No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Country Gardens Health and Rehabilitation

2045 Grand Army Highway, Swansea, MA 02777 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 86 certified beds · (508) 379-9700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (508) 379-9700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0741, F0758)$24,635 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $24,635 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-01)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2340 Grand Army of the Republic Hwy · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2340 Grand Army of the Republic Hwy · (508) 379-9080 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2685 Gar Hwy · (508) 379-6072 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
21 Baptist St · (508) 379-9728

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.0%16.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms43.9%15.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.5%15.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.2%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.2%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.8%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.6%21.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.7%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine61.7%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.8%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.4%11.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.901.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.201.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
32.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 32.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.8%CMS range 38.1–56.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 6.3–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge32.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge24.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge32.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 3.6–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 71.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-23)
31
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

58 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had an activated Health Care Proxy (HCP), the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff notified his/her Health Care Agent (HCA), that he/she had changes in his/her condition which also included the need for new Physician's orders.Findings include:Review of the Facility's Policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated May 2023, indicated the following:-our facility shall promptly notify the resident's representative of change in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status.-the nurse will record in the resident's medical record information relative to changes in the resident's medical/mental condition or status.During an interview on 09/09/25 at 10:42 A.M., Family Member #1 (who was Resident #1's HCA) said Resident #1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], after a hospitalization. Family Member #1 said she called the facility on 07/04/25 to see how Resident #1 was doing and said she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), whose hospital discharge summary indicated he/she required an altered textured diet (dysphagia diet), the Facility failed to ensure meals prepared and served to him/her met his/her individual need, when his/her new diet orders were not transcribed by nursing, and he/she received the incorrect diet for two days. Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy tilted Therapeutic Diet Orders Policy, dated as reviewed/revised March 2025, indicated the following: -the facility provides all residents with foods in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician.-a Mechanically Altered Diet is one in which the texture or consistency of food is altered to facilitate oral intake.-all diet orders are to be communicated to the dietary department in accordance with facility procedures.-dietary and nursing staff are responsible for providing therapeutic diets in the appropriate form and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), who had new diet order instructions, the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record, when nursing staff failed to transcribe his/her new diet order onto Resident #1's Physician orders.Findings Include:Review of the Facility's Policy titled Charting and Documentation, dated May 2023, indicated the following:-all services provided to the resident to the resident, or any changes in the resident's medical or mental condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record.-documentation in the medical record will be complete and accurate.Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in January 2024, diagnoses included Dementia, bipolar disorder, type II diabetes mellitus, Parkinson's disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol).Review of Resident #1's Hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #1's discharge diet instructions were for a Dysphagia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-23 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit direct care staffing data to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the entire reporting period, Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 -March 31) in accordance with the schedule specified by CMS. Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Report, CASPER Report 1705D, FY Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 - March 31), indicated the facility triggered for: -Failed to Submit Data for the Quarter (No Data Submitted for Quarter) -One Star Staffing Rating (Staff Staffing Rating Equals 1) During an interview on 6/18/25 at 9:37 A.M., the Director of Operations said the company had a change in the corporate Human resource position at the time of PBJ submission for Quarter 2 and they were unaware that the submission had not taken place. He said he attempted to reach out to CMS so they could submit the data after the fact but was informed that wouldn't be possible. He said the PBJ information should have been submitted as required and was not.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, last revised August 2024, indicated but was not limited to: -Staff shall follow established facility infection control procedures for the administration of medications. On 6/16/25 at 8:25 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #4 prepare 10 medications for Resident #8. Nurse #4 dropped one pill on to the top of the medication cart, picked up the pill, placed it into the medication cup and administered it to Resident #8. During an interview on 6/16/25 at 8:43 A.M., Nurse #4 said she had cleaned the top the of the medication cart at the beginning of her shift at 7:00 A.M. and the pill had not fallen on the floor but on top of the medication cart. During an interview on 6/16/25 at 4:25 P.M., the Director of Nursing said Nurse #2 should not have administered the medication after it fell on top of the medication cart. The Director of Nursing said the top of the medication is not considered a clean surface and if a medication falls on top of the medication cart it should be disposed of and a new pill should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    4. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including migraine (a neurological condition that can cause severe throbbing pain or a pulsing sensation, usually on one side of the head, accompanied by nausea, vomiting, and extreme sensitivity to light and sound) and restless leg syndrome (a neurological disorder characterized by an irresistible urge to move the legs, often accompanied by uncomfortable sensations). Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, last revised August 2024, indicated but was not limited to: -The individual administering the medication must initial the resident's Electronic Medical Administration Record (EMAR) in the appropriate field after giving each medication and before administering the next ones. -As required or indicated for a medication, the individual administering the medication will record in the resident's electronic medical record: -the date and time the medication was administered. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, undated, indicated but was not limited to: -When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee developed, implemented and maintained a comprehensive QAPI program with projects that were data driven and had metrics that benchmarked their current status, established goals and defined measurements for improvement for outcomes that were sustainable. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program, last dated, January 2025, included but was not limited to the following: - Our QAPI program will be ongoing and comprehensive and includes all employees, all departments, and all services provided. - QAPI will utilize best available evidence (data, benchmarks, published best practice, clinical guidelines) to define and measure goals. - Data to be monitored includes, but is not limited to: quality measures, previous survey deficiencies, complaints or facility monitored incidents, ombudsman concerns, resident/family input - grievance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-23 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the new hire employee records contained evidence of the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccination for four of five newly hired employees. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the employee record contained evidence of the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccination or proof the newly hired employees were offered an updated COVID-19 vaccine when he/she was eligible. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, Staying up to date with COVID-19 vaccinations, dated as revised June 6, 2025, indicated but was not limited to the following: - CDC recommends a 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine for most adults ages 18 years and older. This includes people who have received a COVID-19 vaccine, people who have had COVID-19, and people with long COVID. Importance of staying up to date: - Getting the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine is important because protection from the COVID-19 vaccine decreases with time; Immunity after COVID-19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#168), out of a total sample of 17 residents, was treated with respect and dignity. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #168's Foley catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) drainage bag was consistently covered with a privacy shield and/or positioned away from the doorway. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, last revised March 2025, indicated but was not limited to: -It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. -All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident's rights. -Maintain resident privacy. Resident #168 was admitted to the facility in May 2025 and had diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of resident information was maintained on one of two nursing units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents' private health information and Activity of Daily Living (ADL) schedule was secure and not accessible to be viewed by anyone walking by the East unit nurses' station. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, last revised March 2025, indicated but was not limited to: - Maintain resident privacy - Random observations and/or verifications are conducted by the Director of Nurses or designee to ensure compliance On 6/20/25 at 10:22 A.M., the surveyor observed a multi-page resident information flip chart open on top of the East unit desk, standing up and facing outward towards the hallways. The information that was available for review to people walking by included: four resident's names who were to be gotten up on the 11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. shift and the opposite page included a list for showers and skin checks.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 48 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents/resident representatives had the right to voice and formulate grievances, have those grievances responded to promptly, and be provided a resolution to their grievance for one Resident (#51), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff followed their policy and procedure when Resident #51's Health Care Proxy (HCP- healthcare agent designated by the resident when competent who has the authority to consent for health care decisions when a resident has been declared, by a physician, not to be competent to make his/her own health care decisions) notified staff that the Resident's denture (partial plate) was missing. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Complaint/Grievance Policy and Procedure, dated September 2023, indicated but was not limited to: Policy: -All residents and their responsible representative will have a mechanism to voice grievances and complaints to the Grievance Official in order to facilitate communication and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff developed and provided the resident with a summary of the baseline or comprehensive care plan within 48 hours of admission, which included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care to the resident which meet professional standards of quality care for one Resident (#168), of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and a summary provided to the Resident for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Baseline Care Plan, last revised May 2025, indicated but was not limited to: -The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. -The baseline care plan will: a. Be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. b. Include the minimum healthcare information necessary to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and individualize comprehensive care plans for one Resident (#168), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address the Resident's indwelling catheter. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, revised May 2025, included but was not limited to: -It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with residents' rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and ALL services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality. -The comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. All Care Assessment Areas (CAAs) triggered by the MDS will be considered in developing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#21), out of a total sample of 17 residents, received the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure ulcers. Specifically, the facility failed to reposition Resident #21 when he/she was identified to be a very high risk of developing a pressure area resulting in the development of a deep tissue injury (intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft tissue resulting from intense and/or prolonged pressure) to his/her left heel. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Skin Integrity Management, undated, indicated but was not limited to: -Residents with pressure ulcer risk factors are identified, assessed, and provided treatment according to standards of practice. -Residents with actual skin breakdown are identified, assessed and provided treatment according…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided residents with an environment free from accidents and hazards. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were disposed of on the [NAME] Unit in a secure manner to prevent access to those medications on one of two nursing units. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Destruction of Unused Drugs, last revised [DATE], indicated but was not limited to: -All unused, contaminated, or expired prescription and non-prescription drugs shall be disposed of per facility policy. -Drugs will be destroyed in a manner that renders the drugs unfit for human consumption and disposed of in compliance with all current and applicable state and federal requirements. Review of the facility Matrix (used to identify pertinent care categories for residents) provided to surveyors by the Director of Nursing on [DATE] indicated the [NAME] Unit had 37 out of 39 residents with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease/Dementia. On [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when two out of three nurses observed during a medication pass made three errors out of 28 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 10.71%. Those errors impacted two Residents (#11 and #18), out of four residents observed. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescribers. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, last revised August 2024, indicated but was not limited to: - Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. - Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders. 1. For Resident #18, Nurse #4 administered: - the incorrect formula of a probiotic (live…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was alert and oriented and required substantial assistance from staff members when bathing, the Facility failed to ensure that staff treated him/her is a dignified and respectful manner, when related to his/her right to personal privacy when, on 4/03/25 while assisting him/her in the shower, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 conducted a telephone call using Face Time. Findings include: Review of the Facility Personal Cell Phone Policy, dated as reviewed/revised during January 2025, indicated the Facility prohibited employees from using personal cell phones for any reason on the nursing units. Review of the Facility Resident Rights Policy, dated as reviewed/revised during October 2024, indicated the resident had the right to personal privacy. Review of Resident #1's medical record indicated that he/she was admitted to the Facility during January 2025 and his/her diagnoses included multiple sclerosis. Resident #1's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 4/05/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-01 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of the Activity Director's (AD) personnel file, the facility failed to ensure the activity program was directed by a qualified activities professional. Findings include: During an interview on 6/25/24 at 11:13 A.M., the Activity Director (AD) said she used to be the First [NAME] at the facility and picked up hours every other week as an Activity Assistant for a while. She said she was hired as the AD for the facility in July 2023 when the former AD left. She said a few weeks after she started her position as AD, she had to take a leave of absence, and June 2024 is her first full month back to work. Review of the AD's personnel file on 6/25/24 failed to indicate she was qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who had two years of experience in a social or recreational program within the last five years, one of which was full-time in a therapeutic activities program, or was a qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant. During an interview with the AD and Regional Activity Director on 6/27/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to follow their policy and professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to properly label and date food products and maintain safe and clean equipment in two of two nourishment kitchenettes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food: Safe Handling for Foods from Visitors, revised 2/2023, indicated but was not limited to: - Residents will be assisted in properly storing and safely consuming food brought into the facility for residents by visitors. - Refrigerator/freezers for storage of foods brought in by visitors will be properly maintained and cleaned weekly. Review of the facility's policy, untitled and undated, indicated but was not limited to: - The foodservice department will check for expired products within the inventory. Discard all expired products. If products such as milk will expire before the next visit, discard to prevent negative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-01 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, policy review, and document review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee which included the required members at their meetings. Specifically, the facility Infection Preventionist failed to attend the last two quarterly QAPI meetings. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), dated as revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: - The QAPI program includes the establishment of a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee and a written QAPI Plan. - The QAA Committee shall be interdisciplinary and shall consist at a minimum of the Director of Nursing Services, the Medical Director or his/her designee, at least three other members of the facility's staff, at least one of which must be the Administrator, Owner, a Board Member or other Individual in a leadership role; and the Infection Preventionist. Review of the QAPI Attendance Sheets, dated 1/19/24, 2/26/24, 3/15/24, and 4/26/24, failed to indicate the Infection Preventionist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a resident group meeting, staff interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure grievances and concerns from the Resident Council were documented to ensure they were acted upon timely and included the facility response and rationale for response. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Council, dated 3/2/24, indicated but was not limited to: -The Activity Director shall be designated, if approved by the group, to serve as a liaison between the group and the facility's administration and any other staff members. -The group may appoint a resident to take notes/maintain meeting minutes, or may elect that the Activity Director/designated liaison to take notes/maintain minutes. -The facility shall act upon concerns and recommendations of the Council, make attempts to accommodate recommendations to the extent practicable, and communicate its decisions to the Council. Review of the Resident Council Minutes, dated 3/21/24, indicated eight residents participated in the meeting, and brought forward the following grievance: -One resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of resident records were maintained. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents' private health information was securely stored and not accessible in the facility's copy room and Staff Development Coordinator's (SDC) office, which were located on the main hallway on the first floor of the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Safeguarding of Resident Identifiable Information, last revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Policy: It is the facility's policy to implement reasonable and appropriate measures to protect and maintain the safety and confidentiality of the resident's identifiable information and to safeguard against destruction or unauthorized release of information and records. -Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility may not release information that is resident-identifiable to the public. 4. Medical records shall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, for nine Residents (#55, #231, #48, #78, #74, #20, #72, #30 and #47), out of 19 sampled residents, the facility failed to develop and/or implement comprehensive care plans to reflect the individual needs of the residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #55, a. to implement a care plan for an indwelling Foley catheter (tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder), and b. to develop and implement a care plan for psychotropic medications; 2. For Resident #231, to develop and implement a care plan for an anticoagulant (blood thinning) medication; 3. For Resident #48, to implement a care plan for an anticoagulant medication; 4. For Resident #78, to implement a care plan for antidepressant medication; 5. For Resident #74, to develop a comprehensive care plan for the Resident's diagnosis of endocarditis (infection of the heart's inner lining, usually involving the heart valves), presence of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC: a thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 4/19/24, indicated Resident #20 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a BIMS score of 9 out of 15, was diabetic, required a therapeutic diet and received insulin injections. a. Review of Physician's Orders included, but was not limited to: - Glipizide ER 2.5 milligrams (mg) (insulin), give one tablet one time a day for type 2 diabetes mellitus (4/16/24) - Metformin HCI 500 mg (insulin), give one tablet two times a day for type 2 diabetes mellitus (4/16/24) - Ozempic Subcutaneous Solution Pen Injector 4mg/3mL (injectable treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus similar to insulin), inject 1 mg subcutaneously (under the skin) one time a day for type 2 diabetes mellitus (4/16/24) - Humalog Injection Solution 100 unit/milliliters (mL) (insulin), inject per sliding scale for type 2 diabetes mellitus (4/16/24) - blood sugar levels less than 70 or greater than 300, call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided a meaningful and engaging activity program for residents on one Unit (West Unit), out of two units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented facility sponsored group activities for all residents on the [NAME] Unit. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Activities, last revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Activities will encourage both independence and interaction within the community. -Activities will be conducted in different ways: a. One-to-One Programs. b. Person Appropriate-activities relevant to the specific needs, interests, culture, background, etc. for the resident they are developed for. c. Program of Activities-to include a combination of large and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff possessed the appropriate competency and skills to care for one Resident (#74), who required intravenous (IV) administration of antibiotics through a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that nine Nursing staff (#1, #3, #5, #8, #10, #12, #13, Unit Manager #1, and the Director of Nursing ) had demonstrated necessary competencies to care for residents in the facility with specialized needs, inclusive of IV/PICC line care and treatment. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Competency Evaluation, last revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: - Competency is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully. - Evaluating competency of staff is accomplished through the facility's training program. - Initial competency is evaluated during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor adverse consequences (side effects) of anticoagulant medications (used to prevent the blood from clotting, a blood thinner) and anti-hypoglycemic medications (used to lower blood sugar) prescribed for three Residents (#231, #48, and #10), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Residents #231 and #48, to monitor for side effects of anticoagulant medication; and 2. For Resident #10, to monitor for side effects of hypoglycemic medications. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled High Risk, dated 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Policy: This facility recognizes that some medications, including anticoagulants, are associated with greater risks of adverse consequences than other medications. This policy addresses the facility's collaborative, systemic approach to managing anticoagulant therapy for efficacy and safety. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: - The resident's plan of care shall alert staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for five Residents (#55, #78, #30, #32, and #10), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were monitored for adverse consequences (side effects) of their use. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Use of Psychotropic Medication, dated 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: - Policy: Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication(s). Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: - The resident's response to the medication(s), including progress towards goals and presence/absence of adverse consequences, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. 1. Resident #55 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored all drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles prior to administration and in 1 of 4 medication carts and 1 of 2 medication rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: - For Resident #74, Intravenous (IV) medication was stored in the medication cart and not left at the bedside; - Schedule II-V controlled substance medications were maintained in a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment; - Loose pills were properly discarded; and - A multi-dose vial of Tuberculin (used to perform a skin test to diagnose Tuberculosis) which had been opened/accessed was dated and discarded within 30 days. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage, dated 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: - It is the policy of the facility to ensure all medications housed on the premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations; -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with professional standards and practices for five Residents (#74, #20, #6, #231, and #48), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #74, to accurately document the recommendations from the consultant infectious disease Physician regarding the plan of care for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC); 2. For Resident #20, to ensure his/her electronic medical record contained scanned documents pertaining only to Resident #20; and 3. For Residents #6, #231, and #48, to document weekly comprehensive skin assessment per physician orders. Findings include: Review of the facility's Confidentiality of Personal and Medical Records policy and Safeguarding of Resident Identifiable Information, both dated 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: - This facility honors the resident's right to secure and confidential personal and medical records. This includes the right to confidentiality of all information contained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections for five Residents (#72, #74, #17, #6, and #55) of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #72, ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) as required for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes) and Contact Precautions (infection control precautions used for patients who may be infected with certain infectious agents for which additional precautions are needed to prevent infection transmission); 2. For Resident #74, ensure staff wore PPE as required for EBP while providing care to a resident with a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC); 3. For Resident #17, ensure staff wore PPE while in contact with the Resident's blood; 4. For Resident #6, ensure staff wore the appropriate PPE as required for EBP while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-01 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff. Specifically, for eight direct care staff (Nurse #1, Nurse #9, Nurse #8, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, CNA #7, CNA #4, CNA #11, and CNA #10), out of eight direct care staff education records reviewed, the facility failed to provide all of the required training necessary to meet the needs of each resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Training Requirements, dated as revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: -Training requirements should be met prior to staff and volunteers independently providing services to residents, annually, and as necessary based on the facility assessment. -Training content includes, at a minimum: a. Effective communication for direct care staff b. Resident rights and facility responsibilities for caring for residents c. Elements and goals of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program d. Written standards, policies, and procedures for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-01 · tag F0941 — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and staff education records reviewed for five direct care staff employees (Nurse #1, Nurse #9, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) #4, CNA #11, and CNA #10) of eight employees reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that training on effective communications was included as mandatory training for direct care staff. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Training Requirements, dated as revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: -Training requirements should be met prior to staff and volunteers independently providing services to residents, annually, and as necessary based on the facility assessment. -Training content includes, at a minimum: a. Effective communication for direct care staff -The Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) maintains a training schedule and documentation system for completed training by all staff, contracted staff, and volunteers. The facility was unable to provide the surveyor with an education folder/packet for Nurses #1 and #9. Review of the staff education records for CNAs #4, #11, and #10 failed to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-01 · tag F0942 — pattern
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and staff education records reviewed for five direct care staff employees (Nurse #1, Nurse #9, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4, CNA #11, and CNA #10) of eight employees reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that training on resident rights was included as mandatory training for direct care staff. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Training Requirements, dated as revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: -Training requirements should be met prior to staff and volunteers independently providing services to residents, annually, and as necessary based on the facility assessment. -Training content includes, at a minimum: b. Resident rights and facility responsibilities for caring for residents -The Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) maintains a training schedule and documentation system for completed training by all staff, contracted staff, and volunteers. The facility was unable to provide the surveyor with an education folder/packet for Nurses #1 and #9. Review of the staff education records for CNAs #4, #11, and #10 failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-01 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and staff education records reviewed for five direct care staff employees (Nurse #1, Nurse #9, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4, CNA #11, and CNA #10) of eight employees reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that training on elements and goals of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program was included as mandatory training for direct care staff. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Training Requirements, dated as revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: -Training requirements should be met prior to staff and volunteers independently providing services to residents, annually, and as necessary based on the facility assessment. -Training content includes, at a minimum: c. Elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program -The Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) maintains a training schedule and documentation system for completed training by all staff, contracted staff, and volunteers. The facility was unable to provide the surveyor with an education folder/packet for Nurses #1 and #9. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-01 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — pattern
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and staff education records reviewed for four direct care staff employees (Nurse #1, Nurse #9, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #7, and CNA #10) of eight employees reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that training on written standards, policies and procedures for the facility's infection prevention and control program was included as mandatory training for direct care staff. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Training Requirements, dated as revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: -Training requirements should be met prior to staff and volunteers independently providing services to residents, annually, and as necessary based on the facility assessment. -Training content includes, at a minimum: d. Written standards, policies and procedures for the facility's infection prevention and control program -The Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) maintains a training schedule and documentation system for completed training by all staff, contracted staff, and volunteers The facility was unable to provide the surveyor with an education…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-01 · tag F0946 — pattern
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and staff education records reviewed for eight direct care staff employees (Nurse #8, Nurse #1, Nurse #9, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, CNA #7, CNA #4, CNA # 11, and CNA #10) of eight employees reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that training on written standards, policies, and procedures for the facility's compliance and ethics program was included as mandatory training for direct care staff. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Training Requirements, dated as revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: -Training requirements should be met prior to staff and volunteers independently providing services to residents, annually, and as necessary based on the facility assessment. -Training content includes, at a minimum: e. Written standards, policies, and procedures for the facility's compliance and ethics program -The Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) maintains a training schedule and documentation system for completed training by all staff, contracted staff, and volunteers During survey the facility was unable to provide an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-01 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and staff education records reviewed for eight direct care staff employees (Nurse #8, Nurse #1, Nurse #9, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, CNA #7, CNA #4, CNA # 11, and CNA #10) of eight employees reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that training on behavioral health was included as mandatory training for direct care staff. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Training Requirements, dated as revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: -Training requirements should be met prior to staff and volunteers independently providing services to residents, annually, and as necessary based on the facility assessment. -Training content includes, at a minimum: f. Behavioral health -The Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) maintains a training schedule and documentation system for completed training by all staff, contracted staff, and volunteers. The facility was unable to provide the surveyor with an education folder/packet for Nurses #1 and #9. Review of the staff education records for Nurse #8, CNA #1, CNA #7, CNA #4, CNA # 11, and CNA #10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Physician/Practitioner was notified of a change in treatment for one Resident (#44), out of a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Physician/Practitioner was notified when a prescribed anticoagulant (blood thinner) was not available from the pharmacy and administered as ordered. Findings include: Resident #44 was originally admitted to the facility in June 2022 and had diagnoses including dementia. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #44 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] after sustaining a right hip fracture following a fall. The hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated Resident #44 underwent an open reduction internal fixation (surgery to re-align and stabilize serious fractures) on 8/15/24. The summary and discharge medications indicated the Resident was to receive enoxaparin (anticoagulant) 40 milligrams/0.4 mL injection every 24 hours starting on 8/19/24 for Deep Vein…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff developed a baseline or comprehensive care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission, which included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for two Residents (#20 and #74), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #20, to develop a baseline care plan for the Resident's diagnosis of diabetes mellitus; and 2. For Resident #74, to develop a baseline care plan for the Resident's diagnosis of endocarditis (infection of the heart's inner lining, usually involving the heart valves), presence of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC: a thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm then guided (threaded) into a large vein above the right side of the heart called the superior vena cava), and administration of intravenous antibiotic therapy. Findings include: Review of the facility's Baseline Care Plan policy, last revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: -The facility will develop and implement a baseline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document the recapitulation (a summary) of the Resident's stay from the facility for one Resident (#80), out of two closed records reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Transfer Discharge (including AMA), last Reviewed/Revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: Policy: Anticipated Transfers or Discharges - resident-initiated discharges. - A member of the interdisciplinary team completes relevant sections of the Discharge Summary. The nurse caring for the resident at the time of discharge is responsible for ensuring the Discharge Summary is complete and includes, but not limited to the following: - i. A recap of the resident's stay that includes diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology and consultation results. - ii. A final summary of the residents' status. - iii. Reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications (both prescribed and over the counter). - iv. A post discharge plan of care that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to promote and manage the delivery of safe nursing care in accordance with accepted Standards of Nursing Practice for one Resident (#32), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not move a resident off the floor after the Resident sustained an unwitnessed fall with a head strike, prior to having a nurse assess the Resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's Fall Reduction policy, last reviewed 6/22/22, included but was not limited to: In the event a resident falls, the following measures will be instituted: -Conduct a physical assessment to determine if there are any injuries. Notify the nursing supervisor/Director of Nursing Services immediately. Administer appropriate first aid. -If the resident fall was unwitnessed or if a head injury is suspected, monitor neurological signs. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including dementia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and unsteadiness on his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the proper care and treatment of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line device (inserted into a vein in the upper arm and is advanced until the internal tip of the catheter is in the superior vena cava to deliver medications and other treatments directly to the large central veins near your heart) was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#74), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -nursing staff measured the external length of the PICC line catheter as ordered by the Physician to ensure the catheter had not migrated (moved) out of place, and -the insertion site was visible for routine assessment by the licensed nurses. Findings include: Review of the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter/Midline/Central Venous Access Device (CVAD) Dressing Change policy and Documentation Guidelines, last revised 3/4/24, included but was not limited to: -It is the policy of this facility to change PICC, midline or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain respiratory equipment according to professional standards of practice for one Resident (#78), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of a continuous positive airway pressure machine (CPAP, machine used to treat sleep apnea). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), undated, indicated but was not limited to: - Policy: The operation of the CPAP machine is the responsibility of licensed staff. - Procedure: 1. Check physician orders. They should include the level of CPAP pressure and the oxygen liter flow if required. - Documentation: 1. Date and Time 2. CPAP mode 3. CPAP pressure 5. Patient's tolerance of procedure Resident #78 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses including hypertension and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Review of Resident #78's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, dated 4/4/24, indicated Resident #78 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had the skills necessary to meet the behavioral needs of one Resident (#10), out of a sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff had training in areas such as mental health needs and care of cognitively impaired residents. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, updated 6/1/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: - To achieve strong clinical out-comes, we continue to strive to develop skill set/competency of associates. We recognize the resident population we serve is affected by multiple co-morbidities requiring a well-rounded clinical team. - Category: Psychiatric/Mood Disorders; Common Diagnoses or Conditions: Impaired cognition, depression, anxiety disorder, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Dementia - Manage the medical conditions and medication-related issues causing psychiatric symptoms and behavior, identify and implement interventions to help support individuals with issues such as dealing with anxiety, care of someone with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#44) out of a total sample of 14 residents, was free from significant medication error when an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication was not administered according to physician's orders Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Unavailable Medications, last revised 2/2024, indicated, but was not limited to: -The facility maintains a contract with a pharmacy provider to supply the facility with routine, as needed (prn), and emergency medication. -An urgent (STAT) supply of commonly used medications is maintained in-house for timely initiation of medications. -Medications may be unavailable for a number of reasons. Staff shall take immediate action when it is known that the medication is unavailable: -Notify physician of inability to obtain medication upon notification or awareness that medication is not available. Obtain alternative treatment orders and/or specific orders for monitoring resident while medication is on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and staff education records reviewed for two direct care staff employees (Nurse #1 and Nurse #9) of eight employees reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that training on abuse, neglect, and exploitation prevention was included as mandatory training for direct care staff. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Training Requirements, dated as revised 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to: -Training requirements should be met prior to staff and volunteers independently providing services to residents, annually, and as necessary based on the facility assessment. -Training content includes, at a minimum: h. Abuse, neglect, and exploitation prevention -The Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) maintains a training schedule and documentation system for completed training by all staff, contracted staff, and volunteers. The facility was unable to provide the surveyor with an education folder/packet for Nurses #1 and #9. During an interview on 7/1/24 at 10:00 A.M., the SDC said all education files and records had been provided to the survey team. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-28 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff conducted testing and specimen collection in a manner that was consistent with current standards of practice for conducting COVID-19 tests and per manufacturer's instructions. Specifically, the facility failed to properly perform iHealth COVID-19 antigen rapid self-testing for four out of four staff members observed. Findings include: Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Specimen Collection, updated May 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Proper specimen collection is the most important step in the laboratory diagnosis of infectious diseases. A specimen that is not collected correctly may lead to false or inconclusive test results. -Follow the manufacturer's instructions for specimen collection. Review of the iHealth COVID-19 antigen rapid test instructions for use (IFU), revised December 2021, indicated the following: -Immediately after adding sample to the sample port, the result will be ready in 15 minutes Note: Do NOT interpret your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff provided care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for three Residents (#29, #53, and #63), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #29, to initiate a bowel protocol per physician's orders; 2. For Resident #53, to administer medications in accordance with standards of practice, instead leaving them with the Resident for self-administration; and 3. For Resident #63, to ensure orders were accurately transcribed and administered. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Bowel Protocol, revised 7/26/21, indicated but was not limited to the following: Purpose: -To assure residents have periodic bowel movements (BM) to prevent constipation Protocol: -The 7-3 charge nurse will initiate the laxative list on a daily basis (based on no BM x 3 days or however specified by MD) -The 7-3 charge nurse will either use a laxative form or document on the 24-hour report those residents who need to start a bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility in November 2020 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pneumonia. Review of current Physician's Orders indicated the following: -Change oxygen tubing weekly on Sunday, 11-7 shift and as needed (PRN) every night shift every Sunday related to COPD, 8/15/21 -Clean filter on oxygen concentrator weekly Sunday 11-7 every night shift every Sunday for maintenance, 9/5/21 During an observation with interview on 3/26/23 at 8:37 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #29 lying in bed with a nasal cannula (lightweight tube in which one end splits into two prongs which are placed in the nostrils from which a mixture of oxygen (O2) and air flows) in place attached to an oxygen concentrator device. A nebulizer machine was observed on top of the Resident's bedside table. The facemask was resting on top of the nebulizer machine, not contained, and exposed to potential environmental contaminants. Resident #29 said he/she was on continuous O2 for his/her breathing. During an observation with interview on 3/27/23 at 10:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a licensed nurse had the completed competencies to administer medications independently for Resident #49, resulting in medication errors. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration- General Guidelines, dated October 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have been properly oriented to the facility's medication distribution system (procurement, storage, handling and administration). -Five rights- right resident, right drug, right dose, right route and right time, are applied for each medication being administered. According to the Board of Registration in Nursing, 244 CMR 9.00 &10.00: Standards of Conduct, Definitions and Severability; a competency is defined as the application of knowledge and the use of affective, cognitive, and psychomotor skills required for the role of a nurse licensed by the Board and for the delivery of safe nursing care in accordance with accepted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not 5% or greater. A medication error rate of 7.41% was calculated following two observed errors of a total of 27 opportunities for error. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration- General Guidelines, dated October 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have been properly oriented to the facility's medication distribution system (procurement, storage, handling and administration). -Five rights- right resident, right drug, right dose, right route and right time, are applied for each medication being administered. The surveyor conducted medication administration observations of four nurses on two of two units between 3/27/23 and 3/28/23 with the following medication error observation. On 3/27/23 at 9:45 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #6 preparing and administering medications to Resident #49 as ordered for 9:00 A.M. (The surveyor was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented infection prevention and control practices and policies. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Follow infection control standards during a medication pass which included hand hygiene and proper handling of medication, and 2. Minimize the potential for cross-contamination (transfer of pathogens (biological contaminant) from one surface to another) of iHealth COVID-19 Antigen Rapid testing cards during the processing time. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration- General Guidelines, dated October 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Handwashing and hand sanitization: the person administering a medication adheres to good hand hygiene, which includes washing hands thoroughly before beginning a medication pass and prior to handling any medication. On 3/27/23 at 9:45 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #6 during medication administration. Nurse #6 was in orientation and unsupervised by a preceptor during the medication pass.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to accurately transcribe an eye drop medication for both eyes and clarify the order to obtain the dose to be administered for one Resident (#3), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review the facility's policy titled Consultants, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Consultants provide the Director of Nurses or Designee with written, dated, and signed reports of each consultation visit. Such reports contain the consultant's: a. Recommendations; b. Plans for implementation of his or her recommendations; c. Findings; and d. Plans for continued assessments. -The facility retains the professional and administrative responsibility for all services provided by the consultants. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in July 2019 with diagnoses which included primary open angle glaucoma, bilateral, severe stage, presence of intraocular lens, secondary cataract, left eye, cortical age related cataract right eye, age related nuclear cataract, right eye. Review of the Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications by continuing to administer an antibiotic, after it was determined the bacteria was resistant to the prescribed antibiotic for one Resident (#54), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with a diagnosis which included dementia. Review of a Nursing Note, dated 3/17/23 at 7:57 P.M., indicated but was not limited to the following: -At approximately 5:45 P.M., Resident #54 was noted to have a flush-warm face. Temperature checked and noted to be at 100.3 degrees Fahrenheit. As needed APAP (Tylenol) 650 mg given at this time. -Resident was unable to say what is wrong. -Physician paged to notify of temperature. Review of a Nursing Note, dated 3/17/23 at 8:10 P.M., indicated but was not limited to the following: -Physician returned page and gave new order to check CBC (Complete blood count)/BMP (basic metabolic panel) blood test on the next lab day and obtain Urinalysis with culture and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately completed to reflect the status for one Resident (#10), in a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments accurately reflected the Resident's bipolar disorder diagnosis. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion, dated 3/4/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, in order to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan; -According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity, using the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) specified by the State; -All disciplines shall follow the guidelines in Chapter 3 of the current RAI Manual for coding each assessment. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three Residents (#4, #51, and #3), out of a sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the MDS was coded accurately: 1. For Resident #4, for hospice benefit services; 2. For Resident #51, for the correct active diagnosis; and 3. For Resident #3, for having a restraint. Findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in February 2018 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 indicated he/she was admitted to Compassionate Care Hospice services in October 2022 and disenrolled in November 2022. During an interview on 3/26/23 at 12:34 P.M., Nurse #3 said Resident #4 was on hospice for a brief time a few months ago but was not currently. On review of the medical record, she confirmed that Resident #4 disenrolled from hospice services in November 2022 and the current quarterly MDS was inaccurately coded in Section O, special procedures, treatments and programs, because the Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-03-28 · tag F0642 — pattern
    Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed for one Resident (#25), of four residents reviewed, to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) within Resident assessment instrument (RAI) time guidelines. Findings include: Resident #25 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 and discharged to a Veteran's home in November 2022. Review of the medical record indicated the last MDS assessment for Resident #25 was completed in October 2022 and it was not a discharge MDS. There was no MDS initiated for the Resident's discharge in November 2022. During an interview on 3/27/23 at 7:13 A.M., the Administrator said the facility's MDS nurse had left the company about four or five months prior to survey and there was a corporate team of nurses completing the facility's MDS assessments. During an interview on 3/27/23 at 12:20 P.M., Corporate MDS Nurse #1 and Corporate MDS Nurse #2 reviewed the medical record of Resident #25 and said the Resident had been discharged in November 2022 and the MDS that should have been completed by 12/6/22 but had not yet been completed.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$24,635 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $15,139 — penalty dated 2024-07-01
  • $2,659 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
  • $2,279 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $4,558 — penalty dated 2024-01-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$354K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 58%Medicare 7%Other / private 35%

This home reported $354K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$378per resident / day
operating cost
$11,482per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$326per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225185. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next