Benjamin Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 205 beds and averages 80.1 residents a day — about 39% occupied, or roughly 125 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 12% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, for one of three resident units (2-West Unit), which had a resident census of 27, nine of whom were identified to be at risk for elopement, the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a safe and functional environment for residents, staff, and visitors, when the alarm on the stairwell fire door malfunctioned, the alarm was removed, and then a staff member zip tied the fire door closed, preventing the door from opening in case of an emergency for seven days from 06/18/2025 through 06/24/2025. The Facility also failed to ensure that multiple fire doors throughout the facility had functioning alarms, that a fire door self-closed once opened, and that staff monitored malfunctioning alarmed doors for resident safety. Findings include: The Facility's Protocol, titled, Fire Safety Plan, undated, indicated the Facility would establish a clear and effective response plan for fire emergencies that ensured the safety of all residents, staff, and visitors, and staff would ensure all egress paths were unobstructed. The Facility's Policy,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility 1) failed to prevent an accident resulting in a burn for 1 Resident (#29) and 2) failed to follow a fall care plan resulting in injury for 1 Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: 1. For Resident #29 the facility failed to provide supervision and setup assistance with a meal in accordance with the plan of care, resulting in a burn. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility in July 2018 with diagnoses including ataxia and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #29's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the Resident was cognitively intact and scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), had no behaviors, did not reject care and requires supervision with setup help for meals. During an interview on 11/15/22 at 1:48 P.M., Resident #29 said he/she was burned by hot tea a few months ago. Resident #29 said he/she has some weakness on his/her left side and when his/her breakfast tray was brought in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews, for three of three shower rooms utilized by the residents, the Facility failed to ensure it provided a safe, functional, and sanitary environment, when door locks to the shower rooms did not function properly, shower rooms were not clean, smelled musty, were observed with visible areas of mold, and the overhead ventilation system was nonfunctional.Findings include:The Facility Policy, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated revised August 2016, indicated the infection prevention and control program is a facility-wide effort involving all disciplines and individuals and is an integral part of the quality assurance and performance improvement program.The Policy indicated important facets of infection prevention includes the following, identifying possible infections or potential complications of existing infections, instituting measures to avoid complications or dissemination, educating staff and ensuring that they adhere to proper techniques and procedures and enhancing screening for possible significant pathogens.During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food is stored, prepared and distributed in accordance with professional standards in food safety and sanitation to prevent the spread of pathogens, which could result in foodborne illness for the residents. Specifically: 1. The facility failed to ensure frozen foods were maintained frozen. 2. The facility failed to ensure available food was not expired, and that food was dated and securely stored. 3. The facility failed to ensure the dietary staff practiced proper hand hygiene and handled food in a way to minimize possible cross-contamination. 4. The facility failed to ensure the dish machine met proper sanitation requirements when staff used expired test strips and the wrong test strips. 5. The facility failed to ensure staff tested the sanitation buckets used to clean and sanitize the kitchen and surfaces. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled (4) Freezers, Policy: It is the policy of the facility that the freezer be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, and urinary tract infection. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated Resident #28 scored a 0 out 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status indicating he/she as having severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #28 was dependent on staff for most aspects of daily care. On 4/28/25 at 8:38 A.M., Resident #28 was observed near the nursing desk in a recliner chair, Resident #28 was observed to be frail and did not respond to the surveyor's greeting. Review of Resident #28's medical record indicated that Resident #28 had a legal guardian. Review of Resident #28's paper medical record under both the care plan tab and social service tab failed to indicate documentation related to interdisciplinary care plan meetings. Review of Resident #28's electronic medical record indicated a Social Worker note, dated 5/25/24, which indiated the following: -IDT…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to adequately maintain the nutrition and hydration status of three Residents (#71, #45 and #13) out of a total sample of 24 residents 1. For Resident #71, the facility failed to ensure significant weight loss was assessed and continually monitored. 2. For Resident #45, the facility failed to implement physician's orders for weekly weights, dietary recommendations for fortified foods and the dietitian failed to evaluate significant weight loss following hospitalization. 3. For Resident #15 the facility failed to ensure quarterly nutrition assessments were completed on a resident with a feeding tube. 4. For Resident #13, the facility failed to obtain weights as ordered. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Nutrition Services, dated 2001, indicated the following: -The multidisciplinary staff, including nursing staff, the attending physician and the dietitian will assess each resident's nutritional needs, food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were provided in accordance with standards of nutritional standards to ensure the nutritional needs of residents were met. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the menu, including the therapeutic breakdown for specialized diets, was provided to the staff serving the daily meals. Findings include: Review of the 268 CMR: BOARD OF REGISTRATION OF DIETITIANS/NUTRITIONISTS 268 CMR 5.00: PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS AND ETHICAL CODES, included but was not limited to the following: (4) Foodservice Systems: In the areas of menu planning, foodservice purchasing, production, distribution and service, safety and sanitation, facility layout, and management, examples of appropriate activities include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) Planning, developing, controlling and evaluating food service systems; (b) Establishing and maintaining standards of food production, service, sanitation, safety, and security; (c) Developing menu patterns and evaluating such for nutritional adequacy; (d) Planning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses that include type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia and failure to thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated Resident #65 was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and the staff assessed his/her to have severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #65 is dependent on staff for daily care activities including bathing, dressing and eating. Further review of the MDS indicated Resident #65 as being 66 inches in height and weighing 114 pounds and has the nutritional approach of a feeding tube with the percentage of intake by artificial route as 51% or more. During an interview on 4/29/25 at 9:39 A.M., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 said Resident #65 used to receive meal trays but he/she no longer eats or takes anything by mouth. During an interview on 4/29/25 at 4:24 P.M., Nurse #7 said when Resident #65 was admitted he/she had an order for puree food and enteral feeding.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a call light for one Resident (#11) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in April 2020 with diagnoses including prostate cancer. Review of Resident #11's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of a possible 15, which indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #11 is dependent on staff for functional daily tasks. During an interview on 4/28/25 at 8:39 A.M., Resident #11 was observed lying in bed without a call light in place. Further observation indicated the Resident did not have a call light at all as the string was missing from the wall. Resident #11 said the call light string often breaks and he/she has not had a call light for some time. Resident #11 said he/she would like to have a call light as this is how he/she can call for help…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (written documents that instruct health care providers of the decisions for specific medical treatment if a person was unable to speak or lacked the capacity to make decisions for themselves) were accurately documented for one Resident (#45) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, for Resident #45, the facility failed to ensure that Advanced Directives indicated on the MOLST form (Massachusetts Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment form) were consistently documented in the medical record. Findings include: Review of Resident #45's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/1/25, indicated that the Resident could not participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam and was assessed by staff as having severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated the Resident's code status was a DNR (Do not resuscitate), DNI (Do not Intubate). Review of the medical record indicated a MOLST form signed and dated 9/21/22 that indicated Do Not Resuscitate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed accurately complete the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS) for three Residents (#45, #82 and #72) out of a total of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #45 the facility failed to accurately code the presence of a Stage 4 pressure ulcer. 2. For Resident #72 the facility failed to accurately assess his/her behaviors patterns on the comprehensive MDS. 3. For Resident #82 the facility failed to ensure an accurate discharge MDS assessment was completed. Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual (RAI Manual) 3.0, Version 1.19.1, dated October 2024 indicated the following: -Clinical standards do not support reverse staging or back staging as a way to document healing, as it does not accurately characterize what is occurring physiologically as the ulcer heals. For example, over time, even though a Stage 4 pressure ulcer has been healing and contracting such that it is less…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two Residents (#31 and #16) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #1 the facility failed to develop an Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) care plan. 2. For Resident #16, the facility failed to implement a care plan for risk of pressure injury. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, not dated, indicated the following: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. -1. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. 1. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$96,705 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $96,705 — penalty dated 2025-07-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA