No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Quabbin Valley Healthcare

821 Daniel Shays Highway, Athol, MA 01331 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 142 certified beds · (978) 895-0147 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (978) 895-0147 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)2 actual-harm citations$62,250 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $62,250 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-17)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
119 New Athol Rd Ste 6 · (978) 249-5789 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.7 mi
1640 S Main St · (978) 249-9132 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Hannaford0.7 mi
140 New Athol Rd · (978) 249-7955 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(978) 249-2496 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.3%16.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.0%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%15.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.0%15.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.5%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.5%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.3%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.3%77.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.3%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.0%11.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.031.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.421.501.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 145 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
37.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 37.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.1%CMS range 39.7–52.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.5%CMS range 10.1–17.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge37.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge31.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 4.9–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.54
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.49
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 125.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-12)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-17)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews, and observations, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), who resided on a secure unit, had a history of wandering on the evening shift, and staff said they needed to have their eyes on Resident #3 while he/she was ambulating on the unit, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided an adequate level of staff supervision in an effort to maintain his/her safety and prevent a fall resulting in an injury, when on 08/25/24, although Resident #3 was out of bed and ambulating in the hallway, he/she was not being supervised by unit staff, Resident #3 fell in the hallway, complained of pain, was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) and diagnosed with intertrochanteric (hip) fracture of the left femur, which required surgical intervention to repair. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Support, dated June 2022, indicated the following: -Definition: Tasks related to personal care such as personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviewed and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 who was severely cognitively impaired and required assistance from staff for mobility and Resident #2 who was cognitively intact and dependent on his/her call light to alert staff of his/her needs), the Facility failed to ensure they were free from abuse by a staff member when: A). On 03/28/24 at approximately 6:00 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, was witnessed by Visitor #1 as she forcefully transferred Resident #1 to his/her bed. CNA #1 was then witnessed by both Visitor #1 and Nurse #1, as she forcefully pushed Resident #1 down on his/her bed when he/she tried to get up. Resident #1 was visibly upset and trembling after the incident, was fearful during a skin assessment on the following day, and was found to have three new bruises and two reddened areas on his/her left hand and collarbone that were not present, prior to the incident. B). On 04/03/24 (exact times unknown) CNA #3, was witnessed by Nurse Aide #A as she removed the call light, more than once, away from and out of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and records reviewed for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2) who required dressing changes to a wound on his/her coccyx and per facility policy was to be placed on Infection Control precautions, the facility failed to ensure the required level of precautions were put in place and that nursing implemented and followed all necessary precautions during wound care dressing changes. Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, effective 01/2023, indicated the following:-Enhanced Barrier Precautions are a level of protection for staff, and visitors who may be in a direct contact with a resident who possibly or has MDRO (multi-drug-resistant organisms) on their body or medical device.-These residents include residents with a wound regardless of their MDRO status (this includes chronic and surgical wounds, does not apply to skin tears or small wounds that can be easily covered with a dressing)-Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) must be in place when delivering high-contact resident care activities such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose comprehensive care plan indicated he/she required assistance of two staff members for bed mobility/positioning, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed interventions in his/her care plan, when on 12/05/25, CNA #1 repositioned Resident #1 in bed without another staff member present to assist her, and he/she fell out of bed. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled, Plans of Care, dated as revised on 04/04/25, indicated all staff involved in the resident's care must be familiar with and follow the care plan. Review of the Report submitted by the Facility via the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS), dated 12/08/25, indicated that during morning care on 12/05/25, Resident #1 was sliding off an air mattress and could not be retrieved to midline of the bed, was lowered to the floor, and did not have any injuries.Review of the Facility's Internal Investigation Narrative indicated the following:-Resident #1 sustained a witnessed fall on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required the assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and positioning, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance to maintain his/her safety to prevent an incident/accident, when on 12/05/25, during the provision of care, CNA #1 provided care to Resident #1 without having another staff member present to assist her, and Resident #1 fell out of bed.Findings include:Review of the Facility policy titled Fall Prevention, dated as revised 09/04/25, indicated the following:-Preventative care planning for the resident at risk for falls should involve all relevant disciplines.-All team members should be aware of the risks and benefits of interventions chosen, and preventative interventions will be entered into the resident care plan and will be updated as indicated.-Ensure caregivers, resident and family are aware of care plan interventions to promote continuity of care.Review of the Report submitted by the Facility via the Health Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication pass error rate of less than five percent (%) for two Residents (#75 and #54), out of five applicable residents, out of 34 medication pass opportunities. The medication error rate was observed to be 5.88%. Specifically, 1. For Resident #75, the Resident was not encouraged to rinse his/her mouth and spit after the administration of an oral inhalation corticosteroid medication. 2. For Resident #54, the Resident was administered an oral medication that was dropped on the contaminated surface of the medication cart. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Pass Guideline, effective 6/1/2012, indicated the following: -Purpose: To assure the most complete and accurate implementation of physician's medication orders and to optimize drug therapy for each resident by providing for administration of drugs in an accurate, safe, timely and sanitary manner. -Use sanitary techniques to place medications into a souffle or medicine cup. -The nurse is responsible for reading and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified existence for two Residents (#2 and #64), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, 1) For Resident #2, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided before exposing the Resident's buttocks during a dressing change procedure, putting the Resident at risk of having their private parts viewed by others. 2) For Resident #64, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident was dressed in his/her clothing and not a hospital gown while in common spaces in the facility with other residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Privacy and Dignity, dated 9/4/24, indicated the following: -Care for residents in a manner that maintains dignity and individuality: >Dress in appropriate and desired clothing. -Examine and treat residents in a manner that maintains their privacy. >Use a closed door, drawn curtain, or both to shield the resident during all personal care and treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement abuse prevention policies and procedures relative to alleged incidents of potential abuse for two Residents (#16 and #66) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement their abuse policies and procedures, relative to prohibition, identification, and investigation, to determine whether abuse had occurred:a. For Resident #16, who was allegedly pushed and sworn at by Resident #66, and Nurse #9 as an agent of the facility did not report the incident as required for the investigation of all allegations.b. For Resident #66, who had a known history of aggressive behavior toward other residents, had an altercation with Resident #16 and allegedly pushed and swore at him/her, and Nurse #9 as an agent of the facility failed to report the incident and prevent any further incidents from occurring. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation: Prohibition, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality relative to medication management for two Residents (#75 and #54), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #75, encourage the Resident to rinse his/her mouth as required after the administration of an oral corticosteroid inhalation medication, placing the Resident at risk of developing fungal infection of the mouth and airways. 2. For Resident #54, ensure that the Resident was not administered medication that was dropped on the medication cart surface, putting the Resident at risk of being administered contaminated medications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Pass Guideline, effective 6/1/12, indicated the following: -Purpose: To assure the most complete and accurate implementation of physician's medication orders and to optimize drug therapy for each resident by providing for administration of drugs in an accurate, safe, timely and sanitary manner. -Use sanitary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent deterioration of a pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) for one Resident (#2) of two applicable residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care and services, out of a total sample of 23 residents.Specifically, for Resident #2, the facility failed to ensure that the dressing change for a Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer of the left and right buttocks was completed per Physician's orders, when collagen powder and Calcium Alginate AG were not administered as ordered, placing the Resident at risk for complications related to the pressure ulcers. Findings included:Review of the facility policy titled Clean Dressing Change, dated September 2024, indicated the following:-Apply dressing and secure as ordered. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards relative to an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine outside the body) for one Resident (#2), of two applicable residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter care and services, out of a total sample of 23 residents.Specifically, for Resident #2, the facility failed to obtain Physician's orders for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter placing the Resident at risk for urinary tract complications. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Indwelling Urinary Catheter: Policy, revised 9/1/24, indicated the following:-A physician's order must be obtained for insertion of an indwelling catheter. The order must include catheter size, balloon size and frequency of change. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services for respiratory equipment was maintained in accordance with professional standards of practice related to cleaning, storage, and infection control practices for one Resident (#86) out of a total sample of 23 residents.Specifically, for Resident #86, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #86's Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) machine and accessory equipment were appropriately maintained and:-the humidifier chamber was cleaned per manufacturer recommendations to prevent growth of microorganisms and mineralization, putting the Resident at risk of inhaling microorganisms when the BiPAP device was in use.-the BiPAP mask and tubing was stored in a clean equipment bag when not in use to prevent contamination of equipment and potential sinus and respiratory infections for the Resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Chapter: Pulmonary, Care and Handling of Respiratory Equipment, revised 9/24, indicated the following:-Equipment should be changed based on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for dialysis (process that filters waste, salt, and fluid from your blood when the kidneys are unable to work adequately) services, for one Resident (#6) out of one applicable dialysis resident, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #6, the facility failed to: -Accurately monitor daily fluid intakes as ordered by the Physician, when the Resident was dependent on Renal Dialysis, placing the Resident at risk for fluid status changes, difficulty breathing, edema (swelling caused by a buildup of fluids in the body's tissues) and dehydration (when the body uses or loses more fluid than it takes in). Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Care of Renal Dialysis Resident, dated 9/1/14, indicated the following: -Dietary management involves restriction or adjustment of protein, sodium, potassium, or fluid intake. Staff to provide education on risk vs benefits of not adhering to restrictions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored in a safe and secure manner for one Resident (#123) out of a total of 23 sample residents.Specifically, for Resident #123, the facility failed to ensure that:-two over-the-counter medications were secured and not left at the Resident's bedside and readily accessible to other residents on the unit.-a Physician's order was obtained for the use of two over-the-counter medications brought into the facility by the Resident's family.-an assessment was completed to ensure the Resident was capable of self-administering medications. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Medication Pass Guidelines, dated 6/1/2012, indicated:-Purpose: To assure the most complete and accurate implementation of physician's medication orders and to optimize drug therapy for each resident by providing for administration of drugs in an accurate, safe, timely and sanitary manner.-Residents are allowed to self-administer medications when specifically authorized by the attending physician and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards of practice for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 23 residents and on one unit ([NAME]) out of four total units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to:1a.for Resident #2, ensure that staff performed hand hygiene as required between glove changes while providing wound care to the Resident.-b. ensure that staff wore the indicated Personal Protective Equipment (PPE: items such as gown and gloves used to mitigate the spread of infection) when providing care for a Resident who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP: protective barrier gowns and gloves used as an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms [MDRO] during high contact resident care).2. ensure that staff disinfected the glucometer machine between residents while performing finger stick blood sugar checks, increasing the risk for the potential spread of infection from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide education on the benefits and risks of Pneumococcal Vaccination for one Resident (#15) of five applicable residents reviewed for vaccination, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide evidence that education was provided to the Resident #15's invoked Health Care Proxy (HCP) when the Resident was offered the Pneumococcal Vaccine and refused administration of the vaccine. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Immunization and Vaccines- residents, last revised February 2022, indicated but is not limited to the following:-Vaccine information statements and consent for pneumococcal and influenza will be part of the resident's admission packet. Consent for these vaccinations will be obtained from the resident or resident representative at the time of admission. -Orders for administration of pneumococcal and annual influenza vaccine will be obtained/ or written by the resident's MD/NP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0918 — isolated
    Provide a bathroom in or located near each resident’s room.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (#3 and #1), who required the use of a wheelchair for mobility, the facility failed to ensure each residents room was equipped with or located near toilet/commode that they can access quickly, both residents ability to quickly access their bathrooms were restricted because the bathroom door size was smaller than the wheelchair. Findings include: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility July 2024, and resided on the [NAME] Unit. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] indicated Resident #3 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a score of 14 out of 15 on his/her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Assessment (0-7 suggests severe cognitive impairment, 8-12 suggests moderately impaired cognition, and 12-15 suggest a resident is cognitively intact). Further review of the MDS indicated Resident #3 had lower extremity range of motion impairment on both sides, required partial/moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) whose behaviors included disrobing and unsafe rising, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was treated in a dignified respectful manner which included being free from the use of a physical restraint imposed for the purpose of staff, when on 07/04/24 during the overnight shift, Certified Nurse Aide #1 placed a sheet across Resident #1's waist and tied it in the back of his/her reclining chair, to prevent Resident #1 from disrobing, while she left to provide care to other residents. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Physical Restraint, dated as revised on 06/10/16, indicated the resident has a right to be free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms/conditions. The Policy defined a restraint as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-17 · tag F0773 — pattern
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain Physician's orders prior to obtaining laboratory testing for three Residents (#25, #103, and #112) out of a total sample of three residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -For Residents #25, #103, and #112, obtain a Physician's order for COVID-19 rapid testing prior to administering a COVID-19 Rapid Test (type of COVID-19 testing which provides rapid test results) for each of the Residents. Findings Include: 1. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility in May 2024. Review of the Nursing Progress Note dated 6/7/24, indicated that Resident #25 was administered a COVID-19 rapid test. Review of Resident #25's June 2024 Physician's orders indicated no documentation that Resident #25 had an order for COVID-19 rapid testing. 2. Resident #103 was admitted to the facility in October 2023. Review of the Nursing Progress Note dated 6/1/24, indicated Resident #103 was administered a COVID-19 rapid test. Review of Resident #103's June 2024 Physician's orders indicated no documentation that Resident #103 had an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-17 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the required transfer documentation was completed and that the transfer documentation communicated the appropriate information to the receiving health care institution for one Resident (#16), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16 was transferred to the emergency room with a form that included important information relative to the Resident's medical history and the reason for transfer, putting the Resident at risk for complications and adverse events upon transfer to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Transfer and Discharge Policies and Procedures, undated, indicated the following: -Should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital .the facility will implement the following procedures (in part): 4. Prepare a transfer form to send with the resident. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in August 2018 with diagnoses that included: Anxiety Disorder (mental health disorder characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#12 and #54) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: 1. -Resident #12 was administered the appropriate liter per minute (LPM - flow rate of supplemental Oxygen [O2] ) of Oxygen as ordered by the Physician. -Resident #12's oxygen equipment was appropriately maintained in a safe and functional manner. 2. Resident #54's nebulizer set/tubing (drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of a mist inhaled into the lungs) was changed weekly as ordered by the Physician. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Nasal Cannula, dated April 2022, indicated the following: -Verify physician orders -Set flow meter by Physician order Review of the facility policy title Transfilling or Portable Liquid Oxygen Units, dated April 2022, indicated the following: -Make sure the connectors are clean and cry [sic] in order to avoid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with professional standards and practices for one Resident (#54) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, for Resident #54 the facility staff inaccurately documented that a nebulizer (drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of a mist inhaled into the lungs) set/tubing was changed as ordered. Findings include: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). Review of the facility policy titled Equipment Change/Disinfection, dated 4/2022, included: .nebulizer compressors .Date equipment when changed or cleaned. On 6/11/24 at 9:25 A.M., the surveyor observed the nebulizer setup on the windowsill in the Resident's room, with the tubing hanging down and dated 5/27/24. Review of the Resident's June 2024 Physician's orders included: -Change all O2 (oxygen) tubing and neb (nebulizer)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control measures to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one Resident (#25) and implement procedures for prevention of infection of one Resident (#111), out of nine applicable residents that had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #25, implement COVID-19 protocol for the Resident on Transmission Based Precautions (infection control precautions taken to prevent the spread of disease), to ensure that COVID-19 testing was done immediately during an outbreak once it was identified Resident #25 had possible signs and symptoms of COVID-19. 2. For Resident #111, appropriately store the urinary drainage bag when not in use, placing Resident #111 at risk for contamination of the drainage bag and infection when the urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the Pneumococcal (any infection caused by bacteria called Streptococcus pneumoniae, or pneumococcus that can range from ear and sinus infections to pneumonia and blood stream infections) Vaccination was administered to two Residents (#16 and #23) for five applicable residents, out of a total sample of 25 residents, increasing the Resident's risk for facility acquired Pneumococcal infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. offer and administer the Pneumococcal Vaccine to Resident #16 when he/she became eligible. 2. ensure that staff offered and administered an updated Pneumococcal Vaccination to Resident #23 within the appropriate timeframe as indicated by CDC (Centers for Disease Control) guidelines. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Immunizations and Vaccines-Residents, revised February 2024, indicated the following: -It is the policy of the facility that all residents receive immunizations and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), who was dependent on staff for all aspects of personal care including bed mobility and transfers, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse Policy related to the need to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the Administrator and/or designee, when on 04/03/24, during the provision of morning care, Nurse Aide #A witnessed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #3 place Resident #2's call light out of his/her reach, and then tell Resident #2 that he/she was in a time-out however, Nurse Aide #A did not report the incident to the Director of Nurses (DON) until the end of his/her shift, at approximately 4:30 P.M. that day (approximately eight hours after witnessing the incidents). Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Policy and Procedure, with a revision date of 2024, indicated the Facility will maintain an environment free of abuse, neglect and exploitation. The Policy indicated the following definitions of: - Neglect: means failure of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), the Facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse, was reported to the Department of Public Health (DPH) within two hours, as required, per Federal Regulations and Facility Policy. When on 04/03/24 at approximately 4:30 P.M. the Director of Nurses (DON) became aware of an incident that occurred earlier that day on the 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. shift, where the call light was deliberately removed from Resident #2's reach by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #3 who told Resident #2 that he/she could not have it because he/she was in a time-out, however the incident was not reported by the facility to the DPH until the following day on 04/04/24 at 8:16 A.M., more than 16 hours after they became aware of the allegation. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Policy and Procedure, with a revision date of 2024, indicated the Facility will maintain an environment free of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The Policy indicated the following definitions of: - Neglect: means failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Physician's Orders included the administration of an as needed (PRN) antidepressant medication (Trazodone), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record when nursing failed to accurately transcribe the medication order in to Resident #1's Medication Administration Record, by adding parameters not included in the the telephone order, which resulted in the medication being discontinued and unavailable for PRN use. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, titled Verbal Orders, with an effective date of 04/2022, indicated the following: -Verbal Orders are those given by the authorized practitioner directly to a person authorized to receive and transcribe orders on his or her behalf. -The individual receiving the verbal order will read the order back to the practitioner to ensure that the information is clearly understood and correctly transcribed. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in July 2023, diagnoses included anxiety disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was cognitively intact, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse Policy when :1) on 11/08/23, Resident #1 reported to Nurse #2 that Nurse #1 had acted in a sexually inappropriate manner towards him/her, and although Nurse #2 became aware of the allegation on 11/08/23, she did not report the allegation to administration until the following day, and 2) a Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) check was not conducted on Nurse #1 (agency staff) prior to his date of employment at the Facility, in accordance with Facility Abuse Policy. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled Resident Rights Program and Abuse Program, dated as revised, February 2022, indicated the following: -Employees, volunteers, and contractors must report any knowledge of abuse to the Facility Administrator within two hours or sooner. -Screening of potential employees will include requesting information from previous and/or current employers and verifying information with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a resident environment free of accidental hazards relative to accessibility of microwave ovens on resident units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its staff kept three out of three microwaves in common areas on resident units locked after it was determined by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) that all microwaves on resident units were to be locked for resident safety. Findings include: Review of the electronic communication from the facility to all facility staff, dated 2/21/23, included: .You will notice locks have been placed on the microwaves. Please continue to assist residents with their warming needs and utilize the thermometers to test. On 3/27/23 at 9:03 A.M., the surveyor observed a microwave, equipped with a lock, on the counter in the [NAME]/[NAME] Unit nourishment kitchen. The nourishment kitchen was located in an open, common resident area and the microwave was not locked. During an interview on 3/27/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure its staff adhered to sanitary standards of practice during food distribution in the main kitchen and standards of practice for food storage in three out of three unit nourishment kitchens. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) dietary staff wore hair restraints to fully cover their hair and beard during meal service, 2) labeled and dated all resident food items, that outdated food items were not accessible for resident consumption and the nourishment kitchens were clean and free of dried food and debris on three out of three units. Findings include: 1) The facility failed to ensure its staff wore hair restraints during resident food service in the main kitchen. Review of the facility's policy for dietary personnel sanitary standards, untitled, revised February 2022, indicated that hair nets or caps were required to be worn at all times while on duty. On 3/27/23 at 7:28 A.M., the surveyor observed the breakfast tray line…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff completed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment to accurately reflect the status of one Resident (#88), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to accurately code Resident #88's risk for pressure ulcers (PUs-localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue, usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) and the presence of a Stage Three (full-thickness skin loss) PU on one MDS Assessment. Findings include: 1. For Resident #88, the facility failed to ensure its staff completed one MDS Assessment accurately to reflect the residents' risk for PU, and the presence of a PU when the Resident had, and was being treated for a Stage Three PU on his/her left heel during the observation period for the Assessment. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in December 2020 with diagnoses including Stage Three PU to left heel and Quadriplegia (paralysis of limbs and torso). Review of a Nursing Note, dated 1/26/23, included that Resident #88 had a Stage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff implemented the plan of care for two Residents (#88 and #232), out of a total sample of 26 total residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its staff: 1) provided Resident #88 with appropriate air mattress settings and positioning in bed, according to the Resident's care plan, Wound Physician recommendations, and Physician orders, increasing the Resident's risk for development of, and worsening of a Stage Three pressure ulcer (PU), and 2) obtained weekly weights, according to the Dietitian's recommendation and the Physician's order for Resident #232 after identified weight loss. Findings include: 1. For Resident #88, the facility failed to ensure its staff implemented the Resident's plan of care for proper air mattress settings and positioning while in bed, to offload his/her heels, when the Resident had been identified as being at risk for PU development, had a Stage Three PU on the left heel, and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided necessary treatments related to the care of pressure ulcers (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one Resident (#131) out of three closed records, and one Resident (#107) out of three applicable residents, in a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) for Resident #131, implement a Physician ordered treatment to a pressure ulcer, and 2) for Resident #107, obtain a Physician ordered treatment to a pressure ulcer following the removal of a wound vacuum (method of decreasing air pressure around a wound to assist with wound healing). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Skin Care Program and Protocols, dated June 2022, indicated the following: -Weekly assessments of all residents with pressure ulcers will be conducted through wound rounds. -Upon any indication of a pressure ulcer the designated nurse will notify the attending physician. Documentation of the date, time, name…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided appropriate care and services of an indwelling urinary catheter as required (a tube placed through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine), for one Resident (#120) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #120's indwelling catheter tubing was securely placed to prevent possible dislodgment and trauma. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Indwelling Urinary Catheter effective 7/2022 indicated the following: Practices During Maintenance of the Indwelling Catheter - Properly secure catheter to resident's thigh with a urological strap to prevent dislodgement/urethral trauma. Resident #120 was admitted to the facility in November 2022 with a diagnosis of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH - enlarged prostate gland). Review of the Resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated March 2023 indicated the following: Foley Catheter (FC- indwelling urinary catheter), size 16 fr (French) with 10ml…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for one Resident (#40), who required renal dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys stop working), out of one applicable sampled resident, in a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate communication with the dialysis facility for the Resident's dialysis appointments. Findings include: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - a medical condition where the kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #40 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a total possible score of 15. During an interview on 3/26/23 at 12:14 P.M., Resident #40 said that he/she went to dialysis on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-28 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided two Residents (#46 and #65), with Dementia diagnoses with appropriate treatment to maintain their highest practicable level of mental and psychosocial well-being, out of 26 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1) For Resident #46, provide appropriate interventions to assist with de-escalation when the Resident was disoriented, exit seeking, wandering, and disrobing during the overnight (11:00 P.M. through 7:00 A.M.) hours, and 2) For Resident #65, interact with the Resident who was awake and seated in a common resident area with five other residents, during an activity where staff interacted with all other residents in the area. Findings include: 1. Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with a diagnosis of unspecified Dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance. Review of the Resident's active Care Plan indicated the following: - The Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained an infection prevention and control program to prevent the transmission of a communicable disease when the facility was experiencing an outbreak of COVID -19 infections. Specifically, the facility staff failed to assess two Residents (#114 and #115), out of five applicable residents, in a total sample of 26 residents, every shift for signs and symptoms of COVID-19, on a nursing unit where outbreak testing was being conducted. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health Memorandum dated October 13, 2022 titled Update to Caring for Long-Term Care Residents During the COVID-19 Response indicated the following: - On unit(s) conducting outbreak testing, a long-term care facility should assess residents for symptoms of COVID- 19 during each shift. Review of the facility policy titled COVID-19 Prevention and Control last reviewed 11/12/2022 indicated the following: - On unit (s) conducting outbreak…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-08-12 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that discharge tracking Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed as required for three Residents (#25, #27, and #82) of four applicable residents, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Discharge MDS Assessments were completed when Residents #25, #27 and #82 were discharged from the facility to the community. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) version 3.0 Manual dated 10/1/24, reviewed at https://www.cms.gov/files/document/finalmds-30-rai-manual-v1191october2024.pdf Section 2.8 Skilled Facility Prospective Payment System Assessment Schedule indicated the following:-Discharge Assessment refers to an assessment required on resident discharge from the facility, or when a resident's Medicare Part A stay ends, but the resident remains in the facility . 1. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility in February 2025. Review of Resident #25's clinical record indicated he/she was discharged to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · B2025-08-12 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post required nurse staffing information daily that included the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: registered nurses, licensed practical nurses or licensed vocational nurses, and certified nurse aides. Specifically, the facility failed to post the required nurse staffing information and the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff on 8/6/25, 8/7/25, and 8/8/25. Findings include: On 8/6/25 at 3:48 P.M., the surveyor observed a staff posting form in the lobby dated 8/6/25 that included the census and the number of staff broken down by job type per shift. The posted nurse staffing information failed to indicate the actual hours worked or hours in a shift for licensed and unlicensed staff. On 8/7/25 at 8:35 A.M, the surveyor observed a staff posting form posted in the lobby that was still dated 8/6/25 and included the census and number of staff broken down by job type per shift but failed to indicate the actual hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, for 14 resident rooms that housed two residents per room, located on two of four nursing units, the facility failed to ensure each resident room measured the required square footage of 80 square feet per resident in a multi-bed bedroom. Findings include: On 04/09/25, at 7:50 A.M., the surveyor observed room [ROOM NUMBER], (occupied by two residents) which measured 75 square feet per resident, instead of the required 80 feet. Observations made by the surveyor throughout the day on 04/09/25 indicated the size of the impacted rooms did not compromise the health and safety of the residents residing in the rooms. The surveyor reviewed a photocopied letter, written by the facility Administrator, dated 04/21/23, to the Department of Public Health, regarding a continued waiver request for Rooms 101-105, 118-122, 124-126 and 128. The letter indicated that the rooms were in the section of the facility constructed in 1958, and that any attempts to enlarge them would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 15 resident bedrooms measured the required square footage of 80 square feet per resident in a multi-bed bedroom. Specifically, Rooms 101 - 105, 107, 118 - 122, 124 - 126, and 128, were found to measure 75 square feet per resident, and not the required 80 square feet. Findings include: On 6/17/24 at 1:24 P.M., the surveyor observed the following rooms: 101 - 105, 107, 118 - 122, 124 - 126, and 128 which measured 75 square feet per resident, instead of the required 80 square feet. Observations made by the surveyor throughout the survey period from 4/11/24 through 4/14/24, and on 4/17/24 revealed that the size of the impacted rooms did not compromise the health and safety of the residents residing in the rooms. The surveyor reviewed a photocopied, certified letter signed by the Administrator to the Department of Public Health dated 5/30/24, regarding waiver requests for Rooms 101 - 105, 107, 118 - 122, 124 - 126, and 128. The Administrator provided the surveyor a photocopy of the original request dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 15 resident bedrooms measured the required square footage of 80 square feet per resident in a multi-bedroom. Findings include: Rooms #101,102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 124, 125, 126 and 128 measured 75 square feet per resident, instead of the required 80 square feet. During an interview and document review on 3/28/23 at 8:30 A.M., the Administrator said that he sent a letter to the Department of Public Health (DPH) on 2/1/23 to request a waiver due to low square footage, that rooms 101,102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 124, 125, 126 and 128 are located in the 1958 construction of the facility and any attempts to enlarge them would be cost prohibitive, and or, result in the loss of available Resident beds. He further said that he has not received any further correspondence. He said the room sizes did not affect the health and safety of the residents who reside in them. Observations made throughout the survey from 3/26/23 through 3/28/23 revealed that the size of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$62,250 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $9,318 — penalty dated 2024-09-17
  • $52,932 — penalty dated 2024-05-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CO 24 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2020
JJP II HOLDINGSOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 01/01/2020
NEW ENGLAND INNOVATIVE HEALTH CARE PLLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF75%since 01/01/2020
CUZZUPOLI, AMYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 01/01/2020
JALEEL, MOHAMMEDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 01/01/2020
MERCHANT, ASIFIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 01/01/2020
SOMESWARANANTHAN, JANARTHANANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 01/01/2020
WHEELER, SCOTTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 8%Other / private 28%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$379per resident / day
operating cost
$11,513per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$345per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225296. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next