Springside Rehabilitation And Skilled Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 46% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 102.0 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication pass error rate of less than five percent (%) for one Resident (#39), of four applicable residents, out of 29 medication pass opportunities. The medication error rate was observed to be 6.9%. Specifically, 1. For Resident #39, the Resident was administered Memantine (a medication used to treat memory loss) capsule and Depakote Sprinkles (a medication used for seizures and various psychiatric symptoms) capsule by opening the capsules and crushing the inside sprinkle capsules placing the Resident at risk of having less efficacy of the prescribed medications. Findings include: Review of the Mayo Clinic's Drug and Supplement information (www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements) for Memantine and Depakote Sprinkles indicated the following: -Memantine >Swallow the extended-release capsules whole. Do not break, crush, or chew them. >If you cannot swallow the extended-release capsule, you may open it and pour the medicine into a small amount of soft food such as applesauce. Stir this mixture well…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards to prevent the potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one Resident (#112), of one applicable Resident reviewed with an intravenous access site, out of a total of 21 sampled Residents. Specifically, for Resident #112, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed as indicated after removal of gloves to prevent potential cross-contamination during an intravenous (IV) medication administration. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, reviewed August 2015, indicated the following: -This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. -Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62 percent (%) alcohol; or alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: >before and after direct contact with residents >before and after handling an invasive device (e.g., urinary catheters, IV access sites) >after removing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-16 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff assessed and offered COVID-19 vaccination as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for three Residents (#13, #45, and #53) out of a total sample of five residents. Specifically, for Residents #13, #45, #53 the facility failed to offer a second dose of the current COVID-19 2023 - 2024 vaccination as recommended to by the CDC when a person is over the age of 65. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled COVID-19 Vaccine Policy and Procedure, dated 11/21/23, indicated the following: -COVID-19 vaccinations will be offered to all staff and residents (or their representatives if they cannot make health care decisions) per CDC and/or Food and Drug Administration (FD) guidelines . Review of the CDC website Clinical Guidance for COVID-19 Vaccination | CDC, last reviewed 4/4/24, indicated the following: -Special situation for people ages 65 years and older: >People ages 65 years and older…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the accuracy and safety of administered routine medications and pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs of each facility resident for one Resident (#30) out of a total sample of 18 residents, and one medication cart (Unit A-side one) out of four medication carts observed. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that expired Insulin (a hormone used to control high blood sugar) medications for Resident #30 was removed from the Unit A- side one medication cart, so that they could not be administered to the Resident thus increasing his/her risk for high blood sugar levels (hyperglycemia) due to the decreased effectiveness of the expired medication. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated 9/2023 indicated the following: -The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the Physician documented the rationale for disagreeing with the Consultant Pharmacist recommendation from the Monthly Medication Review for one Resident (#34) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, for Resident #34, the Physician failed to document why he/she disagreed with the Consultant Pharmacist medication recommendation to change the Vitamin D3 (D3 - fat-soluble vitamin that helps the body to absorb calcium and phosphorus) medication to a monthly dose from a daily/weekly dose. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Timely Response to Pharmacist Comment, undated, indicated the following: -Physicians shall respond timely to the Pharmacist comment directed to Physicians on the Pharmacist/Physician Progress Note, sign, and date. Review of the facility policy titled Essential Guidelines for Licensed Independent Practitioners, dated 9/23, indicated the following: -Pharmacy recommendations require a written response within the medical record. Resident #34 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide a medication regimen that was free from unnecessary medications for one Resident (#296) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that a Physician's order for Torsemide (a potent loop diuretic [water pills that act on the kidneys to increase the flow of urine] medication used to treat fluid retention) medication was accurately transcribed resulting in Resident #296 receiving extra doses of medication and putting him/her at risk for dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, hypotension (low blood pressure) and sudden cardiac arrhythmias (irregular heartbeats). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Reconciliation dated 9/2023, indicated the following: -Purpose: to prevent or reduce medication errors which occur when patients/residents transition from one healthcare setting to another. Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, dated 12/2012 indicated the following: -Medications must be administered in accordance with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that routine dental services were provided for one Resident (#18) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to assist Resident #18 in arranging for and obtaining routine dental services when the Resident consented to receive dental services while residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dental Services, reviewed 9/2022, indicated the following: -The facility must provide or obtain from an outside resource, routine, and emergency dental services to meet the needs of each resident. -The facility is responsible for assisting residents in obtaining needed dental services, including routine and emergency dental services. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in May 2023, with diagnoses including obstructive and reflux uropathy (occurs when urine cannot flow normally through the urinary tract due to obstructed urinary flow which can cause back-up of urine into the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that complete and accurate information was maintained for one Resident (#18) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to document urinary output each shift per the Physician orders for a Resident with urinary retention (condition that occurs when a person is unable to empty their bladder completely or partially of urine) placing him/her at an increased risk of further retention, urinary tract infections, and compromised bladder and kidney function. Findings include: Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in May 2023, with diagnoses including obstructive and reflux uropathy (occurs when urine cannot flow normally through the urinary tract due to obstructed urinary flow which can cause back-up of urine into the kidneys). Review of the facility policy titled Intake and Output, reviewed 9/2023 indicated the following: -All residents/patients with a Foley (urinary) catheter will have output recorded for the duration of their therapy. On 7/11/24 at 11:49 A.M., the surveyor observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2) who had moderate cognitive impairment, but could make his/her needs known, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when at 5:00 A.M. on 09/02/23 and witnessed by Nurse #1, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 directed profanities at Resident #2 and unplugged his/her television (TV) after threatening to do so, if he/she would not be quiet. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Code of Conduct, dated as revised 03/28/23, indicated that staff must ensure that its residents are treated with dignity and respect, and that residents are never subject, at any time, to any verbal, mental or physical abuse, corporal punishment, or involuntary seclusion. Resident #2 was admitted to the Facility in April 2023 with diagnoses including muscle weakness and partial intestinal obstruction. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 07/19/23, indicated he/she was moderately cognitively impaired with a score of 11 out of 15 on the Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2023-03-06 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility and its staff failed to provide a designated person that met regulatory requirements, to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services when a full-time Dietitian was not employed. Findings include: During an interview on 3/3/23 at 1:01 P.M., the Food Service Director (FSD) said that she had worked as the FSD at the facility for about one week. The FSD said she was not a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), or Certified Food Service Manager (CFSM), did not have an associate degree or higher in food service management, and did not have two years' experience in the position of Director of Food and Nutrition Services in a nursing facility setting. During an interview on 3/3/23 at 1:44 P.M., the Administrator said the Dietitian worked part-time at the facility. She said that the FSD was not a CDM or CFSM and did not have a qualifying degree or experience as required.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $567K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA