Foremost At Sharon LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 59.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#23), out of a total sample of 18 residents, received care and treatment to prevent and to promote healing of a pressure injury consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to implement treatments as ordered and notify the physician of worsening Moisture-Associated Skin Damage (MASD-inflammation and erosion of the skin caused by prolonged exposure to various sources of moisture, including urine or stool) resulting in a delay in treatment and deterioration of the wound to a stage 2 pressure ulcer (PU- partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis, presenting as a shallow open ulcer) to the Resident's left ischial tuberosity (bone in the lower part of the pelvis that absorbs weight when you sit). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk Assessment, revised March 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-06-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, for one Resident (#36), of 18 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide Foley catheter (a tube inserted through the urinary tract into the bladder, connected to a drainage bag to drain urine from the bladder) care and management consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, for Resident #36, the facility failed to: -Ensure his/her Foley catheter was properly positioned to ensure adequate drainage from the bladder, -Document care and maintenance of a Foley catheter, -Implement provider orders for Intake and Output (I&O) monitoring to ensure adequate output, and -Notify his/her provider of an abnormal radiology report resulting in Resident #36 being hospitalized for four days due to a malpositioned (wrong or faulty position) Foley catheter resulting in bilateral hydroureteronephrosis (swelling of both kidneys and ureters, a thin tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder, which occurs when urine can't drain and builds…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who developed Moisture-Associated Skin Damage (MASD) to his/her coccyx, the Facility failed to ensure they notified his/her Physician of the Wound Nurse Practitioner's recommendations for wound care and as a result, the treatment recommendations were never implemented.Findings include:Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Change of Condition in a Resident Status, dated 03/2017, indicated the Facility would notify the resident's physician when there had been a need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly. Review of the Facility Policy titled, Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk Assessment, dated as revised 03/2022, indicated to document in medical record addressing MD notification if new skin alteration noted with change of plan of care. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in August 2025, diagnoses included unspecified dementia, seizures, syncope and collapse, hypertension muscle weakness and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Review of the Wound Nurse Practitioner's Initial Progress Note,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident # 1), who developed a wound to his/her coccyx and required wound care, and required a sling to his/her left arm due to a fractured left clavicle, the Facility failed to ensure nursing developed and implemented a comprehensive person-centered care plan with interventions, treatment goals and outcomes that addressed, ) his/her wound care needs and 2) care and monitoring needs related to his/her fractured left clavicle. Findings include:Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated as revised April 2022, indicated that: - a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident;- the care planning process will include an assessment of residents' strengths and needs, reflect treatment goals, timetables and objectives in measurable outcomes;- assessments of resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who developed an open area to his/her coccyx and sustained a fracture to his/her left clavicle after a fall, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with quality of care that met professional standards of practice when 1) he/she was not seen by the facility's Wound Nurse Practitioner in a timely manner and 2) treatment orders from the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) related to the left clavicle fracture were not implemented.Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in August 2025, diagnoses included unspecified dementia, seizures, syncope and collapse, hypertension muscle weakness and type 2 diabetes mellitus.1) Review of Resident #1's Skin Observation Tools, dated 08/22/25, 08/27/25, and 9/12/25, indicated that a small open area was identified on his/her coccyx and would follow up with the Wound Nurse Practitioner.Review of Resident #1's Nurse Progress Note, dated 09/12/25, indicated that a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), who had developed an open area to his/her coccyx, and was non-weight bearing, required the use of a sling and monitoring by nursing due to a left clavicle fracture, the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record, when 1) there was no nursing documentation related to his/her coccyx wounds characteristics and progress towards healing and 2) there was no nursing documentation on his/her Treatment Administration Record (TAR) or Nurse Progress Notes to support nursing monitored Resident #1's left arm per Hospital Discharge Summary recommendations. Findings Include:Review of the Facility's Policy tilted, Charting and Documentation, dated as revised April 2022, indicated the following:-services provided to the resident to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with adequate supervision and effective interventions to prevent avoidable accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop effective interventions to prevent nine falls for one Resident (#26), out of a total sample of 15 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Falls and Fall Risk Managing, revised 3/2022, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: -Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. -The staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. -If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or different…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete an inspection of the bed rails, to identify areas of possible entrapment for three Residents (#1, #19, and #24), out of a sample of 15 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Residents #1 and #19, complete a new assessment of the bed, side rails and mattresses in active use for potential entrapment when the bed mattress was changed from the previously assessed mattresses, placing the Residents who had limited mobility and utilized bilateral side rails, at risk for possible entrapment; and 2. For Resident #24, to ensure the mattress bolster/extender (an object used to fill gaps between the mattress and footboard of a bed) was in place to fill the gap between the mattress and the footboard with the metal bed frame exposed, leaving the Resident at risk for entrapment and/or injury. Findings include: Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, dated 3/10/2006, indicated: The term entrapment describes an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and individualize comprehensive care plans for one Resident (#41), out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address the use of Buspirone (anti-anxiety), Trazodone (antidepressant also used to treat anxiety) and Sertraline (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used to treat anxiety) that identified Resident specific targeted behaviors, non-pharmacological interventions, and measurable goals of treatment. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, revised April 2022, included but was not limited to: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will include: -measurable objectives and timeframes; -describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, for one Resident (#26), of 15 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide timely dental services. Specifically, for Resident #26, the facility failed to initiate replacement of a broken/missing partial upper denture timely. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dental Services, revised 1/2025, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: -If dentures are damaged or lost, residents will be referred for dental services within 3 days. If the referral is not made within 3 days, documentation will be provided regarding what is being done to ensure that the resident is able to eat and drink adequately while awaiting the dental services; and the reason for the delay. -All dental services provided are recorded in the resident's medical record. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including dementia and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/7/25, indicated that Resident #26 was moderately cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards of practice to prevent contamination and the potential spread of infections for one Resident (#41), out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP: infection prevention practice of wearing gown and gloves to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms [MDRO's - bacteria that are resistant to three or more types of antimicrobial drugs]) when the Resident was identified as having wounds on his/her right foot. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last revised 9/2022, indicated but was not limited to: -Enhanced barrier precautions are an infection prevention intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug resistant organisms in the facility. The precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with an MDRO as well as those with an increased risk of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a water management program was implemented to minimize the risk of Legionella (bacteria that can cause Legionnaires' disease, a serious type of pneumonia) and other opportunistic pathogens in building water systems by accurately measuring and documenting water temperatures; 2. For Resident #211, ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) and perform hand hygiene as required for Contact Precautions (infection control precautions used for patients who may be infected with certain infectious agents for which additional precautions are needed to prevent infection transmission); and 3. For Resident #35, properly store an oral syringe to minimize the risk of contamination. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Legionella, last…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$26,232 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $26,232 — penalty dated 2024-06-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA