Medway Country Manor Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitat
115 Holliston Street, Medway, MA 02053 · For profit - Individual · 123 certified beds · (508) 259-7883 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $230,018 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-19)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-03, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2026-03 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 30.7% | 16.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.3% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.3% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.4% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.0% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.8% | 15.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.9% | 19.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.7% | 94.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.7% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.6% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.4% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.4% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.5% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.2% | 11.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.06 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.58 | 1.50 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.0%CMS range 32.0–48.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.7%CMS range 9.1–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 52.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 5.8–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 114.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
67 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews, for three of seven sampled residents (Resident #3, Resident #5, Resident #6), who required transmission based precautions to be utilized by nursing staff during the provision of care, the Facility failed to ensure, 1) that nursing staff were competent and had the necessary skill set to appropriately care for residents by donning the correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when a resident was on Contact Precautions (CP) or Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), when nursing staff members were observed not following precautions while caring for these residents and 2) that after a nursing staff member responsible for providing direct care to residents tested positive for Group A streptococcal Infection, (GAS, a bacterium that can cause many different infections, including strep throat and also cause severe, life-threatening invasive disease, and spread person to person through respiratory droplets or direct contact with an infected person's skin sores, nose, throat or wound secretions) that the staff member was removed from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2025-01-29 · tag F0773 — widespreadProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of seven sampled residents (Resident #1), who per Laboratory test results reported to the facility on 1/19/25 indicated he/she tested positive for Group A Streptococcal (GAS, a bacterium that can cause many different infections, including strep throat and also cause severe, life-threatening invasive disease, spread person to person through respiratory droplets or direct contact with an infected person's skin sores, nose, throat or wound secretions), the Facility failed to ensure Nursing promptly notified the physician of the results, who was not informed until four days later (1/22/25), as a result Contact Precautions were not initiated timely, therefore placing other residents and staff at risk for potentially contracting and spreading the infectious disease. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy, titled Lab and Diagnostic Test Results - Clinical Protocol, dated as revised November 2018, indicated the following: -the physician will identify and order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2025-01-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of three nursing units (West and Second) after a staff member Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 tested positive for Group A Streptococcal (GAS, a bacterium that can cause many different infections, including strep throat and also cause severe, life-threatening invasive disease, spread person to person through respiratory droplets or direct contact with an infected person's skin sores, nose, throat or wound secretions) on 1/18/25, facility administration failed to ensure it provided appropriate administrative oversight of Infection Control Practices when CNA #1 was not removed from the schedule until being on antibiotic therapy for 24 hours. Facility Administration was aware there were issues with GAS infections and transmission within the facility, however CNA #1 was scheduled and worked on two different resident care units between 1/19/25 and 1/20/25, placing the residents and staff at risk for contracting and/or spreading the infectious disease that could cause adverse harm up to and including death. Findings include: Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews for five of seven sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #5 and Resident #6), all of which required the need for staff to use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the provision of care due to an active infection, the Facility failed to ensure they implemented and maintained an infection control program that helped prevent the development and spread of infections, including Group A Streptococcal (GAS, a bacterium that can cause many different infections, including strep throat and also cause severe, life-threatening invasive disease, spread person to person through respiratory droplets or direct contact with an infected person's skin sores, nose, throat or wound secretions), that required treatment with antibiotics, when 1) 1/19/25 laboratory results for a resident who tested positive for GAS was not reported to the physician until 1/22/25, resulting in a delay in the implementation of appropriate precautions, 2) Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate pain management for one Resident (#7), out of a total sample of 24 residents, when the facility was unable to reach the Resident's primary care physician for a prescription to order Resident's Oxycodone (short-acting opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain), resulting in the Resident suffering with severe pain of 7 on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being the worst pain for 19 hours post-admission. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Pain Assessment and Management, last revised 10/2022, included but was not limited to:-The purposes of this procedure are to help the staff identify pain in the resident, and to develop interventions that are consistent with the resident's goals and needs and address the underlying causes of pain. Monitoring and Modifying Approaches:-Re-assess the resident's pain and consequences of pain at least every shift for acute pain or significant changes in levels of chronic pain-Monitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was admitted to the Facility with a wound to the small of his/her back (lower back sacral area) and a large reddened, discolored area in the medial (middle) area of his/her back, the Facility failed to ensure that the Physician was notified of Resident #1's wounds upon admission and that orders were obtained for treatment. As of result of not being treated, the wound to the small of Resident #1's back wound deteriorated to an unstageable pressure injury (full-thickness skin and tissue loss that is obscured by eschar - necrotic tissue) within one week of his/her admission, Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol, dated as revised April 2018, indicated that nursing staff will examine the skin of newly admitted residents for evidence of existing pressure injuries or other skin conditions and the physician will order pertinent wound treatments. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was admitted to the Facility with a wound to the small of his/her back (lower back sacral area) and a large reddened, discolored area in the medial (middle) area of his/her back, and was assessed by nursing as being at risk for skin breakdown, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received adequate care and services related to the promotion of healing or the prevention of worsening of his/her wounds, when treatment orders for his/her wounds were not obtained from the Physician until a week after his/her admission, at which point the wound to the small of Resident #1's back had deteriorated to an unstageable pressure injury (full-thickness skin and tissue loss that is obscured by eschar - necrotic tissue). Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Pressure Injury Risk Assessment, dated as revised March 2020, indicated the following: -conduct a structured pressure injury risk assessment as soon as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were fully aware of the grievance process. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure their grievance policy included the right to file grievances anonymously and failed to ensure residents were aware of and had access to formulate grievances anonymously, should they choose not to alert a staff member of their concern(s).Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances Policy and Procedures, revised 8/30/24, failed to indicate residents and/or their representatives had the right to file grievances anonymously.On 3/16/26 at 10:00 A.M., the surveyor held a resident group meeting with ten residents in attendance. All ten residents said that they were not aware of their right to file a grievance anonymously. They said if they have an issue, they must tell a staff member about it or write their name on the grievance form to include their room number, and hand the form into a staff member. The residents said there is nowhere to file them in a way to remain anonymous.On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment on two out of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For the [NAME] unit, the residents' environment was free of a pervasive pungent odor of feces and urine; and 2. For one room on the second floor, the footboard was in place. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Homelike Environment, undated, indicated residents are to be provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment and encouraged to use personal belongings to the extent possible. The policy stated staff and management are to maximize characteristics that reflect a personalized, homelike setting, including: -A clean, sanitary, and orderly environment -Clean bed and bath linens in good condition -Pleasant, neutral scents The policy also indicated staff and management are to minimize characteristics of an institutional setting, including institutional odors. 1. On 03/12/26 at 08:20 A.M., the surveyor smelled a pervasive and unbearable odor of feces and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for three Residents (#105, #106, #29), out of a total sample of 24 residents, that services were provided to maintain their vision or hearing abilities. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Residents #105 and #106, to ensure they were provided with audiology services after the Residents notified staff that their hearing aid devices were not working properly/broken, to support the Residents' hearing needs; and2. For Resident #29, to arrange for an optometry appointment to address the Resident's vision impairment. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Sensory Impairments-Clinical Protocol, dated March 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Treatment/Management: -For residents with impaired hearing, the staff should check for cerumen, and may (as indicated) help the individual obtain a hearing evaluation, hearing aid, or employ written or other means to communicate with the individual. -The physician will identify and order appropriate consultations to help manage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment, and help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a nebulizer machine (used to treat airway obstruction and bronchospasm by nebulizing aerosol medications) mouthpiece and reservoir (chamber that hold the liquid medication) were maintained in a sanitary manner for one Resident (#106), of 24 sampled residents. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Respiratory Treatment Administration Policy, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Respiratory treatments (including nebulizer treatments, oxygen therapy, and inhalation therapies) will be administered as ordered by the provider, following proper technique and infection control practices.-Equipment Care:-equipment must be changed weekly and as needed if soiled, contaminated, or malfunctioning-equipment must be stored in a clean,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete an assessment with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Level I (PASARR - a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) program for one Resident (#6), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to document the resident's diagnosis of Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Question 4A, history of substance use disorder (SUD) in Question 4B and Department of Mental Health (DMH) Involvement/case management in Question 5A resulting in an incorrect negative serious mental illness (SMI) screen.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled PASARR, established and revised 8/2025, indicated but was not limited to: The facility coordinates assessments with the PASARR program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with mental disorders (MD), intellectual disability (ID), or a related condition receive care and services in the most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered plan of care which included care and management for one Resident (#15) who had been determined by the staff to be at risk of elopement (an incident when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization or the necessary supervision to do so safely), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last revised 3/2022, included but was not limited to:-A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.-care plan interventions are chosen only after data gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes, and relevant clinical decision making.-assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nutritional status was maintained for two Residents (#83 and #3), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #83, to ensure a strict fluid restriction was provided and accurately documented.2. For Resident #3, to ensure a strict fluid restriction was provided and accurately documented. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Encouraging and Restricting Fluids, dated as revised October 2010, indicated but was not limited to:The purpose of this policy is to provide the resident with the amount of fluids necessary to maintain optimum health. This may include encouraging or restricting fluids.General Guidelines1. Follow specific instructions concerning fluid intake or restrictions.2. Be accurate when recording fluid intake3. Record fluid intake in mLs. (milliliters)1. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the medications were administered under direct supervision of a licensed nurse and not left at the bedside for one Resident (#126), out of a total sample of 24 residents.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, dated February 2021, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Self-administered medications are stored in a safe and secure place, which is not accessible by other residents. If safe storage is not possible in the resident's room, the medications of residents permitted to self-administer are stored on a central medication cart or in the medication room. A licensed nurse transfers the unopened medication to the resident when the resident requests them.-Any medications found at the bedside that are not authorized for self-administration are turned over to the nurse in charge for return to the family or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff to meet his/her care needs, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse Policy when on 01/18/25, after being notified of an allegation of verbal abuse by staff, the Activity's Director did not immediately report the allegation of verbal abuse to Administration, and did not do so until two days later. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Abuse Policy, untitled and undated, indicated the following: - verbal abuse includes, but is not limited to, threats of harm and/or making statements to frighten a resident, and - upon receiving an allegation of abuse, covered individuals will take necessary steps to protect all residents and then immediately notify the Administrator. Review of the Report submitted by the Facility via the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS), dated 01/23/25, indicated that on 1/18/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff to meet his/her care needs, the Facility failed to ensure that on 01/20/25, after Facility Administration was made aware of an allegation of verbal abuse of a resident (Resident #1)by a staff member (Certified Nurse Aide #1), that they reported the allegation to the Department of Public Health (DPH) within two hours as required, when it was not reported to DPH until 01/23/25, (three days later). Findings include: Review of the Facility's Abuse Policy, untitled and undated, indicated the following: -verbal abuse includes, but is not limited to, threats of harm and/or making statements to frighten a resident, and -the Facility must report an allegation of abuse to the Department of Public Health within two hours of becoming aware of the allegation. Review of the Report submitted by the Facility via the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS), dated as submitted on 01/23/25, indicated that on 1/18/25 at approximately 11:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and documentation review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were able to demonstrate the appropriate competencies and skill sets for 4 out of 5 licensed nurses and for 4 out of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff were able to identify and distribute modified diet textures to residents, as ordered; and 2. Licensed nurses (Nurse #4, #6, #9, and Unit Manager #1) and CNAs (#1, #3, #5 and #6) had demonstrated competency in skills necessary to care for residents. Findings include: Competency is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 8/1/24, indicated the facility's training program included an orientation process and ongoing training for all new and existing staff including managers, nursing, and other direct care staff. The facility completes an educational needs assessment and develops a curriculum and training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-25 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee record review and interview, the facility failed to complete performance reviews of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for 3 out of 3 CNA employee records reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled In-Service Training, Nurse Aide, dated as last revised in August 2022, indicated the following: -all personnel are required to participate in regular in-service education -the facility completes a performance review of nurse aides at least every 12 months -in-service training is based on the outcome of the annual performance reviews On 11/22/24 at 12:35 P.M., the surveyor requested employee files for CNAs #1, #5, and #6. On 11/22/24 at 2:18 P.M., the surveyor was provided education files for two of the three CNAs. During an interview on 11/22/24 at 2:37 P.M., the Human Resources Coordinator said there was no file for CNA #6 who was hired in November 2021, and she was unable to locate any information regarding the staff member's education…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-25 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) completed the required 12 hours (no less than) of annual training, which at a minimum must include dementia and abuse training for 3 out of 3 CNA education files reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled In-Service Training, Nurse Aide, dated as last revised in August 2022, indicated the following: -all personnel are required to participate in regular in-service education -the facility completes a performance review of nurse aides at least every 12 months -in-service training is based on the outcome of the annual performance reviews -ensures the continuing competency of nurse aides, are no less than 12 hours per employment year, address areas of weakness -nurse aide participation in training is documented by the staff development coordinator or his/her designee and includes: date and time of training, topic of training, method used for training, summary of the competency assessment and hours of training completed On 11/22/24 at 12:35 P.M., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-25 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure three Residents (#78, #66, and #43), in a sample of 22 residents, had been seen by a physician every every 60 days and that required visits alternated between the Physician and the Nurse Practitioner (NP). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure for: 1. Resident #78, required visits alternating between the Physician and the NP occurred every 60 days; and 2. Resident #66, required visits alternated between the Physician and the NP occurred every 30 days for the first 90 days then every 60 days; and 3. Resident #43, required visits alternated between the Physician and the NP occurred every 30 days for the first 90 days then every 60 days. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Services, dated as revised February 2021, indicated but was not limited to: -Physician visits, frequency of visits, emergency care of residents, etc., are provided in accordance with current OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) regulations and facility policy. 1. Resident #78 was admitted to the facility in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-25 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interviews, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to provide sufficient support personnel with appropriate competencies and skills to safely and effectively carry out the functions of food and nutrition services. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure support staff with appropriate competencies and skills were available to provide meals that meet the residents' needs; and, 2. Provide documentation that dietary competencies were conducted on all dietary personnel. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 8/7/24, included but was not limited to: -This facility assessment will be used to inform staffing decisions to ensure that there are a sufficient number of staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary to care for its residents' needs as identified through resident assessment and plans of care; -Information about our residents: Skilled acuity (Time Period: Quarter 2 April 1 - June 30), Mechanically Altered Diet or Swallowing Disorder-15.3 residents; -Policies and Procedures: Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate modified texture diet was prepared and served for one test tray. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served in a form designed to meet the individual needs of five Residents (#98, #353, #67, #39, and #19), out of a total of 22 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. To prepare and serve a test tray with a ground-textured diet; 2. For Residents #98 and #353, to prepare and serve a ground diet per the physician's order; and 3. For Residents #67, #39, and #19, to prepare and serve a chopped diet per the physician's orders. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Therapeutic Diets, revised October 2017, included but was not limited to: Policy Statement: Therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care and in accordance with his or her goals and preferences. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -Diet will be determined in accordance with the resident's informed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the main kitchen was maintained in a sanitary and safe condition. Findings include: 1. Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised January 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 3-305.11 (A) Except as specified in paragraphs (B) and (C) of this section, food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food (1) in a clean, dry location. 4-602.11 (D) Equipment is used for storage of packaged or unpackaged food such as a reach-in refrigerator and the equipment is cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. 4-602.13 Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. 6-501.12 (A) Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that pneumonia vaccines were administered to 12 Residents (#29, #53, #8, #54, #24, #85, #91, #17, #79, #19, #353, #63) with signed consents (by the resident or Health Care Proxy) to receive the vaccine, of a total sample of 20 residents reviewed for immunizations. Specifically, a random sample of 20 residents who consented to receive the pneumonia vaccine was reviewed. Of the 20 residents who gave consent to receive the pneumonia vaccine, 12 residents had not been given the pneumonia vaccine as of 11/25/24. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised on 8/28/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: 1. Recommended Vaccines -Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13, Prevnar 13): Recommended for all adults 65 years and older, including nursing home residents. It protects against 13 types of pneumococcal bacteria. -Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine (PPSV23, Pneumovax 23): Recommended for all adults 65 years and older, typically administered at least one year…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, person-centered care plan to meet the physical, psychosocial, and functional needs for one Resident (#15), out of 22 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented to address Resident #15's pain. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, indicated but was not limited to: -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan includes measurable objectives and timeframes. -Reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including spinal stenosis (a condition where the spaces in the spine narrow, putting pressure on the spinal cord and nerves.), pain, and abnormal posture. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/9/24, indicated Resident #15 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed for one Resident (#42) of 22 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, for Resident #42, the facility failed to accurately transcribe his/her orders for levofloxacin (antibiotic) resulting in 14 additional doses. Findings include: Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019 indicated the following: -The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated the following: -Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were conducted for one Resident (#353), in a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, for Resident #353, the facility failed to perform treatments to two wounds on the right foot, per physician's orders. Findings include: Resident #353 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with a diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease with arterial wounds (ulceration that occurs when non-pressure related disruption or blockage of the arterial blood flow to an area causes tissue necrosis). Review of the care plans indicated Resident #353 had wounds to the right foot and treatments would be provided as ordered. Review of the wound physician consultant progress note, dated 11/6/24, indicated Resident #353 had a wound to the right dorsal (back or upper side) foot and a wound to the right lateral (side) foot. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #353 went out to the hospital and returned following a left above the knee amputation. Review of the admission Nursing Assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed for one Resident (#66) of 22 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to the Resident consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the Resident's goals and preferences. Specifically, the facility failed to implement recommendations made by the consulting physiatrist (medical doctor who specializes in physical medicine and rehabilitation who diagnose the cause of the pain and aid in developing a comprehensive treatment plan). Findings include: Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses which included chronic low back pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/12/24, indicated Resident #66 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 15 and had received both scheduled and as needed pain medication. Further review of the MDS indicated his/her pain occasionally affected sleep and occasionally interfered with therapy and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed for one Resident (#48), out of a total sample of 22 residents, to ensure professional standards of care and treatment for hemodialysis (a treatment where a machine removes blood from your body, filters it through a dialyzer (artificial kidney) and returns the cleaned blood to your body). Specifically, the facility failed to have a person-centered care plan with individualized interventions, failed to monitor and care for the access site, and failed to ensure communication including labs, changes in condition, medications, and advanced directives between the facility and dialysis treatment center was ongoing and collaborative. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Policy and Procedure for Post-Dialysis Patients, updated 9/5/24, indicated but was not limited to: -Following dialysis nursing home staff should routinely monitor the resident's vital signs, including blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, and respiratory rate, to detect any signs of complications as ordered by the physician. -For…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and eliminate triggers for a Resident (#99) with a history of trauma, to avoid potential re-traumatization, out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Policy and Procedure Trauma Informed Care, dated 9/28/24, indicated the following: -Trauma History Screening: During the admission process, staff should assess each resident for potential history of trauma through sensitive and respectful questioning. -Individualized Care Plans: Care plans should integrate trauma histories (when known) to personalize care approaches that are mindful of past trauma. This includes considerations for triggers, preferred routines, and coping strategies. -Family involvement: Family members or significant others should be included in care planning and decision-making processes when appropriate, provided the resident consents. Resident #99 was admitted to the facility in October 2024. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/9/24, indicated the resident was moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the monthly medication regimen review (MRR) reports for two Residents (#51 and #68), out of a total sample of 22 residents, were included in the medical record or readily available for review to indicate the Physician's response to the recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist. Findings include: 1. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses including depression, heart failure, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 indicated the Consultant Pharmacist had completed a MRR and indicated but was not limited to the following: -9/13/23: Medications reviewed. Please see the Consultant Pharmacist report for the recommendations. -8/29/24: Medications reviewed. Please see the Consultant Pharmacist report for the recommendations. -10/30/24: Medications reviewed. Please see the Consultant Pharmacist report for the recommendations. The Resident's medical record failed to include the Consultant Pharmacist reports indicating the recommendations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed for one Resident (#42) of 22 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs and was not used for an excessive duration. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #42's levofloxacin (antibiotic) was administered for only three doses as ordered by the physician, resulting in an additional 14 administrations. Findings include: Resident #42 was admitted to the facility in July 2018 with the following diagnoses: diabetes mellitus and end stage renal disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/5/24, indicted Resident #42 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 and had received antibiotics. Review of Resident #42's Care Plan, initiated on 11/4/24, indicated he/she had pneumonia and should receive antibiotic therapy as ordered by the physician. Review of Resident #42's Physician's Orders indicated but was not limited to: -levofloxacin, alternating dose give 500 milligrams (mg)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident's (#51) drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an as needed antipsychotic medication was limited to 14 days or extended beyond 14 days with a documented clinical rationale and duration. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, dated July 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: 15. PRN (as needed) orders for antipsychotic medications will not be renewed beyond 14 days unless the healthcare practitioner has evaluated the resident for the appropriateness of that medication. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses including depression and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #51, dated 8/28/24, indicated that Resident #51 was moderately cognitively impaired, as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15. The MDS also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than five percent when one of two nurses made three errors out of 27 opportunities, totaling a medication error rate of 11.11%. These errors impacted two Residents (#97, #256), out of five residents observed. Specifically, 1. For Resident #97, Nurse #3 omitted medications and did not notify the provider; and 2. For Resident #256, Nurse #3 administered a normal saline flush to his/her intravenous device (a catheter inserted into a blood vessel) without an order. Findings include: Review of Lippincott Nursing Procedures, Ninth Edition, Safe Medication Administration Practices, General, indicated that nurses must adhere to the five rights of medication administration: identify the right patient by using at least two patient-specific identifiers; select the right medication; administer the right dose; administer the medication at the right time; and administer the medication by the right route. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with accepted professional principles of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the key; and 2. Provide separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs listed in Schedule II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1976 and other drugs subject to abuse, except when the facility uses single unit package drug distribution systems in which the quantity stored is minimal and a missing dose can be readily detected. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, dated as revised December 2019, indicated but was not limited to: -The facility should check the refrigerator or freezer in which vaccinations are stored, at least two times a day, per CDC Guidelines, -Controlled-substances that require…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0924 — isolatedPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the handrail in the corridor of the [NAME] Unit was secured to the wall for one of three resident units. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Maintenance Service, revised December 2009, indicated but was not limited to: -The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner always. -Functions of the maintenance personnel include maintaining the building in good repair and free from hazards; -Providing routinely scheduled maintenance service to all areas. Review of the [NAME] Unit Maintenance log indicated that between the dates 10/16/24 and 10/25/24 an entry was written stating the hallway handrail outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was broken with no indication of completion or acknowledgement. The entries after and before this were crossed out. During an initial tour on 11/19/24 at 8:40 A.M., the surveyor observed the handrail in the corridor on the [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was diagnosed with dementia, had an activated Health Care Proxy, and had physicians orders for the administration of psychotropic medications, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Health Care Agent and/or alternates were provided with necessary information including the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications and failed to ensure they obtained written informed consent for their use, prior to administration of an antidepressant and antipsychotic medication. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Consent to Treat, undated, indicated the following: -prior to administering any medical treatment or intervention, written or verbal consent must be obtained from the resident or their legal representative; -healthcare providers must assess the resident's capacity to provide informed consent. If a resident is deemed incapable of making decisions regarding their medical care, consent should be obtained from their legal representative as per legal guidelines; -all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), after facility staff were made aware on 05/06/24 by a Family Member of an allegation that he/she was sexually abused by a staff member, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their abuse policy when 1) Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 and CNA #2 (who fit the description of the accused staff member) were not immediately suspended pending an investigation, and 2) failed to conduct Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) check and Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) checks prior to CNA #1 and CNA #2's date of employment at the Facility, in accordance with their Abuse Policy. Both of these issues placed their resident's at risk for potential abuse. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, dated as revised 01/21/20, indicated the Facility assured an environment free of abuse, neglect, mistreatment and would do the following: -upon receiving an allegation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure that after an administrative staff member (Director of Nurses) was made aware on 05/06/24 of an allegation of sexual abuse, that it was reported to the Department of Public Health (DPH) within two hours as required, when it was not reported to the DPH until 05/07/24, the following day. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, dated as revised 01/21/20, indicated the Facility assured an environment free of abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of resident property. The Policy indicated that a thorough investigation will be completed under the direction of the Director of Nurses (DON) and Administrator and that the Administrator will provide proper notification to the state agency. The Policy further indicated that a report is to be made within two hours to the Department of Public Health immediately for suspected abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in May…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was a long-term care resident without any discharge plans, the Facility failed to permit Resident #1 to return following a hospitalization on 11/09/23, and despite an Appeal Decision on 12/01/23 in favor of Resident #1 which ordered the Facility to rescind the Notice of Intention Not to Readmit Following Hospitalization, the Facility refused to permit Resident #1's return and Resident #1 remained hospitalized for more that 60 days while the hospital sought alternate placement. Findings include: The Facility Policy, dated as revised March 2022, titled Bed-Holds and Returns, indicated residents and/or representatives are informed of the Facility and State bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence and indicated residents will be permitted to return to an available bed in the location of the Facility that he/she previously resided. The Facility Policy, dated as Revised March 2021, titled Transfer or Discharge Notice, indicated residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for three of three sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate medical records related to assessments, care plans and staff identifiers within their electronic medical records system. Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Charting and Documentation, dated as revised July 2017, indicated the following: -all services provided to the resident shall be documented in the residents medical record; -treatments performed are to be documented in the resident's medical record; -documentation of procedures and treatments will include care-specific details including, the date and time the procedure/treatment was provided, the name and title of the individual who provided the care, and the signature and title of the individual documenting. A) Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in May 2023, diagnoses included: intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, osteoporosis, sciatica,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who upon admission was assessed to be at risk for skin breakdown, and was noted to have actual wounds to the small (sacral area) and medial (middle) area of his/her back, the Facility failed to ensure they developed and implemented a comprehensive plan of care that included measurable objectives, goals, and interventions related to his/her wound care needs. Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, dated as revised March 2022, indicated the following: -a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -the care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; -the comprehensive, person-centered care plan must include measurable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that concerns addressed by the Resident Council Group had sufficient follow-up to address and prevent recurrence. Specifically, the facility failed to initiate a late medication administration grievance after the residents brought up the concern in the June 2023 and July 2023 Resident Council meetings. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled 'Grievances/Concerns Program' with a revision date of 6/17 indicated the following: *All employees, residents and family members have a right to voice grievances and recommendations for changes, grievances will be documented and responded to in an orderly and timely manner. *The responsible department head will follow up with the employee, resident and/or family member to provide feedback on their concerns and to identify action that has been taken. This contact will occur ideally within 72 hours of the concern/grievance. Review of the 6/23/23 and 7/21/23 Resident Council Minutes indicated that the residents in attendance reported a concern for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow the plan of care for treatment and prevention of a pressure ulcer for three Residents (#75, #88, and #64), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #75, who has multiple stage 4 pressure ulcers (full thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone) and a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI- pressure related injury to subcutaneous tissue under intact skin), to ensure the air mattress was at the correct setting; 2. For Resident #88, to obtain a physician's order for an air mattress, including appropriate settings, monitoring and checking for function and placement; and 3. For Resident #64, who had two pressure ulcers, to ensure nursing obtained physician's orders for the use of an air mattress. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Support Surface Guidelines, dated September 2013, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when 3 out of 4 nurses observed made 4 errors out of 28 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 14.29%. Those errors impacted 3 Residents (#28, #46, and #19), out of 4 residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, dated as revised April 2019, indicated medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including the required timeframe. 5. Medication administration times are determined by the resident need and benefit, not staff convenience. Factors that are considered include: a. enhancing optimal therapeutic effect of the medication 7. Medications are administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders) 10. The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE times to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation in the medical record for three Residents (#84, #18, and #64), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #84, the nurses documented in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that safety mats were in place, when they were not; 2. For Resident #18, the facility failed to ensure nursing maintained an accurate order for two physician's orders of sennosides (medication used to treat constipation) which did not contain a dosage as required; and 3. For Resident #64, the physician's ordered Ferrous Sulfate (medication used for anemia) did not contain a dosage as required. Findings include: 1. Resident #84 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 and had diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/13/23, indicated that on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam Resident #84 scored a 7 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. Review of the current Physician's Orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide education, assess for eligibility, and offer pneumococcal vaccines (help prevent pneumococcal disease) for two Residents (#88 and #17), out of a total sample of five residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised March 2022, indicated the following: -Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the Pneumococcal Vaccine series, and when indicated, are offered the vaccine series within (30) days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated. -Assessments of Pneumococcal Vaccination status is conducted within five (5) working days of the resident's admission if not conducted prior to admission. -Before receiving a Pneumococcal Vaccine, the resident or legal representative receives information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the Pneumococcal Vaccine. (See current vaccine information statements at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to identify and assess the use of locking a wheelchair and placing mobile residents at the table as a potential restraint for one Resident (#58), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Findings include: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility in July 2020 with diagnoses including vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances and anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/11/23, indicated that Resident #58 scored a 6 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated that Resident #58 is dependent on staff for daily care. On 8/7/23 at 8:25 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #58 in his/her wheelchair in the unit dining room. The surveyor observed Resident #58's wheelchair pushed against the table. Resident #58 was making repeated attempts to wheel away from the table but was unable to do so because the wheelchair brake was locked. Resident #58 could be heard repeatedly saying, I'm stuck,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's abuse policy for one Resident (#60), of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Unit Manager #1 reported an allegation of potential abuse to the Administrator as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation -Reporting and Investigating, revised April 2021, indicated the following: -If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. - Immediately is defined as: a. within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or result in serious bodily injury. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/22/23, indicated that Resident #60 scored 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify and complete a Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) assessment for one Resident (#18), who elected to receive hospice care services, out of a total sample of 28 residents. Findings include: Review of the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated October 2019, indicated a SCSA comprehensive assessment must be completed by the end of the 14th calendar day following determination that a significant change has occurred. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in November 2022 with diagnoses including edema, restlessness and agitation, and cognitive decline. Review of the most recent MDS assessment indicated that staff completed the assessment on 5/30/23. Review of the Physician's Order, dated 7/14/23, indicated: -7/14/23 Screen and admit to Hospice if appropriate. Review of the Election of Hospice Benefit and Informed Consent form, dated 7/14/23, indicated Resident #18 elected hospice services effective 7/15/23. Review of the nursing note, dated 7/16/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective person-centered baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission to the facility for one Resident (#342), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan including interventions pertaining to falls for a Resident assessed to be at a high risk for falling; the Resident subsequently fell. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans - Baseline, dated as revised March 2022, indicated the following: -A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. -The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality of care for the resident. -The baseline care plan is updated as needed to meet the resident's needs until the comprehensive care plan is developed. Review of the facility's policy titled Falls -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for two Residents (#36 and #14), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #36, to develop and implement a Suicidal Ideation (SI) care plan following a hospitalization for SI; and 2. For Resident #14, a dialysis patient, to develop and implement an individualized dialysis care plan. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Suicide Threats, undated, indicated the following: *Resident suicide threats shall be taken seriously and addressed appropriately. *If the resident remains in the facility, staff will monitor the resident's mood and behavior and update the care plan accordingly. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/7/23, indicated that on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam Resident #36 scored 10 out of 15,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the care plan for one Resident (#84) was reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team to include new interventions ordered by the physician, out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to revise the care plan to include a physician's order for safety fall mats. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, indicated the following: -Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition change. -The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: a. when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; b. when the desired outcome is not met; c. when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and d. at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS assessment. Resident #84 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 and had diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for two Residents (#84 and #14), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #84, the nurses documented on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that safety mats were in place beside the bed, as ordered by the physician, when they were not; and 2. For Resident #14, the facility failed to check the Resident's vitals and blood pressure before administering Metoprolol (a medication used to treat high blood pressure). Findings include: 1. Resident #84 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 and had diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/13/23, indicated that on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam Resident #84 scored 7 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. On 8/07/23 at 7:59 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #84 in bed with pillows positioned snugly around his/her body. There were no safety mats in place. Review of the current Physician's Orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, policy review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered hearing aids were provided to two Residents (#88 and #18), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Hearing Aid Care, dated 2/2018, indicated: -Staff will assist hearing impaired residents to maintain effective communications with clinicians, care givers, other residents and visitors. -Staff will assist residents with the care and maintenance of hearing devices. 1. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/7/23, indicated that on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam Resident #88 scored 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS further indicated Resident #88 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of Resident #88's Nursing Assessment, dated 7/2/23, indicated Resident #88's hearing was highly impaired, and he/she used hearing aids in both ears.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of an indwelling catheter (a flexible tube that inserted through the urethra and into the bladder to drain urine) consistent with professional standards of practice, for two Residents (#88 and #64), out of 28 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #88, to assess for and obtain physician's orders for the use of and care/management of an indwelling urinary catheter, and the potential of removal of the catheter; and 2. For Resident #64, to follow the physician's order for the maintenance of a urinary drainage bag. Findings include: 1. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with the following diagnoses: multiple sclerosis and recurrent enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/7/23, indicated Resident #88 was cognitively intact based on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to properly manage the enteral tube feeding for one Resident (#11), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump, dated as revised November 2018, indicated the following: -Ensure that the equipment and devices are working properly by performing any calibrations or checks as instructed by the manufacturer or this facility. -3. Check the enteral nutrition label against the order before administration. Check the following information: a. Resident name, ID and room number; b. Type of formula; c. Date and time formula was prepared; d. Route of delivery; e. Access site; f. Method (pump, gravity, syringe; and g. Rate of administration (mL/hour). -5. Refer to facility procedures for hang times and administration set changes. Review of the current ASPEN Safe Practices for Enteral Nutrition Therapies guidelines indicated the following: -While literature states…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#343), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #343, the facility failed to obtain measurements and obtain physician's orders for dressing changes and flushes, as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Central Venous Catheter Care and Dressing Changes, dated as revised March 2022, indicated the purpose of the procedure is to prevent complications associated with intravenous therapy, including catheter related infections that are associated with contaminated, loosened, soiled or wet dressings. -General Guidelines 1. Perform site care and dressing changed at established intervals. 3. Change the dressing if it becomes damp, loosened or visibly soiled and: a. at least every 7 days for a transparent dressing b. at least every 2 days for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing provided respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#87 and #24), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #87, who required tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, to ensure nursing obtained physician's orders for tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning; and 2. For Resident #24, to ensure nursing changed oxygen tubing, and provided the correct concentration of Oxygen as ordered. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Tracheostomy Care, dated as revised August 2013, indicated the purpose of the procedure is to guide tracheostomy care and the cleaning of reusable tracheostomy cannulas. -General Guidelines 4. Tracheostomy cannula should be changed as ordered and as needed 5. Tracheostomy care should be provided as often as needed, at least once daily for old established tracheostomies, and at least every eight hours for residents with unhealed tracheostomies. 6. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for one Resident (#14), of five receiving dialysis services, out of a sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to document weights and vitals in a dialysis communication book pre-dialysis and failed to receive communication from the dialysis center with weights and vitals post-dialysis. Findings include: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/29/23, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 14 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. Review of Resident #14's Dialysis Communication Book, that he/she takes to dialysis three times a week, did not indicate any pre-dialysis weights and post-dialysis weights. During an interview on 8/9/23 at 9:43 A.M., Nurse #11 said weights and vitals pre- and post-dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement a trauma informed care plan for one Resident (#36), out of a sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) care plan for Resident #36 who has an active diagnosis of PTSD. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled 'Trauma Informed Care', with no revision date, indicated the following: *Trauma informed care is culturally sensitive, and person centered. *All staff are guided in evidence based organizational and interpersonal strategies that support trauma informed care. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of Resident #36's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/7/23, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 indicating moderate impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated a diagnosis of PTSD. Review of the Resident's Hospital Discharge Record, dated 5/28/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure two Nurses (#2 and #3) were competent and had the required skill set to prepare and administer the correct dose of Diclofenac Sodium External Gel (topical pain medication) impacting two Residents (#28 and #46). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, dated as revised April 2019, indicated medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including the required timeframe. 10. The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE times to verify the right medication, right dosage, right time and right route before administering the medication. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, dated as revised April 2019, indicated medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. 23. As required or indicated for a medication, the individual administering the medication records in the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days unless the prescribing practitioner documents a rational to extend the medication for one Resident (#18), in a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #18 the facility failed to ensure as needed Klonopin (psychotropic medication) had a stop date as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, dated December 2016, indicated: 14. The need to continue as needed (PRN) doses for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires the practitioner document the rational for the extended order. The duration of the PRN order will be indicated in the order. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in November 2022 with diagnoses including edema, restlessness and agitation, and cognitive decline. Review of the Physician's Order, dated 7/20/23, indicated: -7/20/23 Klonopin Oral Tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg) (Clonazepam) *Controlled Drug*, give 1 tablet by mouth every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to: 1. Properly lock medication carts and a medication storage room, and 2. Ensure medications were securely stored at the bedside for one Resident (#19), out of total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, Resident #19's Solanpas (medicated pain patches) patches were on the bedside table, unattended. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, dated as revised November 2020, indicated the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. 1. Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light and humidity controls. Only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications have access to locked medications. 6. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals are locked when not in use. Unlocked medication carts are not left unattended. 1. On 8/07/23 at 7:02 A.M., the surveyors entered the East 1 unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to a) store food, and b) handle food, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: The facility was unable to provide a facility policy regarding safe food labeling and dating practices. Review of the facility's food storage reference guide titled Cold Food Storage Chart, revised September 2021, indicated the following: *Egg salad and tuna salad should be stored refrigerated for a maximum of 4 days. *Cooked meat or poultry should be stored refrigerated for a maximum of 4 days. *Raw egg whites should be stored refrigerated for a maximum of 4 days. *Hard cooked eggs should be stored refrigerated for a maximum of 1 week. Review of the 2013 Food Code (a model for safeguarding public health and ensuring food is unadulterated and honestly presented when offered to the consumer) indicated A food employee may drink from a closed BEVERAGE container if the container is handled to prevent contamination of: (1) The EMPLOYEE'S hands; (2) The container; and (3) Exposed food a) On 8/7/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility developed a hospice plan of care as required for one Resident (#18), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Hospice Program, dated as revised July 2017, indicated hospice services are available to residents at the end of life. 13. Coordinated care plan for residents receiving hospice services will include the most recent hospice plan of care as well as the care and services provided by our facility (including the responsible provider and discipline assigned to specific tasks). Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in November 2022 with diagnoses including edema, restlessness and agitation, and cognitive decline. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/30/23, indicated Resident #18's hearing was adequate with a hearing aid and he/she could usually make self understood and he/she can usually understand others. Review of the Physician's order, dated 7/14/23, indicated: -Screen and admit to Hospice if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$230,018 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $89,440 — penalty dated 2026-03-19
- $134,285 — penalty dated 2025-01-29
- $6,293 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEFKOWITZ, SHIMON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 65% | since 06/01/2014 |
| SIMHA, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2014 |
| MAVADO MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2014 |
| BBUYE, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/25/2025 |
| CASTIGLIONI, AIMEE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/20/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225412. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.