Abbott Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 43.6 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to implement the infection prevention and control program. Specifically, the facility failed to implement an infection control surveillance plan for identifying, tracking, monitoring and/or reporting of infections, communicable diseases and outbreaks among residents and staff. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Infection Control, undated, indicated the following: -The facility has an established infection control program which has been designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. Infection Control Program -Investigates, controls, and prevents infection in the facility. -Decides what procedures, such as isolation, should be applied to an individual resident and maintains a record of incidents and corrective actions related to infections. Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Manual, dated 10/4/20, indicated the following: -The Infection Preventionist (IP) will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures for the investigation of allegations of abuse, protection of residents during investigations, reporting of allegations and investigative findings, and taking corrective actions to protect other residents from potential abuse, for one Resident (#192), out of a total sample of 13 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, & Exploitation, dated 8/1/22, indicated, but was not limited to: -The Facility will provide an environment in which the resident is free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of resident property, or exploitation, including but not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, and voluntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraint that is not required to treat their residents' medical symptoms. -Performing internal facility investigations of alleged violations and identification of staff members responsible for investigating incidents and the reporting of the same to proper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to report allegations of potential abuse (injuries of unknown source) to the State Agency for one Resident (#192) out of a total sample of 13 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, & Exploitation, dated 8/1/22, indicated, but was not limited to: -Reporting of all alleged violations of resident abuse to appropriate per state agencies utilizing the proper online reporting system with the same with the simultaneous development of corrective actions determined as part of the internal facility investigation to prevent further occurrences of abuse. -The executive director shall assume the overall responsibility to ensure that incident reports are accurately completed and personal statements are obtained timely to ensure proper completion of the internal facility investigation the executive director shall ensure that the appropriate agency agencies are notified in writing as warranted of abuse allegations in all investigatory findings by utilizing the state…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to Initiate an investigation of an alleged violation of abuse including injuries of unknown source for one Resident (#192) out of a total sample of 13 residents. Specifically for Resident #192 who on 5/19/25, was found to have bruising and open skin areas to his/her upper extremities, the facility failed to prevent further potential abuse or mistreatment while the investigation of an alleged violation is in progress. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, & Exploitation, dated 8/1/22, indicated, but was not limited to: -The Facility will provide an environment in which the resident is free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of resident property, or exploitation, including but not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, and voluntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraint that is not required to treat their residents' medical symptoms. -Performing internal facility investigations of alleged violations and identification of staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide care, consistent with professional standards of practice one Resident (#192) out of a total sample of 13 residents. Specifically, for Resident #192 the facility failed to identify a change in his/her skin condition and failed to ensure weekly skin checks were completed. Findings include: Resident #192 was admitted to the facility in May 2025 and has diagnoses that include muscle weakness, osteoarthritis of right and left knee (joint disease), thrombocytopenia (low platelet count), dementia and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/11/25, indicated that Resident #192 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, and required substantial/maximum assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the Nursing admission progress note dated 5/5/25, indicated the following: Skin check which revealed Stage 1 pressure ulcer to left buttocks and bilateral heels. New order for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to formulate an advance directive for one Resident (#5) out of a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to initiate the court process to renew an expired [NAME] guardianship (a treatment plan that states that antipsychotic medications are so intrusive, and their side effects are potentially so severe, that a court must approve them). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Advanced Care Planning' revised [DATE] indicated the following: - Advance Directives-written or verbal directions related to specific treatment choices that communicate the resident's preferences about designation of a decision making proxy. - A resident/patient's role in advance care planning depends on the extent of their decision-making capacity. - A resident's/patient's role in advance care planning depends on their decision-making capacity, family considerations and other factors. A resident/patient may still be able to participate to some…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for residents who are dependent on staff for one Resident (#22) out of a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide supervision while eating for Resident #22. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, dated 1/1/15, indicated the following: - A program of ADLs is provided to residents by the following method: The ability of each resident to meet the demands of daily living is assessed by a licensed nurse and/or member of the interdisciplinary team. A program of assistance and instruction in ADL skills is implemented. - Feeding: Meals are planned considering needs and desires of residents. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in August 2021 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, aphasia and dysphagia. Review of Resident #22's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow up with recommendations made by the Audiologist for one Resident (#17) out of a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically, for Resident #17 the facility failed to follow up with the Audiologist's recommendation to remove ear wax from the Resident's right ear within a reasonable amount of time. Findings include: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility in November 2021 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #17's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 0 out of 15 indicating that he/she has severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated that Resident #17 has not refused care and is dependent for all activities of daily living. Review of Resident #17's physician's order dated 8/8/22 indicated the following: - Audiologist consult as needed. Review of Resident #17's form titled Request…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, policy review and record review the facility failed to maintain respiratory equipment according to professional standards of practice for two Residents (#289 and #9), out of a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #289 the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of a continuous positive airway pressure machine (CPAP, machine used to treat sleep apnea). 2. For Resident #9, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen concentrator filter was clean. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled CPAP Management, dated as revised 12/28/22, indicated nursing will provide CPAP to treat sleep apnea or sleep disorders as ordered by the physician. Resident #289 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses including vascular dementia, coronary artery disease, and sleep apnea (interrupted breathing during sleep). On 6/4/24 at 7:42 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #289 in bed with a CPAP at bedside. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide food in a form that meets the needs of one Resident (#22) out of a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically, for Resident #22 the facility failed to provide food in a cut-up texture as ordered by the physician. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Texture and Consistency-Modified Diets, undated, indicated the following: - Policy: Texture and consistency-modified diets will be individualized with modifications made by the speech/language pathologist and physician in conjunction with the registered dietitian or designee and director of food and nutrition services. A written order is needed. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in August 2021 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, aphasia and dysphagia. Review of Resident #22's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 0 out of a possible 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $600K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA