Devereux Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 51.0 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#1), out of a total sample of 14 residents that a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication order included a duration for continued use. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Management, effective date 10/14/2017 indicated the following:Policy:Each resident's drug regimen will be free from unnecessary drugs. Administration of psychoactive medications will focus on the individual needs of the resident and will be prescribed only when necessary and clinically indicated to treat specific conditions and symptoms as diagnoses and documented. Psychoactive medication management will include implementation of behavioral interventions, gradual dose reductions attempts, and adequate monitoring that complies with Federal and State guidelines.Protocol included but was not limited to the following:-PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days (except as noted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide routine dental services for one Resident (#26) out of a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically, for Resident #26, the facility failed to address and initiate replacement of lost/missing lower dentures timely. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled 'Lost or Damaged Dentures', dated 10/1/17, indicated:- It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents found to have lost or damaged dentures while in the facility receive an adequate replacement, along with prompt dental services as outlined below.- Staff/resident/family must notify the charge nurse and the Social Service Director/Designee immediately of any missing or damaged dental appliance. An investigation into how the item/items were lost or damaged will be initiated promptly. - Within 3 days following confirmation of lost or damaged dentures/partials or other removable dental work, the Director of Social Services/Designee must make a referral for appropriate dental services for repair and/or replacement. Resident #26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for one Resident (#2), out of a total of 14 sampled residents.Findings include:Review of the Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy dated March 2024 indicated:-Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO).- Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities.-An order for EBP will be obtained for any residents with any of the following: wounds, and/or indwelling medical devices (e.g. central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, tracheostomy/ventilator tubes) even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with an MDRO. Review of United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 and has diagnoses that include Severe Vascular Dementia with Agitation. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/05/24, indicated that on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam Resident #19 scored a 6 out of a possible 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated Resident #19 had no behavior of rejecting care, required supervision or touching assistance with eating and had complaints of difficulty or pain when swallowing. Review of the Quarterly Nursing Assessment, dated 7/05/24, indicated Resident #19 requires supervision or touching assistance for eating. Review of the current CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) Kardex (document that explains each resident's plan of care to the CNAs), indicated Resident #19 requires continual supervision for eating and is on Aspiration (when food or drink goes into your airway rather than your esophagus) Precautions. Review of Resident #19 ADL care plan included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Physician/Nurse Practitioner were notified of recommendations made by a Wound Physician for one Resident (#1) out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, for Resident #1 who had facility acquired pressure injuries, the facility failed to ensure the Physician/Nurse Practitioner were notified of recommendations made by the Wound Physician on 10/6/23 and 10/11/23, and the Resident was subsequently hospitalized on [DATE] with a wound infection. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 and current diagnoses include dementia and facility acquired pressure ulcer of the right heel. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/7/24, indicated Resident #1 was assessed by staff to have severely impaired cognition. Review of the MDS, dated [DATE], indicated the following: -Resident has a stage 1 or greater, a scar over a bony prominence, or a non removable dressing/device. -Has one or more…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was implemented for one Resident (#6) out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, for Resident #6, the facility failed to ensure his/her weight was obtained weekly, as ordered. Findings Include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in February 2022 with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, and dementia. Review of Resident #6's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/19/24, indicated Resident #6 scored a 12 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated Resident #6 is on a physician prescribed weight gain regimen. Review of Resident #6's weights indicated; - 8/02/24: 120.6 Lbs (pounds) - 7/23/24: 119.6 Lbs - 7/01/24: 119.6 Lbs - 6/10/24: 120.2 Lbs Further review of the medical record failed to indicate any other weights were obtained in June, July and August 2024. Review of Resident #6's current physician order, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Wound Physician recommendations were followed for one Resident (#1) out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, for Resident #1 who had facility acquired pressure injuries, the facility failed to implement recommendations made by the Wound Physician on 10/6/23 and 10/11/23, and the Resident's wound worsened and Resident #1 was subsequently hospitalized on [DATE] with a wound infection. Findings include: The policy titled Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol, undated, indicated the following: - The physician will authorize pertinent orders related to wound treatments, including pressure reduction surfaces, wound cleansing and debridement approaches, dressings (occlusives, absorbtive, etc.) and application of topical agents. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 and current diagnoses nclude dementia and facility acquired pressure ulcer of the right heel. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal laws. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left on top of the medication cart unsupervised during medication pass. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage, dated 2017, indicated the following: - The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. - Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with authorized access. During a medication observation on 8/21/24 at 8:29 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse (#1) remove medications from the medication cart and place them on top of the medication cart. The surveyor then observed Nurse #1 leave six medications on top of the medication cart and walk down the hallway to obtain items from the kitchenette. The medications were left accessible and unattended in the hall and two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure accurate medical records were maintained for two Residents (#14 and #38) out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, for Resident #14 and #32, the facility failed to accurately document the level of supervision received during meals. Findings Included: 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in March 2020 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebral vascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #14's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/31/24, indicated Resident #14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status exam score of 15 out of a possible 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS further indicated Resident #14 currently requires supervision/touching assistance for eating. On 8/20/24 at 7:59 A.M., and 12:00 P.M., and 8/21/24 at 8:16 A.M., 12:19 P.M. and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control standards of practice for the prevention of infections were implemented. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. ensure nursing staff performed hand hygiene appropriately during the medication administration task; and 2. ensure infection control practices were maintained to prevent the spread of infection during medication administration. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Infection Control, dated as reviewed 10/14/22, indicated the following: - The facility require staff to wash their hands after each direct resident contact for which handwashing is indicated by accepted professional practice. - All personnel shall follow the handwashing /hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitor. Review of the facility document titled Protocol for Hand Hygiene, dated 8/17, indicated the following: - Examples of situation when hand hygiene is indicated: 1. Before and after direct patient/resident contact. 2. After…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $600K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA