Christopher House Of Worcester

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 257 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 31.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 126 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 156 beds and averages 141.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose comprehensive plan of care indicated he/she required the use of a Hoyer lift (mechanical mobility aid that supports a person's body weight to allow movement from one surface to another) with assistance of two staff members for all transfers, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed interventions in his/her care plan, when on 03/12/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 transferred Resident #1 from his/her wheelchair into bed with a Hoyer lift, without another staff member present to assist him. Resident #1 fell to the floor onto his/her knees then fell forward landing on his/her face. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) and diagnosed with a laceration, head injuries and fractures. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, Care Planning and Assessment of Resident, with a reviewed date of 11/14/19, indicated the purpose of the assessment is to identify the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required the use of a Hoyer lift (mechanical mobility aid that supports a person's body weight to allow movement from one surface to another) with assistance of two staff members for all transfers, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance to maintain his/her safety and prevent an incident/accident resulting in an injury, when on 03/12/24, while Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 transferred Resident #1 from his/her wheelchair into bed without another staff member present to assist him. Resident #1 fell to the floor onto his/her knees then fell forward landing on his/her face. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) and diagnosed with a head laceration, head injuries and multiple facial fractures. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Mechanical Lifts, with a revision date of 1/25/22, indicated the following: -To provide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for one Resident (#123), out of a total sample size of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #123, the facility staff failed to maintain the Resident's wheelchair in a clean and sanitary manner when the Resident was dependent on the wheelchair use for mobility and the wheelchair was visibly soiled. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Wheelchair Cleaning Policy, last reviewed 9/25/24, included but was not limited to:-to ensure the safety, hygiene, and functionality of all wheelchairs in use by maintaining a consistent cleaning schedule and accurate tracking system. -wheelchairs will be cleaned once per week at a minimum until all wheelchairs are completed.-additional cleanings may be performed as needed due to visible soiling, spills, or infection control requirements. -the Housekeeping/Maintenance Department is responsible for ensuring all wheelchairs are cleaned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments that accurately reflected the status of two Residents (#15 and #142) out of a total sample of 28 Residents.Specifically, for Resident #15, and Resident #142, the facility failed to ensure that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9: questionnaire used to assess for Depression) were completed, placing the Resident's at risk for care that is not Resident driven and unidentified Depression. Findings include:1) Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses including BiPolar Disorder and Mood Disorder. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #15: -was usually understood -usually understood others -BIMS assessment was not attempted -PHQ-9 assessment was not attempted During an interview on 8/26/25 at 9:04 A.M., Resident #15 appropriately understood and answered the surveyor's questions about his/her stay in the facility.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services as required for an indwelling urinary/Foley catheter for one Resident (#3) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #3, the facility failed to ensure that a blocked indwelling urinary catheter was replaced with the correct sized catheter balloon as ordered by the Physician. Findings include: Review of the facility policy for Urinary Catheters, last revised 11/1/23, indicated: -to ensure appropriate use of indwelling or intermittent urinary catheters once necessity has been determined .-Catheter Removal: >the Licensed Nurse checks Physician's order for.catheter>documents findings as indicated Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in June 2025 with diagnoses including neurogenic bladder and obstructive uropathy. Review of Resident #3 August 2025 Physician's orders indicated: -Foley catheter care every shift, start date 6/30/25-Foley catheter change as needed for leakage, blockage or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide trauma-informed care according to professional standards of practice and accounting for the Resident's experiences for one Resident (#6) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #6, the facility failed to:-assess the Resident for a history of trauma when the Resident was newly admitted to the facility.-recognize the Resident's experiences of traumatization when, during the Resident's stay at the facility, contracted Psychological Services identified that the Resident had a history of trauma, putting the Resident at risk for re-traumatization. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care, last reviewed 9/6/22, indicated the following:-It is the policy of the facility to ensure residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice.-Care will be provided while considering the residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and secured in accordance with State and Federal requirements on one unit (Brookside unit) medication carts, out of total of four units and that medications were stored in a safe and secure manner for one Resident (#3) out of a total sample of 28 residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:1. ensure that one medication cart on the Brookside Unit was locked while the Nurse walked away from the medication cart multiple times and the unlocked medication cart was out of her sight, providing ready access of medications in the medication cart to unauthorized personnel and residents.2.For Resident #3, ensure that a prescribed inhaler was secured and not left on the Resident's nightstand table that was readily accessible to other residents and/or unauthorized individuals. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications, revised 2024, included but was not limited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented medical records relative to fluid intake and urinary output for one Resident (#5) out of a total sample of 28 residents.Specifically, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate documentation of:1. Resident #5's fluid intake when the Resident was identified to have Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), required the use of diuretic medication, and was placed on fluid restriction.2.Resident #5's urine output when the Resident was identified to have CHF, was placed on fluid restriction, and the Resident had an indwelling urinary catheter, putting the Resident at risk for inadequate monitoring of his/her medical condition and fluid-related complications. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Intake and Output Assessment/Documentation, last revised 12/1/24, indicated the following:-The objective was to maintain adequate fluid balance.-The nursing staff will document intake and output in the EHR (electronic health record). Resident #5 was admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program to stop the spread of organisms and infections for one Resident (#52) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #52, the facility failed to ensure that staff performed appropriate hand hygiene during glove changes while providing wound care for Resident #52 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP: infection prevention practice of wearing gown and gloves to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms [MDRO's - bacteria that are resistant to three or more types of antimicrobial drugs]) during high contact resident care), placing the Resident at risk for contracting healthcare-associated infections. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Care, last revised 2/9/24, included but was not limited to: -to protect our residents, our staff follow evidenced-based infection prevention practices to minimize pathogen transmission during wound care.-The following practices should be incorporated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the Pneumococcal (bacterial infection caused by streptococcus pneumoniae/ pneumococci, that can range from ear and sinus infections to Pneumonia and blood stream infections) Vaccination was administered to two Residents (#35, and #81) for five applicable residents, out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1. identify whether Resident #35 was up to date with Pneumococcal Vaccinations, administer the Pneumococcal Vaccine when the Resident was not up to date, and determine whether he/she was eligible to receive the Pneumococcal Vaccine when the Resident/Representative consented to receive the vaccination. 2. identify whether Resident #81 was up to date with Pneumococcal Vaccinations, administer the Pneumococcal Vaccine when the Resident was not up to date, and determine whether he/she was eligible to receive the Pneumococcal Vaccine when the Resident/Representative consented to receive the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#130) of four applicable residents reviewed, out of a total sample of 29 residents, received care and services for his/her pressure ulcer (a wound, usually over a bony prominence, that is caused by unrelieved pressure to the area) in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a wound care recommendation from the hospital, that was approved by the facility Nurse Practitioner (NP) was implemented placing the Resident at risk for worsening of his/her pressure ulcer. Findings include: Resident #130 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses of Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer (a wound, usually over a bony prominence, that is caused by unrelieved pressure to the area and extends to muscle, tendon and or bone tissue), and Quadriplegia (paralysis, or inability to move below the neck including the arms and legs). Review of the Hospital After Visit Summary dated 5/29/24, for re-admission to the facility included a wound care recommendation to: -wash…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards in order to prevent the potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections within the facility for two Residents (#130 and #241), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specially, the facility failed to: 1) For Resident #130, ensure that staff performed hand hygiene after the removal of gloves during a dressing change procedure placing the Resident at risk for infection in his/her wound. 2) For Resident #241, ensure that staff: a) wore the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-items used to prevent the spread of infection such as gowns, gloves, face masks) and/or wore the required PPE correctly while caring for the Resident, placing others at risk for exposure to a communicable disease (a disease or infection that is easily spread from one individual to another). b) changed a urinary catheter drainage bag (a bag used to collect urine) after it had been disconnected from the Foley Catheter (a thin, flexible tube placed through the urethra [the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,512 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,512 — penalty dated 2024-03-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $13K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA