Little Sisters Of The Poor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 20 beds and averages 16.8 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.25 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.14 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.59 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.81 to 1.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the dignity of a resident with urine bag. The deficient practice was found evident for 1 resident (Resident #11) out of 1 resident observed with urine bag during the facility's Medicare/Medicaid recertification survey. The findings include: An indwelling urinary catheter, often called a Foley catheter, is a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine when a person is unable to urinate on their own. It is typically held in place by a small balloon inflated with sterile water inside the bladder. A urine bag, also known as a drainage bag, is a medical device used to collect urine when a person cannot urinate on their own or needs a way to collect urine for medical testing. It's typically connected to a urinary catheter, which is a tube inserted into the bladder. Urine drains from the bladder through the catheter and into the bag. On 06/23/25 at 08:23 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed that Resident #11 had a urinary bag which was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-03-30 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview it was determined the facility failed to have a full time certified dietary manager to oversee the operations in the dietary department. This was evident during a tour of the kitchen during the annual survey and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 3/22/23 at 9:03 AM a tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Director of Food Service, Staff #20. Staff #20 was asked if she was a certified dietary manager (CDM). Staff #20 stated, I have a pre CDM, but I still have to take the test. On 3/29/23 at 1:30 PM an interview was conducted with the Registered Dietician (RD). The RD stated she was only at the facility one day a week on Mondays. When asked if she supervised the kitchen operations she stated, I don't supervise in the kitchen. On 3/29/23 at 2:34 PM the Nursing Home Administrator was informed of the concern and failed to produce documentation that Staff #20 was a CDM.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-03-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on documentation review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to have a quality assurance policy that had written procedures for quality assurance activities. This was evident during the annual survey and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 3/30/23 at 1:52 PM an interview with was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 who oversaw quality assurance activities and Staff #31. LPN #3 described the items that were reported on in quality assurance meetings. The quality assurance and performance improvement program policy was reviewed with LPN #3 and Staff #31. The policy was six pages and documented the purpose, organization, authority, responsibilities, methodology, problem assessment, confidentiality, and evaluation. The policy was an outline of what the facility planned to do and did not have a breakdown of the procedures to do the activities. The policy was missing the following: - procedures for data collection from staff, residents, and RP's (resident representatives) - procedures in the Problem Assessment section -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0622 — pattern
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) orient, prepare, and document a resident's preparation for a transfer to the hospital and 2) document that information was provided to the acute care facility when a resident was transferred there emergently. This was identified for 3 (Resident #9, #16, #4) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) On 3/23/23 at 9:17 AM an interview was conducted with Resident #9. Resident #9 was asked if h/she had been sent to the hospital recently. Resident #9 stated, yes, to rule out a vein blockage. On 3/24/23 at 8:27 AM a review of Resident #9's medical record was conducted and revealed a 10/10/22 nursing note that documented the resident was, alert and verbal but not at baseline and remained in bed this shift d/t 'feeling lousy.' The physician was notified and ordered for 911 to be called to send the resident to the hospital. There was no documentation in Resident #9's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-30 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and medical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 4 (#3, #6, #9, #2) of 14 records reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 3/22/23 at 1:21 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #3 who stated h/she had a fall in the bathroom. On 3/30/23 at 9:19 AM a review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident had a history of falls. Continued review of Resident #3's medical record revealed a nursing note dated 3/16/22 that stated the resident had an assisted fall/lowered to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to develop and initiate comprehensive, resident centered care plans for residents residing in the facility. This was evident for 6 (Resident #3, #4, #5, #6, #9, #10) of 14 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 3/22/23 at 1:18 PM the surveyor entered Resident #3's room and attempted to interview Resident #3. Resident #3 sat in the chair and stared at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evaluate and revise resident care plans to reflect accurate and current interventions. This was evident for 5 (Resident #3, #5, #1, #2, #12) of 14 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On [DATE] at 1:18 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #3. Resident #3 was asked if h/she had any recent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents had only one Maryland Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form in their paper medical record. This was evident for 4 (Residents #14, #1, #16, and #4) of all 17 residents present in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include: The Maryland Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form is a portable and enduring medical order form covering options for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatments. It was designed to ensure that healthcare providers throughout Maryland have a uniform system of communicating a resident's end-of-life wishes in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) is the act of attempting to revive someone one their heart or breathing have stopped. On [DATE] at 9:24 AM, a review was done of the paper medical records for all 17 residents in the facility. The review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to 1) keep the pharmacy reviews with recommendations that identified irregularities in the resident's medical record and 2) report that a physician ordered parameter was not being monitored. This was evident for 4 (#4, #5, #10, #9) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1) On 3/23/23 at 1:40 PM a medical record review was conducted for Resident #4 and revealed progress notes that documented monthly pharmacy reviews were done on 1/18/23 with no recommendations and on 2/16/23 with no recommendations. The 3/9/23 pharmacy review documented, see report. There was no report found in the medical record for the 3/9/23 pharmacy review, therefore there was no documentation if the physician agreed or disagreed with the recommendation. 2) On 3/23/23 at 3:07 PM a medical record review was conducted for Resident #5 and revealed progress notes that documented pharmacy reviews were done on 1/18/23, 9/19/22, 6/7/22, and 5/10/22 that noted, see report. Further review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to: 1) discard expired food items, 2) label food items when opened, and 3) discard damaged food items. This was evident during an inspection of the kitchen, dry storage room, and kitchenette on the unit during the annual survey. The findings include: On 3/22/23 at 9:03 AM a tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Director of Food Service, Staff #20. Observation was made in the refrigerator of the following items: (1) opened gallon of Classic Gourmet tarter sauce with a best by date of 1/31/23 (1) opened gallon of [NAME] Brand Buttermilk Ranch dressing with a best by day of 1/18/23 (2) opened 32 oz. Tulkoff Brand horseradish with best by date of 5/18/22 and 5/15/22 respectively (1) opened gallon of Kens [NAME] Slaw Dressing with no date opened (1) opened gallon of Kens Thousand island dressing with a manufactured date of 3/8/22, with no date opened. Staff #20 stated those items should have been discarded. Observation was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $86K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD