Twin Oaks Center
63 Locust Street, Danvers, MA 01923 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 101 certified beds · (978) 777-0011 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $2,186 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-11)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.0% | 16.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.2% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 38.8% | 15.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.3% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.6% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.8% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.9% | 21.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 41.7% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 34.6% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.7% | 11.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.09 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.84 | 1.50 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
29.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 29.2%CMS range 17.2–42.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 7.1–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 25.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 30.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 20.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.1%CMS range 5.0–15.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.15 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 75.0 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to adequately maintain the nutrition and hydration status of one Resident (#37) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide adequate hydration for a Resident who requires assistance to full dependence for eating and drinking, resulting in a hospitalization due to dehydration, an acute kidney injury, and hypernatremia. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Hydration and Prevention of Dehydration, dated 1/22/2015, indicated the following: -This facility will endeavor to provide adequate hydration and to prevent and treat dehydration. -Nursing will assess for signs and symptoms of dehydration as needed and notify the provider to determine needs for hydration. -If potential inadequate intake and/or signs and symptoms of dehydration are observed, dehydration protocol will be initiated and documented. Provider will be notify [sic] for further interventions. -Orders may be written for extra fluids…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-07-11 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promptly notify the physician/ nurse practitioner (NP) of a critically high sodium lab for one Resident (#37), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Hydration and Prevention of Dehydration, dated 1/22/2015, indicated the following: - This facility will endeavor to provide adequate hydration and to prevent and treat dehydration. - Nursing will assess for signs and symptoms of dehydration as needed and notify the provider to determine needs for hydration. - If potential inadequate intake and/or signs and symptoms of dehydration are observed, dehydration protocol will be initiated and documented . Provider will be notify [sic] for further interventions. - Orders may be written for extra fluids to be encouraged between meals and/or with medication passes. - If nursing assessment indicates significant signs and symptoms of dehydration, labs may be ordered as needed. Review of the Laboratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2023-05-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 2 Residents (#40 and #370), were free of significant medication errors. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) implement necessary action when daily administration of Clozapine (an antipsychotic) was ordered by the Physician/NP and was omitted from Resident #40's medication administration for six consecutive days resulting in hospitalization. 2) administer a medication used to treat schizoaffective disorder, resulting in Resident #370 having an increase in symptoms of psychosis and distress. Findings include: 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in October 2018 with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and diabetes. Review of the manufacture's Clozapine (an atypical antipsychotic used in treatment-resistant schizophrenia) safety information packet indicated that the medication can cause severe Neutropenia (low white blood cell count) which could lead to life threatening infections, so an ANC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-05-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to 1. ensure that one Resident (#18) received adequate assistance to prevent an injury, and 2. failed to provide supervision for 1 Resident (#31) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, on 4/22/23, Resident #18 was transferred out of a bed that was elevated too high and prevented his/her feet to reach the floor. As a result, Resident #18 lost his/her footing and hit his/her left leg on his/her wheelchair and sustained a laceration that required sutures. Specifically, on 4/18/23, supervision was not provided to Resident #31, resulting in Resident #31 entering another resident's room, being screamed at, and falling as he/she exited the room, resulting in an injury and emergency room visit. Findings include: 1. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in January 2022 with a diagnoses including venous insufficiency, muscle weakness, abnormalities of the gait and mobility, dysphagia, anxiety, legal blindness and lack of coordination.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it provided appropriate administrative oversight in a manner that enabled the facility to use its resources effectively to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility administration failed to ensure pre-employment health requirements and dementia training was provided to all staff to provide competent, safe, and effective resident care as well as ensuring the governance and leadership members sustain a sufficient Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program during transitions in leadership and staffing. Specifically, the facility administration failed to: 1. Ensure effective systems were in place for education, and training for licensed staff to ensure competent, and safe practice. 2. Establish and maintain an IPCP (Infection Prevention Control Program) designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent development and transmission of disease and infection. 3. Develop an Antibiotic Stewardship program…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-18 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the governing body provided oversight and accountability for: 1. The maintenance of an effective QAPI program. 2. The provision of an infection control/antibiotic stewardship program. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Quality assurance Performance Improvement Plan, dated January 2025, indicated that the Administrator has responsibility and is accountable to the governing body for ensuring that QAPI is implemented throughout our facility. QAPI activities and discussion will be a standing item on our governing body board meeting agendas. During the survey period the surveyor requested the infection control program information for tracking infections, including line listings, reporting data and antibiotic stewardship. The facility failed to have any documented information related to tracking and reporting of infections or antibiotic stewardship in the facility. Review of the QAPI program failed to indicate that a QAPI had been initiated for the implementation of the infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement and maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program which addressed the full range of care and services, was comprehensive and data-driven, and focused on indicators of outcomes of quality of life, quality of care, and services to residents in the facility. Specifically, the facility developed QAPI plans related to staff education and infection control once these concerns were identified by the Administrator. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, dated January 2025, indicated the following: -Purpose: To ensure the delivery of the highest standard of care and services to our residents. Our QAPI program is designed to monitor, assess, and continuously improve all aspects of care and operations, addressing areas for improvement proactively, and ensuring that quality outcomes are consistently achieved. - Program Overview: The QAPI program is comprehensive, facility-wide, data-driven approach aimed at identifying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance Committee met quarterly, identified quality deficient areas to develop and implement an appropriate corrective action plan, to ensure satisfactory outcomes. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, dated January 2025, indicated the following: -Purpose: To ensure the delivery of the highest standard of care and services to our residents. Our QAPI program is designed to monitor, assess, and continuously improve all aspects of care and operations, addressing areas for improvement proactively, and ensuring that quality outcomes are consistently achieved. - Program Overview: The QAPI program is comprehensive, facility-wide, data-driven approach aimed at identifying and addressing quality gaps in clinical care, resident safety, patient satisfaction, operational efficiency, and regulatory compliance. Our program aligns with the Centers for Medicare &…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to implement an infection control surveillance plan for identifying, tracking, monitoring and/or reporting of infections, communicable diseases and outbreaks among residents and staff. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Surveillance for Infections', dated as revised September 2017, indicated the following: -The infection preventionist (IP) will conduct ongoing surveillance for healthcare-associated infections (HAI's) and other epidemiologically significant infections that have substantial impact on potential resident outcomes and that may require transmission-based precautions and other preventative interventions. 1. The purpose of the surveillance of infections…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program to promote and monitor the appropriate use of antibiotics. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, undated, indicated the following: -Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. -The purpose of our Antibiotics Stewardship Program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. -Orientation, training and education of staff will emphasize the importance of Antibiotic Stewardship and will include how appropriate use of antibiotics affects individual residents and the overall community. -Training and education will include emphasis on the relationship between antibiotic use and: a. Gastrointestinal disorders. b. Opportunistic infections (e.g., C. difficile, candida albicans, etc.). c. Medication interactions; and d. The evolution of drug-resistant pathogens. During the survey period the surveyor requested infection control line listings and antibiotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1.) a medication cart was locked when unattended, on one of three nursing units, 2.) medications were labeled, and dated once opened, according to manufacturer's guidelines on one out of three medication carts sampled, 3.) store medications at proper temperatures and other appropriate environmental controls to preserve their integrity. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated as revised April 2007, indicated: The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. -Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes.) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. -Only a person authorized to prepare and administer medications shall have access to the medication room, including keys. -Medication requiring refrigeration must be stored in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience on one out of three units. Specifically on the 1st floor unit, dining room staff failed to provide dignified dining experience and referred to residents as feeders, rather than by their name. Findings include: The facility policy titled Quality of Life- Dignity, dated as revised August 2009, indicated the following: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality. - Staff shall speak respectfully to residents at all times, including addressing the resident by his or her name of choice and not labeling or referring to the resident by his or her room number, diagnosis, or care needs. On 6/17/25 beginning at 12:28 P.M., the surveyor made the following observations on the first floor unit: -At 12:41 P.M., a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) walked into the dining room, gestured at a resident across the room and asked Nurse #1 if the resident was a feeder. Nurse #1 responded yes and failed to inform the CNA that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to 1.) report a fall, resulting in a head laceration requiring staples and, 2.) report a fall, resulting in a fracture of the right femoral neck (right thigh bone) requiring surgery, to the state agency as required for one Resident (#42), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting with a revision date of July 2017 indicated the following: -All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported. -All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered behavior care plan for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for a history of chronic paranoia and delusions. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring' with a revision date of December 2016 indicated the following: -Behavior is the response of an individual to a wide variety of factors. These factors may include medical, physical, functional, psychosocial, emotional, psychiatric, or environmental causes. -As part of the initial assessment, the nursing staff and attending physician will identify individuals with a history of impaired cognition, altered behavior, or mental illness (e.g., bipolar disorder or schizophrenia). -As part of the comprehensive assessment, staff will evaluate, based on input from the resident, family and caregivers, review of medical record and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide Nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice for two Residents #24 and #11 out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically; 1. For Resident # 24, the facility failed to include how much oxygen the Resident should be taking via nasal cannula, and how often the oxygen tubing should be changed in the physician's orders. 2. For Resident #11, the facility failed to implement a physician's order to administer tube feeding with correct enteral feeding and correct rate. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Oxygen Administration' indicated the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. -Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. A Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#56) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically; the facility failed to change a wound dressing for three days. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dressings, Dry/Clean dated revised September 2013, failed to indicate to follow a physician's order. Resident #56 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, anxiety and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #56 scored an 11 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, indicating moderately impaired cognition. On 6/16/25 at 8:10 A.M. the surveyors observed Resident #56 sitting on the edge of the bed. The surveyors then observed a soiled dressing on Resident #56's right ankle covering half the open wound and exposing the other half. The surveyors also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide range of motion (ROM) care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#11) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented Resident #11's, physician ordered, rolled facecloth to contracted [left] hand every shift. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Resident Mobility and Range of Motion', revised July 2017, indicated: - Residents will not experience an avoidable reduction in range of motion (ROM). - Residents with limited ROM will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM. - Residents with limited mobility will receive appropriate services, equipment and assistance to maintain or improve mobility unless a reduction in mobility is unavoidable. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in March 2021 with diagnoses including contracture, unspecified joint. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/25/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to adequately maintain the nutrition and hydration status of one Resident (#1) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, for Resident #1 the facility failed to ensure significant weigh loss was assessed and continually monitored. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Weighing and Measuring the Resident, dated as revised March 2011, indicated the following: -The purposes of this procedure are to determine the resident's weight and height, to provide a baseline and an ongoing record of the resident's body weight as an indicator of the nutritional status and medical condition of the resident, and to provide a baseline height in order to determine the ideal weight of the resident. -Reporting: 1. Report significant weight loss/weight gain to the nurse supervisor. 2. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss/gain will be based on the following criteria. a. 1 month- 5% loss is significant;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a trauma informed care plan for two Residents #10 and #1 out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #10, the facility failed to develop a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) care plan addressing the needs of trauma by minimizing triggers and re-traumatization. 2. For Resident #1, the facility failed to develop a care plan addressing PTSD with a history of suicide attempt. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Trauma Informed Care' with no revision date indicated the following: -Trauma informed care is an approach to delivering care that involves understanding, recognizing and responding to the effects of all types of traumas. A trauma-informed approach to care delivery recognizes the widespread impact and signs and symptoms of trauma in residents, and incorporates knowledge about trauma into care plans, policies, procedures and practices to avoid re-traumatization. -The facility will identify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent. Specifically, one of two nurses observed made two errors in 33 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 6.06%. These errors impacted one Resident (#18) out of four residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors dated as revised April 2014 indicated the following: -A medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological's which is not in accordance with physician orders, manufacturer specifications, or accepted professional standards and principles of the professional(s) providing services. For Resident #18 the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician. Review of the current doctor's orders indicated an order for the following: 1. Lactose Fast Acting Relief Oral Tablet (Lactase) Give 2 tablets by mouth before meals for lactose intolerance. Start Date 6/13/25. 2. Saline Spray Nasal Solution…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to accurately document in the medical record for one Resident (#56 ) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, for Resident #56 the facility documented a dressing change was completed for three days when it was not. Findings include: Resident #56 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, anxiety and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #56 scored an 11 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, indicating moderately impaired cognition. On 6/16/25 at 8:10 A.M. two surveyors observed Resident #56 sitting on the edge of the bed. The surveyors then observed a soiled dressing on Resident #56's right ankle covering half the open wound and exposing the other half. The surveyors also observed that the dressing was dated 6/12/25. On 6/16/25 at 12:50 P.M. the surveyor and Nurse #1 observed Resident #56 sitting on the edge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to offer the Influenza vaccine during influenza season to one Resident out of a sample of five residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to offer Influenza vaccination on admission to the facility or during their stay at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled 'Influenza Vaccine', undated, indicated the following: -All residents and employees who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza. -Between October 1st and March 31st each year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents and employees, unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated or the resident or employee has already been immunized. A review of five resident medical records indicated one out of the five residents had not been vaccinated for Influenza. During an interview on 6/17/25 at 11:37 A.M. the Director of Nurses (DON) said she does not track vaccinations in the building…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to offer the COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease) vaccine to one out of five sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer a COVID-19 vaccination to a resident on admission to the facility or during their stay at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled 'Coronavirus Prevention and Control', dated as revised January 2023, indicated the following: -Facility leadership and clinical staff are responsible to take reasonable measures to protect the health and safety of residents and staff during the current outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). A review of five resident medical records indicated one out of the five residents had not been vaccinated for COVID-19. During an interview on 6/17/25 at 11:37 A.M. the Director of Nurses (DON) said she does not track vaccinations in the building but expects the Infection Preventionist to be tracking the vaccinations. During an interview on 6/17/25 at 11:44 A.M. the Infection Preventionist said he has only been working in the facility for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for four Residents (#55, #48, #63 and #24) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #55, #48 and #63 the facility failed to assess their hydration status, draw labs or notify the responsible party before administering intravenous (IV) hydration. 2. For Resident #24 the facility failed to obtain his/her Depakote level as ordered by the Physician. Findings include: 1. For Resident #55, the facility failed to assess his/her hydration status, draw labs or notify the responsible party before administering intravenous (IV) hydration. Resident #55 was admitted in 9/2021 with diagnoses including depression. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/9/24, indicated Resident #55 scored a 7 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated Resident #55 has an activated health care proxy in place. Review of the progress note, dated 5/3/24, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who has entrusted the facility to manage his/her Personal Needs Account (PNA), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a system of accounting that assured Resident #1 monthly PNA checks, that were received and processed by the Facility, were then deposited into the correct account, when two of Resident #1 monthly PNA checks were somehow deposited into the Facility's Operations Account, which resulted in Resident #1's account balance to be inaccurate for several months. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's Resident Statement Landscape (PNA), from 6/03/23 to 8/06/23, indicated the following: - there was no record of deposit to the account in the amount of $72.80 a month in June 2023, July 2023, and August 2023 (totaling $218.40), in PNA funds that were unaccounted for. During an interview on 12/12/23 at 11:10 A.M., Resident #1 said the Facility manages his/her Personal Needs Account (PNA) by receiving and depositing a monthly check of $72.80 into his/her PNA. Resident #1 said on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, the facility failed to ensure the building had a home-like environment on 3 of 3 nursing units evidenced by, gouged walls, various stains on the ceilings and walls, broken tiles, rusted toilet paper holders, and rusty detached baseboard covers on 3 of 3 nursing units. Findings include: During an environmental rounds on 5/2/23, and 5/3/23, the surveyor observed the following: room [ROOM NUMBER]- gouges on the wall behind bed A and B. room [ROOM NUMBER]- gouges on the wall behind bed A and B. The baseboard heating cover was detached and protruding out. room [ROOM NUMBER]- gouges on the wall behind bed A and B. room [ROOM NUMBER]- gouges on the wall behind bed A and B. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s shared bathroom had missing tiles on the wall and floor. room [ROOM NUMBER]- gouges on the wall behind bed A and B. room [ROOM NUMBER]- the shared bathroom with a rusted paper towel holder. room [ROOM NUMBER]- the shared bathroom with rusted paper towel holders. The bathroom doors were scuffed with white…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-03 · tag F0636 — widespreadAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete Comprehensive (Annual and Admission) Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments in a timely manner for 2 Residents (#59 and #33) and failed to complete a discharge MDS in a timely manner for 1 Resident (#59) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual 3.0 indicated the following: 1. An admission Data Set (MDS) assessment must be completed no later than the 14th day from admission and must be transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) no later than 35 days from the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). 2. The Annual and Quarterly MDS must be completed no later than 14 days from the ARD. 3. A discharge MDS must be completed no later than 14 days after discharge and transmitted to CMS no later than 14 days of completion of the MDS. 1. For Resident #59 review of the MDS's indicated the admission MDS had an ARD of 12/27/22, and was transmitted to CMS on 3/6/23, 80 days after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-03 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete annual Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) performance reviews for 5 of 5 sampled CNAs. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Performance Assessments and dated as last reviewed 12/2020, indicated that the Executive Director and the Director of Nursing Services and location leaders with direct reports in a job that requires annual skills evaluation, are responsible to ensure a Performance assessment related to skills is completed annually. Review of the facility document titled Evaluation Form failed to indicate that the CNA's individual skills required to perform their jobs were evaluated to ensure that nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care During review of 5 CNA employee records, the Surveyor was unable to locate annual performance reviews for all 5 CNAs. During an interview on 5/01/23, at 3:16 P.M., the DON said that a skills performance review is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review and interviews the facility failed to ensure medication carts were clean, had medications that were stored according to manufacturer's guidelines (refrigerated), and that medications once opened were dated according to manufacturer's guidelines on 3 out of 3 sampled medication carts. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, undated, indicated the facility shall store all drugs and biological's in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. - drugs and biological's shall be stored in the packaging, containers or the dispensing systems in which they are received. - nursing staff are responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. - the facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biological's. - medications requiring refrigeration must be stored in the refrigerator. Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, undated, indicated: - the expiration/beyond use date on the medication label must be checked prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enables it to use resources effectively to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Findings include: During the recertification survey conducted on 4/30/23, through 5/3/23, the survey team observed concerns with a lack of activities programming for all residents, an unclean and non-homelike environment in resident rooms and bathing areas and a lack of sufficient staffing. On 4/30/23, the survey team identified a lack of activities program for all residents living in the facility. On 4/30/23, the surveyors identified the building did not have a home-like environment on 3 of 3 nursing units evidenced by, gouged walls, various stains on the ceilings and walls, broken tiles, rusted toilet paper holders, and rusty detached baseboard covers on 3 or 3 nursing units. During an interview with 2 surveyors, on 5/01/23, at 4:31 P.M., the Director of nursing, when asked if a Certified Nurse's Aide could adequately care for 16 residents on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure they implemented and maintained an effective, comprehensive and data driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. The facility also failed to make a good faith effort to establish a quality assurance and improvement plan to maintain the quality of life and well-being for residents by failing to offer meaningful, person-centered activities and failing to maintain the building in a homelike manner. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program and dated as revised February 2020, indicated that the facility shall develop, implement and maintain an ongoing, facility wide, data driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents. Further review indicated that the QAPI plan includes tracking and measuring performance, establishing goals and thresholds for performance measurement, identifying and prioritizing quality deficiencies, systematically analyzing underlying causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance Committee met quarterly, identified quality deficient areas to develop and implement an appropriate corrective action plans, to ensure satisfactory outcomes. Findings Include: Review of the sign-in sheets for the quarterly QAPI meetings indicated 2 sign-in sheets for the quarterly QAPI meeting held on 1/19/23. The sign-in sheets had signatures of some of the same people but in different ink. One of the sheets indicated the signature of the Medical Director while the other sheet indicated that he attended by phone. Further review failed to indicate a scheduled quarterly QAPI review had taken place. During an interview on 5/03/23, at 3:12 P.M. with the Administrator and the the Administrator In Training (AIT), the AIT said that she was not able to locate the sign in sheet for the quarterly QAPI meeting in April 2023. The Administrator acknowledged the 2 sign-in sheets for 1/19/23, but could not account for why there were 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to implement effective pest control management by not following pest control recommendations as evidenced by mouse activities, droppings on multiple resident rooms, including the kitchen. Findings include: During an environmental tour on the 3rd floor on 5/2/23, at 7:50 A.M., the surveyor observed multiple mouse traps below the radiator base board in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident #33 told the surveyor that a pest control service installed those mouse traps after he/she reported mouse sightings. Resident #33 told the surveyor that he/she can still hear mouse activity such as walking/chewing at night every now and then. Resident #33 told the surveyor that all rooms have mouse traps. The surveyor observed mouse traps in resident rooms, dining areas, and family rooms on all three nursing units on 5/3/23. Review of the facility grievance logs indicated residents had reported mouse sightings on 3/28/23, and 4/10/23. Review of the pest control reports and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement the plan of care for 2 Residents (#6, #50) and failed to develop a person-centered care plan with individualized interventions for 2 Residents (#67 and #23) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Shower/Tub Bath and not dated, failed to indicate that the resident has the choice of a shower or tub bath. Further review failed to indicate how often a shower is to be offered to a resident. 1. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in September 2013 with diagnoses including dementia, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #6 scored a 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating intact cognition. Further review indicated that Resident #6 is totally dependant for bathing. During an interview on 4/30/23, at 9:52 A.M., Resident #6 said she/he wants a shower twice a week and only gets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to 1.) provide meaningful and person-centered activity programming on one resident care unit out of three resident care units and 2.) failed to provide activities to three Residents (#23, #370, and #67.) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Programming for Residents, dated as revised 4/21/17, indicated the following: Activity programs are relevant and valuable to resident's quality of life. Activities are provided for maintenance and enhancement of each resident' quality of life while promoting physical, cognitive, and psychosocial well being. 1 The focus should be on the resident's abilities, not disabilities. 2 Activity programs are to be meaningful and reflect the resident's interests. and lifestyles and choices a Lifestyle and choices b Help the resident to develop new relationships c Resident to feel independent and helpful d Provide a sense of belonging 3. During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when 3 out of 3 nurses observed made 7 errors out of 28 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 25%. Those errors impacted 4 Residents (#15, #30, #57, and #272) out of 5 residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, undated, indicated: - medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. - the individual administering the medication must check the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. 1. For Resident #15, Nurse #2 crushed medications that were not crushable and failed to prime an insulin pen prior to use resulting in the incorrect dose of insulin being administered. During the medication pass observation on the 1st Floor on 5/1/23, at 8:20 A.M., Nurse #2 administered the following to Resident #15: -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and test trays, the facility failed to ensure food was served at safe and appetizing temperatures. Findings include: During the initial screening process on 4/30/23, at approximately 8:00 A.M., multiple residents interviewed on the 3rd floor unit complained of poor food quality. On 5/3/23 at 8:17 A.M., the third-floor food truck arrived at the resident care unit. After all resident trays were served the surveyor received the test tray at 8:38 A.M., the following was recorded: -Scrambled eggs, 100 degrees Fahrenheit, tasted warm but not hot -Breakfast Pastry, 90 degrees Fahrenheit, palatable -Hot cereal, 120 degrees Fahrenheit, watery and without flavor -Orange Juice, 60 degrees Fahrenheit, slightly cool, not cold -Milk, 58 degrees Fahrenheit, slightly cool, not cold On 5/3/23 at 8:27 A.M., the first-floor food truck arrived at the resident care unit. After all resident trays were served the surveyor received the test tray at 8:48 A.M., and the following was recorded: -Scrambled eggs registered at 90 degrees Fahrenheit, were warm to taste and had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview the facility failed to maintain proper sanitation practices related to food storage, food labeling, and food handling. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy, titled Preventing Food borne Illness - Food Handling, indicated the following: *Food will be stored, prepared, handled and served so that the risk of food borne illness is minimized. During the initial kitchen walk through on 4/30/23, at 7:09 A.M., the following produce was observed with significant visible signs of decomposition: *Tomatoes *Celery *Potatoes *Cabbages During an observation on 4/30/23, at approximately 7:45 A.M., the following was observed: *4 unlabeled and undated sandwiches in the refrigerator on the 1st floor kitchenette. *An unlabeled and undated container of food in the refrigerator of the 2nd floor kitchenette. During a tray line observation on 4/30/23, at 12:27 P.M., the surveyor observed the cook contaminating his gloves by touching the handles of serving utensils, a knife, and the microwave door. The cook then used the same contaminated gloves to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. For Resident #23 the facility failed to accurately document Resident #23's skin assessment and progress notes related to his/her skin status. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including sepsis, unsteadiness on feet, asthma, type 2 diabetes mellitus, unspecified dementia, and schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/28/23, indicated Resident #23 had a primary language of Spanish, scored 7 out of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status Exam (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, dressing, hygiene and was dependent on staff for bathing. Further, the MDS did not indicate Resident #23 displayed behaviors and did not indicate under section M skin, that Resident #23 had any open skin areas, that were not pressure areas. The surveyor made the following observations: -On 4/30/23, at 8:23 A.M., Resident #23 was observed with multiple reddened, circular scabbed areas on both his/her upper right and left arms. -On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for the administration a psychotropic medication (Depacote Sprinkles) prior to administration for one Resident (#27) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Resident #27 was admitted in October, 2022 with diagnoses including anxiety and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #27 scored a 99 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating he/she could not participate. The MDS indicated Resident #27 is severely cognitively impaired. Review of the physician orders for Resident #27 indicated the following: - Depakote Sprinkles (a psychotropic medication used to treat seizures and bipolar disorder) Capsule Delayed Release 125 milligrams (mg); give 2 capsule by mouth at bedtime and 1 capsule by mouth two times a day. During an interview on 5/01/23, at 8:23 A.M., the Director of Nursing said that there should be a consent for Depakote in the chart. The Director of Nursing said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to file a grievance for missing personal property for 1 Resident (#21) out of a total of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Grievances and dated 3/2021, indicated the following: *Any resident, his or her representative (sponsor), family member, or appointed advocate may file a grievance or complaint concerning treatment, medical care, behavior of the other residents, staff members, missing items, theft of property, etc., without fear of reprisal in any form. *Grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally or in writing. *Staff members are encouraged to assist residents in filing a grievance and/or complaint when the resident believes that his/her rights have been violated. *The grievance will be investigated and communicated to the filer within 72 hours. *Upon receipt of a grievance, complaint report or the missing items form, the Director of Social Services will begin an investigation into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to report in the required timeframe 1. an injury of unknown source for one Resident (#370) and 2. a resident-to-resident (Resident #67 and Resident #31) verbal altercation resulting in a fall with an injury for one Resident (#31) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated March 2017 indicated the following: All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall Be Promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported. Reporting 1. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to 1. thoroughly Investigate a bruise of unknown source for one Resident (#370) and 2. failed to investigate a resident-to-resident verbal abuse (Resident #31 and Resident #67) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated March 2017 indicated the following: All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall Be Promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported. Reporting 1. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the facility administrator, or his/her designee, to the following persons or agencies. A. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments in a timely manner for 3 Residents (#30, #56, and #9) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual 3.0 indicated the following: The Quarterly MDS must be completed no later than 14 days from the assessment reference date (ARD). 1. For Resident #30 review of the MDS's indicated a Quarterly assessment with an ARD of 9/22/22, with a completion date of 11/15/22, 40 days late. Further review indicated a Quarterly assessment with an ARD 12/20/22, and a completion date of 1/10/23, 7 days late. 2. For Resident #56 review of the MDS's indicated a Quarterly assessment with an ARD of 11/8/23, and a completion date of 1/10/23, 49 days late. Further review indicated a Quarterly assessment with an ARD of 1/24/23, and a completion date of 4/11/23, 63 days late. 3. For Resident # 9 review of the MDS's indicated a Quarterly assessment with an ARD of 9/22/22, and a Completion date of 11/15/22, 38 days late. A Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 3 Residents (#50, #22 and #67) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's, heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the medical record indicated the following weights: Date Time Weight 4/2/2023 15:07 113.8 Lbs (pounds) 3/29/2023 11:55 113.8 Lbs 3/22/2023 15:00 113.8 Lbs 3/15/2023 15:45 113.4 Lbs 3/1/2023 14:23 112.8 Lbs 2/22/2023 14:48 112.4 Lbs 2/8/2023 14:21 111.0 Lbs 2/1/2023 13:59 117.5 Lbs 1/25/2023 13:25 118.4 Lbs 1/18/2023 14:17 118.4 Lbs 1/11/2023 09:24 117.0 Lbs 1/4/2023 13:34 117.0 Lbs 12/21/2022 14:05 117.3 Lbs 12/21/2022 14:04 117.3 Lbs 12/17/2022 07:53 117.0 Lbs 11/16/2022 15:47 146.9 Lbs 10/26/2022 13:40 148.5 Lbs 10/19/2022 12:56 149.5 Lbs Review of the medical record indicated that Resident #50 a history of significant weight loss in the past 6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, policy review and interview the facility failed to 1. ensure that nursing administered medications that met professional standards of quality for 1 Resident (#22) and 2. failed to ensure professional standards of care for one Resident's (#23) skin, out of 34 sampled Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, undated, indicated: - Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders. - The following information must be checked/verify for each resident prior to administering medications. a. vital signs 1. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, syncope, anxiety, major depressive disorder, panic disorder, hypotension, atrial fibrillation and weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #22 is able to be understood and he/she had the ability to understand others. The MDS further indicated Resident #22 does not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide feeding assistance to 1 Resident (#27), resulting in the Resident not eating a meal, out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Resident #27 was admitted in October, 2022 with diagnoses including dysphagia and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident #27 is severely cognitively impaired. Further review of the MDS indicated that Resident #27 requires extensive assist of one person with eating. Review of the activities of daily living care plan indicated the following: *Requires 1 ASSIST with eating r/t DX (diagnosis) of Dysphagia , Behaviors and confusion, will not complete meals without staff assist, eats in DR (dining room). On 4/30/23, at 12:36 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #27 at a table in the dining room with food in front of him/her. A certified nursing aide (CNA) came over and put a spoon in Resident #27's ice cream and then walked away. At 12:41 P.M., Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure care was provided for one Resident (#23), who required extensive assistance. Specifically, Resident #23 was not provided nail care, resulting unclean fingernails out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including sepsis, unsteadiness on feet, asthma, type 2 diabetes mellitus, unspecified dementia, and schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/28/23, indicated Resident #23 had a primary language of Spanish, scored 7 out of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status Exam (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, dressing, hygiene and was dependent on staff for bathing. During the survey, the surveyor observed the following: *On 4/30/23, at 8:23 A.M. Resident #23, was resting in bed. Both his/her right and left hands had uneven fingernails, with debris under nail beds. *On 4/30/23, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quality care was provided to one Resident (#18), out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically when on 4/22/23, Resident #18 sustained a laceration to his/her left leg and was transferred to the hospital. Resident #18 returned from the hospital with sutures to his/her left leg and nursing obtained a telehealth visit which resulted in recommendations for antibiotic use and a suture removal date. The facility failed to ensure nursing implemented orders for an antibiotic and a plan for on-going monitoring and assessment of the wound. Findings include: Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in January 2022 with a diagnoses including venous insufficiency, muscle weakness, abnormalities of the gait and mobility, dysphagia, anxiety, legal blindness and lack of coordination. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, 3/28/23, indicated Resident #18 could make themselves understood and he/she has the ability to understand others. The MDS indicated his/her vision was severely impaired and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#63) foot care was provided to maintain good foot health, out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, for Resident #63 the facility failed to provide podiatry services for elongated toenails and failed to provide treatment for scaly, dry areas of the foot. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, entitled Diabetic Foot Care dated 9/16/16, indicated the following: The purpose of this procedure is to ensure that all residents are provided appropriate foot care and are monitored routinely for alterations in skin integrity to their feet. It is the intention of this facility to monitor, identify, and resolve any issues with skin integrity timely. Diabetic foot care will be provided by a licensed nurse. Inspect all aspects of the feet, including the sole and heal (sic) Inspect for discolored areas, cracks or splits, calluses, peeling skin, swelling, blisters and ulcers. Apply lotion to feet, avoiding between toes. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff provided appropriate care and services for one Resident (#8) with a Gastrostomy tube (G-tube: a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal incision for administration of nutrition, fluids, and medication), out of 34 sampled Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to have and accurate flow rate for feedings and accurate flush settings. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Enteral Nutrition dated 3/22/21, adequate nutritional support support through enteral feeding will be provided to residents as ordered. - The dietician, with the input from the physician and the nurse, will calculate fluids to be provided (beyond free fluids in the formula) - Enteral feedings will be scheduled to try to optimize resident independence whenever possible. The schedule will not be altered. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in April 2021 with diagnoses including respiratory failure, gastronomy tube placement, dysphagia, epilepsy, contracture, tracheostomy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain respiratory equipment according to professional standards of practice for 2 Residents (#22 and #8) out of a total sample of 34 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled oxygen administration, dated 3/2021, indicated the purpose of the procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. - verify there is a physician's order for oxygen administration. - review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. - document the oxygen flow rate, route, and rational. 1. For Resident #22 the facility failed to ensure that his/her oxygen flow rate was set according to the physician's order and failed to ensure that an oxygen tubing bag was not used for multiple residents. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnosis including end stage renal disease, syncope, anxiety, major depressive disorder, panic disorder, hypotension, atrial fibrillation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for one Resident (#22), who required renal dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys stop working), out of one applicable sampled resident, in a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate communication with the dialysis facility for the Resident's dialysis appointments. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Dialysis Patients, dated 3/21, indicated a dialysis communication binder will be sent with the patient in case of documentation with the facility and the dialysis center. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnosis including end stage renal disease, syncope, anxiety, major depressive disorder, panic disorder, hypotension, atrial fibrillation and weakness. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that sufficient staffing levels were maintained to safely and adequately meet each resident's personal care needs on 1 of 3 units. Findings included: 1. Review of the facility assessment dated reviewed 1/16/23, indicated the following during a typical month: 1. The average daily census of the 3rd floor unit is 36. 2. The number of clinically complex residents in the facility is 10-15. 3. The number of residents with behavioral symptoms and cognitive performance issues is 40-70. Further review indicated that the number of Certified Nurse's Aides (CNA) required to care for residents in the facility is 15-20. Further review failed to indicate how the CNA's were to be distributed through out the facility and shifts during the 24 hour period. Review of the CNA daily assignment sheets and daily staffing schedules, indicated that on 4/13/23, 4/16/23, 4/18/23, 4/20/23, 4/25/23, 4/29/23, 4/30/23 and 5/1/23, 5/2/23, 2 CNA's were assigned to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Nurse #2 was competent and had the required skill set to prepare and administer medications for one Resident (#15), that met professional standards of quality, out of a total sample of 34 Residents. -Nurse #2 crushed medications that should not have been crushed and Nurse #2 did not clean the rubber seal of an insulin pen and she did not prime the insulin pen prior to administering the injection. (removing the air from the needle and the cartridge that may collect during normal use. It is important to prime the pen before each injection so that the injection will work correctly. If a nurse does not prime before each injection, a nurse may give too much or too little insulin, resulting in the incorrect dose being administered.) Finding include: Review of the Humalog (short acting insulin) pen (insulin pen) manufacture's instructions, dated as reviewed 2023, indicated: - Wipe the rubber seal with an alcohol swab. - Push the capped needle straight onto the pen (rubber seal) and twist the needle on. - Prime…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide dental services to one Resident (#34) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dental Services and dated last revised 11/2017 indicated that routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. Further review indicated that all dental services provided are recorded in the resident's medical record. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in July 2021 with diagnoses including diabetes, heart disease and kidney disease. During an interview on 4/30/23, at 10:07 A.M., Resident #34 said she/he has had a tooth ache for 3 weeks. Resident #34 then said that the pain is at an 8 out of 10, with 10 being the worst ever. Resident #34 then said that she/he had been telling the nurses about the pain for weeks. During an interview on 5/1/23, at 11:39 A.M. Resident #34 said the tooth pain was a 3 out of 10. Resident #34 then said that the pain was not as bad…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program for one Resident (#18) out of a total sample of 34 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Antibiotic Stewardship - Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes, dated as revised 12/19, indicated: - antibiotic usage and outcome will be collected and documented using a facility- approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. - the infection preventionist will review all antibiotic starts within 48 hours to determine if continued therapy is justified, justified with needed intervention, or not justified. - at the conclusion of the review, the provider will be notified of the review findings and recommendations. The provider will documented if he/she agrees to make the change. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in January 2022 with a diagnoses including venous insufficiency, muscle weakness, abnormalities of the gait and mobility, dysphagia, anxiety, legal blindness and lack of coordination. Review of Resident #18's telemedicine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of personnel files and training documentation, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 certified nurse aides (CNA) and 1 of 1 nurses' were provided with training on dementia management in accordance with State and Federal requirements. Findings include: Review of the 4 hour Hand-in Hand dementia care training certificate indicated that CNA #1 and #13 and Nurse #2 successfully completed the 4 hour Hand-in Hand dementia care training on 2/27/23. Review of the facility documents titled Dementia Care Education Test For 4 hr Training, indicated that CNA #1 and #13 and Nurse #2 took the test on 4/22/23, nearly 2 months later. Further review indicated that the dementia training test was not signed by any of the employees whose name was on the test. The surveyor requested to see the time card punches for the dates of 2/27/23 and 4/22/23 for CNA #1, #13 and nurse #2. The surveyor was presented with time card punches for 2/22/23. During an interview on 5/1/23, at 2:42 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) was unable to explain why the date of the dementia training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$2,186 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $2,186 — penalty dated 2024-07-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 03/15/2024 |
| ISHAKIS, YOCHANAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 45% | since 03/15/2024 |
| LEVINE, YISROEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 55% | since 03/15/2024 |
| CELTIC BANK CORPORATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 09/03/2024 |
| ZENITH CARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/03/2024 |
| BASTIEN, REGINALD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/03/2024 |
| AWEH, NELSON | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/03/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225198. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.