Keswick Multi-Care Center
700 West 40th Street, Baltimore, MD 21211 · Non profit - Corporation · 242 certified beds · (410) 235-8860 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.2% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 22.8% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 46.7% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.8% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.1% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.2% | 5.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.6% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.4% | 13.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.9% | 80.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.8% | 21.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.9% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.38 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.92 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 802 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 363 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.5%CMS range 60.3–66.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 9.9–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 4.6%CMS range 2.9–7.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.68 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 242 beds and averages 156.4 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 86 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.61 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:Based on observation, record review, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service equipment in a manner that ensures sanitary food service operations to prevent possible foodborne illness. This was evident during the initial kitchen tour of the recertification survey. The findings include:A food-contact surface refers to any surface of equipment and utensils that typically comes into contact with food; or from which food may drain, drip, or splash onto food; or a surface that is usually in contact with food. Cross-contamination refers to the transference of harmful substances or pathogenic microorganisms to food by hands, food contact surfaces, sponges, cloth towels, kitchen equipment and/or utensils that have not been properly cleaned after contacting raw food and then touching ready-to-eat foods. Cross-contamination can also arise from inadequate dishwashing procedures that fail to effectively wash,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and facility staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have an accessible cord attached to the call light device in Resident bathrooms. This finding was found to be evident in 5 out of 34 Resident bathrooms observed on [NAME] Ground Nursing Unit which affected 5 (Resident #113, #115, #132, #161, and #172) out of 34 Residents reviewed for Resident Call System.The findings include:Resident Call Systems (nurse call systems) are essential communication tools in nursing homes that enable Residents to call for assistance via bedside stations, pull cords, or wireless pendants. These systems are critical for maintaining safety, independence, and fast emergency response for Residents.At 8:45 AM on 2/24/2026 upon touring the [NAME] Ground Nursing Unit the surveyor observed Resident bathrooms with a call light device on the wall next to the toilet. The call light device had no cord attached to the call light device on the wall for Resident #113, #115, #132, #161 and #172. In an interview with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a pest-free environment for the residents. This was evident in 6 of 6 areas reviewed during the recertification survey.The findings include:1) On 02/24/2026 at 7:50 AM, the surveyors noted the presence of fruit flies beneath the drainpipe of the coffee/tea preparation sink. 2) At 8:10 AM, the surveyors detected a live cockroach crawling on wall at the manual ware washing area.3) At 9:00 AM, the surveyors observed fruit flies in the vicinity of the dish machine hand sink, located in front of the chemical storage room.4) At 10:08 AM, a live cockroach was seen crawling on the floor of the laundry room by the surveyor. The Maintenance Director acknowledged the presence of the cockroach crawling near the laundry machine.5) At 10:30 AM, the surveyor returned to the kitchen janitor's closet with the Maintenance Director and the kitchen General Manager, where the light cover was found to have a significant number of dead insects. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility staff interviews and surveyor record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to document the offering and education of the formulation of an advance directive to Residents. This finding was found to be evident in 3 (Resident #144, #172 and #173) out of 9 Residents reviewed for advance directives.The findings include: Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is a portable, actionable medical document for patients with serious, advanced illnesses to document preferences for CPR, intubation, and other life-sustaining treatments. Signed by a clinician, it is effective immediately across all care settings, including EMS and home.Advance Directives are legally binding documents, such as living wills and durable powers of attorney for healthcare, that specify your medical preferences if you become unable to communicate. Advance Directives take effect upon incapacity, requiring signatures from witnesses or a notary. Key types include living wills and medical powers of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the environment of the resident was kept clean, comfortable and sanitary. This was evident for Resident #14 during the annual re-certifications survey. The findings include: On 02/25/2026 at 9:45 AM, during the initial observation of Resident #14's room revealed two items on the floor: a grey bed pan in the bathroom, located under the sink, and a blue surgical mask, which appeared to have been worn, in the corner of the room. On 02/25/2026 at 10:00 AM Staff #16, Unit Manager, Registered Nurse (RN) was shown the bed pan and the blue mask which appeared used on the floor. Staff #16, RN verbalized understanding that the above items being on the floor was an issue and called housekeeping to remove the items.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff and Resident interviews and surveyor record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to notify Residents/Resident Representatives in writing of the bed hold policy and document notification of the bed hold policy when Residents were transferred to the hospital. This finding was found to be evident in 2 (Resident #172 and #9) out of 5 Residents reviewed for discharge process. The findings include: Hemodialysis is a life-sustaining treatment for kidney failure that removes waste and excess fluid, typically taking 3-4 hours per session, 3 times a week. Dialysis is required when kidneys can no longer adequately filter waste and excess fluid from the blood. Blood is removed, filtered through an artificial kidney machine, and returned to the body. Arteriovenous fistula (AV fistula) is an abnormal, often surgically created, connection between an artery and a vein, allowing blood to bypass capillaries. Commonly used for hemodialysis in the arm. In an interview with Resident #172 on 2/24/2026 at 1:09 PM he/she stated that he/she received dialysis here at the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days of completion of the assessment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #133) of 3 residents reviewed for assessments transmission during the annual survey.The findings include:Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a core set of screening, clinical, and functional status data elements, including common definitions and coding categories, which form the foundation of a comprehensive assessment for all residents of nursing homes certified to participate in Medicare and Medicaid. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need.On 03/03/2026 at 10:00 AM a review of Resident #133's clinical record revealed that the resident was discharged on 11/11/2025. The MDS Assessment Discharge Return (ADR), Not Anticipated with ADR of 11/11/2025, was completed on 11/17/2025. However, the assessment was not transmitted to CMS.On 03/03/2026 at 12:00 PM during a telephone interview, MDS Consultant #22 reviewed Resident #133's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility staff interviews and surveyor record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set assessments (MDS) on Residents. This finding was found to be evident in 2 (Resident #26 and #171) out of 9 Residents reviewed for accurate coding of MDS assessments. The findings include:Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment is a federally mandated, standardized, comprehensive clinical assessment tool used in Medicare / Medicaid certified nursing homes to evaluate Residents' functional, medical and psychological status. Completed by interdisciplinary teams on admission, quarterly, annually, upon significant change and discharge. The MDS dictates care planning and reimbursement and is completed by trained clinical staff.Care Plan is a documented, living guide outlining a person's health, treatment goals, and necessary services, tailored to their physical, mental, and social needs. Created collaboratively by patients and providers, it includes medication lists, clear and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that interdisciplinary care plans were reviewed and revised following a change in condition related to Resident falls and Resident treatments. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #143 and #92) out of 4 Residents reviewed for care planning during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: On 02/24/2026 at 8:02 AM, during an interview, Resident #143 reported a recent fall during an interview. Resident #143 stated that while self-transporting to the bathroom via wheelchair, he/she fell and could not reach the call cord due to the distance. Resident #143 reported lying there for a period of time, calling out for help. The resident expressed that he/she is now experiencing increased discomfort and difficulty moving the left foot, which he/she feels is requiring more assistance with transport to the bathroom. On 03/02/2026 at 11:02 AM, a review of Resident #143's medical record revealed two documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure an ordered procedure necessitated an outside scheduled appointment was completed, and 2) properly assess, evaluate, and implement physician recommendations for treatment of skin impairments. This was evident for 3 (Resident #109, #22, and #166) of 11 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: According to the University of Maryland Medical System, a Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) is a fluoroscopic procedure designed to determine whether food or liquid is entering a person's lungs, also known as aspiration. It permits the medical team to observe the coordination of anatomical structures in the mouth and throat as they are actively functioning when chewing, drinking, and swallowing. 1) On 02/24/2026 at 11:54 AM, during an interview with Resident #109, he/she voiced concern that food sometimes gets stuck in his/her throat.On 02/25/2026 at 2:01 PM, a review of Resident #109's physician orders revealed an order dated 12/05/2025 to obtain a modified barium swallow study to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. As evidenced by not evaluating the effectiveness of treatment orders or timely and accurately assessing wounds. This was evident for 1 (Resident #109) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the annual survey. The findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), pressure ulcers (bed sores, pressure sores, or decubitus ulcers) are wounds from unrelieved pressure on the skin. They are staged by severity: Stage 1 is persistent skin redness; Stage 2 is partial thickness loss (abrasion, blister, or shallow crater); Stage 3 is full thickness loss exposing subcutaneous tissue (deep crater); and Stage 4 is full thickness loss exposing muscle or bone. An unstageable ulcer involves full-thickness skin and tissue loss where the extent of damage is obscured by slough or eschar.The standard of practice for the care of pressure ulcers is for the facility staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and surveyor record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide safe, appropriate respiratory care and services. This finding was found to be evident at the nursing station on [NAME] Ground Nursing Unit and in 2 (Resident #113 and #173) out of 2 Residents reviewed for usage of oxygen and storage of oxygen.The findings include: On 2/24/2026 at 9:57 AM the surveyor observed an emergency tank of oxygen (etank) at the nursing station on [NAME] Ground Nursing Unit. The etank was in an upright position and not secured in a stand or bracket.In an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #14 at 10:05 AM on 2/24/2026 the surveyor asked what the expectation was for storage of oxygen and showed RN #14 the etank that was standing upright, not secured, not in a stand at the nursing station. RN #14 stated who put that there and removed the etank to the oxygen storage room.On 2/24/2026 at 11:20 AM the surveyor observed Resident #113 in no distress sitting in the chair in Resident room with oxygen cannula (tubing) in his/her nostrils. Observed in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to respond to recommendations made by consulting pharmacists in a timely manner. This was true for (Resident #13) reviewed during the annual re-certification survey.The findings include:On 02/27/2026 at 1:15 PM: The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed about the Medication Regime Review (MRR) process. The DON stated that monthly MRRs are emailed by the pharmacist, printed, and followed up on by the nursing team or physician. New orders are then updated, placed in Point Click Care (PCC), and the recommendation is uploaded to PCC. Once the physician updates the recommendations, the changes are sent back to the pharmacist via medical records.03/02/2026 at 1:00 PM: Resident #13's MRR, dated 6/28/2025, was reviewed. The review indicated that the recommendations to increase Allopurinol and decrease Tiotropium were not addressed in a timely manner. Staff #15, a Registered Nurse and Unit Manager, signed the 6/28/2025 MRR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility staff interviews and surveyor record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician medication order for a Resident, failed to provide adequate side effects monitoring for Residents on psychotropic medications, and failed to ensure a Resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication as evidenced by medical records lacking physician documentation of rationale for continued as needed psychotropic use, no documented monitoring of side effects, and no documented non-pharmacological interventions prior to medication administration. This finding was found to be evident in 4 (Resident #26, #33, #92 and #7 ) out of 5 Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: Medication Administration Record (MAR) is a legal and essential document used by healthcare professionals to track, verify, and record all administered, missed or refused doses of medication, ensuring patient safety and regulatory compliance. The MAR includes patient information, medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to assist a resident to obtain routine dental care. This was evident for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 residents reviewed for dental services.The findings include:During an interview on 02/25/2026 at 7:26 AM Resident #2 stated that his/her teeth needed cleaning and that he/she had been waiting for 6 months for the facility to make an appointment. On 02/27/2026 at 8:00 AM a review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed the following:A progress note by the physician dated 10/01/2025 stated . The patient also request to follow-up with a dentist at the dental school. Patient requests appointment.A Physician's Order dated 10/01/2025 stated Refer to (Name) dental school for dental cleaning per resident request.A progress note by the physician dated 01/14/2026 stated . The patient also is pending follow-up with a dentist. The patient is not aware of an appointment yet.A progress note by the psychotherapist dated 02/06/2026 stated . client is just wanting to get into his dental appointment. client said I've…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the appropriate maintenance of the exterior trash compactor to prevent the harborage and infestation of pests. This was evident for 1 of 1 exterior trash compactor reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include:On 02/24/2026 at 10:50 AM, the surveyor evaluated the external dumpster area with the Maintenance Director. The trash compactor was situated at the far end of the open loading dock, approximately 24 feet (equivalent to 2 standard loading bays) from the rear doors of the kitchen and about 6 feet from the central storage room doors where the emergency water supplies were stored. The cemented surfaces surrounding the trash compactor and beneath it were found to be unclean, exhibiting waste leaks and debris. In addition, several wooden pallets were propped against the side wall. The surveyor emphasized the importance of maintaining cleanliness in these areas to avoid the attraction of pests and insect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices. This finding was found to be evident in review of a complaint related to linen availability, usage and storage in the facility during the annual recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: On 2/24/2026 at 12:07 PM the surveyor observed the clean linen cart on the [NAME] Ground Nursing Unit in the hall next to Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The clean linen cart was sufficiently stocked with wash clothes and linen, but the clean linen cart was observed uncovered. Two staff members were observed obtaining linen from the uncovered clean linen cart.In an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) employee #14 at 12:12 PM on 2/24/2026 the surveyor asked what the expectation was for the clean linen cart. Employee #14 observed the clean linen cart and proceeded to cover the linen cart with the tan-colored plastic cover that was attached to the clean linen cart and stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in proper operating conditions. This was evident for 3 of 3 pieces of equipment reviewed during the recertification survey.The findings include:All essential kitchen equipment, including but not limited to walk-in coolers, chef base drawer refrigerators, steam tables, dishwashers, convection ovens, stoves, and warming cabinets must be maintained in safe operating conditions in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and remain accessible throughout kitchen operations. On 02/24/2026 at 8:30 AM, the following kitchen equipment was determined to be nonfunctional according to the manufacturer's specifications:1) The steam table located on the cookline. This unit was being used as a prep table, with steam wells used for storing paper products.2) The Chef Base 4-drawer refrigerator situated on the cookline. Cooking equipment were placed on top of this unit.3) The solid interceptor located beneath the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, facility document, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect a resident from verbal abuse for 1 (Resident #6) of 8 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Prevention and Reporting of Abuse and Neglect, revised 10/2024, indicated, [Facility Name] has a zero tolerance for resident/patient abuse and neglect in any of it's [sic] forms. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #6 on 03/15/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of cerebrovascular disease, depression, dementia, and chronic kidney disease. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/28/2024, revealed Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #6 felt down, depressed, or hopeless, seven to eleven days during the assessment's lookback period. The MDS revealed the resident felt tired or had little energy for two to six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, facility document and policy review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown source within two hours of being informed that the resident sustained a serious bodily injury for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Prevention and Reporting of Abuse and Neglect, revised 10/2024, indicated, [Facility Name] has a zero tolerance for resident/patient abuse and neglect in any of it's [sic] forms. The policy revealed, 3. Abuse Reporting a. The facility will report allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, misappropriation of resident property, as well as injury of unknown origin, in accordance with regulatory reporting guidelines: i. abuse and serious bodily injury within 2 hours to state agencies, unless; ii. the alleged violation involves neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property; and does not result in serious bodily injury; which will be reported no later than 24 hours.* iii. The police department (911) will be notified of all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations of the facility's kitchen, review of kitchen records, and interview of dietary staff it was determined the facility failed to: 1) ensure all dietary staff wore a hair restraint, 2) ensure stored foods were covered and labeled, and 3) ensure the dishwasher was maintaining the minimum wash temperature for sanitization of dishes. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1) On 10/7/24 at 7:51AM surveyors conducted an initial tour of the facility's kitchen. On 10/7/24 at 7:54AM surveyors observed Dietary Aide #30 at the serving line plating food with no hair restraint covering exposed hair. At this time the surveyor conducted an interview with Dietary Aide #30 who stated the following to the surveyor regarding not wearing a hair restraint for exposed hair: I'm sorry, it must have come off. At this time, Dietary Aide #30 was observed obtaining a hairnet. On 10/7/24 at 8:19AM the surveyor conducted an interview with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) #31 who confirmed with the surveyor that their expectation was for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to accurately address reporting timeframes for allegations of abuse in their facility policies. This was evident during the surveyor's review of a facility reported incident, MD#00188565 and has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 10/7/24 at 8:45AM surveyors requested the facility's abuse prohibition policy and procedures from the facility's Administrator during the entrance conference, and the policies and procedures were provided shortly thereafter. On 10/8/24 at 11:46AM the surveyor began review of facility reported incident MD#00188565 which involved an allegation of abuse that had not been reported to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) within the required reporting timeframe. On 10/15/24 at 11:54AM the facility's Administrator was interviewed regarding abuse reporting time frames during the investigation of additional facility reported incidents (MD#00200867 and MD#00181354) which both included an allegation of abuse not reported to OHCQ within the required reporting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility reports, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) report misappropriation of a residents' fund, and 2) report an allegation of abuse within 2 hours of the allegation to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 4 (#75, #310, #69, #93) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 10/07/24 10:46 AM, Resident #75 was observed lying in bed with an elastic blue tie wrapped around his/her right arm with a key attached to it. Resident #75 stated that he/she used it for his/her locked drawer for his/her valuables. The surveyor asked Resident #75 about the missing money, he/she stated that last year his/her money went missing and could not remember the details. On 10/18/2024 at 10:43 AM, a review of MD00197124 and facility investigation documentation indicated that Resident #75 reported to the facility on 9/18/2023 that he/she was missing $200.00 from his wallet. He/she had just returned from a hospital visit on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's call device was accessible to the resident. This was evident for 1 (#145) out of 2 residents reviewed for call device functioning during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 10/7/24 at 8:58AM, during the surveyor's initial tour of the facility, Resident #145 was observed sitting on the side of their bed with their call device attached to the side rail of the bed, which was in the down position. The resident's call device was observed resting on the floor underneath their bed. The surveyor observed the bedside table situated between the resident and where the call bell was laying on the floor. At this time, the resident was observed to be unable to reach their call device. On 10/7/24 at 9:01AM surveyors conducted a dual observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #27 to observe the concern. At this time, upon surveyor's sharing of the concern, LPN #27 observed the resident did not have their call device within reach and proceeded to pick the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of a facility reported incident (MD #188565), record review and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to take measures to protect the resident during an abuse investigation. This was evident for 1 (Resident #310) out of 6 residents reviewed for abuse during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 10/8/24 at 11:46AM the surveyor conducted a review of the facility's investigation file for the facility reported incident MD#188565. During this review, it was noted that Resident #310 reported an allegation of abuse on 2/1/2023 to dialysis staff who then reported the allegation via email to the facility's Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and the [NAME] President of Clinical Services on 2/1/2023 at 2:34PM. Review of the email response to the dialysis staff from the [NAME] President of Clinical Services revealed the facility was aware of the allegation on 2/1/23 at 2:38PM. Documentation of the allegation reported to the facility included the alleged abuse occurred for the past two nights On 10/16/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of completion and create a discharge assessment. This was evident for 3 (Residents #64, #146 and #148) of 3 residents reviewed for resident assessments during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a core set of screening, clinical, and functional status data elements, including common definitions and coding categories, which form the foundation of a comprehensive assessment for all residents of nursing homes certified to participate in Medicare or Medicaid. The data elements (also referred to as items) in the MDS standardize communication about resident problems and conditions within nursing homes, between nursing homes, and between nursing homes and outside agencies. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. Nursing homes are required to submit the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) required MDS records for all residents in Medicare or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document oral assessment in a resident's medical record and code the resident's oral status accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #12) of 3 residents reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a core set of screening, clinical, and functional status data elements, including common definitions and coding categories, which form the foundation of a comprehensive assessment for all residents of nursing homes certified to participate in Medicare or Medicaid. The data elements (also referred to as items) in the MDS standardize communication about resident problems and conditions within nursing homes, between nursing homes, and between nursing homes and outside agencies. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. On 10/07/24 at 11:07 AM, Resident #12 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to develop, initiate, and ensure a care plan for a resident was comprehensive and person centered. This was evident for 3 (#50, # 312, #12) of 58 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 10/7/24 at 8:35AM, during the surveyor's initial tour, Resident #50 was observed in bed with two lower extremity prosthesis present on the floor within their room. On 10/8/24 at approximately 8:55AM the surveyor observed Resident #50 wearing their prosthesis. On 10/9/24 at 8:59AM the surveyor reviewed the medical record which revealed the following medical order for therapy that included prosthetic training: recertification for 9/26: PT to continue PT treatment x 2 visits/week x 30 days for therapeutic exercise, therapeutic activity,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on residents' representative interviews, resident record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an interdisciplinary care plan with effective interventions to prevent the repeated removal of gastronomy tubes. This was evident for one (Resident #68) of 58 residents reviewed for care plans during the recertification/complaint survey process. Findings Include: A gastronomy tube (g-tube) is inserted through the abdomen's wall into the stomach. The g-tube allows air and fluid to leave the stomach and can be used to give medication and fluids to the resident. On 10/8/2024 at 11:51 AM, an interview with Resident #68's representative revealed that the resident had 5 incidents that required multiple g-tube replacements within an approximate 5-month period. On 10/9/2024 at 10:52 AM, a review of Resident #68's record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in December 2019, and the resident's g-tube was placed before admission. A review of the change in condition assessment forms revealed that the resident had multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) follow professional standards of nursing practice when administering medications to residents and 2) administer the correct ordered medication form to the resident. It was evident for 1(Resident # 318) of 3 residents reviewed during medication administration during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: There are risks associated with opening capsules to drain the liquid. When this is performed, it alters the way the drug is absorbed in the body. This can result in people not getting enough dose. [Healtline.com February 2020] PAXIT is a 24-hour, unit-dose, medication management system in long-term care and it comes in easy to open bags. Omega 3 capsule is a dietary supplement made of gelatin and may have an enteric coating to prevent them from dissolving until they reach the small intestine. They are often tasteless and easy to swallow. Docusate Sodium is a medication utilized for managing and treating constipation. 1) On 10/16/24 at 8:51 AM, Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a complaint incident MD00209605, record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for a dependent resident. This was evident for 1 (resident #66) of 4 residents reviewed for ADL care during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 10/08/24 at 8:17 AM review of a complaint incident MD00209605 sent in by resident's family reported that resident #66 has been in the facility for over 45 days and never received a full shower/Bathing. Review of the Physicians order on 10/10/24 at 11:43 AM had an order dated 7/11/24 that read: Skin Assessment: Bath Days on Monday and Thursday every evening shift. Review of the MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/15/24 revealed that resident #66 was coded as depended for showers and baths. Review of the GNA task sheet from July to October 2024 revealed that resident #66 did not get a shower on the assigned shower days, only bed baths. In an interview with staff #24 a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) on 10/11/24 at 9:51 AM, she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of residents' medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for one (Resident #165) out of one resident who was reviewed for quality of care/ treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: STAT means right now. The term STAT is usually used in medical orders. STAT term derived from the Latin word Statim, which translates to immediately, and denotes that medical order should be prioritized. A medical record review on 10/08/24 at 03:04 PM revealed that resident #165 sustained a fall on 09/03/23 around 8 PM, and the resident complained of a sharp radiating pain in the left leg, a pain level of 9/10. After pain progressively increased, on 09/04/2023 at 00:40, health status notes by Registered Nurse # 43 indicated that Resident #165 complained of 10/10 left leg pain. Resident #165 stated: It hurts right on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a complaint investigation, record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to order appropriate intervention and treatments for the maintenance of a Urostomy. This was evident for 1 (Resident #164) of 1 resident reviewed for urostomy during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings Include: A urostomy is an opening in the belly made during surgery to redirect urine away from a bladder that's not working as it should. A special bag called urostomy bags are used to collect urine from the urostomy. On 10/15/24 at 9:38 AM, review of a complaint incident MD00194576 revealed that Resident #164, who had a urostomy, complained that her urine bag was leaking near the surgical wound and that the bag was left full of waste from 5:30 AM to 10:30 AM. Further, the urine bag leaked everywhere when the resident attempted to walk and that this had happened more than once. Review of the resident's record on 10/15/24 at 9:42 AM revealed that this resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident was given pain medication consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #16) of 4 residents reviewed for pain management during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include During an initial pool screen of Resident #16 on 10/7/2024 at 1:30 PM, the resident stated that s/he was always in pain and the pain medication was not given most of the time. Resident #16 further stated that sometimes s/he waited for a long time for the nurse to bring their pain medication. S/he added that the pain was in their stomach, knees, and legs. Review of Resident #16's clinical records on 10/9/2024 at 12:37 PM revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility in October 2024 with medical diagnoses that included but not limited to Chronic pain syndrome, unspecified Abdominal pain, and Prostate cancer. On 10/9/2024 at 1:02 PM, a review of active physician orders for Resident #16 revealed PRN (as needed) pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to administer the correct ordered medication form to the resident. It was evident for 1(Resident #318) of 3 residents reviewed during the medication administration during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: PAXIT is a 24-hour, unit-dose, medication management system in long-term care and it comes in easy to open bags. Omega 3 capsule is a dietary supplement made of gelatin and may have an enteric coating to prevent them from dissolving until they reach the small intestine. They are often tasteless and easy to swallow. Docusate Sodium is a medication utilized for managing and treating constipation. On 10/16/24 at 8:51 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #7), was observed preparing the medications of Resident #318. LPN #7 stated that Resident #318 took medications crushed. LPN #7 began popping the residents' medications from the blister packs, crushed and placed them in a small cup. He/she then proceeded to get an amber yellow semi-transparent gel capsule from a white…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident was free from unnecessary antibiotic use. This was evident for 1 (Resident #19) of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use while performing infection control tasks during the recertification/complaint survey. Findings Include: According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is a disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It can be very contagious and can spread quickly. The FDA has authorized or approved several antiviral medications to treat mild to moderate COVID-19 in people who are more likely to get very sick. Antiviral medications target specific parts of the virus to stop it from multiplying in the body once someone is infected, helping to prevent severe illness and death. On 10/15/24 at 08:35 AM, in an interview with Infection Preventionist RN (RN#26), the surveyor asked how the facility monitored antibiotic administration. RN #26 stated that the facility has an antibiotics stewardship program to monitor the unnecessary use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on environmental observation, record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system to prevent and control infections for all residents, staff, volunteers and visitors by posting precaution signs in front of residents' rooms to prevent the transmission of infections. This is evident for 3 (Resident #66, #68, #85) of 32 residents reviewed for infection precaution signs during the recertification/complaint survey. Findings include: According to the Center for Disease Control Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds, or indwelling medical devices such as central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes and tracheostomies). On 10/10/2024 at 09:03 AM, an environmental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have documented evidence to support that the facility assessed the vaccination status of the influenza and Pneumococcal of each resident as required. This is evident for 3 (Resident #16, #127, and #152) of 5 randomly selected resident records reviewed for the influenza and pneumococcal vaccination records during the recertification/complaint survey. Findings Include: Influenza (Flu) vaccines are used to help prevent influenza. Influenza (Flu) is a contagious disease that spreads around the United States every year, usually between October and May. Anyone can get the flu, but it is more dangerous for some people. Infants and young children, people 65 years and older, pregnant people, and people with certain health conditions or a weakened immune system are at the greatest risk of flu complications (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention- vaccines and preventable disease). Pneumococcal vaccines are used to help prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have documentation to support that the facility provided COVID-19 vaccine education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects of the vaccines. This is evident for 1 (Resident #129) of 5 randomly selected residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination records during the recertification/complaint survey. Findings Include: On 10/11/24 at 12:51 PM, a review of Resident #129's vaccination records revealed that upon the resident's admission in March 2023, the resident refused the COVID-19 vaccine; however, a review of Resident #129's immunization report in the electronic medical record, documented the vaccination education for the COVID-19 as no. Thus, revealed that the vaccination education was not provided to the resident or their representative. On 10/15/24 at 08:35 AM, in an interview with Infection Preventionist Nurse (Staff#26), she stated that the facility's routine was to give the residents the opportunity to be vaccinated, and that education was routinely provided at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide care to promote the highest well-being for Residents (#106, #161 and #172). This was evident for 3 of 69 residents selected for review of quality of care during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure a laboratory blood test for Resident #106 was appropriate. Medical record review for Resident #106 revealed the resident had been administered the blood thinning medication Coumadin for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Deep vein thrombosis, or DVT, is a blood clot that forms in a vein deep in the body. Most deep vein clots occur in the lower leg or thigh. A deep vein thrombosis can break loose and cause a serious problem in the lung, called a pulmonary embolism. A common treatment to prevent blood clot formation is the administration of a blood thinner. Coumadin is used to treat blood clots (such as in deep vein thrombosis-DVT or pulmonary embolus-PE) and/or to prevent new clots from forming in your body. For persons taking the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Residents (#122) with the most dignified existence related to meals. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity during the survey process and 1 of 69 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: Surveyor observation of Resident #122's breakfast revealed on 8/12/19 at 8:06 AM the resident's tray was in the room. It was noted, the lid was off the bottom plate with scrambled eggs and muffin exposed. The resident noted to be sleeping and not eating. There were no noted staff in the room at the time. Further observation revealed the facility staff nurse #8 entered the room at 8:42 AM and started to feed the resident; however, the facility staff failed to re-heat the food for Resident #122 after the food had been sitting in the room for at least 36 minutes prior to being fed. Although Resident #122 was noted to be eating, the most dignified manner would have been to either re-heat the food to be more palatable or obtain a new tray. Interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the physician of weight gain as ordered for Residents (#45 and #172). This was evident for 2 of 2 residents selected for review of notification and 2 of 69 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Congestive heart failure (CHF): Inability of the heart to keep up with the demands on it, with failure of the heart to pump blood with normal efficiency. When this occurs, the heart is unable to provide adequate blood flow to other organs, such as the brain, liver, and kidneys. It is important to monitor the weight because: weight gain is the first sign that heart failure is getting worse and residents can gain up to 10 pounds of extra weight from fluid before feeling bad or swelling. If you gain more than 3 pounds in one day or 5 pounds in one week, call the doctor as the normal standard of CHF protocol. 1. The facility staff failed to notify the physician of a weight gain for Resident #45 as ordered. Medical record review for Resident #45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation and resident interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 8/7/2019 at 8:33 AM Room C104 was observed with a large, dried urine stain on the toilet seat in the bathroom. Further investigation of this unit revealed that Resident #179 in Room C136 was using a wheelchair with a torn right armrest rendering it not easily cleanable. The armrest was observed to be loosely mounted to the wheelchair and wobbled when touched. On 8/8/2019 at 8:34 AM during an interview with Resident #184 multiple bug traps were observed in the residents room with accumulated dirt and debris stuck to them. The Administrator, Director of Nursing and [NAME] President of Resident Services were made aware of these findings on 8/15/2019 during the exit conference.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to code the Resident (#172) medications accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS). This was evident for 1 of 69 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Long-Term Care Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a health status screening and assessment tool used for all residents of long-term care nursing facilities certified to participate in Medicare or Medicaid, regardless of payer. The Long-Term Care Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized, primary screening and assessment tool of health status which forms the foundation of the comprehensive assessment for all residents of long-term care facilities certified to participate in Medicare or Medicaid. The MDS contains items that measure physical, psychological and psycho-social functioning. The items in the MDS give a multidimensional view of the patient's functional capacities and can be used to present a nursing home's profile. The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gathers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission to the facility. This was evident for 1 (Residents #407) of 69 residents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Review of Resident #407's medical record on 8/13/19 revealed Resident #407 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation that a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission and a copy was provided to the resident/resident representative. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan and provide the resident/resident representative with a copy within 48 hours of admission to the facility. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/13/19 at 12:26 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2) On 8/14/2019 Resident #184's medical record was reviewed and revealed and Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission Assessment from 8/29/2018. An MDS Assessment is a comprehensive assessment of a residents functional capabilities and health needs and are completed upon admission, discharge, quarterly, annually and when the resident experiences a significant change in condition. The MDS from 8/29/2018 specified that Resident #184 required Two + persons physical assist when bathing. Resident #184's Care Plan from 8/31/2018 was reviewed and under interventions for bathing/showering stated The resident requires (one staff assistance) with (bathing/showering) and as necessary. contrary to the resident's admission MDS assessment which specified Two + persons physical assist. The findings were discussed with the Administrator, Director of Nursing and [NAME] President of Resident Services during the exit conference on 8/15/19. Based on review of the medical record and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to 1)accurately develop a comprehensive anxiety care plan for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to have an interdisplinary team review and revise a care plan (#63). This was evident for 1 of 11 residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Resident #63 has a swallowing problem or dysphasia, recent weight loss, dementia and is ordered 1:1 supervision for eating assistance. On 6-2-19 Resident #63 weighed 154 lbs and on 8-6-19 132 lbs, a -14.29% weight loss. Resident #63 required speech therapy to identify the swallowing problem and provide swallowing strategies. Resident #63 is totally dependent on the facility for care. On 6-12-19 during the quarterly care plan meeting Resident #63 had 2 family members present, facility social worker, recreational therapy representative and the unit manager. The facility failed to have a dietitian and speech therapist attend and others to address the current problem of weight loss and swallowing concern. On 8-9-19 at 10:30 AM the Director of Nursing confirmed that the 6-21-19 care plan meeting did not include a dietitian or a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer a medication to Resident (#103) in accordance with the standard of practice. This was evident for 1 of 6 residents observed for medication pass and 1 of 36 opportunities for medication error. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #103 revealed on 5/23/19 the physician ordered: Breo Ellipta Aerosol Powder 200-25, 1 puff every day. Once-daily BREO 100/25 is a prescription medicine used long term to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or both, for better breathing and fewer flare-ups. BREO is not used to relieve sudden breathing problems and won't replace a rescue inhaler. BREO can cause serious side effects, including: fungal infection in the mouth or throat (thrush). Rinse the mouth with water without swallowing after using BREO to help reduce the chance of getting thrush. Observation of medication pass on 8/13/19 at 8:30 AM revealed Certified Medicine Aide #22 administered the BREO inhaler to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressure ulcers to (Resident #407). This is evident for 1 of 5 Residents selected for review of pressure ulcers during the survey process. A pressure ulcer (also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer) is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according to their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II (superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister, or shallow crater), Stage III (full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), and Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone, or tendon). The findings included: Resident #407 was admitted from the hospital on 3/5/19 without any pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #407's medical record revealed a BRADEN scale assessment for predicting pressure sore risk. The Braden Scale is an evidenced-based tool, that predicts the risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the nursing staff failed to follow physician orders and the established care plan to provide 1:1 supervision during meals to prevent a choking hazard (Resident #63). This was evident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for accident hazards. Findings included: On 8-8-19 at 8:30 AM Resident #63 who has dementia and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty) was observed in his/her room in bed with a carton of milk, water in a cup, and a red liquid in a plastic glass on the overbed table. Each item had a straw. Resident #63 was trying to drink the milk but unable to hold the carton due to arthritis in the hands and spilled the milk. On 8-9-19 at 8:25 AM Resident #63 was observed in her bed, asleep, and sitting up with the breakfast tray set on the overbed tray. On 8-8-19 at 9:20 AM a medical record review revealed physician orders for 1:1 supervision for meals and a care plan for 1:1 supervision for meals. On 8-6-19 when the speech therapist discharged Resident #63, the orders to the nursing staff were to use safe swallowing strategies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide nutritional services to Residents (#122 and #188) as ordered. This was evident for 2 of 11 residents selected for review of nutrition and 2 of 69 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #122 with supplements as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #122 revealed on 3/20/19 the dietician in collaboration with the physician ordered: house shake, 4 ounces 3 times a day with meals and magic cup, 4 ounces 3 times a day between meals. House shake provides added calories and protein and is fortified with vitamins and minerals. Magic Cup is a 4 oz frozen cup that provides 290 calories and 9 grams of protein. Surveyor observation of the resident's breakfast on 8/7/19 at 8:00 AM and 8/12/19 at 8:10 AM revealed the facility staff failed to provide dietary services as ordered by the physician. It was noted at that time Resident was served both the house shake and magic cup…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to clarify a pain medication order (Resident#69) to specify where the pain patch should be administered. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents selected for pain assessment and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pain management. The findings include: Resident #63 has pain in his/her right shoulder and lower back. On 3-4-19 an order was written to apply a lidocaine patch 5% to affected areas topically in the morning for pain. On 8-9-19 at 8:10 AM LPN #26 was asked how he/she knew where to apply the lidocaine patch? LPN #26 said Resident #69 would tell him/her where to place the patch. LPN #26 was then asked what they would do if Resident #69 had pain in the right shoulder and the lower back and answered, well, I guess I would call the doctor. The facility failed to specify what the affected area was for the lidocaine patch so the order was clear for any staff passing medications. On 8-9-19 at 10:00 AM the Director of Nursing confirmed the unclear order for pain medication.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to act upon the consultant pharmacist recommendation in a timely manner for Residents (#4) and the consultant pharmacist failed to conduct a thorough medical record review to identify and bring to the facility staff's attention Resident (#172) receiving Nystatin cream for 4 months. This was evident for 2 of 6 residents selected for unnecessary medication review during the annual survey process and 2 out of 69 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to act upon the consultant pharmacist recommendation in a timely manner. Medical record review for Resident #4 revealed the Consultant Pharmacist was in the facility on 1/23/19 and made a recommendation for Resident #4 related to the resident receiving very little insulin doses related to finger sticks. Finger stick uses a lancet which lightly pricks the skin to obtain the blood and a meter displays the current blood sugar. The physician determines the amount of insulin to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff administered pain medication to a resident who was not in pain (#124). This was evident for 1 resident out of 5 reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A review of Resident #124's clinical record revealed that the resident had an order for Oxycodone (pain medication) 5mg give 2 tablets by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. A review of the clinical record revealed that on 8/3/19 at 9:22 PM the nurse asked the resident to rate pain on a 0-10 scale with 0 meaning no pain. The resident replied 0 and the nurse administered the medication. The nurse noted the medication to be effective. A review of the clinical record revealed that on 8/3/19 at 9:46 PM the nurse asked the resident to rate pain on a 0-10 scale with 0 meaning no pain. The resident replied 0 and the nurse administered the medication. The nurse then noted the pain medication to be effective. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 8/15/19 at 8:37 AM. She stated that she believes the nurse did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain laboratory blood test as ordered for Resident (#45). This was evident for 1 of 69 residents selected for review of laboratory results during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #45 revealed on 3/14/19 the facility staff received the results of a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel. The comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) is a frequently ordered panel of 14 tests that gives a healthcare provider important information about the current status of a resident's metabolism, including the health of the kidneys and liver, electrolyte and acid/base balance as well as levels of blood glucose and blood proteins. Abnormal results, and especially combinations of abnormal results, can indicate a problem that needs to be addressed. Some components of the CMP are: sodium, potassium, chloride, carbon dioxide, and albumin. Record review revealed the potassium level for Resident #45 was reported as 3.4 mmol/L, and normal is 3.5-5.1. Further record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a medical record in the most accurate form for a resident (#158). This was evident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. On 7-18-19 Nurse Practitioner #19 wrote on a progress note that Resident #158 had an unwitnessed fall earlier that day. When questioned on 8-13-19 about the fall the Director of Nursing(DON) said Resident #158 had not had a fall on 7-18-19. On 8-14-19 at 11:30 AM Nurse Practitioner #19 confirmed that Resident #158 had not had a fall on 7-18-19 but he/she was adding onto a 4-18-19 note by another nurse practitioner and needed to clarify which was her note of 7-18-19 and which was another nurse practitioners note. On 8-14-19 at 11:20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to promote an environment that decreased the potential of transmission of communicable diseases or infections for Resident (#307). This was evident for observation of meal delivery of breakfast on the 2 north nursing unit and 1 out of 69 residents selected for review of infection control during the survey process. The findings include: Observation of breakfast tray delivery for Resident #307 on the 2 North nursing unit for breakfast on 8/7/19 at 8:27 AM revealed the facility staff provided Resident #307 with the tray; however, it was noted the resident was not eating the food. Further observation revealed the facility staff then provided Resident #307 with toast and at that time Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #9 used bare hand food contact to make an egg sandwich for the resident. It was observed that GNA #9 used her bare hand to cut the toast, put egg on the bread and hand the sandwich to Resident #307. Although, the facility staff may wash their hands or use hand sanitizer, it is still the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2019-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 8/9/2019 at 8:03 AM an inspection of the facility's main kitchen revealed that kitchen staff were storing dry sugar, flour and rice in trash bags within metal containers. Further inspection of the black plastic trash bags revealed rips and tears that have the potential to introduce physical contaminants into the dry ingredients. The facility's Goods Services General Manager/ Kitchen Manager stated that the local health department had instructed them to store dry goods in trash bags within the metal containers. Kitchen staff were instructed to only store dry goods in food-grade containers and not in trash bags to avoid contamination. The Administrator, Director of Nursing and [NAME] President of Resident Services were made aware of these findings on 8/15/2019 during the exit conference.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIGUEROA, REGINA | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| BRISCOE, ELIZABETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/01/2019 |
| DEELEY, KAREN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 06/30/2017 |
| DIEGELMAN, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/24/2015 |
| FLOYD PRUE, NANCY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/26/2017 |
| GRANING, KATHRYN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/21/2017 |
| HEMELT, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/01/2018 |
| HOOPER, JR., LAWRENCE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/08/2019 |
| MAGAZINER, JAY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 06/30/2017 |
| ROCKSTROH, MATT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/24/2015 |
| WEISS, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/20/2014 |
| GOMMEL, ERIC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/09/2024 |
| MCSHEA TINNEY, AILEEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/27/2021 |
| FLAGSHIP REHABILITATION, INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| UNIDINE CORPORATION | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| DEBRUYN, THJODIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/14/2013 |
| ROBINSON, APRIL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/19/2001 |
| WAGARA, CAROLINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/11/2019 |
| FRIENDS SERVICES FOR THE AGING | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| C360, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/17/2023 |
| CONNECTRN, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2020 |
| GROSS MENDELSOHN AND ASSOCIATES, PA | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2009 |
| KIPKOE, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/03/2020 |
| LOVING CARE SERVICES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/29/2021 |
| MARQUETTE ASSOCIATES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2010 |
| NTIVA, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/15/2022 |
| PATIENT TRUST HEALTHCARE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| PNC BANK | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2004 |
| SALUJA, DALJEET | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215037. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.