Odd Fellows Home of Massachusetts

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 90.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-12-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed, review of surveillance camera video footage and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who had moderate cognitive impairment, history of behaviors and was dependent on staff for care, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from physical and verbal abuse when on 12/06/23/23, during the day shift, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 was seen on video footage pulling Resident #1 backward out of the elevator, then he hit/slapped him/her on the left side of the back of his/her head/neck/face area, and can then be seen standing over him/her engaging verbally and physically as he moves his arms/hands in front of Resident #1's face. The altercation between Resident #1 and CNA #1 was witnessed by another resident and other staff members, who said CNA #1 was antagonizing and threatening Resident #1 and that he/she was visibly upset by the incident. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, dated as revised February 2023, indicated the following: -The Facility has the responsibility to ensure that each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-10-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the Resident's/Resident Representative's (RRs) choices for one Resident (#27), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to adequately assess Resident #27's acute change in condition and accurately monitor his/her food intake or fluid intake and fluid output when the Resident demonstrated frequent refusal of medications, had reduced food and fluid intake, had a history of constipation, and complained of abdominal pain, which resulted in rectal fecal impaction and hospitalization. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Change of Resident Condition, revised June 2020, included the following: -The purpose was to ensure timely communication of a resident's change in condition between nursing staff and the prescriber to better evaluate and manage residents in the facility and to thereby avoid transfer to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-10-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary nutrition and hydration treatment, services, assessment and monitoring for one Resident (#27) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: Provide necessary treatment and services to promote food and fluid consumption, and accurately monitor food and fluid intake for Resident #27 when the Resident was identified as having potential nutrition and swallowing problems. The facility also failed to assess and manage changes in the Resident's functional status pertaining to eating and drinking and an unidentified rectal fecal impaction (inability to evacuate large hard stool, most commonly found in the rectum), and provide required assistance from facility staff to eat and drink. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Intake and Output (I & O) Policy, undated, indicated: -The Nursing personnel would keep an accurate record of a resident's fluid balance when the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assist three Residents (#30, #62, and #88), with signed consents, out of a total sample of 19 residents, in obtaining routine dental care, increasing the Residents' risks for unidentified dental disease and deteriorating oral health.Findings include:Review of the facility's Dental Services Policy, last revised [DATE], indicated the following: -Residents and/or their responsible party are responsible for the selection of a dentist or dental service to be used by the resident for dental supervision while in the facility. -Residents are assisted in obtaining regular and emergency dental care through the dentist or the dental service indicated at the time of admission. -Each resident may have an annual oral examination by a licensed dentist, and this examination shall be recorded on the resident's record. Review of the American Dental Association (ADA) guidance titled Your Top Nine Questions About Going to the Dentist - Answered, dated 2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices to prevent transmission of infections for three Residents (#64, #13, and #32), out of a total sample size of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #64, to implement Contact precautions (the use of protective equipment such as gowns and gloves to prevent the spread of parasites from one person to another) in accordance with Resident's plan of care plan increasing the risk to other residents, staff and visitors for contracting scabies (tiny mites that burrow under a person's skin, lay eggs and trigger an allergic reaction that causes itching). 2. For Resident #13, to implement Contact Precautions when the Resident became symptomatic and tested positive for Clostridioides difficile (C. diff: a bacterium causing severe diarrhea and colitis), which increased the risk for transmission of C. diff among residents and staff. 3. For Resident #32, to ensure that Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs - the use of protective gowns and gloves during high…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for two Residents (#52 and #70), out of a total sample of 19 residents, on one unit (Second Floor-South) out of five units observed. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that: -Resident #52's bedroom floor was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. -Resident #70's bed frame, bed rail, mattress, floor mat and bedroom floor were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Findings include: Review of the facility's Resident Handbook, last revised 3/24/26, indicated: >Environment- The Healthcare Center must provide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment, allowing each resident the opportunity to use his/her personal belongings to the greatest extent, provide housekeeping and maintenance services, and assuring clean bath and bed linens that are in good repair. A. Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in December 2025 with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of the Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate vision care services for one Resident (#62), out of a total sample of 19 residents, increasing the Resident's risk for further deterioration of vision when the Resident, who was diagnosed with diabetes and hypertension, had bilateral cataracts and left eye blindness. Specifically, for Resident #62, the facility failed to schedule vision care appointments and ensure that the Resident was seen and received appropriate treatment to maintain vision abilities, when the Resident consented to and requested vision care services. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Ancillary Physician Services, revised 4/2024, included but was not limited to:-Routine and emergency Optometry services are available to meet the resident's health services by the resident's assessment and plan of care.-Routine and emergency Optometry services are provided to our residents through:>A contract agreement with a licensed optometrist that comes to the facility routinely.>Referral to the resident's personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#88), out a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #88, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for a baseline oxygen flow rate, oxygen titration liter flow range, and portable oxygen flow rate when the Resident was diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and dependence on supplemental oxygen use placing the Resident at risk for respiratory complications related to oxygen use.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen and Nebulizer Setup/Tubing Infection Control Policy & Plan, undated, included the following:*To provide guidelines to prevent the spread of health care acquired infections associated with respiratory therapy equipment and to prevent transmission of infections to residents and staff.-Oxygen Administration>A practitioner's order is required to initiate oxygen therapy, except in an emergency situation.>A practitioner's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer pneumococcal immunization to one Resident (#119), out of five applicable residents reviewed for pneumococcal immunization in a total sample size of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to offer pneumococcal immunization to Resident #119 who was at high risk for pneumococcal infection complications due to a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), had no evidence of prior pneumococcal immunizations in his/her medical record, and pneumococcal immunization had not been identified as medically contraindicated. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccinations, undated, included but was not limited to the following: -All residents are provided the opportunity and encouraged to receive the pneumococcal vaccinations. -Pneumococcal vaccine will be administered according to the latest guidelines from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health issued each year. -The program coordinator .will be responsible to research the medical record and history to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer COVID-19 immunization to one Resident (#119), out of five applicable residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination in a total sample size of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to offer COVID-19 immunization to Resident #119 who was at high risk for COVID-19 infection complications due to a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), had no evidence of prior 2025-2026 COVID-19 variant immunizations in his/her medical record, and COVID-19 vaccinations had not been identified as being medically contraindicated. Findings include: Resident #119 was admitted to the facility in November 2018 with diagnoses including COPD and Dependance on Supplemental Oxygen.Review of Resident #119's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/2/26, included but was not limited to the following: -the Resident's COVID-19 vaccination was not up to date. Review of Resident #119's March 2026 Physician's Orders indicated: -the Resident had an invoked Health Care Proxy (HCP- an appointed person to make health care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide and environment as free of accident hazards as possible for three Residents (#83, #35, and #53) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, facility failed to: 1. implement safe swallow strategies for Resident #83 when the Resident had a history of swallowing difficulty, oropharyngeal (middle part of the throat and back of the mouth) dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Dementia, and had an overall decline in function requiring dependence on staff for eating, which increased the Resident's risk for choking and/or aspiration (when food or liquids enters one's airway or lungs). 2. complete fall risk assessments for Resident #35 when the Resident was re-admitted to the facility following hospitalizations, including one hospitalization resulting from a fall with fracture that required surgical intervention, putting the Resident at risk for further falls, injury and abnormal bleeding resulting from anticoagulation (medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-10 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — pattern
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide routine dental services for one Resident (#46), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to schedule dental appointments when consent was given, to ensure that Resident #46 received routine dental services as requested, resulting in complications related to dental deterioration for the Resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dental Services dated 11/28/17, indicated but was not limited to the following: - residents are assisted in obtaining regular and emergency dental care through the dentist or dental services indicated at the time of the admission Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in January 2020, with diagnoses including Dementia and Dysphagia. On 12/4/24 at 10:29 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #46 lying in bed. The Resident was observed to have several missing and broken teeth in his/her mouth. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for one Resident (#35) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #35 with a wheelchair that was maintained in a clean manner and address promptly any cleaning needs as required. Findings include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses including Dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident was mildly cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 total possible points. On 12/4/24 at 8:30 A.M., Resident #35 was observed seated in a wheelchair next to the bed in his/her room eating his/her breakfast meal. The surveyor observed the wheelchair was dusty with crumbs and debris on the frame of the chair and cushion. During an interview at the time, Resident #35 said that he/she uses the wheelchair at times because he/she was worried…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$106,301 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $106,301 — penalty dated 2023-10-06
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-06 for 13 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA