Maplewood Center
6 Morrill Place, Amesbury, MA 01913 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (978) 388-3500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $226,445 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-08)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.6% | 16.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.1% | 5.1% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 20.5% | 15.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 25.4% | 15.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.2% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 57.7% | 94.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 40.8% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.7% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.3% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 16.7% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 9.2% | 25.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.7% | 11.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.18 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.19 | 1.50 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.2%CMS range 29.5–53.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 7.1–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 84.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.5%CMS range 5.2–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.17 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 78.3 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.06 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
67 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. For Resident #69 the facility failed to a. ensure that treatment provided to a stage 4 left heel pressure ulcer was implemented in accordance with the wound consultant, and b. failed to ensure treatment to a deep tissue injury to Resident #69's left heel was provided in accordance with the physician's orders. Resident #69 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses that include but not limited to paralytic gait, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #69's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/16/25 indicated Resident #69 scored a 4 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, indicating he/she as having severe cognitive impairment, requires partial/moderate assistance with self-care activities including bathing, toileting and dressing. Further, review of the MDS indicated Resident #69 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and had 1 stage 4 pressure ulcer (Stage 4: Full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free from abuse for one Resident (#41) out of a sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide an environment free from physical, sexual and mental abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Clinical Services, Subject: Abuse' with a revision date of March 2023 indicated the following: It is the policy of the facility that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect and misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. It is the philosophy of the facility to encourage an environment that recognizes the special qualities of our residents and provides them with a safe environment. Definitions: -Abuse-means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. -Willful means that the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for one Resident (#41) out of a sample of 24 residents. Specifically, 1. The Director of Nurses (DON) and Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) failed to notify the Administrator about allegations of physical, sexual and mental abuse, 2. Keep Resident #41 safe by suspending the staff member involved in the abuse allegations, 3. Failed to report and investigate the abuse allegations as required, and 4. Failed to report the allegations to the state agency (SA) and law enforcement. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Clinical Services, Subject: Abuse' with a revision date of March 2023 indicated the following: It is the policy of the facility that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect and misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. It is the philosophy of the facility to encourage an environment that recognizes the special qualities of our residents and provides…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one Resident (#41) out of a sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to report allegations of physical abuse, sexual abuse and mental abuse to the (SA) state agency. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Clinical Services, Subject: Abuse' with a revision date of March 2023 indicated the following: It is the policy of the facility that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect and misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. It is the philosophy of the facility to encourage an environment that recognizes the special qualities of our residents and provides them with a safe environment. Definitions: -Abuse-means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. -Willful means that the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse for one Resident (#41) out of a sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to investigate allegations of physical, sexual and mental abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Clinical Services, Subject: Abuse' with a revision date of March 2023 indicated the following: It is the policy of the facility that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect and misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. It is the philosophy of the facility to encourage an environment that recognizes the special qualities of our residents and provides them with a safe environment. Definitions: -Abuse-means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. -Willful means that the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and records reviewed, the facility failed to have sufficient qualified nursing staff available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain sufficient staffing according to the facility assessment and facility staffing requirements. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated and reviewed by the facility in May 2024, indicated the following staffing ratios for Nurses and Certified Nursing Aides (CNA's): -4 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) / Registered Nurses (RN) Full time days - weekdays and weekends. -4 LPN / RN Full time evening - weekdays and weekends. -2 LPN / RN Full time nights - weekdays and weekends. -8 CNA's Full time days - weekdays and weekends. -8 CNA's Full time evenings - weekdays and weekends. -4 CNA's Full time nights - weekdays and weekends. During the recertification survey the surveyors' observed concerns with showers not being provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff were trained and demonstrated the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide the level and types of care and services needed as outlined in the Facility Assessment. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure licensed nursing staff were trained and demonstrated competency to identify, assess, evaluate, intervene, and respond to change in condition of a wound and implement treatment recommendations, for 5 Residents (#24, #61, #30, #69, and #21), out of a total sample of 24 Residents. As a result of these failures, for Resident #24 the facility failed to implement recommendations from the Wound Consultant over a three-month period resulting in the deterioration of a pressure wound from a stage 2 pressure wound to an unstageable pressure wound. 2. Ensure that seven out of seven staff education records reviewed, had education and competencies and were completed and documented annually, per the Facility Assessment. Findings include: According to the Board of Registration in Nursing, 244 CMR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and records reviewed, the facility failed to utilize the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, as required placing all residents at risk for not having their clinical needs met either directly by the RN or indirectly by the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) or Certified Nurses Aides (CNA) that the RN was responsible for overseeing with provision of resident care. Specifically, the facility failed to provide the services of a RN for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week when no staffing waivers were in place for seven days for the period of 10/1/24 to 12/31/24. Findings include: 1. Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated Quarter 1: 2025 (October 1 - December 31), indicated the following: -One Star Staffing Rating Triggered = Star Staffing Rating Equals 1. -Excessively Low Weekend Staffing Triggered = Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low. -No RN Hours Triggered = Four or More Days Within the Quarter with no RN Hours. Review of the as worked nursing schedule provided by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and records reviewed, the facility failed to complete annual Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) performance reviews for 3 out of 3 eligible sampled CNA's. Findings include: During review of 3 CNA employee records, the Surveyor was unable to locate annual performance reviews for 3 out of 3 eligible CNA's. During an interview on 6/5/25 at 8:27 A.M., the Human Resource Director said the annual reviews were not completed and said she does not manage that process as the former Director of Nursing handled the reviews. During an interview on 6/5/25 at 1:49 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said annual reviews must be completed yearly and documented in the employee record. The DON said she has not conducted any performance reviews since starting in the facility in April 2025.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it provided appropriate administrative oversight in a manner that enabled the facility to use its resources effectively to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility administration failed to ensure orientation, education and training was provided to all staff to provide competent, safe, and effective resident care as well as ensuring the governance and leadership members sustain a sufficient Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program during transitions in leadership and staffing. Specifically, the facility administration failed to: 1. Ensure effective systems were in place for education, and training for licensed staff to ensure competent, safe, and effective resident care related to wound management, and communication with consulting providers; 2. Establish and maintain an IPCP (Infection Prevention Control Program) designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent development and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Facility Assessment review and staff interview, the facility failed to identify resources based on the resident population to determine the necessary care, support services, and educational resources (in-servicing) needed to care for residents. Specifically, the facility failed to address sufficient staffing, education resources and include a competency-based approach, including competencies necessary upon orientation and/or annually, to determine the knowledge and skills required among staff to ensure residents are able to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, functional, mental, and psychosocial well-being and meet current professional standards of practice. In addition, The facility failed to implement an infection control surveillance plan for identifying, tracking, monitoring and/or reporting of infections, communicable diseases and outbreaks among residents and staff and failed to have a qualified Infection Preventionist with completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident # 63 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE] failed to indicate a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score. A review of Resident #63's care plan initiated [DATE] indicated that Resident #63 makes his/her own health decisions. A review of Resident #63's [DATE] physician's orders indicated the following: -Incision right hip. Start date [DATE]. -Wound vacuum settings 125 mmhhg (milliliters of mercury), change Monday-Wednesday-Friday. Start date [DATE]. -Cefazolin Sodium injection solution, use 2 grams intravenously every 8 hours for surgical incision until [DATE]. Start date [DATE]. On [DATE] at 8:46 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #63 in bed. There was no Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) signage and a Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) cart prior to room entry. On [DATE] at 8:04 A.M., 9:25 A.M., and 2:15 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #63 in bed. There was no Enhanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program to promote and monitor the appropriate use of antibiotics. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, dated as revised December 2016 indicated the following: -Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facilities antibiotic stewardship program. -The purpose of our Antibiotics Stewardship Program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. -Orientation, training and education of staff will emphasize the importance of Antibiotic Stewardship and will include how appropriate use of antibiotics affects individual residents and the overall community. -Training and education will include emphasis on the relationship between antibiotic use and: a. Gastrointestinal disorders; b. Opportunistic infections (e.g., C.difficile, candida albicans, etc.). c. Medication interactions; and d. The evolution of drug resistant pathogens. During the survey period the surveyor requested infection control line…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and review of the Facility Assessment, the facility failed to designate one or more individuals as the infection preventionist who are responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control plan. Specifically, the facility failed to have a qualified infection preventionist with completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Infection Control Policy and Procedure, undated, indicated the following: -To help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection in the Facility and to ensure that the Facility: -Designates one or more individual(s) as the Infection Preventionist (IP) who are responsible for the facilities IPCP. Establishes Facility wide systems for the prevention, identification, investigation, and control of infections of residents, staff (which includes employees, consultants, contractors, volunteers, caregivers who provide care and services to residents on behalf of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. For Resident #60 the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the MDS related to documentation from the physician that a gradual dose reduction of administered antipsychotic medication was documented as clinically contraindicated. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to unspecified dementia, encephalopathy, and bipolar disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated a staff assessment of mental status indicated Resident #60 as having severe cognitive impairment, and he/she is dependent on staff for self-care including toileting, bathing and dressing. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] indicated under Section N, High-Risk Drug classes that Resident #60 is taking antipsychotic medication, the physician documented a GDR (gradual dose reduction) as clinically contraindicated. The physician documented the GDR as clinically contraindicated in a note dated 12/3/24. Review of the Nurse Practitioner note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 52 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2b. For Resident #9 the facility failed to ensure skin assessments were implemented in accordance with the medical plan of care. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in August 2012 and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, bipolar disorder, moderate protein malnutrition, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #9 scored a 7 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Stats exam which indicated he/she as having severe cognitive impairment, requires partial/moderate assistance for self-care activities including bathing and dressing. Further review of the MDS indicated Resident #9 is at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #9's medical record indicated a Norton Scale for Predicting Risk of Pressure Ulcers, dated 10/22/24 as high risk. Review of the physician's order dated 3/14/23 indicated: -Weekly skin assessment on TUESDAY 3-11 shift. Document on PCC (electronic medical record) under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in locked compartments on one nursing unit. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated as revised April 2007, indicated: The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. -Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes.) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. -Only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications shall have access to the medication room, including keys. On 6/4/25 at 9:14 A.M., the surveyor observed the medication storage room was unlocked and unattended on the first floor Unit 1. The surveyor was able to open the door and gain access into the medication storage room. There were no staff present in or around the medication storage room. Residents were observed walking around…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance Committee developed and implemented an effective Performance Improvement Plan (PIP), including a corrective action plan with effective monitoring for Pressure ulcers, infection control surveillance plan, adequate Nursing staffing, and annual wound competencies. Specifically, (i) the facility failed to develop and implement an action plan after Nursing staff failed to implement recommendations for treatment received from the wound consultant, resulting in the deterioration of a wound for one Resident, #24 (ii) develop and implement an action plan for infection control surveillance planning for identifying, tracking, monitoring, reporting infections, and communicable diseases (iii) failed to develop and implement and action plan ensuring there was sufficient and qualified staff at all times to provide Nursing and related services to meet the resident's needs safely in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being (iv) failed to develop and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to offer the COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease) vaccine to three out of a sample of five employees. Specifically, the facility failed to offer COVID-19 vaccinations during the new hire orientation. Findings include: Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE], indicated the following: -Infection prevention and control. COVID-19 Response - Follow all CDC and DPH Guidelines. A review of five employee health records indicated three out of the five employees had not been vaccinated for COVID-19. During an interview and record review on 6/5/25 at 8:32 A.M., the Human Resources Director said she will request copies of COVID-19 vaccination cards and notify the Director of Nurses if a staff member does not have one and said she does not keep track of vaccinations and does not know if staff have been offered the COVID-19 vaccination during their new hire orientation. During an interview on 6/25/25 at 8:55 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) said all immunizations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain records of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) trainings for continuing competency that included no less than 12 hours of mandatory trainings per year for each CNA employed by the facility for two out of five CNAs reviewed. Findings include: During an interview on 6/5/25 at 1:48 P.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) said all staff education is tracked by the Human Resource Director (HR) to ensure the education is completed. On 6/4/25 at 10:14 A.M., the survey team requested proof of 12 hours of CNA training time for five employees. Review of the education records, for CNA #2 failed to indicate education had been completed and documented as required. Review of the education records, for CNA #3 failed to indicate education had been completed and documented as required. During an interview on 6/5/25 at 8:39 A.M., the DON said she was unable to provide the surveyor with additional education records for CNA #2 or CNA #3. The DON said she would expect any education and training to be kept in the employee folders. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a refusal of a medication for one Resident (#55), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the physician of Resident #55's refusals of his/her ordered furosemide (a medication that removes fluid). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, dated as revised December 2012, indicated: Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. 18. If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall initial and circle the Medication Administration Record (MAR) space provided for that drug and dose. Review of the facility policy titled, Notification of Changes, dated August 2024, indicated notification to the resident's attending physician will be made with a need to alter treatment significantly or to commence a new form of treatment. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility in May 2025 with diagnoses including Chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission for one Resident #224 out of a sample of 24 residents. Specifically, (i) the facility failed to develop a substance use history base-line care plan, (ii) a suicide attempt history base-line care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Care Plans-Baseline' with a revision date December 2016 indicated the following: -A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. -The interdisciplinary team will review the health care practitioner's orders and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs including but not limited to: Social Services. -The baseline care plan will be used until the staff can conduct the comprehensive assessment and develop an interdisciplinary person-centered care plan. -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one Resident (#24) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a plan of care after Resident #24 developed pressure ulcers to his/her back. Findings include: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses that included fusion of spine, cervical region, protein calorie malnutrition and iron deficiency anemia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/26/25, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating that the Resident is cognitively intact. The MDS further indicated that the Resident has one stage 1 pressure ulcer, and one unstageable pressure ulcer; neither of which were present on admission. Review of the medical record indicated the following: -A wound consultant note, dated 2/24/25, that initially indicated that Resident #24 had two stage 2 pressure ulcers, one to the proximal and one to the distal lower back. -Wound consultant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services related to showers for one resident (#37), in a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility in May 2020 with diagnoses including diabetes and congestive Heart Failure. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15. During an interview on 6/3/25 at 7:57 A.M., Resident #39 said that he/she had not received a shower in about 12 weeks. Resident #39 said that he/she would like to have a shower. He/she said that it's not that he/she refuses, but that they aren't offering a shower to him/her. He/she said that it depends on who's working or how much staff they have. During an interview, on 6/4/25 at 8:05 A.M., Resident #39 said that he/she still had not received a shower. Resident #39 said that he/she would like to have a shower.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for one Resident (#55) out of sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to include a physician's order for the use of oxygen in the medical record. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration dated as revised October 2010, indicated to verify there is a physician's order for the administration of oxygen before applying. Further review indicated to review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility in May 2025 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Congestive Heart Failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #55's cognition is cognitively intact as evidenced by a scored 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were completed as required upon admission for two residents (#50 and #66) out of a total of 24 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Physician Services, dated April 2013, indicated: 1. The Resident's attending physician participates in the resident's assessments and care planning, monitoring changes in resident's medical status, providing consultation or treatment when called by the facility and overseeing a relevant plan of care for the resident. 1. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #14 was cognitively intact evidenced by a score of 14 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam. Review of Resident #50's physician and nurse practitioner visits since October 2024 indicated Resident #50 was seen by the nurse practitioner on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services for one Resident, (#68) out of a total of 24 sampled Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure ongoing psychotherapy/talk therapy was provided for Resident #68 and failed to develop and implement a care plan related to Resident #68's diagnosis of depression and anxiety. Findings include: Resident #68 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses including vascular dementia, hemiplegia, and anxiety disorder and depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #68 is moderately cognitively impaired evidenced by a score of 10 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam. During an interview on 6/4/25 at 8:07 A.M., Resident #68 said that he/she had not been offered any counseling or therapy services while residing in the facility and that he/she was very interested in talking to someone. Review of Resident #68's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#13), out of 5 applicable residents, out of a total sample of 24 residents, that monthly pharmacy medication regimen review recommendations were implemented in accordance with the physician/nurse practitioner response to the recommendations. Findings include: Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in September of 2020 and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies, unspecified dementia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #13 scored a 9 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating he/she as having moderately impaired cognition and requires partial/moderate assistance for self-care activities. Review of Resident #13's medical record indicated the consulting pharmacist provided recommendations during the Monthly Medication Regimen Review on 2/24/25 and 4/10/25. The medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed, interviews and observation for one of two resident care units, the Facility failed to ensure the food/beverage items served to the residents were safe and at an appetizing temperature. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council Minutes indicated the following: - On 02/24/25, the residents were concerned about receiving the food being cold upon delivery by staff. - On 03/04/25, the residents continued to be concerned about the food being cold upon delivery by staff. - On 04/01/25, the residents said the kitchen was inconsistent with food temperatures, the food continued to be cold, and the Facility needed a plan to prevent the food from being cold upon delivery. During an interview on 05/08/25 at 4:10 P.M., President of Resident Council said residents continue to share with at meetings and with him/her that food meant to be hot is cold and the food was awful. The President said the Facility's food temperatures have been inconsistent when staff deliver the meal trays. Review of the Meal Delivery Times indicated the Breakfast carts are delivered on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, for two of two Nourishment Kitchenettes (Main 1 and Main 2), the Facility failed to ensure that food items prepared and served to residents were done safely, securely, were properly labeled and had not expired. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Nourishment Kitchen Procedure, undated, provided by the Facility indicated the following: - All beverages need to be labeled with the date they are brought in, and use-by date, which includes milk, ginger ale, cola and all pitchers of juice/ice-tea-iced coffee, applesauce and bread. - All food/beverages that are not labeled need to be thrown out by staff when they are stocking and cleaning. - The Dietary staff is responsible for ensuring the fridges and cabinets are clean and tidy, using sanitizer and a clean towel. Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Labeling Procedure, undated, provided by the Facility indicated the following: - Items placed in the refrigerators must have a name and a date.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled Residents (Resident #2), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate Medical Record, when on 04/09/25 there was no Nursing documentation related to his/her acute Hospital transfer or return to the Facility. Findings include: The Facility's Policy titled Resident Assessment Policy and Procedure, dated 2025, indicated the Facility shall maintain supporting documentation for all diagnoses in a residents medical record to verify the accuracy of the resident assessment. The Policy indicated supporting documentation shall include, but is not limited to the following; - Evaluations of the resident's physical, behavioral, mental, and psychosocial status. - Indications of distress. - Changes in Functional status and - Resident complaints, behaviors, and symptoms. Resident #2 was admitted to the Facility in 12/2024, diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease (a disorder of the Central Nervous System that affects movement), Atrial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, for three of three sampled Employee Personnel Files (Nurse #1, Nurse #4, and Certified Nurse Aide #3), the Facility failed to ensure they completed and followed abuse prohibition procedures as defined in their policy when Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry background checks were not conducted prior to hire. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy and Procedure titled Employee Background Checks, Reporting Requirements, and Prevention of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation of Residents, not dated, indicated the Facility shall be thorough in its investigations of the histories of prospective staff. The Policy indicated the Facility shall check the state nurse aide registry. The Policy indicated the Facility shall screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect, and exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property in order to prohibit abuse. neglect, and exploitation of resident property which includes checking registries. Review of Nurse #1's Personnel File indicated she was hired on 12/18/24. Further review of the file…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff implemented standards of practice by failing to do the controlled substance count (a control measure to safeguard and maintain accurate dispensing and inventory of controlled substances), at the time of a change in shift, on one of two resident care units. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, not titled or dated, indicated the following: The facility complies with all laws, regulations and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled medications. Policy interpretation 1. Only authorized licensed nursing and or pharmacy personnel have access to controlled drugs maintained on premises. 8. Controlled substances are reconciled upon receipt, administration, disposition, and the end of each shift. 12. At the end of each shift: a. Controlled medications are counted at the end of each shift. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty determine the count together. b. Any discrepancies in the controlled substance count are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, menu review and interview the facility failed to ensure meals provided to residents on two of two resident care units for two of two meals tested, were palatable, attractive and at appetizing temperatures. Findings include: During the resident group meeting conducted with the surveyor on 6/10/24 at 2:07 P.M., the residents said the food is an on-going issue. Residents said: It is not good and I would not feed it to my dog. We don't know what we are eating many times. I think we had chili over cabbage. Hot food items are not hot. Coffee is never hot. There are no condiments for food. The residents said this has been brought up to staff and they are aware. Eight of ten residents actively participating in the meeting said hot food is not served hot. During the initial screening process on 6/10/24 starting at 7:30 A.M. 10 out of 27 residents said that the food was not good and the temperatures of the food were either to cold or to warm. Review of the menu posted on the second floor on 6/11/24 indicated the following: *Tuna Noodle Casserole *Lettuce and tomato salad…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-13 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their Quality Assurance Performance Improvement plan during a transition of leadership to ensure practices to support quality of care were implemented. Specifically, the facility failed to identify, and develop a plan for services provided by Registered Nurses and failed to identify and develop a plan to ensure the Director of Nursing was not working as a charge nurse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI), not dated indicated the following: The QAPI plan had been developed to allow our facility to achieve its mission: to provide better care, compassion and solutions to the communities we serve. The facility will effectively identify, collect and use data and information from all departments and the facility assessment. Our facility will conduct Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) that are designated to take systemic approach to revise and improve care or services in areas that we identify as needing attention. We will conduct PIPs that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections within the facility. Specifically the facility failed to 1. track and trend infections in the facility and 2. failed to ensure a water management program was implemented to minimize the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in building water systems by having a documented water management program. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Infections - Clinical Protocol, not dated, failed to indicate a process for the monitoring and trending of infections in the building. During an interview on 6/12/24 at 2:25 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said that she was responsible the implementation and monitoring of the infection control monitoring program. The DON then said that she did not complete the monitoring, tracking and trending of infections for the months of March 2024, April 2024 and May 2024. She then said that she could not find a policy for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement their Antibiotic Stewardship Program to promote and monitor the appropriate use of antibiotics. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship - Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes, not dated, indicated the following: Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility-wide antibiotic stewardship. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. As part of the facility antibiotic stewardship program, all clinical infections treated with antibiotics will undergo review by the infection Preventionist, or designee. 2. The IP, (infection Preventionist) or designee, will review antibiotic utilization as part of the antibiotic stewardship program and identify specific situations that are not consistent with the appropriate use of antibiotics. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain professional standards of nursing practice for four Residents, (#63, #69, #27 and #54) out of a sample of 24 residents. Specifically: For Residents #63, Resident #69 and Resident #27, the records failed to indicate that medications were administered as ordered. For Resident #54, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to re-evaluate a temporarily invoked health care proxy. Findings include: 1. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, complications with kidney transplant, anemia, major depressive disorder, and delusional disorders. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] did not indicate a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score. Further review of the medical record indicated a behavioral therapy note dated 6/5/24 indicating Resident #63 is alert and oriented to time, place and person. A review of the nurse's progress notes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing levels were maintained to provide resident care on two of two units. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, with the date(s) of assessment or update as 1/3/2024 and date assessment reviewed with the QAA/QAPI (Quality Assurance and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) as 1/3/2024, indicated: Part 3 Facility Resources Needed to Provide Competent Support and Care for Our Resident Population Every Day and During Emergencies. 3.1 identify the type of staff members, other health care professionals, medical practitioners that are needed to provide support and care for residents. Further review of the facility assessment failed to indicate the staffing plan was filled out for Nurses' Aides and Licensed nurses providing direct care. Review of the facility's Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report for Quarter 2 January 1, 2024, through March 31, 2024, indicated the facility triggered as having excessively low weekend staffing. During an interview on 6/10/24 at 11:17 A.M. a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing included the services of a Registered Nurse for a minimum of eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required and failed to ensure the Director of Nursing did not act as a charge nurse. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's 'Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report 1705D', for Quarter 2 January 1, 2024, through March 31, 2024, indicated the facility triggered as a one-star staffing rating. Review of the document 'Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Quality, Safety and Oversight Group Ref: QSO-18-17-NH DATE: April 06, 2018' indicated the following: Requirement for registered nurse (RN) staffing - We are reminding nursing homes of the importance of RN staffing and the requirement to have an RN onsite 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. Nursing homes reporting 7 or more days in a quarter with no RN hours will receive a one-star rating in the staffing domain, which will drop their overall (composite) star rating by one star for a quarter. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from the Monthly Medication Review conducted by the pharmacist were addressed and acknowledged by the physician in a timely manner for three Residents (#34, #59 and #46) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Documentation and Communication of Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations dated revised 7/2023 indicated that the consultant pharmacist works with the facility to establish a system whereby the consultant pharmacist observations and recommendations regarding resident's medication therapies are communicated to those with authority and/or responsibility to implement the recommendations, and are responded to in an appropriate and timely fashion. 1. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including diabetes, high blood pressure and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #34 scored a 13 out of 15 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident issues brought forth to staff during the Resident Council Meeting were responded to and a resolution provided. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances dated revised March 2021, included but was not limited to the following: The Facility will support each resident's right to voice grievances and to ensure after a grievance has been received, the Grievance Official (Administrator or designee) will collaboratively work with team members to resolve the issue and provide written grievance decisions to the resident and/or the residents family. Procedure: 9. The Resident Council is an additional forum within the facility for voicing complaints/grievances. Complaints/grievances received from the Council will be acted upon in accordance with this procedure. Review of the Resident Council Meeting Agenda dated 3/6/24 indicated the following as New Business; Resident comments/Concerns/Recommendations: Quality of Care issues: 1. No condiments on tray. 2. Pepper and ketchup with breakfast…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set Assessment for two Residents (#42 and #71) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #42 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including morbid obesity, heart disease and anemia. Review of the medical record indicated that Resident #42 sustained a significant weight loss of 10.63% between 12/2/23 and 1/1/24. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] (less than five months since the significant weight loss occurred) indicated that Resident #42 did not sustain a significant weight loss in the prior 6 months. During an interview on 6/11/24 at 10:49 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing said that she would expect the MDS to be accurate. During an interview on 6/12/24 at 10:50 A.M. the MDS Nurse said that she looks at the documented weights in the medical record to obtain the information she uses to document on the MDS. She then said that she made a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to develop care plans for one Resident (#27) out of a sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop care plans related to a history of suicidal ideations and a history of alcohol abuse. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Care Plans-Comprehensive' with a revision date of July 2023 indicated the following: -All individualized comprehensive care plans that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, emotional and psychological needs is developed for each resident. -Each resident's care plan is designed to: (a) Incorporate identified problem areas. (b) Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems. (c) Reflect treatment goals timetables and objectives in measurable outcomes. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses including depression. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure hearing services were provided for one Resident (#4) out of a total of 24 sampled Residents. Findings include: By end of survey the facility had not produced a policy for audiology consults, per surveyor request. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses including hearing loss, dementia and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #4 has moderate difficulty hearing, and the speaker has to raise their voice and speak distinctly to be heard. Review of the doctor's progress note dated 1/29/24, indicated that Resident #4 was seen on 1/29/24 secondary to the family's concern of decreased hearing. Further review indicated that the ear canal was clear and without obstruction. Further review indicated that Resident #4 was unable to pass the whisper test with hearing aides in place and that a request for an audiologist evaluation of the patient and hearing aides will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview for one Resident (#38), out of a total sample of 24 residents, the facility failed to ensure risk assessments and skin evaluations were implemented for the prevention for developing pressure ulcer/injuries. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pressure Injury Risk Assessment, not dated indicated; The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the structured assessment and identification of residents at risk of developing new pressure injuries or worsening of existing pressure injuries. General Guidelines: The Risk Assessment should be conducted as soon as possible after admission, but no later than eight hours after the admission is completed. Repeat the risk assessment weekly for the first four weeks, if there is a significant change in condition, or as often as required based on the resident's condition. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses that include chronic atrial fibrillation, hemiplegia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided appropriate care and services for one Resident (#40) with a Gastrostomy tube (G-tube: a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal incision for administration of nutrition, fluids, and medications), out of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff labeled the enteral formula bag and water flush bag with the Resident's name, the formula used, the administration rate, duration, and initials of the staff member hanging them. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump and undated, indicated that, on the formula label document initials, date and time formula was hung/administered, and initial that the label was checked against the order. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including dysphagia, encephalopathy and legal blindness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were re-evaluated after 14 days of use for two Residents (#34 and #46) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Findings include: By end of survey the facility had not produced a policy for the use of as needed antipsychotic drug use, per surveyor request. 1. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including diabetes, high blood pressure and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #34 scored a 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating intact cognition. Further review indicated that Resident exhibited verbal behaviors directed towards others 4 to 6 days a week and refused care one to two days a week. Review of the care plan dated 1/23/23, indicated a focus of; Resident #34 uses psychotropic medications related to behavior management. Further review indicated an intervention to discuss with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when two out of three nurses observed made 2 errors out of 30 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 6.67 %. Those errors impacted two Residents (#39 and #37), out of 5 residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, undated, indicated that medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders. 1. For Resident #39, Nurse #3 gave the wrong dose of an ordered medication. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with diagnoses including gastro-esophageal reflux disease, osteoarthritis and dementia. During medication pass on 6/11/24 at 7:49 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #3 give Resident #39 two tablets of Calcium Carbonate 750 mg (milligrams). Review of the doctors orders dated June 2024 indicated an order for Calcium Carbonate 500 mg give one tablet at 9:00 A.M. During an interview on On 6/11/24 at 9:45 A.M., Nurse #3 said that she gave the wrong dose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review and interview the facility failed to 1. ensure medications and biologicals were stored in a safe and secure manner in one of two medication carts, 2. failed to ensure medications were properly labeled in two of two medication carts observed, and 3. failed to ensure medication carts were locked when unattended. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications and not dated indicated that the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner. Further review indicated that medications are not to be stored on top of the medication cart and open medication carts are to be within view of the nurse at all times. 1. On 6/11/24 at 8:09 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #3 leave six cards of prescription medications on top of the medication cart, walk down the hall and enter a resident's room. The surveyor observed that Nurse #3 was not in eyesight of the medication cart for two minutes. During an interview on 6/11/24 at 8:09 A.M., Nurse #3 said that she should not have left the medication on top of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide dental services for one Resident (#71) out of a total of 24 residents. Findings include: By end of survey the facility had not produced a dental services policy per surveyor request. Resident #71 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including multiple fractures, cerebrovascular disease and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #71 scored a 10 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 6/10/24 at 7:40 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #71 to have teeth missing, broken and carious teeth. During an interview on 6/10/24 at 7:40 A.M., Resident #71 said that he/she had many issues with his/her teeth and needed them to be fixed. Review of the medical record failed to indicate that an oral assessment had been completed since admission. Further review failed to indicate that Resident #71…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to: 1. store food under sanitary conditions and 2. failed to prevent cross contamination evidenced by staff not performing hand hygiene before donning and doffing gloves. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Food Storage' with no revision date indicated the following: -Perishable food such as vegetables must be stored in the refrigerator immediately after receipt to assure nutritive value and quality. A review of the facility policy titled 'Hand hygiene' with no revision date indicated the following: -All staff shall use the hand hygiene techniques as set forth in the following procedure: (a) Before applying sterile gloves. (b)Always after removing gloves. 1. On 6/10/24 at 7:23 A.M., the surveyor observed two boxes of cabbages placed on top of the milk refrigerator. The cabbages appeared wilted, with yellow leaves, some of the cabbages appeared rotten, the leaves appeared decayed and slimy. The boxes had a receiving date of 5/29/24, there was no use by date on the boxes. On 6/11/24 at 11:23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-25 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete Comprehensive (Annual and Admission) Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments in a timely manner for 5 Residents (#65, #321, #2, #64, and #8) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy, titled Electronic Transmission of the MDS (Minimum Data Set), indicated the following: *MDS electronic submissions shall be conducted in accordance with current OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) regulations governing the transmission of such data. Review of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) regulations indicate that a comprehensive (Annual or Admission) Assessment should be completed within a year of the previous Comprehensive Assessment. 1. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including hemiplegia. Review of Resident #65's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments indicated the following: An Annual Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/17/23, was completed 4/6/2023, 20 days after the ARD and over a year after the admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-25 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments in a timely manner for 4 residents (#65, #20, #64, and #8) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy, titled Electronic Transmission of the MDS (Minimum Data Set), indicated the following: *MDS electronic submissions shall be conducted in accordance with current OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) regulations governing the transmission of such data. Review of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) regulations indicate that a Quarterly Assessment must be completed within 92 days of the previous Quarterly Assessment. 1. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including hemiplegia. Review of Resident #65's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments indicated the following: A Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/22/22, was completed 12/1/22, 70 days after the ARD and 156 days after the previous Quarterly Assessment. 2. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review an interview the facility failed to implement the plan of care for three Residents (#7, #21 and #23), failed to develop a dental care plan for one Resident (#23), and failed to develop a comprehensive trauma informed care plan for 2 Residents (#9 and #52) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans- Comprehensive and dated as revised 12/7/21, indicated that an individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, emotional and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Further review indicated that assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident's condition changes. 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in October 2019 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia and Schizoaffective disorder. Review of the care plan dated as revised 2/27/23, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on schedule review and interview, the Facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) provided services for 8 hours a day, 7 days a week at the facility, as required. Findings include: Review of the staffing schedule from 4/11/23 through 4/25/23 failed to indicate that a Registered Nurse (RN) was present in the facility for 4 of the 15 days reviewed. During an interview on 4/25/23 at 11:46 A.M., the Director of Nursing acknowledged that there was no Registered Nurse present on 4 of 15 days, when there should have been.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure 1. a dignified dining experience for one Resident (#57) and 2. a dignified existence for one Resident (#56) out of a total 27 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality of Life Dignity, dated 3/21, indicated each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. 1. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility in July 2020 and had diagnoses that included fronototemporal neurocognitive disorder and dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/2/23, indicated that he/she was assessed by staff to have severely impaired cognition. The MDS further indicated Resident #57 was dependent on staff for eating. During an observation on 4/23/23 at 8:05 A.M., Resident #57 was observed in bed. There was a staff person sitting on the bed beside him/her, feeding Resident #57 breakfast. During an observation on 4/23/23 at 12:20 P.M., Resident #57 was observed in bed. There was a staff person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#57) was assessed for the use of a restraint out of a total 27 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Use of Restraints, dated March 2017, indicated the following: * Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom(s) and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls. * Physical Restraints are defined as any manual methods or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to ones body. * Restraints shall only be used upon the written order of a physician and after obtaining consent from the resident and/or representative (sponsor). * Care plans for residents in restraints will reflect interventions that address not only the immediate medical symptom(s), but the underlying problems that may be causing the symptom(s). Care plans shall also include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one Resident (#23) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in April 2020 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, psychotic disorder with delusions and dementia. During an observation on 4/23/23 at 9:51 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #23 to have carious and missing teeth. Review of the facility document titled Dental Group, dated 7/29/22, indicated that resident #23 has only 8 remaining teeth and those teeth require extraction secondary to decay. Review of the MDS dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #23 did not have any broken or carious teeth. During an interview on 4/24/23 at 12:00 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said that the MDS should accurately reflect the condition of the residents teeth.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-25 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to notify the physician of increasing carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the blood (a potentially life threatening condition) for one Resident (#26) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes and heart disease. Review of the nurse's admission summary note dated 1/28/23, indicated that Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on oxygen (O2) at 1 liter/minute via nasal cannula. Review of the doctor's orders indicated an order dated 3/28/23, for O2 continuous to maintain a sat (a measure of O2 in the blood) greater than 90%. Review of the discontinued doctor's orders failed to indicate a discontinuation order for O2 on admission. Review of the facility document titled Laboratory: 2/15/2023 14:55 Basic Metabolic Panel/NT-ProBNP/Complete Blood Count (CBC) w/Auto Differential/PT/INR / CALL BACK RESULTS indicated that the CO2 (carbon dioxide level in the blood) was 38 mmol/L…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) for one Resident (#21) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including dementia, need for assistance with personal care and cancer. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #21 requires an extensive assist with grooming. Further review indicated that Resident #21 scored a 5 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, indicating Resident #21 is severely cognitively impaired. During an observation on 4/23/23 at 10:36 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #21's upper lip, chin and cheeks to have significant amounts of long dark hair. During an interview on 4/23/23 at 8:05 A.M., Resident #21 said that he/she does not like facial hair and wants it removed. During an observation on 4/23/23 at 12:49 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff provided care consistent with professional standards, related to replacing, dating oxygen tubing for two Residents (#26 and #18) and failed to ensure staff cleaned and maintained a Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) machine for 1 Resident (#36). Findings include: 1. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes and heart disease. During an observation on 4/23/23 at 7:51 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #26 receiving oxygen at 2 liters/minute via nasal cannula. The oxygen tubing was labeled and dated 3/19/23. Review of the doctor's orders failed to indicate an order to change the oxygen tubing. Review of the care plan, dated 3/6/23, indicated to change oxygen tubing per policy. Review of the policy titled Oxygen administration and dated revised 3/2021, failed to indicate how often oxygen tubing is to be changed. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide dental services to one Resident (#23) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in April 2020 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury and dementia. During an observation on 4/23/23 at 9:51 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #23 to have carious and missing teeth. During an interview on on 4/23/23 at 9:51 A.M., Resident #23 said that his/her teeth need to come out. Review of the dentist note dated 7/29/22, indicated that Resident #23 has multiple missing, broken and carious teeth. Review of the dentist note dated 2/13/23, indicated that Resident #23 has rampant tooth decay and needed to have all of teeth extracted and a set of full dentures fabricated. Review of the nurse's note dated 2/13/23, indicated that Resident #23 was seen that day by the dentist. Further review indicated that the dentist reported that Resident #23's teeth require extraction and would have to have procedure out of facility, but would fit him/her for dentures, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) (a form issued by SNFs to notify Medicare beneficiaries of potential financial liability for certain services) for 2 out of a sample of 3 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to issue SNF ABN notices after skilled services ended. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Beneficiary Notice Policy and Procedure' indicated the following: -The facility shall inform the beneficiary about potential non-coverage and the option to continue services with the beneficiary accepting financial liability for those services. A review of two Notices of Medicare Non-coverage issued for the two residents who remained in the facility after skilled services ended on 1/17/25 and 3/17/25, respectively failed to indicate that SNF ABN notices were issued. During an interview on 6/5/25 at 9:20 A.M., the Director of Nurses said the expectation for residents who remain in the facility after skilled services ending is to get a SNF ABN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post nursing staff data daily, at the start of each shift, as required. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure they consistently posted the staffing as required. Findings include: During the survey the surveyor was unable to locate the staffing posting that is required to be available for residents and visitors to view. On 6/4/25 at 8:20 A.M., the surveyor observed a blank single sheet of white paper in the clear plastic document holder, located on the wall near the receptionist desk. During an observation and interview on 6/4/25 at 8:21 A.M., the Receptionist said staffing information and schedules are posted down the hall near the employee time clock and not located at the receptionist desk. The Receptionist said Residents and families do not have access to this employee area. The Receptionist said staffing schedules and data is not kept at the entrance or front receptionist area and said the employee time clock is where the information is posted. On 6/5/25 at 7:24 A.M., and 10:22 A.M., the surveyor observed a blank…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-04-25 · tag F0582 — widespreadGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide 3 out of 3 residents, who had been taken off of their Medicare Part-A benefit, with the appropriate Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN). Findings include: The SNFABN provides information to residents/beneficiaries so they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. If the skilled nursing facility provides the beneficiary with SNFABN, the facility has met its obligation to inform the beneficiary of his or her potential liability for payment and related standard claim appeal rights. During review of 3 resident's records, who had been taken off of their Medicare Part-A benefit and either discharged or remained at the facility, it was found that all 3 residents were not provided with complete Advanced Beneficiary Notices to inform the Resident or their representative in writing of their potential financial liability for payment for the non-covered services prior to coming off of their benefit.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-04-25 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure up-to-date and daily staffing was posted and readily accessible to residents and visitors on 2 of 3 days of survey. Findings include: During an observation on 4/23/23 at 6:52 A.M., the surveyors entered the facility and observed the daily staffing posted at the front of building was dated 4/21/23. During an observation on 4/23/23 at 9:52 A.M., the daily staffing posted at the front of building was dated 4/21/23 and management had been in building for several hours. During an observation on 4/24/23 at 7:24 A.M., the daily staffing posted at the front of building was dated 4/21/23. During an interview with the Staffing Coordinator on 4/24/23 at 9:00 A.M., she said that she is responsible for posting the staffing at the front of the building Monday through Friday. She explained that on Friday she prints out the postings for Saturday through Monday and that the weekend receptionist is responsible to ensure they are posted Saturday and Sunday. The staffing coordinator said that the weekend receptionist is new and must have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$226,445 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $163,592 — penalty dated 2025-05-08
- $62,853 — penalty dated 2024-06-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/03/2025 |
| ISHAKIS, YOCHANAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 45% | since 01/03/2025 |
| LEVINE, YISROEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 55% | since 01/03/2025 |
| CELTIC BANK CORPORATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 09/03/2024 |
| ZENITH CARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/03/2025 |
| TAKESIAN, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/03/2025 |
| AWEH, NELSON | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/03/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225229. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.