The Gardens at Cedarwood
130 Chestnut Street, Franklin, MA 02038 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 82 certified beds · (508) 528-4600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $7,596 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-20)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.6% | 16.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.4% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.2% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 3.4% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.8% | 15.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.2% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.3% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.0% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 58.5% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.3% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.3% | 11.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.68 | 1.88 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.91 | 1.50 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.7%CMS range 35.5–60.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 8.1–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.4–13.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.71 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 54.4 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit direct care staffing data to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the entire reporting period, Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 -March 31) in accordance with the schedule specified by CMS. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Payroll Based Journal, dated as revised January 2025, indicated but was not limited to: -It is the policy of this facility to electronically submit timely to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS -The facility will submit direct care staffing information in the uniform format specified by CMS -The facility will submit direct care staffing information on the schedule specified by CMS, but no less frequently than quarterly Review of the PBJ Staffing Report, CASPER Report 1705D, FY Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 - March 31), indicated the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-17 · tag F0551 — patternGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a [NAME] Treatment Plan (court approved treatment plan for the administration of antipsychotic medications) was active and current for administration of an antipsychotic medication for one Resident (#10), out of a total sample of 14 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychoactive Medication Policy, dated [DATE], indicated but was not limited to the following: -Residents who have guardians need to have a [NAME] in order for the facility to administer antipsychotic medication Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia and dementia. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #10 was found to be incapable of taking care of himself/herself by reason of mental illness and Guardianship was appointed on [DATE] by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Probate and Family Court. Subsequent review of the medical record indicated the court issued an expansion of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- Preadmission screening for residents with a mental disorder or intellectual disability) was accurately completed prior to the admission of one Resident (#4), in a total sample of 14 residents. Findings include: Review of the Nursing Facility Bulletin 169: Updates to Nursing Facility Regulations: PASRR for Intellectual Disability (ID), Developmental Disability (DD), and Serious Mental Illness (SMI), dated October 2021, indicated the following: A Level I Screening identifies whether an applicant for admission to a nursing facility has, or may have, ID, DD, and/or SMI (i.e. a positive Level I Screening). Effective October 29, 2021, a Level I Screening must be conducted using the revised Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screening Form, PASRR-L1 (10/21). If the individual has a positive Level I Screening, the screener must refer the individual to the appropriate PASRR authority for a Level II Evaluation or Abbreviated Level II Evaluation, as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) were communicated to the physician and addressed in a timely manner for one Resident (#1), out of a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from August and September 2024 by the pharmacy consultant to evaluate continued use of as needed Geri-tussin (cough syrup) and menthol lozenge was reviewed and responded to by the provider in a timely manner. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Reconciliation Policy, revised January 2025, indicated but was not limited to the following: -This facility reconciles medication to ensure that the resident is free of any significant medication errors -Monthly Processes: Provide pharmacy consultant access to all medication areas and records for completion of pharmacy services activities -Respond to any medication irregularities reported by pharmacy consultant within relevant time frames. Review of the facility's policy titled Consultant Pharmacist Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, document review, and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for one Resident (#207), of 14 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure his/her indwelling Foley catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag outside the body) was maintained in a sanitary manner. Findings include: Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Summary of Recommendations, Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections, dated March 2024, indicated but was not limited to: -Keep the collecting bag below the level of the bladder at all times. Do not rest the bag on the floor. Review of the facility's policy titled Urinary Catheter Care, undated, indicated but was not limited to: -Infection Control: be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Resident #207 was admitted to the facility in June 2025 with diagnoses which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit direct care staffing data to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the entire reporting period, Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 1 2024 (October 1 - December 31) in accordance with the schedule specified by CMS. Findings include: Review of the CMS Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, CASPER Report 1705D, indicated the facility failed to submit data for the quarter. During an interview on 5/8/24 at 7:44 A.M., the Nursing Staff Scheduler said she did not know who did the PBJ reporting. During an interview on 5/8/24 at 12:38 P.M., Consulting Staff #5 said in reviewing the data sent to him from the facility it appears the data from October 1-15 was missing. He said the first 15 days of data were missing from the previous owners and that is probably why it got kicked back. Additionally, he said he was going to look into it further. During an interview on 5/8/24 at 1:18 P.M, Consulting Staff #5 said the previous owners did not file the data for October 1-15 as they should have and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, document review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain an infection prevention and control program with a complete system of surveillance to identify any trends of actual or potential infections within the facility; 2. For Resident #36, ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) as required for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP); 3. For Resident #160, ensure EBP were implemented, and PPE was utilized when providing high contact resident care; and 4. Ensure policy and procedures for EBP were developed and implemented, effective 4/1/24 as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The facility maintains an organized, effective facility-wide program to systematically identify and reduce the risk of acquiring and transmitting infections among residents, visitors, volunteers and healthcare workers. The program is interdisciplinary in design and works in collaboration with other programs and services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was clean, comfortable, and homelike. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rooms and environment were maintained in good repair and homelike on 2 of 2 resident care units. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment, dated as last revised 10/10/24 (sic) indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. -Environment refers to any environment in the facility that is frequented by residents, including (but not limited to) the residents' rooms, bathrooms, hallways, dining areas, lobby, outdoor patios, therapy areas, and activity areas. -Orderly is defined as an uncluttered physical environment that is neat and well-kept. -Sanitary includes, but is not limited to, preventing the spread of disease causing organisms by keeping resident care equipment clean and properly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and an environment free from accidents and/or hazards for three Residents (#4, #19, and #26), out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #4, to follow their fall Reduction policy for investigating falls and initiating fall prevention interventions; 2. For Resident #19, to follow their fall Reduction policy for investigating falls and initiating fall prevention interventions; and 3. For Resident #26, to follow their Elopements and wandering residents policy for assessing risk factors and implementing interventions to prevent further elopements. Findings Include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Fall Reduction, dated as last revised [DATE], indicated but was not limited to the following: - Goal: To identify residents at risk for falls and to decrease the incidence of resident falls. - The facility will identify residents at risk for falls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed for four Residents (#53, #54, #34, and #1), out of a sample of 15 residents, to ensure staff provided respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #53, to ensure orders were in place for Oxygen and the equipment/tubing was changed per policy; 2. For Resident #54, to ensure a Respiratory care plan was developed and the nebulizer equipment/tubing/mask were stored and changed per policy; 3. For Resident #34, to ensure nebulizer equipment was clean and mask/tubing were stored per policy; and 4. For Resident #1, to ensure the oxygen equipment/tubing was changed per policy. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration Policy and Procedure, dated as last reviewed 12/6/22, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Oxygen is administered by Licensed Nurses with a physician's order. Orders should specify the oxygen equipment and flow rate, or concentration required as routine or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendations made by the pharmacy consultant were addressed timely and maintained as part of the permanent medical record for three Residents (#21, #9, and #19), out of 5 residents selected for an unnecessary medication review. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. To ensure facility wide recommendations were addressed timely and maintained as part of the medical record; 2. For Resident #21, to ensure the January, February, and March 2024 consultant pharmacist recommendations were acted upon timely and to ensure the January, February, March, and April 2024 consultant pharmacist recommendations were maintained as part of the permanent medical record; 3. For Resident #9, to ensure the April 2024 consultant pharmacist recommendations were maintained as part of the permanent medical record and acted upon timely for Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) testing to be completed; and 4.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored all drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #50, to ensure the medications were administered under direct supervision and not left at the bedside; 2. To ensure medication and treatment carts on Unit One were locked when not in direct supervision of the licensed nurse; and 3. Ensure safe storage of medications and biologicals according to current standards of practice in 2 of 2 observed medication carts. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration-General Guidelines, dated as effective January 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Medications are administered only by licensed nursing, medical, pharmacy or other personnel authorized by state laws and regulations to administer medications. -Medications are administered in accordance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide education, assess for eligibility, and offer pneumococcal vaccinations per facility policy and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for three Residents (#9, #13, and #34), out of a total sample of five residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, updated May 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of this facility to offer and administer pneumococcal Vaccine to eligible individuals who consent for vaccination. -Vaccination for adults ages 19 through [AGE] years old with certain chronic medical conditions or risk factors. The CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] recommends vaccination for those with any of these conditions and risk factors: -Chronic lung disease, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, and asthma. -Residents will be screened for needing vaccine,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN), Form CMS-10055 and the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), Form CMS 10123, were provided timely and explained to the resident/resident representative for two Residents (#19 and #49), out of three sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to issue the SNF ABN and failed to issue and explain the NOMNC timely ensuring the Resident/Resident representative understood the appeal process. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Advance Beneficiary Notices, dated as last revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of this facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage. -The current Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) approved version of the forms shall be used. a. For Part A items and services, the facility shall use the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN), Form CMS-10055.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and implemented a baseline care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission, which included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care to the resident and provide the resident and/or their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan for two Residents (#52 and #109), out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #52, to provide him/her a written summary of the baseline care plan by completion of the comprehensive care plan and document receipt of the information within the Resident's clinical record; and 2. For Resident #109, to develop a baseline care plan for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD- mental health condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by intrusive thoughts about the incident, recurrent distress/anxiety, flashback and avoidance of similar situations). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled The Baseline Care Plan, last reviewed December…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement interventions on the Falls Care Plan for one Resident (#21), out of a total sample of 15 residents to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, dated as last revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. -The comprehensive care plan will describe, at minimum, the following: The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. -Qualified staff responsible for carrying out interventions specified in the care plan. Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure activity of daily living (ADL) care was provided to maintain good personal grooming for one Resident (#46), out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nail care was performed for Resident #46. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Nail Care, last revised 3/4/24, indicated but not limited to: - The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the provision of care to a resident's nails for good grooming and health. - Routine cleaning and inspection of nails will be provided during activities of daily living (ADL) care on an ongoing basis. - Routine nail care, to include trimming and filing, will be provided/offered on a regular schedule and as needed based on resident need and preference. - Principles of nail care: nails should be kept smooth to avoid skin injury; each resident will have his/her own nail care equipment (e.g., clippers, emery boards, files, etc.); equipment will not be shared between residents. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide indwelling catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine outside of the body) care and management consistent with professional standards for three Residents (#34, #160, and #16), out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #34, to ensure the Foley catheter was assessed for removal as soon as possible or determine a clinical condition related to Foley catheter placement on admission to the facility; 2. For Resident #160, to ensure orders were in place for the Foley catheter and Foley catheter care, and to ensure the Foley catheter bag was hung at an appropriate level, below the bladder to discourage backflow of urine which helps prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs); and 3. For Resident #15, to ensure the catheter bag was hung at an appropriate level, below the bladder, to discourage backflow of urine which helps to prevent UTIs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Appropriate Use Indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#109), out of a sample of 15 residents, received culturally competent, trauma-informed care accounting for resident experiences and preferences to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. Specifically, the facility failed to assess Resident #109 and identify triggers of trauma to prevent potential re-traumatization. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care, dated as last revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of this facility to provide care and services which address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. -DEFINITIONS: Trauma results from an event or series of events, or circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or life threatening and that has lasting adverse effects on the individual's functioning and mental,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#15), out of a sample of 15 residents, that their as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication, Lorazepam (antianxiety), was re-evaluated 14 days after the medication was prescribed to ensure it was beneficial and necessary for the Resident in accordance with the standard of practice. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Treatment in Long Term Care (LTC), dated January 2021, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy to abide by state and federal regulations when requesting consent and administering medications. -Pharmacy Consultant will perform monthly medication regimen reviews. These reviews will identify existing irregularities regarding indications for use, dose, duration, and the potential for, or existence of adverse consequences or other irregularities. Any identified concerns must be reported to the attending physician and the Director of Nurses (DON). Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in June 2019 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a been diagnosed with a deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with new orders from the Nurse Practitioner for an anticoagulant medication to be started, the Facility failed to ensure nursing notified Resident #1's Physician, when his/her medication was unavailable to be administered in accordance with his/her Physician orders, as a result Resident #1 did not receive his/her first scheduled dose, he/she was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation and was admitted . Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Change in Resident's Condition or Status and Notification, date reviewed June 2022, indicated the following: -to ensure that the resident and/or his/her representative, and his/her attending Physician/Physician extender are notified of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status -the RN Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse will notify the resident's attending Physician, Physician extender or on-call Physician when there has been a significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a been diagnosed with a deep vein thrombosis (blood clot, DVT), with new orders from the Nurse Practitioner for an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication to be administered, the Facility failed to ensure nursing notified the correct Pharmacy in order to obtain Resident #1's medication in a timely manner, as a result Resident #1 did not receive his/her first scheduled dose as ordered and he/she was transferred to the Hospital for evaluation. Findings include: The Pharmacy Policy, titled Provider Pharmacy Requirements, effective date January 01, 2021, indicated the following: -that regular and reliable pharmaceutical service is available to provide residents with prescription and nonprescription medications, services, and related equipment and supplies. -providing routine and timely pharmacy services as contracted, and emergency pharmacy service 24 hours per day, seven days per week -emergency or stat (immediately) medications are available for administration no more than four (4)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, policy review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the dish machine temperatures were monitored to ensure the machine was reaching temperatures to clean and sanitize the dishes as required per the manufacturer. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dish Machine, dated May 2020, indicated but was not limited to the following: - all staff will receive training consistent with manufacturer recommendation for dish machine use - high temp machines must reach water temperatures in accordance with manufacturer specifications for wash and rinse - dietary staff will record dish machine temperatures on a log after each meal service Review of the facility provided CMA Dish Machine owner's manual, Revision 2.08.A, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - the CMA-180 is a hot water sanitizing single rack dish machine - the wash temperatures should cycle at a minimum of 155 degrees Fahrenheit (F) - the rinse/sanitation cycle should reach a minimum of 180 degrees F Review of the Dishwasher Temperature Monitoring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in April 2019. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 included a Physician's Interim Order, dated 1/12/23 to collect a stool specimen to rule out c-difficile (c-diff) (a bacterial infection in the colon). The interim order was observed in the medical record on 1/12/23 at 4:00 P.M. Review of the Nursing Progress note, dated 1/12/23, indicated Resident #4 had a foul smelling bowel movement overnight and that morning. The note indicated the Nurse Practioner had been in earlier that afternoon and ordered for a stool collection sample to be sent out to rule out a c-diff infection and parasites. On 1/12/23 at 4:00 P.M., the surveyor observed the room of Resident #4 to not have any precaution signs or a precaution cart to provide supplies to care for the Resident with a possible infection. On 1/13/23 at 8:58 A.M., the surveyor observed the room of Resident #4 to not have any precaution signs or a precaution cart. During an interview on 1/13/23 at 9:00 A.M., the Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to resolve concerns brought forward during Resident Council meetings. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes and Concern Forms for January 2022 through December 2022 identified the following unresolved concerns: 1/20/22: transportation for bus trips was noted to be a resident concern and documents indicate residents can shop online (no additional information or resolution was provided). 2/17/22: bus trips continue to be on hold related to transportation issues and documents indicate families can bring in items or residents can online shop (no additional information or resolution was provided). 3/24/22: bus trips continue to be on hold related to transportation issues and documents indicate families can bring in items or residents can online shop (no additional information or resolution was provided). 4/26/22: bus trips continue to be on hold related to transportation issues and documents indicate families can bring in items or residents can online shop (no additional information or resolution was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, the facility failed to ensure that residents had a homelike environment. Findings include: On 1/13/23 at 11:45 A.M., the surveyors conducted an environmental tour of the first and second floor units and observed the following: -The first-floor resident hallway, lower half of the wall was dusty and contained dried liquid drip stains. -room [ROOM NUMBER], on the right side of the room, the wall wainscoting was scraped revealing wood beneath. There were multiple wires hanging loosely from the lower wall. The floor had a large yellow tint. The linoleum tile floor had a couple of gouges revealing the subfloor. -room [ROOM NUMBER], the linoleum tile floor had gouges and wear revealing the subfloor beneath. -The first floor back activity room contained a maroon upholstered armchair that was stained with dark spots, faded, distressed and sunken in at the arm rests. The legs of the chair were scraped showing a darker color beneath. -room [ROOM NUMBER], the baseboard heater cover was scraped and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed for seven Residents (#7, #9, #13, #16, #19, #47, and #159) to address and resolve voiced grievances regarding the television reception at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances/Concerns, dated 12/6/21, indicated but was not limited to the following: - grievances/concerns may be submitted orally or in writing - the person receiving the grievance orally will submit a grievance form on the resident's behalf - the grievance/concern investigation will be initiated upon receipt and a written resolution will be made available to the administrator within five working days - the administrator will review the findings and the resident will be informed of the actions taken within 10 working days of the grievance being made During an interview on 1/10/23 at 11:23 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #7 to have the television (TV) on and the picture was snowy and difficult to see. Resident #7 said the TV reception is poor and he/she has complained about it in the past and has been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for three Residents (#32, #4 and #29), in a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #32, to follow physician's orders to change a dressing for a suprapubic catheter (tube inserted in the belly to drain the bladder); 2. For Resident #4, a. To implement the bowel protocol, b. To follow hospital recommendations for bowel medications following a fecal impaction, and c. To accurately follow physician's orders for bowel regimen medications; and 3. For Resident #29, to ensure a pacemaker was monitored per the professional standards of practice. Findings include: 1. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with a diagnosis of urinary retention. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #32 had an indwelling Foley catheter until 12/30/22 when surgery was conducted to insert a suprapubic catheter. Review of the paper Physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and maintenance record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free from accidents and hazards as possible. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Implement interventions to reduce the potential for a resident to resident altercation between Resident #26 and Resident #38; and 2. Ensure water temperatures were maintained at safe and comfortable levels in resident bathrooms. Findings include: 1. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in September 2016 with a diagnosis of adjustment disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/21/22, indicated Resident #26 scored a 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating he/she was cognitively intact. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in April 2021 with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 12/14/22, indicated Resident #38 scored an 11 out of 15 on the BIMS, indicating he/she had moderately impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed for seven Residents (#9, #25, #4, #48, #29, #35, and #57) to maintain a medical record that was accurate and complete, out of a total sample of 14 residents and three closed records. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Identify and correct a sudden documented change in wound classification for Resident #9; 2. Ensure consultant information was available in the medical record for Resident #25; 3. Ensure Physician Progress Notes were readily accessible for Residents #4, #48, #29, and #35; 4. Maintain complete and accurate activities of daily living (ADL) documentation for Resident #35; and 5. Reflect the accurate code status for Resident #57. Findings include: During an interview on 1/12/23 at 3:58 P.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) said the facility does not have a policy regarding medical records. 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in July 2019 with diagnoses including Protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, and muscle weakness. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #9 developed a shear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program to determine if antibiotics were prescribed for the appropriate diagnosis by ensuring cultures were obtained prior to the start of an antibiotic. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 8/18/2017 with an Addendum for the Infection Control Program, included but was not limited to: -Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) chairs the antibiotic stewardship program. Line listings, trending and tracking of infections and precautions. Review of the facility binder titled Infection Control Line Listing indicated that infections and the corresponding antibiotics prescribed to treat the infections were listed for the months of January 2022 through January 2023. Review of the facility Line Listing, dated January/February 2022, indicated six residents received antibiotics and did not meet the McGeer's criteria (no culture was obtained) for that infection. The line listing culture date, culture site, culture result, and comments section were left blank for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to document the recapitulation of the Resident's stay that included pre- and post-discharge medications for two Residents (#57 and #58) of two closed records reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Discharge Summary and Plan, last revised September 2012, included but was not limited to: -When the facility anticipates a resident's discharge to a private residence, another nursing care facility a discharge summary and a post-discharge plan will be developed which will assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment. -The discharge summary will include a recapitulation of the resident's stay at this facility and a final summary of a resident's status at the time of the discharge in accordance with established regulations. 1. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 for short term rehabilitation following a hospitalization for urinary tract infection and a fall. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#24) received the proper treatment to maintain hearing abilities, out of a total sample of 14 residents. Findings include: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in September 2021 with medical diagnoses including difficulty hearing. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/2/22, indicated Resident #42 has severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 out of 15 and indicated Resident #24 had moderate hearing difficulty and did not have hearing aids. Review of the January 2023 Physician's Orders indicated bilateral hearing aids, supplies labeled in case in room. Resident can manage them independently. Document inserting them in the morning, and removing them in the afternoon, as needed for prevention. Review of the clinical record failed to indicate that the hearing aids were provided for self-applying to the Resident, as instructed. Further review of the clinical record failed to indicate that nursing staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to safely store medications on two of two units. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain a temperature log that reflected a minimum of daily temperature checks in the first-floor medication room; and 2. Ensure medication carts were secured when not in view of the licensed nurse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, dated September 2013, indicated but was not limited to the following: - medications requiring refrigeration are kept in a refrigerator at temperatures between 36 and 46 degrees Fahrenheit (F) - the facility should maintain a temperature log in the storage area to record temperatures at least once a day - medication supply is only accessible to licensed nursing personnel or those with authorized access - medication carts are kept locked when not in attendance of persons with authorized access 1. On 1/12/23 at 10:37 A.M., the surveyor observed the first-floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to assist a Resident (#35) in obtaining recommended dental services, in a total sample of 14 residents. Findings include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in May 2022. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/26/22, indicated Resident #35 scored a 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated the Resident was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 indicated the Resident was responsible for his/her own healthcare decision making. During an interview on 1/10/23 at 1:40 P.M., the Resident said that he/she needed a full upper plate (dental). The Resident said he/she had been seen by the dentist but had not heard what the plan was for follow-up. Review of the medical record indicated the following: -The contracted dental provider's Dental Progress Note, dated 9/22/22, listed the chief complaint as: wants removable partial denture with a treatment plan of extractions and refer to oral surgeon. -The Dental Visit Referral Report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for one Resident (#9), out of a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the wheelchair for Resident #9 was clean and sanitary. Findings include: During an interview with observation on 1/10/23 at 2:30 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #9 sitting in his/her wheelchair with dried beige substance on the left wheel, backrest, crossbars, and left handle. Resident #9 said they did not think the wheelchair gets cleaned and said the staff do not wipe up spills when they occur. During an interview with observation on 1/11/23 at 8:09 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #9 sitting in his/her wheelchair in their room. The wheelchair had a dried beige substance stuck to the backrest, left handle, splattered throughout the left wheel and on the lower crossbars. Resident #9 said it has been a long time since anyone has cleaned his/her wheelchair and it is embarrassing to have it in the condition it is in. During an interview on 1/11/23 at 10:18 A.M., Certified Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-05-08 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the Resident's status for three Residents (#4, #1, #160), out of a sample of 15 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #4, to accurately reflect falls sustained in the facility; 2. For Resident #1, to accurately reflect hospice services; and 3. For Resident #160, to accurately reflect the use of a Foley catheter. Findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in April 2016 with diagnoses including history of falling and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #4's medical record indicated he/she sustained three falls in the facility on 4/11/24, 4/16/24 and 4/25/24. Review of Section J on the MDS assessment, dated 4/29/24, indicated Resident #4 had not sustained any falls since the prior MDS assessment on 3/2/24. During an interview on 5/8/24 at 12:00 P.M., MDS Nurse #1 said she reviews the medical record for each resident since the previous MDS assessment to determine items to be coded on the new assessment. MDS Nurse #1 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain medical records securely and accurately in accordance with accepted professional standards for one Resident (#3), out of 15 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3's electronic medical record contained scanned documents pertaining only to Resident #3. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in August 2022. Review of the electronic medical record documents tab indicated but was not limited to the following: -Informed Consent for Psychotropic document had been scanned into the record 14 times. Review of the document titled Informed Consent for Psychotropics, scanned in on 3/22/24 with effective dates ranging from 8/22/18 through 12/4/23 indicated the document was not an Informed Consent for Psychotropics. Further review of the document scanned into Resident #3's medical record titled Informed Consent for Psychotropics indicated it was a Consent to Treat for Resident #50. During an interview on 5/8/24 at 11:30 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$7,596 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $2,279 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
- $1,899 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
- $3,418 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $210K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225461. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.