Beaumont Rehab & Skilled Nursing Ctr - Westboro

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 252 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 147 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 143.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required set up assistance with meals and beverages, the Facility failed to ensure his/her environment was free from accidents resulting in serious injury, when on 1/16/26, a staff member served Resident #1 a hot cup of coffee that had been reheated in the microwave, however the staff member did not check the temperature of the coffee, in accordance with facility policy, before serving it to him/her. The hot coffee was spilled onto Resident #1, and he/she sustained second degree burns (partial thickness, involves both the first and second layer of skin and appears red, blistered, and maybe swollen or painful) to his/her bilateral upper thighs, which required daily treatment and monitoring by nursing.Findings include:Review of the Facility's protocol titled Microwave Safety for Hot Liquids dated 05/08/2011, indicated any liquids heated in the microwave will have temperature checked and the acceptable serving temperature is between 135-155 degrees Fahrenheit.Review of the American Burn…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two Residents (#11 and #6), out of a total sample of 30 residents, were free from significant medication errors. Specifically, the staff failed to: 1. For Resident #11, ensure that Seroquel (a medication used to help regulate mood, behaviors and thoughts) was accurately transcribed onto the Medication Administration Record (MAR), resulting in the Resident missing 19 doses of the prescribed medication, and increasing the risk for worsening mood and behavior patterns. 2. For Resident #6, ensure Metoprolol Tartrate (medication used to treat high blood pressure) and Midodrine (medication used to treat low blood pressure) were administered to the Resident in accordance with physician ordered parameters, increasing the Resident's risk for adverse medication reactions. Findings include: 1. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses including Dementia, Parkinson's Disease, and Adjustment disorder with depressed mood. Review of the Resident's written Physician's Order, dated 2/24/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide food at safe and appetizing temperatures to residents from two out of three lunch meal carts on two Units ([NAME] Unit and [NAME] Unit) out of three total resident units.Specifically, the facility failed to provide food at safe and appetizing temperatures for the lunch meal for Residents eating lunch on the [NAME] Unit and [NAME] Unit, increasing residents' risks for reduced food/fluid intake. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Food: Quality and Palatability, revised February 2023, included but was not limited to: -Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance. -Food will be palatable, attractive and served at a safe and appetizing temperature.-Food and liquids are prepared and served in a manner, form and texture to meet resident's needs.-Food should be at the appropriate temperature as determined by the type of food to ensure residents' satisfaction. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to adequately resolve grievances for two Residents (#82 and #7) out of a total sample of 30 residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:1. For Resident #82, -identify steps taken to investigate the Resident's grievance with respect to care not being provided.-summarize pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the Resident's concern with respect to care not being provided.-state whether the Resident's grievance with respect to care not being provided was confirmed or not confirmed.2. For Resident #7, the facility failed to adequately resolve the Resident's grievance for missing dentures in a timely manner when the Resident's lower dentures were missing. Findings include: Review of the facility's Grievance and Complaint Policy, dated October 1998 and revised 7/31/12, indicated the facility has a process that provides residents and families with a means to assure complaints or grievances regarding care or lack of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement the person-centered care plan relative to transfers for one Resident (#70) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, for Resident #70, the facility failed to ensure that two staff assists were utilized per his/her plan of care when transferring the Resident with the use of a mechanical lift, putting the Resident at risk for injury or falls. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Planning, undated with revision date 11/28/18, indicated the following: -Our facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. -The care plan is based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and developed by a Care Planning/Interdisciplinary team . Review of the facility policy titled Safe Lifting and Movement, dated 3/30/11 with revision date 8/1/18, indicated the following: -This policy describes ways to ensure that employees use safe methods for lifting and moving elders in the nursing facility in order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three Residents (#3, #11, and #15), out of a total sample of 30 residents was provided the right to participate in their care plan process.Specifically, for Residents (#3, #11, and #15), the facility failed to ensure that each Resident was invited to participate in their individual care plan meeting process and the facility also failed to provide rationale as to why the participation of the three Residents was determined not practicable for the development of the care plan.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Resident's Rights, dated 11/28/17 and revised 9/5/25, included the following:-The Federal and State laws guarantee basic rights to all residents of this facility:>be informed of, and participate in, his/her care planning and treatment. Review of the facility Patient and Resident Guide, dated 1/4/22, included the following:>We encourage you to participate in the development of your plan of care with our interdisciplinary team. Together we will develop goals based on your needs .>Regular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and services related to an indwelling urinary catheter (thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine outside the body) for two Residents (#93 and #51), out of a total sample of 30 residents.Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #93, to implement the physician's orders relative to the correct indwelling urinary catheter size as ordered by the Physician, increasing the Resident's risk for indwelling urinary catheter complications.2. For Resident #51, to ensure that the urinary catheter drainage bag was not placed directly on the floor, placing the Resident at risk for contamination and infection. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Reception and Transcription of Physician Orders, revised, 5/16/24, included but limited to:*Is to provide guidelines for the safe and effective means to receive, transcribe and implement physician's orders. -Attending physician (MD-medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards of practice for one Resident (#93), out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, for Resident #93, the facility failed to ensure that Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs - the use of protective gowns and gloves during high contact care activities that may provide opportunity for transmission of medication resistant organisms through staff hands and/or clothing), were appropriately utilized when providing high contact care for the Resident, to mitigate the risk of organism transmission and the spread of infection to the Resident and other residents within the facility. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 4/6/2023, included but was not limited to:*Enhanced Barrier Precautions expand the use of personal protective equipment (PPE: items such as gowns and gloves worn to prevent the spread of infection) and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities that provide opportunities…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a device utilized for one Resident (#38), was assessed when used as a physical restraint, for one applicable Resident who had nephrostomy tubes (tubes that drain urine from the kidneys into drainage bags), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assess Resident #38 for the need of an abdominal binder (wide compression belt that encircles the abdomen) to cover Resident #38's nephrostomy sites to prevent him/her from pulling on the nephrostomy tubes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Physical Restraints, last revised 10/28/15, indicated: -it is the policy of this facility to use a physical restraint on a resident when alternatives have failed, and it is required by a medical symptom. Every effort will be made to use the least restrictive device with the goal of reducing or eliminating the restraint as soon as possible. -a physical restraint is defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a Level II [comprehensive evaluation that identifies the specialized services required] Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- evaluation done if it was determined by the Level I [initial pre-screening] screen that a resident had an intellectual or developmental disability and/or serious mental illness [SMI] and if a resident was in need of additional support services at the facility) screen was submitted for one Resident (#36), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #36, the facility staff failed to request a Level II PASARR evaluation when the Resident demonstrated an increase in behavioral, psychiatric, and mood-related symptoms resulting in a change to the Resident's plan of care. Findings include: Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder (chronic mood disorder characterized by manic, hypomanic and depressive episodes, Depression and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive Trauma Informed Care Plan for one Resident (#36), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #36, the facility failed to complete an assessment and ensure that a comprehensive Trauma Informed Care Plan was developed relative to the Resident's history of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy for Trauma Informed Care, last revised 5/2020, indicated: -acknowledging that trauma is widespread and can affect anyone, and understanding how it can manifest in behaviors and presentations. -care plan will be developed to communicate this history and how it impacts the individualized care of the resident. -all staff members receive comprehensive training in trauma informed care principles and practices. -regularly monitoring the effectiveness of trauma-informed practices and making necessary adjustments. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder and depressive episodes,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,735 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,735 — penalty dated 2026-02-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA