Sunny Acres Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 265 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 116 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 78.1 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services relative to an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine outside the body) for one Resident (#32) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, for Resident #32, the facility staff failed to follow the Physician order's relative to the foley (type of indwelling urinary catheter) catheter size, increasing the Resident's risk for indwelling urinary catheter complications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Changing Foley Catheter, revised May 2020, indicated the following: -the Foley catheter will be changed only when needed, unless otherwise specified by the Physician, Nurse Practitioner (NP) or Physician Assistant (PA). -Foley catheters should be changed when: <urinary tract infection is suspected <clogged or unable to irrigate <displaced (balloon [retention balloon- a tiny balloon at the end of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored in a safe and secure manner for one unit (Unit 1) out of a total of two units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that six over-the-counter medications were not stored in an unlocked drawer at the nurses station where the medications were readily accessible to unauthorized individuals and were at risk for improper temperature, humidity, and light controls. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage indicated the following: -The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. -Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing medications and biologicals are locked when not in use . On 5/6/25 at 8:37 A.M., the surveyor observed Unit Manager (UM) #1 open an unlocked drawer at the nurses station on Unit 1 where the following medications were observed to be stored in the drawer: -one bottle of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to administer Pneumococcal Vaccinations for one Resident (#44) of five applicable residents, out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, for Resident #44, the facility failed to administer Pneumococcal Vaccines when the Resident was eligible to receive, and consented to, the Pneumococcal immunization, putting the Resident at risk of acquiring pneumococcal illnesses. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Pneumococcal Vaccine, undated, indicated the following: -Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, are offered the vaccine series within thirty days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated. -Pneumococcal vaccines are administered to residents (unless medically contraindicated, already given, or refused) per our facility's physician approved pneumococcal vaccination…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to honor the rights of two Residents (#33 and #49) out of a total sample of 18 residents, to formulate Advanced Directives (an individual's wishes regarding medical treatment). Specifically, 1. For Resident #33, the facility staff executed a Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST - a medical order form that converts an individual's wishes regarding life-sustaining treatment into medical orders) form that was signed by the Residents' Health Care Proxy (HCP- the person chosen as the healthcare decision maker when the individual is unable to do so for themself) when the Resident continued to be capable of making his/her own health care decisions. 2. For Resident #49, the facility staff executed a MOLST form that was signed by the HCP, which should have been signed by the Resident because the Resident's HCP was not invoked (put into effect - evaluation of capacity by a Physician indicating that a resident is unable to make medical decisions) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#56 and #58) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1. off-load (minimizing or removing weight placed on the foot to help prevent and heal ulcers) Resident #58's heels when the Resident was in bed, had been identified as being at risk for skin breakdown, and had an active Physician's order to off-load his/her heels when in bed, increasing the Resident's risk for developing a pressure injury (PI: meaning an area of damage to skin or underlying soft tissue, usually over a bony prominence, as a result of prolonged pressure). 2. follow the Physician's order for Resident #56 not to exceed three grams (3 g: 3,000 milligrams [mg]) of Acetaminophen administration in a 24-hour period when facility staff administered 3,650 mg of Acetaminophen to the Resident in one 24-hour period. Findings include: 1. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide treatments in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#64) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to manage hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) episodes as required and implement and perform care and treatment consistent with the Physician orders and professional standards of practice for a Resident with Diabetes Type 1 (DM I - a chronic autoimmune disease that prevents the pancreas from making insulin), when the Resident's blood glucose levels decreased to less than 70 mg/dL on multiple occasions. Findings include: Resident #64 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with diagnoses including Diabetes Type 1 and hypoglycemia. Review of the facility policy titled Nursing Care of the Older Adult with Diabetes Mellitus, undated, indicated the following: -the Provider will order the frequency of glucose monitoring and establish appropriate glycemic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required, placing all residents at risk for not having their clinical needs met either directly by the RN or indirectly by the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) or Certified Nurses Aides (CNA) that the RN was responsible for overseeing with provision of resident care. Specifically, review of the facility's Licensed Nurses schedule and interviews indicated that the facility failed to have an RN working at least eight consecutive hours over a 24-hour period for four days between 5/26/24 - 6/22/24, when no nursing staff waivers were in place. Findings include: Review of the Nursing Staff Schedule provided by the facility dated 5/26/24 - 6/8/24, indicated no evidence of any RN coverage in the facility on 6/1/24, 6/2/24, and 6/8/24. Further Review of the Nursing Staff Schedule dated 6/9/24 - 6/22/24, indicated there was no evidence of any RN coverage in the facility on 6/16/24. During an interview for the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to implement Contact Precautions (use of gloves and a gown for all interactions with a resident and their environment) to prevent the potential transmission of communicable diseases (a disease or infection that is easily spread from one individual to another) and infections within the facility for two Residents (#49 and #58), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specially, the facility failed to: 1) For Resident #49, ensure that staff: -wore the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - items used to prevent the spread of infection such as gowns, gloves, face masks) while caring for the Resident with Clostridium difficile (C. diff- a bacterium that causes an infection of the colon [the longest part of the large intestine]. Symptoms can range from diarrhea to life-threatening damage to the colon) and Contact Precautions were indicated. -performed the appropriate hand hygiene (hand washing with soap and water) for C. diff after exiting the Resident's room. 2) For Resident #58, ensure that staff:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-02-27 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff designated an Infection Preventionist (IP) who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control prior to assuming the role of IP at the facility. Specifically, the facility designated an IP in November 2022 who had not completed specialized training in infection prevention and control before assuming the IP role, still had not completed the specialized training by the time survey began in February 2023 and continued to work as the designated IP at the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 2/22/23 at 7:52 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) said the facility's designated IP had not yet completed specialized training in infection prevention and control as required. During an interview on 2/24/23 at 11:07 A.M., the IP said she started working at the facility in November 2022, was designated as the facility's IP at that time, and that she continued to work in that role. The IP said she had not completed specialized training in infection prevention and control prior to starting at the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained a clean and sanitary environment in the kitchen where food items were stored for resident consumption. The facility also failed to ensure its staff adhered to food storage requirements in the kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its staff: 1) labeled and dated all open food stored for resident consumption, in the kitchen's reach-in refrigerator and freezer, 2) kept scoops from directly touching the ice and rice, 3) maintained a sanitary surface where clean dishes and pans were stored, and 4) maintained the microwave to be free of dried food and debris. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Food Use and Storage, dated 10/2022, indicated the following: It is the policy of the facility to provide safe and sanitary storage of all foods. The food service workers, cooks, dietary aides, dishwashers, food prep aides, and any person working in the kitchen is responsible to adhere to the food safety requirements. -Leftovers should be labeled, dated, and used…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $548K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA