Westfield Rehabilitation and Health Center
37 Feeding Hills Road, Westfield, MA 01085 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (413) 568-2341 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $49,296 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-08)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.2% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.6% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.1% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.3% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.7% | 15.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.0% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.1% | 21.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.0% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.5% | 77.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.5% | 11.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.67 | 1.88 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.62 | 1.50 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.2%CMS range 29.9–50.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 8.3–17.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 5.5–14.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.82 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 63.8 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that food was prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's main kitchen.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:1. that a fan in use in the main kitchen was clean and free from dust and debris.2. that an open window in the main kitchen had a screen to prevent outside elements including dust and insects from getting into the kitchen and contaminating food and food preparation surfaces.Findings include:On 4/1/26 at 7:20 A.M., the surveyor observed the following in the facility's main kitchen:-Uncovered muffins on the counter across from a fan in use that was blowing in the direction of the muffins.-The fan in use was covered in dust and debris build-up.-An open window (approximately 18-24 inches) had no screen to protect from outside elements.-The fan in use was located directly in front of the open window with no screen.During an interview directly following the kitchen observations, Directory Aide #1 said the facility was aware of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team and changes implemented as required for one Resident (#22), out of a total sample of 16 residents. Specifically, for Resident #22, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was revised to reflect the updated recommendations from the Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) and Occupational Therapy (OT) relative to:-changes in the level of supervision by staff during the Resident's meals from Physician ordered supervision (staff present while the Resident was eating) to Rehabilitation Therapy recommended intermittent supervision (staff would occasionally observe Resident during meals).-straws were able to be utilized by the Resident when there were current Physician orders for no use of straws.-addition of adaptive equipment including two handled mugs for meals which was not implemented. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility menus were followed for resident meals. Specifically, the facility failed to: -ensure the daily menus posted reflected the actual meals provided and that breakfast meals were posted on the daily menus and match the approved menus. -notify residents when menu items were substituted. -ensure residents who required pureed meals were notified of what their meals were and not provided with leftover food items from previously served meals. -provide the residents with adequate alternate options for menu items. Findings include: Review of facility menus, provided to the survey team on 1/7/25 indicated the following dinner menu for 1/7/25 and 1/8/25: -Dinner for 1/7/25: fish kiev, buttered noodles, herbed green beans, breadstick, diced pears -Dinner for 1/8/25: beef chili, broccoli cuts, corn bread, margarine, apple pie On 1/7/25 at 5:11 P.M., the surveyor observed the dinner provided to the residents which consisted of breaded chicken, mashed potatoes and mixed vegetables. On 1/8/25 at 5:09…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in the facility's main kitchen increasing the potential risk of food related illnesses. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: -Kitchen surfaces and equipment were clean and free of dust and debris. -Temperatures were obtained prior to meal service to ensure food was safe to be served to residents. -Food was thawed appropriately to minimize risk of food related illness. -Food items were labeled and dated when stored. -The dish machine temperatures were within appropriate ranges for use. Findings include: Review of the Manufacturer's Guidelines for the AM Select Dishwasher, dated February 2005, indicated the following relative to the facility dishmachine: -High Temperature Dishmachine: Wash Temperature 150-165 degrees Farenheit Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FSD) Food Code, dated 2022, indicated the following: -Thawing. Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food shall be thawed: (A) Under refrigeration that maintains the food temperature at 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for two Residents (#2 and #40), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, for Resident #2 and #40, the facility failed to ensure that the bathroom sink in a shared room by both Residents was maintained in a safe and homelike manner. Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in August 2020, with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the following: -the Resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of a possible score of 15. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in October 2022, with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Review of Resident #40's MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated the following: -the Resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a BIMS score of 15 out of a possible score of 15. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services relative to an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine outside the body, for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically for Resident #10, the facility staff failed to follow the Physician order's relative the Foley Catheter size (a type of indwelling urinary catheter), and ensure the proper size Foley Catheter was available in the facility, increasing the Resident's risk for indwelling urinary catheter complications. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary, revised September 2014, indicate the following: -Preparation: 1. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. 2. Assemble the equipment and supplies as needed. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, retention of urine, and Chronic Kidney Disease - Stage Three. Review of January 2025 Physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional care and services, according to professional standards of practice for two Residents (#40 and #12) out of a total sample of 20 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #40, accurately monitor and assess the Resident's fluids intake amounts as ordered by the Physician. 2. For Resident #12, obtain a re-weight when the Resident experienced weight loss. Findings include: 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in October 2022, with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD), dependence on renal dialysis and chronic systolic heart failure. Review of the Facility Policy titled End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with, established 2001, last revised January 2019, indicated the following: -Staff caring for residents with ESRD, including residents receiving dialysis care outside the facility, shall be trained in the care and special needs of these residents as applicable. -Examples…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food provided to residents was palatable and of appropriate temperatures on one unit (Willow) of two units observed. Findings include: During the initial pool process, conducted on 1/7/25, the residents had the following concerns relative to the facility food provided: -one Resident reported he/she had numerous food concerns about breakfast. The portions served were too small, he/she had told numerous staff and no one from the kitchen has come to speak with him/her. The Resident reported he/she would like more eggs and oatmeal in the morning. -six Residents said the food was terrible, not good or could be better. -one Resident requested more fruit on the menu. -one Resident said the supper meal was particularly bad. -one Resident, who was observed to have numerous food/beverage items purchased outside of the facility, said the food was not good, the hot food was not hot and the food served was limp and could blow in the wind. The Resident further indicated no one from the facility had talked to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for four Residents (#40, #33, #118 and #12), out of a total sample of 20 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #40, accurately document the total 24 hour fluid measurements as ordered by the Physician when Resident #40 was identified as having a fluid restrictions order of 1200 milliliters (ml) per day. 2. For Resident #33, ensure the MOLST (Medical Order for Life Sustaining Treatment) form was accurate and completed to ensure that the Resident's wishes were honored. 3. For Resident #118, ensure the Medical Provider Progress Notes were located in the clinical record. 4. For Resident #12, ensure that Provider Progress Notes written by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) were included and accessible in the Resident's medical record. Findings include: 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in October 2022, with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an infection control program that ensured residents in the facility were provided with a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment aimed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for three Residents (#48, #60, and #118) out of a total sample of 20 residents and on one Unit (Willow Unit) out of two units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. for Resident #48, conduct on going surveillance for a communicable disease when the Resident was diagnosed with Shingles (a viral infection the causes painful rash). 2. ensure a glucometer on the [NAME] Unit was disinfected appropriately after use and prior to storing. 3. ensure that staff donned (put on) the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during a medication and tube feed administration for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control measures that use gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug resistant organisms [MDROs]).performed hand hygiene and PPE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#48) out a total sample of 20 residents, was provided a dignified experience. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that privacy was provided when the Resident was observed from the hallway with undergarments and legs exposed during a rehabilitation therapy session. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dignity, revised August 2009, indicated each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality. The policy also included the following: -Residents will be treated with dignity and respect at all times. -Staff shall promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses including Renal Failure and Coronary Heart Disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/25/24, indicated Resident #48: -was cognitively intact as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a secure space was provided for Residents' personal belongings for five of nine Residents who participated in the Resident Council Meeting. Findings include: Review of the facility admission Agreement, undated, indicated the following: -Personal Property >We (the facility) provide residents with a locked space for personal property. The facility will provide a key to a drawer in each resident's bedside table. During the Resident Council Group Meeting held on 1/9/25 from 1:06 P.M. to 1:30 P.M., five of the nine Residents in attendance said their nightstand locked drawer did not work or they did not have a key to lock their locked drawer. One Resident said there are other residents who wander on the units and often go in and out of other resident rooms and he/she was worried about not being able to lock his/her personal belongings up. A second Resident said he/she had to purchase his/her own lockbox as the facility did not provide one for him/her. All five Residents stated they had discussed these concerns with staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations to ensure that one Resident (#44) out of a total sample of 20 residents, had his/her call light accessible. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #44's call light was within reach when he/she was indisposed and was unable to call for staff assistance for personal care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, revised October 2022 indicated the following the following resident rights: -to a dignified existence. -communication with and access to people and services both inside and outside of the facility. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses including repeated falls, abnormal gait and mobility, and Dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/11/24 indicated Resident #44: -had clear speech. -usually was understood and usually understands. -had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15. -had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three Residents (#33, #60, and #22) of five applicable residents reviewed, out of a total sample of 20 residents, had the opportunity to formulate advanced directives and/or ensure that their wishes relative to advances directives were implemented. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #33, ensure his/her wishes relative to advanced directives were ordered by the Physician putting the Resident at risk for medical treatment that he/she did not want. 2. For Resident #22, ensure that Advanced Directives were reviewed with the Resident to allow his/her wishes to executed. 3. For Resident #60, ensure that the completed MOLST form and Physician orders matched, creating the potential for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) to be performed when it was not the Resident's wishes. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Advanced Directives, revised [DATE], indicated advanced directives will be respected in accordance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify or consult with the Physician when staff did not follow the Physician's orders for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, for Resident #10, the facility staff failed to notify or consult the Physician when staff utilized a different sized Foley Catheter (a type of indwelling urinary catheter -a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine outside the body) than what the Physician ordered. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised 12/16/21, indicated the following: -Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of change in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. -The Nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or Physician on call when there has been a (an) .need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with diagnoses including urinary tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to resolve a grievance timely for one Resident (#40) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure for Resident #40 that a reported grievance of missing clothing was resolved in a reasonable time period. Findings include: Review of the undated Grievance Policy indicated the following: -The reasonable timeframe the resident can expect a completed review of the grievance is within 5 to 7 business days. -The grievance official shall be responsible to oversee the grievance process, receive and track grievances through their completion. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in October 2022, with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Review of Resident #40's MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the following: -the Resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a BIMS score of 15 out of a possible score of 15. Review of the Grievance Binder indicated: -a grievance form dated 6/25/24, reporting a missing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect one Resident's (#42) right to be free from neglect, out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide goods and services to Resident #42 relative to his/her request for a snack, resulting in Resident #42 attempting to exit the facility, wandering into other resident rooms, and displaying restlessness and agitation. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Policy, revised September 2022 indicated the following: -Neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, it's employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, revised October 2022 indicated the following: 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the residents' rights to: a. A dignified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to professional standards of practice on one unit (Willow) out of a total of two units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered to one resident at a time to mitigate the risk for medication errors. Findings include: Review of Lippincott Nursing Procedures 9th edition (2023), indicated the following: -Avoid distractions and interruptions when preparing and administering medication to prevent medication errors. During an observation on 1/7/25 at 8:46 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #1 with medications on a small black tray. The tray contained 3 medication cups and 3 drinks. The medication cups had no visible labels on the cups to indicate the resident the medication would be administered to. The surveyor observed Nurse #1 enter a room with the tray, administer one cup of medication and drink to a resident and then leave the room with 2 medication cups and 2 drinks remaining on the tray. During an observation and interview on 1/7/25 at 5:09…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming assistance for one Resident (#51), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #51 was assisted with facial hair removal when he/she required assistance from staff with personal hygiene. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Quality of Life- Dignity, revised August 2009, indicated each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect ad individuality. The policy also included the following: -Residents shall be groomed as they wish to be groomed . Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including Dementia with anxiety. Review of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan, initiated 1/11/23, indicated the Resident had a deficit related to activity intolerance, confusion, Dementia and impaired balance, and included the following intervention: -required one staff participation with personal hygiene, revised 1/17/23 Review of the Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain orders for wound treatments in accordance with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#49 and #56) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #49, ensure that hospital discharge recommendations for treatment of the Resident's skin condition were appropriately implemented placing the Resident at risk for worsening of the skin conditions. 2. For Resident #56, obtain a Physician order for wound treatments recommended by the Wound Doctor resulting in the Resident's sacral wound not being treated timely. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Skin and Wound Management System, revised September 2022, indicated the following: -Residents identified with skin impairments will have appropriate interventions, treatment and services implemented to promote healing and impede infection. 1. Resident #49 was admitted to the facility in October 2022, with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#117) out of a total sample of 20 residents, was free from potential accidents/hazards. The facility also failed to minimize risk of accident/hazards during medication pass on one of two units observed. Specifically, 1. For Resident #117, the facility failed to ensure one to one (1:1) direct supervision was provided during oral intake as ordered by the Physician, increasing the potential risk of choking and aspiration (food/fluids that enters the lungs). 2. On the [NAME] Unit, the facility failed to ensure that poured medications were maintained in a safe manner to prevent access to and accidental ingestion by residents for whom the poured medication was not intended to be administered. Findings include: 1. Resident #117 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses including Transient Cerebral Ischemic Attack (TIA), dysphagia and pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit. Review of the Hospital Discharge Note, dated 1/3/25, indicated the following: -Resident #117…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#4) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the correct oxygen flow rate was administered to Resident #4 as ordered by the Physician. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, revised October 2010, indicated the following in part: -Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. -Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. -Review the residents care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident -Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered period. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident #4's January 2025 Physician orders indicated the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that care and services for pain management consistent with professional standards of practice were provided for one Resident (#9) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide pain management interventions as ordered for Resident #9 when the Resident reported pain and was dependent on staff to receive as needed and scheduled pain medication and non-pharmacological measures to treat his/her pain. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pain - Clinical Protocol, revised March 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Assessment and Recognition 1. The physician and staff will identify individuals who have pain or are at risk for having pain. a. This includes reviewing known diagnosis and conditions that commonly cause pain; for example, diabetic neuropathy. b. It also includes a review for any treatments that the resident is currently receiving for pain, including complementary and non-pharmacologic treatments. -Treatment/Management 2. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate medical care and Physician supervision for one Resident (#12) out of a total sample of 20 Residents. Specifically, for Resident #12, the facility failed to ensure that the Provider was aware of the Resident's weight loss and management of his/her nutritional status. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, revised March 2019, indicated the following: -weights will be recorded in each individual's medical record. -any weight change of 5 pounds (lbs) or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will notify the physician and dietician. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following a Cerebral Infarction affecting the right dominant side. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #12 had moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident preferences were obtained and implemented by the facility kitchen for four Residents (#1, #56, #117 and #20) and resident council participants. Specifically, the facility failed to: -For Resident #1, provide food that accommodated the Resident's preferences. -For Resident #56, provide food and drink that accommodated the Resident's preferences. -For Resident #117, provide food that accommodated the Resident's preferences. -For Resident #20, provide food that accommodated the Resident's preferences. -provide food items that were appropriate and accommodated resident allergies, intolerances and preferences. -provide appealing substitutes of similar nutritive value. Findings include: During the initial pool process, conducted on 1/7/25, the residents had the following concerns relative to the facility food provided: -Resident #1 reported he/she had numerous food concerns about breakfast. The portions served were too small, he/she had told numerous staff and no one from the kitchen has come…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement antibiotic monitoring system for one Resident (#118) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, for Resident #118, who was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI) and started on antibiotics, the facility failed to ensure their antibiotic surveillance tracking form was updated and maintained to include all pertinent information relative to monitoring Resident #118's infection and use of antibiotics. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship-Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes, revised 12/2016, indicated the following: -Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. -All resident antibiotic regimens will be documented on the facility approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. Resident #118 was re-admitted to the facility post hospitalization in January 2025 with a diagnosis of UTI. Review of Resident #118's January 2025 Physician's orders indicated:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#60) out of a total sample of five residents reviewed for immunization, was screened for eligibility to receive the recommended pneumococcal vaccination, that the Resident and/or his/her Resident Representative was educated on the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccine, and were offered and administered (if applicable) the vaccine in a timely manner. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #60 was offered the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV-a vaccine that helps protect against diseases caused by pneumococcal bacteria) at the time of admission or shortly thereafter, putting the Resident at risk for developing facility acquired Pneumonia. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Infection Control Prevention, Control, and Antibiotic Stewardship, revised 7/22/22, indicated the following: -Each resident is offered a pneumococcal immunization, unless the immunization is medically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure screening for eligibility to receive the recommended COVID-19 vaccination, education on the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccine was provided to the Resident and/or Resident Representative, and COVID-19 vaccines were offered and administered (if applicable) in a timely manner, for two Residents (#4 and #60) out of a total sample of five Residents reviewed for immunizations. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: 1. Resident #4's Resident Representative was provided with information about the risks and benefits of COVID-19 immunization and completed a Consent or Refusal form when Resident #4's Health Care Proxy (HCP- person named to make medical decisions when the Resident can no longer make medical decisions as determined by a Physician) was activated, prior to Resident #4 being administered a COVID-19 vaccination. 2. Resident #60 was administered the most recent recommended COVID-19 vaccination in a timely manner after the Resident consented to receive the recommended COVID-19 vaccination.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that electrical bed equipment was maintained in a safe operating condition for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, for Resident #2, the facility failed to ensure that the bed remote control remained in safe working condition when the Resident's bed remote control cord that was currently in use was identified to be frayed with exposed electrical wires. Findings include: During an observation on 1/7/25 at 8:37 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #2 lying in bed with the bed remote control in his/her hand. The cord to the bed remote control was observed to be frayed with multicolored wires visible where the outer protective portion of the cord had separated. During on observation on 1/7/25 at 2:05 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #2's bed. The Resident was not in the bed. The bed remote control was laying at the foot of the bed and the cord to the remote control remained with a frayed outer protective layer with visible multicolored wires. During an interview on 1/7/25 at 2:17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Health Care Proxy had been activated in October of 2023, the Facility failed to maintain Resident #1's rights related to obtaining copies of medical record information, when his/her Health Care Agent (HCA) requested copies of documentation from his/her medical record, and did not receive those copies, in accordance with the regulation. Findings include: Review of the Facility Medical Record Reviews Policy, undated, indicated that the Facility maintained the confidentiality of each resident's personal and protected health information. The Policy indicated the resident or resident designee may initiate an oral or written request to access information contained in his/her records and charts and if the resident or resident designee wants a copy of the medical record, the facility shall provide the copy and may charge a reasonable fee for reproducing copies. Review of Resident #1's Medical Record indicated that he/she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, homelike environment on two units (Orchard Unit and [NAME] Unit) out of two units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the carpet was clean and in good repair throughout the main hallway and the resident care area. 2. Ensure mattresses used by the residents were in good condition. 3. Ensure a toilet in one resident room was adequately maintained for resident use. 1. On 11/5/23 at 8:30 A.M., the surveyor observed the wall-to-wall carpet that connected the [NAME] Unit to the Orchard Unit to have numerous black stains which continued throughout the Orchard Unit where residents resided. The black stained areas covered large areas of the carpeting and were too numerous to count. The surveyor also observed an area of carpeting near Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] that was cut around a metal circle approximately eight inches in diameter, which revealed exposed cement and the edges of the carpeting were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-08 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman when a resident was transferred from the facility for five Residents (#6, #40, #36, #50, and #57) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: During a pre-survey telephone interview on 11/3/23 at 1:53 P.M., the Ombudsman said she often did not receive notification when residents were transferred from the facility and that the last transfer notifications she had received were in March 2023. 1. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in August 2021. Review of the nursing progress note dated 6/6/23 indicated the Resident was transferred from the facility and admitted to the hospital. Further review of the Resident's medical record indicated no documentation the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman had been notified of the Resident's transfer. 2. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in October 2022. Review of the nursing progress note dated 2/14/23 indicated the Resident was transferred from the facility and admitted to the hospital. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespreadEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the Consultant Pharmacist recommendations were addressed timely for one Resident (#14) out of five applicable residents, from a total sample of 20 residents. 2. Develop a comprehensive Medication Regimen Review (MRR) policy. Findings include: 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - having intense, disturbing thoughts and feelings related to experience(s) that last long after the traumatic event has ended). Review of the Physician Order Summary Report printed on 11/8/23, indicated the following orders: - Quetiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet (otherwise known as Seroquel, an antipsychotic medication), give 200 milligrams (mg) by mouth in the evening for agitation, initiated 1/27/23, discontinued 2/4/23 - Quetiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet, give 200 mg by mouth at bedtime, initiated 2/4/23, discontinued 2/17/23 - Seroquel Oral Tablet 100 mg, give 1 tablet at bedtime for depression for five days, initiated 2/17/23 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. maintain the main kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent contamination and food-borne infections. 2. ensure that staff wore hair/beard restraints and used gloves appropriately in the food service area to prevent contamination. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oven Cleaning revised July 2023, indicated but was not limited to: -Ovens will be cleaned as needed and according to the cleaning schedule (at least once every week). Review of the facility policy titled, Cleaning and Sanitation of Food Service Areas, revised July 2023, indicated but was not limited to: -The food service staff will maintain the sanitation of the dining and food service areas through compliance with a written, comprehensive cleaning schedule. Review of the Kitchen Cleaning Schedule provided by the Food Service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-08 · tag F0941 — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to include effective communications as mandatory training for four out of four direct care staff. Specifically, the facility did not offer any communications training for staff that included using visual aids, body language communications and making adjustments to communication methods as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's General Orientation documentation for four out of four direct care staff members indicated no evidence the topic of effective communication was included in the mandatory training. During an interview on 11/8/23 at 1:31 P.M., the Administrator said the facility has not completed any training related to effective communication with direct care staff nor created any training related to communication with residents who do not speak or understand English. The Administrator further said that the facility does not offer cultural competencies staff. During an interview on 11/8/23 at 1:53 P.M., the Administrator provided a document titled, Culturally Competent Care (undated) that he said was used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident meals were palatable and served at appropriate temperatures on one Unit (Willow) out of two units observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Temperatures, revised 7/2023, indicated the following: -All hot food items must be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held and served at a temperature of at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F). -Foods should be transported as quickly as possible to maintain temperatures for delivery and service. (If food transportation time is extensive, food should be transported using a method that maintains temperatures (i.e. hot/cold carts, pellet systems, insulated plate bases and domes, etc.). -Foods sent to the units for distribution (such as meals, snacks, nourishments, oral supplements) will be transported and delivered to maintain temperatures at or below 41 degrees F for cold foods and at or above 135 degrees F for hot foods. During the initial screening process on 11/5/23, multiple residents on the [NAME] Unit voiced concerns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for the residents and staff in the facility laundry room. Findings include: During a tour of the laundry room on 11/7/23 at 8:25 A.M. with the Housekeeping Director, the surveyor made the following observations: -a damp musty smell upon entry into the laundry room. -between the washing machine room and the dryer room there were two buckets on a sheet collecting water that was leaking from the ceiling and/or pipes. -water damage staining the tile floor. -significant water damage to the ceiling that included brownish, orangish stains to a large area. -peeling paint on the pipes, along with a significant amount of rust on the pipes and the brackets holding the pipes to the ceiling. -areas of small black spots on the ceiling. -areas of white mineral build-up on the pipes. -areas of green oxidization on the sprinkler head. -the wooden door frame to the open doorway between the washing machine room and dryer room had areas of significant water damage and rot.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and records reviewed for one Resident (#36) out of a total sample of 20 residents, the facility failed to ensure that the physical environment met the Resident's needs. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident who was deemed at risk for falls, and with a history of falls, had access to his/her call bell at all times. Findings include: Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including unspecified abnormality of gait and mobility, and repeated falls. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment indicated the Resident had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15. Further review of the MDS Assessment indicated the Resident: -had a fall at the facility since admission or the prior assessment -required assistance with transfers -utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Review of the Resident's Fall Care Plan indicated the following: - Resident is at risk for falls, initiated 3/1/23. - Be sure the Resident's call light is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to re-submit a Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASARR requires that: 1) all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility be evaluated for serious mental disorder and/or intellectual disability, 2) be offered the most appropriate setting for their needs [in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting], and 3) receive the services they need in those settings) when it was identified that one Resident (#41) out of a total sample of 20 residents, had a serious mental illness. Finding include: Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in January 2021. Review of Resident #41's Level 1 PASARR dated 1/7/21, indicated the Resident had no diagnoses of serious mental illness which included a diagnosis of Schizophrenia (any type). Review of the Mental Health Provider note dated 2/3/21, indicated the Resident had a diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia. Further review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and records reviewed for one Resident (#116) out of a total sample of 20 residents, the facility failed to initiate baseline care plans within 48 hours, as required. Specifically, the facility failed to initiate a baseline care plan relative to the Resident's inability to speak or understand English. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Baseline Care Plan dated December 2016, indicated the following: -A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. -To assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident's admission. Resident #116 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses including Dementia, repeated falls, and Metabolic Encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood). Review of the Nursing admission Evaluation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed for one Resident (#50) out of a total sample of 20 residents, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a care plan relative to the Resident seeking of food and beverages that would be detrimental to his/her health, putting him/her at risk for aspiration (when something, such as food or liquid enters the airway or lungs by accident). Findings include: Resident #50 was admitted in July 2023 with diagnoses including Dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning to the extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities) and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following a Cerebral Infarction (stroke - when blood flow to the brain is disrupted due to problems with the blood vessels that supply the brain). Review of a Nursing Progress Note dated 7/10/2023, indicated the Resident was exit-seeking and was found going onto other units and in other rooms seeking food and drinks. Constant re-direction and supervision of the Resident was required. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a final discharge summary included, but not limited to, course of illness/treatment, reconciliation of medication, and any follow-up care arrangements/services, for one Resident (#63) out of two closed records reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Discharge Summary and Plan revised October 2022, indicated the following in part: -When a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and post-discharge plan is developed to assist the resident with discharge. -The discharge summary includes a recapitulation (summarization) of the residents stay at the facility and final summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge in accordance with established regulations governing release of resident information and as permitted by the resident. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with the following diagnoses: ileostomy (a surgical opening constructed by bringing the end or loop of small…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and records reviewed for one Resident (#116) out of a total sample of 20 residents, the facility failed to ensure that the necessary interventions were in place to meet the Resident's communication needs. Specifically, the facility failed to provide the Resident, who did not speak or understand English, a functional communication system to meet his/her needs. Findings include: Resident #116 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses including repeated falls, metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood) and Dementia. Review of the facility's policy titled, Translation and/or Interpretation of Facility Services dated May 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The facility's language access program will ensure that individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) shall have meaningful access to information and services provided by the facility. -When encountering LEP individuals, staff members will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to provide assistance for one Resident (#12), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to provide shower and grooming/ maintaining facial hair for a Resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with a diagnosis of Dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15, and is sometimes able to understand others as well as to be understood. Review of the ADL Care Plan initiated on 5/19/22 and updated on 8/19/22, indicated the following: -ADL Self-Care deficit due to confusion, Dementia, disease process and limited range of motion. -Resident is totally dependent of one person for ADL's, bathing, dressing, toileting and grooming tasks. On 11/5/23 at 9:42…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was free from possible hazards for two Residents (#44 and #50) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #44, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's bed remained free from gaps between the footboard and the mattress to reduce the risk for possible entrapment (when a person becomes trapped between the mattress and headboard, footboard, or bed rails on a bed) 2. For Resident #50, the facility failed to ensure his/her environment was free from easily accessible thin liquids when he/she was on a thickened liquid diet. Findings include: 1. Review of the Bed Rail Entrapment Zones sheet, undated, provided by the facility indicated Zone 7 is the zone between the head or foot board and the end of the mattress. Review of the Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, issued March 10, 2006 provided by the facility indicated: -Zone 7: is the space between the inside surface of the head board or foot board and the end of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed for one Resident (#14) out of a total sample of 20 residents, the facility failed to ensure that the oxygen concentrator (a device that pulls air from the room, and filters it into purified oxygen for breathing) was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner per professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident's oxygen concentrator was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for the Resident's use and to prevent equipment contamination. Findings include: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- a group of diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). Review of the facility policy titled Cleaning of Equipment, undated, included but was not limited to: -All respiratory therapy and oxygen equipment must be cleaned in order to prevent nosocomial infections (healthcare associated infections). -All equipment should be cleaned on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, for one Resident (#17) of five applicable residents, out of a total sample of 20 residents, the facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was attempted by the Physician for the Resident receiving a psychotropic medication. Findings include: Review of the Psychotropic Medication Prescribing Guidelines dated 8/2022, that was provided by the facility, indicated the following: -Within the first year: Must attempt a GDR in two separate quarters (with great than or equal to one month between attempts) unless clinically contraindicated. -Ongoing GDR assessment and documentation: During quarterly care plan meeting if not more often. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility in November 2022 with a diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder. Review of the Resident's November 2023 Physician's order indicated the following order: -Quetiapine Fumarate (an antipsychotic medication) Tablet 300 milligrams (mg). Give one tablet by mouth at bedtime. Review of the Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to ensure that complete and accurate medical records were maintained for two Residents (#40 and #44) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #40, the facility failed to ensure documentation for care plan meetings were completed. 2. For Resident #44, the facility failed to ensure documentation in the Resident's Care Plan and Physician's orders accurately matched the Resident's Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST-a medical order form that relays instruction between health professionals about a patient's care). Findings include: 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in October 2022. Review of the Resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment indicating he/she was cognitively intact. During an interview on 11/5/23 at 11:11 A.M., Resident #40 said he/she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, policy reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that two Resident's (#14 and #17) out of five sampled residents, was offered and administered the Pneumococcal Vaccine. Findings include: Review of the facility Infection Control, Prevention, Control and antibiotic Stewardship policy, revised on 7/22/22, indicated the following: -Pneumococcal disease --Each resident is offered a pneumococcal immunization, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated, or the resident has already been immunized --The resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates, at a minimum: that the resident either received the pneumococcal immunization or did not receive the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal. 1.Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in January 2023. Review of Influenza/Pneumococcal Immunization Consent or Refusal form signed on 1/27/23 by the Resident Representative indicated a checked box for: I do want to be given the Pneumococcal Vaccine. Review of the Physician's order dated 1/27/23 indicated:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$49,296 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $49,296 — penalty dated 2023-11-08
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $418K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225383. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.