Pine Knoll Nursing Center
30 Watertown Street, Lexington, MA 02420 · For profit - Corporation · 81 certified beds · (781) 862-8151 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (82) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $454,052 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-02)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2025-12, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2025-12 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.6% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 15.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.1% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.5% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.9% | 19.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.0% | 94.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.4% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.2% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 38.7% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 16.5% | 25.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.4% | 11.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.19 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.71 | 1.50 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 8.2–17.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 48.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.27 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 69.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
82 citations, most serious first. The 22 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2026-03-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three Residents (#24, #6, and #11) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent a decrease in range of motion. Specifically:1.For Resident #24, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a new contracture of the left fifth finger from developing and then worsening resulting in the amputation of this left fifth finger. The facility failed to:1a.) Ensure Occupational Therapy (OT) evaluated Resident #24 timely and provided therapy at the frequency ordered. In addition, the nursing staff failed to implement the contracture management devices as recommended by OT, and1b.) Ensure the Resident received recommended contracture treatment for botox injections (a medical procedure for contractures where the muscles are intentionally paralyzed) after being recommended by multiple physicians,2. For Resident #6, the facility failed to implement a splint for the Resident's left hand which resulted in a stage four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect three Residents (#20, #23, #26), from neglect, out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #20, the facility neglected to a.) implement wound treatments as recommended by the Consultant Wound Physician resulting in the deterioration of a closed unstageable pressure injury to a Stage 4 pressure injury and b.) failed to follow up on a progress note indicating right hip redness dated 8/28/24, and implement the use of an air mattress. 2. For Resident #23, the facility neglected to implement treatment recommendations by the Wound Consultant Physician for wound care. 3. For Resident #26, the facility neglected to implement the treatments as recommended by the Consultant Wound Physician resulting in treatment being implemented without active physician's orders resulting in undocumented wound treatment being implemented and not implementing the Consultant Wound Physician's treatment orders on a newly identified pressure ulcer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and treatment to prevent the development and worsening of pressure injury's (wounds that occur when the skin and tissue are damaged by prolonged pressure, usually on bony areas like the coccyx, hips, heels, or elbows) for three Residents (#20, #23, and #26) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, 1a. For Resident #20 the facility failed to implement treatments and physician orders recommended by the Consultant Wound Physician resulting in the wound requiring antibiotic therapy resulting in the deterioration of an unstageable pressure wound progressing to a Stage 4 pressure injury. 1b. For Resident #20 the facility failed to implement the use of an air mattress and failed to follow up on a progress note indicating right hip redness dated 8/28/24 resulting in the development of a right hip wound as indicated on a skin check dated 9/11/24. 2. For Resident #23, the facility failed to implement treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-09-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff were trained and demonstrated the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide the level and types of care and services needed as outlined in the Facility Assessment. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure licensed nursing staff were trained and demonstrated clinical competency related to pressure injury/wound care, including recognizing and reporting wound deterioration, evaluation and measurements for one resident (#20), out of a total sample of 26 residents. For Resident #20 the facility staff failed to implement treatments and physician orders recommended by the consulting wound physician resulting in the wound requiring antibiotic therapy, resulting in the deterioration of an unstageable pressure injury wound progressing to a Stage 4 pressure injury. 2. Ensure that 13 nursing staff employee files reviewed received the appropriate competencies, and skill sets necessary for the care and treatment of residents. 3. Ensure two scheduled and actively working nurses were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-09-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure its administration used its resources effectively to provide appropriate wound care. Specifically, the facility administration failed to: 1. Provide nursing staff education and training to provide competent, safe, and effective wound care management. 2. Provide continuation of the pressure injury prevention and care services following the absence of the Director of Nursing (DON) and implement an effective system for pressure injury (wounds that occur when the skin and tissue are damaged by prolonged pressure, usually on bony areas like the hips, heels, or elbows) prevention and care per the Facility Assessment Tool. These failures resulted in the development of an infected Stage 4 pressure injury for one Resident (#20) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings Include: During the survey process it was identified that the Administration's failure to perform wound care competencies for nursing staff that were delegated to assume the responsibilities of wound care management in the absence of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify four Resident's (#24, #6, #21 and #9) physicians and legal guardian of a change in condition out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically:1.) For Resident #24, who developed a left-hand contracture in July 2025, the facility failed to notify the provider that the Resident's occupational therapy (OT) evaluation was delayed 49 days, that OT treatment was not being completed at necessary frequency, that his/her hand orthotic was not being tolerated because of increased pain and decreased range of motion, or that left-hand contracture was worsening, resulting in the amputation of the left fifth finger.2.) For Resident #6, the facility failed to notify the legal guardian of a worsening contracture of the left hand with development of a stage 4 pressure ulcer, development of a new contracture to the right hand and failed to notify the physician of the worsening of the left-hand contracture and development of a new contracture to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#36 and #24) were free from abuse out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically,1.) For Resident #36, despite repeated emails sent by the Resident to the facility Administrator, Director of Nursing and Social Worker, the facility failed to prevent sexual abuse and protect the Resident from psychological harm due to the fear he/she lived with from this abuse and lack of protection provided by the facility. 2.) For Resident #24, the facility failed to ensure the Resident was free from abuse, when the facility failed to ensure after Resident #24 reported that another Resident (#47) kept entering his/her room to climb into his/her bed, exposing his/her private areas, and touching him/her and his/her belongings, which made him/her feel afraid and unsafe. Findings include:Review of the policy titled Suspected Adult, Disabled Resident or Elderly Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, dated as revised 6/26/25, indicated the following: Sexual Abuse: Failure to make a reasonable effort to prevent sexual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure two Resident (#36 and #24) were provided with the necessary behavioral health service to attain the highest level of psych-social well-being out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically:for Resident #36, the facility failed to provide psychotherapy or necessary behavioral health services when the Resident expressed fear and anxiety related to the intrusive wandering and sexual threats of another resident and despite Resident #36 sending multiple emails to the facility's Administrator, Director of Nursing and Social Worker regarding the ongoing concern. Resident #24, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services when the Resident expressed fearfulness and emotional distress related to another Resident's repeated intrusive wandering, indecent exposure, unwanted touching and attempts to enter his/her bed. Findings include: Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 and has diagnoses that include anxiety disorder, paraplegia and depression. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2026-03-02 · tag F0825 — patternProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services for two Residents (# 24 and #3) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically,1. For Resident #24, the facility failed to obtain a timely Occupational Therapy (OT) evaluation and failed to provide OT treatments at the frequency ordered to treat a left-hand contracture. The Resident's contracture worsened and he/she required an amputation of the left fifth finger. 2. For Resident #3, the facility failed to obtain a Physical Therapy (PT) evaluation as ordered by the Nurse Practitioner. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Scheduling Therapy and Treatment Services, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Therapy Services shall be scheduled in accordance with the residents' treatment plan. -Therapy is scheduled in coordination with Nursing Service and is documented in the resident's medical records. 1. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in December…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3a. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute respiratory failure, dysphagia, and anxiety. Review of Resident #6 most recent Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of a possible 15 indicating an intact cognitive status. Further review of the MDS indicated that the Resident requires assistance with activities of daily living and receives respiratory care. On 9/3/24 at 10:01 A.M., Resident #6 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room. A portable oxygen concentrator was observed hanging off the back of the wheelchair, oxygen tubing attached, the nasal cannula was placed around the Residents head but was not placed in his/her nostrils. Staff could be seen walking around the dining room and one staff member remained seated in the doorway. The Resident's back was to the staff member. Review of Resident #6's physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to address the nutritional status in a timely manner for one Resident (#6) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to address a significant weight loss in a timely manner for Resident #6, resulting in a 12% weight loss in one month. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weight Management, revised and dated 10/21/19, indicated the following: - In the event where a resident shows a significant weight loss of 3 lbs (pounds) or more or the weight appears inaccurate, the resident shall be weighed again as soon as possible. If the weight loss is verified the following are completed: - Weights are recorded weekly and taken by a Certified Nursing Assistants. - Charge nurses are responsible to ensure that weights are documented appropriately. - Nursing will report weight loss to the Dietitian within 24 hours. - Report weight loss to the physician during physicians next visit. - If weight loss is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents received respiratory care and treatment according to professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician's orders for one Resident (#6) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, The facility failed to provide consistent oxygen therapy for Resident #6 who required oxygen continuously resulting in the resident's oxygen saturation to drop to 77% resulting in respiratory distress. Findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute respiratory failure, dysphagia, and anxiety. Review of Resident #6 most recent Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of a possible 15 indicating an intact cognitive status. Further review of the MDS indicated that the Resident requires assistance with activities of daily living and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report allegations of abuse within the required two hour time frame to the Health Care Facility Reporting System for 5 Residents (#36, #47, #25, #55, #45 and #10) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #36 the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse.2. For Resident #47 the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse. 3. For Resident #25 the facility failed to report a resident-to-resident altercation. 4. For Resident #55 the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse.5. For Resident #10 the facility failed to report a resident-to-resident abuse.6. For Resident #45 the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse by staff. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Suspected Adut, Disabled Resident or Elderly Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, dated as revised 6/26/25, indicated the following: -All allegations of abuse will be reported to the Department of Public Health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse for 5 Residents (#36, #47, #25 and #45 and #10) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically,1. For Resident #36, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of sexual abuse.2. For Resident #47, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of sexual abuse.3. For Resident #25, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of resident-to-resident altercation. 4. For Resident #45, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of physical abuse by staff. 5. For Resident #10, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of resident-to-resident altercation. Review of the policy titled Suspected Adult, Disabled Resident or Elderly Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, dated as revised 6/26/25, indicated the following: Sexual Abuse: Failure to make a reasonable effort to prevent sexual contact, sexual intercourse, sexual conduct, sexual assault or sodomy inflicted on, shown to or intentionally practiced in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal requirements. Specifically:1.) The facility failed to ensure medications with shortened expiry dates were dated once opened in two out of three medication carts and to ensure insulin that required refrigeration was refrigerated in one out of two medication rooms observed.2.) The facility failed to properly secure medication carts when unattended on one of three units.3.) The facility failed to ensure the medication room was locked when unattended.4.) The facility failed to ensure unauthorized staff did not have access to medication room.5.) The facility failed to ensure lorazepam, a controlled drug, was separately locked in a permanently affixed compartment for storage of controlled drugs. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled 'Storage of Medications', dated 8/12/25, indicated:-Drugs and biologicals shall be stored in the packaging, containers, or other dispensing systems in which they are received. -The nursing staff shall be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to:1) Ensure food was labeled and stored under sanitary conditions without significant signs of decomposition. 2) Practice proper food handling during meals in the [NAME] Unit dining room. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Storage, dated April 2020, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: -All foods stored in walk-in refrigerators and freezers shall be stored above the floor on shelves, racks, dollies, or other surfaces that facilitate thorough cleaning. -Perishable items are stored as follows: Sliced and shredded cheeses will be used within seven days of opening and labeled with a use-by date noting seven days from opening as according to the Date Marking Policy/ Reference sheet. Milk and other dairy products such as yogurt and cottage cheese, unopened, are good until the use by date noted by the manufacturer. Produce will be stored covered. Fruit and vegetables…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a dignified existence for one Resident (#74) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, staff failed to pull the privacy curtain for Resident #74 when he/she was in bed receiving assistance with bathing, which exposed Resident #74 to his/her roommates.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Quality of Life-Dignity, undated, indicated the following:Staff shall promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment and procedures. Resident #74 was admitted to the facility in January 2026 with diagnoses including dysphagia, unspecified dementia and seizures. Review of Resident #74's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicated the Resident scored an 8 out of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment.Review of medical records indicated the Resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Review of Resident #74's current care plan indicated the following:Focus: Resident has potential or actual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to inform residents or their representatives of charges for services available in the facility not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate for two out of two applicable records reviewed. Findings include: The SNF ABN (CMS-10055) notice is administered to a Medicare recipient when the facility determines that the beneficiary no longer qualifies for Medicare Part A skilled services and the resident has not used all the Medicare benefit days for that episode. The SNF ABN provides information to residents/beneficiaries so that they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. Review of the notices provided to two residents who came off their Medicare Part-A Benefit, who had benefit days remaining and stayed at the facility, were provided Advanced Beneficiary Notices that did not include an estimated cost of services should they choose to pay privately. During an interview on 2/12/26 at 10:28 A.M., the Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a home-like environment. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the [NAME] Wing was free from odors. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled 'Home-like Environment Policy', dated 2/4/26, indicated:-Purpose: To provide a safe, comfortable, and dignified environment that reflects a home-like atmosphere and promotes resident choice, independence, and well-being. On 2/5/26 at 7:59 A.M., 10:55 A.M., and 2:24 P.M.; and on 2/6/26 at 6:57 A.M., 7:47 A.M., 8:37 A.M., and 9:03 A.M., the surveyors noted the west wing hallway had a strong odor of stale urine. During the resident group meeting conducted on 2/6/26 at 10:30 A.M., half of the participating residents (4 out of 8 residents) reported unpleasant odors within the facility. Residents reported the following:-A resident said there was a poor odor present like somebody used the bathroom.-Another resident said there was a constant smell of doo-doo.-Another resident said that housekeeping doesn't really stay on top of the odors in the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff completed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in a timely manner for one Resident (#27), out of 34 sampled residents. Findings include:Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) version 3.0 Manual, dated October 2025, indicated:-A Quarterly MDS Assessment is due every quarter unless the resident is no longer in the facility. There must be no more than 92 days between OBRA assessments. -The Quarterly MDS Assessment must be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the Assessment Reference Date. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility in April 2022. Review of Resident #27's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a quarterly MDS assessment with an assessment reference date of 10/2/25, which was 127 days prior. No further MDS assessments for Resident #27 were completed or transmitted to CMS since that date. During an interview on 2/5/26 at 2:12 P.M., the MDS Coordinator said Resident #27 was supposed to have a quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a care plan for suicidal ideation for one Resident (#33) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated 2/23/26, indicated the following:-Place appropriate oxygen device on the resident. -Observe the resident upon setup and periodically thereafter to be sure oxygen is being tolerated. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility in December of 2025 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia. Review of Resident #33's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of a possible 15 which indicated he/she is cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident #33 required substantial assistance with activities of daily living. Throughout survey, Resident #33 was not agreeable to an interview. Review of the Psychiatrist note from 12/29/25 indicated Resident #33 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, for 2 Residents (#47 and #50) out of a total sample of 34 residents, the facility failed to ensure they reviewed and revised the Comprehensive Care Plan following the completion of his/her scheduled Quarterly Minimum Data (MDS) assessment. Specifically,For Resident #47 the facility failed to update the care plan to remove interventions of 15-minute checks when they were no longer being implemented.For Resident #50, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan relating to communication problem, which did not include any interventions related to his/her language barrier.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Resident-Centered Comprehensive Careplan (AIMS)', revised 9/22/24, indicated: -The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family and legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. -The care plan interventions are derived from the thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 60 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Residents (#74) out of a total of 34 sampled residents. Specifically:1. For Resident #74, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was implemented for padded side rails. Findings include: Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11ed, dated 2019 indicated the following:- The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated the following:Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescribers that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in emergent and non-emergent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 3 Residents (#69, #67 and #45) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:1) Provide incontinence care for Residents #69 and #67. 2) Provide assistance to Resident #45 for grooming tasks and removal of unwanted facial hair. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated 11/6/24, indicated the following:-Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs).-Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.-Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide an activities program for residents on the [NAME] Unit. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Activities, dated 5/10/25, indicated the following:-It is the policy of (the facility) to provide an activities program that is appropriate to the needs and interests of each resident that will encourage self-care, resumption of normal activities, maintenance of optimal cell functioning and contact with the environment.-The planned activities program shall be suited to the needs, abilities and interests of each resident. Activities shall be provided in individual and group settings for ambulatory and non ambulatory residents.-The activities program shall include a variety of activities both inside and outside the facility. Planned activities shall include, but not be limited to, exercise classes, recreational or social activities, literary or educational activities, community activities, spiritual activities and continuing life…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#48) out of a total sample of 34 residents received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities. Specifically, the facility failed to facilitate an audiology appointment for Resident #48 who was hard of hearing routinely and when his/her hearing aids went missing. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Dental and Audiology Services, dated 3/25/25, indicated the following:-If a resident has an issue with hearing or diagnosis needing hearing aids, (the consulting audiology service) will be notified and tracked. If a hearing tool is found missing, nursing or the assistant administrator will notify (the consulting audiology service) or the appropriate physical found in the resident's record.-Residents have the right to select dentists and audiology doctors of their choice when dental care or audiology services are needed.-Social service representatives will assist residents with appointments, transportation arrangements, and for reimbursement of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for one Resident (#38) out of 34 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #38 was not left unattended in his/her room in accordance with plan of care. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled 'Falls Policy', revised 9/15/18, indicated:-The Fall Committee may suggest several preventative measures that will be individually tailored to meet each resident's needs.-These procedures will stay in place to ensure that the resident is safe from falls until such a time that the resident can be fully evaluated by the Director of Nursing. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in March 2025 with diagnoses including dementia and hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/27/26, indicated Resident #38 was rarely/never understood and a Staff Assessment for Mental Status indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #38's plan of care related to falls,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify and address a significant weight loss for one Resident (#51) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, once a weight loss was identified, the facility failed to refer the Resident to the dietitian, assess the Resident and add nutritional interventions. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Weight Management, dated 3/21/25, indicated the following:-It is the policy of (the facility) that the resident and/or when appropriate, the resident or the responsible party receives details from the Registered Dietitian on modified diets specific to the resident's assessed needs and abilities. -In the event where a resident shows a significant weight loss of 3lb (pounds) or more in one week or the weight appears to be inaccurate, or 5% weight loss in one month then the resident shall be weighed again as soon as possible if the weight loss is verified common the following completed: 1) Weights are recorded monthly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide oxygen as ordered to two Residents (#21 and #9) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Suicidal Ideation, dated September 2021, indicated the following:-The facility maintains a zero-tolerance approach to unaddressed suicidal ideation or self-harm behaviors. All staff are responsible for recognizing warning signs and initiating immediate intervention in accordance with this policy. -Level of interventions: care plan update. 1. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility in February 2022 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia and heart failure. Review of Resident #21's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident had a score of 0 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated he/she is severely cognitively impaired. The MDS also indicated Resident #21 is dependent on staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that care and services for pain management consistent with professional standards of practice were provided for one Resident (#3) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide pain management interventions as ordered by the Nurse Practitioner for a pain consult to manage chronic pain. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pain Management, dated June 2025, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of (the facility) to ensure that all attempts are made to keep residents as pain free as possible. We believe that, in accordance with the mission statement of the facility to preserve dignity at all stages of the life experience, the control of pain is essential to the continued dignity of life. -Attempts to control pain will be employed until the resident reaches an acceptable comfort level. -The interdisciplinary team along with the resident and/or significant family members shall collaborate to develop the plan of pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#36) was provided a trauma informed plan of care out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a trauma care plan was updated to mitigate potential triggers following Resident #36's report of sexual abuse by a peer. Findings include:The facility policy titled Trauma Informed Care, revised 6/26/25, indicated: -Trauma informed care recognizes that a person's constant interdependent needs for safety, connection and ways to manage emotions, impulses and behaviors is essential to their well-being. -We recognize five (5) guiding principles for trauma informed care. Our organization strives to reflect those 5 values in each contact, physical setting, relationship and activity in all interactions with residents, staff, families, consultants, health care providers and vendors. The 5 Guiding Principles include:Emotional and Physical Safety for all.Trustworthiness: Clear and consistent policies and the honest delivery of service.Choice: Activities offer residents choice and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 Resident (#47) out of a total sample of 34 residents who is diagnosed with Dementia, to attain or maintain his/her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to provide dementia interventions to adequately supervise Resident #47 when he/she was sexually inappropriate, paced the hallways and wandered in and out of peers' rooms. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Dementia - Clinical Protocol, dated as reviewed 6/15/25, indicated the following:1.) For the individual with confirmed dementia, the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximize remaining function and quality of life. 5.) The IDT will identify and document the resident's condition and level of support needed during care planning and review changing needs as they arise. a. Resident needs will be communicated to direct care staff through care plan conferences, during change of shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide social services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychological well-being for one Resident (#36), out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, for Resident #36, the facility failed to follow up after Resident #36 was sexually threatened by another resident to ensure effective interventions were implemented to prevent additional incidents of sexual abuse, resulting in Resident #36 living in fear and experiencing repeated abuse by this peer. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights at Pine [NAME] Nursing Center, dated as reviewed 6/15/25, indicated the following:1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the following resident's right to:b. be treated with respect, kindness and dignity;c. be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property and exploitation.5. Inquiries concerning residents' rights should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address and implement licensed Pharmacist recommendations in a timely manner for one Resident (#3) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist's recommendation from December 2025 to separate eye drops by at least five minutes during administration was reviewed and responded to in a timely manner. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Therapy, revised September 2025, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Upon or shortly after admission, and periodically thereafter, the staff and practitioner (assisted by the Consultant Pharmacist) will review an individual's current medication regimen, to identify whether: -The frequency of administration and duration of use are appropriate. -Periodically, and when circumstances are present that represent a greater risk for medication-related complications, the staff and practitioner will review the medication regimen for continued indications, proper dosage and duration, and possible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four Residents (#13, #8, #33, and #3) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #13, the facility failed to follow the recommendation from the psychiatrist to lower the dose of the Resident's antipsychotic. 2. For Residents #8, #33 and #3, the facility failed to complete an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) assessment to determine possible adverse reactions to antipsychotic medications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Antipsychotic/Psychotropic Medication Use, dated 4/11/25, indicated the following: -Antipsychotic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review. -residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. 1. Resident #13 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide dental services and replace missing dentures for one Resident (#18) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Dental Services at (the facility), undated, indicated the following:-Routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. -Routine and 24-hour emergency dental services are provided to our residents through a. A contract agreement with the licensed dentist that comes to the facility monthly, b. Referral to the resident's personal dentist, c. Referral to community dentists; or d. Referral to other healthcare organizations that provide dental services.-Residents have the right to select dentists of their choice when dental care or services are needed.-Social services representatives will assist residents with appointments, transportation arrangements, and for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program which addressed the full range of care and services, was comprehensive and data-driven, and focused on indicators of outcomes of quality of life, quality of care, and services to residents in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to use a systematic approach to determine underlying causes of problems impacting larger systems, develop corrective actions, and monitor effectiveness of its performance improvement activities to ensure improvements are sustained. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance Performance Improvement, dated 12/18/25, indicated the following:-The aim of this Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Policy is to affirm (the facility's) commitment to maintain a high standard of quality in the way we work, the services we deliver, our relationships with staff and consultants and ensure continuous improvement. -(The Facility's) Policy is to maintain an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections on one unit (North Unit), out of three units and for two Residents (#74 and #6) residing on North Unit.Specifically, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when providing care:1. For Resident #74, the facility staff failed to wear the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing direct care for the Resident on EBP who had a gastrostomy tube (a medical device inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach to deliver nutrition).2. For Resident #6, the facility staff failed to maintain EBP by bringing the entire treatment cart into the room, where the patient had a pressure ulcer and perform hand hygiene. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precaution, dated 8/2022, indicated the following:-Post clear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility provided the COVID-19 vaccination without consent from the resident or resident health care proxy for one Resident (#18) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Control - Environmental Services, dated revised in 10/26/25, indicated the following:-The resident, resident representative, or staff member has the opportunity to accept or refuse the COVID-19 vaccine.-Residents and their representatives have the right to refuse the COVID-19 vaccine in accordance with the Resident Rights requirements at 42 CFR 483.10(c)(6) and tag 578. Additionally, the regulation states The resident has the right to be free of interference, coercion, discrimination, and reprisal from the facility and exercising his or her rights and to be supported by the facility in the exercise of his or her rights as required under this subpart. Therefore, facilities cannot take any adverse action against a resident or representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-05 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure requests to access personal funds for less than $100 ($50 for Medicaid residents) were honored within the same day for one Resident (#15), out of a total sample of 18 residents and the facility failed to ensure Resident #15's funds, as well as the funds of 7 of 18 Residents in the sample were maintained in an interest-bearing account. Findings include:The facility policy titled Personal Needs Account, dated as revised 6/26/25, indicated the following:-Pine [NAME] maintains a separate interest-bearing account for the residents who want their moneys to be managed by the facility. -Accurate records will be kept of residents' moneys and, at a minimum, a quarterly accounting of financial transactions will be given to the resident. 1.Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 and has diagnoses that include vertigo of central origin (dizziness and imbalance) and major depressive disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to offer/administer influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for four Residents (#6, #21, #25, and #42) out of a total of five residents reviewed. Specifically, for 1. Residents #6, #21, and #25 the facility failed to administer the annual influenza vaccine during the most recent influenza season (2024 to 2025).2. Resident #6 and #42 the facility failed to administer pneumococcal vaccinations. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Vaccination of Residents, undated, indicated that all residents will be offered vaccines that aid in preventing infectious diseases unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated.Policy Interpretation and Implementation1. Prior to receiving vaccinations, the resident or legal representative will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was revised by the interdisciplinary team for one Residents (#21) out of a total sample of 18 residents, after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. Specifically, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan after a significant change of status assessment was completed to reflect the current status of the Resident after the Resident had a fall and sustained a wrist fracture. Findings include:Review of the facility policy, titled 'Comprehensive Careplan', dated as revised 9/22/24, indicated the following:-A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.-The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment.-The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will:l. Include measurable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards for two Residents (#35 and #8), out of 18 total sampled residents. 1. For Resident #35 the facility failed to ensure nursing implemented heel booties according to the physician's order.2. For Resident #8 the facility failed to ensure nursing implemented geri sleeves (arm protectors for residents who are at risk for bruising/injury) according to the physician's order.Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated:-Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber's that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in emergent and non-emergent situations. Licensed nurses in a management role must ensure an infrastructure is in place, consistent with current standards…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents at risk for developing pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent new ulcers from developing for one Resident (#18) out of a total of 18 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's air mattress was set at the correct setting according to the physician's order. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Bed Safety- Air Mattress- Side Rails, dated February 2025, indicated the following:- It is the policy of the facility to provide air mattresses, with a physician's order, to residents who are bedridden, have limited mobility, are at high risk for pressure sores on the buttocks/hips or who are recovering from a wound. Nursing will follow these procedures:a. Obtain a physician's order for an air mattress.b. Apply mattress to the resident bed.c. Follow manufacturer's instructions for use and care of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice for the care of a urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) for one Resident (#23) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing changed Resident #23's urinary catheter and urinary catheter drainage bag in accordance with physician's orders.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Foley Catheter, dated as revised 7/15/24, indicated that the catheter size and frequency of changes will be determined by the physician's order. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, urine retention, acute kidney failure, and heart failure. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/19/25, indicated that Resident #23 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status exam score of 14 out of 15. This MDS indicated Resident #23 was dependent on staff for his/her toileting needs and he/she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to designate a person who met the minimum qualifications to serve as the Food Service Director (FSD). Specifically, the facility did not employ a full-time dietitian or have a qualified dietary employee who met the minimum qualifications to serve as the FSD. Findings include: During an interview on 9/3/25 at 11:29 A.M., the FSD said he had been employed by the facility since March 2025. The FSD said that he had attended college and did not complete a college degree. The FSD provided the surveyor with his food safety training and certificate for food service professionals and his allergen awareness certificate. During an interview on 9/4/25 at 11:54 A.M., the Registered Dietician said that she is not employed by the facility on a full-time basis. During a follow up interview on 9/5/25 at 7:54 A.M., the surveyor reviewed the regulatory requirements with the FSD to be a qualified FSD, he said he did not meet the requirements, and the FSD said the Dietitian comes to the facility two to three days a week. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to serve what was listed on the menu for the pureed meal during three meals observed during the survey period. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents who required a pureed entree received the meal as indicated on the menu.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Nutritional Services - Menu Planning, dated as revised 10/22/23, indicated professional planning of standard and therapeutic diets for residents is approved by a qualified registered dietitian in accordance with current recommended dietary allowances of the food and nutrition board, national research council and in accordance with physician's orders. Review of the menu, dated 9/3/25, indicated for lunch:-Chicken Piccata or Spinach Stuffed Sole -Parmesan Orzo -Spinach On 9/3/25 at 11:52 A.M., the surveyor observed the Food Service Director (FSD) serving several pureed meals. The FSD said that the pureed diets were receiving beef in tomato, mashed potatoes, and spinach. The FSD said that it is the facility practice to serve the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the appropriate dessert for one Resident (#42) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, Resident #42, who required nectar thickened liquids was provided gelatin for dessert. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Therapeutic Diets, dated as reviewed 11/24/24, indicated therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care and in accordance with his or her goals and preferences. 5. If a mechanically altered diet is ordered, the provider will specify the texture modification. Review of the facility policy titled, Thickened Liquids, dated as revised 1/16/23, indicated that the center will provide residents thickened liquids with a physician's order, to reduce the risk of choking and aspiration. 1.The physician's order will include the level of liquids tolerated: -Nectar-like: Thickened so that liquid runs off the spoon but at a slower rate, such as apricot or peach nectar. Resident #42 was admitted to the facility in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment for one Resident (#62) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #62 was provided with a two handled cup and built-up utensils for use during his/her meals to maximize intake.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Small Adaptive Devices for ADL's, dated as revised 11/24/24, indicated:-Proper, safe and consistent use of small adaptive devices can maximize the resident's level of independence.-Utensils with built up handles provide a larger grasp for residents with weak grasp or decreased range of motion in the hand.-Cups allow resident to drink with hand tipped slightly forward. This is a safer method than tipping the head backward which opens the airway and increases risk of aspiration.Resident #62 was admitted to the facility in April 2021 with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, dysphagia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and dementia with behavioral disturbances.Review of the most recent Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing accurately documented in the electronic health record for three Residents (#35, #8, and #62), out of 18 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the nurses accurately documented skin checks. Findings include:1.Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in March 2018 with diagnoses including dementia and a history of a right ankle unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/7/25, indicated that Resident #35 had a severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status exam score of 3 out of 15. Review of Resident #35's active physician's order, dated 10/30/23, indicated:-WEEKLY SKIN ASSESSMENT ON FRIDAY THE 7-3 SHIFT, every day shift every Friday.Review of Resident #35's plan of care related to at risk for skin breakdown, dated 4/25/22, indicated:-Staff will document my weekly skin assessment.Review of Resident #35's Skin Only Evaluation assessments, dated 6/13/25, 6/20/25, 6/27/25, 7/4/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to assure residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. Specifically, the facility failed to have sufficient staffing on the weekends as indicated on the payroll-based journal report submitted to The Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) for Fiscal Year Quarter 2, 2024. Findings include: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D FY Quarter 2 2024 (January 1 - March 31) indicated the following: - This Staffing Data Report identifies areas of concern that will be triggered (e.g., requires follow-up during the survey). - Excessively Low Weekend Staffing Triggered = Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low Review of the facility's 'Facility Assessment Tool' dated April 5, 2024, indicated at the staffing plan the following: Total Number Needed or Average or Range of Staff: - Licensed nurses providing direct care 11.5. - Nurse Aides 26. The Facility Assessment Tool did not include Hours per resident days.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was a Registered Nurse (RN) to serve as the Director of Nurses (DON) on a full-time basis. Findings include: During an interview on 9/4/24 at 4:31 P.M., the Administrator said there has not been a DON working at the facility since 8/22/24. The Administrator said he is looking to fill the DON spot. During an interview on 9/4/24 at 9:12 A.M., the Project Manager said he spoke with the Administrator as to who is providing nursing oversight in the building and the Project Manager said there is extra nursing staff working in the absence of the DON who are providing the oversight by working overtime. During an interview on 9/6/24 at 11:11 A.M., the MDS Coordinator said today was her second day working and before she was hired two weeks ago, she was told that the DON was out on medical leave. During an interview on 9/9/24 at 7:29 A.M., Nurse #3 said she is not sure who the DON is in the facility at this time. Nurse #3 said the DON has not worked since sometime in August. During an interview on 9/9/24 at 7:32 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespreadEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one of seven Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) reviewed were not employed as CNA's for more than four months after hire without passing the CNA exam and obtaining a CNA license. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry information for employers indicated the following: - You can employ a Nurse Aide who has not yet taken and passed the CNA test for no more than 4 months. Review of CNA #6's personnel file indicated that CNA #6 was hired on 3/4/24 for the position of a CNA. Review of the Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry indicated that CNA #6 is currently not registered as a CNA in the state of Massachusetts. Review of the facility's as-worked employee schedules indicated that CNA #6 has been working as a CNA providing direct resident care. CNA #6 was working as a CNA providing direct resident care during the survey period. During an interview on 9/6/24 at 9:59 A.M., the Administrator's Assistant said CNA #6 was hired on 3/4/24. The Administrator's Assistant said she was made aware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure for three of three applicable Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) employee files out of five CNA employees files reviewed had a performance review at least every twelve months. Findings include: Review of the review of the facility's policy titled Performance Evaluations' dated 4/18/20, indicated the following: Performance evaluations will be conducted, by the department manager or supervisor upon completion of the probationary period, approximately 90 days following hire. In the case of a job transfer or change in job classification, an evaluation will be conducted approximately 90 days after the change. Performance evaluations are then conducted on an annual and as needed basis. The purpose of the performance evaluation is to let each staff member know how well they are performing their assigned job duties, and whether they have any performance problems. Evaluations will be reviewed with the staff member in private with the opportunity for the staff member to comment. The staff member signs the form to acknowledge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Facility Assessment and interviews, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility wide assessment that accurately reflected the resources necessary to care for its residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff were competent in wound care. Findings include: Review of the facility's document titled Facility Assessment Tool date of assessment or update April 5, 2024, indicated the following: Our Resident Profile indicated the average daily census: 1/1/24 - 3/31/24 as 65.25. Review of the common diagnoses of residents in the facility include but are not limited to, Psychiatric/Mood Disorders, Congested Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Parkinson's Disease, Hemiparesis, Alzheimer's Disease, Visual Loss, Hearing Loss, Fractures, Osteoarthritis, Prostrate Cancer, Breast Cancer, Lung Cancer, Diabetes, Thyroid Disorders, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Pneumonia, Asthma, Chronic Lung Disease, Renal Insufficiency, Ulcerative Colitis, Gastroenteritis, Bowel Incontinence, Skin Ulcers, Injuries, Skin Injections,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement an infection control program to prevent infection. Specifically, 1. The facility failed to develop and implement a plan for water borne illness, 2. The facility failed to develop and implement enhanced barrier precautions, 3. The facility failed to ensure infection control practices for the use of respiratory equipment was implemented for one Resident (#36) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Legionella Surveillance and Detection, not dated, indicated the facility is committed to the prevention, detection, and control of water-borne contaminants, including Legionella. Legionnaire's disease will be included as part of our infection surveillance activities. During an interview on 9/4/24 at 1:25 P.M., the Maintenance Worker said they currently do not have a water management program in place. The Maintenance Worker said he does not know what the risk assessment is for the building and has calls out to a water management company. 2. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program to promote and monitor the appropriate use of antibiotics. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled: The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The purpose of an antibiotic stewardship program is to improve the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance. - Antibiotic stewardship refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. - The CDC recommends that all nursing homes take steps to improve antibiotic prescribing practices and reduce inappropriate use. - Any action taken to improve antibiotic use is expected to reduce adverse events, prevent emergence of resistance, and lead to better outcomes for residents in this setting. Review of the facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and review of the Facility Assessment, the facility failed to designate one or more individuals as the infection preventionist who are responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control plan. Specifically, the facility failed to have a qualified infection preventionist with completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Infection Preventionist, not dated, indicated the facility provides an Infection Preventionist to monitor the overall infections and infection control of the building. Infection Preventionists (IPs) are professionals who make sure healthcare workers and patients are doing all the things they should to prevent infections. Most IPs are nurses, epidemiologists, or public health professionals who work to prevent germs from spreading within healthcare facilities. During the entrance conference on 9/3/24 at 8:08 A.M., the Administrator said the Infection Control Preventionist was the Director of Nurses (DON) but she has been on leave since 8/22/24. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Facility Assessment, employee education record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement and maintain and effective training program per the facility assessment for all new and existing staff. Specifically, the facility failed to provide the required training necessary to meet the needs of each resident. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated as reviewed in April 2024, included but was not limited to the following: Staff training/education and competencies. -Staff members are provided in-services throughout the year and as needed on topics including infection control-hand hygiene, isolation and standard universal precautions including use of personal protective equipment, MRSA/VRE/ CDI precautions, environmental cleaning. Resident assessment and examinations- admission assessment, skin assessment, pressure injury assessment, neurological check, lung sounds, nutritional check, observations of response to treatment, pain assessment. Caring for persons with Alzheimer's or other dementia. Specialized care catheterization…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespreadInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Facility Assessment, employee education record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement mandatory infection control training for 10 out of 10 direct care staff. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated as reviewed in April 2024, indicated: Staff training/education and competencies. -Staff members are provided in-services throughout the year and as needed on topics (see attached list of in-service types). Infection control-handy hygiene, isolation standard universal precautions including use of personal protective equipment, MRSA/VRE/ CDI precautions, environmental cleaning. Resident assessment and examinations- admission assessment, skin assessment, pressure injury assessment, neurological check, lung sounds, nutritional check, observations of response to treatment, pain assessment. Caring for persons with Alzheimer's or other dementia. Specialized care catheterization insertion/care, colostomy care, diabetic blood glucose testing, oxygen administration, suctioning, pre-op care, trach care/suctioning, ventilator care, tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident protected health information (PHI) was secure and not visible to others on three of three nursing units. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA), dated 4/15/22, indicated it is the policy of the facility that all staff preserve the integrity an the confidentiality of protected health information (PHI) pertaining to our residents. The surveyor made the following observations: - On 9/3/24 at 8:05 A.M., the surveyor observed on the Central Unit, a medication cart unattended with the Medication Administration computer screen open displaying a resident's medication screen with his/her medical information. - On 9/3/24 at 10:07 A.M., the surveyor observed on the Central Unit, a medication cart unattended with the Medication Administration computer screen open displaying a resident's medication screen with his/her medical information. - On 9/4/24 at 9:28 A.M., the surveyor observed on the [NAME] Unit, a medication cart unattended with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure standards of quality of care to maintain a resident's highest level of well-being for three Residents (#7, #26, #67), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #7, the facility staff failed to document, and assess the alteration of the skin on his/her lower extremities to determine if the areas were healing or worsening and failed to report the condition of Resident #7's lower extremities to the medical provider resulting in the Resident requiring the treatment with an oral antibiotic for the condition of his/her right and left lower extremities. 2a. For Resident #26, the facility failed to implement the treatments for pressure wounds and non-pressure wound injuries as recommended by the wound physician. 2b. For Resident #26, the facility failed to document thorough and complete weekly skin checks and perform weekly skin checks as ordered by the physician. 3. For Resident #67, the facility failed to perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff stored all drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to properly secure the medication cart on three of three units. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medications Storage, dated 6/20/21, indicated the facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. The surveyor made the following observations: - On 9/3/24 at 7:02 A.M., on the [NAME] unit, a medication cart was unattended next to the nursing station, the drawers were not locked. - On 9/3/24 at 7:56 A.M., on the Central unit, a medication cart was unattended and not locked. The surveyor was able to open the drawers. - On 9/3/24 at 9:06 A.M., on the Central unit, a medication cart was unattended and not locked. The surveyor was able to open the drawers. - On 9/3/24 at 10:35 A.M., on the North unit, two albuterol inhalers were left on top of the medication cart while the cart was unattended. - On 9/3/24 at 11:27 A.M., on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a current hospice care plan was present in the medical record and coordinated with facility staff for two Residents (#5 and #7) out of four applicable residents in a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Hospice Program, not dated, indicated the following: - Hospice services are available to residents at end-of-life care. - 12. Our facility has designated (Name) (Title) (both left blank) to coordinate care provided to the resident by our facility staff and hospice staff. He or she is responsible for the following: - d. Obtaining the following information from the hospice: - (1) The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each resident. Review of the Hospice Provider Contract dated as entered into agreement on the 30th day of March 2023, indicated the following: admission to the Hospice Program, there must be a written physician's order to admit a facility patient to Hospice. At the time of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain informed consent for the administration of a psychotropic medication for one Resident (#7), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in April 2021 and had diagnoses that included but not limited to basal cell carcinoma of skin of other parts of face, unspecified dementia, localized edema, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, venous insufficiency (chronic) (peripheral), and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #7 had a score of 0 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating he/she as having severe cognitive impairment and requires substantial/maximal assistance with activities of daily living including bathing and dressing. Review of Resident #7's physician's orders indicated the following: - Lorazepam (benzodiazepine medication) tablet 0.5 mg (milligrams) give one tablet by mouth every four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (written documents that instructs health care providers of the decisions for specific medical treatment if a person was unable to speak or lacked the capacity to make decisions for themselves) were consistently documented in the medical record for three Residents (#23, #38 and #21), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Advanced Directives, dated [DATE], indicated the plan of care will be consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advance directive. 1. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, hemiplegia and hemiparesis and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #23's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she scored a 5 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (BIMS) indicating he/she has severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for one Resident (#5), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, Resident #5 was sleeping on a mattress that was torn and not in good condition. Findings include: On 9/3/24 at 9:01 A.M., Resident #5 was observed in bed. He/she threw the pad from the bedside rail off the bed, then began to pull at fabric on the top of the mattress. The fitted sheet on top of the mattress was off, exposing the mattress which was observed to be open/torn exposing a thin fabric and foam. On 9/4/24 at 3:35 P.M., Resident #5 was observed resting in bed. The fitted sheet was in place and the top of the mattress that was visible had exposed foam. On 9/5/24 at 8:07 A.M., Resident #5 was observed resting in bed. The top of the mattress was observed to be torn with foam from inside of the mattress exposed. During an interview on 9/5/24 at 8:11 A.M., Certified Nursing Assistant #5 said the Resident has behaviors of throwing items and picking at the top of the mattress. CNA #5 said the mattress has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status (SCSA) Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) for one Resident (#7), out of a total sample of 26 residents, when the Resident was admitted to hospice services. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in April 2021 and has diagnoses that include but not limited to basal cell carcinoma of skin of other parts of face, unspecified dementia, localized edema, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, venous insufficiency chronic peripheral, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #7 had a score of 0 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating severe cognitive impairment and requires substantial/maximal assistance with activities of daily living including bathing and dressing. Review of Resident #7's medical record indicated the following: - A physician's order dated 8/5/24, may be admit [sic] on hospice care and services. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate Minimum Data Set Assessment for one Resident (#67) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility documented that Resident #67 does not use bed rails while the resident has an active physician's order for the use of bed rails. Findings include: Resident #67 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, incontinence without sensory awareness and anxiety disorder. Review of the Resident's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 out of 15 indicating moderator cognitive impairment. Further review of section P of the MDS indicated that bed rails are not used for Resident #67. During observations on 9/3/24 at 8:07 A.M., 2:20 P.M.; 9/4/24 at 7:19 A.M., 9/5/24 at 6:59 A.M. and 9/6/24 at 7:01 A.M., Resident #67 was sleeping in his/her bed. The sides of the bed had side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan for two Residents (#38, #67) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #38, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive pacemaker care plan, 2. For Resident #67, the facility failed to develop an activities of daily living (ADL) for dependent residents care plan. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, revised 9/15/22 indicated the following: - A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of the facility policy Care of a Resident with a Pacemaker, not dated, indicated the following: 1. For each resident with a pacemaker, document the following in the medical record and on a pacemaker identification care upon admission: a. The name, address and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, for two Residents (#63 and #23) of 26 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure nursing provided services in accordance with the comprehensive care plan that met professional standards of quality. Specifically, 1. For Resident #63, the facility failed to ensure nursing implemented the Neurologist's recommended medication that was verified and ordered by the Resident's Nurse Practitioner (NP), 2. For Resident #23, the facility failed to ensure nursing implemented a physician order to obtain a stool sample for colon cancer screening. Findings include: 1. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses that included dementia, dysphagia, aphasia, hemiparesis and hemiplegia, and cerebrovascular disease. Review of Resident #63's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she was unable to participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam and was assessed by staff as having severe cognitive impairment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), for two Residents (#23 and #38) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide assistance with meals as per the plan of care for Resident #23 and for Resident #38. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), not dated, indicated Residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Including appropriate support and assistance with: d. Dining (meals and snacks). 1. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in January 2013 with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, hemiplegia and hemiparesis and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #23's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/15/24, indicated he/she scored a 5 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for two Residents (#67, #2) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #67, the facility failed to implement physician's orders and the plan of care for the use of bed siderails and fall mats while in bed. 2. For Resident #2, the facility failed to conduct a complete, thorough and accurate investigation after the Resident sustained a fall resulting in hospitalization with a frontal scalp soft tissue hematoma and right nasal bone nondisplaced fracture. Findings include: 1. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses including dementia, incontinence without sensory awareness and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #67's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 out of a possible 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review indicated that the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice relating to catheter care and bladder incontinence for two Residents (#66, #67) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, 1. The facility failed to have an order for the catheter tube size and balloon volume amount for Resident #66, who was identified by the facility matrix as being the only resident in the facility with an indwelling catheter. 2. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan for bladder incontinence with individualized, resident-focused interventions for Resident #67 Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy Foley Catheter, revised 7/15/22, indicated the following: Procedure: Catheter size and frequency of change will be determined by MD (medical doctor) order. Review of the facility Matrix (a document that is used to identify pertinent care categories) indicated the facility had one resident with an indwelling catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services for one Resident (#34) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses that include major depressive disorder, mood disorder, dementia, and anxiety. Review of Resident #34's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she scored a 7 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated the Resident has behaviors occurring daily. Review of Resident #34's medical record indicated he/she was seen by the psychiatric physician for an initial evaluation on 7/18/24. Further review of the medical record failed to indicate the Resident has seen the psychiatric physician since 7/18/24. Review of Resident #34's Nurse Practitioner (NP) note, dated 8/7/24, indicated continue in house psych follow up. Review of Resident #34's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#7), out of a total sample of 26 residents, that psychotropic medication ordered as PRN (as needed) was limited to 14 days, and that the medical provider documented their rationale for continued PRN use in the resident's medical record. Specifically, the facility failed to limit the use of Lorazepam initially for 14 days, Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in April 2021 and has diagnoses that include but not limited to basal cell carcinoma of skin of other parts of face, unspecified dementia, localized edema, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, venous insufficiency chronic peripheral, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #7 had a score of 0 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating he/she as having severe cognitive impairment and requires substantial/maximal assistance with activities of daily living including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#9), out of a total sample of 26 residents, was provided the correct therapeutic diet in accordance with the physician's orders. Findings include: Review of the facility document titled Diet & Dining Manual for Extended Care in a Culture Change Environment, undated, indicated: The consistency is the Ground Texture for the resident who had difficulty swallowing and cannot chew their food but can manipulate texture in their mouth and handle soft breads. For the resident who had a stroke and who is advancing in his or her dysphagia rehabilitation from a puree consistency. This is a quality of life consistency offering an option between the mechanical soft and pureed consistencies Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in July 2021 with diagnoses including dysphagia, anemia, hyperlipidemia, hyperkalemia, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #9's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records. Specifically, staff signed off on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that weekly skin checks were completed when they were not for two Residents (#67, #26) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medical Record Documentation - Nursing Care, revised and dated 4/19/23 indicated the following: - Resident treatments (MAR/TAR) shall be signed and documented once the ordered treatment is performed. If the resident refuses the treatment, it should be documented. 1. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, incontinence without sensory awareness and anxiety disorder. Review of the Resident's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) assessment, dated 5/30/24, indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 out of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated that Resident #67 needs assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for four Residents (#1, #50, and #24) of 34 total sampled residents. Specifically:1.) For Resident #1, the use of restraints was inaccurately coded on the MDS assessment.2.) For Resident #50, the Resident was inaccurately coded on the MDS assessment as rarely/never understood when he/she was able to communicate in Swahili.3.) For Resident #24, the presence of a pressure ulcer was inaccurately coded on two MDS assessments. Findings include:1.) Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in September 2025 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/23/25, indicated Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15. This MDS also indicated Resident #1 used restraints less than daily. On 2/5/26 at 8:47 A.M. and 2:39 A.M., 2/6/25 at 6:58 A.M., and 2/9/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff completed the Quarterly MDS assessment within the required time frame for two Residents (#20 and #6), out of a total of 18 residents.Findings include:The MDS is part of the U.S. federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid-certified nursing homes. It is a core set of screening, clinical and functional status elements, including common definitions and coding categories, which forms the foundation of a comprehensive assessment.A Quarterly MDS assessment is considered timely if the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of the Quarterly MDS is completed within 92 days of the most recent OBRA Assessment reference date (Admission, Annual, Quarterly, or a Significant Change in Status Assessment) and submitted no later than 14 days after the completion date.1. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in January 2025.Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/30/25, indicated it was completed 5/26/25 and, as of 9/5/25 there had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-09-05 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted within 14 days after a resident assessment was completed for three Residents (#38, #7, and #28), out of a total sample of 18 residents.Findings include: Review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, Version 3.0, indicated assessments must be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the assessment reference date (ARD) and transmitted and encoded within 14 days of assessment completion.1.Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in November 2023.Review of the most recent MDS assessment indicated that it was completed on 8/15/25 and had not been submitted as of 9/5/25, 21 days after the completion date.2.Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in July 2021.Review of the most recent MDS assessment indicated that it was completed on 8/15/25/25 and had not been submitted as of 9/5/25, 21 days after the completion date.3.Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in April 2025.Review of the most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was coded accurately for four Residents (#24, #42, #3 and #7) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically:1) For Resident #24, the Resident was erroneously coded as receiving an antianxiety medication on the 7/01/25 MDS.2) For Resident #42, the Resident was erroneously coded as receiving antianxiety medication, and not receiving hypoglycemic and anticonvulsant medication on the MDS dated [DATE]) For Resident #3, the Resident was erroneously coded as receiving an antianxiety medication on the 7/23/25 MDS.4) For Resident #7, the Resident was erroneously coded as having a diagnosis of Schizophrenia on the 5/03/25 MDS.Findings include: 1. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 and has diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease and bipolar disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/01/25, indicated that Resident #24 was coded to be receiving antianxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$454,052 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $213,005 — penalty dated 2026-03-02
- $219,077 — penalty dated 2024-09-26
- $21,970 — penalty dated 2023-09-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWEENEY, MATTHEW | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 05/01/2018 |
| WOODS, THOMAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 75% | since 05/01/2018 |
| GOUVEIA, JESSICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2024 |
| MERCHANT, ASIF | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $394K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225049. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.