Mayflower Place Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
579 Buck Island Road, West Yarmouth, MA 02673 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 72 certified beds · (413) 544-3329 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.2% | 16.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.2% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 15.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.5% | 15.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.6% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.8% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.4% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 30.6% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.0% | 77.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 39.1% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.5% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.67 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.48 | 1.50 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 471 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 74.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 185 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.9%CMS range 54.5–63.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.2%CMS range 9.8–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 74.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 69.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 11.4%CMS range 8.5–15.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 63.9 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for five Residents (#7, #84, #63, #4, and #72), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Residents #7 and #84, to ensure air mattress settings were implemented as ordered by the physician;2. For Resident #63, to ensure physician's orders for blood pressure medication administration were followed;3. For Resident #4, to ensure physician's orders for oxygen flow rate were followed; and4. For Resident #72, to ensure physician's orders for wound dressing treatments were followed. Findings include: Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11ed, dated 2019, indicated the following:-The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate the grievance process on behalf of one Resident (#52), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, for Resident #52, the facility failed to initiate an investigation when his/her pants were determined to be missing, file a grievance for the missing pants, and follow the grievance process, resulting in a 19-day delay in offering and/or providing alternative clothing.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Grievance Policy, dated August 8, 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following:-All residents and/or their representatives have the right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal.-Director of Social Services is the grievance official who is responsible for overseeing the grievance process.-Upon receipt of a grievance, the staff person receiving the grievance shall notify the appropriate nurse manager or supervisor.-An attempt to resolve the grievance shall be made immediately.-A written copy of the grievance will be provided to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an accurate medical record was maintained for one Resident (#83), out of three closed records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #83's medical record accurately reflected an emergent transfer to the hospital due to change in medical status. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Emergency Medical Transfer, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following:- It is the policy of [Facility name] to ensure that each Resident is offered access to a more intensive level of care when care needs increase while honoring rights to accept or refuse this higher level of care.- Document Emergency Medical assessment and transport in resident record. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility in June 2025 with diagnoses including hypertension and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #83's medical record indicated a discharge summary form completed by the physician indicating Resident #83 was discharged from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were accurately labeled and stored in accordance with acceptable professional standards. Specifically, in one of two medication carts reviewed, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in their original packaging.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals, dated as revised 6/30/25, indicated but was not limited to:-Facility should ensure the medications and biologicals for each resident are stored in the containers in which they were originally received. On 9/25/25 at 8:55 A.M., the surveyor, with Nurse #1 present, observed a medicine cup containing several unlabeled medications in the top drawer of the [NAME] Unit, front medication cart. The medicine cup included four medications:-one round white pill,-one round brown pill,-one yellow oval pill, and-one transparent yellow capsule During an interview on 9/25/25 at 8:56 A.M., Nurse #1 said she could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adhere to infection prevention and control standards of practice to prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Clean and disinfect shared equipment between residents for three of four Residents (#63, #37, and #25) observed during medication administration; and 2. Perform hand hygiene as indicated for three of four Residents (#63, #37, and #25) observed during medication administration. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Cleaning and Disinfecting Non-Critical Resident-Care Items under Environmental Infection Control, dated June 2011, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Reusable items are cleaned and disinfected or sterilized between residents (e.g., stethoscopes, durable medical equipment). -For disinfection, use Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registered and facility approved low-level disinfectant solution. -Clean and disinfect the surface area used to clean equipment. On 9/25/25 at 8:35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to properly label, date, and store food products in two of two nourishment kitchenettes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Safe Handling for Food Brought in From Visitors, dated effective 3/2023, indicated but was not limited to: - It is [Facility Name's] policy to assist residents in properly storing and safely consuming foods brought into the center for residents by visitors. - When food items are intended for later consumption, the responsible staff member will label foods with resident name and current date. - Refrigerator/freezers for storage of food brought in by visitors will be properly maintained. - Daily monitoring for refrigerated storage duration and discard of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections when the facility was currently experiencing an outbreak of COVID-19 infection. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure proper COVID-19 outbreak testing procedures were implemented for 3 of 3 facility staff members reviewed representing 2 of 2 COVID-19 affected units; 2a. Ensure staff rapid antigen COVID-19 testing (BinaxNOW) was conducted in a manner that is consistent with current standards of practice and manufacturer's instructions for use for 3 of 3 staff members observed; and b. Ensure proper infection control practices were followed while conducting rapid COVID-19 outbreak testing of staff using BinaxNOW antigen testing cards; and 3. Ensure staff implemented appropriate use of personal protective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement approaches to prevent falls and provide adequate oversight to prevent future falls for one Resident (#50) who was considered a fall risk and had suffered nine falls between January 2024 and June 5, 2024 resulting in three injuries on 3/3/24, 5/3/24, and 5/8/24 including one hospitalization, out of 17 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Incidents Falls, dated as reviewed 2/2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: - it is the policy of the facility to implement preventative measures to reduce residents' fall risk and risk of injury related to the same, and - all falls will be investigated as to their cause and interventions will be in place to prevent further falls. Review of the facility's policy titled Purposeful Rounding, dated as revised 4/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - purpose of the policy is to ensure resident needs are met and reduce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on line listing review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their antibiotic stewardship program. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain complete surveillance line listing reports to ensure antibiotic use protocols were followed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship - Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes, revised December 2016, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a surveillance tracking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual antibiotic prescribing practices and facility-wide antibiotic stewardship. -All resident antibiotic regimens will be documented on the facility tracking form. The information gathered will include: b. symptoms and start date of symptoms f. pathogen identified, if identified, and date identified Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship - Orders for Antibiotics, revised December 2016, indicated but was not limited to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain comfortable room temperatures for two Residents (#18 and #19) residing on one of two units, out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #18 was readmitted to the facility in March 2024 and had diagnoses including urinary tract infection, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, obstructive and reflux uropathy, COVID-19, cough, and impaired vision. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/5/24, indicated Resident #18 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. During an observation with interview on 8/5/24 at 11:08 A.M., the surveyor, upon entering the room, felt the room to be very warm and humid. Resident #18 was lying in bed. The windowpane on the wall to the Resident's left was in an open position with warm air entering the room. The air conditioning (AC) unit was blowing warm air. The Resident said he/she was positive for COVID-19 and the window kept blowing open off and on for a week now. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure there was a resolution for a grievance/complaint of an allegation of physical abuse for one Resident (#57), out of six grievances reviewed. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Grievance policy, dated 8/8/2017, included but was not limited to the following: - The facility Director of Social Services is the Grievance official who is responsible for overseeing the grievance process including receiving and tracking grievances to conclusion. - If the grievance involves an allegation of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, exploitation or injuries of unknown source, the incident or allegation shall be investigated and reported immediately to the Director of Nursing, Administrator or grievance official. - Upon completion of the review, the grievance official should document the following: steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the grievance, a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not, and any corrective action…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for potential physical abuse by a staff member for one Resident (#57), out of 17 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to investigate and report an allegation of physical abuse for Resident #57, in accordance with the facility's abuse policy. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Training & Identification and Reporting Incidents that may be indicative of abuse and neglect, dated as revised 7/2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: - To provide training and direction for identifying and reporting incidents/events that may be incidents of abuse and/or neglect. - All staff, residents and families will be provided training and will be knowledgeable in the definition of abuse, including mental abuse. - Training on abuse prevention will be provided during on hire orientation, annually and whenever there is a need for re-education. - Supervise/monitor staff to identify possible inappropriate behaviors, such as use of derogatory language, rough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was reported timely to the state agency as required for one Resident (#57), of a total sample of 17 residents Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Investigation guidelines for allegations of abuse or neglect, dated as revised 7/17, indicated, but was not limited to the following: - When an alleged or suspected case of abuse, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, or injuries of unknown origin is reported, the Administrator, or designee, will immediately notify the State Agency but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation of abuse or result in serious bodily injury - Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury to the State Agency and all other persons or agencies in accordance by State law through established procedures. - Reports to the state agency will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for one Resident (#57), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was thoroughly investigated in accordance with the facility's abuse policy. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Investigation Guidelines for Allegations of Abuse or Neglect, dated as revised 7/17, indicated, but was not limited to the following: - All reports of resident abuse, neglect, mental abuse, mistreatment, and injuries of an unknown origin (bruises, skin tears) shall be investigated thoroughly and promptly by facility management. - The Administrator, Director of Nursing or her/his designee will coordinate gathering of information for purposes of investigation on all alleged incidents. - The Investigator will obtain a complete report outlining the event. Interviews will be conducted as directed by Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed for one Resident (#12), out of a total sample of 17 residents, to develop and implement individualized person-centered care plans to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans, including measurable objectives and timeframes were implemented. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, dated July 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Facility will develop and implement an individualized interdisciplinary plan of care for each resident that includes instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care. -The Comprehensive Care Plan will be reviewed and revised on a quarterly basis, with a significant change in condition, on re-admission from inpatient hospital stay, and as requested by the Resident/Representative. -The Comprehensive Care Plan will be ongoing, focusing on each individual resident as a unitary being. -Residents and their representatives will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and ensure diagnostic tests were completed timely, as ordered, for two Residents (#20 and #13), out of a sample of 17 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Orders, dated as revised 11/2005, indicated but was not limited to the following: - physician's orders are to be transcribed by licensed personnel only - the nurse transcribing the order is responsible for ensuring that needed labs are obtained and shall indicate that each order has been noted Review of the facility's policy titled Diagnostic Services Guidelines, dated 1/2014, indicated but was not limited to the following: - the purpose is to provide laboratory and other diagnostic studies for the residents in the facility as ordered - physicians order the diagnostic service to be performed - laboratory and other diagnostic services are available 24 hours per day 7 days per week - diagnostic results are to be obtained and included in the medical record Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for the care of an indwelling catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag outside the body) for one Resident (#18), out of total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff were consistently providing Foley catheter care and ongoing assessment to help prevent catheter-related urinary tract infections and any related problems. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Catheter Care - Indwelling, revised July 2006, indicated but was not limited to the following: Purpose: -To ensure that indwelling catheters are patent. -To minimize the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infections and its related problems. -To observe for increased sedimentation, mucous, crepitus, presence of hematuria or decreased drainage. Procedure: -Wash resident's perineal area with soap per-wash and warm water. -Roll catheter gently between fingers near the meatus to check for pressure of crepitus (feels like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were coordinated with the hospice provider to implement the resident's plan of care as required in the provider contract agreement for three Residents (#30, #21, #50), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #30, to provide on-going documentation, and maintain a complete medical record of services to ensure prompt and effective communication for continuity of care for the Resident; 2. For Resident #50, to ensure a current signed recertification statement for hospice eligibility and a schedule of hospice services were available in the medical record to maintain continuity of care; and 3. For Resident #21, to provide a schedule of hospice services, including involvement and collaboration of the coordinated plan of care. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Palliative or Hospice Care, dated [DATE], indicated but was not limited to: - To ensure that all residents who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing as being at high risk for falls, and whose comprehensive plan of care indicated he/she required the use of a mat on the floor next to his/her bed for safety, the Facility failed to ensure to staff consistently implemented and followed safety interventions identified in his/her plan of care related to the use of floor mat(s) while in bed. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Comprehensive Care Plans, dated July 2023, indicated the interdisciplinary team will develop and implement an individualized interdisciplinary plan of care for each resident that includes instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in January 2024, diagnoses included dementia with anxiety, psychotic disorder with delusions, acute posthemorrhagic anemia, restlessness and agitation, restless leg syndrome, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and history of COVID-19. Review of Resident #1's Fall Risk Care Plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of four sampled Employee Personnel File (Nurse Aide (NA) #1), who was contracted to work at the Facility through a staffing agency, the Facility failed to ensure that Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) and Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) checks were conducted prior to her date of employment at the Facility, in accordance with their Abuse Policy. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, dated as revised 2017, indicated the following: -The Facility will not knowingly hire an individual who has had a history of abuse or who has a finding(s) entered into the nurse aide registry, -All potential employees will be screened prior to employment to rule out a history of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation or exploitation of residents, and -The Facility will conduct employee background screening checks that include a criminal background check no later than the date of initial orientation and verification with the appropriate licensing boards and nurse aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was cognitively intact, and required maximum assistance from staff to meet his/her care needs, the Facility failed to ensure that after being made aware on 10/15/23 of an allegation of potential verbal abuse, that they obtained and maintained evidence that a thorough investigation was completed. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, dated as revised 2017, indicated the following: -All reports of resident abuse, neglect, mental abuse, mistreatment, and injuries of unknown origin (bruises, skin tears) shall be investigated thoroughly and promptly by facility management, -The Administrator, Director of Nurses (DON) or his/her designee will coordinate gathering of information for purposes of investigation of all alleged incidents, -The investigator will obtain a complete report outlining the event, -The individual conducting the investigation will identify and interview all individuals who are relevant to the incident, -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all medications were properly stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles on two of two units reviewed with four of four medication carts reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, revised January 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: Expiration Dating: -Certain medications or package types such as multiple dose injectable vials and ophthalmics require an expiration date shorter than the manufacturer's expiration date to ensure medication purity and potency -Drugs dispensed in the manufacturer's original container will carry the manufacturer's expiration date. Once opened, these will be good to use until the manufacturer's expiration date is reached unless the medication is in a multi-dose injectable vial or an item for which the manufacturer has specified a usable life after opening. -When the original seal of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure food was stored, labeled, dated and maintained under sanitary conditions in the main kitchen walk-in refrigerator and freezer; 2. Handle ready to eat food (food which does not require cooking or further preparation prior to consumption) utilizing proper hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination; and 3. Wear hair restraints in the main kitchen during meal preparation and service. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indicated but was not limited to: -2-402 Hair Restraints 2-402.11 Effectiveness. (A) Except as provided in (B) of this section, FOOD EMPLOYEES shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance Committee identified quality deficient areas and to develop and implement an appropriate corrective action plan, to ensure satisfactory outcomes from concerns brought forth from resident council meetings. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, dated as revised October 2013, indicated the following: Feedback, Data Systems and Monitoring: -Monitoring care and services -Collecting data from various sources -Tracking, investigating and monitoring adverse events and action plans to prevent reoccurrence Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) -Conducts PIPs to examine and improve care and services in areas needing improvement -PIP identifies a specific problem which may be specific to one area or a problem that is throughout the facility -Information gathering to clarify issues or problems and identify approaches for improvement During the group…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement the facility's grievance policy for five of five grievances reviewed for Residents (#4, #9, #1B, #30, and #1A). Specifically, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate grievances identified in the Grievance log, and/or if a grievance/complaint involved a potential violation of a resident right or allegation of abuse or misappropriation, they were reported to the state agency. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Grievance policy, undated, included but was not limited to: -The facility's Grievance Official is the Director of Social Services. He/she is responsible for overseeing the grievance process, receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion; leading any necessary investigations by the facility; issuing written grievance decisions to the resident; and coordinating with state and federal agencies as necessary in light of specific allegations; -Allegations of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property along with injuries of unknown source will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's policy and thoroughly investigated, reported, and/or protected the resident's safety for seven Residents (#39, #218, #4, #9, #1B, #30, and #1A), of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #39, to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse by a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was thoroughly investigated in accordance with the facility abuse policy; 2. For Resident #218, to ensure an allegation of mistreatment was investigated after the Resident witnessed the alleged verbal abuse of Resident #39 by a CNA; and 3. For Residents #4, #9, #1B, #30, and #1A, to ensure staff thoroughly investigated and protected the Residents pending the outcome of the investigations of alleged mistreatment, abuse, and neglect. Findings include: Review of the facility's policies titled Training & Identification and Reporting Incidents that may be indicative of abuse and neglect, last revised 7/2017, and Investigation Guidelines for Allegations of Abuse or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that allegations of resident abuse were reported in accordance with the facility policy, for seven Residents, (#39, #218, #4, #9, #1B, #30, #1A), of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #39, an allegation of verbal abuse by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was reported timely to the state agency, as required; 2. For Resident #218, an allegation of mistreatment was reported timely to the state agency after the Resident witnessed the alleged verbal abuse of their roommate (Resident #39) by a CNA.; and 3. For Residents #4, #9, #1B, #30, #1A, allegations of a potential violation of a resident right or allegation of neglect, abuse, or misappropriation were immediately reported to the Department of Public Health (DPH) within two hours in accordance with federal guidelines. Findings include: Review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect Policy, effective 7/17, indicated that When an alleged or suspected case of abuse, mistreatment, neglect,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for seven Residents (#39, #218, #4, #9, #1B, #30, #1A), of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #39, to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was thoroughly investigated in accordance with the facility abuse policy; 2. For Resident #218, to ensure an allegation of mistreatment was thoroughly investigated after the Resident witnessed the alleged verbal abuse of Resident #39 by a CNA; and 3. For Residents #4, #9, #1B, #30, #1A, to ensure staff thoroughly investigated and protected the Residents pending the outcome of the investigations of alleged mistreatment, abuse, and neglect. Findings include: Review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect Policy, revised 7/17, indicated that All reports of resident abuse, neglect, mental abuse, mistreatment and injuries of an unknown origin (bruises, skin tears) shall be investigated thoroughly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that individualized, comprehensive care plans were developed and consistently implemented for two Residents (#45 and #39), out of 18 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #45, to consistently implement care plan interventions for the Resident's risk for falls; and 2. For Resident #39, to develop a care plan for the care and treatment of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line, or for a urinary tract infection (UTI) with Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (strain of bacteria). Findings include: 1. Resident #45 was admitted to the facility in November 2022 with diagnoses including dementia and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/12/23, indicated Resident #45 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 out of 15, required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, bathing, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate supervision and consistently implemented effective care plan interventions to prevent seven falls for one Resident (#24), out of 18 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policies titled Incidents: Falls, last reviewed 2/2018 and Incidents: Other, last revised 1/2020, included but was not limited to: -It is the policy of the facility to implement preventative measures to reduce residents' fall risk and risk of injury related to the same. -It is our policy that all falls will be investigated for causative factors and interventions will be in place to prevent further falls. -Investigative packet will be completed by the floor nurse within 48 hours and given to Quality Assurance Registered Nurse (QA RN)/Director of Nursing Services (DNS) to review for further investigation and completion. -The QA nurse or DNS will then create a root cause analysis and generate a summary of analysis findings. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three Residents (#13, #24, and #45) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, in a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #13, resident specific, targeted behaviors were identified and monitored for the use of Clonazepam (used to treat anxiety), Zyprexa (antipsychotic), and Lamotrigine (anticonvulsant that also treats bipolar disorder); 2. For Resident #24, resident specific, targeted behaviors were identified and monitored for the use of Sertraline (antidepressant); and 3. For Resident #45, resident specific, targeted behaviors were identified and monitored for the use of Citalopram (antidepressant) and Risperdal (antipsychotic). Findings include: 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in November 2021 with diagnoses including anxiety and bipolar disorder. Review of the 5/3/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #13 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 and received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and test tray results, the facility failed to ensure foods and beverages were prepared by methods which conserved nutritional value, flavor, appearance, palatability, and appetizing temperatures for two of three test trays observed. Findings include: During a Resident Group Meeting with the surveyor on 6/12/23 at 1:44 P.M., seven of the nine residents in attendance said the food was cold. On 6/13/23 at 11:44 A.M., the surveyor observed lunch service preparations in the main kitchen and made the following observations: -Cook #2 was preparing the four-cheese baked macaroni and cheese. She was observed putting pasta onto the steam table and then pouring the hot cheese sauce over the pasta and mixing it together. -Cook #2 was then observed preparing the pureed baked four cheese casserole and cauliflower (separately in the food processor and adding water to liquefy the contents). -Cook #2 prepared regular texture baked four cheese casserole, by plating the macaroni and cheese and then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that acceptable infection control and prevention measures were implemented to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff properly handled a medication tablet that was dropped into the medication cart during the medication pass observation; 2. For Resident #56, ensure resident care equipment was santized following its use for a Resident with an active infection and on transmission-based precautions; and 3. Develop and implement a Water Management Program as part of their ongoing risk management for Legionella infection or other waterborne pathogens with a system of surveillance that included a facility risk assessment, testing protocols, ongoing monitoring of control measure locations, and annual water testing. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revised August 2019, indicated but was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed for one Resident (#16), out of a total sample of 18 residents, to safely maintain and store respiratory tubing when not in use by the Resident per the physician's order. Findings include: Resident # 16 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with diagnoses which included interstitial pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/30/23, indicated the Resident was receiving oxygen therapy. Review of the Physician's Orders, dated 5/17/23, indicated to administer Oxygen at two liters per minute as needed, may titrate two liters per minute to maintain oxygen saturation greater than 88 percent, every shift as needed; and store tubing in plastic bag when not in use. Label the bag with the resident's name and date changed. On 06/13/23 at 04:07 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #16's oxygen tubing on the floor, near the concentrator that was turned off. The nasal cannula was not stored in a plastic bag. On 6/14/23 at 08:08 A.M. and 11:50 A.M., the surveyor observed the Resident's tubing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Hospice provider provided Home Health Aide (HHA) services per the plan of care, for one Resident (#37), out of a sample of 18 residents. Findings include: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses including moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia, unspecified and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Resident's Physician's Orders dated June 2023 indicated to: -Admit to hospice, (4/13/23). Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 4/25/23, indicated Resident #37 was receiving hospice care. Review of the Nursing Facility Services Agreement, dated 2/20/17, with the selected hospice provider indicated but was not limited to the Hospice plan of care shall reflect the participation of Hospice, Facility, Hospice Patient and Patient's family to the extent possible. The plan of care must identify the care and services that are needed and specify which provider is responsible for performing the respective functions. Review of the medical record indicated a Hospice Comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on policy/document review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that one staff member, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3, out of 5 employee files reviewed, received annual abuse/neglect training in accordance with the facility policy. Findings include: Review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect policy, revised 2017, indicated that, Training in abuse prevention will be provided during on hire orientation, annually and whenever there is a need for re-education. During the investigation of the facility's handling of two residents' allegations of abuse by CNA #3, personnel training documents were reviewed for compliance with the facility policy on staff education for abuse/neglect. Review of CNA #3's personnel file on 6/15/23, indicated that the CNA had not received annual education on abuse/neglect in 2020, 2021, and 2022. During an interview on 6/15/23 at 5:15 P.M., the Director of Nursing said that CNA #3 had not received annual education on Abuse/Neglect, in accordance with the facility's policy.
- No harm found · C2025-11-14 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information which included the current date and actual hours worked per shift for licensed and unlicensed staff including Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA), and the resident census was posted daily as required. Findings include: On 9/24/25 at 7:16 A.M., the surveyor did not observe any nurse staffing posting in the lobby, hallways or nursing units.On 9/25/25 at 7:00 A.M., the surveyor did not observe any nurse staffing posting in the lobby, hallways or nursing units.On 9/29/25 at 7:04 A.M., the surveyor did not observe any nurse staffing posting in the lobby, hallways or nursing units.During an interview on 9/29/25 at 12:43 P.M., the Scheduler said she has been managing the nursing schedule for the facility for the past two years. The Scheduler said she completes a nursing schedule daily which includes all nurses and certified nursing assistants working for that day. The Scheduler said she does not complete a daily staffing posting including the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-08-12 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the status for one Resident (#19), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder and chronic congestive heart failure. Review of the MDS assessments, dated 3/13/24 and 6/12/24, indicated in Section O-Special Treatments and Programs, Resident #12 received Hospice services. Further review of the paper and electronic medical record failed to indicate a Physician's order, documentation, or care plans to reflect Resident #19 received Hospice services. During an interview on 8/7/24 at 2:19 P.M., MDS Nurse #2 and the surveyor reviewed the MDS assessments, dated 3/13/24 and 6/12/24. MDS Nurse #2 said Resident #19 did not receive Hospice services during those assessment dates and the MDSs were not accurate. MDS Nurse #2 said Hospice services were checked in error.
- No harm found · C2023-06-15 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Resident and/or the Resident's representative and the Ombudsman were provided with a written notice of transfer as required for one Resident (#37), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in August 2022. Review of the Physician's Interim/Telephone Orders, dated 3/10/23, indicated a new order to transfer the Resident to the hospital for an evaluation post positive stool guaiac sample (blood present in stool). Review of the clinical record failed to document the facility provided the Resident/ Resident's family with the required transfer notification documentation and appeal notification when the Resident was transferred to the hospital in March 2023 for evaluation. Further review of the clinical record included no evidence that the notice of transfer and a copy of the emergency transfer were sent to the Ombudsman's office. During an interview on 6/14/23 at 10:23 A.M., the Social Service Director said that Admissions was handling notice of transfer/…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-06-15 · tag F0625 — widespreadNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's representative was provided with a written notice of a bed-hold as required for one Resident (#37), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Findings include: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 and had an Activated Health Care Proxy. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #37 was transferred to the hospital in March 2023. Further review of the medical record failed to indicate that a facility bed-hold notice was issued to the Resident Representative as required for the March 2023 transfer. During an interview on 6/14/23 at 10:23 A.M., the Social Service Director said that Admissions was handling bed hold notices. During an interview on 6/14/23 at 10:30 A.M., in the presence of the Social Service Director, the Admissions Director said nurses do not turn in the bed hold notices to her office when residents are transferred out to the hospital. She said nurses would verbally tell her the resident's name of who was transferred out and she would contact the family via telephone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| G&H SE HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/11/2025 |
| MAPLEWOOD OPERATING HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/11/2025 |
| AMX HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/11/2025 |
| ARX HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/11/2025 |
| MLX HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/11/2025 |
| SHX HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/11/2025 |
| TGX HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/11/2025 |
| GASTON, THOMAS | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/11/2025 |
| HERLET, SHANE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/11/2025 |
| LEFKOWITZ, MATHEW | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/11/2025 |
| MILLER, ARTHUR | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/11/2025 |
| MAPLEWOOD SENIOR LIVING, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/09/2026 |
| BREWER, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2026 |
| LEWIS, DIANNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/18/2024 |
| YUNG, ALARICK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/17/2025 |
| BAKER TILLY ADVISORY GROUP LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $536K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225374. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.