Chicopee Rehabilitation And Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 146 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 63.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing as being at an increased risk for falls and who required assistance of two staff members with the use of a mechanical lift for safe transfers, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed interventions from his/her plan of care related to his/her individual care needs related to transfers. On 09/04/23 during the day shift, a Certified Nurse Aide transferred Resident #1 out of bed, alone, and without a mechanical lift, resulting in him/her being lowered to the floor. Resident #1 complained of right hip pain a few hours after the incident, an order for an x-ray was obtained, Resident #1 was diagnosed with a right proximal tibia and fibula (lower leg bones) fractures and was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation and further treatment. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Falls and Fall Risk-Managing, dated as revised March 2018, indicated based on previous evaluations and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing as being at an increased risk for falls, and who required extensive assistance from two staff members with the use of a mechanical lift during transfers, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance and assistive device during a transfer to maintain his/her safety in an effort to prevent an incident and/or accident resulting in an injury. On 09/04/23, during the day shift, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 attempted to transfer Resident #1 without a mechanical lift and without a second staff member present to assist her, Resident #1's knees buckled, and she lowered him/her to the floor. Resident #1 complained of right hip pain a few hours after the incident, an order for an x-ray was obtained, Resident #1 was diagnosed with a right proximal tibia and fibula (lower leg bones) fractures and was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Physician Assistant (PA) of changes in condition for two Residents (#35 and #58) out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #35, notify the Physician/ PA timely of significant weight loss experienced by the Resident. 2. For Resident #58, ensure the Physician/PA was notified when the Resident had a significant weight change and continued significant weight decline. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Change In a Resident's Condition or Status, revised February 2011, indicated the following: -The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a (an): ---Significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition, ---Refusal of treatment or medications two (2) or more consecutive times. Review of the facility policy titled Weighing and Measuring the Resident, revised March 2011, indicated the following: a. one month 5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set [MDS] Assessments (SCSA) was completed for one Resident (#54) out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, for Resident #54, the facility failed to ensure that a SCSA was completed when the Resident had a decline in activities of daily living (ADLs) and developed a new pressure ulcer. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Assessment, revised March 2022, indicated the following: -the SCSA is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed when the IDT (interdisciplinary team) has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline. Resident #54 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses including Dementia and an intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur. Review of Resident #54's MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated: -the Resident required supervision for oral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice relative to administering medication for one Resident (#42) out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, for Resident #42, the facility failed to ensure that prescribed Insulin (medication used to treat diabetes) was administered within one hour before or one hour after the ordered time. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, revised April 2019, indicated the following: -Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders). Resident #42 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes. Review of the Physician's Order Recap Report, from 1/14/25 through 2/28/25, indicated: -Lantus SoloStar Subcutaneous Solution 100 unit/milliliter (ml) (Insulin Glargine), Inject 18 units subcutaneously at bedtime (8:30 PM) with a start date of 1/23/25 and end date of 2/6/25. -Lantus SoloStar Subcutaneous Solution 100…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one Resident (#35) out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, for Resident #35, the facility failed to address significant weight loss and implement nutritional interventions when the Resident was identified to have greater than 10 percent (%) weight loss. Findings include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses including Diabetes, small cell lung carcinoma (lung cancer) receiving chemotherapy, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), C-Diff (Clostridium Difficile,) Chronic Kidney Disease, anxiety and depression. Review of the facility policy titled Weighing and Measuring the Resident, revised March 2011 indicated the following: a. one month 5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is severe. b. three months 7.5% weight loss is significant; greater than 7.5 is severe c. six months 10% weight loss is significant; greater than 10% is severe.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist during a monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) were reviewed by the Physician as required for one Resident (#214), of five applicable residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: Resident #214 was admitted to the facility in December 2023 with diagnoses including Vascular Dementia. Review of Resident #214's Pharmacist Progress Notes indicated the following: -10/4/24: the Pharmacist indicated recommendations made, see Clinical Pharmacy Report -11/5/24: the Pharmacist indicated recommendations made, see Clinical Pharmacy Report Review of Resident #214's medical record did not provide evidence of the Pharmacy Recommendations and Clinical Pharmacy Reports indicated in the Pharmacist Progress Notes on 10/4/24 and 11/5/24. Further review of the medical record failed to indicate that the Physician had reviewed the 10/4/24 and 11/5/24 Pharmacy Recommendations. During an interview on 2/14/25 at 10:05 A.M.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide continuity of care related to Hospice Services for one Resident (#42) out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, for Resident #42, the facility failed to: -designate a member of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) responsible for working with Hospice Representatives to coordinate care provided by the facility staff and Hospice staff. -obtain the most recent Hospice Plan of Care and ensure that it was readily available. Findings include: Review of the Hospice Nursing Facility Services Agreement dated May 31, 2023, indicated: -Nursing facility and Hospice shall develop procedures regarding communications and the documentation of such communications to ensure that the needs of the patient are addressed and met 24 hours a day. -Hospice will supply the facility a copy of the patient's plan of care which will specify the inpatient services to be provided. -The facility will have patient care policies consistent with those of hospice and agrees to abide by the palliative care protocols and plan of care established…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that infection control practices were implemented to prevent the spread of infection on two Units (North Unit and [NAME] Unit) of two units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #164 who resided on the North Unit, ensure that staff utilized proper Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - set of infection control practices that uses Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) such as gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug resistant organism to residents who are at risk due to having a wound or indwelling medical device). 2. For Resident #35 who resided on the North Unit, ensure that staff utilized proper Contact Precautions (set of infection control practices that are used when a resident is diagnosed with a condition that can spread from person to person by touch or by direct contact with contaminated objects and surfaces) when entering the Resident's room. 3. For Resident #54 who resided on the [NAME]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that patient care equipment was maintained in a safe operating condition for one Resident (#3) out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, for Resident #3, the facility failed to ensure that his/her wheelchair was maintained in safe condition when the left cushioned armrest of the Resident's wheelchair was missing leaving a metal bar and exposed screw and placing the Resident at risk of injury. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarct (Stroke) and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated: -the Resident had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9 out of a total possible score of 15 -the Resident was dependent for transfers to and from the chair During an observation on 2/12/25 at 2:00 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #3 sitting up in his/her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1a. Ensure kitchen cleanliness and store and prepare food in the main kitchen area in a manner that would prevent contamination and food-borne illnesses. 1b. Ensure food was stored in a manner to prevent food-borne illnesses in two out of two unit-based kitchen areas. 2. Ensure that a process was in place to safely reheat food and beverages for the residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled; Cleaning Schedule from the Dietary Services Manual dated 6/10/20 indicated the following: -It is the responsibility of the Dietary Department to maintain all areas of the facility's kitchen and related areas in a clean and sanitary manner. -The Food Service Director (FSD) is responsible to identify, assign, monitor and manage the cleanliness of their department. -Cleaning schedules should be unique to each Dietary Department based on specific,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident environment that was free from potential hazards on one Unit (North Unit) out of two Units observed. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that smoking materials were stored in a secured location, that was out of sight and not accessible to the residents. Findings include: On 2/27/24 between 8:00 A.M. and 9:13 A.M., the surveyor observed a box containing smoking materials (several packages of cigarettes and two lighters) sitting on top of a medication storage cart that was located next to the nursing station. The surveyor also observed that the smoking materials on the medication storage cart were visible and accessible to four residents who were congregated in the immediate area near the medication storage cart. During an interview on 2/27/24 at 8:45 A.M., Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) #1 said the resident smoking materials were stored in a box and kept on top of the medication storage cart near the nursing station. CNA #1 further said staff used to keep the smoking materials in the locked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$7,901 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $7,901 — penalty dated 2023-09-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA