Affinity Healthcare
1102 Washington Street, Braintree, MA 02184 · For profit - Corporation · 177 certified beds · (781) 848-3100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,648 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-26)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.1% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.0% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.7% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.9% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.4% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.6% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.5% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.6% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 48.2% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.7% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.8% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.37 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.36 | 1.50 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.2%CMS range 9.3–20.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 177 beds and averages 115.2 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.37 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.36 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled Residents (Resident #1), who resided on a secured unit, made verbal statements to staff a desire to leave the Facility, had a Guardianship in place, and a care plan that indicated that he/she would remain within the Facility unless supervised, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with an adequate level of staff supervision to maintain his/her safety in an effort to prevent an elopement. On 6/23/25, Resident #1 exited the secure second-floor unit (B2), unsupervised and unbeknownst to staff, through a locked and alarmed door which lead to a fire escape. At the time of the elopement, three staff members working on the B2 Unit, failed to recognize that the sounding alarm had been triggered by the opening of the door leading to the fire escape and instead mistook the alarm for a malfunction. Resident #1 descended the fire escape into a secure courtyard, climbed over a fence and left the Facility grounds. Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for three of three sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3), who all resided on a locked, secured unit (B1), were on scheduled safety checks by unit staff, and required staff supervision, both on and off the unit, the Facility failed to ensure they provided an adequate level of staff supervision, which included unit staff responding adequately to exit door alarms, to prevent an incident of elopement. On [DATE] at approximately 11:17 P.M., Residents #1, #2, and #3, exited through the locked and alarmed door of their unit undetected by staff, made their way onto the elevator, proceeded to the main entrance/exit door leading to the parking lot, exited through the front alarmed door and proceeded to walk away from the facility. Although a staff member saw the residents get off of the elevator, she did not question them or alert other staff. An off duty staff member noticed Resident #1 and #3 down the street from the facility with police, and alerted staff at the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a physician's order for nursing to monitor his/her oxygenation saturations (measures the percentage of hemoglobin binding sites in the bloodstream occupied by oxygen) levels, which included to notify the physician if his/her saturation levels dropped below a specific percentage, the Facility failed to ensure his/her physician was notified of changes in his/her oxygen saturation levels, when Resident #1's levels fell below the physicians ordered percentage parameters on multiple occasions, and the physician was not notified.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status dated, as last revised 02/2021, indicated that the Facility promptly notifies the resident, his/her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental conditions and/or status.The Policy indicated that the nurse will notify the residents attending physician or physician on call when there has been a specific instruction to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was developed and/or implemented for three Residents (#21, #90, and #9), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #21, to develop and implement a potential/at risk for skin breakdown care plan and an actual skin alteration care plan for a chronic burn/wound requiring monitoring and wound care;2. For Resident #90, to implement interventions on the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Fall care plans specific to transfer and ambulation status; and3. For Resident #9, to develop and implement an individualized resident centered care plan for a known history of insomnia. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Participation-Assessment/Care Plans, dated as last revised 8/2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The Care Planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and his/her needs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure individualized comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised to accurately reflect care needs for one Resident (#90), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised after a significant change in October 2025. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition of Status, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following:-A Significant Change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that:a. will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease related clinical interventions; b. impacts more than one area of the resident's health status; andc. requires interdisciplinary review to the care plan. Resident #90 was admitted to the facility in June 2025 with diagnoses which include unsteadiness on feet, anoxic brain injury, dementia, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the medical record indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#21), out of a total sample of 25 residents, received necessary treatment and services to promote healing of an alteration in skin integrity related to a burn of third degree (involves all layers of skin and sometime muscle/fat under the tissue) of left lower limb. Specifically, the facility failed to accurately transcribe and implement wound care orders per the hospital discharge summary and physician's orders for two months. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication and Treatment Orders, dated as last revised 4/2018, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with regulatory standards. Review of the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, 11th Edition (2019) indicated: Scope of Practice, Licensure, and Certification: The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure appropriate holding temperatures for time/temperature control for safety (TCS) foods;2. Handle ready-to-eat food (food which does not require cooking or further preparation prior to consumption) to prevent cross contamination; and3. Ensure kitchenettes were maintained in a clean, sanitary, and organized manner, and food was properly stored, labeled, and dated in four of four kitchenettes. Findings include:1. Review of the 2022 Food Code by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indicated, but was not limited to:3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding.(A) Except during preparation, cooking, or cooling, or when time is used as the public health control as specified under S3-501.19, and except as specified under (B) and in (C) of this section, TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record was maintained for one Resident (#5), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the percentage of lunch consumed was accurately documented after the meal was provided and fed to Resident #5 on 17 of 35 days reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Charting and Documentation, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following:-All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional, or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care.-Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses which included protein calorie malnutrition, adult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed, for one Resident (#9), out of a total sample of 25 residents, to notify the Resident's attending physician of a potential adverse effect from a newly started medication.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, last revised 2/2021, indicated but was not limited to:The nurse will notify the Resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a (an):-adverse reaction to medicationResident #9 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses which include insomnia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/6/25, indicated he/she scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam indicating his/her mental cognition was intact.During an interview on 12/10/25 at 1:46 P.M., Resident #9 said he/she cannot wake up from night terrors/nightmares that he/she is having since starting the new medication mirtazapine (for insomnia). Review of Resident #9's Physician's Orders indicated but was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for one Resident (#9), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medication recommendations for Resident #9 were communicated to and addressed by the Attending Physician. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Services, last revised 2/2021, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The attending physician will determine the relevance of any recommended interventions from other disciplines.-Consultive services are made available from community-based consultants.Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses which included insomnia, anxiety disorder, personality disorders, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), unspecified psychosis, and adult physical abuse.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/6/25, indicated he/she scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure treatment carts were locked when not in direct supervision of the licensed nurse on one of four units observed.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage, dated as revised February 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments. Only authorized personnel have access to keys.-Compartments (including drawers, cabinets, rooms, carts, and boxes) containing medications and biologicals are locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items are not left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others.On 12/9/25 at 7:39 A.M., the surveyor observed an unlocked treatment cart positioned in front of the nursing station on the M2 unit. There were no nursing staff in the vicinity of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespreadEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a monthly medication regimen review was completed once per month for five out of five Residents (#3, #13, #117, #79, and #88) selected for unnecessary medication review and one out of one Resident (#94) reviewed for medication side effects. Specifically, the facility failed to have a licensed pharmacist conduct a drug regimen review for each resident in the months of May, June, July, and August 2024. Findings include: Review of the facility's pharmaceutical services contract indicated for Pharmacy Consulting Services- At the facility's written request, the Pharmacy shall arrange for a third party consultant pharmacist to provide pharmacy consulting services to the facility. The facility and such pharmacy consultant shall contract directly with each other and the Pharmacy shall have no other duties, responsibilities or liability with respect to such pharmacy consultant. During the entrance conference on 9/19/24 on 9:30 A.M., the Administrator said the facility had entered new ownership effective 4/1/24 and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was clean, comfortable, and homelike. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the resident common areas (activity rooms, pub/parlor/dining rooms) were maintained in good repair (without holes, painted) and homelike on units M2 and B2. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Right-Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment, dated as last revised September 2021, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of the facility to provide a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment in such a manner to acknowledge and respect resident rights -Housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior During all days of survey (9/19-9/26/24), the surveyor observed the following: Unit B2: -the unit hallway had multiple areas where hand sanitizer pumps had been removed, revealing unpainted torn drywall -the dining room had a hole in the wall approximately three inches long by one and a half inches…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (written documents that instruct health care providers of the decisions for specific medical treatment if a person was unable to speak or lacked the capacity to make decisions for themselves) were formulated and maintained in the medical record for one Resident (#106), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Advanced Directives were reviewed, documented, valid, and maintained in the medical record. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Advanced Directives, dated as last revised 1/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Advanced directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy. -Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advanced directed shall be displayed in the medical record. -The plan of care will be consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advanced directives. -Advanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#35) with a gastrostomy tube, of a total sample of 25 residents, that medications were administered in accordance with the physician's order and Professional Standards of Practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Nurse #3 followed the physician's order when administering each of the Resident's medications via the gastrostomy tube (GT). Findings include: Review of the [NAME] Skill Checklist for Taylor's Clinical Nursing Skills. A Nursing Process Approach, 5th Edition, Skill 5-2 Administering Medications via a Gastric Tube, the following standard included but was not limited to the following: 10. Prepare medication. Pills: Using a pill crusher, crush each pill one at a time. Dissolve the powder with water or other recommended liquid in a liquid medication cup, keeping each medication separate from the others. Keep the package label with the medication cup, for future comparison of information.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff stored all drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice prior to administration for 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to: -For Residents #47, #82, and #117, ensure staff did not pre-pour medications and store them in the medication cart; and -Ensure Schedule II-V controlled substance medications were maintained in a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled General Guidelines for Medication Administration, dated September 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices, and only by persons legally authorized to administer. -Medications are administered at the time they are prepared. Medications are not prepared either in advance of medication pass or for more than one resident at a time. On 9/25/24 at 10:57 A.M., the surveyor and Nurse #1 observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that dignity was provided during the dining experience for seven Residents (#9, #33, #27, #37, #51, #76 and #77), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: 1. For Residents #9, #33, #37, #51, #76 and #77, staff did not provide a towel as a clothing protector while eating; 2. For Residents #9, #27, #33, #46, #51, #77, staff delivered meals to all residents seated at the table simultaneously, resulting in residents waiting an extended period of time to receive their meal while watching their tablemates eat; and 3. For Resident #51, did not stand over the Resident while feeding him/her in the dining room. Findings include: 1. On 6/27/23 at 11:50 A.M. and 6/28/23 at 11:44 A.M., the surveyor observed six Residents (#9, #33, #37, #51, #76 and #77) of seven Residents in the B-2 Unit dining room with white towels draped around their necks as clothing protectors. 2. On 6/28/23 at 11:44 A.M., the surveyor observed seven residents in the B-2 Unit dining room: two Residents (#76 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of the rehab consultant's contract and policy, review of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) guidelines, review of Massachusetts law, and interviews, the facility failed to provide skilled physical therapy services in accordance with professional standards when the physical therapist is supervising the physical therapist assistant from an offsite setting and when providing telehealth physical therapy. In addition, based on observations, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their falls policy after Resident #107 fell. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Provide regularly scheduled, documented collaboration between the physical therapist and the physical therapy assistant regarding patient care; 2. For Residents #91, #17, and #117, ensure the the physical therapist performed at least a monthly onsite re-examination of the Residents and failed to include the required information and consent for telehealth visit for the discharge assessment; and 3. For Resident #107, follow their policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-03 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision for one Resident (#62), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #61's eye examination recommendations, to be seen and evaluated by a glaucoma specialist, were implemented. Findings include: Resident #62 was admitted to the facility in November 2016 with diagnoses which included diabetes and stroke with right-sided paralysis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/15/23, indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating the Resident was cognitively intact. In addition, section B1200 indicated the Resident wears corrective lenses. During an interview on 6/29/23 at 5:15 P.M., Resident #62 said he/she has been seen by the eye doctor and is supposed to see an eye specialist for the right eye evaluation of his/her cataract and glaucoma and they have never made an appointment. The Resident said the same thing happened last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed for one Resident (#51), out of a total sample of 29 residents, to ensure effective interventions were implemented to prevent three unwitnessed falls. Findings include: Review of the facility's policies titled Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting, last revised 11/2017, and Assessing Falls and Their Causes, last revised 11/2018, included but was not limited to: -The following data, as applicable, shall be included on the Report of Incident/Accident form: k. Any corrective action taken; l. Follow-up information; m. Other pertinent data as necessary or required; After a fall: -Within 24 hours of a fall, the nursing staff will begin to try to identify possible or likely causes of the incident. They will refer to resident-specific evidence including medical history, known functional impairments, etc. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in April 2021 with diagnoses including Huntington's disease (progressive neurological disease). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist identified and reported irregularities (use of a medication that is inconsistent with accepted standards of practice) and/or recommendations were addressed by the physician or physician extender for three Residents (#13, #37, and #70), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #13, ensure the consultant pharmacist's recommendations were addressed to ensure there was a stop date for an as needed (prn) Klonopin (anticonvulsant used as adjunct therapy for psychosis) as required, and an appropriate indication for antipsychotic therapy was identified on the physician's order; 2. For Resident #37, ensure the consultant pharmacist identified and reported an irregularity regarding inappropriate diagnoses to justify the use of antipsychotic medication; and 3. For Resident #70, ensure the consultant pharmacist's recommendations to change an order for analgesic medication to avoid exceeding the maximum recommended daily dose were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility: 1. Failed to ensure 1 of 4 kitchenettes was maintained in a sanitary manner to prevent potential illness or contamination of food; and 2. Failed to ensure the snack cart on the M2 Unit was maintained in a sanitary manner to prevent potential illness or contamination of food while serving snacks to residents. Findings include: Review of the 2013 Food Code, a model for safeguarding public health and ensuring food is safe for consumption, for Massachusetts indicated: 6-501.111 Controlling Pests: Insects and other pests are capable of transmitting disease to humans by contaminating food and food-contact surfaces. 4-903.11 Storing Equipment, Utensils, Linens, and Single-Service and Single-Use Articles: Clean equipment and multiuse utensils which have been cleaned and sanitized, laundered linens, and single-service and single-use articles can become contaminated before their intended use in a variety of ways such as through water leakage, pest infestation, or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-03 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement presented to residents in the admission packet included the required information for two Residents (#31 and #96), out of a sample of three records reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's admission packet, Attachment M Arbitration Agreement, dated 9/2017, did not contain the following required information: 1. The agreement must explicitly grant the resident or his or her representative the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing it. 2. The agreement must explicitly state that neither the resident nor his or her representative is required to sign an agreement for binding arbitration as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at, the facility. Review of the facility's admission folder for three sampled residents indicated the arbitration agreement they signed did not have the required information (listed above) as follows: -Resident #31 signed the arbitration agreement on 11/4/20. -Resident #60 signed the arbitration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that laundry room personnel performed hand hygiene after handling soiled linens and wore appropriate personal protective equipment when handling soiled linens. Findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Appendix D, Best Practices for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Laundry Staff: -Practice hand hygiene before application and after removal of PPE. -Wear tear-resistant reusable rubber gloves when handling and laundering soiled linens. On 6/30/23 at 11:00 A.M., the surveyor observed Employee #2 in the laundry room wearing thick, black, reusable gloves, a reusable gown, and a face mask, loading linen soiled with feces into the middle washing machine. After loading the soiled linen into the machine, Employee #2 was observed pushing the soiled laundry bin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program on one (M2 Unit) of four units reviewed. Findings include: During an interview on 6/27/23 at 11:19 A.M., Resident #31 said there is still a pest control problem with cockroaches in the kitchenette and mice running around at night. He/she said you can even hear them in the ceilings at night. The surveyor observed mice droppings behind the dressers, along the walls and in the closet behind the piles of plastic bags. In the bathroom, the surveyor observed a hole at the base of the door jamb stuffed with paper towels. Resident #31 said his/her roommate stuffs the mouse holes with paper towels to try to stop the mice from coming into their room. Review of the Pest Control provider's logbook for the M2 Unit indicated continued pest sightings including cockroaches and mice on the following dates: -undated sheet of paper indicated night shift Monday-Wednesday-Friday, M 2 kitchen and nurses' station, mice sightings in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#11) had running hot and cold water in their bathroom, out of a total sample of 29 residents. Findings include: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in November 2011 with diagnoses which included seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury, and depression. During an interview on 6/29/23 at 12:08 P.M., Resident #11 said he/she has not had running water in his/her bathroom for months. Resident #11 said he/she has asked the nurses and the certified nursing assistants (CNA) if they could get his/her sink fixed for months. The Resident said it is driving him/her nuts; he/she can't wash his/her hands after going to the bathroom. On 6/29/23 at 12:09 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #11's bathroom sink in his/her room, and found the sink had no handles on the hot or cold water stems. The surveyor attempted to turn on the hot and cold water by turning the stem controls and was unable to. The surveyor did not observe any hand sanitizer in the bathroom. During an interview on 6/29/23 at 12:12 P.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-03 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed for one Resident (#51), out of four residents with restraints, from a total sample of 29 residents, to ensure a pelvic restraint was used for the least amount of time as required. Findings include: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in April 2021 with diagnoses including Huntington's disease (condition that leads to progressive degeneration of nerve cells in the brain that affects movement, cognitive functions, and emotions). Review of the 5/25/23 Minimum Data Set assessment indicated Resident #51 had impairment in both short and long-term memory, had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, and had bed rails that were identified as a restraint. Review of a Physical Restraint Initial Evaluation, signed as completed on 5/18/23, indicated the Resident's safety is impacted by his/her uncontrolled movements and needs the pelvic restraint or constant supervision or will end up on the floor. Rehab to evaluate and treat as indicated.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's abuse policy for one Resident (#58), of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of mistreatment by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was reported, thoroughly investigated, and action was taken to protect the Resident pending the outcome of the investigation. Findings include: Review of the facility's policies titled Abuse Identification and Reporting, dated 11/2017 and Abuse: Investigation, dated 12/2017, indicated but was not limited to: - Each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of their property. - Abuse: the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical hurt or pain or mental anguish to a resident. - All alleged violations are thoroughly investigated and must prevent further potential abuse while the investigation is in process. -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse by one Resident (#58) was reported to the Department of Public Health's (DPH) Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS) within the required two hour time frame, out of a total sample of 29 residents. Findings include: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses including a seizure disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #58 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15. Review of the grievance log and grievance investigations from January 2023 to July 2023 indicated the following grievance was logged onto the monthly log reports: A 2/17/23 grievance form indicated Resident #58's [family member] left a voicemail for the Administrator reporting improper treatment of the Resident by staff and it needs to stop. The investigation indicated Resident #58 was interviewed and reported that staff are meanies and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5 intentionally kicks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for one Resident (#58), of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 2/17/23, was thoroughly investigated and protected the Resident pending the outcome of the investigation. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Identification and Reporting, dated 11/2017, indicated but was not limited to: - Each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of their property. - Abuse: the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical hurt or pain or mental anguish to a resident. - Any suspected allegation of abuse shall be immediately reported to the Executive Director or his/her designee. - All alleged violations are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Risk for Falls care plan was individualized with appropriate interventions after a fall for one Resident (#84), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Findings include: Resident #84 was admitted to the facility in December 2018 with diagnoses which included seizures, traumatic brain injury, and dementia. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #84 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15. The Resident had three falls from April 2023 to June 2023. Review of the facility's policy titled Assessing Falls and Their Causes, revised January 2018, included but was not limited to: -Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident -When a resident falls, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: Appropriate interventions to prevent future falls Review of a Nursing Note, dated 6/18/23, indicated Resident #84 was lying on the floor at bedside. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed for one Resident (#16) to provide an ongoing activity program to meet and support the individual preferences of the Resident, out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's television (TV) was functioning so the Resident could watch their preferred show. Findings include: Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including schizophrenia and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/01/22, indicated Resident #16 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. The MDS indicated Resident #16 was able to independently turn the television to the program of his/her choice. Review of the Activities Care Plan indicated but was not limited to the following: Focus: Attend activities of interest/choice and engages in self-initiated leisure activities Goals: Will initiate leisure activities one to two times a day such as visiting with family/friends, talks to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care and treatment of residents with catheters was provided per standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to position catheter bags off the floor to prevent the risk for infection for one Resident (#29), out of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) website indicated drainage bags should be always kept below the level of the bladder and off the floor to avoid the risk of infection (March 2017). Resident #29 was readmitted to the facility in May 2023 with diagnoses including retention of urine, unspecified. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/1/23, indicated that the Resident is cognitively competent and requires extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #29's Clinical Record indicated the use of an indwelling urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted to the bladder to drain urine). Review of the Physician's Orders, dated June 2023, included an order to change CD [catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and maintenance of oxygen administration equipment was provided for one Resident (#33), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Findings include: World Health Organization: Care, cleaning and disinfection of oxygen concentrators Checklist (2022) -Inspect and clean air intake filter (1-2 times per week) 1. Pull the filter gently out and replace with spare one. 2. Put the filter in cool, soapy water and swirl gently to remove debris. 3. Remove from soapy water and place it in [NAME] area until completely dry. 4. Store the spare filter until next cleaning is needed. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility in October 2012 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease which blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe). Review of the medical record indicated the following current Physician's Order: -Change oxygen tubing every week on Thursday 11:00 P.M. - 7:00 A.M. shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident's (#13) medication regime was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, in a sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (prn) medication order for Klonopin (anticonvulsant used as adjunct therapy for psychosis) was limited to 14 days, then evaluated by the physician as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, last revised 11/2017, included but was not limited to: -Residents will not receive prn doses of psychotropic medications unless that medication is necessary to treat specific conditions that is documented in the clinical record -The need to continue prn orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rationale for the extended order. The duration of the prn order will be indicated in the order. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses including delusional disorder. Review of the 6/10/23 Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly stored and labeled in accordance with current accepted professional standards in 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, revised August 2020, indicated but was not limited to the following: Expiration Dating (Beyond-Use Date): -Certain medications or package types, such as Intravenous (IV) solutions, multiple dose injectable vials, ophthalmics, nitroglycerin tablets, and blood sugar testing solution strips require an expiration date once opened to ensure medication purity and potency. -When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated. -The Nurse shall place a date opened sticker on the medication and record the date opened and the new date of expiration. -The expiration date of the vial or container will be 30 days from opening, unless the manufacturer recommends another date or regulations/guidelines require different dating. -If…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-03 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to include and identify the Home Health Aide (HHA) role of care between the facility and the hospice provider, in the person-centered hospice care plan for one Resident (#22), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Findings include: Review of the contract agreement between the facility and the consultant Hospice provider, signed as effective 3/3/23, indicated but was not limited to: Responsibilities of the Nursing Facility: -In accordance with applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, Hospice and Facility shall comply with the General Terms and Conditions as part of this Agreement. Nursing Facility shall consult with Hospice regarding the development and/or modification of a Plan of Care for each eligible resident. -The Plan of Care must identify the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-11 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information which included the current date and actual hours worked per shift for licensed and unlicensed staff including Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA), and the resident census was posted daily as required.Findings include:On 12/3/25 at 8:58 A.M., the surveyor did not observe any nurse staffing posting in the lobby, hallways or nursing units.On 12/4/25 at 9:22 A.M., the surveyor did not observe any nurse staffing posting in the lobby, hallways or nursing units.On 12/8/25 at 8:12 A.M., the surveyor did not observe any nurse staffing posting in the lobby, hallways or nursing units.On 12/9/25 at 9:39 A.M., the surveyor did not observe any nurse staffing posting in the lobby, hallways or nursing units.On 12/10/25 at 8:35 A.M., the surveyor did not observe any nurse staffing posting in the lobby, hallways or nursing units.During an interview on 12/10/25 at 12:01 P.M., the Scheduler said she has been managing the nursing schedule for the facility for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-09-26 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed for one Resident (#106), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed for Resident #106, to accurately code the use of anticoagulant (blood thinner to prevent blood clots) and antiplatelet (stops platelets from clumping together and forming blood clots) medications on 11 out of 11 MDS assessments reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessment Instrument, dated September 2021, indicated but was not limited to the following: -This assessment will provide a comprehensive, accurate, standardized, reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacities and assist staff to identify health problems for care plan development. -Completion of the MDS: The assessment must include at least the following: N: Medications. -The assessment will accurately reflect the resident's status. Resident #106 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses which included myocardial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-07-03 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that for one Resident (#29), out of a total sample of 29 residents, who was transferred to an acute care facility on two occasions that the Resident, and/or representative were provided with a Discharge/Transfer Notice upon transfer. Findings include: Resident #29 was admitted in May 2020 with diagnoses including diabetes, end stage renal disease, hypertensive chronic kidney with stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end stage. Review of the Order Summary Details indicated that on 2/6/23 Resident #29 was transferred to the Hospital emergency room for evaluation, and on 3/27/23 the Resident was transferred to the Hospital emergency room for further evaluation. Further record review indicated that there was no evidence that a Discharge/Transfer Notice was provided to the Resident and/or the family. During an interview on 7/3/23 at 1:57 P.M., Unit Manager #1 said the Discharge/Transfer Notices were not completed on 2/6/23 and 3/27/23. Unit Manager #1 said the two missing discharge/transfer notices should have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,648 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $11,196 — penalty dated 2025-06-26
- $16,452 — penalty dated 2024-09-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRAINTREE OPCO, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2024 |
| HAGAR, CHAIM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2024 |
| NACHFOLGER, ISRAEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2024 |
| ROSENFELD, BARUCH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2024 |
| SCHWARTZ, ELIEZER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2024 |
| STEIN, ALLEN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2024 |
| GAUTHIER, SUZANNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/23/2025 |
| NOBLE, DOUGLAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/01/2024 |
| OSTREM, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/23/2025 |
| AMCHA BRAINTREE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $882K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225445. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.