Oceanside Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 87.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 65.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-06-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve what was listed on the menu or provide a substitution for two lunch meals. Specifically, on 6/8/25 the facility failed to serve sour cream with the baked potato during the lunch meal and on 6/9/25 the facility failed to add meat to the baked ziti according to the facility's recipe during the lunch meal. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Food Presentation, undated, indicated the following: - Foods are prepared according to standard recipes. During the resident group meeting on 6/8/25 at 1:30 P.M. the surveyor met with Residents and the following complaints were made by four residents: - Menus were not always followed. - Should have condiments like sour cream with a baked potato. On 6/8/25 at 12:10 P.M., the surveyor observed lunch being delivered to residents' rooms. The main lunch meal consisted of a slice of pork, brussels sprouts, a baked potato, margarine, and watermelon. Review of the recipe for lunch, 6/8/25, indicated the baked potato was to be served with sour cream. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable, and at a safe and appetizing temperature, on two of two units. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Serving Temperatures, not dated, indicated that foods will be maintained at proper holding temperatures to ensure food safety. The temperature of potentially hazardous cold foods will not be greater than 45 F (degrees Fahrenheit) when served to the resident. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Presentation, not dated, indicated that foods will be served at proper temperatures. Hot foods hot and cold foods cold. During the initial tour of the facility on 6/8/25 the surveyors met with residents. Thirteen residents voiced dissatisfaction with the temperature and/or taste of the food served at the facility. During the resident group meeting on 6/8/25 at 1:30 P.M. the surveyor met with Residents and the following complaints were made by four residents: - The foods that were cold were not always…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#36) out of a total sample of 18 residents did not self-administer medication without an assessment or physician's order. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications dated as revised February 2021 indicated that as part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. Further review indicated that if it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the care plan. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including asthma, amputation of toe multiple sites and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/5/25, indicated that Resident #36 is cognitively intact as evidence by a score of 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for one Resident (#27) out of sample of 18 residents. Specifically, for Resident #27, the facility failed to change oxygen tubing as indicated in the physician's orders and the facility failed to ensure staff consistently stored oxygen tubing in a sanitary manner when not in use. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated as revised October 2010, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Preparation 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and dyspnea (difficulty breathing). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/28/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to consistently accommodate resident food allergies for one Resident (#26) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, for Resident #26 a. the facility failed to ensure the kitchen did not serve the Resident eggs which were listed as an allergy on his/her diet ticket, and eggs are served/offered 17 times during a 28 day menu cycle and b. the facility failed to consistently document food allergies in the medical record and on the diet ticket, including an allergy to peaches on his/her diet ticket which is offered as a dessert five times during a 28 day menu cycle. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Allergies, undated, indicated during hours of food service operation, the kitchen will make reasonable accommodations for patients with life threatening allergies and all other food allergies. 1. Obtain copy of diet prescription order form with specific food allergies from nursing services. 2. Dietary services will list food allergies on tray card. 3. Dietary services will make…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to properly store food items to prevent the risk of foodborne illness and in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Preventing Foodborne Illness - Food Handling, revised July 2014, indicated the following: - Food will be stored, prepared, handled and served so that the risk of foodborne illness is minimalized. - Functioning of the refrigeration and food temperatures will be monitored at designated intervals throughout the day and documented according to state-specific requirements. Federal standards require that refrigerated food be stored below 41 degrees F (Fahrenheit). The surveyor made the following observations during the initial kitchen walkthrough on 7/16/24 at 7:15 A.M.: In the reach-in refrigerator: - A hanging thermometer displaying a temperature of 50 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident food was stored in the refrigerator and the refrigerator felt warm and had a musty smell to it. - A container containing what resembled red…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program to promote and monitor the appropriate use of antibiotics which are used to guide decisions for evaluating antibiotic prescribing patterns in accordance with the Antibiotic Stewardship Program. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled: The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The purpose of an antibiotic stewardship program is to improve the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance. - Antibiotic stewardship refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. - The CDC recommends that all nursing homes take steps to improve antibiotic prescribing practices and reduce inappropriate use. - Any action taken to improve antibiotic use is expected to reduce adverse events,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that equipment in the kitchen was functioning properly. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that a reach-in refrigerator was operating at the proper temperature while resident food was being stored inside of it. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Preventing Foodborne Illness - Food Handling, dated and revised July 2014, indicated the following: - Functioning of the refrigeration and food temperatures will be monitored at designated intervals throughout the day and documented according to state-specific requirements. Federal standards require that refrigerated food be stored below 41 degrees F (Fahrenheit). The surveyor made the following observations during the initial kitchen walkthrough on 7/16/24 at 7:15 A.M.: In the reach-in refrigerator: - A hanging thermometer displaying a temperature of 50 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident food was stored in the refrigerator and the refrigerator felt warm and had a musty smell to it. During the revisit to the kitchen on 7/17/24 at 7:45…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to develop an individualized, comprehensive care plan for one Resident (#43) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #43 related to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus . Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated March 2022, indicted the following: - A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. - The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. - The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven (7) days of the completion of the required MDS assessment and no more than 21 days after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for an air mattress prior to the resident using one. Findings include: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition and polyosteoarthritis. Review of Resident #10's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of a possible 15 indicated severe cognitive impairment. Further review of Resident #10's MDS indicated that he/she requires assistance with all activities of daily living. The surveyor made the following observations: - On 7/16/24 at 7:34 A.M. and 11:58 A.M., Resident #10 was observed laying in his/her bed which was an air mattress set to 80 pounds. - On 7/17/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA