Stone Rehabilitation And Senior Living

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 119 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 32.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 101 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 76.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Plan of Care indicated that he/she required the use of a Spryte lift (mobility stand aid that supports a person's body weight to help them stand up from a seated position) with assistance of two staff members for transfers from chair to bed, the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff implemented and followed interventions identified in his/her Plan of Care while meeting his/her needs to transfer, when on 01/14/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 transferred Resident #1 from his/her wheelchair into bed without the use of a Spryte lift and without another staff member present to assist her. As CNA #1 turned and sat Resident #1 on the side of the bed, his/her left leg hit the side rail, which resulted in a laceration (open wound) to his/her left lower extremity, which required eight sutures to close. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Care Plans-Comprehensive, undated, indicated the following: -an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required the use of a Spryte lift (mobility stand aid that supports a person's body weight to help them stand up from a seated position) with assistance of two staff members for transfers from chair to bed, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance and assistive device to maintain his/her safety, in an effort to prevent an incident/accident resulting in an injury, when on 01/14/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 transferred Resident #1 from wheelchair into bed without the use of a Spryte lift and without another staff member present to assist her. Resident #1's left leg hit the side rail of the bed during the completion of the transfer, and he/she sustained a laceration (open wound) to his/her left lower extremity, which required eight sutures to close. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Activities of Daily Living, undated, indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections on two of two units. Specifically:1.The facility failed to disinfect vital sign machines between residents.2. The facility failed to ensure staff opened personal milk cartons in a sanitary manner.Findings include: 1. On 3/11/26 at 6:48 A.M., the surveyor observed a nurse taking vital signs on a resident. The Nurse then exited the room with the vital signs tower, and without disinfecting the tower or equipment, entered another resident's room and took their vital signs. At 6:51 A.M., the nurse exited the second resident's room after checking vital signs, and without disinfecting the vital signs tower, entered the room of a third resident and obtained vital signs on the resident. At 6:53 A.M., the nurse exited the third resident's room, and without disinfecting the vital signs tower, entered the room of a fourth resident and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person- centered care plan for two Residents (#34 and #66) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically,1.For Resident #34 the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan within seven days of completing the Admission/ 5-day Minimum Data Set assessment.2. For Resident #66 the facility failed to implement the use of ted stockings (compression stockings) and Geri-sleeves (used to protect fragile skin). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plans, undated, indicated the following: -An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. 1. Our facility's Care Planning/ Interdisciplinary Team, in coordination with the resident. his/her family or representative, develops and maintains a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) was provided for one Resident (#34) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, for Resident #34 the facility failed to provide supervision/ touching assistance with meals as per the plan of care.Findings include:Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in January 2026 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, sleep apnea, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/30/26, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 8 out of a possible 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated supervision or touching assistance was required for eating. Further review indicated that rejection of care was not a behavior exhibited by the resident. On 3/10/26 at 8:39 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #34 sitting up in his/her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC: a flexible tube inserted through a vein in one's arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart, used to deliver medications intravenously [IV] ), consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#6), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, for Resident #6, the facility failed to ensure that the insertion site was able to be visualized. Findings include:Review of facility policy titled PICC Line Management, undated, indicated the following:-Nurse should inspect PICC line site evert shift and report to MD/NP any signs of infiltration, infection, increased redness or swelling, pain or any other issues.-PICC line dressings should be changed at least weekly with a transparent dressing.Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in February 2026 with diagnoses that included encounter for orthopedic aftercare, broken internal left hip prosthesis and history of falling. Review of the Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for one Resident (#73) out of a sample of 21 residents. Specifically, for Resident #73, the facility failed to provide oxygen to the Resident as indicated in the physician's orders.Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, undated, indicated the following:-Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure unless needed for emergent reasons. Review physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Resident #73 was admitted to the facility in February 2026 with diagnoses that included dementia, depression and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review Resident #73's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Further review of the MDS indicated the use of continuous oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when two out of two nurses observed made ten errors out of 33 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 30.3%. Those errors impacted two Residents (#44 and #76) out of two residents observed. Specifically, 1. For Resident # 44, Nurse #5 administered the wrong dose of Mucinex. 2. For Resident #76, Nurse #3 omitted nine medications, three of those medications were controlled substances and administered an as needed medication in replacement of a scheduled medication when the Resident did not ask for an as needed medication. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Administering Medications', undated, indicated the following: -Policy Statement: Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. -4. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. -9. The individual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly follow sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the risk of foodborne illness in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Review of the facility policy titled Food Handling, undated, indicated the following: - Food will be stored, prepared, handled and served so that the risk of foodborne illness is minimized. Critical Factors in Foodborne Illness 1. This facility recognizes that the critical factors implicated in foodborne illness are: c. Contaminated equipment; and d. Unsafe food sources. Minimizing Foodborne Illness 2. With these factors as the primary focus of preventative measures, this facility strives to minimize the risk of foodborne illness to our residents. Employee Training in Food Handling Practices 3. All employees who handle, prepare or serve food will be training in the practices of safe food handling and preventing foodborne illness. Employees will demonstrate knowledge in these practices prior to working with food or serving food to residents. The surveyor made the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to keep one Resident (#68) free from verbal abuse out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, Nurse #8 threatened to move Resident (#68) to the TV room alone if the resident did not stop yelling. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, undated, indicated the following: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. Preventing Abuse 1. Our facility is committed to upholding our residents' right to be free from abuse, neglect and exploitation, from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual. 2. Our facility does not condone resident abuse by anyone, including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and records reviewed, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for two Residents (#21 and #8 ) out of a total of sample of 19 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #21, the facility failed to clarify two physician orders for a Lidocaine patch (a patch used to treat pain) prior to administration. 2. For Resident #8, the facility failed to ensure an air mattress was checked for proper function as per the physician's orders. Findings include: 1. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with diagnoses that included multiple fractures of ribs, right side, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, cognitive communication deficit, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #21's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/1/25, indicated he/she scored a 9 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident has moderately impaired cognition. On 4/9/25 at 8:54 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #21 propelling him/herself in a wheelchair in the hall. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#282), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow physician orders to obtain daily weights for a resident with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (a condition when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should causing a potential for fluid buildup/weight gain), and administer a diuretic (medication used to eliminate excess fluid) if weight is elevated, when Resident #282 was found to have a seven pound weight gain in two days. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, undated, included but was not limited to: -The multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for our residents. -Weight Assessment/ Weight Measurements 1. The nursing staff will measure resident weighs on admission or within 24 hours, if resident is able or willing to participate, and as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,195 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,195 — penalty dated 2024-02-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 42 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $522K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA