Julian J Levitt Family Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 507 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 228 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 182.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who's comprehensive care plan indicated he/she required assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed interventions in his/her care plan, when on 04/28/24 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 provided care to Resident #1, who was in bed, without another staff member present to assist her. CNA #1 rolled Resident #1 on his/her side, away from her, Resident #1 rolled off the bed, fell onto the floor, landing on his/her right side and immediately complained of pain. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) and diagnosed with acute non-displaced (stable) fractures of the right superior and inferior pubic rami (group of bones that make up the pelvis). Findings include: Review of the Facility's undated policy, titled Care Plans-Comprehensive, indicated residents will have a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance and required assistive device (bilateral side rails) to maintain his/her safety and prevent an incident/accident resulting in an injury, when on 04/28/24 during the provision of care, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, who had not gotten another staff member to assist her, put the side rails down, rolled Resident #1 on to his/her side in bed, Resident #1 rolled off the bed onto the floor, landing on his/her right side and immediately complained of pain. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) and diagnosed with acute non-displaced (stable) fractures of the right superior and inferior pubic rami (group of bones that make up the pelvis). Findings include: Review of the Facility's undated policy for Activities of Daily Living (ADL), indicated in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement a system of surveillance for infection tracking, placing residents at risk for inadequate infection monitoring and spread of infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Maintain an up-to-date infection line listing for tracking incidents of infection in the facility when the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Plan indicated an up-to-date infection line listing would be maintained. -Include required information on the infection line listing for infection monitoring and tracking. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control Guidelines for all Nursing Procedures, dated February 2014, indicated the following: -The purpose was to provide guidelines for general infection control while caring for residents. -The Infection Control Nurse, interchangeable referred to as Infection Preventionist (IP), and/or the Director of Nursing (DON) are responsible for the Infection Control Program in the facility. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Plan, undated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure personal care was provided with respect and dignity, in a manner to maintain and enhance quality of life for one Resident (#539) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure that Resident #539 was covered/clothed as requested by the Resident when during personal care, staff left the Resident exposed and uncovered in his/her bed, when the Resident required assistance from staff for personal care, resulting in the Resident feeling disrespected and dehumanized. -Ensure a timely response to Resident #539's undignified experience which increased the Resident's risk for further undignified experiences at the facility. Findings include: Resident #539 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses including Osteoarthritis of bilateral knees, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, need for assistance with personal care, Osteoarthritis of the right shoulder, pain in right shoulder, and pain in right knee. Review of Resident #539's At Risk Care Plan initiated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to refer one Resident (#77) for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a federal and state-required process that is designed to, among other things, identify evidence of serious mental illness [SMI] and/or intellectual or developmental disabilities [ID/DD] in all individuals [regardless of source of payment] seeking admission to Medicaid-or Medicare-certified nursing facilities) Level II Evaluation (an evaluation conducted to determine if an individual with a newly evident or possible SMI, ID, or a related condition for Level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, for Resident #77, the facility failed to refer the Resident for a Level II PASRR Evaluation after receiving a new diagnosis of Psychosis. Findings include: Resident #77 was admitted to the facility in December 2017 with diagnoses including history of alcohol abuse and Depression. Review of the Diagnosis List indicated Resident #77 has the following current diagnoses in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#52) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, out of total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, for Resident #52, the facility failed to follow-up with a recommendation made by the Ophthalmologist to increase the use of Refresh Optive Ophthalmic (a preservative-free eye drop designed to relieve dry eye symptoms) from two times per day to four times per day. Findings include: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses including Myasthenia Gravis and Dementia. Review of the Provider Encounter Progress Note, dated 1/9/25, indicated the following in part: -Patient had bilateral ectropion (condition in which your eyelid turns outward) with retracted lower lid history of recurrent conjunctivitis (eye infection) . Review of the Ophthalmologist Report of Consultation, dated 3/10/25, indicated the following: -Recommended to use Refresh Optive in both eyes four times a day -Consultant signature -Provider initials Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide treatment for hearing loss for one Resident (#121), out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure recommendations made from the Audiologist (professional that specializes in diagnosing, treating, and managing hearing loss and balance disorders) were implemented for Resident #121 in order to improve his/her hearing ability. Findings include: Resident #121 was admitted to the facility in October 2021 with diagnoses including need for assistance with personal care and hearing loss. Review of the Cognitive Impairment/Communication Care Plan initiated 5/10/22, indicated Resident #121: -had an alteration in communication due to difficulty hearing, and included the following interventions also initiated 5/10/22: >Audiology Consult as needed. >Use assistive hearing device as needed. >Utilize communication board/paper as needed. Review of the Request for Service Form, signed by Resident #121 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records review, and interviews, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services as ordered by the Physician for one Resident (#143) of five applicable residents, out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services as ordered by the Physician, to check Resident #143's Keppra (Levetiracetam: medication used to manage seizures) level, placing the Resident at risk for inadequate medication monitoring and complications related to medication use. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Lab and Diagnostic Test Results - Clinical Protocol, undated, indicated the following: -The physician will identify, and order diagnostic and lab testing based on diagnostic and monitoring needs. -The reason for getting a test often affects the urgency of acting upon the result. Resident #143 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses including Epilepsy. Review of Resident #143's Final Levetiracetam Level Result, drawn 2/27/25 with results obtained on 3/3/25, indicated the Resident's Levetiracetam level was 4.5 ug…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for three Residents (#155, #533, and #423) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #155, the facility failed to record the Resident's post void residual (PVR: amount of urine remaining in the bladder after one urinates) when PVRs were ordered to monitor the Resident's Kidney Disease, placing the Resident at risk for inadequate monitoring of his/her medical condition. 2.For Resident # 533, the facility failed to document the administration of a newly ordered dose of Lasix (diuretic medication that helps reduce fluid buildup in the body), when the Resident experienced symptoms of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF: type of heart failure that occurs when the heart cannot pump blood as well as it should), placing the Resident at risk for inadequate monitoring of his/her medical condition. 3. For Resident #423, the facility failed to document the administration of PRN (as needed)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required the use of a Hoyer lift (mechanical mobility aid that supports a person's body weight to allow movement from one surface to another), the Facility failed to ensure his/her environment was as free of incidents/accidents as possible, when on 11/19/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #3 and CNA #4, who had set up and prepared him/her for transfer out of bed, did not properly set up (position of the legs/base) the Hoyer lift, as they transferred Resident #1 the lift started to tip over sideways, Resident #1 was lowered to the floor by staff during the incident, and the Hoyer lift completely tipped over landing on the floor next to the resident. Findings include: Review of the Battery Operated Patient Lift Owners manual (specific to the Hoyer lifts the Facility utilized), provided to the surveyor by the Facility, indicated the following instructions to transfer a person from bed: - Open the base (legs) and move the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2), who were severely cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2's right to personal privacy was respected, when on 03/14/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 used her personal cell phone to participate in a non-work related, live video call, while providing care to Resident #1 and Resident #2, without the consent of the residents or their representatives. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Residents Rights Policy, undated, indicated the resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. The Policy indicated that the Federal and State laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of the facility, these rights include the resident's right to privacy and confidentiality. The Policy indicated the Facility would make every effort to assist each resident in exercising his/her rights to assure that the resident is always treated with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate medical records were maintained for five Residents (#21, #141, #78, and #262) out of a total sample of 35 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1. For Resident #21, ensure Physician's orders accurately indicated the process for maintaining the Resident's enteral nutrition (a form of nutrition delivered into the digestive system as a liquid/ also referred to as tube feed) on dialysis (treatment used to treat end stage renal disease[ESRD]) days and the Resident's total amount of enteral nutrition formula consumed daily was documented each shift as ordered. 2. For Residents #141, #78, and #262, ensure the Residents Advanced Directives (wishes a person makes regarding end of life care) decisions made on their Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST- document that provides specific instruction on medical care one wishes to receive or not receive) was documented accurately throughout the medical record. Findings include: 1. For Resident #21 the facility failed to ensure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,468 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,468 — penalty dated 2024-05-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CHELSEA JEWISH LIFECARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 85 rows in the source record cover these 42 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA