No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Grove at Carvalho

273 Oak Grove Avenue, Fall River, MA 02723 · For profit - Corporation · 112 certified beds · (781) 831-3966 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (781) 831-3966 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)2 actual-harm citations$39,082 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $39,082 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-03)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
151 Robeson St Ste 101 · (508) 973-2211 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
387 Quarry St · (774) 322-1335 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1090 Pleasant St · (508) 617-9436 · Call to confirm hours
Park
28 Wall St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.6%16.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.9%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.9%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.9%15.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.1%15.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.1%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.1%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.0%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.6%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.9%21.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine29.2%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.3%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.6%11.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.101.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.911.501.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 144 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.2%CMS range 42.8–60.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.7–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge31.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.4–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.85
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 79.2 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-08)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who per rehabilitation staff required the use of a mechanical lift for all transfers, and per facility policy two staff members were required to complete lift transfers, the facility failed to ensure that 1) Resident #1's individualized comprehensive plan of care, which included his/her care Kardex, clearly indicated the number of staff members required to provide assistance during the transfers, and as a result one staff member attempted to transfer him/her alone, he/she fell, and sustained a fracture to his/her left ankle, and 2) failed to ensure they developed and implemented a comprehensive plan of care related to Resident #1's ankle fracture, that accurately identified care and treatment needs associated with new placement of a fiberglass splint, that included appropriate interventions, goals and outcomes.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated as revised May 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required the use of a Sit/Stand Lift (mobility aid that helps people transition safely from sitting to standing), for all transfers, with two staff members present to assist and complete the transfer, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance, in accordance with facility policy, to maintain his/her safety and prevent an incident/accident resulting in a significant injury. On 01/01/26, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 transferred Resident #1 with a Sit/Stand Lift, without another staff member present to assist him, Resident #1 slid out of the sling, fell onto the floor, complained of pain to his/her left lower extremity, was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) and diagnosed with a left ankle fracture.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled, Safe Resident Handling/Transfers, dated as revised May 2025, indicated the following:-the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain an infection prevention and control program with a complete system of surveillance to identify any trends of actual or potential infections within the facility; and 2. Ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized when providing care to two Residents (#11, #5) on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP: infection prevention practice of wearing gown and gloves while performing direct care activities to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms [MDRO's - bacteria that are resistant to three or more types of antimicrobial drugs]) including one Resident (#23) on Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP: additional infection control measures beyond standard precautions to prevent the spread of highly transmissible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program which included antibiotic use protocols and monitoring of antibiotic use in accordance with the facility's antibiotic stewardship program.Findings include:Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The purpose of an antibiotic stewardship program is to improve the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance.- Antibiotic stewardship refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use.- The CDC recommends that all nursing homes take steps to improve antibiotic prescribing practices and reduce inappropriate use.- Any action taken to improve antibiotic use is expected to reduce adverse events, prevent emergence of resistance, and lead to better outcomes for residents in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater when two out of three nurses observed during a medication pass made two errors out of 39 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 5%. Those errors impacted two Residents (#33 and #64), out of five residents observed.Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated but was not limited to, the following:-Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescribers. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, undated, indicated but was not limited to:- Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame.- The individual administering the medication checks the label to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in a safe and secure manner as required. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:1. Licensed staff locked one of two treatment carts, which contained numerous topical treatments and biologicals, when it was not in use and left in the hallway where it could be accessed by residents or passersby on the Oak Grove unit; and2. Medications were dated once opened, and discarded according to manufacturer's guidelines, in one of three medication carts observed.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, undated, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light and humidity controls. 1. On 4/6/26 on the Oak Grove unit, the surveyor made the following observations of the Oak Grove treatment cart:-3:06 P.M. - The treatment cart was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the main kitchen floor tile was maintained in a sanitary and safe condition and was free of standing, pooled water. Findings include:Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised January 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 1-2 Definitions 1-201 Applicability and Terms Defined1-201.10 Statement of Application and Listing of Terms.Easily Cleanable.(1) Easily cleanable means a characteristic of a surface that: (a) Allows effective removal of soil by normal cleaning methods; (b) Is dependent on the material, design, construction, and installation of the surface; and (c) Varies with the likelihood of the surface's role in introducing pathogenic or toxigenic agents or other contaminants into food based on the surface's approved placement, purpose, and use. Smooth means:(3) A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had recently sustained a fracture of the distal end of the tibia and left fibula (fracture of the ankle), the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff provided care and services that met professional standards of quality, when nurses were unaware of what type of orthotic device he/she was wearing and were documenting they were providing care and treatment to his/her left ankle that they could not have completed, based on the type of orthotic device he/she had in place.Findings include:Pursuant to Massachusetts General Law (M.G.L.), chapter 112, individuals are given the designation of Registered Nurse and Practical Nurse which includes the responsibility to provide nursing care. Pursuant to the Code of Massachusetts Regulation (CMR) 244, Rules and Regulations 3.02 and 3.04 define the responsibilities and functions of a Registered Nurse and Practical Nurse respectively. The regulations stipulate that both the Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), who was dependent on the physical assistance of staff with Activities of Daily Living (ADL), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record, when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) ADL Flow Sheets, daily documentation by CNA's (for all three shifts) were not consistently completed, with flow sheets left blank.Findings include:Review of the Facility's Policy tilted, Charting and Documentation, dated May 2023, indicated the following:-services provided to the resident to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record;-objective observations, treatments or services performed, are documented in the resident medical record;Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in March 2024 diagnoses included cerebral palsy, embolism and thrombosis of deep veins…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-19 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to conduct and implement a comprehensive facility wide assessment that was inclusive of resources necessary to provide both emergency and day to day care of the population the facility currently serves. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memo titled Revised Guidance for Long-Term Care Facility Assessment Requirements, dated 6/18/24, indicated but was not limited to: -In conducting the facility assessment, the facility must ensure active involvement of the following participants in the process: - The facility's resident population, including, but not limited to: - The care required by the resident population; - The physical environment, equipment, services, and other physical plant considerations that are necessary to care for this population; and - Any ethnic, cultural, or religious factors that may potentially affect the care provided by the facility, including, but not limited to, activities and food and nutrition services. - The facility's resources, including but not limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance Committee identified quality deficient areas and implemented an appropriate corrective action plan, to ensure satisfactory outcomes. Specifically, the facility failed to develop and implement a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan and a Performance Improvement Project (PIP) that focused on a high risk or problem-prone area identified through data collection and analysis. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled QAPI Facility Plan, dated 3/4/2024, indicated but was not limited to: - The QAPI Plan is designed to establish and maintain an organized facility wide program that is data-driven and utilizes a proactive approach to improving quality of care and services throughout the facility. This is a living document that will continue to be refined and revised. - The QAA (Quality Assurance and Assessment) Committee's overall responsibility is to develop and modify the plan, analyze information, and set priorities for PIPs. Priority will be given to issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to personal privacy and confidentiality was promoted and protected for one Resident (#337), from a total sample of 21 residents, and unopened mail and other letters, packages and other materials delivered to the facility were promptly received by residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff did not communicate Resident #337's private health information with his/her Nurse Practitioner (NP) via a text messaging application utilizing an unsecured mobile phone platform; and 2. United States Postal Service (USPS) mail and/or packages was promptly delivered to residents within 24 hours of delivery by the postal service. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Security of Portable Electronic Devices, last revised January 2025, indicated but was not limited to: - To aid in the prevention of disclosure of confidential information, our company has adopted procedures for the safety and security of confidential business and protected health information. The purpose of this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were fully aware of the grievance process. Specifically, for nine of nine residents who attended the resident group meeting, the facility failed to ensure residents were aware of and had access to grievance forms, and were aware they could formulate grievances anonymously, should they choose not to alert a staff member of their concern(s). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Complaint/Grievance Policy Procedure, dated September 2023, indicated but was not limited to: - Voiced grievances (e.g. those about treatment, care, management of funds, lost clothing, or violation of rights) are not limited to a formal, written process and may include a resident's verbalized complaint to facility staff. - Grievance/Complaint forms will be available at the nurse's station or other designated area. - Residents and/or their responsible representative shall complete the form. - If a resident is unable to complete the form, a staff member shall assist them. - Staff shall complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and individualize comprehensive care plans for seven Residents (#1, #16, #78, #43, #14, #50 and #72), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #1, to implement the Resident's end stage renal disease (ESRD) care plan for fluid restriction; 2. For Resident #16 to ensure the Resident's urinary catheter care plan was Resident specific and included accurate information on the manner in which catheter care was provided and monitored; 3. For Residents #78, #43, and #14, to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address the use of psychotropic medication that identified target behaviors and individualized, measurable non-pharmacological interventions and measurable goals of treatment; 4. For Resident #50, to implement the Resident's nutritional care plan related to a fluid restriction; and 5. For Resident #72, to develop and implement a care plan for the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of practice for five Residents (#72, #50, #1, #43, and #78), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #72, to ensure Clonidine (antihypertensive drug) was administered within the parameter as prescribed by the physician to help prevent low blood pressure and heart rate; 2A. For Resident #50, who had end stage renal disease, to ensure the food service department was notified of the Resident's 1500 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction, fluids were not left at the bedside without being calculated into the daily fluid restriction, and fluid restriction for each shift was consistently followed per physician's orders; B. For Resident #1, to ensure that staff consistently implemented the prescribed fluid restriction of 1200 ml a day for the Resident who was on hemodialysis; 3. For Resident #43, to ensure injection sites for subcutaneous (SC-insertion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Physician signed and dated all orders for one Resident (#14), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Orders, undated, indicated but was not limited to: -Supervision by a Physician: -Physician orders/Progress notes must be signed and dated every thirty (30) days. (Note: this may be changed to every sixty (60) days after the first ninety (90) days of the resident's admission) Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in August 2016 and has diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, major depression with severe psychotic symptoms, and bipolar disorder. Review of the medical record, Electronic Medical Record (EMR), and the Order Review History report, indicated the Resident's Physician last signed the Resident's orders on 11/8/24. There were no additional orders signed by the Physician. During an interview on 2/19/25 at 1:59 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed Resident #14's medical record and said the last signed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided Physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP) visits every 30 days within the first 90 days of admission and then every 60 days thereafter for three Residents (#1, #43, and #14), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #1, to ensure the Resident was seen at least every 30 days for the first 90 days of his/her admission to the facility; 2. For Resident #43, to have visits completed by the Physician or NP every 60 days; and 3. For Resident #14, to ensure the Resident was provided oversight of their care and visits by a clinician. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Visits and Physician Delegation Policy, dated as revised January 2025, indicated but was not limited to the following: - It is the policy of this facility to ensure the physician takes an active role in supervising the care of residents - the physician should see the residents within 30 days of admission, and the resident must be seen at least once every 30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility's Consultant Pharmacist failed to identify irregularities in medications during the monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for two Residents (#30 and #1), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #30, the Pharmacist reviewed and reported irregularities related to the administration of a pain medication; and 2. For Resident #1, the Pharmacy consultant identified a lack of rationale documentation for the ongoing use of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic benzodiazepine/anti-anxiety medication. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Consultant Pharmacist Services Provider Requirements, effective date January 2024, indicated but was not limited to: - The consultant pharmacist provides consultation on all aspects of the provision of pharmacy services in the facility. In collaboration with facility staff, the consultant pharmacist helps to identify, communicate, address, and resolve concerns and issues related to the provision of pharmaceutical services. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety to prevent the potential of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Properly label and date food products stored in the free-standing refrigerators in the main kitchen and discard food when past their use by date; 2. Ensure food was properly stored in the walk-in freezer in the main kitchen; and 3. Ensure food was discarded when past their manufacturer's expiration date in one of two resident nourishment kitchen refrigerators reviewed. Findings include: Review of a facility document titled Labeling and Dating Inservice, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: Guidelines for Labeling and Dating: -All foods should be dated upon receipt before being stored. Food labels must include: -The food item name -The date of preparation/receipt/removal from freezer -The use by date as outlined in the attached guidelines -Leftovers must be labeled and dated with the date they are prepared and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not self-administered without a physician's order and an assessment for self-administration was completed for two Residents (#58 and #73), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, undated, indicated but was not limited to: - Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, undated, indicated but was not limited to: - Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for residents to do so. - As part of their overall evaluation, the staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#11), out of a total sample of 21 residents, had their call light accessible and within reach in order to utilize to call for assistance. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Call System, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The facility will be equipped with a communication to ensure residents have the ability to contact a staff member for assistance from their bedside and from toilet and bathing areas. - When in their rooms and toilet and bathing areas, residents will have a means of directly contacting caregivers. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in July 2014 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, history of falling, and anxiety. Review of Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/17/24, indicated he/she had a severe cognitive deficit and required extensive assistance for activities of daily living. During the following days and times, the surveyor made the following observations: - On 2/12/25 at 8:05…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician and/or responsible party of recommendations or changes in condition for two Residents (#43 and #1), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #43, to notify the physician/physician extender of STAT x-ray (a medical imaging technique that uses electromagnetic radiation to create images of internal structures in the body) results in order to make a treatment decision; and 2. For Resident #1, to notify the attending physician group of Resident #1 exceeding their daily fluid restriction of 1200 milliliters (ml) a day. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, last revised November 2015, indicated but was not limited to: -The Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or On-Call Physician when there has been: -A need to alter the resident's treatment significantly -Refusal of treatment or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was free of accidents and hazards on one ([NAME] Unit) out of three units. Specifically, the Nurse failed to secure an insulin vial in her medication cart while not in her sight leaving it accessible to residents in the immediate vicinity. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, undated, indicated but was not limited to: -During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept locked and closed when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide. -No medications are kept on top of the cart. -The cart must be inaccessible to residents or others passing by. Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, undated, indicated but was not limited to: -Drugs and biologics used in the facility are stored in locked compartments. -Only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications have access to locked medications. On 2/13/25 at 8:56 A.M., the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed for two Residents (#30 and #57) of 21 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to the Resident consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the Resident's goals and preferences. Specifically, the facility failed: 1) For Resident #30, to administer his/her prescribed, as needed, opioid (pain medication) medication in accordance with physician's orders and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan addressing his/her pharmacological and non-pharmacological needs; and 2) For Resident #57, to administer his/her prescribed, as needed, opioid medication in accordance with physician's orders. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pain Assessment and Management, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Purpose: the purposes of this procedure are to help staff identify pain in the resident, and to develop interventions that are consistent with resident's goals and needs and that address the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#43), out of a total sample of 21 residents, was free from unnecessary medication administration. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Resident was not treated with two different antibiotics (Augmentin and Bactrim) by two different clinicians concurrently without adequate indications for their use. Findings include: Review of the USAntibiotics website indicated that to reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of AUGMENTIN and other antibacterial drugs, AUGMENTIN should be used only to treat infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by bacteria. Review of the [NAME] Pharmaceuticals website indicated that to reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of BACTRIM and other antibacterial drugs, BACTRIM tablets should be used only to treat or prevent infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by bacteria.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure for two Residents (#78 and #1), out of a total sample of 21 residents, that each Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #78, to monitor the Resident for potential adverse consequences for the use of antianxiety medication; and 2. For Resident #1, to ensure a documented rationale was in place for the ongoing extended use of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic benzodiazepine/anti-anxiety medication. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Use of Psychotropic Medication, dated December 2024, indicated: - Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication(s). 1. Resident #78 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 and had diagnoses including major depressive disorder and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate up to date medical record for one Resident (#1), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in October 2024. During an interview on 2/13/25 at 1:10 P.M., Nurse #3 said all Physician and Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress notes are scanned into the electronic medical record under the tab labeled Miscellaneous. Review of the Miscellaneous section of Resident #1's medical record on 2/13/25 indicated only one progress note was available since the Resident's admission, completed by NP #2 and dated 11/27/24. Review of the census section of Resident #1's medical record indicated they had a paid hospital leave since their admission in October 2024 but has remained an active Resident since that admission. During an interview on 2/18/25 at 10:32 A.M., the Medical Records Clerk said the Physicians and NPs send their progress notes to the facility receptionist by email and then the receptionist places them in the correct resident records. She said although she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed for one Resident (#72), out of a total sample of 21 residents, to ensure that staff performed hand hygiene after doffing (removing) gloves and prior to donning (putting on) new gloves during a wound dressing change to help prevent the potential for healthcare-associated infections. Findings include: Review of Lippincott Nursing Procedures, Eighth Edition. [Philadelphia; Wolters Kluwer, [2019], indicated, but was not limited to the following: - Hand Hygiene is a general term used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to refer to hand washing, antiseptic hand washing, and antiseptic hand rubbing. Hand hygiene is the single most important procedure in preventing infection. Using an alcohol-based hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to implement their antibiotic stewardship program by failing to monitor the use of dual antibiotics for one Resident (#43), who did not meet criteria for a urinary tract infection (UTI) using the facility's pre-defined McGeer criteria, out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The elements of the infection prevention and control program consist of oversight, coordination, policies/procedures, surveillance, data analysis antibiotic stewardship, outbreak management and prevention of infection and employee health and safety. Antibiotic Stewardship: - culture reports, sensitivity data and antibiotic usage reviews are included in surveillance activities - medical criteria and standardized definitions of infections are used to help recognize and manage infections - antibiotic usage is evaluated and practitioners are provided feedback on reviews Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had an activated Health Care Proxy (HCP) and had been admitted on to Hospice Services, the Facility failed to ensure nursing immediately notified his/her Health Care Agent (HCA), when on 08/21/24, Resident #1 was found lying in a bathtub, with his/her clothes on, cold water was running out from the tub faucet, and he/she was noted to be surrounded in about three inches of cold water. Resident #1's HCA as not made aware of the incident until close to six hours later, when the Hospice Nurse notified her. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, titled Notification of Changes, dated as revised March 2024, indicated the following: -the facility will promptly contact and consult the resident's physician, notify the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification; -circumstances requiring notification include significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial condition such as deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status; -for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was found lying in a bathtub in three inches of cold water with his/her clothes on, was observed by staff to be visibly cold, was shivering and cold to the touch, the Facility failed to ensure that he/she was provided with nursing services that met acceptable standards of practice related to nursing assessment of his/her vital signs (indicators of body's basic functions and help assess the general physical health) immediately after the incident. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Nursing Examination and Assessment, undated, indicated the following: -examine and assess the resident for any abnormalities in health status; -physical examination, obtain vital signs: blood pressure, pulse, respirations and temperature; -document all assessment data obtained in the resident's medical record; -notify the physician of any abnormalities such as abnormal vital signs. -report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had been admitted on to Hospice Services, the Facility failed to ensure nursing immediately communicated to the Hospice an incident that occurred with a need to potentially alter his/her plan of care, when on 08/21/24, Resident #1 was found lying in a bathtub, fully clothed, with the cold water faucet running, he/she was surrounded by three inches of cold water, was observed by staff to be visibly cold, was shivering, and was cold to the touch, however the Hospice Agency was not notified of the incident until six hours later, when the Hospice Nurse arrived at the facility. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, titled Coordination of Hospice Services, dated as revised March 2024, indicated the following: -the facility will coordinate and provide care in cooperation with hospice staff; -the facility will communicate with hospice and identify, communicate, follow and document all interventions put into place by hospice and the facility; -the facility will immediately contact and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, for six Residents (#16, #19, #47, #23, #40, and #30), out of a total sample of 19, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodations were made. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the call system button was accessible to Residents to call for assistance per facility policy. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Answer the Call Light, effective date 12/21/22, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs - When the resident is in the bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. - Some residents may not be able to use their call light. If this is the case, another type of call light, a bell, or a buzzer may be appropriate. 1. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in July 2014 with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, which indicated the Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Resident #75 was admitted to the facility in May 2023. Review of the comprehensive admission MDS assessment from May 2023 indicated Resident #75 had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. Review of the nursing Oral Health Assessment, dated 12/2/23, indicated Resident #75 had natural teeth which were unhealthy with decay or very worn down. Review of the nursing progress notes indicated on 12/4/23 Resident #75 had a bloody nose and blood coming from his/her mouth. The note indicated upon assessment the nurse noted one of the front bottom teeth had cracked and come out. The note indicated the area had stopped bleeding, but there continued to be swelling. Review of the medical record on 12/22/23 failed to include a care plan with goals and interventions regarding the poor dentition for Resident #75. During an interview on 12/22/23 at 12:10 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nurses said Resident #75 had broken a tooth earlier in the month. She said there had been no care plan in place prior to the surveyor inquiry. Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staffing time sheets and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staffing included the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for a minimum of eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. Specifically, between July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023 there was no RN coverage in a 24-hour period for 11 out of 92 days and between December 1, 2023 and December 25, 2023 there was no RN coverage in a 24-hour period for 2 out of 25 days. Findings include: Review of the nursing schedules, timecards and agency staffing from July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023 indicated there was no Registered Nurse coverage during the day, evening or night shift for the following days: - July 8, 2023 - July 9, 2023 - July 14, 2023 - August 6, 2023 - August 19, 2023 - August 20, 2023 - August 25, 2023 - September 3, 2023 - September 4, 2023 - September 16, 2023 - September 17, 2023 During an interview on 12/26/23 at 2:53 P.M., the Administrator said there was no RN for eight consecutive hours on the days identified in July, August, and September 2023. Review of the nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in two out of two nourishment kitchenettes. Specifically, the facility failed to properly label and date resident items in unit refrigerators, as well as maintain safe and clean equipment. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Brought in By Family/Visitors, dated as last revised on 1/1/20, indicated but was not limited to: - To allow residents to consume food safely that is brought in by families/visitors and/or outside vendors. - Perishable foods must be stored in re-sealable containers with tightly fitting lids in the refrigerator. Containers will be labeled with the resident's name, the item and the use by date. - Perishable foods will be discarded on or before the use by date. - The nursing and/or food service staff must discard any foods prepared for the resident that show obvious signs of potential foodborne danger (for example,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program as dictated by their infection control plan and policies. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate surveillance line listings and analyze their collected surveillance data to identify any trends of actual or potential infections within the facility to validate the effectiveness of their program. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled [NAME] Grove: Infection Control and Prevention Program, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - the infection preventionist (IP) is responsible for the integrity of the infection control program, and ensuring that integral parts of surveillance, tracking and trending are in place - the Director of Nurses (DON) participates in the assessment or analysis of the key processes of the infection prevention and control program - the IP conducts surveillance for facility associated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the Health Care Proxy (HCP) of Resident #75 when the Resident broke a tooth, requiring dental follow-up. The total sample was 19 residents. Findings include: Resident #75 was admitted to the facility in May 2023. Review of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set from May 2023 indicated Resident #75 had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. Review of the Social Service progress note from 11/13/23 indicated the HCP for Resident #75 had requested the Resident be seen by a dentist. Review of the nursing Oral Health Assessment, dated 12/2/23, indicated Resident #75 had natural teeth which were unhealthy with decay or very worn down. Review of the nursing progress notes indicated on 12/4/23, Resident #75 had a bloody nose and blood coming from his/her mouth. The note indicated upon assessment the nurse noted one of the front bottom teeth had cracked and come out. The note indicated the area had stopped bleeding, but there continued to be swelling. During an interview on 12/26/23 at 4:00 P.M., the HCP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#55), out of a total sample of 19 residents, was referred for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation (an evaluation to determine if a resident needs specialized services to address his/her Serious Mental Illness (SMI)). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled PASRR, last revised 11/01/21, included but was not limited to the following: -when an individual who resides in a nursing facility has experienced a significant change or the individual is newly identified as having a condition that may impact the individual's PASRR disability status, the appropriateness of the individual's nursing facility placement or the individual's need for specialized services the facility must submit a PASRR -in all instances the nursing facility (NF) must request a resident review from the PASRR office no later than the next business day following the date on which the facility detects that the member: experienced a significant change or is newly identified as having a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services for two Residents (#50 and #70), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #50, to ensure oxygen tubing and filters were changed and cleaned weekly; and 2. For Resident #70, to maintain oxygen equipment for respiratory care consistent with professional standards. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled O2 Safe Solutions Equipment Changing, undated, included but was not limited to: - All respiratory therapy equipment must be changed in order to prevent nosocomial infections. - The equipment should be marked with the date it was changed. - All equipment should be changed on a weekly basis as well as prn if it becomes soiled or falls on the ground. The equipment includes but is not limited to: (1) nasal cannulas, (3) nebulizer treatment equipment. Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration Policy and Procedures, dated 12/6/22, included but was not limited to: - Oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services for one Resident (#55), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Behavioral Health Services, dated as revised on 12/7/21, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility will initiate referrals to psychiatric services, having the resident or responsibly party signed consent, as behavioral health concerns are identified. -The facility will ensure that, a resident who displays or is diagnosed with a mental disorder, psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder, receives appropriate treatment and services. -The resident will receive and the facility will provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations from medication regimen reviews (MRR) were reviewed and addressed timely for one Resident (#2), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Consultant Pharmacist Services Provider Requirements, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The consultant pharmacist documents activities performed and services provided on behalf of the residents and the facility. -A written or electronic report of findings and recommendations resulting from the activities as described above is given to the attending physician, director of nursing, medical director and others as may be appropriate (e.g. administrator, regional manager, etc.) at least monthly. -The facility has a process to ensure that the findings are acted upon. -Resident-specific recommendations are documented (in the resident's active record). Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in April 2018 with diagnoses of major depressive disorder and anxiety. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to monitor for signs/symptoms of adverse consequences (i.e., side effects) of an anticoagulant agent (blood thinner) prescribed for one Resident (#46), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Anticoagulant Policy, dated as revised 10/10/22, indicated but was not limited to: -Anticoagulants are medicines that help prevent blood clots. They are given to people at a high risk of getting clots, to reduce their chances of developing serious conditions such as strokes and heart attacks. -All residents receiving anticoagulants will be monitored for abnormal signs/symptoms of bleeding. The Physician/Designee will be updated on any abnormal signs/symptoms of bleeding for further treatment/monitoring follow up. Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses which included acute thrombosis (clotting of the blood). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/4/23, indicated Resident #46 had a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for one Resident (#9), out of a total sample of 19 residents, was prescribed with a 14-day duration order. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Use Psychotropic Drugs, dated 12/6/21, indicated but was not limited to: -A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. Psychotropic drugs include but are not limited to the following categories: antipsychotic, antidepressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotics. -The attending physician will assume leadership in medication management by developing, monitoring, and modifying the medication regime in collaboration with residents, their families and/or representatives, or other professionals, and the interdisciplinary team. -PRN orders for psychotropic drugs shall be used only when the medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record, and for a limited duration (i.e., 14 days).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to facilitate dental services for one Resident (#75), out of a total of 19 residents. Findings include: Resident #75 was admitted to the facility in May 2023. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #75 had an activated Health Care Proxy (HCP) who had signed the consent form for dental service in May 2023. Review of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment from May 2023 indicated Resident #75 had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. Review of the Social Service progress note from 11/13/23 indicated the HCP for Resident #75 had requested the Resident be seen by a dentist. Review of the nursing Oral Health Assessment, dated 12/2/23, indicated Resident #75 had natural teeth which were unhealthy with decay or very worn down. Review of the nursing progress notes indicated on 12/4/23 Resident #75 had a bloody nose and blood coming from his/her mouth. The note indicated upon assessment the nurse noted one of the front bottom teeth had cracked and come out. The note indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-02-19 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the availability of statements of deficiencies and plans of correction from complaint investigations conducted since the previous recertification survey were prominent and readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents without having to ask to see them, as required. Findings include: On 2/13/25 at 1:30 P.M., the surveyor held a resident group meeting with nine residents in attendance representing each of the facility's three units. Nine of nine residents said they were not aware of the availability of survey results, and that they could examine the survey results without asking to see them. On 2/13/25 at 2:05 P.M., the surveyor toured the second-floor units and was unable to find postings of the availability of survey results. On 2/13/25 at 2:12 P.M., the surveyor searched the lobby area and observed a large, three-ringed binder labeled survey results resting on a shelf behind the reception desk. The binder was inaccessible to residents, family members, and legal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-02-19 · tag F0844 — pattern
    Follow rules about disclosure of ownership requirements and tell the state agency about changes in ownership and/or administrative personnel.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS- State agency reporting system), the facility failed to provide written notice to the State agency when a change in the facility's Administrator occurred. Findings include: During an interview on 2/12/25 at 8:43 A.M., the Administrator said that he started working at the facility on 12/27/23 as the Administrator. Review of HCFRS indicated the last time the State was notified of an Administrator change for the facility was 10/30/23. Further review of HCFRS failed to indicate the State Agency was notified when the change took place for the current Administrator. During an interview on 2/16/25 at 1:04 P.M., the Director of Operations reviewed HCFRS and said the last time the Administrator information was updated for the facility was on 10/30/23. The Director of Operations said the Administrator had started at the facility on 12/27/23. The Director of Operations said he thought the information had been updated by the previous Director of Nursing, but it had not.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$39,082 in federal fines across 7 penalties.

  • $8,278 — penalty dated 2026-02-03
  • $8,278 — penalty dated 2026-02-03
  • $4,178 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $3,529 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
  • $8,469 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • $2,117 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $4,233 — penalty dated 2023-10-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$371K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 52%Medicare 7%Other / private 40%

This home reported $371K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$356per resident / day
operating cost
$10,808per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$295per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225453. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next