis. Findings: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/17/2025 with diagnoses including, in part .Adverse Effect of Methamphetamines, Cannabis Abuse with Intoxication, Suicidal Ideations, History of Suicidal Behavior, PTSD, GAD, Bipolar Disorder, and MDD. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS with ARD of 01/24/2025 revealed, in part .a BIMS Score 0f 15, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #1 was taking antipsychotic and antidepressant medications on a routine basis. Review of Resident #1's Urine Drug Screen dated 01/22/2025 at 5:00 p.m. revealed Resident #1 was positive for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's rights to be free from physical abuse, for 1 (#3) of 3 (#2, #3, and #5) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #3 from physical abuse by Resident #5. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's Investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy on 02/05/2025, titled Abuse Prevention, read in part . The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consults, volunteers, staff from other agencies, family members, legal guardian, or any other individual. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admit date of 01/05/2024, with diagnoses that included: Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar type, Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Depression, Glaucoma, Legal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines. The facility failed to follow the menu in regard to portion size to ensure the nutritional adequacy of the meal for all residents who received a regular diet prepared by the facility kitchen. Findings: Review of Production Sheet Main Menu S/S 2024 provided by the facility revealed Baked Chicken portion size was 3 oz. Observation of lunch preparation on 09/30/2024 at 11:40 a.m. revealed improper serving sizes for six residents. Plates were served to 5 residents on a regular diet with one small chicken leg and two small chicken legs served as a double portion for 1 resident. Interview with S3 Dietary Manager and S4 Regional Director of Nutritional Services on 09/30/2024 at 12:43 p.m. confirmed one chicken leg without the bone was only approximately 2 oz. and that residents should have been served two chicken legs to meet the 3 oz. portion size on the menu and that two small chicken legs were not considered a double portion.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with Professional standards for food safety. The facility failed to properly store dry food items in the kitchen as evidenced by one loaf of bread with mold present; two packages of hot dog buns that expired on 08/19/2024; one opened box of cornstarch that was undated and one used pad of butter in the refrigerator, unsealed and undated. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident who consumed meals served from the facility's kitchen. Findings: Kitchen observation of the dry food storage area with S3 Dietary Manager on 09/30/2024 at 09:04 a.m. revealed one loaf of bread with mold present; two packages of hot dog buns that expired on 08/19/2024 and one box of cornstarch opened and undated. Observation of the walk-in refrigerator with the S3 Dietary Manager revealed one used pad of butter, unsealed and undated.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 (#30) of 1 (#30) resident reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30 had a call light in reach in order to call for assistance. The total sample size was 23. Findings: Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admit date of 01/05/2024 with diagnoses that included: Legal Blindness, Major Depressive Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, Major Depressive disorder, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of Resident #30's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an ARD of 08/15/2024 revealed Resident #30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #30's Care Plan with review date of 04/25/2024 revealed in part . Sensory/Perception Altered: Vision related to legal blindness. Resident #30 is at risk for falls and injuries. Keep call light within reach while in room. Interview on 09/30/2024 at 10:50 a.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse, for 1 (#76) of 2 ( #68 and #76) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #76 was not physically abused by Resident #68. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention, on 10/02/2024, with a review date of 10/2022, revealed in part .The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, friends, visitors, or any other individual. Abuse defined: Willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse may be resident to resident, staff to resident, family to resident, or visitor to resident. Physical Abuse: This includes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an incident of abuse for 1 (#76) of 2 (Resident #68 and Resident #76) residents sampled for abuse in a total sample of 23. Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated 10/2022, and titled Abuse Prevention on 10/02/2024, read in part . Investigation: The facility will initiate at the time of any finding of potential abuse or neglect, an investigation to determine cause and effect, and provide protection to any alleged victims to prevent harm during the continuance of the investigation. Review of a facility's Incident Report documented by S1 Administrator, revealed on 08/11/2024 at 5:00 p.m., S9 CNA reported that while she was passing out snacks in the special care unit's common area, Resident #76 tapped Resident #68 on the shoulder. Resident #68 became frightened and made physical contact with Resident #76 by grabbing her hair. S9 CNA reported while on the way to separate the residents, Resident #76 fell onto the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range, by failing to implement appropriate interventions for weight loss for 1 (#56) of 2 (#32 & #56) residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident #56's meal intake was documented for each meal, as care planned, and 2. Provide one on one assistance to Resident #56 with all meals, as care planned. Findings: Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/31/2021 with diagnoses that included in part .Major Depressive Disorder, Unspecified Dementia, Cellulitis, and Hypertension. Review of Resident #56's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/19/2024 revealed a BIMS could not be completed because the resident was rarely or never understood. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #56 required supervision or touching assistance with eating and was independent with sit to stand and chair/bed to chair transfers. Review of Resident #56's Care Plan with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, & #3) sampled residents by failing to ensure she was free of facial hair. Findings: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/15/2024 with diagnoses that included in part .Pneumonia, Urinary Tract Infection, Major Depressive Disorder, Dementia, Down's Syndrome, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities. Review of Resident #2's MDS with an ARD of 05/07/2024 revealed a BIMS was not conducted the resident was rarely or never understood. Review of the MDS revealed the resident required set up or clean up assistance with eating, substantial or maximal assistance with toileting hygiene and showering or bathing self, and partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #2's current care plan revealed the resident was at risk for decline in ADLs with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement the plan of care to meet the needs of 2 (#1 & #2) of 3 (#1, #2, & #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to monitor and record food intake at each meal as directed in the residents' care plans. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/05/2024 with diagnoses that included in part .Unspecified Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, History of falling, Anxiety Disorder, and Insomnia. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/24/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 4 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 required supervision or touching assistance with eating. Review of Resident #1's current care plan revealed a potential for weight loss with a problem onset of 03/05/2024. Interventions in the care plan included in part .Dietician to evaluate and follow up as needed, determine food preferences, downgrade diet to mechanical soft with chopped meats, house supplement 8 ounces twice daily between meals, monitor food intake…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed an admit date of 07/07/2022 with diagnoses which included: Hypertension, Unspecified sequelae of other Cerebrovascular Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Insomnia. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/28/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #3 had impairments to both sides of his lower extremities, and was dependent with chair/bed to chair transfers and independent with wheeling a manual wheelchair. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan with a Target of 04/2024 revealed a problem of impaired mobility and at risk for decline in ADLs related to diagnoses of: CVA, Depression, and Bilateral AKAs. Interventions included: A self-release belt while up in wheelchair due to poor safety awareness due to bilateral AKAs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored under proper temperature controls for 2 (Hall A medication refrigerator and Hall B medication refrigerator) of 2 medication refrigerators. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage revealed in part . All drugs, treatments, and biologicals must be stored securely, and following the manufacturer's labeled recommendations. Review of the facility's procedure titled Medication Storage revealed in part . Medications requiring refrigeration must be stored between 36 degrees F and 46 degrees F in a refrigerator. A thermometer must be used for frequent monitoring. Medications that require storing in a cool place are to be refrigerated unless otherwise labeled. Review of the Hall B Medication Storage Refrigerator/ Equipment Temperature Log on 09/06/2023 at 11:50 a.m. with S4 LPN, revealed the refrigerator temperatures were not checked daily. Interview with S4 LPN revealed the medication refrigerator should be checked daily by the night shift nurses. S4 LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to transmit a MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment within 14 days of completion for 1 (Resident #80) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for resident assessments. Findings: Review of the clinical record for Resident #80, revealed an admission date of 09/06/2022, and diagnoses that included: Anxiety Disorder, Anemia, UTI, Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity with other Behavioral Disturbances, and Unspecified psychosis. Review of the facility's MDS transmission report revealed Resident #80's Quarterly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 06/15/2023, was not transmitted until 07/07/2023. Interview on 09/07/2023 at 9:47 a.m. with S2 DON confirmed Resident #80's MDS assessment was completed late on 07/07/2023. S2 DON confirmed the assessment should have been transmitted timely within 14 days after completed, and was not.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to have an appropriate person-centered care plan for Resident #61 by failing to have interventions care planned when Resident #61 refused ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care or refused to allow staff to change his bed linen. Total sample size was 20. Findings: Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed a date of 03/16/2023, with diagnoses which included: Major Depressive Disorder, Unspecified Dementia, Conversion Disorder with Seizure or Convulsions, and Acute Hepatitis C. Review of Resident #61's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/08/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 12 (indicating mildly impaired cognition). The MDS revealed Resident #61 required supervision with set-up help only for bed mobility, dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene; Resident #61 was coded as independent with transfers, and no ROM impairment to upper and lower extremities. Review of Resident #61's Care Plan with a review date of 05/22/2023 revealed he is at risk for decline in ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) related to Diagnoses of Chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of the results of a urine culture resulting in a delay of treatment for 1 (Resident #16) of 20 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Notification of a change in a resident's status read in part . Policy: The attending physician/physician extender and the resident representative will be notified of a change in a resident's condition, per standards of practice and Federal and/or State regulations. Procedure: 1. Guideline for notification of physician/responsible party: f. Abnormal lab findings. 2. Document in the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) notes: b. Physician/Physician extender notification. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part .Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Urinary Tract Infection. Review of Resident #16's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 07/06/2023 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the Facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly. Findings: Observation on 09/05/2023 at 9:05 a.m. of the outside kitchen area accompanied by S5 Dietary Manager revealed 1 large blue dumpster located within a fenced in area, and 1 large black open topped roll away dumpster located outside of the fenced in area. There were multiple trash cans, and bags of trash observed spilling over the trash cans. There was a large amount of trash and debris on the ground that littered the area. Interview with S5 Dietary Manager at time of observation revealed the blue compact dumpster within the fenced in area had been broken for several weeks, and the facility brought in the roll away dumpster on yesterday 09/04/2023. S5 Dietary Manager confirmed there was a large amount of uncontained trash and debris on the ground, and there should not have been.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that assured the accurate reconciliation of controlled medications to meet the needs of each Resident, by failing to ensure a physical inventory of controlled medications were conducted by two licensed clinicians at each shift change. Findings: Review of the Facility's policy and procedure on controlled medications read in part . (8). At each shift change, a physical inventory of controlled medications is conducted by two licensed clinicians. By signing the Controlled Substance Tracking Form each nurse is agreeing that the number of controlled medications units (tabs, patches, etc.), and the number of Controlled Substance Records (sign-out sheet) matches the number of medication units on the Controlled Drug Record for each medication order. Review of an Incident Report dated 07/14/2023 by S1 Administrator at approximately 8:00 a.m., read in part . S3 LPN reported to S2 DON that there was an issue with the narcotic count, specifically the Fentanyl patches. S3 LPN showed S2 DON two boxes of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-03 for 34 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $887K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in LA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195454. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.