No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Wingate At Silver Lake

17 Chipman Way, Kingston, MA 02364 · For profit - Corporation · 164 certified beds · (781) 585-4100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (781) 585-4100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (23) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Kingsbury Club, 186 Summer St · (781) 585-1211 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
182 Summer St · (781) 585-1326 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
32 Forest St · (508) 525-2897 · Call to confirm hours
Park
School St · (781) 293-4674 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.3%16.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.7%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.1%15.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.3%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.1%15.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.8%19.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%4.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.9%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.8%21.4%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.9%77.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.5%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.1%11.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.831.881.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.951.501.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 469 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
35.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 35.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 126 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.3%CMS range 55.2–62.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 9.2–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge35.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge26.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.5–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
38.3%
Total nursing turnover
62.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 164 beds and averages 151.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-25)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure three Residents (#97, #51, and #83), out of a total sample of 30 residents, received care and treatment to promote healing of a pressure ulcer. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #97, to implement treatments from the wound consultant physician for a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (full-thickness loss of skin) on the right foot; 2. For Resident #51, to implement a treatment that included an antimicrobial wash for eight months to a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss) on the coccyx (tailbone, area at the base of the spine); and 3. For Resident #83, to implement a treatment from the wound consultant physician for a Stage 1 pressure ulcer (intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable erythema (redness)) on the upper back. Findings include: 1. Resident #97 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with a bunion (a bony bump that forms on the joint at the base of the big toe). Review of the care plans indicated Resident #97 had a pressure ulcer to the right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. To implement an infection surveillance plan to identify, track, and monitor for infection; and 2. For Resident #77, to provide hand hygiene prior to meals and after the Resident handled his/her indwelling urinary catheter bag. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Policy, dated November 2019, indicated but was not limited to: -The Infection Prevention and Control Program includes a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services. -Written standards, policies, and procedures for the Infection Prevention and Control Program, include: Surveillance: a system of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff obtained physician's orders for levothyroxine (a thyroid hormone medication) until 18 days after return from the hospital for one Resident (#24), out of a sample of 30 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Reconciliation, revised July 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: POLICY: Medication reconciliation is the process of comparing a resident's medication orders to all of the medications the resident has been receiving. It is the policy of the facility to obtain and document a complete list of the resident's current medications upon the resident's admission to the organization with the involvement of the resident or the family or responsible party. GUIDELINES: A. Admission 1. Upon admission the nurse will obtain medication history from the following sources: -the referring agency's discharge summary -provider discharge orders -any other medication information provided by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for one Resident (#32), in a sample of two closed records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician and laboratory (lab) work was completed as ordered. Findings include: Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11ed, dated 2019, indicated the following: -The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated: -Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber's that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in emergent and non-emergent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in a safe and secure manner as required. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure medications, including vaccines, were stored at the correct temperature per manufacturer's recommendations; 2. Ensure one of four medication carts inspected was clean and free of loose pills and debris; and 3. Ensure multi-dose vials of medications were labeled with a date opened and a use-by date per manufacturer's guidelines. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage and Expiration of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes, and Needles; revised 1/1/13; indicated but was not limited to the following: -Facility should ensure that medications and biologicals: a) Have an expiration date on the label; b) Have not been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines; or c) Have not been contaminated or deteriorated, are stored separate from other medications until destroyed or returned to the pharmacy or supplier. -Once any medication or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing as being at high risk for falls, and whose comprehensive plan of care indicated that non-slip strips were to be adhered to the floor next to his/her bed, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed interventions identified in his/her plan of care, when on 11/06/24, after moving Resident #1 to a different room, the non-slip strips required to help maintain his/her safety, were not immediately put in place in his/her new room next to the bed, and were not put in place until he/she experienced a fall. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, titled Comprehensive Care Plan Policy, dated as revised March 2024, indicated that a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timelines to meet the resident's physical, psychological and functional needs, is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of the Facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was alert, oriented and frequently incontinent, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when at 4:00 P.M. on 8/28/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 approached Resident #1 after an episode of incontinence and used degrading and insulting language while interacting with him/her. Findings include: Review of the Facility Resident Rights Policy, most recently revised 1/01, indicated the Facility must promote and protect the rights of residents. Review of Resident #1's clinical record indicated that he/she was admitted to the Facility during June 2023 and his/her diagnosis included dementia, depression and anxiety. Review of Resident #1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 8/28/24, indicated his/her cognitive patterns were moderately impaired and he/she was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the Report submitted by the Facility via the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS), dated 8/28/24, indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, for one Resident (#57) of 29 sampled residents, the facility failed to monitor the Resident's fluid intake to ensure that he/she was not exceeding the physician ordered fluid restriction while maintaining adequate hydration. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Hydration (Intake and Output Monitoring), dated as revised July 2023, indicated but was not limited to: -When a Provider orders a fluid restriction due to specific clinical condition, close monitoring of fluid intake will be provided to maintain adequate hydration. -The Licensed Nurse monitors residents on Fluid Restriction -The total number is to be divided between the 3 shifts and amounts allotted will be documented on the intake and output worksheet and on the MAR. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility in February 2018 with the following diagnoses: end stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis (a process by which dissolved substances are removed from a patient's body by diffusion from one fluid compartment to another across a semi-permeable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to complete performance reviews at least every 12 months for 3 of 3 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) files reviewed. Findings include: During an interview on 2/8/24 at 9:34 A.M., the Human Resource Director (HRD) said she maintains the personnel files for all staff. The surveyor requested personnel files for three CNAs, including CNA #7, CNA #8, and CNA #9. Review of CNA #7's personnel file indicated she was hired on 5/9/2022, and she did not have an annual review in 2023. Review of CNA #8's personnel file indicated he was hired on 7/19/2019. His last completed annual review was completed 2021-2022, and he did not have an annual review in 2023. Review of CNA #9's personnel file indicated she was hired on 6/15/2020 and her last annual review was completed 6/2022. She did not have an annual review in 2023. During an interview on 2/8/24 at 10:59 A.M., with the Director of Nurses (DON), Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) and the [NAME] President (VP) of Clinical Services present, the DON and ADON said they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Facility Assessment and interviews, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility wide assessment that accurately reflected the resources necessary to care for its residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Identify evaluation of overall number of facility staff needed to ensure residents' needs are met every day and during emergencies; 2. Identify use of agency staff to fill licensed nurse staff positions; 3. Ensure required annual four-hour dementia training for eligible staff was completed as required; 4. Include resources that would be necessary to care for its residents when a COVID-19 outbreak may occur; 5. Include contracts, memorandums of understanding, or other agreements with third parties that provide services or equipment to the facility during both normal operations and emergencies; and 6. Include health information technology resources used to managing electronic patient records. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment indicated it was last reviewed with the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 13 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy review, and document review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the potential transmission of a communicable disease when the facility was currently experiencing an outbreak of COVID-19 infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure proper COVID-19 outbreak testing procedures were implemented for five of five facility staff members reviewed (Nurse #8, Nurse #9, Nurse #10, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5, and CNA #10); 2. Ensure proper COVID-19 outbreak testing procedures for 23 of 27 potentially exposed residents residing on the Pinewood Unit (affected COVID-19 unit); 3. Ensure COVID-19 testing procedures were followed per manufacturer's instructions for one of three staff members observed (CNA #10); 4. Ensure proper infection control practices were followed while conducting rapid COVID-19 outbreak testing of staff using BinaxNow antigen testing cards; and 5. Ensure environmental cleaning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) completed the required no less than 12 hours annual education for 2 of 3 CNA's education files reviewed, and failed to complete the required four hours of dementia training for 3 of 3 CNA's education files reviewed Findings include: During an interview on 2/8/24 at 4:10 P.M., the [NAME] President (VP) of Clinical Services said the facility did not have a policy for staff education requirements. During an interview on 2/7/24 at 3:51 P.M., the Human Resource Director (HRD) said the CNAs' four hours of annual dementia training, along with other required corporate training were done on the electronic training portal. She said it was difficult to track all the training, she did her best and if someone was missing training, she spoke to them and sent out a text message. During an interview on 2/8/24 at 9:34 A.M., the HRD said the electronic training program was designed to provide 4.25 hours of dementia training. The HRD said to verify whether a staff member had completed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with an environment that was free from accident hazards on one (Elmwood, secure unit) of four units in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that potentially hazardous items were not left unsecured and easily accessible to residents with dementia. Findings include: Review of the Matrix for Providers completed by the Director of Nursing and provided to the survey team on 2/2/24, indicated that 40 out of 41 residents residing on the Elmwood Unit had diagnoses of Alzheimer's dementia/dementia. On 2/7/24 at 8:48 A.M., the surveyor observed the Elmwood Unit bathing suite door unlocked. The surveyor then entered the vacated room and observed that the interior shower room door was fully open exposing the shower stall. The following items were observed stored and unsecured in the top drawer of a plastic cart that was placed just outside the shower stall to the right: -Salon Selectives volume and body conditioner, Warning: Avoid contact with eyes. -White Rain moisturizing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#60), out of a sample of 29 residents, that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice. Findings include: [NAME] NURSING PROCEDURES, 8th edition oxygen .all oxygen delivery systems should be checked at least once each day -verify the practitioner's order for the oxygen therapy, because oxygen is considered a medication or therapy and should be prescribed -monitor the patient's oxygen (O2) saturation level by pulse oximetry to assess response to O2 therapy -assess the patient frequently for signs and symptoms of hypoxia, such as restlessness, decreased level consciousness, increased heart rate, arrhythmias, perspiration, dyspnea, use of accessory muscles, yawning or flared nostrils, cyanosis, and cool, clammy skin, obtain vital signs, as needed. DOCUMENTATION record the date and time of oxygen administration, the type of delivery device, the oxygen flow rate, the patient's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that as needed (prn) orders for psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days, unless otherwise documented by the attending physician or prescribing practitioner that it was appropriate to extend beyond 14 days for 2 Residents (#7 and #95), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses including depression, anxiety, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of 12/20/23, indicated that Resident #7 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15, and was administered antidepressant medication daily. Review of the medical record included, but was not limited to: -Trazodone 25 milligrams (mg) three times a day prn for anxiety (initiated 1/23/24). The prn order did not have a stop date as required. Review of January 2024 and February 2024 Medication Administration Records (MAR) indicated Trazodone 25 mg was administered as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and records reviewed, for two Residents (#110 and #142), of 29 sampled residents, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were accurately documented. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #110, to ensure the medical record accurately reflected the Resident and/or HCP's end-of-life goals and preferences; and 2. For Resident #142, to ensure nursing documented an incident of the Resident bleeding. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST, a document that conveys a person's wishes regarding life-sustaining treatments), dated as revised [DATE], indicated but was not limited to: -Resident admitted with a completed MOLST form. -Is legally sufficient and recognized as a medical order. -Is recognized and honored across treatment settings. -Is an expansion of the Massachusetts Comfort Care/Do Not Resuscitate verification protocol, although MOLST is more comprehensive in that it addresses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, hospice contract review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#145), out of a total sample of 29 residents, hospice services were provided in accordance with the agreement between the hospice and the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to provide ongoing documentation, and maintain a complete medical record of services to ensure prompt and effective communication and continuity of care for the Resident. Findings include: Review of the Skilled Nursing Facility Services Agreement with Hospice, dated April 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: Responsibility of Hospice: -Hospice shall promote open and frequent communication with the facility and shall provide the facility with sufficient information to ensure that provision of services under this agreement is in accordance with the hospice plan of care, assessments, treatment planning and care coordination. -In addition, at a minimum, Hospice shall provide the following information to the facility for each hospice patient: Election Form (Resident's option…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a Physician's Order for a pureed diet, the Facility failed to ensure he/she received adequate supervision/monitoring by nursing during meal service related to the inspection of meal trays by nursing for appropriateness of diet and food items per each resident's physician's order diet and restrictions, prior to the meal tray being delivered and served to resident, in an effort to prevent an incident of choking, when on 11/12/23, Resident #1's dinner tray included an item that did not meet his/her physician's ordered diet, however the nurse did not check the tray prior to service as required, Resident #1 consumed the item, started to choke and required the Heimlich Maneuver. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Meal and Snack Delivery Process, dated 2/03/22, indicated that the Facility will distribute meals and snacks that meet the residents' dietary needs and personal preferences. The Policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2022-05-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility 1. Failed to handle ready to eat food (food which does not require cooking or further preparation prior to consumption) utilizing proper hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination; 2. Failed to have soap available at the hand washing station resulting in staff returning to food preparation without performing proper hand hygiene; 3. Failed to properly store frozen food items to prevent contamination in the walk in freezer; 4. Failed to maintain cleanliness in the main kitchen, including maintenance cleaning of the grease drippings from the over the stove hood and maintain clean floors; 5. Failed to monitor the temperature of one reach-in refrigerator to ensure the unit maintained a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below; and 6. Failed to properly store…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, Resident Group meeting concerns, and test tray results, the facility failed to ensure foods and beverages were prepared by methods which conserved nutritional value, flavor, appearance, palatability, and appetizing temperatures. Findings include: On 4/28/22 at 2:00 P.M., the surveyor held a Resident Group meeting with 16 residents in attendance. The overall concern expressed by the group was hot and cold foods including beverages were not served at the appropriate temperatures and food palatability was not to their liking. During an interview on 04/27/22 at 02:29 P.M., Resident #112 said the food was awful, very bland, and nothing tasted good. During an interview on 04/27/22 at 04:19 P.M., Resident #139 said the food was not good. During an interview on 04/27/22 at 05:08 P.M., Resident #5 said the food was just not good, so he/she ordered out for food multiple times a week. During an interview on 4/28/22 at 11:20 A.M., Resident #247 said he/she had only been at the facility for a short time and the food was not good. Resident #247 said the meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and implemented a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for three Residents (#112, #51, and #139), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed 1) For Resident #112, to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for the care and treatment of a Foley catheter; 2) For Resident #51, to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for the care and treatment of a urinary tract infection (UTI); and 3) For Resident #139, to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for the care and treatment of a Foley catheter. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Updating Care Plans, (no date), indicated but was not limited to: - The Unit Manager creates Care Plans that are not triggered in the MDS assessment - Care Plans are updated as changes occur - Any time the plan of care changes for a resident, remember to update the Care Plan 1) Resident #112 was admitted to the facility in February 2021 with diagnoses which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff met professional standards of practice for three Residents (#51, #59, and #37), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility 1.) Failed to obtain a physician's order for an alternating air pressure mattress and failed to follow the facility policy for weight monitoring for Resident #51; 2.) Failed to follow the facility's policy for weight monitoring for Resident #59; and 3.) Failed to obtain a physician's order for an alternating air pressure mattress for Resident #37. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Monitoring Standards, revised June 2020, indicated but was not limited to: - all residents who are stable and not deemed at risk for compromised nutrition status will be weighed monthly - weights will be recorded in Matrix (facility's electronic medical record system) as Vitals if used 1.) Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in November 2021 with diagnoses which included spinal stenosis, lumbar fusion, muscle weakness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to: (1) Label medications and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable; and (2) Store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments, and permit only authorized personnel to have access. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled 5.3 Storage and Expiration of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes and Needles, revised 1/1/13, indicated the following: - Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors. - Facility should ensure that food is not to be stored in the refrigerator, freezer, or general storage areas where medications and biologicals are stored. - Facility should ensure that medications and biologicals: - Have an expiration date on the label. - Have not been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SCHUSTER, SCOTTIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 07/16/2002
SCHARF, JONATHANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2017
SCHUSTER, ALEXANDRAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
STACK, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SWARTZ, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
DIORIO, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
GROLL, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LOGAN, GREGORYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 14%Other / private 14%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$366per resident / day
operating cost
$11,111per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$364per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225544. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next