The Commons Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 399 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 171 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 32 beds and averages 27.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.98 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.37 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 2.11 to 0.94 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was dependent on staff to meet his/her care needs, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provide quality care and treatment that met professional standards of practice, when on 01/23/26, after telling Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 that he/she could not stand up any longer, CNA #1 helped lowered Resident #1 to the floor in his/her bathroom, however CNA #1 did not immediately inform nursing of the incident so he/she could be assessed for potential injury prior moving him/her, but instead waited to notify nursing after he picked Resident #1 up off the floor and transferred him/her back to bed. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy, titled Assessing Falls and Their Causes, dated 2001, indicated the following:-If a resident has just fallen or is found on the floor without a witness to the event, evaluate for possible injuries to the head, neck, spine, and extremities, and -If an assessment rules out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for three of three sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3), the facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate medical records, when their Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) flow sheets were left blank and the provision of care (e.g. bathing, dressing, grooming etc.) each resident required, was not documented as provided.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Charting and Documentation, with a revision date of 07/2017, indicated the following:-All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record.1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in November 2025, diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension and Urinary Tract Infection.Review of Resident #1's Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) flow sheets for the month of December 2025, indicated the following dates (day, evening, and night shifts) were left blank:-12/02/25-12/04/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the injury was discovered, to the state agency, for one Resident (#51) out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prohibition and Prevention Program, dated August 2023 indicated that an injury of origin is an injury that is not observed by anyone, and cannot be explained by the resident. This type of injury is reported and investigated as potential abuse. Further review indicated that the facility must report injuries of unknown origin to the state agency within two hours. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 with diagnoses including dementia, and fracture of the left leg. Review of the medical record failed to indicate a completed Minimum Data set assessment.On 11/25/2025 at 8:15 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #51's left hand to be swollen and bruised covering an area of approximately three inches in diameter. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to immediately investigate an injury of unknown origin for one Resident (#51) out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prohibition and Prevention Program, dated August 2023 indicated that an injury of origin is an injury that is not observed by anyone, and cannot be explained by the resident. This type of injury is reported and investigated as potential abuse. Further review indicated that the facility must start an investigation into the etiology of the injury immediately. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 with diagnoses including dementia, and fracture of the left leg. Review of the medical record failed to indicate a completed Minimum Data set assessment.On 11/25/2025 at 8:15 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #51's left hand to be swollen and bruised covering an area of approximately three inches in diameter. During an interview on 11/25/2025 at 8:15 A.M., Resident #51 said that the area hurts and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility to ensure that services provided met professional standards for one Resident (#39), out of 17 total sampled residents. Specifically, for Resident #39, the facility failed to complete a baseline AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) assessment upon admission when prescribed an antipsychotic medication. Findings include: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 with diagnoses that included depression and anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13 out of 15, indicating that the Resident is cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS indicated that the Resident takes antipsychotic medications. Review of physician's orders indicated the following:Aripiprazole (an antipsychotic medication) 10 mg (milligrams) once daily for major depressive disorder, single episode, severe without psychotic features, updated 11/21/25. Review of the November 2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with Nursing professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to accurately transcribe physician's orders for one Resident (#8) out of a sample of 17 Residents.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy titled 'Charting and Documentation' with a revision date of July 2017 indicated the following:-All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record.-Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), and accurate.Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses including dysphagia.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] did not indicate a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score because the Resident is rarely/never understood.Further review of the MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0847 — isolated
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement explicitly stated that neither the resident nor his or her representative is required to sign an agreement for binding arbitration as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at, the facility. Findings include: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, heart failure and cancer. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #24 was moderately cognitively impaired, scoring a 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam. Review of the facility document titled Massachusetts Health care Proxy dated 10/1/25 indicated that Resident #24's family member was the designated health care proxy. Review of the facility document titled Activation of Health Care Proxy/Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care, indicated that the health care proxy was activated on 10/15/25. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0848 — isolated
  Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement provides for the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties. The binding arbitration agreement must allow for the selection of a venue that is suitable in meeting the needs of both the resident or his or her representative, and the facility. Findings include:Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, heart failure and cancer. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #24 was moderately cognitively impaired, scoring a 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam. Review of the facility document titled Massachusetts Health care Proxy dated 10/1/25 indicated that Resident #24's family member was the designated health care proxy. Review of the facility document titled Activation of Health Care Proxy/Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care, indicated that the health care proxy was activated on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices. Specifically,1. The facility failed to use appropriate hand hygiene and use PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) in a room with Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) for one Resident (#8) out of a sample of 17 Residents.2. The facility failed to maintain infection control practices consistent with professional standards during the medication pass. Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled 'Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a revision date of March 2024 indicated the following: -Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are utilized to reduce the transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. -EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use in addition to standard precautions during high contact care activity (as opposed to before entering the room). -Examples of high contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for EBPs include device care or use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- screen to determine if a resident had an intellectual or developmental disability and/or serious mental illness and needed further evaluation) for two Residents (#3 and #16), out of a total sample of 15 residents. Findings include: 1.For Resident #3 the facility failed to complete a level 1 preadmission screening and Resident Review. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of Resident #3 most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of possible 15 indicating he/she was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS indicated the Resident did not have any behaviors no hallucinations or delusions and had an active diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of Resident #3's medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JUSTLIVING COMMUNITIES — 2 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes:

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA