No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

South Mountain Rehab Center

141 South Main Street, Boonsboro, MD 21713 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 157 certified beds · (301) 432-5457 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (301) 432-5457 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Dec 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
20311 Lappans Rd · (301) 432-4000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7628 Old National Pike · (301) 432-5488 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
146 S Main St · (301) 686-5779 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Shaffer Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.8%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms23.4%22.8%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened33.9%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.0%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.9%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%5.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.5%25.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.5%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine65.0%80.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.5%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.6%9.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.531.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.691.201.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 343 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 149 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.3%CMS range 50.6–62.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 7.8–12.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge49.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified80.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.6%CMS range 3.8–7.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
1.07
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.53
RN hoursweekends
47.6%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 157 beds and averages 125.9 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-06)
30
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a pertinent document review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an Emergency Medical Service (EMS) transport crew with the correct Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) for a resident being transported to the hospital, This deficient practice contributed to the resident not receiving life-sustaining treatment prior to cardiac arrest and resulted in the resident's death during transport. This was evident for one (Resident #200) of one resident reviewed for an unexpected death during a complaint survey. Consequently, an Immediate Jeopardy was called on [DATE] at 3:26 PM.The findings included:A Maryland MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form is used to document a resident's specific wishes related to life-sustaining treatments. The MOLST form includes medical orders for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and other medical personnel regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and other life-sustaining treatment options for a specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service equipment in a manner that ensures sanitary food service operations to prevent possible foodborne illness. This was evident during the kitchen tour of the recertification survey. The findings include: A food-contact surface refers to any surface of equipment and utensils that typically comes into contact with food; or from which food may drain, drip, or splash onto food; or a surface that is usually in contact with food. Cross-contamination refers to the transference of harmful substances or pathogenic microorganisms to food by hands, food contact surfaces, sponges, cloth towels, kitchen equipment and/or utensils that have not been properly cleaned after contacting raw food and then touching ready-to-eat foods. Cross-contamination can also arise from inadequate dishwashing procedures that fail to effectively wash, rinse, sanitize, air-dry, and/or stored in sanitary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene when entering and exiting a room in which a resident was on neutropenic precautions. This was evident for 1 (Resident #84) of 1 resident on neutropenic precautions reviewed during the initial screening process of the annual survey.The findings include:Neutropenic precautions are critical safety measures for individuals with low white blood cell counts (neutropenia) to prevent life-threatening infections. Key actions include strict hand hygiene, avoiding crowds and sick individuals, consuming only well-cooked foods, avoiding raw fruits and vegetables, and removing fresh flowers or plants from the environment.On 3/03/26 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor observed a sign posted on Resident #84's door indicating the resident was on neutropenic precautions.On 3/03/26 at 9:36 AM, the surveyor observed a geriatric nursing assistant (GNA #21) entering and exiting Resident #84's room without performing hand hygiene. The surveyor asked GNA #21 to explain the sign posted on the door…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike environment. This was evident in 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #103) of 2 residents' rooms reviewed during the recertification survey.The findings include:1) On 03/04/2026 at 3:27 PM, Resident #103 expressed a complaint to the surveyor regarding the cold temperature of the room while resting in bed, utilizing a heavy blanket obtained from home. A family member seated next to the resident indicated that they had previously voiced concerns about the cold room temperatures and the inadequacy of the thin vinyl rolling window treatment in blocking sunlight.The surveyor inspected the window and determined that the corner of the windowsill exhibited significant damage. In addition, the warped window frame, where sealant had been previously applied showed evidence of torn material resulting in slow air drafts. The ambient room temperature measured with a calibrated stem thermometer, placed on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice and hospital transfer documents to a resident and failed to provide written notice of the hospital transfer to resident's representative. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the survey.The findings include:On 3/6/26 at 8:52 AM a record review of Resident #1's electronic health record revealed Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on 2/25/26. Further review revealed that Resident #1's family representative was notified via telephone.On 3/6/26 at 9:47 AM in an interview, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #18) confirmed that the hospital transfer process was the same throughout the facility and described that once a physician order was obtained, the unit clerk prints and assembles pertinent medical records and places them into an envelope titled: Acute Care Transfer Document Checklist. The transferring nurse verifies the contents and sends the packet with the resident.On 3/6/26 at 10:38 AM the Unit Clerk (Staff #19)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure bathroom and floor tiles were maintained in good repair and that the exhaust ventilation system was working. This was found to be evident on 4 out of 4 units observed during the survey. The findings include: 1) Tour of the first-floor bathrooms/shower room secondary to reported complaints of cleanliness revealed substantiated concerns related to a sanitary environment for Residents to bathe. Tour initiated on 12/18/24 at 9:32 AM of the Antietam shower room revealed hair on both shower stall walls, a caked white substance on the wooden seats, the molding along the entrance into both shower stalls was missing or peeling off. There was noted black areas where the molding was missing. The soap dish in both shower stalls was missing porcelain and the netting under the porcelain was exposed making it rough and uncleanable. There was no safety mat on the left side. A repeat tour was conducted on 12/19/24 at 3:50 PM with the maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records, facility policies, investigation documentation, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that allegations involving abuse were reported to the State Agency no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made and results of all investigations were reported within 5 working days. This was evident for 5 (Resident #421, #214, #468, #469, #264) of 13 residents reviewed for abuse allegations. The findings include: 1) a. Review of a complaint from 2/1/23 on 12/19/24 at 11:51 AM revealed that resident's family member was notified by the facility that Resident #421 had a fall from [resident] shoes and was sent to the emergency room where a cat scan was completed. Resident #421 at the time of the fall had diagnosis including dementia, muscle wasting and Alzheimer's disease. S/he was also residing in the secure unit of the facility. Care plan and GNA task list report had resident documented as requiring 2 staff for transfers. Review of the nursing progress notes completed on 1/23/23 at 11:04 AM noted that Resident #421 was found on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse. This was evident for 4 (Resident #416, #264, #213 #44) in 13 residents reviewed for abuse. The Findings include: 1) Resident #416 was admitted to the facility in late 2022. On 12/19/24 at 7:56 AM, a review of the investigation packet related to MD00203250 was conducted. The review revealed that the resident had an injury of unknown origin to his/her left thigh. The investigation packet also indicated that the resident was not interviewed due to not having the capacity and having a diagnosis of Dementia. Dementia is a general term for a decline in mental abilities that affects a person's daily life. It's characterized by a loss of cognitive functioning, including memory, thinking, and reasoning. The investigation packet also indicated that a head-to-toe assessment was conducted on the resident and documentation was confirmed on 12/19/24 at 8 AM. However, further review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and medical records review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to adequately meet residents' personal hygiene needs and provide a resident with the amount of assistance needed during meals. This was evident for 5 (Residents #10, #68, #66, #62, #369) of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living during the survey process. The findings included. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments are an integral part of the RAI and include completion of standardized assessment questions. There are comprehensive MDS assessments and periodic non-comprehensive MDS assessments which facilities conduct to maintain an accurate understanding of each resident's most current needs and strengths, and to ensure care planning remains current and effective. 1) On 12/11/24 at 9:00 AM Resident #10, a long-term resident of the facility, was observed awake and lying in bed awake. Further observation revealed the resident had long fingernails with black and brown spots…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) ensure the attending physician address irregularities identified on the pharmacy recommendation, b) implement the attending physician's response to the pharmacy recommendation, and c) specify timeframes in the steps of the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) process. This was evident in 2 (Resident #38, #21) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1) Resident #38 was a newly admitted resident of the facility. On 12/17/24 at 1:29 PM, a review of the admission medication review revealed 2 irregularities identified by the pharmacist. The irregularities were: a) Vitamin B12 Sublingual liquid 3000 mcg/ml (Cyanocobalamin)- dose differs from discharge summary, (400 mcg feeding tube, once daily) please re-evaluate and address noted irregularities. b) Eliquis oral tablet 5 mg.- initiate or increase medication monitoring- Please consider the following monitoring parameters: Monitor/document/report to doctor/Nurse practitioner signs and symptoms of anticoagulant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to comply with the State and Local Laws and Professional Standards as evidenced by: 1) a failure to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was on duty 24 hours a day 7 days a week and 2) a failure to maintain Hours Per Patient Day (HPPD) above 3.0. This was evident for: 1) 8 out of 16 days reviewed for RN coverage and 2) 13 out of 106 days reviewed for low staffing. The findings include: On 12/19/24, during the staffing task of the survey process, a review of the posted staffing for the two weeks prior to the start of the survey failed to reveal a RN on duty for 6 of these 14 days reviewed. There was no RN on duty for the night shifts on November 26, 28, 29, 30 or December 3, or 5, 2024. During the survey process, the surveyors received 8 separate residents reports about low staffing, particularly on the weekends. On 12/20/24 at 11:05 AM, the staffing coordinator (Staff #37) reported that their goal is at least one RN for each shift but confirmed that they are not meeting that goal every day. On 12/20/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to inform and provide written information to all residents concerning their right to formulate an advance directive. This was evident for 1(Resident #68) out of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives during a survey. The findings include: An advance directive is a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor. It is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity. On 12/10/24 at 1:06 PM, a review of the medical records of Resident #68 revealed that resident #68 had cognitive decline. Continued review failed to reveal that Resident #68 had an advanced directive. On 12/19/24 at 7:53 AM the social work assistant (SW assistant staff #12) was interviewed regarding the facilities process to inform a resident about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaint, closed record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify Resident #217's representative in a timely manner after a significant change occurred. This was evident for 1 out of 24 complaints reviewed during an annual certification survey. The findings include: On 12/17/24 Complaint MD00179215 was reviewed involving Resident #217. An allegation that Resident #217's family was not immediately made aware of a change in condition that occurred during the morning of 02/28/22 was investigated. Resident #217 was admitted to the facility during the afternoon on 02/25/22 with diagnoses that included an acute embolic stroke, expressive and receptive aphasia, paralysis in the extremities, a new feeding tube, and a Foley catheter. A review of Resident #217's closed medical record on 12/17/24 revealed a nurses note, dated 02/28/22 at 6:52 AM, that indicated a GNA (geriatric nursing assistant) staff member informed the charge nurse, staff member #19, that Resident #217 was observed with a large amount of emesis. Staff member #19 documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the required transfer information was documented in the medical record when a resident was transferred to the hospital. This was evident for 1 (Resident #267) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include: On 12/13/24 at 8:36 AM review of intake #MD00184369 revealed a concern regarding Resident #267's elopement from the facility and subsequent hospitalization. On 12/13/24 at 10:22 AM review of progress notes revealed a nursing note dated 10/11/2022. Review of this note revealed that Resident # 267 returned to the facility at 07:40 AM from the Hospital emergency room the morning on 10/11/22 at 7:40 AM, in a stable condition, with an abrasion on both bilateral lower extremities. Further review of the progress notes failed to reveal documentation that the resident was transferred to the hospital or the reason for the transfer. Continued review failed to reveal a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for a resident within the regulatory time frames to facilitate appropriate care planning and maintain the current assessment record. This was evident for 1 (Resident #42) in 3 residents reviewed for Resident assessments. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment is a federally mandated assessment tool that nursing home staff use to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. The information collected is used in the resident's care planning decisions. The Quarterly assessment must be completed within 92 days of the MDS Completion Date of the last OBRA assessment. It must also be completed no later than 14 days after the ARD, which is the ARD + 14 days. The last day of the observation period is the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). This date provides a common reference point for all team members participating in the assessment. In completing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and submit Minimum data set (MDS) Discharge assessments as required for residents discharged from the facility. This was evident for 3 (#105, #112, #64) of 4 residents reviewed for Resident assessments. The findings included: The MDS assessment is a federally mandated assessment tool that nursing home staff use to gather information on each Resident. Discharge assessments include items for quality monitoring. Discharge assessment reporting is required for all residents in the nursing home who have been physically discharged from the facility. 1a) A record review for Resident #105 on 12/19/24 at 1:35 PM showed that the Resident was admitted to the facility in October 2024. The continued review contained a nurse's note dated 12/9/24 that stated that Resident #105 was discharged to another facility. Further review of Resident #105's MDS record showed a lack of discharge assessment for the Resident. 1b) A review of Resident #112's record contained a nurse's note dated 9/27/24 that indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately documented. This was evident for 1 (#66) of 7 residents reviewed for position and mobility and 1 (Resident #111) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is an assessment of the Resident that provides the facility information necessary to develop a care plan, provide the appropriate care and services to the Resident, and modify the care plan based on the Resident's status. 1) An observation on 12/10/24 at 3:14 PM showed that Resident #66's fingers were bent on the right hand, pressed into his/her palm, and stated, I've not been able to move my right hand and both legs in the last year. A review on 12/18/24 at 12:10 PM showed that Resident #66 had been residing in the facility since September 2022. Diagnoses included Multiple Sclerosis (MS), with spastic paraparesis (stiffness and weakness in the legs) and Bell Palsy. A continued review contained occupational therapy (OT)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) form completed at the time of admission appropriately reflected the resident's diagnosis. This was true for 1 (Resident #16) of 2 PASARR forms reviewed for accuracy. The findings include: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals with intellectual disability or a serious mental illness are not inappropriately placed in nursing facilities for long term care. The requirement ensures that all applicants receive care in the most suitable setting and are provided with all the necessary resources available. Review of Resident #16's initial nursing admission assessment on 6/20/2019 revealed a diagnosis of bipolar disorder; however, the most recent PASRR form completed on 2/14/2020 failed to reflect that resident had mental illness diagnosis on Section C. question #1. Section C of the PASRR form has questions to identify if the resident has serious mental illness and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan. This was evident for 3 (Residents #34, #74, and #101) of 6 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The findings include: 1) On 12/13/24 at 10:40 AM, an interview was conducted with Director of Nursing (DON). When asked if a baseline care plan given to Resident #34 or their Representative (RP), the DON stated, I cannot provide any documentation to confirm that Baseline Care plan was given to RP or resident. On 12/13/24 12:49 PM, a review of Resident #34's medical record was conducted. Resident #34 was admitted [DATE]. No documentation of baseline care plan being given to Resident Representative or Resident in the medical record. On 12/19/2024 at 2:00 PM, the DON provided a Care Plan Conference Appointment scheduled for 10/17/2024 addressed to Resident #34. 2) On 12/17/24 at 11:20 AM, a review of Resident #74's record was conducted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and pertinent document review it was determined that the facility failed to provide activities according to the resident's preferences. This was evident for 1 (Resident #91) out of 3 residents reviewed for activities during a survey. The findings include 12/11/24 at 8:49 AM Resident #91, a long-term resident of the facility, was observed lying in bed with her/his breakfast sitting on the bed side table. Further observation revealed that Resident #91 was awake and about ¼ of their breakfast was eaten. Further observation failed to reveal either music or the television (TV) being on. 12/12/24 02:45 PM An observation made in Resident # 91's room revealed the resident sitting behind the door, not visibly observing the TV, which was on a news channel. 12/17/24 at 7:54 AM Resident # 91 was observed eating in her/his room and not facing the TV. Further observation revealed a football game on the TV. On 12/18/24 several observations were made of Resident 91's room at the following times: 8:04 AM, 8:44 AM, and 12:03 PM. All these observations revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, complaint MD00211139 and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received the appropriate treatment as ordered, in accordance with professional standards of practice. This is true for 2 (Resident #21 and Resident #110) of 3 residents reviewed during the survey process. The findings include: 1.)On 12/18/24 at 11:37 AM, a review of Resident #110's chart revealed that the resident's Maryland order of Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) revealed that the resident was on comfort care and without hospitalization. A review of complaint MD00211139 revealed an allegation that from 10/11/24 to 10/14/24, Resident #110 began experiencing seizures that worsened until death. Further review of the medical record revealed that on 07/10/24 a physician's order was placed: Midazolam HCl (PF) Injection Solution 5 MG/ML (MidazolamHCl) Inject 1 ml intramuscularly as needed for seizure activity; however, there was no documentation to indicate how often the medication could be given or what to do if found to be ineffective. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with limited range of motion received treatment and services to prevent further decline in the range of motion. This was evident for 2 (#66, #62) out of 7 residents reviewed for position and mobility. The findings include: 1) An observation on 12/10/24 at 3:14 PM showed that Resident #66's fingers were bent on the right hand, pressed into his/her palm, and had no device. The resident stated, I've not been able to move my right hand and both legs in the last year. A record review on 12/18/24 at 12:10 PM showed that Resident #66 had been residing in the facility since September 2022 and depended on the staff for assistance with his/her self-care needs due to physical limitations. The review also contained an occupational therapy evaluation dated 9/27/22- 10/17/22 that recorded that Resident #66's bilateral upper extremities were within functional limits and had no contractures. A continued review of an occupational therapy evaluation dated 9/19/23 noted an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and facility record review, it was determined that the facility failed to 1.) ensure that a safe designated space for smoking was maintained in various weather conditions and 2.)to carry out a physician's order to check the placement of a residents wonder guard every shift for placement. This was true for 1 of 2 resident smoking observations conducted and for 1 (Resident #91) out of 8 Residents reviewed for accidents during a survey. The findings include: On 12/11/24 at 1:03 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #16 and another resident smoking in a small, covered patio area of the [NAME] unit. The maintenance director (Staff #35) was outside with the residents at the time of the observation and assisted them with coming back inside after they finished smoking. On 12/11/24 at approximately 1:15 PM, in an interview with maintenance director, he was asked about the smoking area and he informed the surveyor that there was a designated smoking area; however, due to the rainy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that weekly weights were obtained as ordered by the physician. This was evident for 1(Resident #24) of 6 resident records reviewed for significant weight loss. The findings include: On 12/11/2024 at 2:28 PM, a review of the Resident #24 medical records revealed that the resident had a significant weight loss (more than 20 lbs) from June to August of 2024. On 8/31/2024 weight monitoring was ordered daily for 3 days; on 9/9/2024 weekly weights were ordered. A review of the weights log revealed that on 9/1/24 resident weighed 134.6 lbs and on 12/10/24 the resident weight 124.4 which equals to 7.5% weight loss in approximately 3 months. It was noted that Resident #24 had a significant 20% weight loss over a 6 month period (June to December 2024). On 12/18/24 at 10:14 AM, Resident #24's physician orders revealed that as of 9/9/24, weekly weights were ordered; however, it was noted that there were no weights obtained in the 2nd, 3rd or 4th week of September 2024. There were also no weights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to document the reasons for administering as-needed (PRN) pain medications and failed to document pain assessment to include the location of the pain and type of pain for a Resident reporting pain. This was evident for 1 (Resident #97) of 5 Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications review. The findings include: A medical record review for Resident #97 on 12/12/24 at 2:44 PM showed that the resident had been admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses including left hip fracture, left elbow fracture, chronic pain syndrome, and arthritis. Further review of Resident #97's medication administration record for November 2024 contained an attending provider's order for Hydromorphone 0.5mg every 12 hours as needed for pain and tramadol 50mg every 6 hours as needed for pain. A continued review showed that Resident #97 had received hydromorphone 0.5mg on 11/7/24 for a pain level of 5, 11/9/24 for a pain level of 6, and 11/11/24 for a pain level of 6 (A pain scale/level ranges from 0 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a history of trauma received the appropriate trauma-informed care. This was evident for 1 (Resident #97) of 4 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A record review contained a social history for Resident #97 dated 9/10/24, which had recorded that the resident had a history of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event). A subsequent review completed for Resident #97 on 12/12/24 at 2:44 PM, contained an attending provider's order dated 11/05/24 for an antidepressant medication to be administered to Resident #97 daily for PTSD. Further review showed a behavioral health note dated 11/13/24 that recorded that Resident #97 had a diagnosis of PTSD. However, the review failed to show what the triggers were for the traumatic event and how to mitigate or eliminate them to ensure the resident was not traumatized again. In an interview on 12/17/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure staff maintained current certification and or licensure. This was evident for 1(Staff #41) of 5 Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) certification records reviewed. The findings include: On [DATE] at approximately 11:20 AM, a review of Staff #41's employment record revealed that the staff was hired as a CNA. A review of Staff #41's CNA certification on the State board registry (Maryland Board of Nursing) showed that her certification expired on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 2:39 PM, a review of Staff #41 timesheet information revealed that she was working in the facility as of [DATE]. On [DATE] at approximately 2:39 PM, Corporate Nurse #6 was made aware that Staff #41's expired certification. On [DATE] at approximately 11:15 AM, in an interview with Staffing Coordinator (GNA#37), the staff was asked who was responsible for ensuring that the licenses and certification of each staff member has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to keep resident's drug regimens free from unnecessary medications by failing to ensure residents received their medications according to the attending physician's orders. This was evident for 1 (Resident #97) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and 1 (Resident #102) out of 5 residents observed during medication administration. The findings include: Blood pressure (BP) is often written as an upper and lower number. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) is the upper number. It measures the pressure in the arteries during heart muscle contraction. 1) A record review on 12/12/24 at 2:44 PM showed that Resident #97's diagnoses included hypertension and received Prazosin 2mg daily and metoprolol 25mg twice daily per an attending provider's orders. The order also stated to hold (not to give) the medications for SBP less than 120. A subsequent review of Resident #97's medication administration records (MARs) from November 1- December 16, 2024, showed that the resident received the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication use by failing to adequately monitor a resident for behaviors, side effects, or adverse consequences related to psychotropic medication use. This was evident for 1 (Resident #97) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A record review on 12/12/24 at 2:44 PM showed that Resident #97 had been residing in the facility since September 2024. The continued review contained an order summary report that documented an attending provider's order for an antidepressant medication for Resident #97 due to depression. The review also showed that the resident was given the drug daily as prescribed from 11/6/24- 11/30/24. Further review of Resident #97's plan of care contained a care plan focus initiated on 9/12/24 for the use of an antidepressant. Interventions on the care plan included Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness [Q-every] shift, monitor/document/report [PRN-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. This was evident based on two errors identified out of 28 opportunities for error. The findings include: During medication administration observation on 12/13/24 at 8:53 AM, the surveyor observed a licensed practical nurse (LPN#1) pull the following medications from the medication cart for Resident #102 in a medicine cup: 1 capsule of Fenofibrate Micronized 134mg 1 tablet of Folic Acid 1mg 1 tablet of Potassium chloride 20meq 1 capsule of Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg 1 tablet of Lisinopril 20mg 1 tablet of Vitamin B12 1000mcg 1 tablet of Vitamin D 25mcg. The surveyor asked LPN#1 to confirm how many pills were in the medicine cup before giving them to Resident #102. She stated there were seven tablets. A review of Resident #102's December 2024 medication administration record (MAR) was completed following the medication administration. The review showed the attending provider's orders for Metoprolol 200mg and Amlodipine 5mg to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that expired medications were disposed of promptly per the manufacturer's specifications. This was evident for 1 of 4 medication refrigerator storage observed. The findings include: An observation of the 2nd floor medication storage room refrigerator in the presence of Staff #49 on 12/17/24 12:45 PM revealed that Tylenol 650 mg suppository expired 7/20/2024. Staff #49 stated that it should have been discarded. Staff #49 reported the error to Staff#7, Unit Manager. On 12/18/2024 at 9:32 AM, during an interview with ADON, this surveyor mentioned the expired Tylenol suppository found on the second-floor unit. ADON stated that expectation of the nurses was to get rid of expired medications. ADON also said it is an expectation that nurses are to write the expiration dates on the medication packages so that they would know when to discard them once they were received from the pharmacy. On 12/18/24 at 10:35 AM during an interview with the ADON, this surveyor stated that the weekly storage room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective process in place to ensure that adaptive devices that were recommended by therapy were provided to a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 5) observed during the dining observation portion of the recertification survey. The findings included: On 12/10/24 at 12:21 PM, an observation was made in the Manor unit dining hall. The observation revealed a puddle of liquid on the floor under Resident #5's chair. Further observation revealed the same liquid on the table dripping onto the floor. The observation failed to reveal whether any adaptive devices were provided to the resident. On 12/11/24 at 8:39 AM a second observation was made in the Manor unit dining hall. Resident #5 was observed at the table with a puddle of white liquid under his/her chair. Further observation revealed a tipped-over cup of milk. Observation failed to reveal any adaptive devices were provided to the resident. On 12/11/24 at 12:06 PM a third observation was made in the Manor unit dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the resident matrix accurately. This was evident in 2 of 3 resident matrix reviewed during the survey. The findings include: The resident matrix is a form that is completed by the facility. The form lists the resident's name, room number and have columns numbered 1 through 20 that are marked with the resident's corresponding care categories. All information entered into the form should be verified by a staff member knowledgeable about the resident population. Information must be reflective of all residents as of the day of survey. On 12/10/24 after entrance to the facility at approximately 9:30 AM, multiple staff members had confirmed, including the Director of Nursing (DON), that the facility was not in an outbreak and no resident was infected with COVID. During the initial team meeting on 12/10/24 at 1:42 PM, the survey team had identified and discussed discrepancies with the resident matrix, including Resident #77 and #88, that were marked as having COVID infections. Resident #88 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and records review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff use appropriate infection control practices. This was evident for 1 (Resident #38) of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding and 1 out of 2 medication administrations observed and has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: 1) PEG: A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a surgery to place a feeding tube. These feeding tubes are often called PEG tubes or G tubes. Feeding tubes, or PEG tubes, allow you to receive nutrition through your stomach. This type of feeding is also known as enteral feeding or enteral nutrition. Resident #38 was a newly admitted resident of the facility. A quick review of his/her medical records indicated that the resident was admitted with a peg tube for nutrition. On 12/10/24 at 3:20 PM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) was observed accessing Resident #38's peg tube. LPN #1 was not wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). A sign posted on the resident's door was also observed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have documented evidence that all nurses' aides received 12 hours of training that included abuse prevention and Dementia management, annually and training needed to provide competent care. This was evident for 5 (GNAs #25, #37, #39, #41, and #50) of 5 randomly selected nursing staff reviewed for competencies. The findings include: Nursing competence is defined by the American Nurses Association as an expected level of performance that integrates knowledge, skills, abilities, and judgment. On 12/13/24 at 10:24 AM in an interview with GNA #25, the GNA was asked if she has received training and competency to perform personal care to the residents and she said yes. However, she was unable to report when the training was last completed. She said it has been a while, I don't remember to be honest. On 12/19/2024 approximately 11:20 AM, the surveyor requested staff files for 5 staff members and the staff files received were incomplete. A review of the staff records revealed that there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to void an older MOLST form located in a resident's active medical record. This was evident for 1 (Resident #112) of 2 residents reviewed for Advance Directives during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: A Maryland MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form is used to document a resident's specific wishes related to life-sustaining treatments. The MOLST form includes medical orders for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and other medical personnel regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatment options for a specific patient. Instructions for completing a Maryland MOLST require that a Physician, Nurse Practitioner (NP), or a Physician Assistant (PA) accurately and legibly complete the form and then sign and date it. Voiding the Form: to void this medical order form, a physician or nurse practitioner shall draw a line through the sheet, write VOID in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This deficient practice has the potential to affect multiple residents. The findings include: 1. On 10/28/2019 at 12:45 PM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], one of four window shades is missing the adjustment rod to open and close the blind. 2. In room [ROOM NUMBER], 2 of the 4 closet doors are in disrepair. The third closet door has duct tape and does not close all of the way. The fourth closet door does not close and is seated crocked and in disrepair. These items were brought to the attention of the facility environmental services manager.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-01 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on reviews of administrative records and staff interview, it was determined that the nursing administrative staff failed to conduct a yearly performance review on 3 of 5 geriatric nursing assistants for the year of 2018. The findings include: On 08/28/19, a review of 5 random geriatric nursing assistants (GNA) for yearly performance appraisal revealed that 3 of the 5 GNA's had not had a yearly appraisal for the year 2018. Review of GNA #1's records revealed that GNA #1's performance appraisal was not conducted in 2018. Review of GNA #2's records revealed that GNA #2's performance appraisal was not conducted in 2018. Review of GNA #3's records revealed that GNA #3's performance appraisal was not conducted in 2018. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/01/19 at 10:25 AM, the facility DON confirmed that GNA #1, GNA#2, and GNA #3 were not given a performance appraisal for the past 12 months in 2018.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, it was determined the facility staff failed to properly store medications. This was observed once during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: An observation was made on 10/28/19 at 12:53 PM on the 300 wing at the nursing station. The surveyor observed one of two unattended and unlocked medication carts. A medication cart holds the medications for the residents residing on the 300 wing. No nursing staff members were attending to the medication cart at the time of the observation. The nursing unit manager was immediately made aware of finding and locked the open medication cart.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GLEN ECHO HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 03/01/2025
MD SANS HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2025
MD SANS MARS 2024 TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2025
MD SANS VENUS 2024 TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2025
OBERON CORE HOLDINGSOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2025
ZAMBRY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2025
ZAMBRY MARS 2024 TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2025
ZAMBRY VENUS 2024 TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2025
CIBC BANK USAOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
HORNUNG, STEVENIndividual5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 03/01/2025
KAMINER, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 03/01/2025
BOHRER-BANZHOFF, NICOLEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
SALAZAR, ANDRESIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
STINE, TERRIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
CLINE, CARRIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
HORNUNG, RACHELLEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2025
KAMINER, LEORAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2025
ACCORD CONSULTANTSOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
DIALYZE DIRECT MD LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
MD SAPPHIRE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
ONE KAYLOR CIRCLE MD LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
SCHIAVI WALLACE & ROWE PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
Z-RADAR LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
SLADKY, SERINAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 18%Other / private 19%

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$374per resident / day
operating cost
$11,376per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$385per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215144. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next