Oceanside Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 87.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 65.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.08 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the facility menus for three of the four observed meals on two of two units.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Menus, undated, indicated the following:- Menu planning is the responsibility of the Dietary Manager. Menus are implemented by the Dietary Manager in conjunction with the Dietitian.- When changes in the menus are needed, changes must provide equal nutritive value. Menu changes are made in the menu system in Dietary before the meal is served. Menu changes are reviewed and approved in advance by the Dietitian.Review of the facility food menus provided to the surveyors upon entrance to the facility indicated the following for the current Week 1 menus:- Sunday Breakfast: Orange Juice, Egg Burrito, Cereal of choice, Banana, Coffee/Tea, milk- Sunday Lunch: Turkey Sandwich, Ham and Bean soup, Carrot/Raisin Salad, Beverage of choice- Monday Breakfast: Orange Juice, Sausage Patty, Cereal of Choice, French Toast, Milk, Coffee/Tea, Margarine, Syrup- Monday Lunch: Chicken Tenders, French…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and test tray results, the facility failed to ensure foods provided to the residents were prepared by methods that conserve palatability and are at appetizing temperatures on the Seaside Unit, [NAME] Unit, and for Residents eating in the dining room.Findings include:During initial resident screening and interviews numerous residents of the facility expressed concern to the surveyors regarding the quality and the temperature of the food, especially lunch and dinner meals.During the Resident Group Interview on 5/18/26 at 11:00 A.M., multiple Residents said the breakfast meal is much better than lunch and dinner.On 5/18/26, the surveyors conducted two test trays for the lunch meal in the facility. The Results were as followed:On the Seaside Unit, the meal delivery truck arrived on the unit 11:54 A.M., and at 12:04 P.M., the last resident meal tray was passed, and the surveyor took the test tray. The following was recorded:- The chicken tenders were 126.3 degrees Fahrenheit (F), lukewarm and had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly follow food storage and food handling practices to prevent the risk of foodborne illness in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically:1. The facility failed to properly store food items in the kitchen and kitchenette to prevent the risk of foodborne illness.2. The failed to properly follow food handling and hand hygiene practices on the tray line to prevent the risk of foodborne illness in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Food Storage, undated, indicated the following:- Sufficient storage facilities are provided to keep foods safe, wholesome, and appetizing.- Metal or plastic containers with tight fitting covers must be used for storing cereals, cereal products, flour. All containers must be legibly and accurately labeled.- Leftover food is stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely. Each item is clearly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a wound treatment was completed as ordered for one Resident (#4), out of a total of 17 sampled Residents. Findings include: Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019 indicated the following: The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice.Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated the following: Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in emergent and non-emergent situations. Licensed nurses in a management role must ensure an infrastructure is in place, consistent with current standards of care, to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing therapy services were provided for one Resident (#38) out of a total of 17 sampled Residents. Findings include: Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) indicated Resident #38 is moderately cognitively impaired as evidenced by a score of 11 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam (BIMS). The MDS also indicated Resident #38 scored 11 on the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) indicating moderate depression. During an interview on 5/17/26 at 8:11 AM., Resident #38 appeared depressed with a flat affect. Resident #38 said he/she was doing the best he/she could. Review of Resident #38's care plans indicated:Focus: Resident has a mood behavior r/t (related to) bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, 8/6/25Goal: Resident will have improved mood Interventions: Behavioral health consults as needed, (psych-geriatric…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve what was listed on the menu or provide a substitution for two lunch meals. Specifically, on 6/8/25 the facility failed to serve sour cream with the baked potato during the lunch meal and on 6/9/25 the facility failed to add meat to the baked ziti according to the facility's recipe during the lunch meal. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Food Presentation, undated, indicated the following: - Foods are prepared according to standard recipes. During the resident group meeting on 6/8/25 at 1:30 P.M. the surveyor met with Residents and the following complaints were made by four residents: - Menus were not always followed. - Should have condiments like sour cream with a baked potato. On 6/8/25 at 12:10 P.M., the surveyor observed lunch being delivered to residents' rooms. The main lunch meal consisted of a slice of pork, brussels sprouts, a baked potato, margarine, and watermelon. Review of the recipe for lunch, 6/8/25, indicated the baked potato was to be served with sour cream. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable, and at a safe and appetizing temperature, on two of two units. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Serving Temperatures, not dated, indicated that foods will be maintained at proper holding temperatures to ensure food safety. The temperature of potentially hazardous cold foods will not be greater than 45 F (degrees Fahrenheit) when served to the resident. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Presentation, not dated, indicated that foods will be served at proper temperatures. Hot foods hot and cold foods cold. During the initial tour of the facility on 6/8/25 the surveyors met with residents. Thirteen residents voiced dissatisfaction with the temperature and/or taste of the food served at the facility. During the resident group meeting on 6/8/25 at 1:30 P.M. the surveyor met with Residents and the following complaints were made by four residents: - The foods that were cold were not always…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#36) out of a total sample of 18 residents did not self-administer medication without an assessment or physician's order. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications dated as revised February 2021 indicated that as part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. Further review indicated that if it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the care plan. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including asthma, amputation of toe multiple sites and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/5/25, indicated that Resident #36 is cognitively intact as evidence by a score of 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for one Resident (#27) out of sample of 18 residents. Specifically, for Resident #27, the facility failed to change oxygen tubing as indicated in the physician's orders and the facility failed to ensure staff consistently stored oxygen tubing in a sanitary manner when not in use. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated as revised October 2010, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Preparation 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and dyspnea (difficulty breathing). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/28/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to consistently accommodate resident food allergies for one Resident (#26) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, for Resident #26 a. the facility failed to ensure the kitchen did not serve the Resident eggs which were listed as an allergy on his/her diet ticket, and eggs are served/offered 17 times during a 28 day menu cycle and b. the facility failed to consistently document food allergies in the medical record and on the diet ticket, including an allergy to peaches on his/her diet ticket which is offered as a dessert five times during a 28 day menu cycle. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Allergies, undated, indicated during hours of food service operation, the kitchen will make reasonable accommodations for patients with life threatening allergies and all other food allergies. 1. Obtain copy of diet prescription order form with specific food allergies from nursing services. 2. Dietary services will list food allergies on tray card. 3. Dietary services will make…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA