Care Village at Mattapan
405 River Street, Mattapan, MA 02126 · For profit - Partnership · 85 certified beds · (508) 813-6898 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (21% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.1% | 16.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.4% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.4% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.8% | 15.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.4% | 19.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.9% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 4.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.6% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.2% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.9% | 77.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.2% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.8% | 11.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.67 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.79 | 1.50 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 74.0 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.85 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.90 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-05-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required 1) anticonvulsant medication for epilepsy (seizure disorder) and 2) an anticoagulant (blood thinner) for a newly diagnosed deep vein thrombosis (DVT, blood clot), the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from a significant medication error, when upon re-admission to the facility, his/her medication orders were not accurately reconciled by nursing resulting multiple missed doses of both medications. Resident #1 was observed experiencing seizure activity, was transported to the Hospital Emergency Department for evaluation and was admitted for treatment.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Medication Reconciliation and Management, undated, indicated medication reconciliation reduces adverse medication events and assists the resident to get the most effect from their medication.The Policy indicates to review and document all medications the resident is taking and compare the list to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program that included accurate and complete tracking and monitoring of antibiotic use. Specifically, the facility's antibiotic stewardship documentation was incomplete and did not accurately reflect residents with active antibiotic orders, and the facility was unable to demonstrate consistent monitoring, analysis, or reporting of antibiotic utilization in accordance with regulatory requirements.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, dated as revised January 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The commitment to oversee the use of antibiotics through a stewardship program is recognized as an integral to this facility's commitment to the highest quality of care and services. -The infection control preventionist will be considered the facility champion and antibiotic stewardship. -The monitoring of antibiotic use will be considered an integral and guiding the process changes tracking tools will include: *Monthly list of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents on two of two units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and common areas were maintained in good repair and sanitary condition and failed to consistently identify and correct environmental concerns through routine environmental rounds. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: Environmental surfaces will be cleaned and disinfected according to current CDC recommendations for disinfection of healthcare facilities and the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. 9. Housekeeping surfaces (e.g., floors, tabletops) will be cleaned on a regular basis, when spills occur. and when these surfaces are visibly soiled. 10. Environmental surfaces will be disinfected (or cleaned) on a regular basis (e.g., daily, three times per week) and when surfaces are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure concerns reported during the Resident Council related to call light responses were thoroughly documented and acted upon timely.Findings include:Review of the facility policy tilted Grievances/Concerns, revised 12/6/21, indicated the following: -Purpose: To provide residents/resident representatives a means of voicing their grievances/concerns freely without fear of retaliation and for facility administration to follow an established process for investigating grievances and complaints in an efficient, comprehensive, and timely manner. -Policy: Residents or their representatives may file a grievance or complaint concerning treatment, medical care, behaviors of other residents, staff members, theft of property, lost clothing, etc. Employees of the facility will assist residents and or their representatives in the grievance/complaint process when such requests are made. -Grievances/concerns may be submitted orally or in writing. The person/staff receiving an oral grievance/concern will fill out the Grievance/concern form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to alert the physician and the behavioral health provider of an increase in sexually inappropriate behaviors for one Resident (#8) out of a total of 18 sampled Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's Change in Resident's Condition or Status and Notification policy, dated 1/1/20 indicated: The RN (Registered Nurse) Supervisor/Charge Nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician, Physician extender or on-call physician when there has been a significant change in the residents medical/mental conditions and/or status but not limited to: d.) a change/deterioration in the residents physical/emotional/mental condition.Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, toxic encephalopathy and epilepsy. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #8 is severely cognitively impaired evidenced by a score of 6 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse to the State Agency for one Resident (#24) out of 18 sampled residents. Specifically, an allegation of verbal abuse was submitted to the facility on 2/11/26 but not reported to the State Agency until 2/18/26.Findings include:Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition policy last revised on 2/20/23, indicated:Report the incident immediately to the Director of Nursing and/or Administrator.The Administrator is responsible for ensuring that there has been notification [of] local law enforcement and the State Survey Agency within 2 hours of allegation after identification of alleged/suspected incident.Review of the facility's Grievance Log indicated that on 2/11/26 Family Member #1 reported that a staff member cursed at Resident #24 after he/she asked for help to clean the floor. The Grievance Log Action Taken entry indicated Supervisor cleaned wet floor and educated staff on what needs to happen when resident needs support. The Action Taken entry did not reference a response to the staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to investigate an allegation of verbal abuse for one Resident (#24), out of 18 sampled residents. Specifically, a Family Member reported an allegation of verbal abuse to the facility on 2/11/26, but an investigation did not begin until 2/18/26; approximately seven days later. Findings include:Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition policy last revised on 2/20/23, indicated:The shift Supervisor/Charge Nurse is identified as responsible for immediate initiation of the reporting process. The Administrator and Director of Nursing are responsible for investigation and reporting.The investigation will begin immediately after reporting the actual or suspected incident.Review of the facility's Grievance Log indicated that on 2/11/26 Family Member #1 reported that a staff member cursed at Resident #24 after he/she asked for help to clean the floor. The Grievance Log Action Taken entry indicated Supervisor cleaned wet floor and educated staff on what needs to happen when resident needs support. The Action Taken entry did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to secure medications for one of two medication storage areas. Specifically, the second floor medication cabinet was unlocked and medications were accessible to staff, residents and visitors.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy Storage of Medications (undated) indicated:Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturers' recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed personnel, pharmacy personnel or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications.Medication rooms, carts and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with authorized access.On 2/18/26 at 7:48 A.M. the surveyor observed the second floor medication cabinet unlocked, located at the nursing station. An open padlock hung from its clasp and there were no other means to lock the cabinet. The surveyor observed a refrigerator inside the cabinet, and it was unlocked. The surveyor opened the refrigerator door and observed:5 vials of various…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure two of two nourishment kitchens were maintained in a clean, sanitary condition and failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Nutrition Services, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: 4. To minimize the risk of foodborne illness, the time that potentially hazardous foods remain in the danger zone (41 Fahrenheit (F) to 135 F) will be kept to a minimum. Foods that are left without a source of heat (for hot foods) or refrigeration (for cold foods) longer than 2 hours will be discarded. Review of the facility policy titled Food Safety, dated August 2011 indicated but was not limited to the following:It is the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record, when nursing failed to document a urinary catheter change.Findings include:The Facility Policy, titled, Charting and Documentation, undated, indicated observations, medications administered, services performed, etc., would be documented in the residents' clinical records.Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in May 2023, diagnoses included Cauda Equina Syndrome (injury or herniated disk compresses nerve roots at the bottom of your spinal cord. The cauda equina nerves communicate with your legs and bladder. It causes back pain, weakness and incontinence) and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder.Review of Resident #1's August and September 2025 active Physician's Orders, indicated he/she had a physician's order, dated as effective since 05/19/23, which indicated nursing staff may change his/her indwelling urinary catheter as needed for blockage.Further review of Resident #1's August and September 2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for five Residents (#46, #43, #20, #42 and #11) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #46, the facility failed to follow a physician's recommendation to send the resident to an outside clinic. 2. For Resident #43, the facility failed to obtain a physician's orders for air mattress settings 3. For Resident #20, the facility failed to obtain a physician's orders to hold a tube feeding when the Resident was away from the facility. 4. For Resident #42, the facility failed to follow physician's orders regarding air mattress settings. 5. For Resident #11, the facility failed to implement physician's orders for heel booties and elevating heels off the mattress. Findings include: 1. Resident #46 was admitted in October 2024 with diagnoses including methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled in the main kitchen refrigerators, and that dented cans were not accepted into storage/circulation. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Food Receiving and Storage, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - When food is delivered to the facility it will be inspected for safe transport and quality before being accepted. - All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date). On 2/11/25 at 6:51 A.M., the surveyor observed a significantly dented can of carrots, a significantly dented can of beef stew, and three significantly dented cans of tropical fruit salad on the can rack in the kitchen storage room. On 2/11/25 at 6:51 A.M., the surveyor made the following observations in the main kitchen refrigerator: -One opened, undated and unlabeled ham roast. -One pan of cooked meat in juices, undated and unlabeled.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for four Residents (#46, #43, #3 and #20) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #46 the facility failed to maintain an accurate diagnosis list. 2. For Resident #43 the facility failed to document the appropriate location of a blood pressure measurement. 3. For Resident #3 the facility failed to ensure that the medical record included information pertaining only to that resident. 4. For Resident #20 the facility failed to accurately document the intake of enteral feeding per day. Findings include: 1. Resident #46 was admitted in October 2024 with diagnoses including methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. Review of the minimum data set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident #46 scored a 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. During observations throughout…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a dignified existence for one Resident (#3) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, staff failed to pull the privacy curtain or shut Resident #3's door when he/she was in bed without a top on, which exposed Resident #3 to others passing by in the hallway. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dignity/Quality of Life, dated 12/6/21, indicates the following: - Staff shall promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with care and treatment procedures. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in October 2010 with diagnoses including anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident #3 could not participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) due to severe cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS indicated Resident #3 requires assistance to dependence with activities of daily living. Review of Resident #3's current care plan indicates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition related to edema for one Resident (#19) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Change of Condition- Physician Notification, dated 1/10/17, indicated the following: - A change in condition is a significant clinical symptom(s) or development, which requires assessment and intervention - It is then the RN supervisor's responsibility to do a follow-up assessment and to ensure that the assessment is documented. - All assessment findings and relevant information should be compiled prior to calling the physician to ensure accuracy of information. - The physician (or alternate) will be contacted to report findings. Resident #19 was admitted in October 2019 with diagnoses including history of an embolism of the lower extremity and hemiplegia of the left side. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident #19 scored a 15 out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for one Resident (#3) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted in October 2010 with diagnoses including anemia. Review of the minimum data set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident #3 could not participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) due to severe cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS indicated Resident #3 requires assistance to dependence with activities of daily living. During an observation on 2/11/25 at 8:17 A.M., Resident #3 was lying in bed with approximately 6-7 dead cockroaches surrounding his/her bed. During an observation on 2/12/25 at 8:47 A.M., Resident #3 was lying in bed with a soiled brief on the floor next to him/her and approximately 6-7 dead cockroaches surrounding his/her bed. During an observation on 2/13/25 at 7:38 A.M., Resident #3 was lying in bed with a soiled brief on the floor next to him/her and approximately 6-7 dead…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to investigate a report of drug and alcohol use in the facility, reported by one Resident (#44), out of a total sample of 23 Residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, revised 2/20/23, indicated the following: Policy -Allegations of abuse will be reported and thoroughly investigated. -The Administrator and Director of Nursing are responsible for investigation and reporting. Investigation -The investigation will begin immediately after reporting the actual or suspected incident. -Initiate the investigative process using factual data. The investigation should be thorough with witness statements from staff, residents, visitors, and family members who may be interviewed and have information regarding the allegation. -The results of the investigation will be documented. -Conclusion must include whether the allegation was substantiated or not and what information supported the decision. -Corrective measures will be implemented and documented post incident. Follow-up Measure -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews for two Residents (#49 and #67) of 23 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure staff adequately identified a significant change in the Resident's status and completed a comprehensive Significant Change of Status Assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS) as required. Specifically 1. For Resident #49, the facility failed to identify and complete Significant Change in Status MDS when Resident #49, experienced significant weight loss, had an indwelling urinary catheter removed, and developed a stage 4 pressure wound. 2. For Resident #67, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status MDS when Resident #67 was signed on to hospice care. Findings include: Review of the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated October 2023, indicated a Significant Change in Status Assessment must be completed by the end of the 14th calendar day following determination that a significant change has occurred. It defines a significant change as a major decline or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately reflect the status of one Resident (#42) out of a total sample of 23 residents, when the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment failed to indicate that the Resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: Resident #42 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with diagnoses that include neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of Resident #42's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/16/25, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 indicating that the Resident is cognitively intact. The MDS failed to indicate the use of an indwelling catheter. On 2/11/25 at 8:00 A.M., Resident #42 was observed lying in bed, a urinary catheter drainage bag was observed hanging from the frame of his/her bed. Review of Resident #42's active Physician's orders indicated the following: -Foley Catheter Order: size: 16 french, 10 balloon Size, dated 5/19/23. -Empty Foley drainage bag and record 24 HOUR output, every night shift for Foley Output (TOTAL OUTPUT),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to create a baseline plan of care within the required 48 hours of admission for one Resident (#373) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: Resident #373 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses including acute embolism and deep vein thrombosis of the left upper extremity. Review of the medical record failed to indicate a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission. During an interview on 2/12/25 at 11:44 A.M., Unit Manager #1 said a baseline care plan should be completed within two days of admission, she further said that the care plan is necessary to guide the care givers on the resident's care needs.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive resident-centered care plan for one Resident (#371) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #371 the facility failed to develop a care plan for dialysis and for an actual skin impairment. Findings include: Resident #371 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease, renal dialysis dependence and osteomyelitis left ankle and foot. Review of Resident #371's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident scored a 12 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating he/she had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated the Resident was on dialysis, had a surgical wound and infections of the wound. Review of physician orders dated 1/30/25 indicated the following: -Resident to have dialysis on days Monday, Wednesday and Friday. -Dialysis catheter site left chest monitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), for one Resident (#28) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #28 the facility failed to provide assistance and/or supervision with meals. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activity of Daily Living, dated 12/22, indicated the following: -A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. -Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, the facility will provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that it is unavoidable. -The facility will ensure a resident is given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to address a change in condition related to edema management for one Resident (#19) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: Resident #19 was admitted in October 2019 with diagnoses including history of an embolism of the lower extremity and hemiplegia of the left side. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident #19 scored a 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS indicated Resident #19 requires substantial assistance to dependence with activities of daily living. During an observation on 2/11/25 at 8:14 A.M., Resident #19 was lying in bed with his/her left leg exposed. Resident #19's left leg was large and swollen throughout the leg. Resident #19 said that he/she has had increased leg swelling and pain in his/her left calf since last week. Resident #19 said he told his occupational therapist about it, but no one has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#58) out of a total sample of 23 residents received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain their vision. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #58 had a follow up and consultation for cataract surgery as recommended by the consulting eye doctor. Findings include: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses that include stiff man syndrome and anxiety. Review of Resident #58's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/10/25, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating that the Resident is cognitively intact. The MDS further indicated that the Resident's vision is impaired and he/she does not utilize corrective lenses. Review of the consultant eye doctor visit note, dated 7/11/24 indicated the following: -Assessment: 1. Cataract, mixed; Bothersome; L > R (left greater than right). -Plan: 1. Cataract surgery recommended; ophthalmology consult; Follow-Up: 3-4 Months; Referral: Ophthalmology…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice by not following a physician's order for air mattress settings to promote the healing of existing pressure ulcer for one Residents (#20), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, pressure ulcers stage 3 and 4 of back and sacrum. Review of Resident #20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident scored a 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating he/she was cognitively intact. The MDS further indicated the Resident had pressure ulcers. On 2/11/25 at 7:47 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #20 lying in his/her bed the air mattress was set at 100 lbs. (pounds). On 2/12/25 at 6:45 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #20 lying in his/her bed the air mattress was set at 100 lbs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to adhere to professional standards for the administration of enteral feeding (nutrition taken through a tube directly to the stomach or small intestine) for one Resident (#20) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement the enteral feeding in accordance with the physician's order to receive the enteral feeding for 24 hours per day. Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, dysphagia, gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident scored a 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating he/she was cognitively intact. The MDS further indicated the Resident utilizes a feeding tube. During an interview on 2/12/25 at 6:45 A.M., Resident #20 was observed lying in his/her bed, the Resident told the surveyor he/she had gone on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for two Residents (#3 and #11), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #3, the facility failed to label and date the oxygen tubing and maintain a clean oxygen filter. 2. For Resident #11, the facility failed to label and date nebulizer tubing and store it in properly in a bag. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration Policy and Procedure, dated 12/6/22, indicates the following: - Procedures: Check the physician order. If it is unclear, clarification must be obtained. - Precautions: Do not operate a concentrator without a filter or with a dirty filter. 1. Resident #3 was admitted in October 2010 with diagnoses including anemia. Review of the minimum data set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident #3 could not participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, policy reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental, and psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#28) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #28, the facility failed to ensure a psychiatric consult was completed. Findings Include: Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia without behaviors, dysphagia, and schizophrenia. Review of Resident #28's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she scored a six out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam indicating severe cognitive impairments. Further review of the MDS indicated the Resident is receiving an antipsychotic medication. Review of Resident #28's physician order, dated 7/24/24, indicated Psychological evaluation and treatment for: Adjustment to need for placement in facility and Med…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary medications and were properly assessed for possible adverse reactions to psychotropic medications for one Resident (#28) out of a total of 23 sampled residents. Specifically, for Resident #28, the facility failed to ensure an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS, a clinical outcome checklist completed by a healthcare provider to assess the presence and severity of adverse outcomes, such as abnormal movements of the face, limbs, and body in patients) assessment was completed. Findings Include: According to CMS guidelines, an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) test should be conducted on a nursing home resident when a resident starts or has significant changes to medications that can cause tardive dyskinesia, like certain antipsychotics. Review of facility policy titled [Outside Vendor] Behavioral Health, dated April 2023, indicated the purpose is to ensure all residents taking antipsychotic are monitored for adverse side effects. It is the policy of [Outside Vendor]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and standards increasing the risk of contamination and spread of infection for residents in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to unglove hands after bagging soiled linens and proceeded to wear the contaminated gloves in the hallway and potentially contaminate the soiled linen chute. Findings include: During an observation on 2/11/25 at 7:59 A.M., a certified nursing aide exited a Resident room with a bag of soiled linen wearing the same gloves that were used to bag the linen. The certified nursing aide walked through the hallway and disposed of the dirty linen in the linen chute. The certified nursing aide then removed the potentially contaminated gloves. During an observation on 2/12/25 at 8:45 A.M., a certified nursing aide exited a Resident room with a bag of soiled linen wearing the same gloves that were used to bag the linen. The certified nursing aide walked through the hallway and disposed of the dirty linen in the linen chute. The certified nursing aide then removed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure for four Residents (#3, #4, #15, and #13) that care plans were implemented, out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically: 1. For Residents #3, #4 and #15, the facility failed to provide supervision with meals, per the plan of care. 2. For Resident #13, the facility failed to ensure his/her call light was within reach, per the plan of care. Findings include: 1a. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in January 2002 with diagnoses including, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, and aphasia (difficulty communicating). Review of Resident #3's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident has severe cognitive deficits. The MDS also indicated Resident #3 requires maximum to dependent assistance with self-care activities, including eating. Review of Resident #3's care plan indicated: Focus: I need assistance with my ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) due to impaired mobility/decreased ROM (Range…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview for three Residents, (#37, #7, #30) out of a total of 24 sampled residents, the facility failed to implement interventions for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. Specifically: 1. For Resident #37, the facility failed to implement the Wound Physician's order for a wound dressing. 2. For Resident #30, who had actual skin breakdown, the facility failed to consistently implement the physician's orders for an air mattress, prevalon boots and heel offloading to prevent further skin breakdown/decline. 3. For Resident #7, the facility failed to implement the Wound Physician's order to offload heels. Findings include: 1. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility in June 2018 with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, dysphagia, and quadriplegia. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #37 is severely cognitively impaired and totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. On 3/8/24 at approximately 7:55…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal laws. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1.) ensure medication carts were locked and secured on one of two units, 2.) ensure medications were labeled and stored according with manufacture's guidelines, and 3.) ensure the medication cart keys were not left unattended. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Storage of Medications, undated, indicated medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. B. Only licensed nurses, pharmacy personnel, and those lawfully authorized to administer medications (such as medication aides) permitted to access medications. Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with authorized access E.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of practice to prevent possible infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Doff (remove) personal protection equipment properly and failed to perform hand hygiene. 2. Ensure nursing disinfected a glucometer (device that measure how much sugar is in a blood sample) according to manufactures guidelines. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy 'Transmission Based Precautions with PPE (personal protection equipment) Grid for COVID-19 Endemic' dated as last reviewed June 2/20/20, indicated: -Transmission based precautions are designed for patients documented or suspected of being infected or colonized with transmissible pathogens for which additional precautions beyond standard precautions are needed to interrupt transmission in the healthcare setting. Transmission based precautions may be used on an empiric or temporary basis. Use of precautions will be reassessed in these instances once laboratory and other clinical testing information is available. -Procedure:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure two of three Certified Nursing Assistant educational files reviewed had no less than 12 hours of in-service training per year. Findings include: Review of two of three Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) employee files indicated they failed to have 12 hours of in-service training. During an interview on 3/7/24 at 2:30 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said CNAs require 12 hours of in-service training annually. Nurse #7, who was present, said she believed the files provided had all the education that was available. During an interview on 3/7/24 at 4:32 P.M., the DON said she has additional education for the two CNAs. When asked why she could not produce the education at this time, the DON said the supervisor, who is out, has access to the education. At the time of exit on 3/8/24 at 3:00 P.M., no further education was provided to the surveyor for the two CNAs.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to 1. speak respectfully to one Resident (#14) and 2. staff failed to respect the resident environment as evidenced by using cell phones and conducting private conversations in a resident area, from a total sample of 24 residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Dignity/Quality of Life dated 12/6/21, indicated: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Procedure: - Residents shall always be treated with dignity and respect. - Staff shall always speak respectfully to residents, including addressing the resident by his or her name of choice and not labeling or referring to the residents by his or her room number, diagnosis, or care needs. 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Review of Resident #14's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to file a grievance for one Resident (#14) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Grievances/Concerns, dated as last revised December 2021, indicated the following: Policy: -Residents or their representatives may file a grievance or complaint concerning treatment, medical care, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, lost clothing, etc. Employees of the facility will assist residents and or their representatives in the grievance/complaint process when such requests are made. Procedure: -Grievances/concerns may be submitted orally or in writing. The person/staff receiving an oral grievance/concern will fill out the grievance/concern form for submission to leadership. Written complaints or grievances must be signed by the resident or the person filing the grievance/complaint on behalf of the resident. The resident/representative has the right to choose to remain anonymous. -Any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to implement their abuse prohibition policy for three Residents (#39, #25, and #10) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #39 and #25, the facility failed to ensure nursing immediately reported an allegation of potential abuse (resident to resident altercation) to the Director of Nursing or Administrator, as required. 2. For Resident #10, failed to ensure nursing immediately reported an allegation of potential abuse to the Director of Nursing or Administrator, as required. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prohibition, dated as revised 7/13/22, indicated allegations of abuse will be reported promptly and thoroughly investigated. Reporting: 1. All alleged violations can be observed by staff, residents, relative, visitor, another health care provider, or others. 2. Notify the Shift Supervisor / Charge Nurse/ Manager immediately in person if suspected abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of property occurs. 3. Report the incident immediately to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown source to the state agency within two hours, as required for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, on 7/14/23 at 1:50 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) was made aware of Resident #10's new pain and diagnosis of an angulated supracondylar fracture of the femur. The DON did not report this injury to the state agency until 7/19/23 at 3:43 P.M., almost 120 hours after becoming aware of the new fracture. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prohibition, dated as revised 7/13/22, indicated allegations of abuse will be reported promptly and thoroughly investigated. III. Injuries of Unknown Origin- An injury will be classified as an injury of unknown source when all of the following criteria are met: a. The source of the injury was not observed by any person AND b. The source of the injury could not be explained by the resident AND c. The injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury or the location of the injury (for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin and failed to maintain evidence of a thorough investigation was completed for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prohibition, dated as revised 7/13/22, indicated allegations of abuse will be reported promptly and thoroughly investigated. III. Injuries of Unknown Origin- An injury will be classified as an injury of unknown source when all of the following criteria are met: a. The source of the injury was not observed by any person AND b. The source of the injury could not be explained by the resident AND c. The injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury or the location of the injury (for example, an injury is located in an area that not generally vulnerable to trauma) or the number of injuries observed at one particular point in time or the incidence of injuries over time. Injuries of unknown origin will be considered potential abuse until otherwise proven through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that care plans were reviewed with the interdisciplinary team (IDT) as required for one Resident (#10), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to review and revise the Resident #10's care plans with the IDT after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Comprehensive Care Plan, undated, indicated an individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. 10. The Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team along with the resident/representative is responsible for the review and updating of care plans: b. When the desired outcome is not met. d. At least quarterly. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including dementia, cerebral infraction, and major depression. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for two Residents (#30 and #39), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #30, the facility failed to implement the physician's order for seizure pads. 2. For Resident #39, the facility failed to ensure staff had supporting testing to diagnosis paranoid schizophrenia and who was receiving antipsychotic medication. Findings include: 1. For Resident #30, the facility failed to implement the physician's order for seizure pads. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 and diagnoses included catatonic disorder, epilepsy, and cerebral infarction with hemiplegia and hemiparesis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/15/24, indicated Resident #30 required staff assistance with activities of daily living. Review of Resident #30's plan of care related to seizures, dated 7/9/22, indicated: - Please keep 2 1/2 padded side rails…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview for two Residents (#41 and #30), out of a total sample of 24 residents, the facility failed provide activities of daily living in accordance with their plan of care. Specifically: 1. For Resident #41, the facility failed to provide incontinence care and positioning in accordance with the plan of care. 2. For Resident #30, the facility failed to provide meals in accordance with physician's orders and the plan of care. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Activities of Daily Living, dated as revised December 2022 indicated the following: -Purpose: to provide support, assistance, and encouragement to remain as independent as possible with activities of daily living, including hygiene, mobility, elimination, dining, and communication; and that the care and services provided are person-centered and honor and support each resident's preferences, choices, values, and beliefs. -Policy: A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#39), out of a total sample of 24 residents received proper care and treatment to maintain good foot health. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care of the Fingernails/ Toenails, undated, indicated the purpose of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. 5. Stop and report to the nurse supervisor if there is evidence of ingrown toenails, infections, pain or if the nails are too hard or too thick to trim or file with ease. 7. Toenails will be trimmed/cut by the podiatrist. Add resident to the podiatry list as needed. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses including coagulation defect, unspecified fracture of the first lumbar vertebra, paranoid schizophrenia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/19/24, indicated Resident #39 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of a possible 15 which indicated moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, for one Resident (#25) out of a total sample of 24 residents, the facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate supervision to maintain safety. Specifically, for Resident #25, the staff knowingly allowed Resident #25 to keep his/her own smoking materials, including a lighter, and allowed Resident #25 to smoke unsupervised between designated supervised smoking times. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled Smoking, dated 5/26/2022, indicated the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to maintain a safe resident smoking/nicotine environment. This policy respects resident's rights and preferences and is in accordance with Life Safety Code requirements, and state and local laws governing safe practices for the facility. Smoking articles include but are not limited to cigarettes, cigars, vapor, e-cigarettes, and any nicotine related product. To provide a structured framework to ensure the safety and well-being of residents who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to identify and address a significant weight gain for one Resident (#39) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Specifically, for Resident #39 on 2/28/24, the Resident weighed 157.4 pound (lbs) and on 2/29/24, the Resident weighed 172.2 pounds which is a 9.40 % gain. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Weight Monitoring, dated as revised 12/21/22, indicated, the multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss/gain for our residents. 2. Weights will be recorded in the individual's medical record. 3. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken within 24 hours for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will notify the Dietitian, Physician and the resident/responsible party. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses including coagulation defect, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/19/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview for one Resident (#37) out of three applicable residents in a total sample of 24 residents, the facility failed to adhere to professional standards for the administration of enteral feeding (nutrition taken through a tube directly to the stomach or small intestine). Specifically, the facility failed to implement the physician's order for continuous feed, failed to notify the physician or nurse practitioner the continuous feed was not implemented and failed to obtain orders for an alternate way to support Resident #37's nutritional needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled 'Enteral Feedings, not dated, indicated: -Purpose: To ensure the safe administration of enteral nutrition. -Preparation: All personnel responsible for preparing, storing, and administering enteral nutrition formulas will be trained, qualified and competent in his or her responsibilities. -The facility will remain current in and follow accepted best practices in enteral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, for one Resident (#25), out of a total sample of 24 residents, the facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient staff to provide behavioral health care services as indicated in the facility assessment. Specifically, for Resident #25, with a known history of trauma and mental illness, the facility failed to provide services to include psychotherapy. Findings include: Review of the document titled Facility Assessment dated 12/11/23 indicated the facility accepts residents with psychiatric/mood disorders including the following common diagnoses: psychosis (hallucinations, delusions, etc.), impaired cognition, mental disorder, depression, bipolar disorder (i.e. mania/depression), post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, behavior that needs intervention, schizophrenia. Further review of the document indicated contracted behavioral health services, in-house services and telehealth as needed to psychiatric services and medication management as needed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to act upon recommendations made by the consultant pharmacist during the monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) for one Resident (#10), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the 11/29/23, 12/25/23, 1/25/24, and 2/26/24 consultant pharmacist's recommendations were acted upon. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Regimen Review, undated, indicated the consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive review of each resident's medication regimen and clinical record at least monthly. The medication regimen review (MRR) includes evaluating the resident's response to medication therapy to determine that the resident maintains the highest practicable level of functioning and preventing or minimizing adverse consequences related to medication therapy. All findings and recommendations are reported to the director of nursing and the attending physician, the medical director and the administrator. A. Prescriber accepts and acts upon suggestion or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that each Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for one Resident (#10), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, for Resident #10, the facility failed to ensure an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS, a clinical outcome checklist completed by a healthcare provider to assess the presence and severity of adverse outcomes, such as abnormal movements of the face, limbs, and body in patients) assessment was completed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, AIMS Testing, dated as revised 2023, indicated to ensure all residents taking anti-psychotics are monitor for adverse side effects. Anyone at the facility who is treated with an anti-psychotic medication is assessed with an AIMS every 6 months. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including dementia, cerebral infraction, and major depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/1/24, indicated Resident #10 received an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate for two Residents (#63, #30) out of a total of 24 sampled Residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #63, the facility failed to ensure his/her code status was accurate. 2. For Resident #30, the facility failed to ensure nursing maintained complete and accurate comprehensive weekly skin checks. Findings include: 1. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses including Lewy body dementia, cirrhosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #63's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #63 was severely cognitively impaired and did not elect a DNR/DNI (do not resuscitate/do not intubate) status. Review of Resident #63's admission check list dated [DATE] and signed by Resident #63's activated healthcare proxy indicated the facility did not obtain code status information upon admission. Review of the physicians' orders failed to indicate orders related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview for one Resident (#41), out of a total sample of 24 residents, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated person-centered care plan with individualized interventions was developed for the provision of hospice care services. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled: Hospice Program, dated as last revised 12/6/21, indicated the following: -Purpose: to ensure that residents are provided with Hospice Services when appropriate. -Policy: The facility contracts for hospice services for residents who wish to participate in such programs. 4. When a resident participates in the hospice program, a coordinated plan of care between the facility hospice agency and resident/family will be developed and shall include directives for managing pain and other uncomfortable symptoms. The care plan shall be revised and updated as necessary to reflect the resident's current status. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in February 2019 and has diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan related to the accuracy of resident code status. Specifically, the facility identified inconsistencies in the accurate documentation of advanced directives on [DATE] but failed to conduct a facility-wide Performance Improvement Project or to monitor for lapses. Subsequently, staff failed to provide Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) to one Resident (#63) who had an incomplete MOLST form and therefore, continued as a full code status. Findings include: Review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy, dated as reviewed [DATE] indicated: *QAPI encompasses all administrative, managerial, clinical and environmental services as well as performance of external providers and suppliers of care and services. QAPI is a comprehensive program by which the facility identifies problems or issues early on, develops a plan to address the root causes of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed as being at increased risk for elopement and exhibited exit seeking behaviors, the Facility failed to ensure they provided adequate safety equipment, specifically that facility emergency exit doors located at the far end of each unit, were equipped with alarms that sounded at levels loud enough for staff to be able to hear alarms from anywhere on the unit and therefore respond appropriately in an effort to maintain resident safety to prevent an incident of elopement. On [DATE], Resident #1 successfully eloped from the Facility through an emergency exit door unbeknownst to staff, and although the emergency exit door alarm sounded, staff did not hear or respond to the alarm because of it's low volume setting. Findings include: The Facility's Policy titled, Resident Elopement/Prevention, dated [DATE], indicated that the Facility will ensure that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and are at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-03-08 · tag F0582 — widespreadGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inform three out of three Residents, or their representative, of the potential liability for payment for non-covered services including estimated cost of services. Findings include: The Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) is a form which provides information to residents and/or their beneficiaries so that they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services they were receiving at the facility that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. Record review of three residents who had been taken off their Medicare Part A benefit indicated the facility failed to provide payment information regarding potential liability on the SNFABN form. During an interview on 3/7/24 at 12:25 P.M., the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse said she just started in December 2023 and was unable to provide evidence that the SNFABN forms were provided to the residents as required.
- No harm found · C2024-03-08 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure nursing staffing data, including the total number and actual hours worked by following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift, was posted daily in a prominent area and readily accessible to residents and visitors as required. Findings include: On 3/5/24 at 7:20 A.M., the surveyor was unable to locate the daily Nursing Staff data, required to be posted and accessible and available to residents and visitors. On 3/06/24 at 1:55 P.M., the surveyor was unable to locate the daily Nursing Staff data. During an interview on 3/6/24 at 2:00 P.M., the Administrator said the scheduler is responsible for putting up the daily Nursing Staff data, and that it was not posted today.
- No harm found · B2024-03-08 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview for two Residents (#28, #37) out of 24 sampled residents, the facility failed to complete a notice of intent to transfer/discharge to the hospital. Findings include: 1. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses including neurological disorder, coronary artery disease and diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #28 had moderately impaired cognition, and required assistance with most activities of daily living. Review of Resident #28's clinical record indicated he/she was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Additional review of the clinical record failed to indicate the facility provided Resident #24, or a responsible person, with a notice of intent to transfer/discharge to the hospital. During an interview with Nurse #3 (Resident #28's assigned nurse) on 3/7/24 at 1:51 P.M., he said if staff had given Resident #28, or his/her responsible person, a notice of intent to transfer/discharge for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-03-08 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview for two Residents (#37, #28) out of 24 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide bed hold notices upon transfer to the hospital. Findings include: 1. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility in June 2018 with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, dysphagia, and quadriplegia. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #37 is severely cognitively impaired and is totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Review of Resident #37's clinical record indicated he/she was transferred to the hospital on 2/19/24. Additional review of the clinical record failed to indicate the facility provided Resident #37's guardian with a bed hold notice, as required. During an interview on 3/8/24 at 11:22 A.M., the Administrator said that nursing staff is responsible for completing the bed hold notice and he was unable to locate the completed notice for Resident #37. 2. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in November…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOYLE, THOMAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | 33% | since 12/01/2018 |
| WYNNE, JOHN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 33% | since 12/01/2018 |
| ZISKIN, SCOTT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $347K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225532. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.