No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Maryland Baptist Aged Home

2801 Rayner Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21216 · Non profit - Church related · 29 certified beds · (410) 945-7650 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 945-7650 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jun 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2401 W Baltimore St · (410) 945-7706 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
520 N Franklintown Rd · (410) 362-3838 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
630 N Franklintown Rd · (410) 566-0014 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2600 Edmondson Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
719 Poplar Grove St · (443) 869-6061

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.2%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.2%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.4%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.4%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.6%22.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.4%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.5%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.2%25.0%21.2%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 55% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.88
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.21
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
55.6%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 29 beds and averages 24.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-02)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2022-06-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) maintain proper labeling, dating, and expiration practices for food items, and 2) did not consistently meet the manufacturer-recommended range of Quaternary Ammonium Compounds (QACs) for dish sanitization. This was found to be evident during the initial kitchen visit of the annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1) During a Kitchen tour on 5/28/25 at 8:17 AM, Staff #8 was unable to identify the correct expiration date on a box of hot sauce, noting conflicting and possibly expired dates. Cereal dispensers (Raisin Bran, [NAME] Krispies, Frosted Flakes) were all labeled 2/14/25. Staff #8 was unsure if this was the date the cereal was put in the dispenser or the expiration date. Expired spices were found Poultry Seasoning (exp. 9/27/2019) and Allspice (exp. 8/10/2023). On 5/28/25 at 8:35 AM, Staff #7 and Staff #8 could not consistently identify or date items in the Unit 2 freezer due to lack of labeling. Conflicting dates were given for chicken and ground beef, and Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and record review it was determined that the facility failed to have an Registered Nurse (RN) on duty 24 hours a day for 7 consecutive days. The findings include: The PBJ Staffing Data Report listed that on Saturday, 10/05/2024, Saturday, 11/02/2024, Sunday, 12/01/2024, Saturday, 12/07/2024, Saturday, 12/14 /2024, Saturday, 12/21/2024, and Wednesday, 12/25/2024 there weren't any RNs on duty for the full 24 hours. The facility provided 2 weekends of scheduling (5/24-5/25/2025) and (5/31-6/1/2025) and consistently on Saturdays and Sundays there weren't any RNs on duty for the entire day. During an interview with the Administrator on 05/29/25 at 10:22 AM , she was asked about the dates targeted in the PBJ report. She stated that there was not an RN on duty on those dates. The Administrator stated that the facility was unable to find RN staff for weekends and holidays either from staff or agency. For the 2 week staffing schedule that was provided, there weren't any RNs working on the weekends (weekends of 5/24-5/25 and 5/31-6/1).

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-02 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility assessment did not accurately reflect the services provided by the facility. This deficient practice was discovered during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 05/30/25 at 4:30 PM the surveyor reviewed the facility assessment provided by the Director of Nursing. A review of the assessment revealed it was documented the facility had an average of 10 resident admissions during the weekday. The assessment failed to include they have the capacity to admit residents who had infectious diseases such as COVID-19, MRSA, and/or Clostridium Difficile. The portion of the assessment regarding caring for residents with conditions not listed was incomplete. The assessment indicated that the facility is equipped to care for residents with a tracheostomy, although there are no current residents within the facility. Showers were not listed for assistance provided for activities of daily living. On 06/02/25 at 11:21 AM during an interview with the Director of Nursing and Administrator the surveyor reported the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-02 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility's governing body and/or executive leadership failed to ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program identified & prioritized problems that reflected the organizational process, functions, and services provided to residents based on performance indicator data, resident and staff input, and other information. This deficient practice was discovered during the recertification survey. The findings include: On [DATE] at 10:26 AM after reviewing the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement plan the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON). The surveyor informed DON that the QAPI plan was ineffective because it lacked a systematic approach that identified problems, tracked, investigated, and analyzed data. When the surveyor asked the DON, was there oversight of the QAPI processes by a governing body and the DON verbalized, No. On [DATE] at 10:45 AM the Administrator verbalized Chief Financial Officer #14 provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to: 1) ensure a call device was installed in shower areas and 2) a cord used to turn on/off a call light was attached to the call system in the toilet stalls. This was evident for 2 of the 2 environmental observations during the annual survey. The findings include: On 5/28/25 at 10 AM the surveyor conducted a tour of the facility and observed the bathroom on the long hall without a call device in the shower area, and no string attached to the call device in the toilet stall. The shared bathroom on the short hall was without a call device in the shower area and two of the 3 toilet stalls were without strings attached to the call device. On 5/29/25 at 11:01 AM a subsequent tour of the facility with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Maintenance Director revealed the bathroom on the long hall without a call device in the shower area, and no string attached to the call device in the toilet stall. The shared bathroom on the short hall was without a call device in the shower area and two of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide residents with showers and get residents out of bed. This deficient practice was evidenced in 2 (#1 & #22) of 2 residents assessed for choices during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 05/28/25 at 9:28 AM during observation rounds the surveyor asked Resident #22 how often he/she gets out of bed (OOB). Resident #22 verbalized they don't get OOB although they would like to. The surveyor observed a Gerry chair in the shared bedroom. Resident #22 verbalized the chair was used for their roommate. On 05/29/25 at 1:27 PM a review of Resident #1 and Resident #22 electronic health records (EMR) to verify if the residents had a shower; there was no documentation to verify whether the residents had a shower. A review of the shower list revealed Resident #1 was scheduled to have a complete bed bath (CBB) on Monday and Friday during the 3 PM - 11 PM shift. Resident #22 was scheduled to have a CBB on Monday and Friday during 11 PM - 7 AM shift. On 05/29/25 at 2:06 PM the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage to a resident's representative prior to being discharged from the facility. The deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (#4) of 1 resident record reviewed for NOMNC compliance during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 05/29/25 at 1:36 PM the surveyor received the list of residents who were discharged from the facility within the past 6 months. Three residents transitioned, five residents remained in the facility, and one resident went to an assisted living facility (ALF). On 05/29/25 at 2:32 PM during an interview with Social Worker #4 and the Administrator, the surveyor asked, Did Resident #4's responsible party (RP) receive a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage prior to the resident's discharge? The surveyor received a copy of Resident #4 Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage dated 05/16/25. The resident representative's signature was not on the form; a note was typed on the form indicating that Resident #4's responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the resident receiving psychotropic medications were necessary and justified when staff failed to complete behavioral and mood monitoring documentation for the conditions that the psychotropic medications were prescribed for. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 6) of 4 residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. The findings include: Psychotropic medications, also known as psychiatric or psychoactive medications, are drugs that affect the mind, emotions and behavior. They are primarily used to treat mental health disorders, and can be divided into several categories, including antidepressants, antipsychotics, antianxiety, and hypnotics. On 05/29/25 at 08:36 AM, a record review was conducted. Resident # 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He/She had the diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia; Major depressive disorder; anxiety disorder unspecified; Dementia with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify a resident's representative in writing of the reason why the resident was transferred to the hospital and failed to provide a copy of the bed-hold policy to the resident representative. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (#17) of 2 resident records reviewed for transfer/discharge practices during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 05/28/25 at 2:01 PM a review of Resident #17 electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was hospitalized in February and April 2025. The surveyor was unable to find documentation in the EMR indicating why the resident was hospitalized . On 05/29/25 at 9:15 AM the surveyor along with the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed Resident #17's paper medical record located at the nurse's station. The transfer summaries dated 2/26/25 and 04/27/25 indicated the resident's family/responsible party was notified by telephone of the hospitalizations. There was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days of a significant change of the resident's physical or mental condition. This was evident for 1 (Resident #20) of 1 resident reviewed for Hospice during an annual survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff members gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. A significant change means a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without further intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, that has an impact on more than one area of the resident's health status, and requires interdisciplinary review or revision of the care plan, or both. On 5/29/25 at 12:16 PM a record review revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to complete and transmit a Minimum Data Set assessment within the required 14-day timeframe. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (#1) of 2 resident MDS assessments reviewed for timely completion during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 05/30/25 at 12:27 PM a review of Resident #1 quarterly MDS assessment revealed the assessment review date (ARD) was 04/05/25 and the assessment was signed on 04/25/25 which was outside of the 14-day window to complete and transmit the assessment. On 05/30/25 at 12:47 PM during a telephone interview with the MDS Coordinator the surveyor asked why Resident #1 MDS assessment was completed outside of the required 14-day timeframe. The MDS Coordinator verbalized that the assessment was not completed within the required timeframe because the staff who needed to complete Section E & Section Q did not complete their assessments in a timely manner. After the facility staff completed their portion of the assessment, the assessment was submitted. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to complete a narcotic count when a registered nurse assumed control over the nursing assignment. The deficient practice occurred during the recertification survey. The findings are: On 05/29/25 at 8:40 AM a review of the Controlled Drug Count Verification form revealed on 05/18/25 7AM - 3 PM shift a nurse signed the form as the incoming nurse. The outgoing nurse's signature 3PM - 11PM was different from the incoming nurse's signature. On 05/19/25 3PM-11PM shift the incoming nurse's signature and the outgoing 11PM- 7 AM shift was different. The surveyor could not verify if the narcotic count was completed by the nursing staff if another nurse completed the shift other than the incoming nurse. On 05/29/25 at 9 AM during an interview with the Director of Nursing the surveyor reported concerns about the nurse's completing the narcotic count as a nursing professional standard of practice. When the surveyor asked was the narcotic count completed when the nurse assumed control of the nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and observation it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the use of a hand splint as stated in the care plan. This was true for 1 (Resident # 9) out of 29 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 5/29/2025 at 2:17 PM, A record review was conducted. Resident # 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He/She had hemiplegia affecting the left non dominant side and left-hand contracture. On 5/30/2025 at 11:38 AM, a review of Resident # 9's medical record was conducted, there was no documentation of any rehabilitation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistently provide Activities to residents who were unable to participate in communal Activities. This deficient practice was evidenced in 2 (#1 & #22) of 2 resident records reviewed for staff providing Activities to bedbound residents during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 05/28/25 at 9:25 AM while speaking with Resident #22 the surveyor asked does someone come to the room and do Activities with him/her. Resident #22 verbalized a lady used to come to their room and do Activities with him/her, but the lady no longer works there, and it stopped. On 05/29/25 at 2:24 PM during a review of Resident #1 Activities Log revealed the last documented activity session was on 05/01/25. A review of Resident #22's Activities Log revealed the last documented Activity session was 04/28/25. During an interview with Activities Director #6 he/she was unable to verbalize why the resident's were not receiving Activities regularly.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1.) properly label medications and dated once opened, and 2). Remove expired medications from the medication cart. This was evident for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1.) On 5/30/2025 at 08:58 AM, a medication observation was conducted in the presence of staff # 8 (Certified Medication Aide) and revealed for medication cart 1 to have 2 eye drops, Dorzamide and Latanoprost eye drops for Resident # 8 both opened without a date they were opened. Resident # 20 had Dorzamide eye drops and found to be not dated. Upon further observation, medication cart 2 was noted to have 2 bottles of Nystatin powder for Resident # 14 with no date when both bottles were opened. It was also found to have 2 tubes of Duoderm Hydroactive gel without any label and not dated. Staff # 8 acknowledged the findings. Upon further medication storage observation, a canister of blood glucose strip was found in medication cart 2 without the date when it was opened. This was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an Occupational Therapy evaluation for 1 (Resident # 9) out of 29 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 5/28/2025 at 09:39 AM, an initial interview was conducted, Resident # 9 stated, I don't have any therapy. On 5/29/2025 at 2:17 PM, a record review was conducted. Resident # 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He/She had hemiplegia affecting the left non dominant side and left-hand contracture. On 5/30/2025 at 11:38 AM, a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to have an effective system in place to identify, report, track, investigate, and analyze information relating to adverse events that occur within the facility. This deficient practice was discovered during the recertification survey. The findings include: On [DATE] at 10:26 AM after reviewing the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON). The surveyor informed the DON that the QAPI plan was ineffective because it lacked a systematic approach that identify problems, track, investigate, and analyze data. The DON verbalized the team meets monthly, and they were instructed to do review problems in the areas that needed to be approved. Their major concern was staffing. At first they were not using agency but started to meet the needs of the residents. The surveyor asked for documentation to show how they were monitoring that the building was properly staff. There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to include the Infection Preventionist in the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. This deficient practice was discovered during the recertification survey. The findings are: On 05/30/25 at 2:42 PM the surveyor reviewed the sign-in sheets for QAPI meetings held on 01/31/25, 02/19/25, 03/19/25 and the Infection Preventionist's name or signature was not included on any of the sign-in sheets. On 05/30/25 at 2:56 PM during a telephone interview with Infection Preventionist #3 the surveyor asked did he/she attend any QAPI meetings. IP #3 verbalized they did not attend the QAPI meetings in person but was present via telephone. IP #3 was made aware that their name was not included as attending the meetings in person or by telephone. The surveyor asked when the last time he/she participated in a meeting. IP #3 was not able to provide the information requested. On 05/30/25 at 3:13 PM the Director of Nursing was made aware the Infection Preventionist is required to attend QAPI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that they had an adequate emergency water supply and were unaware of the building's water system and unable to provide a description of it, a diagram and no testing of the water had been done for legionella and/or other opportunistic waterborne pathogens. The findings include: On 05/28/25 at 10:27 AM the surveyor spoke with two housekeeping staff and the Director of Maintenance (Staff #1) regarding water testing and emergency water supply. Staff #1 said the city took care of water testing and would notify the facility if there was a problem. The surveyor informed him that the City provided the water up to the facility, but that the facility was responsible for the water system inside the building including testing for Legionella and other waterborne bacteria. He was completely unaware that the facility was responsible for testing the water and stated that they had not tested it anytime during the 2 years he had been employed in the facility. He also stated that they had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0912 — isolated
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to apply for a room waiver for rooms less than the required square footage. This deficient practice was discovered during the annual survey. The findings include: On 05/28/25 at 8:33 AM during the entrance conference with the Director of Nursing (DON) the surveyor asked did the facility have any waivers. The DON verbalized the facility had a waiver for rooms that are less than the required size. The surveyor requested a copy of the waiver. On 05/29/25 at 9:15 AM the surveyor reviewed a document received after the entrance conference. The document indicated rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was less than the required square footage. The surveyor asked the Administrator for a copy of the waiver. The Administrator verbalized they were told not to apply for a waiver unless the survey team asked for the waiver. The surveyor made the Administrator aware the waiver should have been available prior to the survey to avoid noncompliance.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of the facility on 6/27/22, the facility failed to provide maintenance services to keep the resident's environment safe and in good repair. This was evident in all resident rooms and hallways. In addition, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident rooms were kept in a home like environment. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 3 (affecting Residents #10, #16 and #22) resident rooms observed during the re-certification survey. The findings include: 1. An environmental tour was conducted by three surveyors at 10 AM on 6/27/22. Another tour of the facility was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/29/22 at 11 AM. It was noted that the floor in the hallways was uneven with gouges and separation in the tile with mix matched tiles as a temporary fix to the floor. In the bedrooms mix matched tiles throughout the rooms was observed with exposed rough, uneven edges. The floor tiles were also loose and/or missing in room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-30 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and documentation review, it was determined the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing hours and ratios at the beginning of each shift. This was evident for nursing assignments posted from June 28, 2022, to June 30, 2022. The findings include: During tour of the facility on 06/28/22 6:40 AM the surveyor observed staff assignments posted on the whiteboard opposite the nurses' station which read: Date: 6/27/2022 Shift:7 AM to 3 PM. Actual staffing hours and staffing ratios worked by licensed and unlicensed staff not found. On 6/28/2022 at 6:45 AM Staff #6, stated he worked the 6/27/2022 3 PM to 11 PM shift as well as the overnight shift 11 PM to 7 AM. During a subsequent tour of the facility on 06/29/22 at 6:13 AM the surveyor observed staff assignments posted on the whiteboard opposite the nurses' station which read: Date: 6/28/2022 7 AM to 3 PM Shift. Actual staffing hours and staffing ratios worked by licensed and unlicensed staff not found. On 6/29/2022 at 6:55 AM Staff #7, stated that she worked the 6/28/2022 11 PM to 7 AM shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review and observation of medical records, Controlled Drug Count Verification sheet and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to: 1. ensure that an account of all controlled drugs was completed with two licensed nurses at the change of each shift. This was evident for 1 of 1 available narcotic count logs. The findings include: During the first observation of medication pass on 6/29/2022 at 7:35 AM, surveyors started by reviewing the medication administration logs of the current residents to see when medication pass times were scheduled for and the different medications that would be scheduled. During review and as part of the medication storage task, the narcotic log was reviewed. The nightshift slot for the 7-3 shift was signed off as of 7:37 AM and the corresponding day shift signature was not. The day shift LPN, staff # 3 and the night shift LPN, staff #6 were present at the nursing desk. Staff #6 was asked if they had completed the narcotic count for the change of shift. He stated 'no, they were getting ready too.' He was then shown the book to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical review the facility failed to notify Resident # 21 and the resident's responsible party in writing of the reason for the transfer to the hospital and send a copy to the Ombudsman. This was evident for 2 (resident #9 and resident # 21) of 3 residents reviewed during the closed record review portion of the survey. The findings include: 1. On 06/27/22 at 10:08 AM a medical record review was conducted for Resident # 21. The resident had been sent to the hospital on 2 different occasions. On 4/7/22-4/15/22, Resident #21 was sent to the hospital due to a change in mental status. Resident # 21 was found to be lethargic and unresponsive. He has a history of cognitive impairment, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and tachycardic. The resident was placed on antibiotic therapy and an appointment was made to follow up with the urology clinic for staghorn calculus. He was also placed with a urinary catheter for retention. On 5/25/22 Resident #21 was sent to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident medical record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident # 21 who has a history of urinary track infections and kidney stones in addition to retention of urine. This was evident for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: On 06/27/22 at 10:08 AM a medical record review was conducted for Resident # 21. The resident had been sent to the hospital on 2 different occasions. On 4/7/22-4/15/22 the resident was sent to the hospital due to a change in mental status. Resident # 21 was found to be lethargic and unresponsive. He has a history of cognitive impairment, COPD, CVA and tachycardia. Resident was placed on antibiotic therapy and a appointment was made to follow up with urology clinic for staghorn calculus. He was also placed with a urinary catheter for retention. On 5/2522 Resident #21 was sent to the hospital for a complicated UTI (Urinary tract infection) associated with catheter use. Resident has surgery (ureteroscopy) on 6/3/22 to remove staghorn calculus. Resident # 21 was also placed on Cefdinir 300 mg 2 times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow physician orders regarding nutrition for a resident exclusively dependent on gastrostomy tube (also called a G-tube, is a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) feeding and ensure that s/he was fed all scheduled and ordered tube feeding nutrition. This was evident for 1 of 1 residents (#14) in the facility that were ordered gastrostomy tube feedings. The findings include: During an interview on 6/29/2022 at 7:35 AM with the night and day shift staff, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6, and LPN #3 respectively. The Surveyors inquired as to the next scheduled time that Resident #14 was to receive his/her g-tube feeding. The facility staff both simultaneously stated that Resident #14 received g-tube feeding 3 times a day and that s/he will not be due again until 2:00 PM. The Surveyors continued with their review of Resident #14's medication administration record (MAR) and paper chart as part of the closed record review portion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1. complete a discharge summary on a resident to include a recapitulation of the resident's medication and 2. Provide a resident with discharge instructions at discharge. This was evident in 1 of 3 residents (#26) reviewed for discharge. The findings include: Review of the closed medical record on 6/29/2022 at 12:31 PM for Resident #26 revealed a discharge from the facility on 4/4/2022 according to his/her electronic health record (EHR), specifically the nursing progress notes that documented the resident was discharged home on 4/4/2022 at 5:40 PM. This progress note though did not address any training or review any medications the resident was to be discharged home on. In addition during this review no physician discharge summary was located in the residents closed chart. A social work note completed on 4/1/2022 documented that medications were reviewed with the resident on 4/1/22 at a care plan meeting, however there was no documentation in the chart that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to arrange a follow up appointment for a resident's venous stasis ulcer. This was evident for 1 (Resident #23) of 1 resident reviewed for wounds. The findings include: On 6/28/22 at 10:27 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #23 in his/her room. During the observation, the resident was noted to have a wound to his/her right leg. There was an intact bandage on the leg wound. The resident was unable to be interviewed. On 6/30/22 at 8:13 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #23's medical record. The record showed that the resident's right leg wound was present on admission in 2021 and improved as of a physician's note written on 10/31/21. However, a note was found from a vascular surgery appointment on 1/19/22 that indicated Resident #23's right leg venous wound had reopened. The note indicated that the resident should be ordered compression dressing, should elevate the extremities, should wear compression stockings, and will need to continue to be followed by a vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and medical record reviews, it was determined that this facility failed to follow Physician Orders regarding management of Tube Feeding for a resident totally dependent on gastrostomy tube feeding. The findings include: During tour of the facility on 6/28/2022 at 8:55 AM Resident #14 was observed in his/her room asleep. Observation of Resident #14's room revealed the presence of a 60-cc syringe used for gastrostomy tube feeding on the resident's bedside table. On 6/29/2022 during review of the medication administration record (MAR) for Resident #14, surveyor noted that s/he was scheduled for feeding via the gastrostomy tube at 10:00 AM. Surveyor interviewed staff Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 and #4 regarding when Resident #14 was scheduled to be fed again and they both stated not until 2 PM and further that s/he only is fed 3 times a day. On 6/29/2022 at 9:00 AM, while observing staff LPN #3 on Medication Pass, LPN # 3 was interviewed on, how many times each day, Resident #14 is fed. LPN# 3 answered three times. This Surveyor asked her to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to document an accurate overview of the resident during a physician visit. This was evident during 1 of 3 physician record reviews. (R #12) The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 on 6/29/22 at 8:26 AM revealed a physician visit note dated 3/26/2022 documenting 11 medications in the resident's profile, with one medication listed 3 times and two different medications referred to twice. A review of the resident's concurrent medication administration record revealed Resident #12 was only 12 medications, however, only 9 of the medications that were listed in the physician note. Two of the medications listed; Aricept and Abilify were not documented as administered since before December 2021. These medications were also listed on the physician progress notes for 4/9/22 and 5/14/22, 6/11/22 and 6/19/22. These concerns were reviewed with the facility Director of Nursing throughout the survey and again on 7/1/2022 at 9:30 AM and again during the survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a nurse aide had no less than twelve hours of in-service education per year. This was evident for 1 (Staff # 16) of 3 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) reviewed during the Sufficient and Competent Staffing Review portion of the survey. The findings include: During review of Staff #16's personnel file On 6/30/2022 8:30 AM , it was revealed that the most current GNA training was completed by Staff #16 on 5/29/2020. On 6/30/2022 9:45 AM an interview was conducted with the DON. During the interview the DON stated: the file we submitted is our current in-service and training record for Staff #16. The concern regarding failure to ensure a nurse aide had no less than twelve hours of in-service education per year was addressed with the Administrator and DON on 6/30/2022 1:30 PM.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensur:e 1) appropriate temperature maintained for the medication refrigerator, 2) expired medications were properly disposed, 3) ensure medications were kept in secured locations, and 4) food items were not kept in medication storage room. This was found to be evident in 1 out of 1 medication storage rooms observed during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1) On 06/30/22 at 10:43 AM the surveyor and Director of Nursing (DON) conducted an observation of the medication storage room. The surveyor and DON found the medication refrigerator thermostat temperature at 50 degrees Fahrenheit. The medication refrigerator log stated minimum temperature of 36 degrees Fahrenheit and a maximum of 46 degrees Fahrenheit. 2) On 06/30/2022 at 10:45 AM the Surveyor and DON observed the inside of the medication refrigerator and found 3 Latanoprost eye drops that expired on 2/25/2022 and 3 Trulicity insulin pens that expired on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide dental services and assessments within a reasonable time frame. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 4 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for dental. The findings include: During a tour conducted on 06/27/2022 at 11:55 AM surveyor observed resident #10 with missing teeth and a broken tooth on the left side of the resident's mouth. During an interview conducted on 06/27/2022 at 11:56 AM, resident #10 stated he/she had not seen a dentist since he/she had resided at the facility and currently had a sore mouth from his/her broken teeth. The Resident stated he/she had not told the facility about the mouth pain. On 6/28/22 at 02:26 PM a record review of the physical chart was conducted. The surveyor located 1 dental/oral assessment conducted on 07/17/2019. The assessment documented the resident #10 had a total of 6 teeth in his/her mouth. During an interview conducted on 06/28/2022 2:32 PM Medical Records #13 reviewed the resident's chart and confirmed the resident had one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that leftover foods were cooled in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: During a tour of the kitchen that took place on 6/28/22 at 12:40 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). During the interview, the CDM was asked if the facility maintains any leftover food after it has been prepared. The CDM stated yes, the facility does keep leftover foods in small quantities after some meals. The surveyor asked if the facility tracks the cooling temperatures of potentially hazardous cooked foods to ensure that they cool from 135°F to 70°F within 2 hours and from 70°F to 41°F within 4 hours. The CDM indicated that there was not such a process, stating that there was no expectation that staff take the temperature of cooling foods prior to refrigeration. The CDM denied having any cooling log of potentially hazardous leftovers.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food service was operated in a clean and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: The surveyor conducted a tour of the kitchen on 6/28/22 at 12:40 PM. The tour revealed the following findings: - the surveyor noted a used scoop for serving sugar and flour that was being kept inside the bin for the sugar and flour, exposing the food to the contaminated handle. - the surveyor noted approximately 8-10 seasoning containers with heavily soiled lids. The containers were placed next to the steam trays and had evidence of being contaminated by splash from food preparation. The lids all had thick brown crust on their tops and sides. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) indicated that the containers were reused because of their smaller size, and that staff refilled them from larger storage containers of the respective spices. The CDM indicated that she would obtain new smaller spice containers. - the surveyor identified a red…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a facility-wide assessment of necessary resources for resident care and review and update the assessment at least annually. This practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: On 6/30/22 at 9:50 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Administrator. During the interview, the administrator stated that she recalled completing a 2 page document that she thought served as a viable facility assessment. The Administrator couldn't say when it was last reviewed or seen, but stated that she expected to find it in the survey resource binder. During a follow up interview that took place on 6/30/22 at 10:05 AM, the Administrator stated that she had reviewed the facility resource binder and couldn't locate the facility assessment there or anywhere else.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-30 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the appropriate staff attended the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meeting. This was found to be evident for 5 out of 5 QAPI meetings held. The findings include: On 06/27/2022 at 11:25 AM a record review of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting attendance sheets revealed the Medical Director was not in attendance for meetings held January, February, March, April, and May 2022. During an interview conducted on 06/27/2022 at 12:27 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated he/she had taken the role to conduct the QAPI meetings since the last person left in December of 2021. The Administrator confirmed the Medical Director was not listed as an attendee because the Medical Director attended the QAPI meetings by telephone. The Surveyor requested supportive documentation to confirm the Medical Director attendance. On 06/27/2022 at 1:35 PM the surveyor reviewed the QAPI meeting notes and was for January, February, March, April, and May 2022 and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-30 · tag F0912 — isolated
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on previous room measurements, observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of floor space per resident in 2 of the 11 residents rooms. The findings include: As previously determined the floor space for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] is calculated to be 75.5 square feet of floor space per resident. Both rooms are equipped to house two residents each. The Nursing Home Aadministrator had acknowledged that rooms 101, and 102 did not meet the floor space requirement during environmental rounds conducted on 6/27/22 at 11 AM. The Administrator also presented a waiver to the survey team. During the survey, there were 2 residents in 101 and 102. The residents in these rooms had no issue with the size of the rooms. The calculated room size did not meet the 160 square foot requirements for a 2 person room.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that handrails were secure to provide a safe environment. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 5 handrails observed during the re-certification survey. The findings include: During a tour of the facility conducted on 06/27/2022 at 8:32 AM, the surveyor observed a handrail hanging in a downward position away from the wall located in the hallway between resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and the restroom. During an interview conducted on 06/27/2022 at 8:35 AM the Maintenance worker #2 stated he/she would repair the handrail. The Surveyor observed Maintenance worker #2 attach the handrail to the wall. On 06/27/2022 at 9:05 AM the surveyor advised the Administrator of the findings during an interview.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the privacy of medical information. The findings include: This surveyor observation of the outside of the facility on 4/9/2019 at 12:00 PM revealed: 1. The back of the facility revealed 11 overflowing boxes of varies medical and staff information including a Resident to Resident investigation dating back to 2009. 2. The back of the facility revealed 4 overstuffed, blue duffle bags that was not completely closed and had current medical information including empty medication packages. 3. The fence around the facility needed repair and was unsecure. Anyone in the back of the facility had visible to the medical information. The Director of Nursing and Administrator was interviewed on 04/09/19 at 12:44 PM, revealed that the company Shred-It was to come out today and pick- up the bags to be destroy. The Administrator stated that she understood the findings of unsecure medical information.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the 4/3/2019, observation of resident bedrooms and bathrooms, it was revealed that there was evidence of unattended maintenance necessary to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This was evident for 3 of 18 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: During the initial tour of the facility on April 3, 2019, the survey team observed the following evidence of unattended maintenance and/or housekeeping concerns: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] was found with the base board molding to the right of the door, approximately 2 feet long pulled away from the wall. In addition, there was a missing floor tile next to the night stand. 2. On 4/3/2019 at 11:30 AM Resident #20's wheel chair padding on both arms was torn. 3. On 4/3/2019 at 11:00 AM Resident #21's wheel chair was repaired with grey duct tape. 4. All nursing homes must assure that adequate housekeeping and maintenance services were provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based upon resident interview, staff interview and medical record review it was determined that facility staff failed to assist a resident in obtaining routine and emergency dental care. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #21,) during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1. An interview was conducted with Resident #21 on 4/3/2019 at 8:30 AM. When asked if the resident was experiencing any dental or oral issues the resident responded I have missing teeth and tooth pain. I told them I wanted to see a dentist. Medical record review reveals an evaluation of oral/dental status on 8/8/2018, at that time the Resident requested to be seen by a Dentist 2nd to missing teeth. Further, medical record review reveals a Physician order on 3/16/19 to start amoxicillin 500mg by mouth every 12 hours, times 7 days for tooth ache/abscess. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 4/8/19 at 9:30AM, confirmed the facility staff failed to obtain the dental consult. Following surveyor intervention, a dental consultation was scheduled for the resident.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to maintain all essential mechanical, electrical, equipment in safe operating condition. The findings include: On 4/3/2019 at 8:30 AM, during an initial tour of the facility's the following observations was made: 1. Resident's room [ROOM NUMBER]A has a call bell cord attached to the wall with expose wires. 2. Observation of the laundry on 4/8/19 at 12 Pm, revealed that there were multiple issues in evidence of unattended maintenance. The dryer room revealed lint attached to the walls, floor and covering the exhaust fan. These findings were acknowledged by the Director of Nursing on 4/9/19 at 9 AM.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-09 · tag F0912 — isolated
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure all of the rooms met the requirement for square footage. The findings include: The Administrator was asked on 4/3/19 if the facility had any waivers. She informed the team that she had a waiver for the square footage of two of the rooms, 101 and 102. The floor space was calculated to be 75.5 square feet of floor space per resident for both rooms. Both rooms are equipped to house two residents each. The nursing home administrator confirmed that the rooms do not meet the requirement and informed me that a waiver request had been faxed to OHCQ on 2/18/19. There are two residents currently living in each room. None of the residents complained about the room size.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DEWITT, DERRICKIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/08/2014
MASON, CLEVELANDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2014
WARREN, ELMOREIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2010

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$233per resident / day
operating cost
$7,097per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$250per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215360. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next