Care Village at Parkway
1190 Vfw Parkway, Boston, MA 02132 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 141 certified beds · (617) 325-1688 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Nov 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $29,489 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-13)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.3% | 16.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.2% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 15.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.4% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.9% | 19.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.2% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.5% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.3% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.3% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.9% | 77.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.1% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.9% | 11.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.92 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.19 | 1.50 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
32.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 32.8%CMS range 20.9–48.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.2–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 4.0–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 141 beds and averages 125.7 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-03-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose physician's orders included the administration of oral hypoglycemic agents for treatment and management of his/her diabetes, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from a significant medication error, when on 02/09/25 nursing did not properly identify Resident #1 prior to administering him/her Levemir insulin (a long-acting insulin) via subcutaneous injection. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation and was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for close monitoring of his/her blood sugars and treatment, as needed. Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled Medication Administration-General Guidelines, undated, indicated the Following: -medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so -medications are administered in accordance with written orders of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-11-30 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviewed, interviews and observations, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was severely cognitively impaired, wandered without purpose into other residents room, and therefore resided in a private room, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from involuntarily seclusion by being confined to his/her room by staff, when on 11/14/23 from approximately 12:00 A.M. to 1:45 A.M. a bed sheet was tied to the doorknob of Resident #1's room and then tied to the handrail in the hallway outside his/her room, by Certified Nurse Aide #1 who admitted to doing it in order to prevent him/her from exiting his/her room and wandering the unit. Review of Facility video surveillance camera footage showed that Resident #1 had made attempts to open the door during that time, but was unsuccessful. Findings include: Review of Facility Policy and Procedure titled Abuse Prohibition, dated 02/20/23, indicated each resident has the right to be free from involuntary seclusion and will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including facility staff. The Policy and Procedure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable/homelike interior on three out of four units. Specifically, the facility's housekeeping and maintenance services failed to clean mice droppings, identify and repair peeled wallpaper, cracked floor tiles, stained and peeling ceilings and gouges in resident rooms. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Quality of Life-Homelike Environment' with no revision date indicated the following: -Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. -The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized homelike setting. These characteristics include cleanliness and order. On 2/25/26 the surveyor observed the following on the Garden 1 (G1) unit: - At 7:25 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (written documents that instruct health care providers of the decisions for specific medical treatment if a person was unable to speak or lacked the capacity to make decisions for themselves) were accurately documented for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, for Resident #10, the facility failed to ensure that Advanced Directives indicated on the MOLST form (Massachusetts Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment form) were consistently documented in the medical record. Findings include:Review of the facility policy, titled Massachusetts Advance Directives revised 8/3/22 indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-It is the policy of the facility to recognize and support the use of advance directives.-The Nursing Home Administrator is responsible for appointing staff who will initiate conversation to identify residents' responsible parties. Elected staff will confirm that information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for two Residents (#81 and #10) out of a total of 32 sampled Residents. Specifically,1. For Resident #81, the facility failed to provide supervision during his/her breakfast meals.2. For Resident #10, the facility failed to remove unwanted facial hair. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Activities of Daily Living, reviewed December 2022, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: -A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. -Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, the facility will provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers for one Resident (#78) out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, for Resident #78 the facility failed to elevate heels off of the mattress to prevent the development of pressure ulcers. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention, dated revised 12/22/22, indicated that the facility will implement interventions to minimize and/or eliminate contributing factors for pressure ulcer development on patients/resident at risk. Resident #78 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes, non-pressure ulcer of the right foot with muscle necrosis and depression. Review of the physician orders dated 10/4/25, indicated an order to elevate legs and float heels when in bed. Review of the facility document titled Norton Scale for Predicting Risk of Pressure Ulcer dated 2/27/23 indicated Resident # 78 is at very high risk for the development of pressure ulcers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) care plan and complete a trauma assessment for one Resident #14 out of a sample of 32 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify the residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the Resident.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled 'Trauma Informed Care' revised 12/6/21 indicated the following:-To identify residents with a history of trauma or PTSD and provide the appropriate care and services.-The facility will ensure that all residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the individuals.-Further, for residents with identified history of trauma or PTSD, the facility will provide appropriate person centered and individualized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental, and psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#106) out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from behavioral health services were relayed to the physician and implemented for Resident #106. Findings include:Resident #106 was admitted to the facility in January 2020 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia and anxiety. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/1/26, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. Further review of the MDS indicated the use of antipsychotic, antidepressant and antianxiety medications. The MDS indicated that antipsychotic medications were received on a daily basis. During an observation and interview on 2/25/26 at 7:51 A.M., the Resident was observed awake in bed. Resident #106 said that he/she was recently made aware that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were provided for one Resident (#6) out of a sample of 32 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure weekly labs were obtained according to the physician's orders. Findings include:Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses that included hyperkalemia and chronic kidney disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/21/26, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of a possible 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Physician's orders indicated the following:-Please schedule BMP (Basic Metabolic Panel, a common blood test that measures key substances in your blood to assess metabolism, kidney function, and electrolyte balance) labs every Tuesday to be drawn weekly (Wednesday). Document if the resident refuses to have labs done. Alert the provider and DON (Director of Nursing) of any refusal, dated 10/7/25. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated lab results including a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to have an adequately equipped communication system for one Resident (#1) out of a sample of 32 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to have a functioning call light.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled 'Call Light' revised 12/6/21 indicated the following:-Report all defective call lights promptly.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses including polyneuropathy and shortness of breath.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/4/26, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition.Review of the Resident's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan indicated the following:-Please assist me in toileting. I need 1 staff to assist me. Initiated: 5/1/24.-Please assist me with transfers. I need 1 staff to assist me. Initiated:5/1/24.During an observation and interview on 2/26/26 at 8:04 A.M., Resident #1 told the surveyor that he/she reported to a Nurse and the Maintenance Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure nursing notified his/her physician of a change in condition related to the development a new pressure injury on his/her right heel.Findings include: The Facility's Policy, titled Change in Resident's Condition or Status and Notification, dated as revised 01/01/2020, indicated nursing would notify the Resident's Physician when there had been a significant change in the resident's medical or mental condition or status.The Facility's Policy, titled Skin Body Audit, dated 03/12/13, indicated nursing would perform weekly skin audits on all residents, and any significant abnormal findings would be reported to the resident's physician and family.A deep tissue injury (DTI) is a form of pressure-induced damage to underlying tissues, including muscles, bones, and subcutaneous layers, while the skin surface might remain intact. It typically results from sustained pressure or shear forces that compromise blood flow, leading to ischemia and subsequent tissue necrosis.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing to have a new pressure injury to his/her right heel, the Facility failed to ensure he/she received treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice when physician orders for treatment of a new pressure injury were not obtained timely from the provider. Findings include:The Facility's Policy, titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention, dated 12/22/22, indicated the appropriate care and services would be provided to the Facility's residents to assist in the prevention of pressure ulcers and to promote optimal healing. Wounds would be reviewed by the interdisciplinary team and recommendations would be made on a weekly basis.A deep tissue injury (DTI) is a form of pressure-induced damage to underlying tissues, including muscles, bones, and subcutaneous layers, while the skin surface might remain intact. It typically results from sustained pressure or shear forces that compromise blood flow, leading to ischemia and subsequent tissue necrosis. Recognizing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews and review of surveillance camera video footage, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and was cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a respectful and dignified manner which included being free from the use of restraints, when on 05/01/25, nursing staff used a bed sheet wrapped around the Resident #1's chest then tucked it under his/her arms and tied behind Resident #1's wheelchair, to keep him/her from getting up. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Physical Restraints, dated December 2022, indicated the facility recognizes each resident's right to be free from any physical restraint imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience and not required to treat a medical condition. Further review indicated the facility recognizes the necessity of maintaining a systematic method of evaluating and monitoring restraint use and any resident who is utilizing a device that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents in a dignified manner during the dining experience. Specifically, 1. For Resident #56 who was dependent on staff for assistance with meals, the facility failed to provide assistance when his/her meal was delivered. 2. For Resident #66 who was dependent on staff for assistance with meals, the facility failed to provide assistance when his/her meal was delivered. 3. On the [NAME] 2 unit and the China Garden 1 unit, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience. 4. On the China Garden 2 unit, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience in the dining room. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dignity/Quality of Life, dated 12/6/21, indicated Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. 1. Resident #56 was admitted to the facility in June 2020 with diagnoses that included dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment during dining on three of four nursing units. Specifically, on the [NAME] 1, China Garden 1 and China Garden 2 units, residents were observed eating meals on meal trays in the dining rooms. Findings include: The surveyor made the following observations: - On 2/11/25 at 11:50 A.M., the surveyor observed residents eating their lunch on meal trays in the [NAME] 1 dining room. - On 2/11/25 at 12:00 P.M., the surveyor observed residents eating their lunch on meal trays in the China Garden 1 dining room. - On 2/12/25 at 8:20 A.M., the surveyor observed residents eating their breakfast on meal trays in the China Garden 2 dining room. - On 2/12/25 at 8:40 A.M., the surveyor observed residents eating their breakfast on meal trays in the [NAME] 1 dining room. During an interview on 2/12/25 at 8:48 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #8 said the residents normally eat their meals in the dining room off their trays. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide an activities program to: 1. the residents on the [NAME] 2 Unit, out of four units, and 2. four Residents (#3, #120, #32 and #52) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: 1. The following observations were made on the [NAME] 2 unit during survey: - The activity calendar failed to list any group activities on the unit for 2/11/25 and no group activities were held on the unit throughout the day on 2/11/25. - On 2/11/25 from 10:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. until lunch was served, there were 11 residents sitting in the dining room with the television on. One resident was watching the television, and the rest of the residents were observed sitting in silence at tables without individualized activity materials. Two of the residents were sleeping. Staff were in the room completing their documentation and were not interacting with the residents. There was no activity staff observed on the unit. - On 2/11/25 at 2:14 P.M., there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, the facility failed to perform annual performance reviews for three of three sampled Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) records. Findings include: Review of three out of three CNA employment records indicated that annual performance reviews were not completed as required. During an interview on 2/13/25 at 11:58 P.M., the Regional Administrator said that CNA's should have annual performance evaluations.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed ensure medications were properly labeled and dated with an expiration, on 1 of 4 nursing units. Findings include: The United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) General Chapter 797 [16] recommends the following for multi-dose vials of sterile pharmaceuticals: If a multi-dose has been opened or accessed (e.g., needle-punctured) the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different (shorter or longer) date for that opened vial. The manufacturer's expiration date refers to the date after which an unopened multi-dose vial should not be used. The beyond-use-date refers to the date after which an opened multi-dose vial should not be used. The beyond-use-date should never exceed the manufacturer's original expiration date. Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications, not dated, indicated: When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#82) was seen by the dentist for routine cleaning and had his/her dentures replaced once missing, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Dental Services and Denture Services, dated December 2022, indicated the following: -Purpose: To ensure that residents receive routine and emergent dental services to meet their individual needs. -Policy: Routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. -Oral heath services are available to meet the resident's needs. -Our facility has a contract with a dentist that comes to the facility and provided dental services on a routine basis. -Nursing services or designee is responsible for scheduling dental services as needed. -Should a resident's dentures become lost or damaged, the facility will refer the resident to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to properly store food items to prevent the risk of foodborne illness and ensure food trays and dinnerware were in good condition. Specifically: 1. The facility failed to separate staff's personal food items from resident food items in the walk-in refrigerator and properly label and date food. 2 The facility failed to ensure resident's meal trays and food domes were in good condition. Findings include: 1. During the initial walk-through of the kitchen on 2/11/25 at 7:03 A.M., the surveyor made the following observations in the reach-in refrigerator: - A box of opened, unlabeled, undated donuts with resident food. - A container of unlabeled, undated brown, congealed food in a plastic Tupperware container. - A container of red paste not labeled or dated. During an interview on 2/11/25 at 7:11 A.M., the Food Service Director (FSD) said the donuts and Tupperware of brown material were a staff member's food and they should not be stored with resident food. The FSD continued to say the red paste was a container of ketchup and all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program. Specifically, the facility failed to implement recommendations made by the contracted pest control company to reduce the risk of pest infestations. Findings include: Review of the facility titled Pest Control policy, undated, indicated: This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Pest control services will be provided by a licensed contractor. Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services During the Resident Group Interview on 2/12/25 at 10:07 A.M., all participating residents said the facility had mice, roaches, and fruit flies. They said the facility has an exterminator once a week but reported the problem persists. Review of the pest control log visits indicated: - 1/4/25: Comments: Upon arrival I inspected all exterior areas of the building finding moderate rodent activity within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#82 and #120) had their call lights within reach, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Call Light, dated 12/6/21, indicated the following: - Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs. - Policy: When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. 1. Resident #82 was admitted to the facility in November 2022 with diagnoses including stroke and hemiplegia. Review of Resident #82's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/10/24, indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of a possible 15, indicating he/she is cognitively intact. During an interview on 2/11/25 at 8:04 A.M., Resident #82 said he/she often cannot reach his/her call light as it is tied up against the wall. During this interview, Resident #82's call light was observed to be tied up and placed above the light structure and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (written documents that instruct health care providers of the decisions for specific medical treatment if a person was unable to speak or lacked the capacity to make decisions for themselves) consent was valid in the medical record for one Resident (#66) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Massachusetts Advance Directives, dated 8/3/22, indicated It is policy of the facility to recognize and support the use of advanced directives. If a resident is incompetent, but has evidence of a properly executed advance directive, the facility will implement the resident's choices as outlined in their directive document. Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in April 2019 with diagnoses that included cerebral infraction, dysphagia, bipolar disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of Resident #66's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/8/25, indicated he/she was assessed by nursing staff to have severe cognitive impairments.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed for one discharged Resident (#133), out of three applicable discharged resident records reviewed. Findings include: Resident #133 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 and had diagnoses that included but not limited to cervical disc disorder, high cervical region, chronic pain, and monoplegia of upper limb following a cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 8/26/24, indicated Resident #133 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating he/she as having intact cognition and required supervision/touching assistance for ambulation. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/22/24, indicated a Discharge-Return Not Anticipated was coded. Further review indicated the MDS was coded as a planned discharge and checked as a discharged to short term general hospital (acute hospital, IPPS).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed for one Resident (#11) to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level I was requested from DMH/Designee after the Resident was screened to have a Serious Mental Illness (SMI) and exceeded the discharge exception of 30 calendar days, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in September 2019 and had diagnoses that included but are not limited to bipolar disorder. Review of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review dated 9/24/19 indicated Resident #11 had a positive SMI screen. Further review of the PASARR indicated Resident #11's expected stay in a nursing facility was for less than 30 calendar days as certified by the hospital's attending or discharge practitioner. Review of the Level 1 PASARR indicated if the nursing facility determines that the resident's stay will exceed the 30-day exemption period, the nursing facility must complete Section G in this form and submit the Level 1 form to the DMH/Designee by no later than the 28th calendar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement the physician orders for five Residents (#59, #11, #132, #131 and #133) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #59, the facility failed to obtain monthly weights as ordered. 2. For Resident #11, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for a dressing to his/her left shin. 3. For Resident #132, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for a Registered Nurse (RN) pronouncement of death. 4a. For Resident #131 and 4b. Resident #133, the facility failed to obtain an order to discharge from the facility. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised [DATE], indicated the following: - Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for dependent residents for one Resident (#16) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide supervision with meals as per the plan of care for Resident #16. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, dated December 2022, indicated the following: - Purpose: To provide support, assistance, and encouragement to remain as independent as possible with activities of daily living, including dining. - The facility will provide care and services for the following activities of daily living: Dining - eating, including meals and snacks. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including lack of coordination, altered mental status, dysphagia and contracture of the left hand. Review of Resident #16's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide quality of care for one Resident (#11) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify a round dark red area on Resident #11's left shin and failed to identify areas on his/her right shin, consistent with being bruised. Findings include: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in September 2019 and has diagnoses that include nontraumatic subdural hemorrhage, lack of coordination, adult failure to thrive and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #11 scored a 10 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating he/she as having moderately intact cognition and requires substantial/maximal assist from staff for bathing and dressing. During an observation and interview on 2/11/25 at 8:06 A.M., Resident #11 was sitting up in his/her bed with his/her lower legs visible. Resident #11's left shin was observed with a small round dark…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide one Resident (#88) with hearing devices out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including sensorineural hearing loss. Review of Resident #88's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/2/25, indicated the Resident scored 11 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating he/she had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated the Resident has moderate difficulty hearing. During an interview on 2/11/25 at 11:00 A.M., Resident #88 was unable to be interviewed secondary to his/her hearing impairment. During this interview, Resident #88 was not wearing a hearing aid in either ear. Throughout all days of the survey, Resident #88 was not observed to be wearing hearing aids. Review of Resident #88's physician orders indicated the following order: - Resident has both hearing aide(s). Apply in AM (morning) and remove at HS (every night). Store in med cart. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents at risk for developing pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent new ulcers from developing for one Resident (#20) out of a total of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #20 was wearing prevalon boots to offload heels while in bed as ordered. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention, dated and revised 12/22/22, indicated the following: - The facility will implement interventions to minimize and/or eliminate contributing factors for pressure ulcer development on patients/residents at risk. - The facility will provide education for treatment and prevention of pressure ulcers to caregivers. - Positioning: Use pillows or specialty devices and support surfaces to float or off-load heels. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in December 2023 with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#80), out of a total sample of 27 residents received proper care and treatment to maintain good foot health. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Nursing Care of the Resident with Diabetes Mellitus, dated 2015, indicated Skin and Foot care: 8. Toenails should only be trimmed by personnel qualified to do so (this can be regular associates, and does not have to be a podiatrist. Documentation: Documentation should reflect the carefully assessed diabetic resident and include the following: 12. Assessment of the feet include the following: a. Hygiene; g. The condition of the toes and toenails. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes, aphasia, and cerebral infarction. Review of Resident #80's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/17/24, indicated he/she scored a 10 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement the use of a hand carrot (orthotic) in accordance with the physician's order and the rehabilitation plan of care for one Resident (#16), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including lack of coordination, altered mental status, and contracture of the left hand. Review of Resident #16's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 2 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated that the Resident had functional limitation in range of motion on his/her upper extremity. The surveyor made the following observations: - On 2/11/25 at 8:56 A.M., Resident #16 was eating breakfast in his/her room. The Resident's left hand was closed into a fist, the surveyor asked if he/she was able to open it and he/she could only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to investigate falls for two Residents (#13 and #133) of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #13, the facility failed to investigate his/her fall to the ground in the outdoor smoking area. 2. For Resident #133, the facility failed to ensure an incident report and investigation was completed after getting his/her hand caught in the elevator. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Accidents and Incidents - Investigation and Reporting, not dated, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - In the event that a fall occurs, the facility will investigate the factors contributing to the fall and develop a plan of action to minimize further falls. - All accidents or incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc., occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the Administrator. - Evaluate why the resident may have fallen, clarify the details of the fall. 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in August 2020 and had diagnoses which included multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services in accordance with professional standards of practice for three Residents (#30, #68 and #74) out of a total sample of 27 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident #30's nebulizer equipment was bagged and dated. 2. Ensure that Resident #68's oxygen flow rate followed physician orders. 3. Ensure that Resident #74's oxygen flow rate followed physician's orders and ensure his/her a bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPap) mask was kept clean and sanitary. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration Policy and Procedure, dated 12/6/22, indicated the following: - Orders should specify the oxygen equipment and flow rate or concentration required as routine or PRN (as needed). - Oxygen equipment will be checked daily for: Correct flow and concentration. - Procedures: Check physician's order. If it is unclear, clarification must be obtained. - Resident compliance with therapy. 1. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental, and psychosocial well-being for two Residents (#85 and #16) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure an individualized care plan for Resident #85, who has a secondary diagnosis of Substance Use Disorder (SUD), was developed. 2. Ensure recommendations from behavioral health services were relayed to the physician and implemented for Resident #16. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled 'Substance Use Disorder' last revised March 15, 2021, indicated the Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to avoid relapse of residents who have a substance use disorder and to remain a drug free environment where residents receive exceptional healthcare services. Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) have lasting adverse effects on an individual's functioning, mental, physical, social emotional and, or spiritual well-being. It is our role as healthcare workers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy identified irregularities for one Resident (#15) of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, an antidepressant was incorrectly prescribed for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). Findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 and had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (dated 8/19/20), depression, cerebral vascular accident and Parkinson's disease. Review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status exam score of 2 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated he/she was prescribed an antidepressant. Review of Resident #15's physician's order dated 10/9/24, indicated: - Sertraline HCL (antidepressant medication) capsule 150 mg (milligrams). Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for nausea and vomiting related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary medications for one Resident (#66) out of a total of 27 sampled residents. Specifically for Resident #66, the facility failed to ensure there was a re-assessment date for his/her as needed (PRN) Ativan. Findings include: Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in April 2019 with diagnoses that included cerebral infraction, dysphagia, bipolar disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of Resident #66's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/8/25, indicated he/she was assessed by nursing staff to have severe cognitive impairments. Review of Resident #66's physician order, dated 1/28/25, indicated Ativan (a benzodiazepine medication used to treat anxiety) Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (milligrams), Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for anxiety agitation. On 2/13/25 at 8:49 A.M., Nurse #2 said an as needed Ativan order needs a stop and re-assessment date. On 2/13/25 at 11:08 A.M., the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) said an as needed Ativan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained an accurate medical record for two Residents (#88 and #16) out of a sample of 27 residents. Specifically, they failed to: 1. For Resident #88, the facility failed to accurately document if he/she was wearing his/her hearing aids. 2. For Resident #16, the facility documented that the Resident was wearing his/her left hand splint when he/she was not. Findings include: 1. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including sensorineural hearing loss. Review of Resident #88's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/2/25, indicated the Resident scored 11 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating he/she had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated the Resident has moderate to difficulty hearing. During an interview on 2/11/25 at 11:00 A.M., Resident #88 was unable to be interviewed secondary to his/her hearing impairment. During this interview, Resident #88 was not wearing a hearing aid in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3), the Facility failed to ensure it maintained complete and accurate medical records, when Health Care Proxy activation forms were filled out and signed by the physician, however there were no Health Care Proxy forms and therefore no designated Health Care Agents, on file in the medical records. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Medical Records, dated 06/20/24, indicated the Facility would create and maintain accurate, organized resident records in accordance with industry standards. The Facility Policy, titled MA Advanced Directives, dated 08/03/22, indicated: - A Health Care Proxy (HCP) was a legal document that a competent adult may complete to identify an agent or agents who would make their health care decisions, should they be deemed incompetent by a physician or nurse practitioner. - Should it be determined by a physician or nurse practitioner that a resident does not have the capacity to make health care decisions, an existing HCP should be invoked. If the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve what was listed on the menu, or provide a substitution, for a breakfast meal. Findings include: On 3/28/24 at 8:01 A.M., the cook was observed plating from the serving line and was serving mixed fruit and a muffin. Review of the menu for the week indicated that the a 4oz yogurt should have been served in addition to the fruit and muffin. During an interview on 3/28/24 at 8:03 A.M., the cook said that they had run out of yogurt and he did not make a substitution. During an interview on 3/28/24 at 8:07 A.M., the Food Service Director said that he was not made aware that the staff had run out of yogurt, but he would have expected them to tell him so he could make a substitution. The Food Service Director said that when a substitution is made he has to get approval from the dietitian and then will plan to make a substitution.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to inform two Residents (#19 and #49), out of a total sample of 26 residents, of their right to be informed of the use of psychotropic medications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Psychotropic Medication Treatment in Long Term Care Centers, dated January 2021, indicated the following: -Prior to administering psychotropic medication listed on the schedule created under subsection (b), a facility shall obtain the informed written consent of the resident, resident's health care proxy or the resident's guardian. Informed written consent shall be obtained on a form approved by the department, which shall include, at a minimum, the following information: (i) the purpose for administering the listed psychotropic drug; (ii) the prescribed dosage; and (iii) any known effect of side effect of the psychotropic medication. The written consent form shall be kept in the resident's medical record. 1. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in February, 2023 with diagnoses including dementia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide professional standards of practice for two Resident (#53 and #97), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #53 the facility failed to offload heels as ordered. 2. For Resident #97 the facility failed to ensure the Resident wore Prevalon boots while in bed as ordered. Findings Include: 1. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility in August, 2021 with diagnoses including quadriplegia, muscle spasm and pressure induced deep tissue damage of left heel. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/28/24, indicated that Resident #53 had intact short term and long-term memory. The MDS further indicated the Resident was at risk for pressure ulcers and had an unhealed deep tissue pressure injury. Review of Resident #53's current physician orders indicated the following: -Offload bilateral heels every shift related to functional quadriplegia. On 3/26/24 at 8:18 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #53 lying in bed with his/her heels directly placed on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of meaningful and person-centered group activities designed to meet the interests of, and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for residents on two out of three resident care units. Findings include: During the Resident Group meeting on 3/27/24 at 11:00 A.M., 8 of 8 residents reported the following: -There have been no group activities at the facility for months and that they wished there would be activities again so that they would have something to do during the day. -The facility used to have activities such as Bingo, music and arts and crafts but they are no longer offered, despite what is scheduled on the activity calendar. -Two girls volunteer one hour a day, a few days a week at the facility, but that they do not run activities. Review of the activity calendar indicated that on 3/28/23 the following activities were scheduled for the morning: -9:30 A.M.: Gentle exercise. -10:00 A.M.: Bible study. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#3), who required dialysis, that they receive such services consistent with professional standards of practice, out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #3 the facility failed to ensure nursing maintained visible and accessible emergency equipment supplies at the bedside. Findings include: The facility policy titled End Stage Renal Disease, Care of Resident With, dated January 1, 2020, indicated: -Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. -Staff caring for residents with ESRD, including residents receiving dialysis care outside the facility, shall be trained in the care and special needs of these residents. -Education and training of staff includes, specifically: d. How to recognize and intervene in medical emergencies such as hemorrhages and septic infections. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in September, 2018 and has diagnoses that include End Stage Renal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent. One out of two nurses observed made five errors in 28 opportunities on one of three units resulting in a medication error rate of 17.86%. These errors impacted two Residents (#99 and #8), out of 4 residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration- General Guidelines, undated, indicated the following: -Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. -Five rights- right resident, right drug, right dose, right route and right time, are applied for each medication being administered. A triple check of these five rights is recommended at three steps in the process of preparation of a medication for administration. When the medication is selected, when the dose is removed from the container and finally just after the dose is prepared and the medication is put away. 1. During a medication pass on 3/27/24 at 8:04 A.M., the surveyor observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal laws. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored according with manufacture's guidelines on one of three sampled medication carts. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Storage of Medications, undated, indicated medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. H. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal -Expiration Dating (Beyond-use dating) C. Certain medications or package types, such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow a therapeutic diet, as prescribed by the attending physician, for one Resident (#15) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #15 the facility failed to ensure the kitchen provided a fluid restriction as ordered by the physician. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Fluid Restriction, dated 12/21/22, indicated fluid restrictions are ordered, in writing, by physicians in the individual's medical record. Both the Dietary Department and Nursing Department are assigned specific amounts of fluids they may provide the individual daily. -Purpose: To standardize and communicate nutrition care approaches and processes throughout the organization. -Procedure: 1. Nursing personnel are responsibility for informing Dietary of residents placed on fluid restrictions, specifying the cc level permitted. 2. Nursing must determine specific cc levels of fluids to be provide by dietary and specific levels…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented for two Residents (#40 and #97) out of a total of 26 sampled Residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #40 the facility failed to ensure nursing documented wound treatments as complete. 2. For Resident #97 the facility failed to ensure nursing accurately documented when Prevalon boots were applied in the Treatment Administration Record. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Wound Care, undated, indicated: The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The type of wound care given. 2. The date and time the wound care was given. 4. The name and title of the individual performing the wound care. 10. The signature and titled of the person recording the data. 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in November 2016 with diagnoses including dementia and osteoarthritis. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/17/24, indicated Resident #40 had a stage 4 pressure ulcer and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a gap in the bed was filled to prevent possible entrapment for one Resident (#97) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Side Rail Entrapment Risk, undated, indicated the following: -Each resident will have a safe and comfortable bed environment that meets his/her assessed needs. -The space between the bed rail and the mattress and the headboard and the mattress should be filled either by an added firm inlay or a mattress that creates an interface with the bed rail that prevents an individual from falling between the mattress and bed rails. -Maintenance and monitoring of bed, mattress, and accessories such as resident/ caregiver assist items should be on going. -The entrapment assessment will use the standard form and measuring tool and assess recognized entrapment zones. -Resolution may include an alternate mattress, alternate type or style of rails, adding padding to space at the head or foot of the bed, or similar entrapment risk mitigation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who developed a new wound to his/her right foot and had physician orders to be seen by the podiatrist and the facility wound physician, the facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with quality of care that met professional standards of practice, when he/she was not seen by a podiatrist and there was a delay in being seen by the facility wound team for evaluation and treatment for his/her new pressure injury. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's clinical record indicated diagnoses included cerebral infarction (lack of blood supply to the brain cells) with left sided weakness, bipolar disorder (manic depression), high blood pressure and antiphospholipid syndrome (immune disorder that can cause blood clots). Resident #1's Annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated 11/2023 indicated he/she had moderate cognitive impairment, and required partial to substantial staff assistance with personal hygiene and dressing. Resident #1's Plan of Care, related to Risk for Skin Breakdown, initiated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) who had physician orders for wound dressing changes, the facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate resident treatment records related to documentation of wounds and dressing changes. Findings include: Review of the Facility policy, Charting and Documentation, undated, indicated that any services provided to the resident, or any changes in the resident's medical or mental condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. Observations, medications administered, services performed, etc., will be documented in the resident's clinical records. Documentation of procedures and treatments shall include care-specific details and shall include at a minimum: - Date and time the procedure/treatment was provided; - Name and title of the individual(s) who provided the care; - The assessment data and or any unusual findings obtained during the procedure/treatment; - How the resident tolerated the procedure/treatment; - Whether the resident refused the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a compete and accurate medical record, when although staff members said Resident #1 did not wear and had never required the use of a wanderguard bracelet (electronic monitoring device that triggers an alarm to sound when person wearing it enters into close proximity of alarm sensor), his/her Care Plan Interventions, however, identified that he/she required the use of a wanderguard bracelet daily and also indicated that nursing staff needed to check for the positioning and function of his/her wanderguard bracelet every shift. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's clinical record indicated his/her diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, Psychotic Disturbance, Major Depressive Disorder, wedge compression fracture of first lumbar vertebra, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of Resident #1's Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 10/27/23, indicated he/she was at low risk and does not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-02-27 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the Resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer/discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand and failed to provide in writing the facility's bed hold policy, for one Resident (#128) out of one hospitalized resident sampled. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Transfer/Discharge Notification, dated September 2019, indicated that the facility will issue residents appropriate transfer/discharge notifications and guidance on their right to appeal, in a manner in which the resident/representative understand. Resident #128 was admitted to the facility in September 2025 with diagnoses including cancer of the stomach and esophagus and severe malnutrition. Review of the progress notes indicated that Resident #128 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Further review failed to indicate a transfer/discharge notice or a bed hold policy was provided to the Resident or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-02-13 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing information daily as required. Findings include: During the survey the surveyor was unable to locate the staffing posting that is required to be available for residents and visitors to view. During an observation and interview on 2/12/25 at 12:16 P.M., the Appointment Coordinator, found an empty plastic frame by the receptionist and said it is used for the daily staff posting. The facility appointment coordinator said that when she was the scheduler, she would post the staffing daily and that the current scheduler should be posting the daily staffing. During an interview on 2/12/25 at 12:22 P.M., the Scheduler said she did not post the staffing today or yesterday and then said she has not posted the staffing since she started working here a few months ago.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$29,489 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $11,231 — penalty dated 2025-02-13
- $18,258 — penalty dated 2023-11-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BEAR MOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2018 |
| KAPLAN, MICHAEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/18/2022 |
| ZISKIN, SCOTT | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/01/2024 |
| PARKWAY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2018 |
| BASTIEN, REGINALD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/20/2026 |
| IDUMWONYI, EGHOSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/20/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $547K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225497. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.