Mary Ann Morse Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 364 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 152 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 108.0 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided treatments in accordance with professional standards of practice for three Residents (#203, #204 and #207) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #203, the facility failed to ensure that its staff removed a post operative dressing in a timely manner, as ordered by the Physician, which resulted in a deterioration of the surgical incision. 2. For Resident #204, the facility failed to ensure that its staff obtained Physician's orders for the application of an ace wrap bandage to the right lower extremity, and the frequency of which to change it. 3. For Resident #207, the facility failed to ensure that its staff obtained Physician's orders for the application of a foam adhesive dressing to the coccyx (tailbone), and the frequency of which to change it. Findings include: Review of the facility's Treatment Policy, dated 2/6/10, indicated the following: -Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide treatments (e.g. changing dressing of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews and observations for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had been assessed as having moderately impaired cognition, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with an adequate level of staff supervision to prevent an incident of elopement, when on 04/30/26 at 3:00 A.M., Resident #1 was able to exit his/her unit and the Facility, undetected by staff and was found on a loading dock of a neighboring Facility about 150 yards away. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Missing Persons Policy (Absent Without Leave), dated as last revised 08/23/24, indicated the following;-Unit Clinical Staff are required to know the location of each resident at all times of day; and-Unit Charge Nurse is responsible for assuring that each unit resident's location is known and accounted for in a manner that relies upon formal communications and data systems.Review of the report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record and policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#307) out of a total sample of 22 residents, was afforded the ability to review/sign documents pertaining to his/her medical care. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #307, who was identified as his/her own person and was able to make his/her own decisions, was able to review and sign documentation relative to Advanced Directives (life sustaining measures), side rail consent, self-administration of medication consent and consent for the use of psychotropic medications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled MOLST (Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment), dated 1/2014, indicated the following: -The admitting nurse will note the existence of the MOLST form in the nursing notes and on the Physician's Orders. -Confirm with the patient/resident or their legally recognized healthcare agent that the MOLST form in hand has not been revoked or changed by a subsequent MOLST form. -A qualified health care provider, a licensed nurse or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that Advance Directives (legal documents that provide instructions for medical care and only go into effect if you are unable to communicate your own wishes) were accurate for two Residents (#33 and #37) out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. for Resident #33, ensure that the MOLST (Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment: a form completed by the Resident to indicate their wishes for treatment to sustain their life in emergency situations in case they are not able to make their wishes known) was maintained as part of the Resident's active medical record and was accessible to facility staff in the event the Resident had a change in condition. 2. for Resident #37, ensure that the Physician's orders matched the Resident's current MOLST. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled MOLST (Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment), dated January 2014, indicated:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device)/skin injuries for one Resident (#357) out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, for Resident #357, the facility failed to ensure: 1. that a Licensed Nurse completed an assessment after a Certified Nurses Aide's (CNA) observation of an alteration to the Resident's skin which resulted in the development of pressure ulcers for the Resident. 2. that the Community Physician recommendation for a therapeutic air mattress/alternating pump pad mattress was reviewed with the facility Physician. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Skin Conditions (Assessment of), revised January 2023, indicated the following: -It is the policy of the facility to routinely assess and report resident skin condition, implement preventative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and interventions for three Residents (#72, #63, and #94) out of a total of 22 sampled residents, who were diagnosed with Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory and loss of judgment), to attain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1a. provide individualized interventions when Resident #72 and Resident #63 were engaged in verbal interactions and Resident #72 directed undignified statements toward Resident #63. 1b. respond timely to Resident #63's requests to disengage in an activity when the Resident voiced that he/she did not want to participate, and the Resident's escalating symptoms and behaviors were not immediately addressed by the Activities staff. 1c. respond promptly to Resident #63 when the Resident initiated a request to use the bathroom. 2. provide appropriate individualized interventions for Resident #94, when the Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors during the medication pass process for one Resident (#207) out of five residents observed, out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, for Resident #207, the facility staff failed to administer the Sevelamer medication (phosphate binder -used to control high blood levels of phosphorus in people with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis [the process of cleansing the blood by passing it through a special machine, necessary when the kidneys are unable to filter the blood]) timely and with meals as required. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration; Information Needed, revised 5/2012 indicated: -To ensure resident/patient safety, the facility will define what information will be available to the licensed nursing staff who administer medications. -Other resources are available if the licensed staff has questions relating to medication administration, for example: Current Nursing Drug…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one Resident (#81), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, For Resident #81, the facility failed to: -maintain accurate documentation of advanced directives (legal documents that provide instructions for medical care and only go into effect if you are unable to communicate your own wishes) when the MOLST (Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form was not signed by the Resident. -maintain accurate documentation of the Resident's code status (advanced directives) on the dialysis (the process of cleansing the blood by passing it through a special machine, necessary when the kidneys are unable to filter the blood) communication sheet sent from the facility to the dialysis center which would inform the dialysis staff on the appropriate response for the Resident in the event of a cardiac emergency. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Physician's orders: Receiving and Noting Of, revised March 2016, indicated:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards to prevent the potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections within the facility on two Units (Birch and Cedar) out of three total Units. Specially, the facility failed to ensure: 1. On the Cedar Unit, that staff utilized the indicated Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-items such as gowns, gloves, etc. worn to protect the wearer for exposure to potential infection or from exposing the care recipient to potential infection) while caring for a Resident (#357) on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - protective barrier gowns and gloves used as an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms [MDROs] during high contact resident care). 2. On the Birch Unit, that staff cleaned and disinfected glucometers (multiuse device used to check blood sugar levels) between use on multiple residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that Pneumococcal (any infection caused by bacteria called Streptococcus Pneumoniae, or Pneumococcus that can range from ear and sinus infections to Pneumonia and blood stream infections) Vaccinations were offered to three Residents (#72, #33, #2) out of five applicable residents, out of a total sample of 22 residents, increasing the residents risk for developing facility acquired Pneumococcal infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Offer Resident #72 an updated Pneumococcal Vaccine when the Resident was not up to date and was eligible to receive an updated vaccine. 2. Offer Resident #33 an updated Pneumococcal Vaccine when the Resident was not up to date and was eligible to receive an updated vaccine. 3. Offer Resident #2 an updated Pneumococcal Vaccine when the Resident was not up to date and was eligible to receive an updated vaccine. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccines for three Residents (#33, #2, and #81), out of five residents reviewed for immunizations, out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #33, to provide education regarding the benefits and risks and potential side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccine prior to administration of the vaccine. 2. For Resident #2, to provide education regarding the benefits and risks and potential side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccine prior to administration of the vaccine. 3. For Resident #81, to provide education regarding changes in the benefits and risks of additional COVID-19 vaccination doses. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Vaccination of Residents, revised August 2016, indicated: -Prior to receiving vaccinations, the resident or legal representative will be provided with information regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA