South Hadley Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
573 Granby Rd, South Hadley, MA 01075 · For profit - Individual · 132 certified beds · (413) 532-2200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.6% | 16.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 5.1% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.7% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.4% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 32.9% | 15.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.3% | 19.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.0% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.9% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.6% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.4% | 21.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.0% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.5% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.1% | 11.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.90 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.17 | 1.50 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.5%CMS range 38.7–55.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 8.6–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 33.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 29.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 88.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.1%CMS range 2.9–9.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.83 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 118.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-27 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — widespreadRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident beds were routinely inspected to identify areas of possible entrapment on three of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that resident bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, were inspected annually as part of a routine maintenance program. Findings include: During the initial entrance conference on 5/20/25 at 8:01 A.M., with the Administrator and the acting Director of Nursing (DON), the Administrator said the facility's capacity was 132 resident beds and the current census was 117 residents. During an interview on 5/23/25 at 2:58 P.M., the Director of Maintenance (DOM) said resident beds were to be inspected for entrapment risk yearly. The DOM said he had a kit that was utilized to measure the zones applicable for entrapment risk and included the mattress, side rails, head and foot boards. The DOM said the facility did not have a current policy relative to routine bed assessments, but that all resident beds should be inspected annually. The DOM provided the surveyor with the Bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1. Review the facility's IPCP standards, policies and procedures annually, placing residents and staff at risk for outdated standards of practice for preventing and controlling infections. 2. Develop, monitor, and implement the resident vaccination process within the facility relative to Influenza, Pneumococcal and Covid, placing residents at risk for infection. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated November 2024 and reviewed by QAA/QAPI committee in November 2024, indicated but was not limited to: -Services provided: a. Infection prevention and control: >Identification and containment of infections > .use of standard infection prevention and control practices >prevention of infections Review of the facility's policy titled Immunizations and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments that reflected the residents status as of the Assessment Reference Date for five Resident's (#80, #33, #68, #90 and #91), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #80, the facility staff failed to code the MDS assessment accurately relative to a pressure ulcer under Section M. 2. For Resident #33, the facility failed to complete the Pain Assessment under Section J with the Resident involvement, when the Resident had clear speech, was able to make him/herself understood, and understood others. 3. For Resident #68, the facility failed to accurately code skin conditions under Section M on the comprehensive MDS Assessment relative to surgical, diabetic and vascular wounds that were present. 4. For Resident #90, the facility failed to complete the Pain Assessment under Section J on an MDS Assessment when the Resident had clear speech and was able to make him/herself…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to podiatry services and skin assessment for one Resident (#110), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #110, the facility failed to: -implement podiatry recommendations when the Resident received podiatry care and services and was recommended to have continued wound treatment to the right great toe. -perform a weekly skin assessment as ordered, putting the Resident at risk for infection and delayed wound healing. Findings include: Resident #110 was admitted to the facility in November 2024, with diagnoses including chronic viral Hepatitis C, and Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/24/25, indicated Resident #110 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of a total possible score of 15. During an interview on 5/20/25 at 11:15 A.M., Resident #110 said that he/she was concerned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent and treat a pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) for one Resident (#40), of six applicable residents reviewed for pressure, out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to evaluate and monitor a pressure ulcer located on Resident #40's left ischium (left lower back of the hip bone) to help identify any wound changes, promote healing and prevent deterioration of the wound, infection, and new ulcers from developing. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention effective May 2023, indicated the following documentation to be recorded in the resident's medical record: -Any change in the resident's condition -All assessment data (i.e. wound bed color, size, drainage etc.) obtained when inspecting the wound -The type of wound care provided -The date and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#2), of four applicable residents reviewed with feeding tubes, in a total sample of 28 residents, had care and services in place for enteral feedings and gastrostomy site care. Specifically, for Resident #2, the facility failed to ensure Physician's orders were implemented and/or that orders were in place relative to enteral feeding (refers to any method of feeding that uses the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to deliver nutrition and calories) care including: -Gastrostomy (G-tube: surgical procedure for inserting a tube through the abdomen wall and into the stomach to administer medications, fluids and nutrition) site care. -Monitoring and recording residuals (amount of fluid or other contents remaining in the stomach after a feeding and a crucial indicator of gastric emptying and assist with assessing tolerance to the feeding). -Administration of the prescribed feedings when tube feeds and water boluses were not administered by staff due to the Resident being asleep. -Physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess for continued use of a prophylactic antibiotic, for one Resident (#63), of two applicable residents reviewed for antibiotic use, out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #63, the facility failed to: -ensure the Physician orders for the Infectious Disease (ID) and Endocrinology Consults were implemented as required. -coordinate ID and Endocrinology appointments to assess for the need/rationale for continued use of a prophylactic antibiotic (Ciprofloxacin) prescribed for chronic osteomyelitis, when the Resident requested to discontinue the medication. Findings include: Resident #63 was admitted to the facility in April 2021, with diagnoses including chronic osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), Diabetes and constipation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/11/24, indicated Resident #63: -was cognitively intact as evidenced by Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of possible 15 points. -received an antibiotic during the assessment period. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#90 and #181), out of a total of 28 sampled Residents, received laboratory services as ordered by the Physician. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #90, obtain weekly Complete Blood Count (CBC) and Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) labwork as ordered by the Physician. 2. For Resident #181, obtained Complete Blood Count (CBC) and Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) labwork as ordered by the Physician. Findings include: 1. Resident #90 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Cerebral Infarction (stroke). Review of the May 2025 Physician orders indicated the following: -Complete Blood Count (CBC: measures the number and characteristics of different types of blood cells) and Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP: blood test that provides broad overview of the body's metabolic health including kidney function, liver function, electrolyte balance, blood sugar and protein levels) every Monday, initiated 1/6/25 Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure completed and accurate medical records were maintained for three Residents (#15, #91 and #2), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #15, the facility failed to ensure that staff documented daily fluid intakes when Resident #15 was on a fluid restriction. 2. For Resident #91, the facility failed to ensure a dosage for Sodium Bicarbonate was included in the Physician's orders to ensure accurate administration of the medication when the Resident was being administered the medication without an ordered dosage. 3. For Resident #2, the facility failed to ensure accurate routes for medication administration were documented when the Resident was unsafe to receive medication/food/fluid by mouth. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Encouraging and Restricting Fluids, revised 10/2010, indicated the following: -Follow specific instruction concerning fluid intake or restrictions. -Be accurate when recording fluid intake. -Record fluid intake on the intake side of the intake…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pneumococcal vaccination history was maintained and/or that the Pneumococcal Vaccine was administered after consent was obtained to administer the vaccinations for three Residents (#15, #114, and #2), out of six applicable residents for immunizations. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #15, the Pneumococcal Vaccine was administered after the Resident consented to receive the updated Pneumococcal vaccinations as needed. 2. For Resident #114, the Pneumococcal Vaccine was administered after the Resident's Representative consented for the Resident to receive the updated Pneumococcal vaccinations as needed. 3. For Resident #2, the Pneumococcal Vaccine was administered when the Resident's Representative consented for the administration of the vaccine and the Resident had no history of previously receiving the Pneumococcal Vaccine. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Immunizations and Vaccines-Residents, effective 12/2022, indicated the following: -The resident's medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a COVID-19 vaccination policy for three Residents (#15, #114, and #2), out of a total of six applicable residents for immunization review. Specifically the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #15, that documentation was maintained relative to COVID-19 vaccination history, and that the most up-to-date COVID-19 Vaccine was administered when the Resident consented to receive it. 2. For Resident #114, that documentation was maintained relative COVID-19 vaccination history, and that the most up-to-date COVID-19 vaccine was provided when the Resident's Representative consented for the Resident to receive the most up-to-date COVID-19 Vaccines as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 3. For Resident #2, that the COVID-19 Vaccine was administered when the Resident Representative consented for Resident #2 to receive the vaccine. Findings include: 1. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in October 2025. Review of Resident #15's Immunization Consent Form, signed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored all drugs, and biologicals used in the facility in a secure manner, on three Units (East One, [NAME] Two, and East Two) of three units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure 1. on East One, one medication cart was locked when not in direct supervision of a licensed nurse, 2. on [NAME] Two, one medication cart and one treatment cart were locked when not in direct supervision of a licensed nurse, and 3. on East Two one medication cart was locked when not in direct supervision of a licensed nurse. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, effective date 1/2023, indicated the following: It is the policy of the facility that medications, treatments, and biological are stored safely, securely, and properly .The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. -Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked or attended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, the Facility, (who had an in-house census of 118 residents) failed to ensure the Director of Nurses (DON) did not serve as a charge nurse on a unit, when their daily occupancy rate was greater than 60 residents. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Job Description for the Director of Nurses, dated 12/2022, indicated the purpose of this position is to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operations of the Nursing Service Department in accordance with federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern our facility, and may be directed by the administrator, the Medical Director, and/or the Director of Nursing Services, to ensure that the highest degree of quality care is maintained at all times. Review of the Census Daily Report, dated 07/11/24, indicated the Facility Census was 118 and the total capacity was 132. Review of the Nursing Daily Schedule, dated 07/10/24, indicated the DON worked as a charge nurse on a unit, for the 7:00 A.M. through 3:00 P.M. shift. Review of the Nursing Daily Schedule,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policies reviewed, the facility failed to adhere to professional standards and the facility's policies for: 1. Food storage, preparation and service, and cleanliness of food preparation equipment in the facility's main kitchen, placing residents at risk for foodborne illness; and 2. Food storage, food equipment cleanliness, and reheating of resident food items in one Unit (West 2) Kitchenette out of three-unit kitchenettes observed. Specifically, the facility failed to: - Serve thoroughly cooked eggs at one breakfast meal when the eggs were not pasteurized. - Maintain cold food storage according to professional standards in the walk-in refrigerator. - Maintain food preparation equipment in a sanitary manner. - Maintain unit nourishment kitchens in a sanitary manner. - Provide equipment and proper instructions for staff to reheat resident food items according to food safety requirements. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Dietary-Proper Food Preparation, dated December 2022, indicated all foods would be prepared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records and policies reviewed, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and choices for one Resident (#17), out of 25 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: a. Provide seating, adequate for the Resident's condition, when the Resident was non-ambulatory (unable to walk) and required assistance from staff to get out of bed, increasing the Resident's for further physical debility and social isolation. b. Maintain an accurate record of the Resident's fluid intake and urinary output when the Resident's Physician ordered fluid intake and output monitoring and the Resident had a history of fluid overload (too much fluid in one's body that can cause swelling, high blood pressure, and impact organ function). c. Provide timely incontinent (loss of bladder control) care when the Resident had been incontinent of urine, was dependent on staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and records and policies reviewed, the facility failed to support the right for one Resident (#17), to participate in his/her care planning process, in a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to include Resident #17 in the interdisciplinary team (IDT) care plan review process when the Resident was his/her own responsible person, had a preference to be in bed, and the IDT met in a location not in the Resident's room to review Resident #17's plan of care, which impacted the Resident's ability to make choices about his/her plan of care and treatment interventions. Findings include: Review of the facility's Care Planning Policy, dated February 2023, indicated the following: - It was the policy of the facility that each resident . participate in the development of the resident's . care plans. - Residents . were invited to attend and participate in care planning conferences (admission, quarterly, annual, and significant change in status). - All care plans would be reviewed and revised by the clinical team and the resident .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for three Residents (#174, #30, and #67), out of 25 total residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to provide: 1. Resident #174 with a working call light or an alternative means to call for assistance; 2. Resident #30 with a wheelchair that accommodated the Resident's needs; and 3. Resident #67 with a seat cushion and leg rests for his/her wheelchair. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Answering the Call Light, dated 6/2022, indicated the following: -Some residents may not be able to use their call light. Be sure to check these residents frequently: and if applicable give the resident an alternative device . -Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor promptly. Resident #174 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with the following diagnoses: anxiety disorder (a mental illness that can cause constant fear and worry), bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to execute Advance Directives (written documents that instructs health care providers of the decisions for specific medical treatment if a person was unable to speak or lacked the capacity to make decisions for themselves) for one Resident (#115), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, for Resident #115, the facility failed to ensure that Advanced Directives on a completed (prior to facility admission) Massachusetts Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form were honored per the Resident's wishes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled MOLST Form, dated 5/1/15, indicated the following: -The MOLST form is a medical order form that converts an individual's wishes regarding life-sustaining treatment into Medical Orders. -A legally recognized health care agent (HCA) or guardian may execute, revise, or revoke the MOLST form for a resident only if the resident lacks decision-making capacity. -For a resident admitted with a MOLST form already completed check to make sure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff notified the provider as ordered when test results were outside of the parameters set by the provider, for one Resident (#75), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the provider when Resident #75's blood sugar reading was greater than 400. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Policy, dated 2/2023, included: -It is the policy of the (facility), except in medical emergencies, to notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's condition and/or status. -Nursing services will notify the resident's attending physician when it is deemed necessary or appropriate in the best interest of the resident. Review of the facility's policy titled Nursing Care of the Resident with Diabetes Mellitus, undated, indicated that the physician will order the frequency of glucose (blood sugar) monitoring. Resident #75 was admitted to the facility in November 2021 with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes (DM II -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the required transfer documentation was completed and communicated the appropriate information to the receiving health care institution for one Resident (#50), out of a total sample of 25 residents, putting the Resident at risk for complications and adverse events upon transfer to the receiving facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Transfer and Discharge Policies and Procedures, dated 2/2023, indicated the following: -All documentation concerning the transfer or discharge of a resident must be recorded in the resident's medical record. -Should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital .the facility will implement the following procedures: . -Notify the receiving facility or unit that the transfer is being made -Prepare the transfer form to send with the resident Resident #50 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses that included: spinal stenosis (abnormal narrowing of the spinal canal that results in pressure on the spinal cord or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Comprehensive Assessment for one Resident (#174), out of a total of 25 residents sampled. Specifically, for Resident #174, the facility failed to complete the admission Comprehensive Assessment no later than day 14 after the Resident was admitted to the facility to assist in planning and providing appropriate care to attain or maintain the highest practicable level of well-being. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual indicated for admission Comprehensive Assessments: -The ARD (Assessment Reference Date) (item A2300) must be sent no later than day 14, counting the date of admission as day 1. -Federal statute and regulations require that residents are assessed promptly upon admission (but no later than day 14) and the results are used in planning and providing appropriate care to attain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans according to Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment Care Area Assessments (CAAs) for three Residents (#53, #63, and #50), out of 25 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Develop a care plan for Resident #53 relative to rejection of care when behaviors for refusal of care were triggered on the Resident's MDS Assessment's CAA for Behavior, facility staff indicated a care plan for rejection of care was to be developed, and the Resident continued to reject care. 2. Develop a care plan for Resident #63 relative to vision when vision impairments were triggered on the Resident's MDS Assessment's CAA for Vision and facility staff indicated a care plan was to be developed. 3. Develop a care plan for Resident #50 relative to pain when pain was triggered on the Resident's MDS Assessment's CAA for Pain and facility staff indicated a care plan was to be developed. Findings include: Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan, in accordance with the facility's policy, for one Resident (#48), out of 25 total residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to revise Resident #48's comprehensive care plan following completion of a comprehensive assessment, which increased the Resident's risk for improper delivery of care related to changing goals, preferences, and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessment (MDS) and Care Planning Policies and Procedures, dated 2/2023, indicated that it was the policy of the facility that the care plan/interdisciplinary team develops a comprehensive care plan for each resident within 7 days of the completion of assessment and reviews are made at least every 92 days. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility in August 2018 with diagnoses including: persistent vegetative state (completely unresponsive to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for one Resident (#88) who was unable to carry out ADLs independently, out of a total of 25 residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #88 with grooming needs relative to facial hair and nail care. Findings include: Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in May 2021 with diagnoses of adult failure to thrive (a syndrome of global decline that occurs in older adults as a worsening of physical frailty that is frequently compounded by cognitive impairment) and unspecified dementia (a cognitive impairment that has yet to be diagnosed as a specific type). Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Support, effective 1/2023, indicated: -Task related to personal care such as personal hygiene, toileting, feeding, ambulating, bed mobility, transfer, walking, in room and in the corridor, locomotion on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for one Resident (#48) who required the use of Oxygen, out of 25 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain Resident #48's oxygen delivery equipment in a sanitary manner when: a. The concentrator's filter cover was covered with dust, while the Resident used Oxygen via a nasal cannula (plastic device inserted into one's nose to assist in delivering Oxygen) attached to the concentrator, increasing risk for sub-optimal air flow and compromised health. b. The top and front of the concentrator had areas of dust and dried, spattered debris while the Resident used Oxygen via nasal cannula which was attached to the concentrator, increasing risk for compromised health. Review of the facility's policy titled Suggested O2 (Oxygen) Equipment Cleaning Schedules, dated June 2022, indicated: - All equipment would be cleaned and stored according to infection control . guidelines. - Oxygen delivery…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and test tray results, the facility failed to serve palatable food, at an appetizing temperature, to all residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Serve palatable food, relative to texture, to residents on the East One Unit for one breakfast meal. 2. Serve food to residents on the [NAME] Two Unit that was palatable, relative to taste and texture, and hot when the food was meant to be served hot. Findings include: On 3/21/24 from 2:00 P.M. through 3:00 P.M., the surveyor conducted a Resident Council meeting. Residents in attendance stated that the food that was supposed to be served hot but it was served cold. The residents said the taste and texture of the food was undesirable. The residents also said cold food was brought up during monthly Resident Council meetings and during the Food Committee meetings. On 3/22/24, between 8:01 A.M. and 8:19 A.M., the surveyor observed the following on the East One Unit: - The second meal cart arrived on the Unit at 8:01 A.M. - The last resident meal tray was served at 8:19 A.M. and the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, policies, and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to infection control standards for residents on Transmission-based Precautions (TBP), to mitigate the spread of infection, for one Resident (#77), out of three applicable sampled residents, out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff wore the required personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care to a Resident on Droplet precautions (a precaution used to prevent the spread of pathogens that are passed through respiratory secretions such as when coughing or sneezing) for Influenza infection. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Influenza Prevention and Control, dated February 2022, indicated the following: -Use droplet precautions when caring for patients with suspected or confirmed seasonal influenza. -Signage from CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) on transmission-based precautions . are utilized by the facility to communicate the particular type of precautions needed. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff maintained wheelchair equipment in safe operating condition for one Resident (#67), out of a total of 25 sampled residents. Specifically, for Resident #67, the facility failed to identify that the left side panel was missing from the wheelchair creating a large gap on the left side of the wheelchair where the Resident's left arm could slip through and be caught in the wheel spoke. Findings include: Resident #67 was admitted to the facility in December 2018 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (when symptoms and findings of cognitive dysfunction do not meet the criteria for a specific type of dementia), weakness, and other lack of coordination. Review of the facility policy titled Seating System and Positioning Devices, effective 12/2023, indicated that . Seating systems may be routinely checked during rounds, mealtimes, quarterly/annual screening process . Review of the facility's policy titled Equipment Calibration/Maintenance - Guideline, effective 12/2023, included: -All…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed, interviews and observations, for one of three nursing units, (East 1 Unit) the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently adhered to infection control guidelines and Facility policies related to the prevention of contamination and spread of infection, specifically related to ensuring staff were wearing the required personal protective equipment (PPE) when interacting with COVID-19 positive residents, along with ensuring appropriate handling and disposal of contaminated linens and PPE. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated as effective February 2022, indicated the following: -Signage from the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) on transmission-based precautions and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) on special droplet/contact precautions, are utilized by the facility to communicate the particular type of precautions needed. -When transmission-based precautions are in place, an isolation cart with all the necessary personal protective equipment (PPE) and needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), who was re-admitted to the Facility with a pressure injury to his/her coccyx (lower back area) and was assessed by nursing as being at moderate risk for skin breakdown, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice related to the promotion of healing or the prevention of worsening of his/her wound, when the wound was not assessed on admission by nursing, treatment orders were not obtained from the physician until 10 days after admission, as well as there being no documentation of continued monitoring for the improvement or potential worsening of his/her pressure injury. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled Skin Assessment and Surveillance, dated as revised January 2023, indicated the following: -The nursing department will complete an admission Skin Assessment and a Norton Plus Risk Assessment for all residents upon admission to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-22 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff promptly acted upon and responded to concerns that were brought up during the scheduled Resident Council Meetings about life and resident care at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Council, revised 2/2021: indicated the purpose of the resident council was to provide a forum for residents, families, and resident representatives to have input in the operation of the facility. The policy also included the following: - discuss concerns and suggestions for improvement. - disseminate information and gather feedback from interested residents. - a Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. - The facility department related to any issues will be responsible for addressing the item(s) of concern. Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes, provided to the survey team with permission from the Council President indicated the following concerns were relayed during the recently held meetings: July 2022: -the food was bad,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. For Resident #70 the facility staff failed to ensure the Resident or the Resident's Representative was involved in developing the care plan and/or making decisions about his/her care. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility in April 2021. Review of the MDS dated [DATE], indicated a BIMS score of 15/15, indicating Resident #70 was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan calendar, provided by the facility staff indicated that the Resident was scheduled to have a care plan meeting on 11/11/22. Review of the Resident's clinical record indicated no evidence that the Resident or Resident's Representative had been invited, participated, or declined to attend a care plan meeting. During an interview on 11/15/22 at 2:49 P.M., Resident #70 said that he/she has never participated in a care plan meeting. He/she believed there was one recently, however said it never took place. During an interview on 11/16/22 at 4:07 P.M., Social Worker #1 said that there usually is a sign in sheet. She further said that she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided an environment free from accidents and hazards. Specifically, they failed to ensure: A) safety relative to smoking for two Residents (#62 and #70), out of a sample of 27 residents, and B) medications were safely stored on one out of three units observed. Findings include: 1. For Resident #70 the facility staff failed to ensure the environment remained free of accidental hazards relative to smoking. Review of the facility policy titled [NAME] Health and Rehab Smoking Policy, October 2018, indicated the following: -Residents are not permitted to retain smoking materials (i.e., cigarettes, cigars, lighters, matches etc.) -All resident smoking materials (as listed above) must be turned over at the time of admission and throughout the stay in the facility, to the nursing unit where they are logged in, labeled, and secured. Review of the smoking list provided by the facility staff indicated that Resident #70 was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided necessary care and services for the use of respiratory equipment for four Residents (#75, #47, #49 and #36), out of a sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility staff: 1) failed to obtain a Physician order for BiPAP therapy, sanitize and replace respiratory accessory equipment for Resident #75. 2) failed to obtain a Physician order for supplemental Oxygen for Resident #47. 3) failed to provide appropriate signage of Oxygen use and care of oxygen equipment to prevent the spread of infection for Resident # 49, and 4) failed to obtain a Physician order for Oxygen and apply CPAP as ordered for Resident #36. Findings include: 1. For Resident #75 the facility failed to ensure its staff obtained a Physician's order for his/her respiratory equipment, specifically a BiPAP device (bilevel positive airway pressure device - that provides non-invasive mechanical ventilation that uses pressure to push air into one's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained a complete and accurate medical record for ten Residents (#20, #47, #110, #11, #28, #35, #39, #92, #8 and #111), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Charting and Documentation dated 2017, indicated that all services provided to the resident, or any changes in the resident's medical or mental condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The policy also included the following: -all observations, medication administered, services performed, etc. must be documented in the resident's clinical record -all incidents, accidents, or changes in the resident's medical condition must be recorded During the entrance conference on [DATE] at 9:11 A.M., the Administer and Director of Nurses (DON) said there were no residents in the facility that were COVID-19 positive requiring Isolation/Droplet precautions. 1. For Resident #20, the facility failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1) ensure its staff followed the facility protocol relative to Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use. Specifically, the wearing of facemasks while on the resident care floors, and 2) implement their infection surveillance plan relative to COVID-19 screening, for five out of eight employees reviewed, in an effort to stop the spread of infection. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) Memorandum titled: Update to Caring for Long-Term Care Residents during the COVID-19 Response, including Visitation Conditions, Communal Dining, and Congregate Activities, dated 10/13/22, indicated the following: -Long-term care facilities should screen all individuals entering the facility for symptoms but may utilize posted signage as a means to do so. -Long term care facilities should have all individuals entering the facility, including healthcare personnel and visitors, self-assess for symptoms of COVID-19 (e.g., cough, shortness of breath, sore throat, runny nose, headache,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-22 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — patternPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#20 and #110), out of a total sample of three residents, had Physician Orders for COVID-19 testing. Findings include: 1. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in October 2022. Review of the Physician's Orders did not indicate any orders for facility staff to conduct COVID-19 testing. Review of the facility Testing Logs, provided by the Infection Preventionist (IP) indicated Resident #20 was tested for COVID-19 on 10/3/22, 10/5/22 and 10/7/22. 2. Resident #110 was admitted to the facility in October 2022. Review of the Physician's Orders did not indicate any orders to conduct COVID-19 testing. Review of the Facility Testing Logs, provided by the Infection Preventionist (IP), indicated Resident #110 was tested for COVID-19 on 10/5/22, 10/7/22, 10/10/22 and 10/15/22. During an interview on 11/17/22 at 2:46 P.M., the IP said that there should be Physician's Orders in all of the residents medical records to conduct COVID-19 testing.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided reasonable accommodation of needs for one Resident (#113), out of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility's staff failed to ensure that a call bell was within reach for the Resident's use. Findings include: Resident #113 was admitted to the facility October 2022, with the diagnosis of cerebral infarct (a disruption of blood flow to the brain) and left sided hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. Further review of the MDS assessment indicated the Resident was dependent on caregivers for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, hygiene, and bathing, and had impairment in range of motion (ROM) of the upper and lower extremities on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff notified the Physician about a change in one Resident (#47)'s medical condition, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Guidelines for Notifying Physician's of Clinical Problems, dated 2/2014, indicated the following relative to Immediate Notification (Acute) Problems: -The following symptoms, signs and laboratory values (which are not all-inclusive) should prompt immediate notification of the Physician, after an appropriate nursing evaluation. -Immediate implies that the Physician should be notified as soon as possible, either by phone, pager, text messaging, or other means. -These situations include: -Rapid decline or continued instability (for example, markedly fluctuating vital signs), unless the individual is receiving only Palliative Care (specialized medical care for a serious illness). -changes in vital signs, -Tachypnea (abnormally rapid breathing) and dyspnea (difficulty/labored breathing) with a pulse oximetry below 90%. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained resident privacy on one of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident specific medical information was kept private and confidential when other residents were present. Findings include: During the Resident Group Meeting on 11/16/22 from 1:30 P.M. to 3:30 P.M., one resident said during nursing change of shift, he/she could hear the medical information that was being reported about other residents because his/her room was adjacent to the nursing station. On 11/16/22 at 3:43 P.M. on the East Two Unit, the surveyor observed two residents seated in close proximity of the nurses' station. The Day Shift Nurse was observed to report medical information about a resident (who was referred to by name) to the Evening Shift Nurse who was standing at the medication cart. The Day Shift Nurse indicated that this specific resident needed a Renal Function Panel (series of blood tests which assessed kidney function) and once the results are received, they needed to be sent to the specified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided required discharge notices for two Residents (#111 and #36) and/or their representatives, out of 27 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #111 was admitted to the facility in September 2022. Review of the Resident's medical record indicated he/she was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. Further review of the Resident's medical record did not indicate a Notice of Discharge was provided to the Resident and/or his/her Representative. During an interview on 11/17/22 at 9:45 A.M., the Social Worker (SW) said when a resident has a facility-initiated discharge, the Resident, their Representative (if applicable) and the State Ombudsman should receive a 30-day notice of intent to discharge and there was no evidence this occurred. 2. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in July 2021. Review of the nursing progress note dated 3/29/22 indicated the Resident was sent from the facility to the hospital. Review of the nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided Notices of Bed Hold Policy and Return for two Residents (#111 and #36), out of 27 sampled residents as required by facility policy. Review of the facility policy titled, Bed Holds and Returns, revised May 2022, included the following: - Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, Residents or Resident Representatives will be informed in writing of the Bed Hold and Return policy. - Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the Residents and the Resident Representatives that explains in detail: -the rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed holds, -the reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan (Medicaid residents), -the facility per diem rate required to hold a bed (non-Medicaid residents), -or to hold a bed beyond the state bed hold period (Medicaid residents), -and the details of the transfer. Findings include: 1. Resident #111 was admitted to the facility in September 2022. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure its staff accurately completed comprehensive assessments for two Residents (#50 and #78), out of 27 sampled residents, that included cognitive, mood, and behaviors patterns. Findings include: Review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual dated October 2019, indicated the following in part: -SECTION C: COGNITIVE PATTERNS - Code 0, No: if the interview should not be conducted because the resident is rarely/never understood; cannot respond verbally, in writing, or using another method; or an interpreter is needed but not available. -Code 1, Yes: if the interview should be conducted because the resident is at least sometimes understood verbally, in writing, or using another method, and if an interpreter is needed, and one is available. -SECTION D: MOOD - Code 0, No: if the interview should not be conducted because the resident is rarely/never understood or cannot respond verbally, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure its staff developed and implemented the plan of care for three Residents (#12, #53 and #50), out of 27 sampled Residents. Specifically, 1)the facility staff failed to provide compression ace wraps and/or TED stockings (stockings that promote increased blood flow in the legs and reduce the risk of blood clots) for one Resident (#12), 2) failed to arrange surgical follow-up for tracheostomy closure for one Resident (#53), and 3) failed to assess elopement risk for one Resident (#50). Finding include: 1. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility November 2021 with weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. Further review of the MDS assessment indicated: -he/she did not reject care, -and he/she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications in a way that met professional standards of practices for one Resident (#39), out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, the Nurse failed to provide crushed medication in a way to ensure the Resident consumed all the medication. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Preparation and General Guidelines, effective date January 1, 2021 indicated the following: -Tablet Crushing/Capsule Opening: Crushing tablets .For medications crushed for oral administration and placed in food, the entire content of the food must be consumed to assure the entire dose of medication has been consumed also . Resident #39 was admitted to the facility in October 2020 with a diagnosis of unspecified Dementia with behavioral disturbance. During an observation on 11/15/22 at 8:17 A.M., the surveyor observed the Resident sleeping in bed. He/she had a breakfast tray in front of him/her on a bedside table including a covered bowl of oatmeal. Nurse #1 proceeded to take the bowl of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided assistance with grooming and personal hygiene for three Residents (#31, #70, and #373), out of 27 sampled Residents. Specifically, 1) failing to provide nail care for Resident #31, and 2) showers for Resident's #70 and #373. 1. For Resident #31 the facility failed to ensure its staff assisted with his/her fingernail care. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility in September 2022. Review of the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/4/22 indicated the Resident's cognition was moderately impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 15. Further review of the MDS Assessment indicated the Resident required the extensive assistance of one person with his/her personal hygiene. Review of the Resident's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan, initiated on 10/10/22 indicated the following: - The Resident has an ADL self-care deficit related to activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided the appropriate care and services related to a urinary catheter (also referred to as a Foley - a tube placed into the bladder to drain urine) for one Resident (#111), out of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, 1) staff failed to ensure appropriate Physician orders were in place, and 2) failed to appropriately maintain the urinary catheter to prevent contamination and infection. Findings include: Resident #111 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses including Sepsis (the body's extreme response to an infection which is a life threatening emergency), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- an enlarged prostate gland). Review of the facility policy titled: Foley Catheter Insertion revised October 2010, included the following: - Verify there is a Physician's order - The following documentation should be recorded in the Resident's medical record: -the size of the Foley catheter inserted -and the amount of fluid used to inflate the balloon (located behind the tubing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided appropriate care and services for one Resident (#113,) with a Gastrostomy tube (G-tube: a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medication), out of 28 sampled Residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to provide care of the G-tube site. Findings include: Resident #113 was admitted to the facility October 2022 with the diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a feeding tube. Review of the policy titled Enteral Nutrition dated May 2022, indicated the following: Staff caring for residents with feeding tubes are trained on how to recognize and report complications associated with the insertion and/or use of a feeding tube such as skin breakdown around the insertion site. Review of the policy titled Charting and Documentation dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility and its staff failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis (a blood purifying treatment given when kidney function is not optimum) received care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#11), out of a sample of 27 residents. Specifically, failure to ensure: A) development of a baseline care plan that included Physician orders relative to dialysis, and B) complete and accurate documentation/communication with the dialysis facility. Findings include: Review of the 2017 facility policy titled End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Care of a Resident with, included the following: -The type of assessment data that is to be gathered about the resident's condition on a daily or per shift basis includes: timing and administration of medications, particularly those before and after dialysis and the care of grafts and fistulas. -Agreement between facility and contracted dialysis facility include all aspects of how the resident's care will be managed including .how information will be exchanged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure its staff assisted in acquiring dental services for one Resident (#35), out of a total of 27 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dental Services, revised 5/22 indicated the following: -Routine and 24-hour emergency dental services are provided to our residents through: -a referral to the resident's personal dentist .community dentist .to other health care organizations that provide dental services. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in March 2021. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #35 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating he/she was cognitively intact. During an interview on 11/15/22 at 8:40 A.M., Resident #35 said he/she had a filling that had come out a while ago and thought he/she had asked staff to see the Dentist, but he/she had not seen a Dentist. Review of the nursing progress note dated 8/3/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility administrator failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee was composed of the required members. Specifically, there was no evidence the Medical Director or his/her designee had attended two quarely meetings, 1/31/22 and 7/21/22 out of four quarterly QAPI meetings. Review of the facility QAPI plan dated September 2022, indicated the committee consisted of the Medical Director, Administrator, Director of Nursing, QAPI/Compliance Director, department managers, and nursing assistants. Review of the attendance sheet for the quarterly QAPI meeting held on 1/31/22 showed there was no evidence the Medical Director or his/her designee participated in the meeting. Review of the attendance sheet for the quarterly QAPI meeting held on 7/21/22 showed there was no evidence the Medical Director or his/her designee participated in the meeting. During an interview on 11/22/22 at 9:34 A.M. the Administrator reviewed the attendance sheets with the surveyor and said there was no evidence the Medical Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident and/or Resident Representative was notified in writing of a transfer or discharge and that a representative in the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman was also notified for four Residents (#87, #76, #48, and #121), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #87, that the Resident and/or Resident Representative was notified in writing, and the reason given for a transfer or discharge; 2. For Resident #76, that the Resident and/or Resident Representative was notified in writing, and the reason given for a transfer or discharge, and that the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman was notified of the transfer/discharge; 3. For Resident #48, that the Resident and/or Resident Representative was notified in writing, and the reason given for a transfer or discharge, and that the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman was notified of the transfer/discharge;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Notice of Bed-Hold Policy at the time of transfer to a hospital or shortly thereafter for three Residents (#87, #76, and #48), who were expected to return to the facility, and/or their Representatives, out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Transfer and Discharge Policies and Procedures, dated 2/2023, included: -Should a resident be transferred or discharged from our facility with the intent of returning, the resident's bed will be held upon request of the resident and/or the resident's representative. -It is the policy of (the facility) to give the resident and/or responsible person a written notice that specifies our bed-hold policy at the time of transfer or discharge. 1. Resident #87 was admitted to the facility in March 2021 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (CVA - a disruption in the blood flow to the brain), adult failure to thrive (a syndrome of global decline that occurs in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses including neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (a condition in people who lack bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or nerve problem) and artificial openings of urinary tract status. Review of the Physician's Orders, dated 3/23/24, indicated the following: -Urostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an artificial opening for the urinary system) care every shift, date initiated, 11/22/23. -Inspect the condition of the skin around the urostomy stoma (a surgically created artificial opening) for any irritation or breakdown every shift, if present, notify the supervisor and Physician immediately, date initiated 11/22/23. Review of the MDS assessments, dated 12/5/23 and 2/28/24, under Section H- Bladder and Bowel, did not indicate the Resident had an urostomy. During an interview on 3/22/24 at 2:34 P.M., the MDS Nurse said the presence of an ostomy should have been coded on the MDS assessments, dated 12/5/23 and 2/28/24, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUZZUPOLI FAMILY 2011 IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 95% | since 02/01/2023 |
| CUZZUPOLI, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 5% | since 02/01/2023 |
| FRAIOLI, PATRICK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| KOPPENHEFFER, ALEX | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| WHEELER, SCOTT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225757. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.