Hadley Pointe Nursing Rehab & Care
20 North Maple Street, Hadley, MA 01035 · For profit - Corporation · 154 certified beds · (413) 584-5057 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $85,596 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-17)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 27.0% | 16.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.0% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.6% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 27.4% | 15.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.3% | 19.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.1% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.2% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.0% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 39.4% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.3% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.1% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.57 | 1.88 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.60 | 1.50 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.6%CMS range 34.9–54.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.8–13.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 82.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 81.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.7–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 89.2 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 65 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-01-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) who although they were cognitively impaired, were able to make themselves understood by staff, the Facility failed to ensure they were free from physical abuse, in the form of unwanted and inappropriate physical contact by a contracted employee (consulting Podiatrist). On 01/02/25, both residents reported that the Podiatrist had touched them in a sexually inappropriate manner and their recounting of the incidents to facility administrative staff and the police remained consistent. Both Resident #1 and Resident #2 reported being shocked after the incidents occurred. Based on the reasonable person concept, it would be more likely than not, that Resident #1 and Resident #2 would have experienced psychosocial harm, recurrent fear, anxiety or anger as a result of the sexual abuse since there is an expectation that they would not be touched inappropriately by a provider that had been entrusted to care for him/her. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-01-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP) of changes in condition for two Residents (#65 and #85) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #65, facility staff failed to: -notify the Physician/NP timely of significant weight loss which resulted in delayed treatment and monitoring of the Resident, and continued significant weight loss. -notify the Resident's Legal Guardian of a change in treatment relative to significant weight loss prior to initiating medication treatment which required the Guardian's consent. 2. For Resident #85, facility staff failed to: -notify the Physician/NP of significant weight loss identified with weekly weights, resulting in inadequate treatment and monitoring of the Resident's nutritional status. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weights and Heights, dated 6/1/01 and revised 6/15/22, indicated the following: -Patients are weighed upon admission and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-01-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two Residents (#65 and #85) out of a total sample of 19 total residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #65, A.-address significant weight loss and implement effective interventions when the Resident was identified to have greater than 7.5 percent (%) weight loss prior to a hospitalization. -adhere to Physician orders for monthly weight monitoring. B.-implement and monitor weekly weights as required after the Resident was hospitalized and re-admitted to the facility. -implement and monitor dietary interventions timely when dietary supplements, additional nourishment, and weekly weights were recommended. -adequately monitor meal and dietary supplement intakes after significant weight loss was identified by facility staff. 2. For Resident #85, -adequately monitor the Resident's weights after admission to the facility, resulting in failure to assess the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing as being at risk for falls, with interventions for safety that included the assistance of one staff member with toileting, transfers and mobility, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with an adequate level of staff supervision to maintain his/her safety, when on 06/26/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 left Resident #1 unsupervised and unattended standing with his/her walker in the bathroom, Resident #1 fell backwards to the floor, complained of pain, and was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department where he/she was diagnosed with a fractured left scapula (shoulder blade), and was also noted to have a right elbow skin tear. Findings include: The Facility's Policy, titled Falls Management, dated 03/15/24, indicated residents would be assessed for risk for falls and interventions would be implemented as appropriate, including staff providing strategies to minimize risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), who was severely cognitively impaired, and was transferred to the hospital Emergency Department (ED) for an evaluation after hitting a staff member, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was allowed to return to the Facility once cleared by the hospital, and considered him/her discharged at the time of transfer.Findings include:Review of the Facility Assessment (document that includes an evaluation of the resident population and its needs based on evidence based, data driven models) dated last activity, 01/14/25, indicated the [NAME] Unit (Memory Care) provided specialized care to residents with all types of dementia including Alzheimer's, vascular, frontotemporal, and mixed dementia. The Facility Assessment indicated that Memory Care staff had specialized education and training in the care of individuals with dementia and that the Facility utilized a mental health agency for behavior management interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), the facility failed to ensure they notified the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the intent to transfer and/or intent to discharge and the reasons for the move in writing, and failed to send a copy of the discharge notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, as required.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled, Resident Transfer and Discharge Policy and Procedure, dated, 2025, indicated that before the Facility transfers or discharges a resident, the Facility shall notify the resident and the resident representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reason for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand.The Facility shall send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman and maintain evidence that the notice was sent.Contents of the notice shall include a statement of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations (which included taking photographs), interviews and records reviewed, for one of two resident units, the Facility failed to ensure it provided a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for their residents, when there were visible signs of unclean conditions on bathroom floors and PTAC Units (packaged terminal air conditioners, which are self-contained all-in-one heating and cooling units installed through a wall), located in resident rooms were heavily coated in dust, these conditions did not support that a homelike environment was being provided and/or maintained for residents.Findings include:Review of the Facility policy titled Environmental Services Inspection, dated 03/01/24, indicated:- Centers/Communities will closely monitor environmental services to ensure the facility is maintained in a safe and sanitary manner and assessed on a regular basis.During an environmental tour of the [NAME] Unit on 09/30/25 from 7:53 A.M. to 11:09 A.M., the surveyor observed the following:room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of four sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) who were both alert and oriented and dependent on staff for care, the Facility failed to ensure they were both treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when both residents reported that during the overnight shift on 08/17/25, that Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 was abrupt, rude, did not respect their wishes and treated them in an undignified and disrespectful manner. Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Resident Rights, dated as revised 11/28/16, indicated the facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The Policy indicated the resident has the right to be treated with respect and dignity.1) Resident #2 was admitted to the Facility in August 2025, diagnoses included acute bronchitis, moderate dementia with mood disturbance, and osteoarthritis, multiple sites.Review of Resident #2's Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of four residents (Resident #3) who reported a complaint about being neglected to staff member and requested that the staff member write and submit a written complaint on his/her behalf, the Facility failed to ensure that staff implemented and followed their abuse policy, 1) related to the need to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the Administrator and/or Director of Nurses, and 2) for one of four sampled employee files (Activity Assistant #1), the Facility failed to ensure that a Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) background check was conducted upon hire. Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Prohibition, dated as revised 10/24/22, indicated that anyone who witnesses an incident of suspected abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, injuries of unknown origin, or misappropriation of patient property is to tell the abuser to stop immediately and report the incident to his/her supervisor immediately, regardless of what shift worked.Further review of the Policy indicated that potential employees would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2), the Facility failed to ensure that after the Director of Nurses (DON) #1 was made aware on 08/17/25 at 5:50 A.M., of allegations of abuse made by both of these residents, against Certified Nurse Aide #1, that the allegations were reported to the Department of Public Health (DPH) within two hours as required.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Prohibition, dated as revised 10/24/22, indicated that immediately upon receiving information concerning a report of suspected or alleged abuse, mistreatment or neglect, the Administrator or designee will Report allegations [to the appropriate state and local authorities] involving abuse (physical, verbal, sexual, mental) not later than two hours after the allegation is made.Review of the Report submitted by the Facility via the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS), dated as submitted on 08/17/25 at 10:08 A.M., indicated that Resident #1 alleged that Certified Nurse Aide, (CNA) #1 was rough while providing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, after being made aware on 8/17/25, of two separate allegations of resident abuse (the first by Resident #2 and the second a little later that same morning by Resident #1) by the same accused staff member (Certified Nurse Aide #1), the Facility failed to ensure that after being made aware of the second allegation, that they obtained and maintained evidence that a thorough investigation was completed, including but not limited to obtaining the accused staff member witness statement and/or an interview about the second allegation. Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Prohibition, dated as revised 10/24/22, indicated that anyone who witnesses an incident of suspected abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, injuries of unknown origin, or misappropriation of patient property is to tell the abuser to stop immediately and report the incident to his/her supervisor immediately, regardless of what shift worked.The Policy indicated that an initial investigation would be initiated within 24 hours and would be thoroughly documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1), who had limited movement in his/her left leg and required assistance from two staff members when turning and repositioning in bed, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed his/her care plan interventions related to bed mobility, when on 08/17/25, during the overnight shift, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 turned and repositioned Resident #1 without another staff member present to assist her, which caused him/her to experience pain. Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled: Person-Centered Care Plan, dated as revised 10/24/22, indicated the Facility must develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each patient that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a patient's medical, nursing, nutrition, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessments. Further review of the Policy indicated the Care Plan must be customized to each patient's needs and describe services to be furnished. The Policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of four sampled employee personnel files (Certified Nurse Aide, (CNA) #2 and CNA #4), the Facility failed to ensure CNA #2 and CNA #4 received training upon orientation that included the prohibition of all forms of abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property as required by Federal Regulations, and in accordance with Facility Policy.Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Prohibition, dated as revised 10/24/22, indicated that abuse prohibition training and reporting obligations would be provided to all employees at orientation and a minimum of annually.Review of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2's personnel file indicated that she was hired on 07/07/24. Further review of the File indicated that there was no documentation to support CNA #2 had received education on abuse during orientation, in accordance with the Facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy.Review of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #4's personnel file indicated that she was hired on 08/12/25. Further review of the File indicated that there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), who required medication to treat hypotension (low blood pressure) and had a Physician's order to hold (not administer) the medication for a systolic blood pressure (SBP-top number, represents the pressure in arteries when the heart contracts) greater than 115, the Facility failed to ensure the resident was free from significant medication errors when he/she was administered the medication outside of the prescribed parameter, placing him/her at risk for high blood pressure. Findings include: Review of the Facility policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, revised 01/01/22, indicated facility staff should: -comply with Facility policy, applicable law and the State Operations Manual when administering medications, -verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose, at the correct route, at the correct rate, at the correct time, for the correct resident, as set forth in the facility's medication administration schedule,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of one sampled employee/contracted employee files (consultant Podiatrist) the Facility failed to ensure they developed and implemented Abuse policies that included prescreening and training for prospective consultants, contractors, volunteers, caregivers and students, When a Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) check was not conducted on the Podiatrist as required, prior to providing services at the Facility, and there was no evidence he received annual abuse prohibition training. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Prohibition, dated as revised 10/24/22, indicated that although the policy outlined how potential employees would be screened for a history of abuse, neglect or misappropriation, including checking with the appropriate licensing boards and registries. Further review of the Policy indicated there was no documentation to address how prospective consultants, contractors, volunteers, caregivers and students would be subject to the same screening, prior to providing services to residents at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2), the Facility failed to ensure that after the Director of Nurses (DON) was made aware on 01/02/25, of allegations of sexual abuse made by both of these residents, against the Podiatrist, that the allegations were reported to the Department of Public Health (DPH) within two hours as required, when they were reported to DPH over four hours later. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Prohibition, dated as revised 10/24/22, indicated that immediately upon receiving information concerning a report of suspected or alleged abuse, mistreatment or neglect, the Administrator or designee will perform the following: -Report allegations [to the appropriate state and local authorities] involving abuse (physical, verbal, sexual, mental) not later than two hours after the allegation is made. Review of the Report submitted by the Facility via the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS), dated as submitted on 01/02/25 at 5:49 P.M., indicated that Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-17 · tag F0843 — widespreadHave an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence of a written transfer agreement in effect with a hospital approved for participation under the Medicare and Medicaid Programs. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a written transfer agreement between the facility and the identified area hospital that would ensure timely and appropriate hospital admissions and appropriate care and services for the facility residents. Findings include: During an interview on 1/17/24 at 12:37 P.M., the Administrator said the facility had a written transfer agreement with one area hospital and that she was trying to locate a copy of the agreement. The Administrator said she would provide a copy of the written transfer agreement when she located it. On 1/17/24 at 4:00 P.M., the Corporate Nurse provided a copy of a written transfer agreement with the area hospital previously indicated by the Administrator. The surveyor observed that the effective date of the written transfer agreement was 1/1/25. At this time, the Corporate Nurse said that the facility had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to resolve a grievance timely for one Resident (#32) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #32, the facility failed to ensure that reported grievances by the Resident's family regarding missing clothing was documented and the grievance process intiatied to resolve the grievance within a reasonable time period. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Resident Rights, revised 2/1/23, indicated: -The facility will exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft. -The facility must consider the views of a resident or family group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups concerning issue of resident care and life in the facility. -The facility must be able to demonstrate their response and rationale for such response. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility in July 2021 with diagnoses of Anxiety Disorder, Dementia, and Depression. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#59 and #33) out of a total sample of 19 residents, were provided assistance with personal hygiene. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #59 and Resident #33 were offered and/or provided with grooming assistance when the Resident required the assistance of staff for grooming activities. Finding includes: Resident #59 was admitted to the facility in February 2024, with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia, Type 2 Diabetes, Difficulty in walking, Lack of Coordination, Dysphagia, and History of Cerebral Infarction. Review of the Care Plan for Activities of Daily Living (ADL: refers to an individual's daily self-care activities and includes bathing, dressing and grooming), initiated 2/27/24, indicated: -Resident #59 required assistance/ dependent on staff for ADL care related to impaired cognition and weakness. -Intervention to provide Resident with extensive to total assist of 1 for bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Physician visits at the required frequency for two Residents (#65 and #79) for an applicable sample of four residents, out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide alternating routine 60-day visits between the Physician and the Nurse Practitioner (NP) for Resident's #65 and #79, resulting in both Residents not being seen by the Physician since July 2024. Findings include: 1. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with diagnoses including Dementia. Review of Resident #65's clinical record indicated: -The Resident was seen by the Physician for a routine visit on 7/17/24. -The Resident was seen by the NP for routine rounding visits on: >8/9/24 (Annual exam) >8/15/24 (routine rounding) >9/1/24 (routine rounding) -The Resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -The Resident was seen by the NP on: >10/16/24 (routine rounding) >12/16/24 (routine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to evaluate and revise performance activities for a Quality Improvement Project (QAPI) and Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) when it was identified that residents were consistently missing clothing items after clothing was sent to an outside contracted company to be laundered. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that an effective QAPI system was maintained to analyze the cause for the identified concern, demonstrate changes implemented as part of the PIP, monitor performance, and obtain feedback from residents and representatives relative to the residents concerns of frequently missing clothing items from the contracted laundry company. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Center Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Process, revised 10/24/22, indicated: -QAPI process will drive the decision-making within each Center. -QAPI process and improvements are based on evidence, drawing data from multiple sources, prioritizing improvement opportunities and benchmarking results against developed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and standards increasing the risk of contamination and spread of infection for residents in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. conduct testing of residents for COVID-19 infection, every forty-eight hours as required, when the [NAME] Nursing Unit was experiencing an outbreak of COVID-19 infections. 2. maintain the facility code carts (mobile carts containing life saving equipment used during an emergency) in a clean and sanitary manner. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health Update to Infection Prevention and Control Considerations When Caring for Long-Term Care Residents dated 5/10/23, indicated the following: -Long-term care facilities are required to perform outbreak testing of residents and staff as soon as possible when a case is identified. -Once a new case is identified in a facility, following outbreak testing, long-term care facilities should test…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#59 and #85), out of a total sample of 19 residents, were provided with a dignified dining experience. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Provide Resident #85 timely assistance with feeding, after leaving a tray of food in front of the Resident and out of reach of the Resident, which resulted in an undignified dining experience. 2. Provide Resident #59 with an uninterrupted meal, when staff removed the Resident from the meal to provide wound care and treatment, which resulted in the Resident missing a meal. Findings include: Review of facility Resident Rights dated 11/26/16 indicated: -The resident has the right to be treated with respect and dignity, including: >the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health and safety of the resident or other residents. -The resident has the right to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to uphold resident rights for one Resident (#65), out of a total sample of 19 residents, relative to rights exercised by the Resident's Representative. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #65's Representative with the right to make an informed decision relative to the administration of a new medication (Remeron [Mirtazapine]- antidepressant medication requiring informed consent for administration) when: -The Resident had been deemed incapacitated by the Court. -The Resident had a court appointed Legal Guardian. -The facility initiated administration of Mirtazapine to the Resident without consent from the Resident's Legal Guardian. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights Under Federal Law, dated 6/1/96 and revised 2/1/23, indicated the following: -The purpose included to protect and promote the rights of residents. -Practice standards included helping the resident/representative understand and exercise their rights. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for two Residents (#3, and #32) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. for Resident #3, ensure that personal clothing was kept safe from loss when clothing items was consistently lost and/or not delivered from laundry services back to the Resident. 2. for Resident #32, ensure that personal clothing was returned to the Resident after being laundered by a facility contractor to mitigate the Resident's family needing to frequently purchase and replace his/her clothing. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Personal Property, revised 8/15/23, indicated: -Personnel will identify and record the patient's/resident's belongings upon admission to the Center. -The facility staff will protect the patient's right to retain their personal belongings and preserve the patient's individuality and dignity. Review of the facility policy, titled Resident Rights, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Significant Change in Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments (SCSA) were completed for one Resident (#59), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a SCSA was completed when the Resident #59 experienced a decline in activities of daily living (ADLs) and skin condition. Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, indicated the following: -The SCSA is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed when the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either a major improvement or decline. -A significant change is a major decline or improvement in a resident's status that: >Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, the decline is not considered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for one Resident (#58) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to completed a Level I PASRR Screening for Resident #58 in a timely manner which resulted in the Resident's admission to the facility without determination whether the Resident screened positive for intellectual disability (ID)/developmental disability (DD) or serious mental illness (SMI) requiring further evaluation. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Preadmission Screening for Mental Disorder and/or Intellectual Disability Patients, dated 6/1/01 and revised 2/16/24, indicated the following: -All individuals are screened for mental disorders (MD) and/or ID prior to admission. -The PASRR will be placed in the patient's medical record. Resident #58 was admitted to the facility in December 2024, with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Anxiety Disorder, and Dementia. Review of the Resident's clinical record did not include any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one Resident (#65), with the participation of the Resident's Representative, following the completion of one comprehensive assessment. Specifically, facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan when Resident #65 sustained a fall with fracture, experienced a significant change in condition, and a comprehensive assessment for significant change in status (SCSA) was completed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Person-Centered Care Plan, dated 11/28/16 and revised 10/24/22, indicated the following: -Care plans will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, and as needed to reflect the response to care and changing needs and goals. -A comprehensive, individualized care plan will be developed within seven days after completion of the comprehensive assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#49) for one applicable resident, out of a total sample of 19 residents, who required renal dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys stop functioning properly). Specifically, the facility failed to communicate and maintain ongoing documentation with the dialysis center to ensure that the dialysis center and facility received the most current information pertaining to Resident #49. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Dialysis, revised 6/1/21, indicated: -Patients who required HD (hemodialysis) services receive care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the patient's goals and preferences. Professional standards of practice include: >Ongoing assessment of the patient's condition and monitoring for complications before and after HD treatments received at a certified dialysis facility. >Ongoing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an Influenza (Flu) vaccine was administered to one Resident (#49), out of five applicable residents, out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain consent and/or provide education to Resident #49's Health Care Proxy (HCP), when the Resident's HCP was invoked (evaluation of capacity by a Physician that a resident is unable to make medical decisions). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Influenza Immunization, revised 9/18/24, indicated: -A licensed nurse will provide the appropriate influenza immunizations to patients with patient/health care decision maker consent. -In adherence with the current recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunizations Practices (ACIP) as set forth by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). -Facility staff will obtain immunization consent using Patient Informed Consent or Declination form. -If patient/representative refuses influenza immunization, provide information and counseling regarding the benefit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete an inspection of the bed rails, to identify areas of possible entrapment for one Resident (#292) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #292, the facility failed to complete a new assessment of the bed, side rails and mattress in active use for potential entrapment when the bed mattress was changed from the previously assessed mattress, placing the Resident who had limited mobility and utilized bilateral side rails, at risk for possible entrapment. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Bed Safety, effective 11/28/26 and revised 11/15/24, indicated: -Center Maintenance Director, Administrator, and Director of Nursing will conduct an inspection of all bed frames, mattresses and bed rails, as applicable, as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment. -Inspections (audits) will occur at a minimum of annually and with any change in bed frame, mattress, or bed rail. -Audit components include: >Bed entrapment zones >Mattress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who on 11/14/24, was found with a dressing on his/her right heel, dated 11/12/24, which concealed a suspected deep tissue injury (DTI) , the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with nursing care and treatment that met professional standards of quality, when there was no nursing documentation to support when the wound was initially found, who applied the dressing on 11/12/24, and what if any, treatment orders were obtained from the provider. Findings include: Standard Reference: Standard of Practice Reference: Pursuant to Massachusetts General Law (M.G.L), chapter 112, individuals are given the designation of registered nurse and practical nurse which includes the responsibility to provide nursing care. Pursuant to the Code of Massachusetts Regulation (CMR) 244, Rules and Regulations 3.02 and 3.04 define the responsibilities and functions of a registered nurse and practical nurse bear full responsibility for systematically assessing health status and recording the related health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, policy review, and record review the facility failed to ensure a flow diagram was created identifying the areas at risk for Legionella (a bacteria that can cause a serious type of Pneumonia called Legionnaires' Disease that is often found growing in building water systems and other areas that remain continually wet) growth and demonstrate controls measures identified by the facility were checked per facility policy to reduce the risk of Legionella growth. Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled Water Management Plan, reviewed October 2023, indicated the following: -The center's water system will be described including such details as where the building connects to the municipal water supply, how water is distributed, and where pools, hot tubs, water heaters, cooling towers, boilers are located. In addition to the description, a process flow diagram shall also be included. -Less frequently used areas: These areas include soiled linen rooms, Med rooms, shower stalls, private room showers and empty resident rooms. Also, this includes eye wash stations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and records reviewed for one Resident (#52) out of a total sample of three residents, the facility failed to ensure that a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN - notice issued to inform a resident and/or resident representative of his/her financial liability to the facility when he/she transitioned off Medicare benefits and remains in the facility) was issued to Resident #52 . Findings include: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in April 2023. Review of the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review completed by the facility indicated Resident #52 transitioned off his/her Medicare benefits on 5/11/23 and remained in the facility. During an interview on 11/1/23 at 2:34 P.M., the Business Office Manager said a SNFABN should have been issued to Resident #52 and/or his/her Representative since he/she remained in the facility for long term care after his/her Medicare benefits ended, but she could find no evidence that a SNFABN was issued to the Resident and/or Resident Representative as required.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan relative to falls within 48 hours of admission for one Resident (#75) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Person-Centered Care Plan, revised on 10/24/22 indicated that the Center must develop and implement a baseline person-centered care plan within 48 hours of admission/readmission . Resident #75 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with a diagnosis of Dementia. Review of the Nursing Documentation -V11 form completed on 6/6/23 indicated that the Resident sustained a fall in the last two to six months. Review of the Fall Care Plan indicated the following: -At risk for falls initiated on 8/29/23 (greater than 60 days after admission). Review of the medical record indicated no documented evidence that a baseline care plan relative to falls had been developed within 48 hours of admission for Resident #75. During an interview on 11/2/23 at 1:25 P.M., the Regional Clinical Nurse provided a copy of the Falls Care Plan. The Regional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff stored, labeled and dated food used for resident consumption, in accordance with professional standards for food safety within the main kitchen and on one unit kitchenette ([NAME] Unit) out of two unit kitchenettes observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Equipment, revised 9/2017, indicated the following: -All food contact equipment will be cleaned and sanitized after every use. -All non-food contact equipment will be clean and free of debris. Review of the facility policy titled Food Brought in for Patients/Residents, effective date 5/1/23, indicated the following: -Food items that require refrigeration must be labeled with the resident's name and date the food was brought in. -Food will be held in refrigerator for three (3) days following date on label and will be discarded by staff upon notification to the resident. 1. During an initial tour of the kitchen on 10/31/23 from 7:15 A.M. to 7:35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that accurate information relative to Advanced Directives were documented and consistent across all active medical records for the Resident. Findings include: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in [DATE]. Review of the Resident's Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST- legal Physician's order that indicates what types of emergent treatment a person would or would not receive), signed by both the Resident and the Physician on [DATE], indicated the following: -Do Not Resuscitate (DNR-a medical order issued by a Physician or other authorized non-Physician Practitioner that directs healthcare providers not to administer CPR [cardiopulmonary resuscitation] in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest). -Do Not Intubate (DNI- a medical order directing the healthcare team of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a communication process relative to Hospice services for one Resident (#44) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #44 the facility failed to maintain documented communication that was readily accessible to all staff and providers, between the Hospice agency and the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Hospice, reviewed on 1/13/22 indicated the following: -A communication process, including the method for documenting the communication between the center and the Hospice provider to ensure that the patients needs are met 24 hours per day Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in July 2019. Review of the Hospice Care Plan indicated the Resident was admitted to hospice services in November 2021. During an interview on 11/2/23 at 9:54 A.M., the surveyor asked Unit Manager (UM) #2 where the Hospice information for Resident #44 could be found. UM #2 said the Resident was currently receiving Hospice services and that a communication log was kept on the chart shelf…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement requirements for storing, preparing, and distributing food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen and storing food in one out of three unit kitchenettes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Storage: Cold Foods, dated April 2018, indicated that all foods would be stored wrapped or covered in containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross-contamination. Review of the facility's policy titled Equipment, dated September 2017, included that all food service equipment would be clean and sanitary, and that all food contact equipment would be cleaned and sanitized after every use. Review of the facility's policy titled Food Preparation, dated September 2017, included the following: - All foods will be held at appropriate temperatures, greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit (or as State regulation requires) for hot holding, and less than 41 degrees Fahrenheit for cold food holding. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide dignity during dining for two Residents (#40 and #91) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically Resident #0 had interruptions by physical therapy and nursing while the Resident was eating breakfast and Resident #91 did not receive his/her breakfast meal until other residents at the table were finished with their breakfast. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dining Service Standards, dated 6/15/18, indicated that residents would be provided with a positive meal experience, and included the following relative to meal distribution: - Meals are served by table. - Restaurant style dining is encouraged in the primary dining locations. 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in October 2021 with diagnoses of dementia and Parkinson's disease (a disease causing progressive loss of muscle control which leads to slowness and difficulty completing tasks). On 3/30/22, between 9:14 A.M. and 9:54 A.M., the surveyor observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff implemented the plan of care for two Residents (#30 and #40) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically the staff failed to apply an upper extremity splint to Resident #30's arm and failed to obtain monthly weights of Resident #40 as ordered. Findings include: 1. For Resident #30, the facility failed to provide an upper extremity splint and a fall mat, as care planned and ordered by the physician. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility in December 2018 with diagnoses of contracture of an unspecified joint and muscle weakness. Review of the Activity of Daily Living Care Plan, revised 11/15/21, included: apply splint to left wrist upon arising from bed and remove when back into bed. Review of the Fall Care Plan, revised 11/15/21, included: fall mat to the left side of the bed. On 3/30/22 at 8:27 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #30 positioned in bed. There was a mat on the floor to the right side of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed ensure that staff provided necessary services to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADL), relative to assistance with eating, for two Residents (#28 and #74) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #74 was admitted to the facility in February 2020 with diagnoses including dementia and osteoarthritis (OA; a condition causing flexible tissues (cartilage) at the ends of bones to wear down, resulting in stiffness of joints). Review of Resident #74's ADL Care Plan, revised 3/8/22, included the following: - Provide cup with lid at all meals. - Cut food into bite size pieces .simple presentation of one food item at a time. - Supervision is needed. Review of Resident #74's Cognition Care Plan, revised 3/8/22, included the following: - Break down ADL tasks .and provide cueing/assistance as needed. 2. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in October 2021 with diagnoses including dementia and muscle weakness.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure that staff provided appropriate treatment and services for the care of an indwelling catheter (a tubing inserted into the bladder to drain urine directly into a drainage bag) for one Resident (#85) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Catheter: Indwelling Urinary-Care of, dated 6/1/21, indicated that the catheter tubing was to be secured to keep the drainage bag below the level of the bladder and off the floor. Resident #85 was admitted to the facility in February 2022 with diagnoses of neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control related to brain, spinal cord, or nerve conditions) and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #85 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a score of 2 out of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status, had a urinary catheter, and required assistance with all activities of daily living. On 03/30/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to monitor an Arteriovenous Fistula (AV fistula, a surgical connection made between an artery and a vein used to access the blood for hemodialysis treatment) for one Resident (#31) out of one resident on dialysis. Findings include: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility in July 2021 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, stage 4. Review of the facility policy titled Dialysis: Hemodialysis-Graft and Fistula Care, revised 6/1/21, included but was not limited to the following: *Evaluate access site daily and on completion of hemodialysis . Observe for any signs of complications. *Notify physician/advanced practice provider and hemodialysis facility staff for: absence of bruit and thrill. *Document: status of bruit and thrill. Review of the April 2022 physician's orders, indicated an order initiated 10/12/21, for dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Further review indicated an order initiated 11/10/21, to remove the dialysis pressure dressing every Wednesday, Friday and Sunday. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care services to attain the highest practicable psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#77) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Resident #77 was admitted to the facility in August 2020 with diagnoses that included dementia and anxiety. Review of the resident at risk care plan for distressed/fluctuating mood symptoms, revised on 12/3/21, indicated the goal was for the resident's mood to remain stable. The interventions included; - Observe for signs and symptoms of worsening sadness, depression, anxiety, fear, anger and agitation. - Determine the psychosocial cause for the resident's sadness or depression, and - Social services to provide support as needed. Review of the contracted behavioral services note, dated 2/16/22, indicated the service was requested to see the resident because the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) reported the resident had increased weeping. The note indicated the nurse confirmed the resident had a sad affect especially since his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide evidence that a pharmacy recommendation was reviewed for one Resident (#23) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Review (MRR), revised 6/11/21, included the following: - Facility staff should ensure that the attending physician .is provided with copies of the MRRs. - The attending physician should document in the resident's health record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed, and what, if any, action has been taken to address it. - If the attending physician has decided to make no change in the medication, the attending physician should document the rationale in the resident's health record. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in October 2021. Review of the April 2022 Physician Orders included an order, start date 11/3/21, for Megestrol Acetate Suspension (medication used mainly as an appetite stimulant) 40 milligrams (mg) per milliliter (ml): give 20 ml by mouth one time a day for appetite enhancer, total dose of 800…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-05 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide specialized eating equipment as needed for one Resident (#74) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dining Service Standards, revised 6/15/18, indicated that adaptive devices would be provided to residents as indicated on their care plans. Resident #74 was admitted to the facility in February 2020 with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA; a condition causing flexible tissues at the ends of bones to wear down, resulting in stiffness of joints). Review of Resident #74's Activities of Daily Living Care Plan, revised 3/8/22, included to provide a cup with a lid at all meals. On 3/31/22, between 8:15 A.M. and 8:49 A.M., the surveyor observed the following during the breakfast meal: - Resident #74 was seated at a table in the dining room on the [NAME] Unit. - At 8:15 A.M. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #4 provided Resident #74 with his/her breakfast that included one uncovered mug of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control requirements relative to hand hygiene on the [NAME] Unit. Findings include: The facility failed to implement infection control requirements relative to hand hygiene on the [NAME] Unit. Review of the facility's policy titled Hand Hygiene, revised 11/15/20, included the following: - The purpose was to improve hand hygiene practices and reduce the transmission of pathogenic microorganisms. - Hand hygiene was to be performed before resident care, after resident care, and after any contact with blood or body fluids. On 3/31/22 at 8:17 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #74 seated at a table in the dining room eating his/her breakfast. He/she placed a whole orange slice, peel intact, into his/her mouth and attempted to chew it. CNA #4 immediately approached Resident #74, removed the orange slice from his/her mouth using a bare hand, then discarded the orange slice. CNA #4 then approached another resident who was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$85,596 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $76,278 — penalty dated 2025-01-17
- $9,318 — penalty dated 2024-08-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RW NORTH MAPLE STREET OPERATIONS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/29/2025 |
| WEISZ, DAVID | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| GALLOWAY MA OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30% | since 09/29/2025 |
| RED DEER INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 70% | since 09/29/2025 |
| KANAREK, DOVID | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| LEVY, AARON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| MEHAFFY, RYAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| CHECIEK, ANETA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| EISEN, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| GRAY, TZVI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| KAUFMAN, MENACHEM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| LYNDS, LARYSSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| MAREK, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| MINTZ, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| PHAETON, YVES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| POINTCLICKCARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225697. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.