Jesmond Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 37.9 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.00 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.61 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-08-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in nutritional status resulting in a hospitalization for dehydration and hypernatremia for one Resident (#24), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #24's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated he/she was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and the staff assessed him/her to have severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #24 was dependent on staff for all daily care tasks. Review of Resident #24's care plans indicated a hydration care plan last revised 7/9/24, with the following intervention: -Monitor/document/report to MD PRN s/sx (signs/symptoms) of dehydration: decreased or no urine output, concentrated urine, strong odor, tenting skin, cracked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to address the nutrition and hydration status of two Residents (#24, #32) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) provide one Resident (#24) with nutritional intervention leading to a diagnosis of severe dehydration. 2) Ensure Resident #32's documented significant weight losses and weight gains were addressed by the Registered Dietitian and develop a resident focused care plan for nutrition care. Findings include: 1) Review of the policy titled, Resident Hydration and Prevention of Dehydration, undated, indicated the following: -If potential inadequate intake and/or signs and symptoms of dehydration are observed, intake and output monitoring will be initiated and incorporated into the care plan. ADL status, diagnosis, individual preferences, habits, and cognitive and medical status will be considered in all interventions. Physician will be informed. -Nursing will monitor and document fluid intake and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide a dignified experience for one Resident (#11) out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically: for Resident #11 the facility failed to ensure the Resident was provided dignity during activities of daily living (ADL) care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dignity and Respect dated revised 8/1/24, indicated that the facility will ensure that all residents are treated with dignity and respect. Further review indicated that the intent of the policy includes maintaining resident privacy of body. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with diagnoses including severe dementia with psychotic disturbance, stroke and malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #11 is severely cognitively impaired, scoring a 4 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam. Further review indicated that Resident #11 requires assistance with ADL…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#5), out of total of 15 residents that the Health Care Proxy (a document executed in advance which designates a Health Care Agent, to make informed medical decisions, when a person is determined by a medical provider to lack the capacity to make health care decisions) was activated in accordance to standards of practice. Findings include: Review of the document titled 'GENERAL LAWS OF MASSACHUSETTS CHAPTER 201D. HEALTH CARE PROXIES.' Included but not limited to the following: Chapter 201D: Section 6. Incapacity of patient; regained capacity Section 6. The authority of a health care agent shall begin after a determination is made, pursuant to the provisions of this section, that the principal lacks the capacity to make or to communicate health care decisions. Such determination shall be made by the attending physician according to accepted standards of medical judgment. The determination shall be in writing and shall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for one Resident (#10) out of sample of 15 residents. Specifically, for Resident #10, the facility failed to assess the Resident's respiratory status and response to therapy.Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Oxygen Administration and Storage, undated, indicated the following:-Review Physician Order for instructions regarding flow rate (liters/minute), means of administration (mask or cannula), and whether oxygen is to be administered on a continuous or PRN (as needed) basis. If ordered, PRN, indications for use must be included in the order.Review of the facility policy, titled Respiratory Care Policy, dated as last reviewed 7/25/24, indicated the following:To provide safe, effective, and consistent respiratory care to residents requiring respiratory support in the facility.-Respiratory services shall be provided in accordance with physician orders, resident needs, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for five dependent Residents (#1, #2, #38, #19, #12) out of a total sample of 20 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) Provide incontinence care timely and in accordance with the plan of care for Resident #1. 2) Provide supervision while eating for three Residents (#2, #38, #19). 3) Provide showers as ordered for Resident #12. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living, effective date 01/01/2015 indicated the following: A program of activities of daily living (ADL) is provided to residents by the following method: The ability of each resident to meet the demands of daily living is assessed by a licensed nurse and/or member of the interdisciplinary team. A program of assistance and instruction in ADL skills is implemented. Assistive devices and adaptive equipment are provided by occupational therapy services. Educations is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were followed, resulting in one Resident (#24) being transferred to the hospital, out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Advanced Care Planning, dated [DATE], indicated the following: -Individuals will have the opportunity to discuss preferences for care and treatment upon admission and to establish written directives, preferences, and choices for care and treatment in the event that the individual becomes unable to continue to express his or her wishes at a later time. -Known as an Advanced Care Plan, these preferences, directives, and choices will guide care and treatment for individuals who can no longer express their goals for care or make treatment choices. -Advanced Care Planning is a process enabling a patient to express wishes about his or her future health care in consultation with health care providers, family members and other important people in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#1) was free from neglect, out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement an established care plan for incontinence care resulting in incontinence care not being provided in a timely manner. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Abuse/Mistreatment/Neglect/Exploitation Misappropriation of Property Policy, not dated indicated the following: It is the policy of the facility that each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. Further, each resident at the facility will be treated with respect and dignity at all times. Definitions Neglect: failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm mental anguish or mental illness. In determining whether or not neglect has occurred the following standards shall apply:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a restraint assessment for one Resident (#36) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to complete a bed safety assessment prior to adding a bolster pillow in the Resident's bed. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Restraints' with no revision date indicated the following: -Definitions-Physical restraint-any manual or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. -Goal-To provide a systematic method of evaluating and monitoring restraint use to assure utilization of the least restrictive method and medical necessity. -It is the facility policy that the resident has the right to be free from any physical restraint imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the plan of care for three Residents (#25, #26 and #41) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility 1) Failed to follow a physician's order to provide an air mattress for Resident #25. 2) Failed to offload Resident #26's heels as written in his/her care plan. 3) Failed to offload Resident #41's right heel as ordered by the physician. Findings include: 1. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility in April 2018 with diagnoses including diabetes. Review of Resident #25's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated he/she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of a possible 15 which indicated he/she has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #25 is dependent on staff for bed mobility tasks. Review of Resident #25's physician orders indicated the following order initiated on 4/27/23: - Air Mattress - check function and settings #130 (pounds) every shift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was implemented as ordered for one Resident (#25) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain blood pressure parameters as ordered. Findings include: Resident #25 was admitted to the facility in April 2028 with diagnoses including cardiomyopathy. Review of Resident #25's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she scored a 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident was cognitively intact. During a medication observation pass on 8/13/24 at 9:15 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #1 prepare and administer medications to Resident #25 including metoprolol 12.5 mg (milligram). Review of Resident #25's physician orders for the month of August 2024 indicated the following order: -Metoprolol succinate tab 25 mg (milligram) extended release. Give 12.5 mg orally one time a day related to cardiomyopathy. Hold for systolic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement the medical plan of care for two Residents (#28, #32) who are assessed as high risk for developing pressure ulcers, out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the weekly skin assessments for both residents were not completed in accordance with the physician's orders. Findings include: 1) Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with diagnoses that include but are not limited to unspecified dementia, Parkinson's disease, congested heart failure, and anemia. Review of Resident #28's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #28 scored a 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating he/she as having moderate cognition, is dependent on staff for bathing, toileting, dressing and is at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #28's medical record indicated the following: -The Norton Scale for Predicating Risk of Developing Pressure Ulcers dated 12/2/23 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$56,375 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $56,375 — penalty dated 2024-08-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $600K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA